About the Execution of ITS-Tools for MedleyA-PT-06
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
1201.195 | 352216.00 | 401281.00 | 1249.40 | TTTFTTFFTFTTFTFT | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r576-smll-171734919900042.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is MedleyA-PT-06, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r576-smll-171734919900042
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 452K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.1K Jun 2 17:16 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 49K Jun 2 17:16 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.8K Jun 2 17:16 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 55K Jun 2 17:16 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.3K Jun 2 17:12 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K Jun 2 17:12 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K Jun 2 17:12 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Jun 2 17:12 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1 Jun 2 16:33 NewModel
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K Jun 2 17:16 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 134K Jun 2 17:16 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K Jun 2 17:16 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 55K Jun 2 17:16 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Jun 2 17:12 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Jun 2 17:12 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 2 16:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 Jun 2 16:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 2 16:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 33K Jun 2 16:33 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-12
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-13
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-14
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1717355355724
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=MedleyA-PT-06
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-06-02 19:09:18] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-06-02 19:09:18] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-06-02 19:09:18] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 86 ms
[2024-06-02 19:09:18] [INFO ] Transformed 124 places.
[2024-06-02 19:09:18] [INFO ] Transformed 118 transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:09:18] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-06-02 19:09:18] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 124 places and 118 transitions and 372 arcs in 238 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 23 ms.
Support contains 90 out of 124 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 124/124 places, 118/118 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 121 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 121 transition count 115
Applied a total of 6 rules in 35 ms. Remains 121 /124 variables (removed 3) and now considering 115/118 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 115 rows 121 cols
[2024-06-02 19:09:18] [INFO ] Computed 24 invariants in 28 ms
[2024-06-02 19:09:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 365 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 19:09:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 19:09:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 196 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 606 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 114 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:09:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 12/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 3/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
[2024-06-02 19:09:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 141 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 135 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 113 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 91 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 92 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 86 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 68 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 72 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 74 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 20/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
[2024-06-02 19:09:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 68 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 63 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 73 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 67 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 66 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 64 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 66 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 15/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
[2024-06-02 19:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 74 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 3/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
[2024-06-02 19:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 3/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 115/236 variables, 121/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/236 variables, 0/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 236/236 variables, and 186 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved in 10070 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 114/114 constraints, Known Traps: 41/41 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 12/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 3/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 41/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 115/236 variables, 121/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 114/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
[2024-06-02 19:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 61 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 4/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
[2024-06-02 19:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 69 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/236 variables, 1/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/236 variables, 0/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 236/236 variables, and 305 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved in 12425 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 114/114 constraints, Known Traps: 46/46 constraints]
After SMT, in 22621ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 22644ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 121/124 places, 115/118 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 23327 ms. Remains : 121/124 places, 115/118 transitions.
Support contains 90 out of 121 places after structural reductions.
[2024-06-02 19:09:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 46 ms
[2024-06-02 19:09:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2024-06-02 19:09:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 115 transitions.
Support contains 89 out of 121 places (down from 90) after GAL structural reductions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 71 to 70
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1112 resets) in 3059 ms. (13 steps per ms) remains 18/70 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (22 resets) in 73 ms. (54 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (23 resets) in 77 ms. (51 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (27 resets) in 82 ms. (48 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (21 resets) in 40 ms. (97 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (22 resets) in 52 ms. (75 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (24 resets) in 65 ms. (60 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (23 resets) in 35 ms. (111 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (21 resets) in 42 ms. (93 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (34 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (39 resets) in 35 ms. (111 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (22 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (22 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (23 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (31 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (22 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 15/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (24 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
[2024-06-02 19:09:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp46 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 64/92 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 2/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 5/97 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 14 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp21 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 24/121 variables, 10/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 13 unsolved
[2024-06-02 19:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 4/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 115/236 variables, 121/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 13 unsolved
[2024-06-02 19:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/236 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 13 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 236/236 variables, and 150 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 13 unsolved in 981 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 64/87 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 13 unsolved
[2024-06-02 19:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 3/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 8/95 variables, 2/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 13 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp11 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 26/121 variables, 11/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 3/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 12 unsolved
[2024-06-02 19:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 2/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 115/236 variables, 121/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 12/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 12 unsolved
[2024-06-02 19:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 19:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 2/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 12 unsolved
[2024-06-02 19:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/236 variables, 0/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 12 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 236/236 variables, and 170 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 12 unsolved in 1401 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 12/15 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints]
After SMT, in 2404ms problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 12 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 5 properties in 6314 ms.
Support contains 14 out of 121 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 115/115 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 4 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 117 transition count 109
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 111 transition count 109
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 111 transition count 105
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 107 transition count 105
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 96 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 96 transition count 94
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 96 transition count 92
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 94 transition count 92
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 92 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 92 transition count 90
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 91 transition count 88
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 90 transition count 88
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 89 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 89 transition count 87
Performed 15 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 15
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 74 transition count 72
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -1
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 70 transition count 73
Free-agglomeration rule applied 5 times.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 70 transition count 68
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 65 transition count 68
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 3 times.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 65 transition count 65
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 62 transition count 65
Applied a total of 114 rules in 78 ms. Remains 62 /121 variables (removed 59) and now considering 65/115 (removed 50) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 78 ms. Remains : 62/121 places, 65/115 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1908 resets) in 736 ms. (54 steps per ms) remains 2/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 23041 steps (250 resets) in 68 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2024-06-02 19:09:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-06-02 19:09:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-06-02 19:09:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 115 transitions.
Computed a total of 13 stabilizing places and 13 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 115/115 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 6 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 114 transition count 108
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 108 transition count 108
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 108 transition count 102
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 102 transition count 102
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 85 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 85 transition count 74
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 85 transition count 71
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 82 transition count 71
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 80 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 80 transition count 69
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 79 transition count 67
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 78 transition count 67
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 79 place count 77 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 77 transition count 66
Performed 18 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 18
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 59 transition count 48
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 58 transition count 47
Applied a total of 117 rules in 44 ms. Remains 58 /121 variables (removed 63) and now considering 47/115 (removed 68) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 47 rows 58 cols
[2024-06-02 19:09:52] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-02 19:09:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 109 ms returned [8, 13, 30, 34, 38]
[2024-06-02 19:09:52] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [34, 8, 13, 38]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 111 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/121 places, 47/115 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 54 transition count 45
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 52 transition count 45
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 52 transition count 43
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 50 transition count 43
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 48 transition count 41
Applied a total of 12 rules in 11 ms. Remains 48 /54 variables (removed 6) and now considering 41/47 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 41 rows 48 cols
[2024-06-02 19:09:52] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 19:09:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned [17]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 73 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 47/121 places, 41/115 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 47 /47 variables (removed 0) and now considering 41/41 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 243 ms. Remains : 47/121 places, 41/115 transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:09:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 19:09:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 19:09:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 41 transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:09:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 19:09:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 19:09:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1886517425087609409.gal : 3 ms
[2024-06-02 19:09:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9328712918567646697.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1886517425087609409.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9328712918567646697.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,19701,0.027515,3520,2,354,5,1537,6,0,231,966,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG((p45==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(p45==0))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 39/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,0.084467,5188,1,0,15,9053,19,3,1157,5402,14
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 115/115 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 6 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 115 transition count 115
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 106 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 106 transition count 106
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 105 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 105 transition count 105
Applied a total of 26 rules in 9 ms. Remains 105 /121 variables (removed 16) and now considering 105/115 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 105 rows 105 cols
[2024-06-02 19:09:53] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-06-02 19:09:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 109 ms returned [24, 30]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 111 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 103/121 places, 105/115 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 103 /103 variables (removed 0) and now considering 105/105 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 122 ms. Remains : 103/121 places, 105/115 transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:09:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-06-02 19:09:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-06-02 19:09:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 105 transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:09:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-06-02 19:09:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-06-02 19:09:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13277160053524065816.gal : 4 ms
[2024-06-02 19:09:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11584617974120851097.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13277160053524065816.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11584617974120851097.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.3706e+07,0.728506,18676,2,9409,5,65005,6,0,519,73331,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((A(!(AF(((p51==1)&&(p60==1)))) U (p101==1)) * E((E((((p20==1)&&(p26==1))&&((p31==1)&&(p40==1))) U (((p20==1)&&(p26==1))&&((p30==1)&&(...371
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((E(!((p101==1)) U (!(!(!(EG(!(((p51==1)&&(p60==1))))))) * !((p101==1)))) + EG(!((p...591
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t8, t11, t12, t16, t17, t19, t23, t24, t25, t27, t29, t43, t45, t89, t90, t91, t92, t...318
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-06-02 19:10:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 19:10:23] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-06-02 19:10:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16731715148197328449.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16731715148197328449.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16731715148197328449.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16731715148197328449.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16731715148197328449.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-06-02 19:10:23] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-06-02 19:10:23] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-06-02 19:10:23] [INFO ] Removed a total of 4 redundant transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:10:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 85 ms
[2024-06-02 19:10:23] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2024-06-02 19:10:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4558009529291286912.gal : 9 ms
[2024-06-02 19:10:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1048116368938703607.ctl : 6 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4558009529291286912.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1048116368938703607.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.3706e+07,0.658599,18008,1067,367,15979,3084,353,56380,109,82962,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((A(!(AF(((i5.u17.p51==1)&&(i5.u16.p60==1)))) U (i7.u25.p101==1)) * E((E((((u4.p20==1)&&(u4.p26==1))&&((u4.p31==1)&&(u4.p40==1))) U ((...504
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((E(!((i7.u25.p101==1)) U (!(!(!(EG(!(((i5.u17.p51==1)&&(i5.u16.p60==1))))))) * !((...766
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t19, u4.t89, u4.t90, u4.t91, u4.t92, u4.t93, u4.t94, u4.t95, u4.t96, u4.t97, u4.t98, u4.t...454
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,20.4758,468316,1,0,763933,13338,1816,942586,829,89513,953578
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 115/115 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 6 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 114 transition count 108
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 108 transition count 108
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 108 transition count 102
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 102 transition count 102
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 85 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 85 transition count 74
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 85 transition count 71
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 82 transition count 71
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 80 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 80 transition count 69
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 79 transition count 67
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 78 transition count 67
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 79 place count 77 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 77 transition count 66
Performed 19 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 19
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 58 transition count 47
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 57 transition count 46
Applied a total of 119 rules in 32 ms. Remains 57 /121 variables (removed 64) and now considering 46/115 (removed 69) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 46 rows 57 cols
[2024-06-02 19:10:44] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-02 19:10:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 87 ms returned [9, 14, 19, 29, 33, 37, 50]
[2024-06-02 19:10:44] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [50, 33, 9, 14, 19, 37]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 88 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 51/121 places, 46/115 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 51 transition count 43
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 48 transition count 43
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 48 transition count 41
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 46 transition count 41
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 42 transition count 37
Applied a total of 18 rules in 5 ms. Remains 42 /51 variables (removed 9) and now considering 37/46 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 37 rows 42 cols
[2024-06-02 19:10:44] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 19:10:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned [23]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 52 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 41/121 places, 37/115 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 41 transition count 36
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 40 transition count 36
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 40 /41 variables (removed 1) and now considering 36/37 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 36 rows 40 cols
[2024-06-02 19:10:44] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 19:10:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 19:10:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 19:10:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 55 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 101 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 40/121 places, 36/115 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 281 ms. Remains : 40/121 places, 36/115 transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:10:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-02 19:10:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-06-02 19:10:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 36 transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:10:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-02 19:10:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-02 19:10:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7187897608471694235.gal : 2 ms
[2024-06-02 19:10:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2072152089231047274.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7187897608471694235.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2072152089231047274.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,15456,0.009917,3608,2,181,5,793,6,0,199,517,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((p18==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((p18==1)))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 33/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
(forward)formula 0,1,0.036796,4720,1,0,9,7297,20,3,991,4396,8
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 115/115 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 5 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 116 transition count 110
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 111 transition count 110
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 111 transition count 105
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 106 transition count 105
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 101 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 101 transition count 100
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 100 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 100 transition count 99
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 99 transition count 97
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 98 transition count 97
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 86 transition count 85
Applied a total of 65 rules in 16 ms. Remains 86 /121 variables (removed 35) and now considering 85/115 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 86 cols
[2024-06-02 19:10:44] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 19:10:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned [16, 47]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 64 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 84/121 places, 85/115 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 84 transition count 84
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 83 transition count 84
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 82 transition count 83
Applied a total of 4 rules in 5 ms. Remains 82 /84 variables (removed 2) and now considering 83/85 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 82 cols
[2024-06-02 19:10:44] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 19:10:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 19:10:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 19:10:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 19:10:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 166 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 233 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 82/121 places, 83/115 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 318 ms. Remains : 82/121 places, 83/115 transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:10:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-06-02 19:10:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-06-02 19:10:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 83 transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:10:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-06-02 19:10:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-06-02 19:10:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18291661867272885125.gal : 3 ms
[2024-06-02 19:10:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17684323121039717287.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18291661867272885125.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17684323121039717287.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,987990,0.470098,13568,2,7420,5,43840,6,0,413,50764,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((!((!((AG((((p19==1)&&(p25==1))&&((p31==1)&&(p40==1)))) + AF((p76==1)))) * (p58!=1))) * !((((EG((((p20==1)&&(p25==1))&&((p30==1)&&(p39=...533
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((((FwdU(Init,(!((!((!(E(TRUE U !((((p19==1)&&(p25==1))&&((p31==1)&&(p40==1)))))) + !(EG(!((p76==1)))))) * (p58...757
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t4, t7, t10, t14, t16, t18, t28, t29, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t5...296
(forward)formula 0,0,2.80525,74900,1,0,222,354958,197,90,2726,259037,237
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 115/115 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 6 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 114 transition count 108
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 108 transition count 108
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 108 transition count 103
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 103 transition count 103
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 86 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 86 transition count 75
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 86 transition count 72
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 83 transition count 72
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 81 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 81 transition count 70
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 80 transition count 68
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 79 transition count 68
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 78 transition count 67
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 78 transition count 67
Performed 18 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 18
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 60 transition count 49
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 59 transition count 48
Applied a total of 115 rules in 18 ms. Remains 59 /121 variables (removed 62) and now considering 48/115 (removed 67) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 48 rows 59 cols
[2024-06-02 19:10:47] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 19:10:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned [8, 13, 19, 29, 33, 52]
[2024-06-02 19:10:47] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [52, 33, 8, 13, 19]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 61 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/121 places, 48/115 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 54 transition count 47
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 53 transition count 47
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 53 transition count 45
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 51 transition count 45
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 46 transition count 40
Applied a total of 16 rules in 4 ms. Remains 46 /54 variables (removed 8) and now considering 40/48 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 40 rows 46 cols
[2024-06-02 19:10:47] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-06-02 19:10:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned [23]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 49 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 45/121 places, 40/115 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 45 transition count 39
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 44 transition count 39
Applied a total of 2 rules in 1 ms. Remains 44 /45 variables (removed 1) and now considering 39/40 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 44 cols
[2024-06-02 19:10:47] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-06-02 19:10:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 19:10:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 19:10:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 19:10:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 114 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 44/121 places, 39/115 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 247 ms. Remains : 44/121 places, 39/115 transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:10:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-02 19:10:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-06-02 19:10:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 39 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 173 steps (10 resets) in 7 ms. (21 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2024-06-02 19:10:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-02 19:10:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-06-02 19:10:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13691927341064854210.gal : 1 ms
[2024-06-02 19:10:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4010738594621803418.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13691927341064854210.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4010738594621803418.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 115/115 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 5 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 116 transition count 115
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 103 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 103 transition count 102
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 101 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 101 transition count 100
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 100 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 100 transition count 99
Applied a total of 37 rules in 6 ms. Remains 100 /121 variables (removed 21) and now considering 99/115 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 99 rows 100 cols
[2024-06-02 19:10:48] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 19:10:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned [22, 28]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 69 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/121 places, 99/115 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 99/99 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 76 ms. Remains : 98/121 places, 99/115 transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:10:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-02 19:10:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-02 19:10:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 99 transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:10:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-02 19:10:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 19:10:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9948164349261643608.gal : 2 ms
[2024-06-02 19:10:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8123697472367094903.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9948164349261643608.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8123697472367094903.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.34114e+06,0.447525,13128,2,5791,5,43361,6,0,493,45119,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A(!((EX(E(((p41==1)&&(p112==1)) U (p46==1))) * (AF((p17==1)) + !(((p41==1)&&(p112==1)))))) U !(AX(((A((((p19==1)&&(p26==1))&&((p30==1)...235
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!(!(!(EX(!(((!((E(!(((p104==1)&&(p118==1))) U (!((((p19==1)&&(p26==1))&&((p30==1)&&(p40==1)))) *...788
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t9, t14, t16, t20, t21, t22, t24, t26, t41, t83, t84, t85, t86, t87, t88, t89, t90, t91, ...288
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-06-02 19:11:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 19:11:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-06-02 19:11:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3343428117967856608.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3343428117967856608.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3343428117967856608.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3343428117967856608.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3343428117967856608.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-06-02 19:11:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-06-02 19:11:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-06-02 19:11:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 2 redundant transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:11:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-06-02 19:11:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-06-02 19:11:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5467152559665001842.gal : 3 ms
[2024-06-02 19:11:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6656395873241154170.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5467152559665001842.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6656395873241154170.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.34114e+06,0.198076,10332,572,290,9825,2151,331,22958,105,32519,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A(!((EX(E(((i0.u1.p41==1)&&(i9.u26.p112==1)) U (i6.u12.p46==1))) * (AF((i4.u4.p17==1)) + !(((i0.u1.p41==1)&&(i9.u26.p112==1)))))) U !(...321
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!(!(!(EX(!(((!((E(!(((i9.u26.p104==1)&&(i9.u27.p118==1))) U (!((((u6.p19==1)&&(u6.p26==1))&&((u6...1052
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t9, t21, u6.t83, u6.t84, u6.t85, u6.t86, u6.t87, u6.t88, u6.t89, u6.t90, u6.t91, u6.t92, ...380
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,11.5854,316044,1,0,638344,8507,1856,712002,796,87164,815121
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 115/115 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 5 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 116 transition count 115
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 105 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 105 transition count 104
Applied a total of 27 rules in 10 ms. Remains 105 /121 variables (removed 16) and now considering 104/115 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 105 cols
[2024-06-02 19:11:30] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 19:11:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 90 ms returned [31]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 91 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/121 places, 104/115 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 104 /104 variables (removed 0) and now considering 104/104 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 102 ms. Remains : 104/121 places, 104/115 transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:11:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 19:11:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 19:11:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 104 transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:11:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 19:11:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-02 19:11:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7356643960536980255.gal : 5 ms
[2024-06-02 19:11:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9724950680302209638.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7356643960536980255.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9724950680302209638.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.34759e+07,0.453803,13168,2,5552,5,45066,6,0,522,46154,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((((p96==1) * (EF((((((p19==0)||(p25==0))||((p30==0)||(p39==0)))&&(p24==1))||((((p19==1)&&(p25==1))&&((p30==1)&&(p39==1)))&&(((p109==1)...239
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((p96==1) * (E(TRUE U (((((p19==0)||(p25==0))||((p30==0)||(p39==0)))&&(p24==1))||((((p19==...534
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t9, t14, t16, t20, t21, t22, t24, t26, t27, t39, t41, t43, t64, t88, t89, t90, t91, t...317
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-06-02 19:12:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-02 19:12:00] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-06-02 19:12:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17578192950025977830.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17578192950025977830.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17578192950025977830.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17578192950025977830.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17578192950025977830.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-06-02 19:12:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-06-02 19:12:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-06-02 19:12:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 5 redundant transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:12:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-06-02 19:12:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2024-06-02 19:12:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4163336597033012765.gal : 3 ms
[2024-06-02 19:12:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7656233090932502623.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4163336597033012765.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7656233090932502623.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.34759e+07,0.22228,9848,499,421,5840,2949,337,23636,107,40155,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((((i8.u25.p96==1) * (EF((((((u5.p19==0)||(u5.p25==0))||((u5.p30==0)||(u5.p39==0)))&&(i4.u10.p24==1))||((((u5.p19==1)&&(u5.p25==1))&&((...324
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((i8.u25.p96==1) * (E(TRUE U (((((u5.p19==0)||(u5.p25==0))||((u5.p30==0)||(u5.p39==0)))&&(...691
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t9, t16, t21, t64, u5.t88, u5.t89, u5.t90, u5.t91, u5.t92, u5.t93, u5.t94, u5.t95, u5.t96, u5...437
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
(forward)formula 0,0,2.78263,86672,1,0,170991,10990,1760,175585,817,65396,214759
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 115/115 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 6 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 115 transition count 115
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 103 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 103 transition count 103
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 102 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 102 transition count 102
Applied a total of 32 rules in 3 ms. Remains 102 /121 variables (removed 19) and now considering 102/115 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 102 rows 102 cols
[2024-06-02 19:12:03] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 19:12:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned [24, 30]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 84 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 100/121 places, 102/115 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 100 /100 variables (removed 0) and now considering 102/102 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 88 ms. Remains : 100/121 places, 102/115 transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:12:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-02 19:12:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-02 19:12:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 102 transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:12:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 19:12:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 19:12:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3166327004145569788.gal : 2 ms
[2024-06-02 19:12:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2959923605201514411.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3166327004145569788.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2959923605201514411.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28445e+07,0.662219,14200,2,6088,5,48900,6,0,504,50378,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((EX((((p20==1)&&(p25==1))&&((p30==1)&&(p40==1)))) + (p5==1)) + AF(((p51==1)&&(p60==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((EX((((p20==1)&&(p25==1))&&((p30==1)&&(p40==1)))) + (p5==1)))),!(((p51==1)&&(p60==1))...166
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t9, t14, t16, t20, t21, t22, t24, t26, t40, t42, t62, t86, t87, t88, t89, t90, t91, t92, ...301
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 98/0/4
(forward)formula 0,0,3.05373,78592,1,0,295,340943,232,103,3298,320410,287
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 115/115 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 5 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 115 transition count 112
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 113 transition count 109
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 110 transition count 109
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 110 transition count 106
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 107 transition count 106
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 96 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 3 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 96 transition count 95
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 96 transition count 94
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 95 transition count 94
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 94 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 94 transition count 93
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 93 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 93 transition count 92
Performed 15 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 15
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 78 transition count 77
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 78 transition count 77
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 77 transition count 76
Applied a total of 81 rules in 16 ms. Remains 77 /121 variables (removed 44) and now considering 76/115 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 76 rows 77 cols
[2024-06-02 19:12:06] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 19:12:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned [12, 17, 23, 30, 40, 47, 51]
[2024-06-02 19:12:06] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [47, 12, 17, 23, 30, 51]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 69 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 71/121 places, 76/115 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 71 transition count 75
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 70 transition count 74
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 69 transition count 74
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 69 transition count 71
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 66 transition count 71
Applied a total of 10 rules in 6 ms. Remains 66 /71 variables (removed 5) and now considering 71/76 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 71 rows 66 cols
[2024-06-02 19:12:06] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 9 ms
[2024-06-02 19:12:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned [34]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 58 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 65/121 places, 71/115 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 64 transition count 70
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 64 /65 variables (removed 1) and now considering 70/71 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 70 rows 64 cols
[2024-06-02 19:12:06] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 19:12:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 19:12:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 19:12:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 140 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 64/121 places, 70/115 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 294 ms. Remains : 64/121 places, 70/115 transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:12:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-02 19:12:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-02 19:12:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 70 transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:12:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-02 19:12:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-02 19:12:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4190723869512558310.gal : 1 ms
[2024-06-02 19:12:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7289901393991759242.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4190723869512558310.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7289901393991759242.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,302004,0.104276,6348,2,1747,5,12448,6,0,329,14189,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A((!((((!(((p19==1)&&(p25==1))&&((p30==1)&&(p40==1))))||(((p38==1)&&(p3==1))&&(p116==1))) * A((((p20==1)&&(p25==1))&&((p31==1)&&(p40==...438
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!(E(((!((E(!((((p20==1)&&(p25==1))&&((p30==1)&&(p40==1)))) U (!((p123==1)) * !((((p20==1)&&(p25=...1723
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t11, t20, t40, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t56, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t66, Intersection ...239
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,6.09224,170424,1,0,1114,1.10648e+06,212,612,2349,935130,1403
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 115/115 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 6 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 115 transition count 115
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 103 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 103 transition count 103
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 101 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 101 transition count 101
Applied a total of 34 rules in 2 ms. Remains 101 /121 variables (removed 20) and now considering 101/115 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 101 cols
[2024-06-02 19:12:12] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 19:12:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 79 ms returned [22, 28]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 80 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 99/121 places, 101/115 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 99 /99 variables (removed 0) and now considering 101/101 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 82 ms. Remains : 99/121 places, 101/115 transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:12:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-02 19:12:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-02 19:12:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 101 transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:12:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-02 19:12:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-02 19:12:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17297450100724899098.gal : 2 ms
[2024-06-02 19:12:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2820993813198304187.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17297450100724899098.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2820993813198304187.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.90974e+06,0.300883,13400,2,5844,5,43376,6,0,499,46247,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((EX(((((p35==1)&&(p84==1))&&((p54==1)&&(p60==1))) + AX((p61==1)))) * EF((p47==0))) * A((p79==1) U (((p20==1)&&(p25==1))&&((p30==1)&&(...167
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (EX(((((p35==1)&&(p84==1))&&((p54==1)&&(p60==1))) + !(EX(!((p61==1)))))) * E(TRUE U (p47==...351
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t9, t14, t17, t19, t21, t22, t23, t25, t27, t42, t85, t86, t87, t88, t89, t90, t91, t92, ...295
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-06-02 19:12:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-02 19:12:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-06-02 19:12:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph237938431723321982.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph237938431723321982.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph237938431723321982.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph237938431723321982.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph237938431723321982.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-06-02 19:12:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-06-02 19:12:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-06-02 19:12:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 3 redundant transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:12:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-06-02 19:12:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2024-06-02 19:12:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1026148687317853228.gal : 3 ms
[2024-06-02 19:12:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11674523401720762928.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1026148687317853228.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11674523401720762928.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.90974e+06,0.122203,7692,866,328,7999,1645,336,12472,112,5464,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((EX(((((i5.i0.u17.p35==1)&&(i5.i0.u20.p84==1))&&((i3.u15.p54==1)&&(i3.u14.p60==1))) + AX((i3.u14.p61==1)))) * EF((i3.u12.p47==0))) * ...246
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (EX(((((i5.i0.u17.p35==1)&&(i5.i0.u20.p84==1))&&((i3.u15.p54==1)&&(i3.u14.p60==1))) + !(EX...478
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.u4.t85, i0.u4.t86, i0.u4.t87, i0.u4.t88, i0.u4.t89, i0.u4.t90, i0.u4.t91, i0.u4.t92, i0.u4...458
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
(forward)formula 0,0,4.00031,133092,1,0,272523,4635,1857,295286,822,11627,368998
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 115/115 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 5 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 115 transition count 112
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 113 transition count 110
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 111 transition count 110
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 111 transition count 108
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 109 transition count 108
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 99 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 99 transition count 98
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 97 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 97 transition count 96
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 97 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 96 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 96 transition count 94
Performed 17 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 17
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 79 transition count 77
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 78 transition count 76
Applied a total of 79 rules in 12 ms. Remains 78 /121 variables (removed 43) and now considering 76/115 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 76 rows 78 cols
[2024-06-02 19:12:47] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-06-02 19:12:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 79 ms returned [14, 20, 27, 39, 52]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 80 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 73/121 places, 76/115 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 73 transition count 75
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 72 transition count 75
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 72 transition count 74
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 71 transition count 74
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 71 /73 variables (removed 2) and now considering 74/76 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 71 cols
[2024-06-02 19:12:47] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 19:12:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 19:12:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 19:12:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 96 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 153 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 71/121 places, 74/115 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 248 ms. Remains : 71/121 places, 74/115 transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:12:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-02 19:12:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-02 19:12:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 74 transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:12:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-02 19:12:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-06-02 19:12:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5119301667566929312.gal : 1 ms
[2024-06-02 19:12:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5387435341378408172.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5119301667566929312.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5387435341378408172.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,648099,0.105975,6632,2,2028,5,14983,6,0,361,14939,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(AG(EF((p7==0)))) * EF(((p123==1) + ((((E((p79==1) U ((p88==1)&&(p95==1))) + AG((((p107==1)&&(p33==1))&&(p72==1)))) + ((p63==1)||((p21...374
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((Init * EG(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (p7==0))))))),TRUE) * (p123==1))] != FALSE + [(((FwdU((Init * EG(!(E(TR...651
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t8, t10, t13, t14, t45, t46, t47, t48, t50, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t57, t58, t59, t60, ...253
(forward)formula 0,1,4.01954,119136,1,0,365,759755,174,182,2498,619000,390
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 115/115 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 6 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 115 transition count 115
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 99 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 99 transition count 88
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 97 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 97 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 96 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 96 transition count 85
Applied a total of 44 rules in 3 ms. Remains 96 /121 variables (removed 25) and now considering 85/115 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 96 cols
[2024-06-02 19:12:51] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 19:12:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned [20, 25]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 81 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 94/121 places, 85/115 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 94 /94 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 85 ms. Remains : 94/121 places, 85/115 transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:12:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-02 19:12:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-06-02 19:12:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 85 transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:12:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-06-02 19:12:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-02 19:12:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5427116750159040399.gal : 1 ms
[2024-06-02 19:12:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9409043349936888857.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5427116750159040399.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9409043349936888857.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.46079e+06,0.1966,9740,2,4522,5,28401,6,0,463,22932,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG(EF((((p111==1)&&(p57==1))&&(p65==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),E(TRUE U (((p111==1)&&(p57==1))&&(p65==1))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t7, t10, t15, t17, t21, t23, t25, t27, t31, t34, t37, t42, Intersection with reachable a...223
(forward)formula 0,1,16.3182,445172,1,0,564,2.51962e+06,197,298,2751,2.90199e+06,493
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 115/115 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 5 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 116 transition count 115
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 103 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 103 transition count 102
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 101 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 101 transition count 100
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 100 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 100 transition count 99
Applied a total of 37 rules in 3 ms. Remains 100 /121 variables (removed 21) and now considering 99/115 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 99 rows 100 cols
[2024-06-02 19:13:07] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-06-02 19:13:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned [22, 28]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 75 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/121 places, 99/115 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 99/99 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 79 ms. Remains : 98/121 places, 99/115 transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:13:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-02 19:13:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-02 19:13:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 99 transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:13:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-02 19:13:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-02 19:13:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13595559425967637913.gal : 4 ms
[2024-06-02 19:13:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4082600286122401422.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13595559425967637913.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4082600286122401422.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.34114e+06,0.387036,13392,2,5759,5,44982,6,0,493,47356,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(!((!((((p36==1)&&(p73==1)) + AF(((p1==1)&&(p23==1))))) * EF((EF((p47==1)) + AX(((p92==1)&&(p102==1))))))) U (!(EF(((p89==1)&&(p100==1)...369
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU((Init * !(!((E(!((!(E(TRUE U ((p89==1)&&(p100==1)))) * !((E(!(E((((p19==1)&&(p26==1))&&((p31==1)&&(p40=...3499
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t9, t14, t16, t20, t21, t22, t24, t26, t41, t83, t84, t85, t86, t87, t88, t89, t90, t91, ...288
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-06-02 19:13:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-02 19:13:38] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-06-02 19:13:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14126030388395910201.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14126030388395910201.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14126030388395910201.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14126030388395910201.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14126030388395910201.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-06-02 19:13:38] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-06-02 19:13:38] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-06-02 19:13:38] [INFO ] Removed a total of 2 redundant transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:13:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-06-02 19:13:38] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-06-02 19:13:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability194193031435237197.gal : 3 ms
[2024-06-02 19:13:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5257650269910226048.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability194193031435237197.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5257650269910226048.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.34114e+06,0.12246,6888,425,321,5495,1686,321,8738,106,11065,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(!((!((((i6.u9.p36==1)&&(i6.u9.p73==1)) + AF(((i0.u1.p1==1)&&(i2.u7.p23==1))))) * EF((EF((i7.i0.u14.p47==1)) + AX(((i7.i1.u22.p92==1)&&...499
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU((Init * !(!((E(!((!(E(TRUE U ((i8.u24.p89==1)&&(i8.u25.p100==1)))) * !((E(!(E((((u3.p19==1)&&(u3.p26==1...4431
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t9, t16, t21, u3.t83, u3.t84, u3.t85, u3.t86, u3.t87, u3.t88, u3.t89, u3.t90, u3.t91, u3.t92,...383
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,6.70898,200400,1,0,417735,6500,2134,417523,850,31920,573179
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 115/115 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 5 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 116 transition count 115
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 103 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 103 transition count 102
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 101 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 101 transition count 100
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 100 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 100 transition count 99
Applied a total of 37 rules in 3 ms. Remains 100 /121 variables (removed 21) and now considering 99/115 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 99 rows 100 cols
[2024-06-02 19:13:44] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-02 19:13:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 85 ms returned [22, 28]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 87 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/121 places, 99/115 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 99/99 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 91 ms. Remains : 98/121 places, 99/115 transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:13:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-02 19:13:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-02 19:13:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 99 transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:13:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-02 19:13:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-02 19:13:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4483363121349983424.gal : 1 ms
[2024-06-02 19:13:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5399389652181632934.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4483363121349983424.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5399389652181632934.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.34114e+06,0.310966,13128,2,5791,5,43361,6,0,493,45119,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AX((((((p19==1)&&(p25==1))&&((p30==1)&&(p39==1))) + AF(((p104==1)&&(p115==1)))) + A(((p87==1)&&(p102==1)) U ((p41==1)&&(p112==1))))) ...167
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p29==1)) * !(EX(!((((((p19==1)&&(p25==1))&&((p30==1)&&(p39==1))) + !(EG(!(((p104==1)&&(p11...302
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t9, t14, t16, t20, t21, t22, t24, t26, t41, t83, t84, t85, t86, t87, t88, t89, t90, t91, ...288
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-06-02 19:14:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-02 19:14:15] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-06-02 19:14:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8797091246861725944.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8797091246861725944.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8797091246861725944.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8797091246861725944.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8797091246861725944.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-06-02 19:14:15] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-06-02 19:14:15] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-06-02 19:14:15] [INFO ] Removed a total of 3 redundant transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:14:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-06-02 19:14:15] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2024-06-02 19:14:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7311214745000390062.gal : 2 ms
[2024-06-02 19:14:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2113913414133465785.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7311214745000390062.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2113913414133465785.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.34114e+06,0.350158,10876,750,315,11187,2570,339,22253,101,34585,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AX((((((u5.p19==1)&&(u5.p25==1))&&((u5.p30==1)&&(u5.p39==1))) + AF(((i8.u26.p104==1)&&(i8.u27.p115==1)))) + A(((i7.u23.p87==1)&&(i7.u...226
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (i2.u9.p29==1)) * !(EX(!((((((u5.p19==1)&&(u5.p25==1))&&((u5.p30==1)&&(u5.p39==1))) + !(EG(...387
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t9, t16, t21, u5.t83, u5.t84, u5.t85, u5.t86, u5.t87, u5.t88, u5.t89, u5.t90, u5.t91, u5.t92,...379
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
(forward)formula 0,1,10.8707,238972,1,0,410079,7406,1600,428019,722,46287,629666
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 115/115 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 6 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 114 transition count 108
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 108 transition count 108
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 108 transition count 103
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 103 transition count 103
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 86 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 86 transition count 75
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 86 transition count 72
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 83 transition count 72
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 81 transition count 70
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 81 transition count 70
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 80 transition count 68
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 79 transition count 68
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 78 transition count 67
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 78 transition count 67
Performed 19 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 19
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 59 transition count 48
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 58 transition count 47
Applied a total of 117 rules in 17 ms. Remains 58 /121 variables (removed 63) and now considering 47/115 (removed 68) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 47 rows 58 cols
[2024-06-02 19:14:26] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 19:14:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 95 ms returned [10, 15, 20, 30, 34, 38, 51]
[2024-06-02 19:14:26] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [51, 34, 10, 15, 20, 38]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 97 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 52/121 places, 47/115 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 52 transition count 44
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 49 transition count 44
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 49 transition count 42
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 47 transition count 42
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 43 transition count 38
Applied a total of 18 rules in 5 ms. Remains 43 /52 variables (removed 9) and now considering 38/47 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 38 rows 43 cols
[2024-06-02 19:14:26] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 19:14:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned [24]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 78 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 42/121 places, 38/115 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 42 transition count 37
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 41 transition count 37
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 41 /42 variables (removed 1) and now considering 37/38 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 37 rows 41 cols
[2024-06-02 19:14:26] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-06-02 19:14:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 19:14:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 19:14:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 84 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 132 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 41/121 places, 37/115 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 332 ms. Remains : 41/121 places, 37/115 transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:14:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-06-02 19:14:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-06-02 19:14:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 37 transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:14:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-06-02 19:14:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-06-02 19:14:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16360872457422784075.gal : 0 ms
[2024-06-02 19:14:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7442726965928740469.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16360872457422784075.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7442726965928740469.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,15132,0.010622,3612,2,172,5,741,6,0,204,495,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((p15==0))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(p15==0))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 35/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,0.028598,4196,1,0,9,4615,19,3,1011,1857,8
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 115/115 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 6 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 115 transition count 115
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 104 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 104 transition count 104
Applied a total of 28 rules in 1 ms. Remains 104 /121 variables (removed 17) and now considering 104/115 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 104 cols
[2024-06-02 19:14:26] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 19:14:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 88 ms returned [23, 29]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 89 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 102/121 places, 104/115 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 104/104 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 92 ms. Remains : 102/121 places, 104/115 transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:14:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-06-02 19:14:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-02 19:14:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 104 transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:14:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-02 19:14:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-02 19:14:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5220803227987090170.gal : 1 ms
[2024-06-02 19:14:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8106104518188765400.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5220803227987090170.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8106104518188765400.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.42432e+07,0.396429,15264,2,5912,5,51520,6,0,514,54599,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF(E((((!((p6==1)&&(p116==1)))||((p104==1)&&(p118==1)))||((p58==1)&&(p7==1))) U E((((p19==1)&&(p25==1))&&((p31==1)&&(p40==1))) U ((p49...175
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(E((((!((p6==1)&&(p116==1)))||((p104==1)&&(p118==1)))||((p58==1)&&(p7==1))) U E((((p19==1)&&(...226
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t9, t14, t16, t20, t22, t24, t26, t27, t28, t43, t88, t89, t90, t91, t92, t93, t94, t95, ...298
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-06-02 19:14:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-06-02 19:14:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-06-02 19:14:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5017555163677018794.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5017555163677018794.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5017555163677018794.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5017555163677018794.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5017555163677018794.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-06-02 19:14:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-06-02 19:14:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-06-02 19:14:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 6 redundant transitions.
[2024-06-02 19:14:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-06-02 19:14:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 8 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2024-06-02 19:14:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7451507659819486845.gal : 2 ms
[2024-06-02 19:14:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1207289758170772884.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7451507659819486845.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1207289758170772884.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.42432e+07,0.155886,8012,523,304,7704,1752,359,12045,108,12267,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF(E((((!((i8.i0.u3.p6==1)&&(i0.u28.p116==1)))||((i0.u27.p104==1)&&(i0.u28.p118==1)))||((i4.u18.p58==1)&&(i8.i0.u3.p7==1))) U E((((u8....247
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(E((((!((i8.i0.u3.p6==1)&&(i0.u28.p116==1)))||((i0.u27.p104==1)&&(i0.u28.p118==1)))||((i4.u18...298
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t9, u8.t88, u8.t89, u8.t90, u8.t91, u8.t92, u8.t93, u8.t94, u8.t95, u8.t96, u8.t97, u8.t98, u...413
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,11.1623,283628,1,0,552972,6826,1922,675864,786,30048,584936
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-06-CTLFireability-2024-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
[2024-06-02 19:15:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-02 19:15:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Total runtime 349669 ms.
BK_STOP 1717355707940
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="MedleyA-PT-06"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is MedleyA-PT-06, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r576-smll-171734919900042"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/MedleyA-PT-06.tgz
mv MedleyA-PT-06 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;