fond
Model Checking Contest 2024
14th edition, Geneva, Switzerland, June 25, 2024
Execution of r579-smll-171734921100020
Last Updated
July 7, 2024

About the Execution of LTSMin+red for MedleyA-PT-03

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
521.483 133952.00 181407.00 738.90 FFTFFFFFTTFFTFTF normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r579-smll-171734921100020.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool ltsminxred
Input is MedleyA-PT-03, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r579-smll-171734921100020
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 492K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.9K Jun 2 17:16 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 62K Jun 2 17:16 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.6K Jun 2 17:16 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 57K Jun 2 17:16 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K Jun 2 17:12 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K Jun 2 17:12 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K Jun 2 17:12 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Jun 2 17:12 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1 Jun 2 16:33 NewModel
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K Jun 2 17:16 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 158K Jun 2 17:16 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.2K Jun 2 17:16 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 62K Jun 2 17:16 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.5K Jun 2 17:12 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Jun 2 17:12 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 2 16:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 Jun 2 16:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 2 16:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K Jun 2 16:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1717351822804

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=ltsminxred
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=MedleyA-PT-03
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Applying reductions before tool ltsmin
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-06-02 18:10:25] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -timeout, 360, -rebuildPNML]
[2024-06-02 18:10:25] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-06-02 18:10:25] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 110 ms
[2024-06-02 18:10:25] [INFO ] Transformed 108 places.
[2024-06-02 18:10:25] [INFO ] Transformed 100 transitions.
[2024-06-02 18:10:25] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-06-02 18:10:25] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 108 places and 100 transitions and 272 arcs in 312 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 156 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 30 out of 108 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 100/100 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 107 transition count 100
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 98 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 98 transition count 91
Applied a total of 19 rules in 68 ms. Remains 98 /108 variables (removed 10) and now considering 91/100 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 91 rows 98 cols
[2024-06-02 18:10:26] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 24 ms
[2024-06-02 18:10:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 378 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 18:10:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 18:10:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 287 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 743 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 90 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-02 18:10:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 138 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 76 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 70 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 7/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 5/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 91/189 variables, 98/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:10:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:10:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:10:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:10:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 4/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:10:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:10:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:10:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 3/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/189 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 189/189 variables, and 126 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 7073 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 20/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 91/189 variables, 98/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 90/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 2/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 1/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 0/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/189 variables, 0/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 189/189 variables, and 219 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 10515 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints]
After SMT, in 17704ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 17730ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/108 places, 91/100 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 18583 ms. Remains : 98/108 places, 91/100 transitions.
Support contains 30 out of 98 places after structural reductions.
[2024-06-02 18:10:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 44 ms
[2024-06-02 18:10:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-06-02 18:10:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 91 transitions.
Support contains 28 out of 98 places (down from 30) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (672 resets) in 1717 ms. (23 steps per ms) remains 2/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (171 resets) in 482 ms. (82 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (183 resets) in 463 ms. (86 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
[2024-06-02 18:10:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 21/26 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 55/81 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 91/172 variables, 81/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 17/189 variables, 17/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/189 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 189/189 variables, and 106 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 121 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp12 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 21/26 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 55/81 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 91/172 variables, 81/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 17/189 variables, 17/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 1/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 0/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/189 variables, 0/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 189/189 variables, and 107 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved in 140 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 269ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 23861 steps, including 622 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 56 ms. (steps per millisecond=426 )
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 67 ms.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Computed a total of 98 stabilizing places and 91 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 98 transition count 91
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(p0))'
Support contains 1 out of 98 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 91/91 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 14 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 14 transitions
Performed 14 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 14
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 97 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 83 transition count 76
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 83 transition count 66
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 73 transition count 66
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 72 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 72 transition count 65
Performed 22 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 22
Deduced a syphon composed of 22 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 50 transition count 43
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 49 transition count 42
Applied a total of 95 rules in 86 ms. Remains 49 /98 variables (removed 49) and now considering 42/91 (removed 49) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 42 rows 49 cols
[2024-06-02 18:10:46] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-02 18:10:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 1854 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 18:10:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 18:10:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 116 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1988 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-02 18:10:48] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 41 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-02 18:10:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 42/90 variables, 48/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/91 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/91 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 91/91 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved in 1122 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 42/90 variables, 48/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 41/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/91 variables, 1/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/91 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 91/91 variables, and 98 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved in 1487 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2652ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2653ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/98 places, 42/91 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4736 ms. Remains : 49/98 places, 42/91 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 363 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-00
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 11 steps with 0 reset in 3 ms.
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-00 finished in 5295 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(X(p0))&&(X(p0) U p1)))'
Support contains 4 out of 98 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 91/91 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 93 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 93 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 92 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 92 transition count 85
Applied a total of 12 rules in 30 ms. Remains 92 /98 variables (removed 6) and now considering 85/91 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 92 cols
[2024-06-02 18:10:52] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 7 ms
[2024-06-02 18:10:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 128 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 18:10:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 18:10:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 190 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 320 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 84 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-02 18:10:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/92 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 64 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 2/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 85/177 variables, 92/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 57 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 1/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/177 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 177/177 variables, and 103 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved in 3765 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 92/92 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 84/84 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/92 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 3/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 85/177 variables, 92/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 84/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 1/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/177 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 177/177 variables, and 188 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved in 6276 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 92/92 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 84/84 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 10077ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10080ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/98 places, 85/91 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 10432 ms. Remains : 92/98 places, 85/91 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 139 ms :[(NOT p0), true, (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-01
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-01 finished in 10597 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F((G(p0)||(G(p2)&&p1)))))'
Support contains 3 out of 98 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 91/91 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 11 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 11 transitions
Performed 11 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 11
Iterating post reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 97 transition count 79
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 86 transition count 78
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 85 transition count 78
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 85 transition count 67
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 74 transition count 67
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 72 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 72 transition count 65
Performed 19 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 19
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 53 transition count 46
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 53 transition count 46
Applied a total of 89 rules in 32 ms. Remains 53 /98 variables (removed 45) and now considering 46/91 (removed 45) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 46 rows 53 cols
[2024-06-02 18:11:02] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 18:11:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 18:11:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 18:11:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 18:11:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 132 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 195 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-02 18:11:02] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 45 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-02 18:11:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 18:11:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 46/99 variables, 53/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 1/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/99 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 99/99 variables, and 64 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved in 1766 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 45/45 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 8/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 46/99 variables, 53/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 45/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/99 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 99/99 variables, and 109 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved in 1995 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 45/45 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 3783ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3785ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 53/98 places, 46/91 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4018 ms. Remains : 53/98 places, 46/91 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 267 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-02
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5313 reset in 720 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5341 reset in 283 ms.
Computed a total of 53 stabilizing places and 46 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 53 transition count 46
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 p2 p0), (X p2), (X (NOT (OR (AND p0 (NOT p1)) (AND p0 (NOT p2))))), (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (AND (NOT p0) p1 p2)), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 p2))), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1), (X (X p2)), (X (X (AND p0 p2))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND p0 (NOT p1)) (AND p0 (NOT p2)))))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 p2)))), (X (X (AND p0 p1 p2))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2)))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (F (G p1)), (F (G p2)), (F (G p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 22 factoid took 36 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 10 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-02 finished in 5414 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((p0||(p1 U G(p2)))))'
Support contains 2 out of 98 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 91/91 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 14 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 14 transitions
Performed 14 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 14
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 97 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 83 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 81 transition count 74
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 81 transition count 64
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 71 transition count 64
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 69 transition count 62
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 69 transition count 62
Performed 19 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 19
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 50 transition count 43
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 49 transition count 42
Applied a total of 95 rules in 24 ms. Remains 49 /98 variables (removed 49) and now considering 42/91 (removed 49) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 42 rows 49 cols
[2024-06-02 18:11:08] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 18:11:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 18:11:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 18:11:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 104 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 179 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-02 18:11:08] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 41 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-02 18:11:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 42/90 variables, 48/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/91 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/91 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 91/91 variables, and 58 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved in 1270 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 42/90 variables, 48/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 41/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/91 variables, 1/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/91 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 91/91 variables, and 99 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved in 1803 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 3095ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3096ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/98 places, 42/91 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3307 ms. Remains : 49/98 places, 42/91 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 53 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-03
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 5 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-03 finished in 3384 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 98 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 91/91 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 15 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 15 transitions
Performed 15 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 15
Iterating post reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 97 transition count 75
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 82 transition count 75
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 82 transition count 65
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 72 transition count 65
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 70 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 70 transition count 63
Performed 20 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 20
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 50 transition count 43
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 50 transition count 43
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 49 transition count 42
Applied a total of 96 rules in 30 ms. Remains 49 /98 variables (removed 49) and now considering 42/91 (removed 49) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 42 rows 49 cols
[2024-06-02 18:11:11] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 18:11:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 98 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 18:11:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 18:11:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 134 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 234 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-02 18:11:11] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 41 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-02 18:11:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 42/90 variables, 48/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/91 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/91 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 91/91 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved in 1033 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 42/90 variables, 48/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 41/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/91 variables, 1/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/91 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 91/91 variables, and 98 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved in 1621 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2681ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2682ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/98 places, 42/91 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2955 ms. Remains : 49/98 places, 42/91 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 95 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-04
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 10 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-04 finished in 3069 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)&&F(G(p1)))))'
Support contains 3 out of 98 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 91/91 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 15 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 15 transitions
Performed 15 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 15
Iterating post reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 97 transition count 75
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 82 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 81 transition count 74
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 81 transition count 65
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 72 transition count 65
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 70 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 70 transition count 63
Performed 20 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 20
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 50 transition count 43
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 49 transition count 42
Applied a total of 95 rules in 22 ms. Remains 49 /98 variables (removed 49) and now considering 42/91 (removed 49) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 42 rows 49 cols
[2024-06-02 18:11:14] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 18:11:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 18:11:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 18:11:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 109 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 184 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-02 18:11:14] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 41 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-02 18:11:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 42/91 variables, 49/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/91 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 91/91 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved in 954 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 42/91 variables, 49/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 41/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/91 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 91/91 variables, and 98 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved in 1618 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2592ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2593ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/98 places, 42/91 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2806 ms. Remains : 49/98 places, 42/91 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 109 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-05
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 33 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-05 finished in 2936 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 98 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 91/91 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 93 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 93 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 92 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 92 transition count 85
Applied a total of 12 rules in 6 ms. Remains 92 /98 variables (removed 6) and now considering 85/91 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 92 cols
[2024-06-02 18:11:17] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 18:11:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 103 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 18:11:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 18:11:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 184 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 291 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 84 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-02 18:11:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/92 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 79 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 2/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 85/177 variables, 92/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 84 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 1/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/177 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 177/177 variables, and 103 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved in 4031 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 92/92 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 84/84 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/92 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 3/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 85/177 variables, 92/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 84/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 70 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 1/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/177 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 177/177 variables, and 188 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved in 6661 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 92/92 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 84/84 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 10720ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10723ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/98 places, 85/91 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11022 ms. Remains : 92/98 places, 85/91 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 117 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-07
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-07 finished in 11153 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(p0)||F(G(p1))))'
Support contains 3 out of 98 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 91/91 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 16 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 16 transitions
Performed 16 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 97 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 81 transition count 74
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 81 transition count 65
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 72 transition count 65
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 70 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 70 transition count 63
Performed 19 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 19
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 51 transition count 44
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 50 transition count 43
Applied a total of 93 rules in 18 ms. Remains 50 /98 variables (removed 48) and now considering 43/91 (removed 48) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 43 rows 50 cols
[2024-06-02 18:11:28] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-02 18:11:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 18:11:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 18:11:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 18:11:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 96 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 161 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-02 18:11:28] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 41 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-02 18:11:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 18:11:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/50 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 43/93 variables, 50/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/93 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 93/93 variables, and 60 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved in 1269 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/50 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 43/93 variables, 50/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 41/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/93 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 93/93 variables, and 102 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved in 2467 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 3755ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3758ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 50/98 places, 43/91 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3944 ms. Remains : 50/98 places, 43/91 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 96 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-09
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5059 reset in 455 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5021 reset in 398 ms.
Computed a total of 50 stabilizing places and 43 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 50 transition count 43
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1), (X p1), (X (X p1)), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 14 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-09 finished in 4963 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((X(G(p0))&&(p1 U p2))))'
Support contains 3 out of 98 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 91/91 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 13 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 13 transitions
Performed 13 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 13
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 97 transition count 77
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 84 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 83 transition count 76
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 83 transition count 67
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 74 transition count 67
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 73 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 73 transition count 66
Performed 20 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 20
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 53 transition count 46
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 52 transition count 45
Applied a total of 89 rules in 13 ms. Remains 52 /98 variables (removed 46) and now considering 45/91 (removed 46) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 52 cols
[2024-06-02 18:11:33] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 18:11:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 18:11:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 18:11:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 135 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-02 18:11:33] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 44 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-02 18:11:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 45/96 variables, 51/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/97 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/97 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 97/97 variables, and 61 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved in 1051 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 52/52 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 45/96 variables, 51/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 44/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 1/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/97 variables, 1/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/97 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 97/97 variables, and 106 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved in 2372 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 52/52 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 3440ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3441ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 52/98 places, 45/91 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3594 ms. Remains : 52/98 places, 45/91 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 193 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-10
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 10 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-10 finished in 3805 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(X(G(p0)))))'
Support contains 1 out of 98 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 91/91 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 93 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 93 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 92 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 92 transition count 85
Applied a total of 12 rules in 4 ms. Remains 92 /98 variables (removed 6) and now considering 85/91 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 92 cols
[2024-06-02 18:11:37] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-02 18:11:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 118 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 18:11:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 18:11:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 192 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 313 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 84 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-02 18:11:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/92 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 2/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 85/177 variables, 92/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:11:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 80 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 1/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/177 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 177/177 variables, and 103 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved in 3694 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 92/92 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 84/84 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/92 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 3/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 85/177 variables, 92/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 84/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 1/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/177 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 177/177 variables, and 188 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved in 6029 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 92/92 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 84/84 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 9751ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9753ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/98 places, 85/91 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 10071 ms. Remains : 92/98 places, 85/91 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 169 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-11
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 3 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-11 finished in 10260 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(p0)||F(p1)))'
Support contains 2 out of 98 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 91/91 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 13 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 13 transitions
Performed 13 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 13
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 97 transition count 77
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 84 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 83 transition count 76
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 83 transition count 66
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 73 transition count 66
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 71 transition count 64
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 71 transition count 64
Performed 20 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 20
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 51 transition count 44
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 50 transition count 43
Applied a total of 93 rules in 12 ms. Remains 50 /98 variables (removed 48) and now considering 43/91 (removed 48) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 43 rows 50 cols
[2024-06-02 18:11:47] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 18:11:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 18:11:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 18:11:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 113 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 179 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-02 18:11:47] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 42 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-02 18:11:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 43/92 variables, 49/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/93 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/93 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 93/93 variables, and 58 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved in 1105 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 43/92 variables, 49/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 42/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/93 variables, 1/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/93 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 93/93 variables, and 100 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved in 1655 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2775ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2776ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 50/98 places, 43/91 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2973 ms. Remains : 50/98 places, 43/91 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 100 ms :[(NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-12
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 22222 reset in 288 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 22180 reset in 195 ms.
Computed a total of 50 stabilizing places and 43 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 50 transition count 43
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 11 factoid took 268 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 67 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 13 steps (0 resets) in 6 ms. (1 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p1)]
Knowledge based reduction with 11 factoid took 296 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 71 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 112 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
[2024-06-02 18:11:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 18:11:52] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2024-06-02 18:11:52] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 45 ms returned sat
[2024-06-02 18:11:52] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-06-02 18:11:52] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2024-06-02 18:11:52] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 47 ms returned sat
[2024-06-02 18:11:52] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 40/57/40 causal constraints (skipped 2 transitions) in 6 ms.
[2024-06-02 18:11:52] [INFO ] Added : 20 causal constraints over 4 iterations in 71 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p1)
Support contains 1 out of 50 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 50/50 places, 43/43 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 50 /50 variables (removed 0) and now considering 43/43 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-02 18:11:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 18:11:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 86 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 18:11:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 18:11:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 148 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 236 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-02 18:11:52] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 42 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-02 18:11:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 43/92 variables, 49/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/93 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/93 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 93/93 variables, and 58 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved in 1117 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 43/92 variables, 49/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 42/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/93 variables, 1/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/93 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 93/93 variables, and 100 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved in 1229 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2370ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2374ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2621 ms. Remains : 50/50 places, 43/43 transitions.
Computed a total of 50 stabilizing places and 43 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 50 transition count 43
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p1), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 122 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 96 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 15 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (3 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p1), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p1)]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 158 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 93 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 93 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
[2024-06-02 18:11:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 18:11:55] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2024-06-02 18:11:55] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 46 ms returned sat
[2024-06-02 18:11:55] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-06-02 18:11:55] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2024-06-02 18:11:55] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 45 ms returned sat
[2024-06-02 18:11:55] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 40/57/40 causal constraints (skipped 2 transitions) in 6 ms.
[2024-06-02 18:11:55] [INFO ] Added : 20 causal constraints over 4 iterations in 57 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p1)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 104 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 22231 reset in 290 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 22226 reset in 184 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 50 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 50/50 places, 43/43 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 50 transition count 42
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 49 transition count 42
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 48 transition count 41
Applied a total of 4 rules in 10 ms. Remains 48 /50 variables (removed 2) and now considering 41/43 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 41 rows 48 cols
[2024-06-02 18:11:56] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-02 18:11:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 92 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 18:11:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 18:11:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 154 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 248 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-02 18:11:56] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 40 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-02 18:11:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 41/88 variables, 47/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/89 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/89 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 89/89 variables, and 56 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 970 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 48/48 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 41/88 variables, 47/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 40/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/89 variables, 1/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/89 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 89/89 variables, and 96 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 1749 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 48/48 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2768ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2771ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 48/50 places, 41/43 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3037 ms. Remains : 48/50 places, 41/43 transitions.
Treatment of property MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-12 finished in 12089 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((X((p1&&X(X(F(p2)))))&&p0)))'
Support contains 3 out of 98 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 91/91 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 94 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 94 transition count 87
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 93 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 93 transition count 86
Applied a total of 10 rules in 3 ms. Remains 93 /98 variables (removed 5) and now considering 86/91 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 93 cols
[2024-06-02 18:11:59] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-02 18:11:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 160 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 18:11:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 18:12:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 178 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 343 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 85 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-02 18:12:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/93 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 67 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 6/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 60 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 6/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 86/179 variables, 93/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 75 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 6/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 2/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:12:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:12:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/179 variables, 2/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/179 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 179/179 variables, and 124 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved in 7815 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 93/93 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 85/85 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/93 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 23/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 1/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:12:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 1/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 86/179 variables, 93/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 85/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 63 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 59 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 2/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/179 variables, 0/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 179/179 variables, and 213 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved in 9447 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 93/93 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 85/85 constraints, Known Traps: 27/27 constraints]
After SMT, in 17310ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 17313ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 93/98 places, 86/91 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 17659 ms. Remains : 93/98 places, 86/91 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 155 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-13
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 78 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-13 finished in 17837 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((G(p0) U p1)||X(F(p2))))'
Support contains 4 out of 98 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 91/91 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 94 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 94 transition count 87
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 93 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 93 transition count 86
Applied a total of 10 rules in 4 ms. Remains 93 /98 variables (removed 5) and now considering 86/91 (removed 5) transitions.
[2024-06-02 18:12:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 18:12:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 18:12:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 18:12:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 96 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 160 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 85 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-02 18:12:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/93 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 63 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 6/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 6/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 86/179 variables, 93/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 73 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:12:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:12:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 6/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 57 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:12:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 2/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:12:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 63 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:12:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 67 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/179 variables, 2/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/179 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 179/179 variables, and 124 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved in 8804 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 93/93 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 85/85 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/93 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 23/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 1/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 1/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 86/179 variables, 93/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 85/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
[2024-06-02 18:12:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 18:12:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 2/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/179 variables, 0/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 179/179 variables, and 213 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved in 8942 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 93/93 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 85/85 constraints, Known Traps: 27/27 constraints]
After SMT, in 17767ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 17768ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 93/98 places, 86/91 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 17933 ms. Remains : 93/98 places, 86/91 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 152 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))]
Running random walk in product with property : MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-15
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 359 steps with 10 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-15 finished in 18102 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(p0)||F(p1)))'
[2024-06-02 18:12:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-06-02 18:12:35] [INFO ] Export to MCC of 1 properties in file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.sr.xml took 3 ms.
[2024-06-02 18:12:35] [INFO ] Export to PNML in file /home/mcc/execution/model.sr.pnml of net with 98 places, 91 transitions and 253 arcs took 3 ms.
Total runtime 130650 ms.
There are residual formulas that ITS could not solve within timeout
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT PARALLEL_PROCESSING USE_NUPN

BK_STOP 1717351956756

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -timeout 360 -rebuildPNML
mcc2024
ltl formula name MedleyA-PT-03-LTLFireability-12
ltl formula formula --ltl=/tmp/1369/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading model from model.pnml
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Edge label is id
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Petri net has 98 places, 91 transitions and 253 arcs
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Petri net Petri analyzed
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): There are no safe places
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading Petri net took 0.050 real 0.010 user 0.000 sys
pnml2lts-mc( 3/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/1369/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 2/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/1369/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/1369/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/1369/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): buchi has 2 states
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Weak Buchi automaton detected, adding non-accepting as progress label.
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): There are 100 state labels and 1 edge labels
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): State length is 99, there are 99 groups
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Running ufscc using 4 cores
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Using a tree table with 2^25 elements
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Successor permutation: dynamic
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Global bits: 0, count bits: 0, local bits: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): ~29 levels ~10000 states ~45172 transitions
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Empty product with LTL!
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): total scc count: 9070
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): unique states count: 9070
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): unique transitions count: 41430
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - self-loop count: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim dead count: 32484
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim found count: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim success count: 9256
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - cum. max stack depth: 114
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Explored 9256 states 42353 transitions, fanout: 4.576
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Total exploration time 0.120 sec (0.120 sec minimum, 0.120 sec on average)
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): States per second: 77133, Transitions per second: 352942
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Queue width: 12B, total height: 0, memory: 0.00MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Tree memory: 0.1MB, 10.3 B/state, compr.: 2.6%
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Tree fill ratio (roots/leafs): 0.0%/0.0%
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Stored 91 string chucks using 0MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Total memory used for chunk indexing: 0MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Est. total memory use: 0.1MB (~256.0MB paged-in)

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="MedleyA-PT-03"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="ltsminxred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool ltsminxred"
echo " Input is MedleyA-PT-03, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r579-smll-171734921100020"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/MedleyA-PT-03.tgz
mv MedleyA-PT-03 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;