Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r550-tall-171734898800194.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is FireWire-PT-04, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r550-tall-171734898800194
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 524K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.2K Jun 2 17:16 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 71K Jun 2 17:16 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.1K Jun 2 17:16 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 48K Jun 2 17:16 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.2K Jun 2 17:12 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 23K Jun 2 17:12 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K Jun 2 17:12 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Jun 2 17:12 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1 Jun 2 16:33 NewModel
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K Jun 2 17:16 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 137K Jun 2 17:16 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.9K Jun 2 17:16 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 58K Jun 2 17:16 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Jun 2 17:12 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Jun 2 17:12 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 2 16:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 Jun 2 16:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 2 16:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 89K Jun 2 16:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-12
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-13
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-14
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1717359702208

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=FireWire-PT-04
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-06-02 20:21:43] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-06-02 20:21:43] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-06-02 20:21:43] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 77 ms
[2024-06-02 20:21:43] [INFO ] Transformed 113 places.
[2024-06-02 20:21:43] [INFO ] Transformed 364 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:21:43] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-06-02 20:21:43] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 113 places and 364 transitions and 1349 arcs in 169 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 56 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 56 transitions.
Support contains 72 out of 113 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 113/113 places, 308/308 transitions.
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 6 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 6 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 113 transition count 302
Applied a total of 6 rules in 26 ms. Remains 113 /113 variables (removed 0) and now considering 302/308 (removed 6) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:21:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 276 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 276 rows 113 cols
[2024-06-02 20:21:43] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 18 ms
[2024-06-02 20:21:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 203 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:21:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 276 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:21:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:21:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:21:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 209 ms returned [61, 111]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 440 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 111/113 places, 302/308 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 111 /111 variables (removed 0) and now considering 302/302 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 487 ms. Remains : 111/113 places, 302/308 transitions.
Support contains 72 out of 111 places after structural reductions.
[2024-06-02 20:21:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 46 ms
[2024-06-02 20:21:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2024-06-02 20:21:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 302 transitions.
Support contains 70 out of 111 places (down from 72) after GAL structural reductions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 74 to 72
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2263 resets) in 1844 ms. (21 steps per ms) remains 40/72 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 48 ms. (81 steps per ms) remains 40/40 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 83 ms. (47 steps per ms) remains 40/40 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (19 resets) in 35 ms. (111 steps per ms) remains 40/40 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (51 resets) in 60 ms. (65 steps per ms) remains 40/40 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (51 resets) in 71 ms. (55 steps per ms) remains 40/40 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (57 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 40/40 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (11 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 40/40 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (59 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 40/40 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (9 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 35/40 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (54 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (49 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (45 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (47 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (53 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (64 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 34/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (53 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (77 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (67 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (61 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (68 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (9 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (9 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (9 resets) in 33 ms. (117 steps per ms) remains 31/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (11 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (10 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (9 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (10 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (99 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (9 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (54 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (9 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (22 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (76 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
[2024-06-02 20:21:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 276 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 276 rows 111 cols
[2024-06-02 20:21:45] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-06-02 20:21:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp15 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp63 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp67 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp71 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 67/104 variables, 5/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 67/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
[2024-06-02 20:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 20:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 69 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 20:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 3/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
[2024-06-02 20:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 2/106 variables, 1/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 2/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
[2024-06-02 20:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 272/378 variables, 106/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 38/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 5/383 variables, 3/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 3/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 3/386 variables, 2/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/386 variables, 2/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/386 variables, 0/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 1/387 variables, 1/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 0/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 0/387 variables, 0/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 387/387 variables, and 273 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved in 2129 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 111/111 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 111/111 constraints, ReadFeed: 40/40 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 31/31 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 35/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 69/104 variables, 5/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 69/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 4/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 2/106 variables, 1/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 2/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
[2024-06-02 20:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 1/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 272/378 variables, 106/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 38/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 27/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 5/383 variables, 3/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 3/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 3/386 variables, 2/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/386 variables, 2/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/386 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 1/387 variables, 1/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 0/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 0/387 variables, 0/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 387/387 variables, and 301 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved in 3895 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 111/111 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 111/111 constraints, ReadFeed: 40/40 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 27/31 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 6120ms problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 27 unsolved
Fused 27 Parikh solutions to 26 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 2677 ms.
Support contains 35 out of 111 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 302/302 transitions.
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 111 transition count 298
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 110 transition count 298
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 110 transition count 297
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 109 transition count 297
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 108 transition count 295
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 108 transition count 295
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -4
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 106 transition count 299
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 106 transition count 295
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 106 transition count 293
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 106 transition count 295
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 105 transition count 293
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 105 transition count 291
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 105 transition count 291
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 105 transition count 290
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 104 transition count 289
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 104 transition count 289
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 104 transition count 287
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 103 transition count 286
Applied a total of 33 rules in 106 ms. Remains 103 /111 variables (removed 8) and now considering 286/302 (removed 16) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 106 ms. Remains : 103/111 places, 286/302 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2571 resets) in 633 ms. (63 steps per ms) remains 25/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (20 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (59 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (75 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (73 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (52 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (59 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (49 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (55 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (52 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (60 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (58 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (56 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (51 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (78 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (10 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (9 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (32 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (9 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 24/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (139 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (77 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (9 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (15 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (56 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 24/24 properties
[2024-06-02 20:21:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 260 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 260 rows 103 cols
[2024-06-02 20:21:54] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:21:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 39 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 66/98 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
[2024-06-02 20:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 20:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 20:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 20:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 4/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
[2024-06-02 20:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 259/357 variables, 98/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/357 variables, 39/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/357 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 5/362 variables, 4/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/362 variables, 1/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/362 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/363 variables, 1/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/363 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/363 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 363/363 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 1211 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 103/103 constraints, ReadFeed: 39/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 66/98 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 5/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 259/357 variables, 98/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/357 variables, 39/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/357 variables, 24/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/357 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 5/362 variables, 4/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/362 variables, 1/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
[2024-06-02 20:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/362 variables, 1/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/362 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 1/363 variables, 1/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/363 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/363 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 363/363 variables, and 178 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 2941 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 103/103 constraints, ReadFeed: 39/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 4193ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 1265 ms.
Support contains 32 out of 103 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 103/103 places, 286/286 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 103 /103 variables (removed 0) and now considering 286/286 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 7 ms. Remains : 103/103 places, 286/286 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2647 resets) in 255 ms. (156 steps per ms) remains 23/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (13 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (53 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (60 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (69 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (76 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (72 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (78 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (69 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (67 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (77 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (58 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (50 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (63 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (9 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 22/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (10 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (13 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (146 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (64 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (9 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (68 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 112586 steps, run visited all 22 properties in 442 ms. (steps per millisecond=254 )
Probabilistic random walk after 112586 steps, saw 26826 distinct states, run finished after 446 ms. (steps per millisecond=252 ) properties seen :22
Successfully simplified 4 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
FORMULA FireWire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-06-02 20:22:00] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2024-06-02 20:22:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
FORMULA FireWire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-06-02 20:22:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 302 transitions.
Support contains 64 out of 111 places (down from 67) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 6 stabilizing places and 9 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 302/302 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 110 transition count 300
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 110 transition count 300
Applied a total of 2 rules in 5 ms. Remains 110 /111 variables (removed 1) and now considering 300/302 (removed 2) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:22:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 274 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 274 rows 110 cols
[2024-06-02 20:22:00] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:22:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 274 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:22:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:22:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:22:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 169 ms returned [36, 104]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 228 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 108/111 places, 300/302 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 108 /108 variables (removed 0) and now considering 300/300 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 237 ms. Remains : 108/111 places, 300/302 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:22:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 300 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:22:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8574329994803470200.gal : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2051794409686802996.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8574329994803470200.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2051794409686802996.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.47708e+06,2.81047,83600,2,3904,5,236950,6,0,731,215509,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX(((((p5==1)&&(p86==1))||((p7==1)&&(p82==1)))||(((p74==1)&&(p6==1))&&(p50==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * ((((p5==1)&&(p86==1))||((p7==1)&&(p82==1)))||(((p74==1)&&(p6==1))&&(p50==1))))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 0,1,2.91836,83860,1,0,8,236950,8,1,1344,215509,2
FORMULA FireWire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 302/302 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 111 transition count 301
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 110 transition count 301
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 110 transition count 300
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 109 transition count 300
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 108 transition count 298
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 108 transition count 298
Applied a total of 6 rules in 23 ms. Remains 108 /111 variables (removed 3) and now considering 298/302 (removed 4) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:22:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 272 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 272 rows 108 cols
[2024-06-02 20:22:04] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:22:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 272 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:22:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:22:04] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:22:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 148 ms returned [36, 104]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 222 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 106/111 places, 298/302 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 106 /106 variables (removed 0) and now considering 298/298 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 253 ms. Remains : 106/111 places, 298/302 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:22:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 298 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:22:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16814467323504961321.gal : 4 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8728727519691251871.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16814467323504961321.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8728727519691251871.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2422 resets) in 319 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...329
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 149 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8728727519691251871.prop.
Finished probabilistic random walk after 213 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=42 )
Probabilistic random walk after 213 steps, saw 163 distinct states, run finished after 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=42 ) properties seen :1
FORMULA FireWire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL PROBABILISTIC_WALK
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 302/302 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 111 transition count 301
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 110 transition count 301
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 110 transition count 300
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 109 transition count 300
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 108 transition count 298
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 108 transition count 298
Applied a total of 6 rules in 16 ms. Remains 108 /111 variables (removed 3) and now considering 298/302 (removed 4) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:22:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 272 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:22:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:22:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:22:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 272 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:22:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:22:04] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:22:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 160 ms returned [36, 104]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 218 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 106/111 places, 298/302 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 106 /106 variables (removed 0) and now considering 298/298 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 245 ms. Remains : 106/111 places, 298/302 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:22:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 298 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:22:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5014802047459416553.gal : 2 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12046466571840125157.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5014802047459416553.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12046466571840125157.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.11209e+06,2.82415,86472,2,3905,5,246107,6,0,721,225845,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((p12==1)&&(p53==1)) U E(!(((p54==1) + AF((((p2==1)&&(p15==1))||((p5==1)&&(p55==1)))))) U AG(A(!(((p7==1)&&(p76==1))) U !(((p3==1)&&(p4...166
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(!(((p54==1) + !(EG(!((((p2==1)&&(p15==1))||((p5==1)&&(p55==1)))))))) U !(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(!(...760
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t7, t8, t10, t15, t16, t17, t18, t20, t22, t27, t28, t29, t30, t32, t34, t39, t40, t4...589
(forward)formula 0,1,21.3903,600072,1,0,695,3.23522e+06,638,363,6135,2.76582e+06,813
FORMULA FireWire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 302/302 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 110 transition count 300
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 110 transition count 300
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 110 /111 variables (removed 1) and now considering 300/302 (removed 2) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:22:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 274 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 274 rows 110 cols
[2024-06-02 20:22:26] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:22:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 274 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:22:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:22:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:22:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 161 ms returned [36, 104]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 212 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 108/111 places, 300/302 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 108 /108 variables (removed 0) and now considering 300/300 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 218 ms. Remains : 108/111 places, 300/302 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:22:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 300 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:22:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1605963054480496173.gal : 3 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5552050778215478926.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1605963054480496173.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5552050778215478926.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.47708e+06,2.72566,83700,2,3904,5,236950,6,0,731,215509,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG((AG((!(A((p24==1) U ((p3==1)&&(p41==1)))) + AX(((p2==0)||(p21==0))))) * EG(AG(EX(((p2==1)&&(p94==1))))))) + EF(((p3==1)&&(p72==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((FwdU(FwdU((Init * !(E(TRUE U ((p3==1)&&(p72==1))))),TRUE),TRUE) * !(!(!((E(!(((p3==1)&&(p41==1))) U (!((p...376
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t7, t8, t10, t15, t16, t17, t18, t20, t22, t27, t28, t29, t30, t32, t34, t39, t40, t4...589
(forward)formula 0,1,29.0867,761920,1,0,735,3.90463e+06,638,389,6262,3.26069e+06,868
FORMULA FireWire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 302/302 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 110 transition count 300
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 110 transition count 300
Applied a total of 2 rules in 8 ms. Remains 110 /111 variables (removed 1) and now considering 300/302 (removed 2) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:22:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 274 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:22:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:22:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:22:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 274 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:22:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:22:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:22:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 146 ms returned [36]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 202 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 109/111 places, 300/302 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 109 /109 variables (removed 0) and now considering 300/300 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 211 ms. Remains : 109/111 places, 300/302 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:22:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 300 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:22:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8670500100947705155.gal : 2 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18232463511316272331.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8670500100947705155.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18232463511316272331.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.47708e+06,2.74327,84448,2,3892,5,232893,6,0,735,220089,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((EF((EX(((p7==0)||(p89==0))) * A(((p7==1)&&(p79==1)) U E(((p2==1)&&(p94==1)) U ((p2==1)&&(p17==1)))))) * EF((((A(((p5==1)&&(p60==1)) ...253
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((E(TRUE U (EX(((p7==0)||(p89==0))) * !((E(!(E(((p2==1)&&(p94==1)) U ((p2==1)&&(p17==1)))) U (!(((p7=...494
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t7, t8, t10, t15, t16, t17, t18, t20, t22, t27, t28, t29, t30, t32, t34, t39, t40, t4...589
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-06-02 20:23:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-06-02 20:23:26] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-06-02 20:23:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17960649449366259295.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17960649449366259295.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17960649449366259295.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17960649449366259295.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17960649449366259295.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-06-02 20:23:26] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-06-02 20:23:26] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-06-02 20:23:26] [INFO ] Removed a total of 454 redundant transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:23:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 48 ms
[2024-06-02 20:23:26] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 97 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2024-06-02 20:23:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13979965503748236924.gal : 4 ms
[2024-06-02 20:23:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9964489652815892548.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13979965503748236924.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9964489652815892548.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.47708e+06,4.464,132552,2116,185,182233,1727,605,617899,86,17699,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((EF((EX(((i5.u2.p7==0)||(i7.u30.p89==0))) * A(((i5.u2.p7==1)&&(i6.u27.p79==1)) U E(((i1.u0.p2==1)&&(i1.u32.p94==1)) U ((i1.u0.p2==1)&...386
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((E(TRUE U (EX(((i5.u2.p7==0)||(i7.u30.p89==0))) * !((E(!(E(((i1.u0.p2==1)&&(i1.u32.p94==1)) U ((i1.u...711
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t42, t44, t45, t48, t49, t52, t57, t58, t63, t68, t73, t78, t92, t94, t95, t96, t97, t134...694
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 302/302 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 110 transition count 300
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 110 transition count 300
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 110 /111 variables (removed 1) and now considering 300/302 (removed 2) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:23:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 274 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:23:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:23:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:23:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 274 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:23:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:23:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:23:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 138 ms returned [36]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 201 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 109/111 places, 300/302 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 109 /109 variables (removed 0) and now considering 300/300 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 207 ms. Remains : 109/111 places, 300/302 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:23:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-06-02 20:23:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-06-02 20:23:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 300 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:23:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-06-02 20:23:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-06-02 20:23:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17434204830600139841.gal : 1 ms
[2024-06-02 20:23:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16721657777095256900.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17434204830600139841.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16721657777095256900.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.47708e+06,2.68242,84484,2,3892,5,232893,6,0,735,220089,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!((!(((AF(((p3==1)&&(p66==1))) + !((((p72==1)&&(p106==1))||((p8==1)&&(p92==1))))) + (!(((p2==1)&&(p96==1))) * A(((p2==1)&&(p15==1)) U (...441
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(FwdU(Init,!((!(((!(EG(!(((p3==1)&&(p66==1))))) + !((((p72==1)&&(p106==1))||((p8==1)&&(p92==1))))) + (!(...1558
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t7, t8, t10, t15, t16, t17, t18, t20, t22, t27, t28, t29, t30, t32, t34, t39, t40, t4...589
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-06-02 20:24:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-06-02 20:24:26] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-06-02 20:24:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12817215442319390451.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12817215442319390451.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12817215442319390451.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12817215442319390451.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12817215442319390451.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-06-02 20:24:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-06-02 20:24:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-06-02 20:24:27] [INFO ] Removed a total of 454 redundant transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:24:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2024-06-02 20:24:27] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 89 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2024-06-02 20:24:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7580248637522571235.gal : 2 ms
[2024-06-02 20:24:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5811586012083307182.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7580248637522571235.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5811586012083307182.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.47708e+06,1.6786,60228,2084,189,80421,1291,571,298768,83,11138,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!((!(((AF(((i3.i0.u1.p3==1)&&(i3.i0.u23.p66==1))) + !((((i3.i0.u25.p72==1)&&(i3.i0.u36.p106==1))||((i1.i0.u3.p8==1)&&(i0.u30.p92==1))))...673
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(FwdU(Init,!((!(((!(EG(!(((i3.i0.u1.p3==1)&&(i3.i0.u23.p66==1))))) + !((((i3.i0.u25.p72==1)&&(i3.i0.u36....2234
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t42, t44, t45, t48, t49, t52, t57, t58, t63, t68, t73, t78, t92, t94, t95, t96, t97, t134...691
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
(forward)formula 0,1,26.6217,750520,1,0,1.05387e+06,6665,3114,3.32596e+06,393,49878,2670453
FORMULA FireWire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 302/302 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 110 transition count 300
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 110 transition count 300
Applied a total of 2 rules in 1 ms. Remains 110 /111 variables (removed 1) and now considering 300/302 (removed 2) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:24:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 274 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:24:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:24:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:24:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 274 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:24:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:24:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:24:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 155 ms returned [36, 104]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 222 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 108/111 places, 300/302 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 108 /108 variables (removed 0) and now considering 300/300 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 224 ms. Remains : 108/111 places, 300/302 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:24:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-06-02 20:24:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:24:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 300 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:24:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:24:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-06-02 20:24:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4524298990821665919.gal : 2 ms
[2024-06-02 20:24:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7678115036277772155.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4524298990821665919.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7678115036277772155.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.47708e+06,2.67733,83948,2,3904,5,236950,6,0,731,215509,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((p8==1)&&(p102==1)) U (AX(E((p82!=1) U ((AG(((p49==1)&&(p62==1))) * (p8==1)) * (p38==1)))) + AG(((!(((((p3==1)&&(p103==1))||((p2==1)&&...284
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,((p8==1)&&(p102==1))) * !(EX(!(E((p82!=1) U ((!(E(TRUE U !(((p49==1)&&(p62==1))))) * (p8==1)) * (p3...480
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t7, t8, t10, t15, t16, t17, t18, t20, t22, t27, t28, t29, t30, t32, t34, t39, t40, t4...589
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 247/51/53
(forward)formula 0,0,20.805,591220,1,0,697,3.10087e+06,649,368,6364,2.78133e+06,809
FORMULA FireWire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 302/302 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 110 transition count 300
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 110 transition count 300
Applied a total of 2 rules in 1 ms. Remains 110 /111 variables (removed 1) and now considering 300/302 (removed 2) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:25:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 274 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:25:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:25:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:25:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 274 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:25:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:25:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:25:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 165 ms returned [36, 104]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 228 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 108/111 places, 300/302 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 108 /108 variables (removed 0) and now considering 300/300 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 230 ms. Remains : 108/111 places, 300/302 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:25:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:25:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:25:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 300 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:25:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-06-02 20:25:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:25:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14897088374984782791.gal : 2 ms
[2024-06-02 20:25:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12937946119281871391.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14897088374984782791.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12937946119281871391.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.47708e+06,2.61167,83852,2,3904,5,236950,6,0,731,215509,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EX(AX((EF((p49==1)) * EF(((p8==1)&&(p69==1)))))) U EF(((p6==1)&&(p80==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU(Init,EX(!(EX(!((E(TRUE U (p49==1)) * E(TRUE U ((p8==1)&&(p69==1))))))))),TRUE) * ((p6==1)&&(p80==1))...166
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t7, t8, t10, t15, t16, t17, t18, t20, t22, t27, t28, t29, t30, t32, t34, t39, t40, t4...589
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-06-02 20:25:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-06-02 20:25:45] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-06-02 20:25:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6630231788394688089.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6630231788394688089.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6630231788394688089.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6630231788394688089.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6630231788394688089.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-06-02 20:25:45] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-06-02 20:25:45] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-06-02 20:25:45] [INFO ] Removed a total of 454 redundant transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:25:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-06-02 20:25:45] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 81 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2024-06-02 20:25:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13493542061877719532.gal : 2 ms
[2024-06-02 20:25:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3729323398196158768.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13493542061877719532.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3729323398196158768.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.47708e+06,8.68075,290140,2212,208,296811,3708,594,2.47338e+06,86,36376,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EX(AX((EF((i2.u17.p49==1)) * EF(((i4.i0.u3.p8==1)&&(i4.i3.u23.p69==1)))))) U EF(((i2.u2.p6==1)&&(i6.u35.p80==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU(Init,EX(!(EX(!((E(TRUE U (i2.u17.p49==1)) * E(TRUE U ((i4.i0.u3.p8==1)&&(i4.i3.u23.p69==1))))))))),T...205
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t42, t44, t48, t49, t57, t58, t63, t68, t73, t78, t92, t94, t143, t148, t150, t151, t152,...706
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 302/302 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 110 transition count 300
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 110 transition count 300
Applied a total of 2 rules in 5 ms. Remains 110 /111 variables (removed 1) and now considering 300/302 (removed 2) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:26:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 274 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:26:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:26:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:26:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 274 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:26:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:26:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:26:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 163 ms returned [36, 104]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 219 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 108/111 places, 300/302 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 108 /108 variables (removed 0) and now considering 300/300 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 225 ms. Remains : 108/111 places, 300/302 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:26:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:26:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-06-02 20:26:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 300 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:26:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:26:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:26:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12974722876942050854.gal : 1 ms
[2024-06-02 20:26:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15438415793907662000.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12974722876942050854.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15438415793907662000.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.47708e+06,2.6807,83820,2,3904,5,236950,6,0,731,215509,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG((((p2==0)||(p96==0)) * EF(EG(((p8==0)||(p83==0)))))) + AX(((p7==1)&&(p75==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !(!(E(TRUE U !((((p2==0)||(p96==0)) * E(TRUE U EG(((p8==0)||(p83==0))))))))))) * !(((p7==1)&&(p75==...169
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t7, t8, t10, t15, t16, t17, t18, t20, t22, t27, t28, t29, t30, t32, t34, t39, t40, t4...589
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-06-02 20:26:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-06-02 20:26:45] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-06-02 20:26:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10668880220195985935.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10668880220195985935.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10668880220195985935.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10668880220195985935.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10668880220195985935.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-06-02 20:26:45] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-06-02 20:26:45] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-06-02 20:26:45] [INFO ] Removed a total of 454 redundant transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:26:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-06-02 20:26:45] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 84 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2024-06-02 20:26:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13240368210784270526.gal : 2 ms
[2024-06-02 20:26:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6737032106689028737.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13240368210784270526.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6737032106689028737.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.47708e+06,2.2437,73204,1712,196,114020,1586,592,276078,86,14076,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG((((i0.i0.u0.p2==0)||(i0.i0.u33.p96==0)) * EF(EG(((i1.u3.p8==0)||(i6.u27.p83==0)))))) + AX(((i4.u2.p7==1)&&(i6.u25.p75==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !(!(E(TRUE U !((((i0.i0.u0.p2==0)||(i0.i0.u33.p96==0)) * E(TRUE U EG(((i1.u3.p8==0)||(i6.u27.p83==0...214
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t42, t44, t45, t48, t49, t52, t57, t58, t63, t68, t73, t78, t92, t94, t95, t96, t97, t134...706
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
(forward)formula 0,0,9.45574,260116,1,0,392680,5559,3092,1.03488e+06,402,39139,1081554
FORMULA FireWire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 302/302 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 110 transition count 300
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 110 transition count 300
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 110 /111 variables (removed 1) and now considering 300/302 (removed 2) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:26:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 274 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:26:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:26:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:26:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 274 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:26:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:26:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:26:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 173 ms returned [36, 104]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 231 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 108/111 places, 300/302 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 108 /108 variables (removed 0) and now considering 300/300 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 236 ms. Remains : 108/111 places, 300/302 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:26:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-06-02 20:26:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:26:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 300 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:26:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:26:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:26:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1569410184565253693.gal : 1 ms
[2024-06-02 20:26:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18011636311087845386.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1569410184565253693.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18011636311087845386.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.47708e+06,2.71206,83736,2,3904,5,236950,6,0,731,215509,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(E(AF(!(((p8==1)&&(p40==1)))) U !((((((p7==1)&&(p27==1))||(p79==1))||((p3==1)&&(p47==1)))&&(((!((p7==1)&&(p80==1)))||((p2==1)&&(p42==1)...301
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(E(!(EG(!(!(((p8==1)&&(p40==1)))))) U !((((((p7==1)&&(p27==1))||(p79==1))||((p3==1)&&(p47==1)))&&((...471
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t7, t8, t10, t15, t16, t17, t18, t20, t22, t27, t28, t29, t30, t32, t34, t39, t40, t4...589
(forward)formula 0,0,21.2137,590592,1,0,683,3.12563e+06,626,358,6165,2.77238e+06,785
FORMULA FireWire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 302/302 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 110 transition count 300
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 110 transition count 300
Applied a total of 2 rules in 5 ms. Remains 110 /111 variables (removed 1) and now considering 300/302 (removed 2) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:27:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 274 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:27:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:27:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:27:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 274 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:27:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:27:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:27:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 148 ms returned [36, 104]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 204 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 108/111 places, 300/302 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 108 /108 variables (removed 0) and now considering 300/300 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 211 ms. Remains : 108/111 places, 300/302 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:27:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:27:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:27:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 300 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:27:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:27:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:27:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1953543746902025840.gal : 1 ms
[2024-06-02 20:27:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6617810235412598721.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1953543746902025840.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6617810235412598721.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.47708e+06,2.66458,83612,2,3904,5,236950,6,0,731,215509,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX(AG(((p7==1)&&(p90==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(E(TRUE U !(((p7==1)&&(p90==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t7, t8, t10, t15, t16, t17, t18, t20, t22, t27, t28, t29, t30, t32, t34, t39, t40, t4...589
(forward)formula 0,0,4.04728,86004,1,0,520,332918,619,272,6174,271458,607
FORMULA FireWire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 302/302 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 110 transition count 300
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 109 transition count 300
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 109 transition count 299
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 108 transition count 299
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 107 transition count 297
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 107 transition count 297
Applied a total of 6 rules in 24 ms. Remains 107 /111 variables (removed 4) and now considering 297/302 (removed 5) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:27:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 271 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 271 rows 107 cols
[2024-06-02 20:27:21] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-06-02 20:27:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:27:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 271 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:27:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:27:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:27:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 139 ms returned [35, 103]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 197 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 105/111 places, 297/302 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 297/297 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 228 ms. Remains : 105/111 places, 297/302 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:27:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:27:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:27:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 297 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:27:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:27:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:27:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2729937859648535476.gal : 1 ms
[2024-06-02 20:27:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9548386176212326623.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2729937859648535476.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9548386176212326623.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.11208e+06,0.868416,35992,2,2982,5,88163,6,0,716,95934,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E((((p74!=1)||((p5==1)&&(p82==1)))||(((p53!=1)&&(p2==1))&&(p100==1))) U E(!((AG(((p8==1)&&(p44==1))) * AF(((p6==1)&&(p86==1))))) U (p4...162
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E((((p74!=1)||((p5==1)&&(p82==1)))||(((p53!=1)&&(p2==1))&&(p100==1))) U E(!((!(E(TRUE U !(...234
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t2, t6, t7, t9, t14, t15, t16, t17, t19, t21, t26, t27, t28, t29, t31, t33, t38, t39, t40...588
(forward)formula 0,1,17.3501,503684,1,0,664,2.80431e+06,626,347,6119,2.4065e+06,775
FORMULA FireWire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 302/302 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 110 transition count 300
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 109 transition count 300
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 109 transition count 299
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 108 transition count 299
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 107 transition count 297
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 107 transition count 297
Applied a total of 6 rules in 11 ms. Remains 107 /111 variables (removed 4) and now considering 297/302 (removed 5) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:27:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 271 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:27:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:27:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:27:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 271 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:27:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:27:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:27:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 124 ms returned [35, 103]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 183 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 105/111 places, 297/302 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 297/297 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 199 ms. Remains : 105/111 places, 297/302 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:27:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:27:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:27:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 297 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:27:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:27:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:27:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability100670719880826056.gal : 2 ms
[2024-06-02 20:27:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12620990993101594158.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability100670719880826056.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12620990993101594158.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.11208e+06,0.940702,35740,2,2982,5,88163,6,0,716,95934,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(((p75==1) * !(E(((p7==1)&&(p52==1)) U !(((p3==1)&&(p66==1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(((p75==1) * !(E(((p7==1)&&(p52==1)) U !(((p3==1)&&(p66==1))))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t2, t6, t7, t9, t14, t15, t16, t17, t19, t21, t26, t27, t28, t29, t31, t33, t38, t39, t40...588
(forward)formula 0,0,2.73995,81200,1,0,518,316292,618,273,6075,317481,609
FORMULA FireWire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 302/302 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 110 transition count 300
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 109 transition count 300
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 109 transition count 299
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 108 transition count 299
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 107 transition count 297
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 107 transition count 297
Applied a total of 6 rules in 15 ms. Remains 107 /111 variables (removed 4) and now considering 297/302 (removed 5) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:27:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 271 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:27:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:27:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:27:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 271 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:27:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:27:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:27:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 141 ms returned [35, 103]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 199 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 105/111 places, 297/302 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 297/297 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 220 ms. Remains : 105/111 places, 297/302 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:27:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:27:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:27:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 297 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:27:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:27:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:27:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16807604654012638023.gal : 1 ms
[2024-06-02 20:27:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18117167601441198806.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16807604654012638023.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18117167601441198806.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.11208e+06,0.908258,36040,2,2982,5,88163,6,0,716,95934,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(((p11==1)&&(p59==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((p11==1)&&(p59==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t2, t6, t7, t9, t14, t15, t16, t17, t19, t21, t26, t27, t28, t29, t31, t33, t38, t39, t40...588
(forward)formula 0,0,22.4748,628156,1,0,582,2.96658e+06,612,304,5959,2.06107e+06,684
FORMULA FireWire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2024-06-02 20:28:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-06-02 20:28:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:28:05] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-06-02 20:28:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9026302807598624151.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9026302807598624151.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9026302807598624151.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9026302807598624151.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9026302807598624151.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-06-02 20:28:05] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-06-02 20:28:05] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-06-02 20:28:05] [INFO ] Removed a total of 454 redundant transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:28:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-06-02 20:28:05] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 100 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2024-06-02 20:28:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15289645464760726401.gal : 2 ms
[2024-06-02 20:28:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12834530000876429164.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15289645464760726401.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12834530000876429164.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 2 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.48693e+06,21.8136,429304,1925,206,406134,3250,603,2.80921e+06,88,40773,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((EF((EX(((i6.i0.u2.p7==0)||(i7.u29.p89==0))) * A(((i6.i0.u2.p7==1)&&(i6.i1.u35.p79==1)) U E(((i0.u0.p2==1)&&(i0.u31.p94==1)) U ((i0.u...389
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((E(TRUE U (EX(((i6.i0.u2.p7==0)||(i7.u29.p89==0))) * !((E(!(E(((i0.u0.p2==1)&&(i0.u31.p94==1)) U ((i...714
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t44, t46, t47, t50, t51, t54, t56, t59, t60, t65, t70, t75, t80, t94, t96, t97, t98, t99,...702
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
(forward)formula 0,1,53.4711,925468,1,0,1.1742e+06,8430,3235,5.37098e+06,412,56695,2693793
FORMULA FireWire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: E(EX(AX((EF((i5.u17.p49==1)) * EF(((i4.i0.u3.p8==1)&&(i1.u23.p69==1)))))) U EF(((i6.i0.u2.p6==1)&&(i6.i1.u35.p80==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU(Init,EX(!(EX(!((E(TRUE U (i5.u17.p49==1)) * E(TRUE U ((i4.i0.u3.p8==1)&&(i1.u23.p69==1))))))))),TRUE...208
(forward)formula 1,1,86.389,1552348,1,0,1.9574e+06,10271,3667,8.42787e+06,440,79697,4829311
FORMULA FireWire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Total runtime 468657 ms.

BK_STOP 1717360171989

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="FireWire-PT-04"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is FireWire-PT-04, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r550-tall-171734898800194"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/FireWire-PT-04.tgz
mv FireWire-PT-04 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;