About the Execution of ITS-Tools for FireWire-PT-04
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
1281.319 | 390602.00 | 430110.00 | 1051.20 | TFTFFTFTFTFFFTTF | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r550-tall-171734898800193.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is FireWire-PT-04, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r550-tall-171734898800193
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 524K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.2K Jun 2 17:16 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 71K Jun 2 17:16 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.1K Jun 2 17:16 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 48K Jun 2 17:16 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.2K Jun 2 17:12 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 23K Jun 2 17:12 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K Jun 2 17:12 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Jun 2 17:12 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1 Jun 2 16:33 NewModel
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K Jun 2 17:16 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 137K Jun 2 17:16 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.9K Jun 2 17:16 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 58K Jun 2 17:16 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Jun 2 17:12 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Jun 2 17:12 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 2 16:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 Jun 2 16:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 2 16:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 89K Jun 2 16:33 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-12
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-13
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-14
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1717359681193
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=FireWire-PT-04
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-06-02 20:21:22] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-06-02 20:21:22] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-06-02 20:21:22] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 74 ms
[2024-06-02 20:21:22] [INFO ] Transformed 113 places.
[2024-06-02 20:21:22] [INFO ] Transformed 364 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:21:22] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-06-02 20:21:22] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 113 places and 364 transitions and 1349 arcs in 166 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 13 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 56 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 56 transitions.
FORMULA FireWire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 68 out of 113 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 113/113 places, 308/308 transitions.
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 6 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 6 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 113 transition count 302
Applied a total of 6 rules in 24 ms. Remains 113 /113 variables (removed 0) and now considering 302/308 (removed 6) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:21:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 276 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 276 rows 113 cols
[2024-06-02 20:21:22] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 16 ms
[2024-06-02 20:21:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 199 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:21:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 276 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:21:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:21:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:21:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 227 ms returned [61, 111]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 458 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 111/113 places, 302/308 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 111 /111 variables (removed 0) and now considering 302/302 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 502 ms. Remains : 111/113 places, 302/308 transitions.
Support contains 68 out of 111 places after structural reductions.
[2024-06-02 20:21:23] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2024-06-02 20:21:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 47 ms
[2024-06-02 20:21:23] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA FireWire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA FireWire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-06-02 20:21:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2024-06-02 20:21:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 302 transitions.
Support contains 62 out of 111 places (down from 68) after GAL structural reductions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 60 to 59
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2286 resets) in 1900 ms. (21 steps per ms) remains 19/59 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (58 resets) in 43 ms. (90 steps per ms) remains 18/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (58 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (63 resets) in 31 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (61 resets) in 40 ms. (97 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (50 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (75 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (54 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (59 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (54 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (58 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (57 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (52 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (52 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (103 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (46 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (50 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (72 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (73 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (52 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
[2024-06-02 20:21:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 276 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 276 rows 111 cols
[2024-06-02 20:21:24] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 8 ms
[2024-06-02 20:21:24] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 26/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 80/106 variables, 6/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 80/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
[2024-06-02 20:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 20:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 20:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 20:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 20:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 5/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 272/378 variables, 106/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 38/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 5/383 variables, 3/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 3/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
[2024-06-02 20:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 3/386 variables, 2/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/386 variables, 2/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/386 variables, 0/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 1/387 variables, 1/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 0/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/387 variables, 0/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 387/387 variables, and 274 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved in 1982 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 111/111 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 111/111 constraints, ReadFeed: 40/40 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 26/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 80/106 variables, 6/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 80/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 6/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
[2024-06-02 20:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 1/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 272/378 variables, 106/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 38/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 16/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 5/383 variables, 3/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 3/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 2/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
[2024-06-02 20:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 20:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 2/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 3/386 variables, 2/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/386 variables, 2/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/386 variables, 0/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 1/387 variables, 1/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 0/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 0/387 variables, 0/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 387/387 variables, and 295 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved in 2129 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 111/111 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 111/111 constraints, ReadFeed: 40/40 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 4168ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 1293 ms.
Support contains 26 out of 111 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 302/302 transitions.
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 111 transition count 298
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 110 transition count 298
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 110 transition count 297
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 109 transition count 297
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -4
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 107 transition count 301
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 107 transition count 297
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 107 transition count 295
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 2 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 107 transition count 296
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 105 transition count 294
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 105 transition count 292
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 105 transition count 292
Applied a total of 27 rules in 67 ms. Remains 105 /111 variables (removed 6) and now considering 292/302 (removed 10) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 67 ms. Remains : 105/111 places, 292/302 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2343 resets) in 721 ms. (55 steps per ms) remains 15/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (62 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (75 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (74 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (63 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (59 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (71 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (71 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (62 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (72 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (58 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (139 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (54 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (63 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (66 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (67 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 15/15 properties
[2024-06-02 20:21:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 265 transitions (discarded 27 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 265 rows 105 cols
[2024-06-02 20:21:29] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-02 20:21:30] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 41 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 79/102 variables, 6/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 79/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
[2024-06-02 20:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 20:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 60 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 20:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 20:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 4/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
[2024-06-02 20:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 264/366 variables, 102/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/366 variables, 40/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/366 variables, 0/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 4/370 variables, 3/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 3/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 1/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 0/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
[2024-06-02 20:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 69 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 20:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 64 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/370 variables, 2/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 0/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/370 variables, 0/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 370/370 variables, and 264 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved in 1393 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 105/105 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 105/105 constraints, ReadFeed: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 79/102 variables, 6/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 79/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 7/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
[2024-06-02 20:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 20:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 20:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 3/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
[2024-06-02 20:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 264/366 variables, 102/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/366 variables, 40/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/366 variables, 14/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/366 variables, 0/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 4/370 variables, 3/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 3/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 1/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 1/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
[2024-06-02 20:21:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 1/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/370 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 370/370 variables, and 284 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved in 2061 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 105/105 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 105/105 constraints, ReadFeed: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints]
After SMT, in 3488ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
Fused 15 Parikh solutions to 14 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 4050 ms.
Support contains 23 out of 105 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 105/105 places, 292/292 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 105 transition count 291
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 104 transition count 291
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 104 transition count 290
Applied a total of 3 rules in 23 ms. Remains 104 /105 variables (removed 1) and now considering 290/292 (removed 2) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 23 ms. Remains : 104/105 places, 290/292 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2419 resets) in 185 ms. (215 steps per ms) remains 13/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (604 resets) in 79 ms. (500 steps per ms) remains 13/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (654 resets) in 81 ms. (487 steps per ms) remains 13/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (622 resets) in 54 ms. (727 steps per ms) remains 13/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (666 resets) in 51 ms. (769 steps per ms) remains 13/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (643 resets) in 51 ms. (769 steps per ms) remains 13/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (623 resets) in 52 ms. (754 steps per ms) remains 13/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (600 resets) in 50 ms. (784 steps per ms) remains 13/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (619 resets) in 54 ms. (727 steps per ms) remains 13/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (656 resets) in 53 ms. (740 steps per ms) remains 13/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (1442 resets) in 52 ms. (754 steps per ms) remains 13/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (531 resets) in 36 ms. (1081 steps per ms) remains 13/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (502 resets) in 40 ms. (975 steps per ms) remains 12/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (633 resets) in 79 ms. (500 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
[2024-06-02 20:21:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 263 transitions (discarded 27 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 263 rows 104 cols
[2024-06-02 20:21:38] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 20:21:38] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 41 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 82/101 variables, 6/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 82/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
[2024-06-02 20:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 20:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 2/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 262/363 variables, 101/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/363 variables, 40/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
[2024-06-02 20:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 20:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/363 variables, 2/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/363 variables, 0/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 4/367 variables, 3/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 3/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 1/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 0/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/367 variables, 0/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 367/367 variables, and 259 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved in 774 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 104/104 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 104/104 constraints, ReadFeed: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 82/101 variables, 6/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 82/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 4/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
[2024-06-02 20:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 262/363 variables, 101/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/363 variables, 40/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/363 variables, 11/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
[2024-06-02 20:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/363 variables, 1/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/363 variables, 0/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 4/367 variables, 3/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 3/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 1/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 1/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
[2024-06-02 20:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 1/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 0/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/367 variables, 0/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 367/367 variables, and 274 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved in 1506 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 104/104 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 104/104 constraints, ReadFeed: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 2295ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 12 unsolved
Fused 12 Parikh solutions to 11 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 7 properties in 1811 ms.
Support contains 9 out of 104 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 290/290 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -2
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 11 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 103 transition count 292
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 103 transition count 290
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 103 transition count 289
Applied a total of 5 rules in 30 ms. Remains 103 /104 variables (removed 1) and now considering 289/290 (removed 1) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 30 ms. Remains : 103/104 places, 289/290 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2452 resets) in 103 ms. (384 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (651 resets) in 42 ms. (930 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (602 resets) in 58 ms. (678 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (630 resets) in 40 ms. (975 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (675 resets) in 50 ms. (784 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (1477 resets) in 71 ms. (555 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 31865 steps, run visited all 5 properties in 122 ms. (steps per millisecond=261 )
Probabilistic random walk after 31865 steps, saw 9030 distinct states, run finished after 125 ms. (steps per millisecond=254 ) properties seen :5
[2024-06-02 20:21:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2024-06-02 20:21:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2024-06-02 20:21:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 302 transitions.
Computed a total of 6 stabilizing places and 9 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 302/302 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 110 transition count 300
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 110 transition count 300
Applied a total of 2 rules in 5 ms. Remains 110 /111 variables (removed 1) and now considering 300/302 (removed 2) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:21:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 274 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 274 rows 110 cols
[2024-06-02 20:21:42] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-02 20:21:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:21:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 274 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:21:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:21:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:21:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 168 ms returned [36, 104]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 222 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 108/111 places, 300/302 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 108 /108 variables (removed 0) and now considering 300/300 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 229 ms. Remains : 108/111 places, 300/302 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:21:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-06-02 20:21:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-06-02 20:21:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 300 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:21:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-06-02 20:21:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-06-02 20:21:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2480718101124736761.gal : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:21:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11709048494839890331.ctl : 7 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2480718101124736761.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11709048494839890331.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.47708e+06,2.66996,83896,2,3904,5,236950,6,0,731,215509,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AG((!(E(!(((p0==0)||(p11==1))) U (p32==1))) + EG((((p34!=0)&&(p92!=1))||(p20!=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !((!(E(!(((p0==0)||(p11==1))) U (p32==1))) + EG((((p34!=0)&&(p92!=1))||(p20!=1))))))))] ...163
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t7, t8, t10, t15, t16, t17, t18, t20, t22, t27, t28, t29, t30, t32, t34, t39, t40, t4...589
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-06-02 20:22:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:12] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-06-02 20:22:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15014246671200196790.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15014246671200196790.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15014246671200196790.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15014246671200196790.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15014246671200196790.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-06-02 20:22:13] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-06-02 20:22:13] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-06-02 20:22:13] [INFO ] Removed a total of 454 redundant transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:22:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 53 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:13] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 90 labels/synchronizations in 12 ms.
[2024-06-02 20:22:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15449884288916531944.gal : 4 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9939476559690167477.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15449884288916531944.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9939476559690167477.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.47708e+06,2.18797,79768,1967,231,136525,1873,605,299568,86,15569,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AG((!(E(!(((i1.u8.p0==0)||(i0.i0.u3.p11==1))) U (i2.u11.p32==1))) + EG((((i2.u11.p34!=0)&&(i5.u31.p92!=1))||(i0.i1.u6.p20!=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !((!(E(!(((i1.u8.p0==0)||(i0.i0.u3.p11==1))) U (i2.u11.p32==1))) + EG((((i2.u11.p34!=0)&...208
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t42, t44, t45, t48, t49, t52, t57, t58, t63, t68, t73, t78, t92, t94, t95, t96, t97, t134...691
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
(forward)formula 0,1,6.28434,175072,1,0,264035,4643,3028,715597,401,27601,690895
FORMULA FireWire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 302/302 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 111 /111 variables (removed 0) and now considering 302/302 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:22:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 276 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 276 rows 111 cols
[2024-06-02 20:22:19] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:22:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 276 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:22:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:22:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:22:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 213 ms returned [36, 105]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 281 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 109/111 places, 302/302 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 109 /109 variables (removed 0) and now considering 302/302 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 294 ms. Remains : 109/111 places, 302/302 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:22:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 302 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:22:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16921053035945912219.gal : 2 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4302505030342091950.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16921053035945912219.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4302505030342091950.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.48693e+06,2.79221,86972,2,3824,5,246448,6,0,737,224285,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(((p46==0)||(p87==1))) + E(!((((p6==0)||(p95==1)) * (E(EG((p38==0)) U EG(((p34==0)||(p51==1)))) + (((p46==0)||(p0==1)) * EX(((p49==0)|...183
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(E(!((((p6==0)||(p95==1)) * (E(EG((p38==0)) U EG(((p34==0)||(p51==1)))) + (((p46==0)||(p0==1)) *...240
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t5, t9, t10, t12, t17, t18, t19, t20, t22, t24, t29, t30, t31, t32, t34, t36, t41...592
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-06-02 20:22:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:49] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-06-02 20:22:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3079060822047990837.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3079060822047990837.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3079060822047990837.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3079060822047990837.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3079060822047990837.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-06-02 20:22:49] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-06-02 20:22:49] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-06-02 20:22:50] [INFO ] Removed a total of 455 redundant transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:22:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:50] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 78 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2024-06-02 20:22:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12771446510672241271.gal : 3 ms
[2024-06-02 20:22:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6468487533909421417.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12771446510672241271.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6468487533909421417.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.48693e+06,6.49281,171428,1708,222,186924,2963,596,1.04083e+06,88,39654,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(((i7.i0.u15.p46==0)||(i5.u29.p87==1))) + E(!((((i3.u2.p6==0)||(i0.i0.u33.p95==1)) * (E(EG((i4.u12.p38==0)) U EG(((i2.u10.p34==0)||(i3...274
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(E(!((((i3.u2.p6==0)||(i0.i0.u33.p95==1)) * (E(EG((i4.u12.p38==0)) U EG(((i2.u10.p34==0)||(i3.u1...331
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t44, t46, t47, t50, t51, t54, t56, t59, t60, t65, t70, t75, t80, t94, t96, t97, t98, t99,...708
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
(forward)formula 0,0,22.3967,466364,1,0,607146,8033,3493,2.20185e+06,436,68090,1609976
FORMULA FireWire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 302/302 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 110 transition count 300
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 110 transition count 300
Applied a total of 2 rules in 6 ms. Remains 110 /111 variables (removed 1) and now considering 300/302 (removed 2) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:23:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 274 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 274 rows 110 cols
[2024-06-02 20:23:12] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-06-02 20:23:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:23:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 274 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:23:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:23:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:23:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 147 ms returned [36, 104]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 207 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 108/111 places, 300/302 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 108 /108 variables (removed 0) and now considering 300/300 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 215 ms. Remains : 108/111 places, 300/302 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:23:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-06-02 20:23:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-06-02 20:23:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 300 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:23:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2024-06-02 20:23:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-06-02 20:23:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7591604312694126545.gal : 3 ms
[2024-06-02 20:23:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6319356583546990810.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7591604312694126545.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6319356583546990810.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.47708e+06,2.8073,83816,2,3904,5,236950,6,0,731,215509,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E(!(E((EF(((p8==0)||(p53==1))) * (p51==0)) U ((AG(((p12==0)||(p74==1))) * ((p110==0)||(p14==1))) * (p107==1)))) U AG(!(E((p105==1) U AX...182
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(E((E(TRUE U ((p8==0)||(p53==1))) * (p51==0)) U ((!(E(TRUE U !(((p12==0)||(p74==1))))) * ((p110==0)...260
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t7, t8, t10, t15, t16, t17, t18, t20, t22, t27, t28, t29, t30, t32, t34, t39, t40, t4...589
(forward)formula 0,1,24.6438,660216,1,0,748,3.41724e+06,636,414,6237,3.0385e+06,837
FORMULA FireWire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 302/302 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 110 transition count 300
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 110 transition count 300
Applied a total of 2 rules in 7 ms. Remains 110 /111 variables (removed 1) and now considering 300/302 (removed 2) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:23:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 274 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:23:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:23:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:23:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 274 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:23:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:23:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:23:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 167 ms returned [36, 104]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 221 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 108/111 places, 300/302 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 108 /108 variables (removed 0) and now considering 300/300 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 229 ms. Remains : 108/111 places, 300/302 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:23:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-06-02 20:23:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-06-02 20:23:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 300 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:23:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-06-02 20:23:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-06-02 20:23:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1965748561150280682.gal : 1 ms
[2024-06-02 20:23:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15490928736960900676.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1965748561150280682.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15490928736960900676.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.47708e+06,2.69024,83720,2,3904,5,236950,6,0,731,215509,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AX((E((((p103==0)||(p34==1)) * EX((p101==0))) U AG((p81==0))) + ((p9==1) * EF(((p42==0)||(p32==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(((p9==1) * E(TRUE U ((p42==0)||(p32==1)))))) * !(E((((p103==0)||(p34==1)) * EX((p101=...199
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t7, t8, t10, t15, t16, t17, t18, t20, t22, t27, t28, t29, t30, t32, t34, t39, t40, t4...589
(forward)formula 0,0,15.5894,404904,1,0,678,2.01627e+06,626,364,6253,1.62018e+06,785
FORMULA FireWire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 302/302 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 110 transition count 300
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 110 transition count 300
Applied a total of 2 rules in 5 ms. Remains 110 /111 variables (removed 1) and now considering 300/302 (removed 2) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:23:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 274 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:23:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:23:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:23:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 274 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:23:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:23:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:23:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 154 ms returned [36, 104]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 208 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 108/111 places, 300/302 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 108 /108 variables (removed 0) and now considering 300/300 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 215 ms. Remains : 108/111 places, 300/302 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:23:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:23:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:23:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 300 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:23:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-06-02 20:23:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:23:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality440327663774296263.gal : 2 ms
[2024-06-02 20:23:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1003131706179102868.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality440327663774296263.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1003131706179102868.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.47708e+06,2.75654,83844,2,3904,5,236950,6,0,731,215509,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(!(A(EF(EX(((p60==0)||(p52==1)))) U E(EF(((p13==0)||(p25==1))) U ((p29==0)||(p81==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(E(E(TRUE U ((p13==0)||(p25==1))) U ((p29==0)||(p81==1))))) * !(E(TRUE U EX(((p60==0)|...338
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t7, t8, t10, t15, t16, t17, t18, t20, t22, t27, t28, t29, t30, t32, t34, t39, t40, t4...589
(forward)formula 0,0,6.07016,137364,1,0,548,588196,628,289,6268,533781,645
FORMULA FireWire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 302/302 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 110 transition count 300
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 109 transition count 300
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 109 transition count 299
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 108 transition count 299
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 107 transition count 297
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 107 transition count 297
Applied a total of 6 rules in 13 ms. Remains 107 /111 variables (removed 4) and now considering 297/302 (removed 5) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:24:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 271 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 271 rows 107 cols
[2024-06-02 20:24:00] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 20:24:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:24:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 271 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:24:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:24:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:24:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 135 ms returned [35, 103]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 192 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 105/111 places, 297/302 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 297/297 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 213 ms. Remains : 105/111 places, 297/302 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:24:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-06-02 20:24:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:24:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 297 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:24:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-06-02 20:24:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:24:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5884661105481017282.gal : 2 ms
[2024-06-02 20:24:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16463852357175212742.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5884661105481017282.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16463852357175212742.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
RANDOM walk for 30476 steps (1958 resets) in 95 ms. (317 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA FireWire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...329
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 302/302 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 111 /111 variables (removed 0) and now considering 302/302 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:24:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 276 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 276 rows 111 cols
[2024-06-02 20:24:00] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 20:24:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:24:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 276 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:24:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:24:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:24:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 136 ms returned [36, 105]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 193 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 109/111 places, 302/302 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 109 /109 variables (removed 0) and now considering 302/302 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 195 ms. Remains : 109/111 places, 302/302 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:24:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-06-02 20:24:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-06-02 20:24:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 302 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:24:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:24:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:24:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14849070452062049173.gal : 1 ms
[2024-06-02 20:24:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1476091465408697650.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14849070452062049173.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1476091465408697650.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.48693e+06,2.99444,87220,2,3824,5,246448,6,0,737,224285,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG((AG((((p82==0)||(p56==1)) + AF(((p105==0)||(p60==1))))) + EG(AF((p73==1))))) * E(A(A(!(((p85==1)&&((p96==0)||(p18==1)))) U !(EX((p110...317
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!(EG(!((p73==1))))))),TRUE) * !(((p82==0)||(p56==1)))),!(((p105==0)||(p60==...540
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t5, t9, t10, t12, t17, t18, t19, t20, t22, t24, t29, t30, t31, t32, t34, t36, t41...592
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,20.8542,568304,1,0,909,3.01244e+06,661,510,6473,2.71465e+06,1012
FORMULA FireWire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 302/302 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 111 transition count 301
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 110 transition count 301
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 110 transition count 300
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 109 transition count 300
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 108 transition count 298
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 108 transition count 298
Applied a total of 6 rules in 12 ms. Remains 108 /111 variables (removed 3) and now considering 298/302 (removed 4) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:24:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 272 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 272 rows 108 cols
[2024-06-02 20:24:21] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 20:24:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:24:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 272 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:24:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:24:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:24:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 145 ms returned [36, 104]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 200 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 106/111 places, 298/302 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 106 /106 variables (removed 0) and now considering 298/298 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 220 ms. Remains : 106/111 places, 298/302 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:24:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:24:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-06-02 20:24:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 298 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:24:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:24:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:24:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4618504255963201030.gal : 4 ms
[2024-06-02 20:24:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18070905424570343955.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4618504255963201030.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18070905424570343955.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.11209e+06,2.86742,86500,2,3905,5,246107,6,0,721,225845,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(AF(AG((p102==0)))) U AG((p62==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(!(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((p102==0))))))))) * !(E(TRUE U !((p62==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t7, t8, t10, t15, t16, t17, t18, t20, t22, t27, t28, t29, t30, t32, t34, t39, t40, t4...589
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-06-02 20:24:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:24:51] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-06-02 20:24:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15650555746484070003.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15650555746484070003.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15650555746484070003.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15650555746484070003.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15650555746484070003.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-06-02 20:24:51] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-06-02 20:24:51] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-06-02 20:24:51] [INFO ] Removed a total of 454 redundant transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:24:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-06-02 20:24:51] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 96 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2024-06-02 20:24:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality102051637423648973.gal : 2 ms
[2024-06-02 20:24:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9685408769862963182.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality102051637423648973.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9685408769862963182.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.11209e+06,5.90046,158968,1759,222,181990,1713,593,1.00459e+06,84,16953,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(AF(AG((i4.i0.u3.p102==0)))) U AG((i2.i1.u16.p62==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(!(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((i4.i0.u3.p102==0))))))))) * !(E(TRUE U !((i2.i1.u16.p62==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t42, t44, t45, t48, t49, t52, t57, t58, t63, t68, t73, t78, t92, t94, t95, t96, t97, t139...691
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 302/302 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 110 transition count 300
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 110 transition count 300
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 110 /111 variables (removed 1) and now considering 300/302 (removed 2) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:25:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 274 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 274 rows 110 cols
[2024-06-02 20:25:22] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-06-02 20:25:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:25:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 274 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:25:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:25:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:25:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 152 ms returned [36, 104]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 215 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 108/111 places, 300/302 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 108 /108 variables (removed 0) and now considering 300/300 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 218 ms. Remains : 108/111 places, 300/302 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:25:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:25:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:25:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 300 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:25:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:25:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:25:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6318653321201528169.gal : 2 ms
[2024-06-02 20:25:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8122367163737549367.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6318653321201528169.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8122367163737549367.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.47708e+06,2.77308,83820,2,3904,5,236950,6,0,731,215509,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(!(A(AG(AX(((p49==0)||(p81==1)))) U AX(AX(((p75==0)||(p99==1)))))) U !(EX((p23==1)))) * EF(EG((p8==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU((Init * !((E(!(!(EX((p23==1)))) U (!(!(!((E(!(!(EX(!(!(EX(!(((p75==0)||(p99==1))))))))) U (!(!(E(TRUE...372
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t7, t8, t10, t15, t16, t17, t18, t20, t22, t27, t28, t29, t30, t32, t34, t39, t40, t4...589
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 249/0/51
(forward)formula 0,0,14.6389,372056,1,0,629,1.60971e+06,642,344,6700,1.20415e+06,742
FORMULA FireWire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 302/302 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 111 transition count 301
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 110 transition count 301
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 110 transition count 300
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 109 transition count 300
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 108 transition count 298
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 108 transition count 298
Applied a total of 6 rules in 21 ms. Remains 108 /111 variables (removed 3) and now considering 298/302 (removed 4) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:25:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 272 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 272 rows 108 cols
[2024-06-02 20:25:37] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-02 20:25:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:25:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 272 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:25:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:25:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:25:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 140 ms returned [36, 104]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 199 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 106/111 places, 298/302 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 106 /106 variables (removed 0) and now considering 298/298 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 227 ms. Remains : 106/111 places, 298/302 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:25:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:25:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:25:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 298 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:25:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:25:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:25:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11030468708672503519.gal : 1 ms
[2024-06-02 20:25:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18125532345983086386.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11030468708672503519.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18125532345983086386.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.11209e+06,2.87658,86512,2,3905,5,246107,6,0,721,225845,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((EG(EF((p60==1))) + (p65==0)) + (p101==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((p101==1))) * !((p65==0))) * !(EG(E(TRUE U (p60==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t7, t8, t10, t15, t16, t17, t18, t20, t22, t27, t28, t29, t30, t32, t34, t39, t40, t4...589
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,22.6645,600056,1,0,715,3.17569e+06,626,422,6369,2.58353e+06,826
FORMULA FireWire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 302/302 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 110 transition count 300
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 110 transition count 300
Applied a total of 2 rules in 5 ms. Remains 110 /111 variables (removed 1) and now considering 300/302 (removed 2) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:26:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 274 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 274 rows 110 cols
[2024-06-02 20:26:00] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-06-02 20:26:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:26:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 274 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:26:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:26:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:26:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 154 ms returned [36, 104]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 217 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 108/111 places, 300/302 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 108 /108 variables (removed 0) and now considering 300/300 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 223 ms. Remains : 108/111 places, 300/302 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:26:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:26:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:26:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 300 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:26:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:26:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:26:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6196984667322783925.gal : 2 ms
[2024-06-02 20:26:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1641691083182988973.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6196984667322783925.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1641691083182988973.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.47708e+06,2.7891,83880,2,3904,5,236950,6,0,731,215509,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((EF((p7==1)) * EX((p107==0))) * (EG((p103==1)) + E((p33==1) U ((p80==0)||(p1==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (E(TRUE U (p7==1)) * EX((p107==0)))),(p103==1))] != FALSE + [(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ...235
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t7, t8, t10, t15, t16, t17, t18, t20, t22, t27, t28, t29, t30, t32, t34, t39, t40, t4...589
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 296/0/4
(forward)formula 0,1,8.58022,205144,1,0,550,860693,629,290,6490,691976,647
FORMULA FireWire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 302/302 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 111 /111 variables (removed 0) and now considering 302/302 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:26:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 276 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 276 rows 111 cols
[2024-06-02 20:26:09] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-02 20:26:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:26:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 276 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:26:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:26:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:26:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 196 ms returned [36, 105]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 260 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 109/111 places, 302/302 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 109 /109 variables (removed 0) and now considering 302/302 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 262 ms. Remains : 109/111 places, 302/302 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:26:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:26:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:26:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 302 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:26:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:26:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:26:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15451544180075078407.gal : 1 ms
[2024-06-02 20:26:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17830206065837654436.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15451544180075078407.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17830206065837654436.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.48693e+06,2.84638,87152,2,3824,5,246448,6,0,737,224285,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EF(((A(AF((p25==1)) U EX(((p53==0)||(p86==1)))) + (p85==0)) + (p3==1))) U ((EG(!((EX((p80==0)) * (((p105==1)||(p81==0))||(p75==1))))) *...342
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(Init,E(TRUE U ((!((E(!(EX(((p53==0)||(p86==1)))) U (!(!(EG(!((p25==1))))) * !(EX(((p53==0)||(p86==1)))...1481
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t5, t9, t10, t12, t17, t18, t19, t20, t22, t24, t29, t30, t31, t32, t34, t36, t41...592
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-06-02 20:26:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:26:39] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-06-02 20:26:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1693925191955681958.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1693925191955681958.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1693925191955681958.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1693925191955681958.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1693925191955681958.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-06-02 20:26:39] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-06-02 20:26:39] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-06-02 20:26:39] [INFO ] Removed a total of 455 redundant transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:26:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-06-02 20:26:39] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 85 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2024-06-02 20:26:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16750002501963910916.gal : 2 ms
[2024-06-02 20:26:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12326220799137160223.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16750002501963910916.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12326220799137160223.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.48693e+06,4.495,123900,1772,267,181698,2602,595,451381,98,23020,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EF(((A(AF((i2.u9.p25==1)) U EX(((i4.u20.p53==0)||(i5.u29.p86==1)))) + (i5.u29.p85==0)) + (i7.i2.u1.p3==1))) U ((EG(!((EX((i5.u27.p80==0...503
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(Init,E(TRUE U ((!((E(!(EX(((i4.u20.p53==0)||(i5.u29.p86==1)))) U (!(!(EG(!((i2.u9.p25==1))))) * !(EX((...2044
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t44, t46, t47, t50, t51, t54, t56, t59, t60, t65, t70, t75, t80, t94, t96, t97, t98, t99,...721
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
(forward)formula 0,1,17.3365,437680,1,0,710814,7413,3768,1.37474e+06,479,51631,1875234
FORMULA FireWire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 302/302 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 110 transition count 300
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 110 transition count 300
Applied a total of 2 rules in 1 ms. Remains 110 /111 variables (removed 1) and now considering 300/302 (removed 2) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:26:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 274 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 274 rows 110 cols
[2024-06-02 20:26:56] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 20:26:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:26:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 274 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:26:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:26:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:26:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 153 ms returned [36, 104]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 212 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 108/111 places, 300/302 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 108 /108 variables (removed 0) and now considering 300/300 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 214 ms. Remains : 108/111 places, 300/302 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:26:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:26:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:26:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 300 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:26:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:26:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:26:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8033388049398950938.gal : 1 ms
[2024-06-02 20:26:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15478417924288363701.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8033388049398950938.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15478417924288363701.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.47708e+06,2.7667,83928,2,3904,5,236950,6,0,731,215509,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AG(EF((p88==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (p88==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t7, t8, t10, t15, t16, t17, t18, t20, t22, t27, t28, t29, t30, t32, t34, t39, t40, t4...589
(forward)formula 0,0,11.766,306012,1,0,595,1.1925e+06,619,311,6392,893213,703
FORMULA FireWire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2024-06-02 20:27:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-06-02 20:27:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:27:09] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-06-02 20:27:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12305561764989790106.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12305561764989790106.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12305561764989790106.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12305561764989790106.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12305561764989790106.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-06-02 20:27:09] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-06-02 20:27:09] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-06-02 20:27:09] [INFO ] Removed a total of 454 redundant transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:27:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-06-02 20:27:09] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 89 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2024-06-02 20:27:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13605531468540035248.gal : 2 ms
[2024-06-02 20:27:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5850803684757566958.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13605531468540035248.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5850803684757566958.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.48693e+06,7.83676,196972,2061,213,209440,2622,581,1.32463e+06,88,31238,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(AF(AG((i3.i0.u3.p102==0)))) U AG((i3.i1.u16.p62==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(!(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((i3.i0.u3.p102==0))))))))) * !(E(TRUE U !((i3.i1.u16.p62==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t44, t46, t47, t50, t51, t54, t56, t59, t60, t65, t70, t75, t80, t94, t96, t97, t98, t99,...693
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
(forward)formula 0,1,42.4492,889080,1,0,1.17341e+06,7313,3049,4.92357e+06,407,49917,2530228
FORMULA FireWire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2024-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Total runtime 389474 ms.
BK_STOP 1717360071795
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="FireWire-PT-04"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is FireWire-PT-04, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r550-tall-171734898800193"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/FireWire-PT-04.tgz
mv FireWire-PT-04 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;