Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r550-tall-171734898700178.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is FireWire-PT-02, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r550-tall-171734898700178
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 516K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.9K Jun 2 17:16 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 77K Jun 2 17:16 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.3K Jun 2 17:16 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 48K Jun 2 17:16 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.2K Jun 2 17:12 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K Jun 2 17:12 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Jun 2 17:12 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K Jun 2 17:12 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1 Jun 2 16:33 NewModel
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.6K Jun 2 17:16 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 104K Jun 2 17:16 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.1K Jun 2 17:16 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 80K Jun 2 17:16 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Jun 2 17:12 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Jun 2 17:12 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 2 16:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 Jun 2 16:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 Jun 2 16:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 86K Jun 2 16:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-12
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-13
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-14
FORMULA_NAME FireWire-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1717358946188

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=FireWire-PT-02
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-06-02 20:09:07] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-06-02 20:09:07] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-06-02 20:09:07] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 77 ms
[2024-06-02 20:09:07] [INFO ] Transformed 108 places.
[2024-06-02 20:09:07] [INFO ] Transformed 355 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:09:07] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-06-02 20:09:07] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 108 places and 355 transitions and 1311 arcs in 172 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 11 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 54 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 54 transitions.
Support contains 78 out of 108 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 108/108 places, 301/301 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 107 transition count 299
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 107 transition count 299
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 107 transition count 298
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 6 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 6 transitions
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 107 transition count 292
Applied a total of 9 rules in 29 ms. Remains 107 /108 variables (removed 1) and now considering 292/301 (removed 9) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:09:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 266 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 266 rows 107 cols
[2024-06-02 20:09:07] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 18 ms
[2024-06-02 20:09:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 213 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:09:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 266 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:09:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:09:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:09:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 209 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 471 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 291 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:09:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 266 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:09:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:09:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/107 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
[2024-06-02 20:09:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 20:09:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 89 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 20:09:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 20:09:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 20:09:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 20:09:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 20:09:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 7/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
[2024-06-02 20:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 72 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 265/372 variables, 107/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/372 variables, 39/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/372 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/373 variables, 1/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/373 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/373 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 373/373 variables, and 163 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved in 12605 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 107/107 constraints, ReadFeed: 40/40 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 291/291 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/107 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 8/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 265/372 variables, 107/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/372 variables, 39/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/372 variables, 291/453 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/372 variables, 0/453 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/373 variables, 1/454 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/373 variables, 0/454 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/373 variables, 0/454 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 373/373 variables, and 454 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved in 21779 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 107/107 constraints, ReadFeed: 40/40 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 291/291 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints]
After SMT, in 34654ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 291 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 34695ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 107/108 places, 292/301 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 35216 ms. Remains : 107/108 places, 292/301 transitions.
Support contains 78 out of 107 places after structural reductions.
[2024-06-02 20:09:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 46 ms
[2024-06-02 20:09:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2024-06-02 20:09:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 292 transitions.
Support contains 77 out of 107 places (down from 78) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2192 resets) in 2026 ms. (19 steps per ms) remains 35/77 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (13 resets) in 39 ms. (100 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (21 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (64 resets) in 43 ms. (91 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (10 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 34/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (51 resets) in 44 ms. (88 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (58 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (11 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (60 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (64 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (63 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (47 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 33/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 33/33 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (56 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 33/33 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 32/33 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (13 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (103 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (15 resets) in 31 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (103 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (61 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (67 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (53 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (49 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (17 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (108 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (49 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (22 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (59 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (99 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (60 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (38 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
[2024-06-02 20:09:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 266 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:09:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:09:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp2 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp71 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 63/104 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 30 unsolved
[2024-06-02 20:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 20:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 2/106 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 265/371 variables, 106/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/371 variables, 39/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/371 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/372 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/372 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/373 variables, 1/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/373 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/373 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 373/373 variables, and 157 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 30 unsolved in 1243 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 107/107 constraints, ReadFeed: 40/40 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 30 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp9 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp38 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 67/104 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 28 unsolved
[2024-06-02 20:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 2/106 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 265/371 variables, 106/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/371 variables, 39/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/371 variables, 27/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 28 unsolved
[2024-06-02 20:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/371 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/371 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 1/372 variables, 1/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/372 variables, 1/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/372 variables, 0/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 1/373 variables, 1/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/373 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/373 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 373/373 variables, and 187 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 28 unsolved in 2930 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 107/107 constraints, ReadFeed: 40/40 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/32 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 4217ms problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 28 unsolved
Fused 28 Parikh solutions to 27 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 4 properties in 4234 ms.
Support contains 28 out of 107 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 107/107 places, 292/292 transitions.
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 107 transition count 288
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 106 transition count 288
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 106 transition count 287
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 6 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 105 transition count 287
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 101 transition count 277
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 101 transition count 277
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 101 transition count 275
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 100 transition count 273
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 100 transition count 273
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -6
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 97 transition count 279
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 97 transition count 273
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 97 transition count 270
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 97 transition count 272
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 96 transition count 270
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 96 transition count 268
Applied a total of 40 rules in 90 ms. Remains 96 /107 variables (removed 11) and now considering 268/292 (removed 24) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 90 ms. Remains : 96/107 places, 268/292 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2421 resets) in 605 ms. (66 steps per ms) remains 22/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (62 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (57 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (13 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (67 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (77 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (55 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (133 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (15 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (141 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (76 resets) in 25 ms. (154 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (70 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (65 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (12 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (154 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (66 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (129 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (55 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (69 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
Probabilistic random walk after 1000001 steps, saw 214169 distinct states, run finished after 2566 ms. (steps per millisecond=389 ) properties seen :20
[2024-06-02 20:09:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 239 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 239 rows 96 cols
[2024-06-02 20:09:55] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-02 20:09:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 39 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 66/70 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 25/95 variables, 4/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
[2024-06-02 20:09:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 239/334 variables, 95/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 39/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/335 variables, 1/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/335 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 335/335 variables, and 144 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 175 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 96/96 constraints, ReadFeed: 39/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 66/70 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 25/95 variables, 4/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 239/334 variables, 95/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 39/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 2/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/334 variables, 0/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/335 variables, 1/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/335 variables, 0/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 335/335 variables, and 146 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 186 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 96/96 constraints, ReadFeed: 39/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 372ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Fused 2 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 106 ms.
Support contains 4 out of 96 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 96/96 places, 268/268 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 94 transition count 263
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 94 transition count 263
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 93 transition count 261
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 93 transition count 261
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 92 transition count 260
Applied a total of 7 rules in 24 ms. Remains 92 /96 variables (removed 4) and now considering 260/268 (removed 8) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 24 ms. Remains : 92/96 places, 260/268 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2523 resets) in 106 ms. (373 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (629 resets) in 35 ms. (1111 steps per ms) remains 1/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (22 resets) in 18 ms. (2105 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2024-06-02 20:09:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 231 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 231 rows 92 cols
[2024-06-02 20:09:56] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 20:09:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 37 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 63/67 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 206/273 variables, 67/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 26/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 47/320 variables, 23/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 3/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 11/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 3/323 variables, 2/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 1/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/323 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 323/323 variables, and 137 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 102 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 92/92 constraints, ReadFeed: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 63/67 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 206/273 variables, 67/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 26/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 47/320 variables, 23/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 3/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 11/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 1/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 0/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 3/323 variables, 2/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 1/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 0/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/323 variables, 0/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 323/323 variables, and 138 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 138 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 92/92 constraints, ReadFeed: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 249ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 18 ms.
Support contains 4 out of 92 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 92/92 places, 260/260 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 92 /92 variables (removed 0) and now considering 260/260 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 7 ms. Remains : 92/92 places, 260/260 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2599 resets) in 87 ms. (454 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (31 resets) in 23 ms. (1666 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 2076879 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=692 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 2076879 steps, saw 422437 distinct states, run finished after 3004 ms. (steps per millisecond=691 ) properties seen :0
[2024-06-02 20:09:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 231 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:09:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:09:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 37 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 63/67 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 206/273 variables, 67/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 26/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 47/320 variables, 23/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 3/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 11/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 3/323 variables, 2/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 1/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/323 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 323/323 variables, and 137 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 112 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 92/92 constraints, ReadFeed: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 63/67 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 206/273 variables, 67/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 26/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 47/320 variables, 23/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 3/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 11/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 1/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/320 variables, 0/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 3/323 variables, 2/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 1/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/323 variables, 0/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/323 variables, 0/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 323/323 variables, and 138 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 149 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 92/92 constraints, ReadFeed: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 269ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 22 ms.
Support contains 4 out of 92 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 92/92 places, 260/260 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 92 /92 variables (removed 0) and now considering 260/260 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 7 ms. Remains : 92/92 places, 260/260 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 92/92 places, 260/260 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 92 /92 variables (removed 0) and now considering 260/260 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:09:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 231 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:09:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:09:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:09:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 231 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:09:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:09:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 37 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:09:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 129 ms returned [56]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 191 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 91/92 places, 260/260 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 91 /91 variables (removed 0) and now considering 260/260 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 2 iterations and 203 ms. Remains : 91/92 places, 260/260 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2576 resets) in 80 ms. (493 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (31 resets) in 17 ms. (2222 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 2286827 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=762 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 2286827 steps, saw 457892 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=762 ) properties seen :0
[2024-06-02 20:10:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 231 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 231 rows 91 cols
[2024-06-02 20:10:02] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:10:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 37 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 62/66 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 206/272 variables, 66/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 26/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 47/319 variables, 23/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 3/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 11/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 3/322 variables, 2/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 1/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 0/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/322 variables, 0/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 322/322 variables, and 135 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 121 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 91/91 constraints, ReadFeed: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 62/66 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 206/272 variables, 66/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 26/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 47/319 variables, 23/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 3/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 11/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 1/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 3/322 variables, 2/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 1/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 0/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/322 variables, 0/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 322/322 variables, and 136 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 134 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 91/91 constraints, ReadFeed: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 269ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 21 ms.
Support contains 4 out of 91 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 91/91 places, 260/260 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 91 /91 variables (removed 0) and now considering 260/260 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 5 ms. Remains : 91/91 places, 260/260 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 91/91 places, 260/260 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 91 /91 variables (removed 0) and now considering 260/260 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:10:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 231 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:10:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:10:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:10:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 231 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:10:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:10:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 37 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:10:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 113 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 183 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-02 20:10:03] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 13 ms returned []
Running 258 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:10:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 231 transitions (discarded 29 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:10:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:10:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 37 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
[2024-06-02 20:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 64 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 20:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 20:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 20:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 20:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 20:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 20:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 20:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 8/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
[2024-06-02 20:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 231/321 variables, 90/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 37/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/322 variables, 1/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
[2024-06-02 20:10:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 1/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 0/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/322 variables, 0/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 322/322 variables, and 145 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved in 10138 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 91/91 constraints, ReadFeed: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 258/258 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 10/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 231/321 variables, 90/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 37/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 258/402 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 0/402 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/322 variables, 1/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 0/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/322 variables, 0/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 322/322 variables, and 403 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved in 12906 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 91/91 constraints, ReadFeed: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 258/258 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints]
After SMT, in 23196ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 23199ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 23405 ms. Remains : 91/91 places, 260/260 transitions.
Attempting over-approximation, by ignoring read arcs.
Graph (trivial) has 88 edges and 91 vertex of which 20 / 91 are part of one of the 3 SCC in 6 ms
Free SCC test removed 17 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 51 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 39 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 90 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 73 transition count 169
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 12 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 12 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 73 transition count 157
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 73 transition count 156
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 72 transition count 156
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 72 transition count 158
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 71 transition count 158
Applied a total of 19 rules in 28 ms. Remains 71 /91 variables (removed 20) and now considering 158/260 (removed 102) transitions.
Running SMT prover for 1 properties.
[2024-06-02 20:10:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 157 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 157 rows 71 cols
[2024-06-02 20:10:26] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-06-02 20:10:26] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 7 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2024-06-02 20:10:26] [INFO ] After 75ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:1
[2024-06-02 20:10:26] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 7 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2024-06-02 20:10:26] [INFO ] After 40ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
TRAPS : Iteration 0
[2024-06-02 20:10:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-02 20:10:26] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 40 ms
TRAPS : Iteration 1
[2024-06-02 20:10:26] [INFO ] After 99ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
[2024-06-02 20:10:26] [INFO ] After 133ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
Over-approximation ignoring read arcs solved 0 properties in 255 ms.
Successfully simplified 4 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
FORMULA FireWire-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-06-02 20:10:26] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2024-06-02 20:10:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
FORMULA FireWire-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-06-02 20:10:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2024-06-02 20:10:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 292 transitions.
Support contains 62 out of 107 places (down from 73) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 6 stabilizing places and 11 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 107/107 places, 292/292 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 102 transition count 279
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 102 transition count 279
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 102 transition count 277
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 99 transition count 271
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 99 transition count 271
Applied a total of 18 rules in 5 ms. Remains 99 /107 variables (removed 8) and now considering 271/292 (removed 21) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:10:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 245 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 245 rows 99 cols
[2024-06-02 20:10:26] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 20:10:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:10:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 245 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:10:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:10:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 37 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:10:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 123 ms returned [61]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 181 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/107 places, 271/292 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 271/271 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 188 ms. Remains : 98/107 places, 271/292 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:10:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-06-02 20:10:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2024-06-02 20:10:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 271 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:10:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-06-02 20:10:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-06-02 20:10:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9053288257722731270.gal : 5 ms
[2024-06-02 20:10:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12676786712851264576.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9053288257722731270.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12676786712851264576.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.34646e+06,1.35214,45016,2,2752,5,126707,6,0,662,117682,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(FALSE)
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(FALSE))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,1.36294,45268,1,0,6,126707,7,1,976,117682,1
FORMULA FireWire-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 107/107 places, 292/292 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 102 transition count 279
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 102 transition count 279
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 102 transition count 277
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 99 transition count 271
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 99 transition count 271
Applied a total of 18 rules in 6 ms. Remains 99 /107 variables (removed 8) and now considering 271/292 (removed 21) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:10:28] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 245 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:10:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:10:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:10:28] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 245 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:10:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:10:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 37 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:10:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 124 ms returned [61]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 176 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/107 places, 271/292 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 271/271 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 184 ms. Remains : 98/107 places, 271/292 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:10:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-06-02 20:10:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-06-02 20:10:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 271 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:10:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-06-02 20:10:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-06-02 20:10:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6995269120634497926.gal : 3 ms
[2024-06-02 20:10:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7559869128493100142.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6995269120634497926.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7559869128493100142.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.34646e+06,1.36037,45032,2,2752,5,126707,6,0,662,117682,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(((((EX(((p10==0)||(p53==0))) * ((p64==0)||(p90==0))) * ((p6==0)||(p51==0))) + ((p6==1)&&(p50==1))) + (p2==0))) + (AX(((AG((p34==0)) +...278
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((EY((Init * !(!(E(TRUE U !(((((EX(((p10==0)||(p53==0))) * ((p64==0)||(p90==0))) * ((p6==0)||(p51==0))) + ...514
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t5, t7, t11, t12, t14, t15, t16, t18, t20, t24, t25, t27, t28, t29, t31, t33, t37...584
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,19.6663,573464,1,0,752,3.25892e+06,578,421,5745,2.87558e+06,829
FORMULA FireWire-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 107/107 places, 292/292 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 103 transition count 282
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 103 transition count 282
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 103 transition count 280
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 101 transition count 276
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 101 transition count 276
Applied a total of 14 rules in 10 ms. Remains 101 /107 variables (removed 6) and now considering 276/292 (removed 16) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:10:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 250 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 250 rows 101 cols
[2024-06-02 20:10:48] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 20:10:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 161 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:10:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 250 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:10:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:10:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:10:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 134 ms returned [63]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 309 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 100/107 places, 276/292 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 100 /100 variables (removed 0) and now considering 276/276 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 320 ms. Remains : 100/107 places, 276/292 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:10:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-06-02 20:10:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-06-02 20:10:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 276 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:10:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-06-02 20:10:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-06-02 20:10:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1863720902364084019.gal : 2 ms
[2024-06-02 20:10:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11671801750717132185.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1863720902364084019.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11671801750717132185.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.421e+06,1.36949,45068,2,2835,5,124276,6,0,675,120231,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(E(AG(!(((p6==1)&&(p107==1)))) U A(EX((p62==1)) U ((E(((p8==1)&&(p79==1)) U (p54==1)) + ((p8==1)&&(p79==1))) + ((p3==1)&&(p56==1))))))...170
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,E(!(E(TRUE U !(!(((p6==1)&&(p107==1)))))) U !((E(!(((E(((p8==1)&&(p79==1)) U (p54==1)) + ((p8==1)&&(...434
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t5, t7, t11, t12, t14, t15, t16, t18, t20, t24, t25, t27, t28, t29, t31, t33, t37...596
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,28.0371,788992,1,0,914,4.68048e+06,598,535,5771,4.13888e+06,978
FORMULA FireWire-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 107/107 places, 292/292 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 106 transition count 290
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 105 transition count 290
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 105 transition count 289
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 104 transition count 289
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 99 transition count 276
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 99 transition count 276
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 99 transition count 274
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 96 transition count 268
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 96 transition count 268
Applied a total of 22 rules in 22 ms. Remains 96 /107 variables (removed 11) and now considering 268/292 (removed 24) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:11:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 242 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 242 rows 96 cols
[2024-06-02 20:11:17] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 20:11:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:11:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 242 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:11:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:11:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 35 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:11:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 180 ms returned [58]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 246 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 95/107 places, 268/292 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 95 /95 variables (removed 0) and now considering 268/268 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 278 ms. Remains : 95/107 places, 268/292 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:11:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-06-02 20:11:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-06-02 20:11:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 268 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:11:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 44 ms
[2024-06-02 20:11:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2659 resets) in 216 ms. (184 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2024-06-02 20:11:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4477990928587661503.gal : 39 ms
[2024-06-02 20:11:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8598594404327396675.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4477990928587661503.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8598594404327396675.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (694 resets) in 131 ms. (303 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties

its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...328
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8598594404327396675.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 5
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :5 after 9
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :9 after 12
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :12 after 18
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :18 after 24
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :24 after 1024
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :1024 after 1340
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :1340 after 4745
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :4745 after 7346
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 2048
SDD size :7346 after 17116
Reachability property FireWire-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-03 is true.
FORMULA FireWire-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL COLLATERAL_PROCESSING
Found states matching all0 target predicate
Will report total states built up to this point. Computation was interrupted after 2049 fixpoint passes
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
petri\_inst\_inst,398248,0.820706,26024,2,1861,17,64536,6,0,647,65374,0
Total reachable state count : 398248

Verifying 1 reachability properties.
Reachability property FireWire-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-03 is true.

Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
FireWire-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-03,9338,0.821538,26284,2,526,17,64536,7,0,653,65374,0
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 2301143 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=766 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 2301143 steps, saw 426427 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=766 ) properties seen :0
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 107/107 places, 292/292 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 103 transition count 282
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 103 transition count 282
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 103 transition count 280
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 101 transition count 276
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 101 transition count 276
Applied a total of 14 rules in 3 ms. Remains 101 /107 variables (removed 6) and now considering 276/292 (removed 16) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:11:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 250 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 250 rows 101 cols
[2024-06-02 20:11:20] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-06-02 20:11:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:11:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 250 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:11:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:11:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:11:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 121 ms returned [61]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 202 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 100/107 places, 276/292 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 100 /100 variables (removed 0) and now considering 276/276 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 206 ms. Remains : 100/107 places, 276/292 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-06-02 20:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-06-02 20:11:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 276 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-06-02 20:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-06-02 20:11:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6753893822169172356.gal : 2 ms
[2024-06-02 20:11:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7247983384392507921.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6753893822169172356.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7247983384392507921.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.36523e+06,1.00434,37980,2,2625,5,105214,6,0,675,93514,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AG(((AF(E(((p11==1)&&(p106==1)) U ((p6==1)&&(p83==1)))) + A((EX(((p63==1)&&(p78==1))) * (((p4==1)&&(p97==1))||((p64==1)&&(p91==1)))) U ...277
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU(Init,!(E(TRUE U !(((!(EG(!(E(((p11==1)&&(p106==1)) U ((p6==1)&&(p83==1)))))) + !((E(!(((p6==1)&&(p80...427
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t5, t7, t11, t12, t14, t15, t16, t18, t20, t24, t25, t27, t28, t29, t31, t33, t37...596
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-06-02 20:11:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-06-02 20:11:51] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-06-02 20:11:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph483844608442613234.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph483844608442613234.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph483844608442613234.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph483844608442613234.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph483844608442613234.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-06-02 20:11:51] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-06-02 20:11:51] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-06-02 20:11:51] [INFO ] Removed a total of 414 redundant transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:11:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 51 ms
[2024-06-02 20:11:51] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 18 ms.
[2024-06-02 20:11:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11489697712022026833.gal : 3 ms
[2024-06-02 20:11:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2939118646036750814.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11489697712022026833.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2939118646036750814.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.36523e+06,4.26664,138516,1658,196,199135,3132,595,719691,85,21380,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AG(((AF(E(((i1.i1.u3.p11==1)&&(i1.i1.u3.p106==1)) U ((i6.i0.u27.p6==1)&&(i6.i1.u35.p83==1)))) + A((EX(((i5.u20.p63==1)&&(i6.i1.u25.p78=...446
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU(Init,!(E(TRUE U !(((!(EG(!(E(((i1.i1.u3.p11==1)&&(i1.i1.u3.p106==1)) U ((i6.i0.u27.p6==1)&&(i6.i1.u3...636
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t42, t44, t48, t49, t51, t59, t64, t101, t102, t103, t105, t107, t123, t128, t133, t138, ...791
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
(forward)formula 0,1,23.4716,649608,1,0,907061,10520,3157,3.86725e+06,385,74296,1674486
FORMULA FireWire-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 107/107 places, 292/292 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 102 transition count 279
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 102 transition count 279
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 102 transition count 277
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 100 transition count 273
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 100 transition count 273
Applied a total of 16 rules in 2 ms. Remains 100 /107 variables (removed 7) and now considering 273/292 (removed 19) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:12:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 247 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 247 rows 100 cols
[2024-06-02 20:12:15] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 20:12:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:12:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 247 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:12:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:12:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 37 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:12:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 117 ms returned [61]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 175 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 99/107 places, 273/292 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 99 /99 variables (removed 0) and now considering 273/273 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 177 ms. Remains : 99/107 places, 273/292 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:12:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-06-02 20:12:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-06-02 20:12:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 273 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:12:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:12:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-06-02 20:12:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5238709757307049805.gal : 2 ms
[2024-06-02 20:12:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12821811381947522021.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5238709757307049805.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12821811381947522021.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.35546e+06,1.0879,40100,2,2678,5,113688,6,0,668,105028,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((EF((A(((p3==1)&&(p19==1)) U (p25==1)) * EX((p8==1)))) * (p8==1)) * ((p52==1) * (AF((EX(((p8==1)&&(p26==1))) * (((p4==1)&&(p71==1))||...204
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (E(TRUE U (!((E(!((p25==1)) U (!(((p3==1)&&(p19==1))) * !((p25==1)))) + EG(!((p25==1)))))...478
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t5, t7, t11, t12, t14, t15, t16, t18, t20, t24, t25, t27, t28, t29, t31, t33, t37...585
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-06-02 20:12:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-06-02 20:12:45] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-06-02 20:12:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3043276183814718219.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3043276183814718219.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3043276183814718219.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3043276183814718219.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3043276183814718219.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-06-02 20:12:45] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-06-02 20:12:45] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-06-02 20:12:45] [INFO ] Removed a total of 424 redundant transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:12:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2024-06-02 20:12:45] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 61 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2024-06-02 20:12:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10209629182476604209.gal : 2 ms
[2024-06-02 20:12:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10901933825689956655.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10209629182476604209.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10901933825689956655.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.35546e+06,8.69286,220876,1733,60,343761,537,479,843599,67,2151,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((EF((A(((i0.u0.p3==1)&&(i0.u7.p19==1)) U (i3.u9.p25==1)) * EX((i5.u2.p8==1)))) * (i5.u2.p8==1)) * ((i4.u18.p52==1) * (AF((EX(((i5.u2....293
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (E(TRUE U (!((E(!((i3.u9.p25==1)) U (!(((i0.u0.p3==1)&&(i0.u7.p19==1))) * !((i3.u9.p25==1...628
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t42, t44, t45, t48, t49, t58, t59, t60, t62, t64, t102, t104, t143, t145, t146, t147, t15...738
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
(forward)formula 0,1,22.6773,541328,1,0,841001,1173,2655,2.52096e+06,262,3614,1486467
FORMULA FireWire-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 107/107 places, 292/292 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 107 transition count 291
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 106 transition count 291
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 106 transition count 290
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 105 transition count 290
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 100 transition count 277
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 100 transition count 277
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 100 transition count 275
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 97 transition count 269
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 97 transition count 269
Applied a total of 22 rules in 18 ms. Remains 97 /107 variables (removed 10) and now considering 269/292 (removed 23) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:13:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 243 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 243 rows 97 cols
[2024-06-02 20:13:08] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-06-02 20:13:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:13:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 243 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:13:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:13:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 37 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:13:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 138 ms returned [59]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 195 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 96/107 places, 269/292 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 96 /96 variables (removed 0) and now considering 269/269 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 219 ms. Remains : 96/107 places, 269/292 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:13:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-06-02 20:13:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:13:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 269 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:13:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:13:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:13:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12852550083253191311.gal : 1 ms
[2024-06-02 20:13:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10141120071689428697.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12852550083253191311.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10141120071689428697.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.01593e+06,1.08345,34788,2,2457,5,88296,6,0,652,92323,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((p9==1)&&(p74==1)) U (A(AG(((p6==1)&&(p79==1))) U (p8==1)) + E(((!((p7==1)&&(p60==1)))&&(!(((!((p8==1)&&(p83==1)))&&(p54==1))&&((p8==1...195
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,((p9==1)&&(p74==1))) * !(EG(!((p8==1))))) * !(E(!((p8==1)) U (!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p6==1)&&(p79==1))))...346
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t5, t7, t11, t12, t14, t15, t16, t18, t20, t24, t25, t27, t28, t29, t31, t33, t37...584
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 231/36/38
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 159/50/110
(forward)formula 0,1,19.499,568436,1,0,673,2.68981e+06,580,347,5841,2.81233e+06,768
FORMULA FireWire-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 107/107 places, 292/292 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 106 transition count 290
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 105 transition count 290
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 105 transition count 289
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 104 transition count 289
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 99 transition count 276
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 99 transition count 276
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 99 transition count 274
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 96 transition count 268
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 96 transition count 268
Applied a total of 22 rules in 19 ms. Remains 96 /107 variables (removed 11) and now considering 268/292 (removed 24) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:13:28] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 242 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 242 rows 96 cols
[2024-06-02 20:13:28] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 20:13:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 85 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:13:28] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 242 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:13:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:13:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 35 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:13:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 114 ms returned [58]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 212 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 95/107 places, 268/292 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 95 /95 variables (removed 0) and now considering 268/268 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 239 ms. Remains : 95/107 places, 268/292 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:13:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:13:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:13:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 268 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:13:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:13:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:13:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12987301739618659932.gal : 2 ms
[2024-06-02 20:13:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7791567288279332735.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12987301739618659932.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7791567288279332735.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.01593e+06,0.815491,32180,2,2213,5,82317,6,0,647,86380,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AG(((p3==0)||(p100==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(TRUE U !(((p3==0)||(p100==0))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t4, t6, t10, t11, t13, t14, t15, t17, t19, t23, t24, t26, t27, t28, t30, t32, t36...584
(forward)formula 0,0,8.98389,250260,1,0,563,1.30181e+06,561,290,5388,975050,654
FORMULA FireWire-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 107/107 places, 292/292 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 102 transition count 279
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 102 transition count 279
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 102 transition count 277
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 100 transition count 273
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 100 transition count 273
Applied a total of 16 rules in 8 ms. Remains 100 /107 variables (removed 7) and now considering 273/292 (removed 19) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:13:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 247 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 247 rows 100 cols
[2024-06-02 20:13:37] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-02 20:13:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:13:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 247 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:13:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:13:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 37 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:13:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 114 ms returned [62]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 183 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 99/107 places, 273/292 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 99 /99 variables (removed 0) and now considering 273/273 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 192 ms. Remains : 99/107 places, 273/292 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:13:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:13:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-06-02 20:13:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 273 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:13:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:13:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:13:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13636134490581355691.gal : 1 ms
[2024-06-02 20:13:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11479890553269895754.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13636134490581355691.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11479890553269895754.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.38249e+06,1.20015,42492,2,2854,5,118740,6,0,668,112298,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((AG(((p34==1) + AX(((p8==0)||(p28==0))))) * AF(((p10==1)&&(p42==1)))) * ((p79==1)||((p3==1)&&(p98==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((p79==1)||((p3==1)&&(p98==1)))) * !(E(TRUE U !(((p34==1) + !(EX(!(((p8==0)||(p28==0))))))...203
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t5, t7, t11, t12, t14, t15, t16, t18, t20, t24, t25, t27, t28, t29, t31, t33, t37...584
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-06-02 20:14:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:14:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-06-02 20:14:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9543610910227185118.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9543610910227185118.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9543610910227185118.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9543610910227185118.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9543610910227185118.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-06-02 20:14:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-06-02 20:14:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-06-02 20:14:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 381 redundant transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:14:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-06-02 20:14:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 86 labels/synchronizations in 17 ms.
[2024-06-02 20:14:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16680788419610640432.gal : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:14:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6233060646251489029.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16680788419610640432.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6233060646251489029.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.38249e+06,5.34353,144828,2707,209,213965,4790,518,601578,121,27120,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((AG(((i2.u10.p34==1) + AX(((i2.u2.p8==0)||(i2.u9.p28==0))))) * AF(((i0.i1.u3.p10==1)&&(i0.i0.u14.p42==1)))) * ((i5.u22.p79==1)||((i0....191
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((i5.u22.p79==1)||((i0.i0.u0.p3==1)&&(i0.i0.u30.p98==1)))) * !(E(TRUE U !(((i2.u10.p34==1)...267
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t42, t44, t48, t49, t51, t58, t60, t102, t141, t153, t187, t189, t192, t204, t206, t240, ...861
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
(forward)formula 0,1,24.8548,621292,1,0,946960,24158,2942,2.99444e+06,620,126056,1540841
FORMULA FireWire-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 107/107 places, 292/292 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 102 transition count 279
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 102 transition count 279
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 102 transition count 277
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 99 transition count 271
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 99 transition count 271
Applied a total of 18 rules in 3 ms. Remains 99 /107 variables (removed 8) and now considering 271/292 (removed 21) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:14:32] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 245 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 245 rows 99 cols
[2024-06-02 20:14:33] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-02 20:14:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:14:33] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 245 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:14:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:14:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 37 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:14:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 112 ms returned [61]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 168 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/107 places, 271/292 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 271/271 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 172 ms. Remains : 98/107 places, 271/292 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:14:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-06-02 20:14:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:14:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 271 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:14:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:14:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-06-02 20:14:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6721608525873560618.gal : 1 ms
[2024-06-02 20:14:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3907159316154638507.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6721608525873560618.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3907159316154638507.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.34646e+06,1.3165,45192,2,2752,5,126707,6,0,662,117682,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(!(((p7==1)&&(p80==1))) U EG((EF(((p10==1)&&(p75==1))) * (EX(((p64==1)&&(p90==1))) + !(E(((p38==1)&&(p49==1)) U (p5==1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,!(EG((E(TRUE U ((p10==1)&&(p75==1))) * (EX(((p64==1)&&(p90==1))) + !(E(((p38==1)&&(p49==1)) U (p5=...448
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t5, t7, t11, t12, t14, t15, t16, t18, t20, t24, t25, t27, t28, t29, t31, t33, t37...584
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,9.65574,273988,1,0,653,1.51509e+06,583,349,5737,1.11681e+06,761
FORMULA FireWire-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 107/107 places, 292/292 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 106 transition count 290
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 105 transition count 290
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 105 transition count 289
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 104 transition count 289
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 100 transition count 279
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 100 transition count 279
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 100 transition count 277
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 98 transition count 273
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 98 transition count 273
Applied a total of 18 rules in 21 ms. Remains 98 /107 variables (removed 9) and now considering 273/292 (removed 19) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:14:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 247 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 247 rows 98 cols
[2024-06-02 20:14:42] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 20:14:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:14:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 247 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:14:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:14:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:14:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 120 ms returned [58]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 189 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 97/107 places, 273/292 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 97 /97 variables (removed 0) and now considering 273/273 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 215 ms. Remains : 97/107 places, 273/292 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:14:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:14:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:14:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 273 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:14:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:14:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-06-02 20:14:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3830224575002175454.gal : 2 ms
[2024-06-02 20:14:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16324710029461703484.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3830224575002175454.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16324710029461703484.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-reach command run as :

RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2557 resets) in 99 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...329
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16324710029461703484.prop.
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (686 resets) in 28 ms. (1379 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 5
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :5 after 12
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :12 after 21
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :21 after 33
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :33 after 61
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :61 after 113
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :113 after 348
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :348 after 2130
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :2130 after 8240
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 2048
SDD size :8240 after 23566
Reachability property FireWire-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-11 is true.
FORMULA FireWire-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL COLLATERAL_PROCESSING
Found states matching all0 target predicate
Will report total states built up to this point. Computation was interrupted after 2049 fixpoint passes
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
petri\_inst\_inst,622756,0.751972,29072,2,1777,17,72653,6,0,660,76352,0
Total reachable state count : 622756

Verifying 1 reachability properties.
Reachability property FireWire-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-11 is true.

Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
FireWire-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-11,408,0.752622,29072,2,141,17,72653,7,0,666,76352,0
Finished probabilistic random walk after 1072088 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 1395 ms. (steps per millisecond=768 )
Probabilistic random walk after 1072088 steps, saw 196873 distinct states, run finished after 1400 ms. (steps per millisecond=765 ) properties seen :1
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 107/107 places, 292/292 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 103 transition count 282
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 103 transition count 282
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 103 transition count 280
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 102 transition count 278
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 102 transition count 278
Applied a total of 12 rules in 3 ms. Remains 102 /107 variables (removed 5) and now considering 278/292 (removed 14) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:14:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 252 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 252 rows 102 cols
[2024-06-02 20:14:44] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 20:14:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:14:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 252 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:14:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:14:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:14:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 116 ms returned [64]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 166 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 101/107 places, 278/292 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 101 /101 variables (removed 0) and now considering 278/278 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 170 ms. Remains : 101/107 places, 278/292 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:14:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:14:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:14:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 278 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:14:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:14:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:14:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15770726128721403676.gal : 1 ms
[2024-06-02 20:14:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14346843039370859041.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15770726128721403676.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14346843039370859041.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.45868e+06,1.10456,40304,2,2933,5,113212,6,0,681,106183,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((EG((p29==0)) * AF(((p3==0)||(p94==0)))) * (EX(((((p7==0)||(p51==0))||(((p9==1)&&(p17==1))||((p11==1)&&(p35==1))))&&((((p5==1)&&(p1==...220
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((EG((p29==0)) * !(EG(!(((p3==0)||(p94==0)))))) * (EX(((((p7==0)||(p51==0))||(((p9==1)&&(p17==1))||((...293
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t5, t7, t11, t12, t14, t15, t16, t18, t20, t24, t25, t27, t28, t29, t31, t33, t37...596
(forward)formula 0,0,3.03328,81844,1,0,500,372109,583,258,5820,362151,573
FORMULA FireWire-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 107/107 places, 292/292 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 106 transition count 290
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 105 transition count 290
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 105 transition count 289
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 104 transition count 289
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 100 transition count 279
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 100 transition count 279
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 100 transition count 277
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 98 transition count 273
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 98 transition count 273
Applied a total of 18 rules in 13 ms. Remains 98 /107 variables (removed 9) and now considering 273/292 (removed 19) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:14:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 247 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 247 rows 98 cols
[2024-06-02 20:14:47] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 20:14:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:14:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 247 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:14:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:14:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:14:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 113 ms returned [60]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 159 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 97/107 places, 273/292 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 97 /97 variables (removed 0) and now considering 273/273 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 175 ms. Remains : 97/107 places, 273/292 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:14:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-02 20:14:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:14:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 273 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:14:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-02 20:14:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:14:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5331292533801244049.gal : 1 ms
[2024-06-02 20:14:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability417407807090438286.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5331292533801244049.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability417407807090438286.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.07236e+06,0.978568,37136,2,2508,5,102874,6,0,660,99800,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(!(E((((p3==1)&&(p41==1))||(!((p9==1)&&(p16==1)))) U E((p82==1) U ((p10==1)&&(p73==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E((((p3==1)&&(p41==1))||(!((p9==1)&&(p16==1)))) U E((p82==1) U ((p10==1)&&(p73==1))))))] !...162
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t4, t6, t10, t11, t13, t14, t15, t17, t19, t23, t24, t26, t27, t28, t30, t32, t36...596
(forward)formula 0,1,6.63504,201220,1,0,739,1.11287e+06,567,390,5438,1.06378e+06,839
FORMULA FireWire-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 107/107 places, 292/292 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 106 transition count 290
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 105 transition count 290
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 105 transition count 289
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 104 transition count 289
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 99 transition count 276
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 99 transition count 276
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 99 transition count 274
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 96 transition count 268
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 96 transition count 268
Applied a total of 22 rules in 15 ms. Remains 96 /107 variables (removed 11) and now considering 268/292 (removed 24) transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:14:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 242 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 242 rows 96 cols
[2024-06-02 20:14:54] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-02 20:14:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2024-06-02 20:14:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 242 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
[2024-06-02 20:14:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-02 20:14:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 35 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-02 20:14:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 129 ms returned [58]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 181 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 95/107 places, 268/292 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 95 /95 variables (removed 0) and now considering 268/268 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 201 ms. Remains : 95/107 places, 268/292 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:14:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-06-02 20:14:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:14:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 268 transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:14:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:14:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:14:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability160107661691363136.gal : 1 ms
[2024-06-02 20:14:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8368616726799004092.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability160107661691363136.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8368616726799004092.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.01593e+06,0.85802,32468,2,2213,5,82317,6,0,647,86380,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG(!(E(AF(((p8==1)&&(p84==1))) U (!(((p3==1)&&(p72==1))) * AF(((p4==1)&&(p46==1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(!(E(!(EG(!(((p8==1)&&(p84==1))))) U (!(((p3==1)&&(p72==1))) * !(EG(!(((p4==1)&&(p46==1...177
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t4, t6, t10, t11, t13, t14, t15, t17, t19, t23, t24, t26, t27, t28, t30, t32, t36...584
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-06-02 20:15:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-06-02 20:15:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-06-02 20:15:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6514429735945508522.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6514429735945508522.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6514429735945508522.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6514429735945508522.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6514429735945508522.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-06-02 20:15:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-06-02 20:15:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-06-02 20:15:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 373 redundant transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:15:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-06-02 20:15:25] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 66 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2024-06-02 20:15:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14337208225418013137.gal : 1 ms
[2024-06-02 20:15:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16927668190847079565.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14337208225418013137.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16927668190847079565.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.01593e+06,14.6646,506676,3046,235,348647,4391,418,5.25991e+06,122,39176,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG(!(E(AF(((i2.u2.p8==1)&&(i5.u31.p84==1))) U (!(((i0.u0.p3==1)&&(i1.u21.p72==1))) * AF(((i1.u1.p4==1)&&(i1.u14.p46==1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(!(E(!(EG(!(((i2.u2.p8==1)&&(i5.u31.p84==1))))) U (!(((i0.u0.p3==1)&&(i1.u21.p72==1))) ...216
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t41, t43, t47, t48, t57, t59, t101, t117, t122, t127, t132, t137, t140, t152, t188, t191,...725
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-06-02 20:15:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-02 20:15:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-02 20:15:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-06-02 20:15:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14511555730270593950.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14511555730270593950.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14511555730270593950.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14511555730270593950.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14511555730270593950.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-06-02 20:15:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-06-02 20:15:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-06-02 20:15:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 432 redundant transitions.
[2024-06-02 20:15:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-06-02 20:15:55] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 85 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2024-06-02 20:15:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9095536496590300062.gal : 2 ms
[2024-06-02 20:15:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17733062722515776768.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9095536496590300062.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17733062722515776768.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.68905e+06,2.32196,74912,935,160,124841,1563,528,258606,103,14888,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG(!(E(AF(((i6.u2.p8==1)&&(i7.u34.p84==1))) U (!(((i0.u0.p3==1)&&(i5.u22.p72==1))) * AF(((i1.u1.p4==1)&&(i1.u15.p46==1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(!(E(!(EG(!(((i6.u2.p8==1)&&(i7.u34.p84==1))))) U (!(((i0.u0.p3==1)&&(i5.u22.p72==1))) ...216
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t42, t44, t45, t48, t49, t50, t56, t57, t58, t59, t62, t64, t105, t107, t123, t128, t133,...722
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
(forward)formula 0,0,12.8935,367432,1,0,626802,6169,2867,1.30929e+06,496,37940,1162766
FORMULA FireWire-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Total runtime 421008 ms.

BK_STOP 1717359368354

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="FireWire-PT-02"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is FireWire-PT-02, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r550-tall-171734898700178"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/FireWire-PT-02.tgz
mv FireWire-PT-02 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;