fond
Model Checking Contest 2024
14th edition, Geneva, Switzerland, June 25, 2024
Execution of r544-smll-171701110900187
Last Updated
July 7, 2024

About the Execution of LTSMin+red for UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
402.500 23524.00 45620.00 318.90 FFFFTFFFTTFFTFFF normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r544-smll-171701110900187.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.....................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool ltsminxred
Input is UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04, examination is LTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r544-smll-171701110900187
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 748K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 13 05:10 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 110K Apr 13 05:10 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 13 05:06 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 81K Apr 13 05:06 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.1K Apr 23 08:04 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 36K Apr 23 08:04 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K Apr 23 08:04 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K Apr 23 08:04 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 13 05:16 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 111K Apr 13 05:16 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 38K Apr 13 05:14 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 184K Apr 13 05:14 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.5K Apr 23 08:04 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.1K Apr 23 08:04 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 47K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-00
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-01
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-02
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-03
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-04
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-05
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-06
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-07
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-08
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-09
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1717273473060

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=ltsminxred
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Applying reductions before tool ltsmin
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-06-01 20:24:35] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLCardinality, -timeout, 360, -rebuildPNML]
[2024-06-01 20:24:35] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-06-01 20:24:35] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 83 ms
[2024-06-01 20:24:35] [INFO ] Transformed 72 places.
[2024-06-01 20:24:35] [INFO ] Transformed 108 transitions.
[2024-06-01 20:24:35] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 72 places and 108 transitions and 340 arcs in 268 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLCardinality.xml in 22 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
Ensure Unique test removed 16 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 16 transitions.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 61 out of 72 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 14 ms. Remains 72 /72 variables (removed 0) and now considering 92/92 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 72 cols
[2024-06-01 20:24:35] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 20 ms
[2024-06-01 20:24:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 252 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 20:24:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 20:24:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 142 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 578 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 88 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 20:24:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/72 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 92/164 variables, 72/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/164 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 164/164 variables, and 83 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 2489 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/72 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 92/164 variables, 72/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 88/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/164 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 164/164 variables, and 171 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 2355 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4991ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5015ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5643 ms. Remains : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Support contains 61 out of 72 places after structural reductions.
[2024-06-01 20:24:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 56 ms
[2024-06-01 20:24:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2024-06-01 20:24:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 2225 ms. (17 steps per ms) remains 9/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 226 ms. (176 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 207 ms. (192 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 103 ms. (384 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 217 ms. (183 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 152 ms. (261 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 134 ms. (296 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 87 ms. (454 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 91 ms. (434 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 92 ms. (430 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
[2024-06-01 20:24:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp5 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp17 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp18 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp19 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp21 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp28 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp29 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp30 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp31 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 72/164 variables, and 11 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 9 solved, 0 unsolved in 119 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 0/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 130ms problems are : Problem set: 9 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Successfully simplified 9 atomic propositions for a total of 12 simplifications.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F((G(p0)||(p1 U (p2||G(p1)))))))'
Support contains 11 out of 72 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Performed 16 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 72 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 56 transition count 68
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 56 transition count 60
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 48 transition count 60
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 44 transition count 56
Applied a total of 64 rules in 31 ms. Remains 44 /72 variables (removed 28) and now considering 56/92 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 44 cols
[2024-06-01 20:24:43] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-06-01 20:24:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned [23]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 74 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 43/72 places, 56/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 43 /43 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 108 ms. Remains : 43/72 places, 56/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 279 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-00
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1039 reset in 609 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 86 steps with 2 reset with depth 28 and stack size 28 in 1 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-00 finished in 1099 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G(p0)))'
Support contains 23 out of 72 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 72 /72 variables (removed 0) and now considering 92/92 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 72 cols
[2024-06-01 20:24:44] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 20:24:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 88 ms returned [51]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 89 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 71/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 71 /71 variables (removed 0) and now considering 92/92 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 93 ms. Remains : 71/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 98 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-01
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 11 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-01 finished in 207 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 12 out of 72 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Performed 16 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 72 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 56 transition count 68
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 56 transition count 60
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 48 transition count 60
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 47 transition count 52
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 47 transition count 52
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 43 transition count 48
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 43 transition count 48
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 39 transition count 40
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 39 transition count 40
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 34 transition count 36
Applied a total of 83 rules in 17 ms. Remains 34 /72 variables (removed 38) and now considering 36/92 (removed 56) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 36 rows 34 cols
[2024-06-01 20:24:44] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-06-01 20:24:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned [21]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 40 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 33/72 places, 36/92 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 29 transition count 32
Applied a total of 8 rules in 3 ms. Remains 29 /33 variables (removed 4) and now considering 32/36 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 29 cols
[2024-06-01 20:24:44] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-06-01 20:24:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 20:24:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 20:24:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 52 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 83 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 29/72 places, 32/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 144 ms. Remains : 29/72 places, 32/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 84 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-03
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 8387 reset in 251 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 189 steps with 13 reset with depth 19 and stack size 19 in 1 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-03 finished in 492 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(((G(p0) U p1)||(p1 U G(p2))))))'
Support contains 15 out of 72 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 64 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 64 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 3 ms. Remains 64 /72 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 64 cols
[2024-06-01 20:24:45] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 20:24:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned [42]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 74 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 63 /63 variables (removed 0) and now considering 84/84 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 79 ms. Remains : 63/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 338 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), true, (NOT p0), (NOT p1), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-04
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 145 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 339 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 (NOT p0) p2), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0 p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) p2)))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 8 factoid took 26 ms. Reduced automaton from 8 states, 20 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-04 finished in 967 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G((p0||(p1&&X(p2))))))'
Support contains 9 out of 72 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 64 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 64 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 4 ms. Remains 64 /72 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
[2024-06-01 20:24:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 20:24:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned [42]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 83 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 63 /63 variables (removed 0) and now considering 84/84 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 89 ms. Remains : 63/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 165 ms :[true, (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p2) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-05
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-05 finished in 274 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 24 out of 72 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 72 transition count 84
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 64 transition count 84
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 60 transition count 80
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 55 transition count 76
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 47 transition count 68
Applied a total of 49 rules in 11 ms. Remains 47 /72 variables (removed 25) and now considering 68/92 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 47 cols
[2024-06-01 20:24:46] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 20:24:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned [38]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 75 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 46/72 places, 68/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 68/68 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 90 ms. Remains : 46/72 places, 68/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 38 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-06
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 243 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 3 steps with 0 reset with depth 4 and stack size 4 in 0 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-06 finished in 384 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(((p0&&X(p1))||(X(p1)&&(!p1 U (p2||G(!p1))))))))'
Support contains 22 out of 72 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 64 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 64 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 3 ms. Remains 64 /72 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 64 cols
[2024-06-01 20:24:46] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 20:24:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 91 ms returned [42, 43]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 92 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 62 /62 variables (removed 0) and now considering 84/84 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 97 ms. Remains : 62/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 193 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p1) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-07
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 8296 reset in 219 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 8286 reset in 334 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p1)), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1))), (X (OR p0 p2 (NOT p1))), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (OR p0 p2 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 13 factoid took 229 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 10 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 10 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 178 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p1) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1)]
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 7 to 6
RANDOM walk for 600 steps (0 resets) in 13 ms. (42 steps per ms) remains 0/6 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p1)), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1))), (X (OR p0 p2 (NOT p1))), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (OR p0 p2 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (OR p0 p2 (NOT p1)))), (F p1), (F p0), (F (NOT p2)), (F (NOT (OR p0 p2 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (OR p0 p2 p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 13 factoid took 538 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 10 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 10 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 195 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p1) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 188 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p1) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1)]
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 62 cols
[2024-06-01 20:24:49] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 20:24:49] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 20:24:49] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 49 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 20:24:49] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-06-01 20:24:49] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 20:24:49] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 48 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 20:24:49] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 80/124/80 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 10 ms.
[2024-06-01 20:24:49] [INFO ] Added : 62 causal constraints over 13 iterations in 176 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p1)
Support contains 22 out of 62 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 62/62 places, 84/84 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 62 /62 variables (removed 0) and now considering 84/84 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 20:24:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 20:24:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 20:24:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 20:24:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 122 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 80 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 20:24:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/62 variables, 8/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 84/146 variables, 62/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/146 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 146/146 variables, and 71 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 1762 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/62 variables, 8/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 84/146 variables, 62/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 80/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/146 variables, 0/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 146/146 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 1909 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3704ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3706ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3830 ms. Remains : 62/62 places, 84/84 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p1)), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1))), (X (OR p0 p2 (NOT p1))), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (OR p0 p2 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 13 factoid took 233 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 10 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 10 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 173 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p1) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1)]
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 7 to 6
RANDOM walk for 250 steps (0 resets) in 7 ms. (31 steps per ms) remains 0/6 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p1)), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1))), (X (OR p0 p2 (NOT p1))), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (OR p0 p2 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (OR p0 p2 (NOT p1)))), (F p1), (F p0), (F (NOT p2)), (F (NOT (OR p0 p2 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (OR p0 p2 p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 13 factoid took 517 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 10 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 10 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 185 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p1) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 175 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p1) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1)]
[2024-06-01 20:24:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 20:24:54] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 20:24:54] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 47 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 20:24:54] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-06-01 20:24:54] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 20:24:54] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 43 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 20:24:54] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 80/124/80 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 9 ms.
[2024-06-01 20:24:55] [INFO ] Added : 44 causal constraints over 9 iterations in 99 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p1)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 186 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p1) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 8307 reset in 221 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 18771 steps with 1557 reset with depth 15 and stack size 15 in 74 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-07 finished in 8709 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((F((G(p0)&&X(G(p1)))) U p2)))'
Support contains 4 out of 72 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 64 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 64 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 4 ms. Remains 64 /72 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 64 cols
[2024-06-01 20:24:55] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-06-01 20:24:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned [43]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 60 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 63 /63 variables (removed 0) and now considering 84/84 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 66 ms. Remains : 63/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 219 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-12
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 111 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 130 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 p0 (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p0))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (X p2), (X p0), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p0)))), (X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))))), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 12 factoid took 28 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 14 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-12 finished in 578 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(X(F(p0)))))'
Support contains 2 out of 72 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 64 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 64 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 4 ms. Remains 64 /72 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
[2024-06-01 20:24:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 20:24:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned [42]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 78 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 63 /63 variables (removed 0) and now considering 84/84 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 84 ms. Remains : 63/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 172 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-13
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 506 reset in 136 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 346 steps with 1 reset with depth 220 and stack size 220 in 1 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLCardinality-13 finished in 407 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 21462 ms.
ITS solved all properties within timeout

BK_STOP 1717273496584

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLCardinality -timeout 360 -rebuildPNML

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="ltsminxred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool ltsminxred"
echo " Input is UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04, examination is LTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r544-smll-171701110900187"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04.tgz
mv UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;