fond
Model Checking Contest 2024
14th edition, Geneva, Switzerland, June 25, 2024
Execution of r540-smll-171690573500068
Last Updated
July 7, 2024

About the Execution of LTSMin+red for TCPcondis-PT-50

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
421.995 61198.00 93979.00 772.40 FFFFFFFFFFTFFTFF normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r540-smll-171690573500068.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool ltsminxred
Input is TCPcondis-PT-50, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r540-smll-171690573500068
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 508K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 67K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.1K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 57K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K Apr 23 08:02 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K Apr 23 08:02 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K May 19 07:37 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 19 19:28 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K Apr 12 03:03 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 143K Apr 12 03:03 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.5K Apr 12 03:03 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 73K Apr 12 03:03 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 23 08:02 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 23 08:02 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rwxr-xr-x 1 mcc users 24K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1717230058826

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=ltsminxred
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=TCPcondis-PT-50
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Applying reductions before tool ltsmin
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-06-01 08:21:01] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -timeout, 360, -rebuildPNML]
[2024-06-01 08:21:01] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-06-01 08:21:01] [WARNING] Skipping unknown tool specific annotation : Tina
[2024-06-01 08:21:01] [WARNING] Unknown XML tag in source file: size
[2024-06-01 08:21:01] [WARNING] Unknown XML tag in source file: color
[2024-06-01 08:21:01] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 113 ms
[2024-06-01 08:21:01] [INFO ] Transformed 30 places.
[2024-06-01 08:21:01] [INFO ] Transformed 32 transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:21:01] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 30 places and 32 transitions and 108 arcs in 343 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 28 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 5 formulas.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 20 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 28 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2024-06-01 08:21:02] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 24 ms
[2024-06-01 08:21:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 328 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:21:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:21:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 152 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 559 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:21:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 1060 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 705 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1854ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1891ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2522 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Support contains 20 out of 30 places after structural reductions.
[2024-06-01 08:21:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 44 ms
[2024-06-01 08:21:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2024-06-01 08:21:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 18 to 17
RANDOM walk for 16588 steps (2 resets) in 174 ms. (94 steps per ms) remains 0/17 properties
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((p0&&X(G((p0||X(G(p1)))))) U G(p2)))'
Support contains 3 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:21:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:21:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:21:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:21:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 140 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 218 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:21:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 744 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 732 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1511ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1513ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1735 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 524 ms :[(NOT p2), true, (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p2), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-01
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 25 steps with 0 reset in 6 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-01 finished in 2394 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(X(X(G((X(p1)||p0)))))))'
Support contains 2 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:21:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:21:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:21:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:21:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 97 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 174 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:21:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 753 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 799 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1581ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1583ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1760 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 383 ms :[true, (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-03
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 24 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-03 finished in 2172 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F((p0||G(p1)||G(p2)))))'
Support contains 6 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:21:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:21:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:21:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:21:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 69 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 123 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:21:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 582 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 707 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1312ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1313ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1439 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 116 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-04
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 15435 reset in 562 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 15434 reset in 394 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) p2), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) p2)), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0) p2))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0) p2)))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) p2)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 13 factoid took 463 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 5 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 6 states, 17 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 332 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), false, false, false, false]
RANDOM walk for 40009 steps (8 resets) in 238 ms. (167 steps per ms) remains 1/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 2324 steps (0 resets) in 33 ms. (68 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) p2), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) p2)), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0) p2))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0) p2)))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) p2)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p2 p1))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT p2)), (F (NOT (OR p0 p2 p1))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR p0 p2 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (F p1)]
Knowledge based reduction with 13 factoid took 1197 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 17 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 6 states, 17 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 326 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), false, false, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 330 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), false, false, false, false]
Support contains 6 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 28 transition count 30
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 27 transition count 29
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 27 transition count 29
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 27 transition count 27
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 27 transition count 25
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 25 transition count 25
Applied a total of 12 rules in 57 ms. Remains 25 /30 variables (removed 5) and now considering 25/32 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 25 rows 25 cols
[2024-06-01 08:21:15] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-01 08:21:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:21:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:21:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 127 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 08:21:15] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 23 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:21:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 25/50 variables, 25/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/50 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 50/50 variables, and 34 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 373 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 25/50 variables, 25/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 23/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/50 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 50/50 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 283 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 671ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 672ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 25/30 places, 25/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 866 ms. Remains : 25/30 places, 25/32 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p1)), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1))), (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 (NOT p1)))), (X (AND (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2 p1))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1))), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2 p1)))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND p0 p2 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 20 factoid took 445 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 17 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 6 states, 17 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 474 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), false, false, false, false]
RANDOM walk for 40103 steps (8 resets) in 224 ms. (178 steps per ms) remains 1/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 1741 steps (0 resets) in 18 ms. (91 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p1)), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1))), (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 (NOT p1)))), (X (AND (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2 p1))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1))), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2 p1)))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND p0 p2 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p2 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p2 p1))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT p2)), (F (NOT (OR p0 p2 p1))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR p0 p2 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (F p1)]
Knowledge based reduction with 20 factoid took 992 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 17 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 6 states, 17 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 356 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), false, false, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 341 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), false, false, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 327 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), false, false, false, false]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 19421 reset in 306 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 10155 steps with 1965 reset with depth 14 and stack size 14 in 67 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-04 finished in 9651 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F((X(p1)||p0))))'
Support contains 7 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2024-06-01 08:21:19] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-06-01 08:21:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:21:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:21:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 140 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:21:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 749 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 679 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1442ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1444ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1587 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 161 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-08
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 14143 reset in 133 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 14309 reset in 139 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 350 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 152 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 514 steps (0 resets) in 5 ms. (85 steps per ms) remains 0/3 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (F p1), (F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 346 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 154 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 145 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
[2024-06-01 08:21:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:21:22] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 08:21:22] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 08:21:22] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 25 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 08:21:23] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 28/100/28 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 7 ms.
[2024-06-01 08:21:23] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-06-01 08:21:23] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 08:21:23] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 08:21:23] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 36 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 08:21:23] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 28/100/28 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 7 ms.
[2024-06-01 08:21:23] [INFO ] Added : 27 causal constraints over 6 iterations in 80 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))
Support contains 7 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:21:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:21:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:21:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:21:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 101 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 165 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:21:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 711 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 676 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1402ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1404ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1570 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 229 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 147 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 411 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (82 steps per ms) remains 0/3 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (F p1), (F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 324 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 154 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 151 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
[2024-06-01 08:21:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:21:25] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 08:21:25] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 08:21:25] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 25 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 08:21:25] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 28/100/28 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 4 ms.
[2024-06-01 08:21:25] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-06-01 08:21:26] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 08:21:26] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 08:21:26] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 27 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 08:21:26] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 28/100/28 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 6 ms.
[2024-06-01 08:21:26] [INFO ] Added : 27 causal constraints over 6 iterations in 67 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 149 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 14259 reset in 198 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 14144 reset in 216 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 147 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Support contains 7 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 30 transition count 32
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Applied a total of 3 rules in 5 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:21:27] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2024-06-01 08:21:27] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 3 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 2/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 2/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Problem TDEAD2 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved in 724 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/28 variables, 2/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 2/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 25/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 64 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved in 579 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 25/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1319ms problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 3 dead transitions in 1321ms
Found 3 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 3 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 3 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 30/30 places, 29/32 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 72 edges and 30 vertex of which 27 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 3 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 3 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 7 ms. Remains 27 /30 variables (removed 3) and now considering 29/29 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 27/30 places, 29/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 1344 ms. Remains : 27/30 places, 29/32 transitions.
Support contains 7 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2024-06-01 08:21:28] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-01 08:21:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:21:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:21:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 128 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:21:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 805 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 711 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1532ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1534ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1664 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-08 finished in 10765 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F((p0||G(p1)))))'
Support contains 4 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:21:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:21:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:21:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:21:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 90 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 155 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:21:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 692 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 657 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1363ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1364ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1521 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 131 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-09
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 15595 reset in 184 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 15358 reset in 207 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 287 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 9 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 361 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), false, false]
RANDOM walk for 25681 steps (5 resets) in 28 ms. (885 steps per ms) remains 0/6 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1)))), (F p1), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 525 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 9 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 4 states, 9 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 195 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 201 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), false, false]
[2024-06-01 08:21:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:21:34] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 08:21:34] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 08:21:34] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 24 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 08:21:34] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 28/100/28 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 5 ms.
[2024-06-01 08:21:34] [INFO ] Added : 1 causal constraints over 1 iterations in 18 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))
Support contains 4 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 27 transition count 29
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 25 transition count 27
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 25 transition count 27
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 25 transition count 25
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 25 transition count 23
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 23 transition count 23
Applied a total of 16 rules in 12 ms. Remains 23 /30 variables (removed 7) and now considering 23/32 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 23 rows 23 cols
[2024-06-01 08:21:34] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-01 08:21:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:21:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:21:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 113 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 08:21:34] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 21 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:21:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 23/46 variables, 23/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/46 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 46/46 variables, and 32 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 342 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 23/46 variables, 23/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 21/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/46 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 46/46 variables, and 53 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 420 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 772ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 773ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 23/30 places, 23/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 907 ms. Remains : 23/30 places, 23/32 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1))), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 10 factoid took 431 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 9 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 4 states, 9 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 203 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), false, false]
RANDOM walk for 30505 steps (6 resets) in 29 ms. (1016 steps per ms) remains 0/6 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1))), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1)))), (F p1), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 10 factoid took 725 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 9 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 4 states, 9 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 198 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 297 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), false, false]
[2024-06-01 08:21:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:21:37] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 08:21:37] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive and 7 generalized place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 08:21:37] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 19 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 08:21:37] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 21/75/21 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 5 ms.
[2024-06-01 08:21:37] [INFO ] Added : 0 causal constraints over 0 iterations in 12 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 200 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), false, false]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 19361 reset in 220 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 7569 steps with 1438 reset with depth 14 and stack size 14 in 18 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-09 finished in 7155 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 26 transition count 28
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 24 transition count 26
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 24 transition count 26
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 24 transition count 24
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 24 transition count 22
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 22 transition count 22
Applied a total of 18 rules in 13 ms. Remains 22 /30 variables (removed 8) and now considering 22/32 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 22 rows 22 cols
[2024-06-01 08:21:37] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-01 08:21:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:21:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:21:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 139 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 08:21:37] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 20 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:21:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 22/44 variables, 22/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/44 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 44/44 variables, and 31 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved in 296 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 22/44 variables, 22/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 20/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/44 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 44/44 variables, and 51 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved in 398 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 708ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 709ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 22/30 places, 22/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 870 ms. Remains : 22/30 places, 22/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 102 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-11
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3912 reset in 406 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 11100 steps with 617 reset with depth 12 and stack size 12 in 64 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-11 finished in 1470 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((p0 U (F(G(p0))||G(!p0))))'
Support contains 1 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 27 transition count 29
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 26 transition count 28
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 26 transition count 28
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 26 transition count 26
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 26 transition count 25
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 25 transition count 25
Applied a total of 12 rules in 12 ms. Remains 25 /30 variables (removed 5) and now considering 25/32 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 25 rows 25 cols
[2024-06-01 08:21:39] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 08:21:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:21:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:21:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 87 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 149 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 08:21:39] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 23 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:21:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 4/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/25 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 25/50 variables, 25/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/50 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 50/50 variables, and 34 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 403 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 4/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/25 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 25/50 variables, 25/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 23/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/50 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 50/50 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 388 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 801ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 802ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 25/30 places, 25/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 974 ms. Remains : 25/30 places, 25/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 127 ms :[false, false, (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-12
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 433 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 459 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 74 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 100 ms :[false, false, (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 255 steps (0 resets) in 7 ms. (31 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 94 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 107 ms :[false, false, (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 110 ms :[false, false, (NOT p0)]
Support contains 1 out of 25 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 25/25 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 25 /25 variables (removed 0) and now considering 25/25 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:21:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:21:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:21:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:21:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 89 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 150 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 08:21:41] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 23 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:21:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 4/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/25 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 25/50 variables, 25/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/50 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 50/50 variables, and 34 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 459 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 4/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/25 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 25/50 variables, 25/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 23/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/50 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 50/50 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 516 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 984ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 987ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1146 ms. Remains : 25/25 places, 25/25 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 109 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 157 ms :[false, false, (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 408 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (81 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 141 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 151 ms :[false, false, (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 149 ms :[false, false, (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 147 ms :[false, false, (NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 334 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 384 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 25 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 25/25 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 25 /25 variables (removed 0) and now considering 25/25 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:21:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:21:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:21:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:21:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 79 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 138 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 08:21:44] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 23 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:21:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 4/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/25 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 25/50 variables, 25/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/50 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 50/50 variables, and 34 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 450 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 4/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/25 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 25/50 variables, 25/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 23/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/50 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 50/50 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 504 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 970ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 972ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1120 ms. Remains : 25/25 places, 25/25 transitions.
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-12 finished in 6436 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((G(p0)||G(p1)||G((!p2 U p3)))))'
Support contains 7 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 28 transition count 30
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 27 transition count 29
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 27 transition count 29
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 27 transition count 28
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 27 transition count 27
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 26 transition count 27
Applied a total of 9 rules in 5 ms. Remains 26 /30 variables (removed 4) and now considering 27/32 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 27 rows 26 cols
[2024-06-01 08:21:45] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 08:21:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:21:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:21:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 57 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 92 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 08:21:45] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 24 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:21:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 5/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/26 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 27/53 variables, 26/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/53 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 53/53 variables, and 35 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 410 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 26/26 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 5/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/26 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 27/53 variables, 26/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 24/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/53 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 53/53 variables, and 59 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 398 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 26/26 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 818ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 819ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 26/30 places, 27/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 926 ms. Remains : 26/30 places, 27/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 129 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3))]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-14
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 106 reset in 935 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 100 reset in 625 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1 p3 p2), (X p2), (X p3), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 (NOT p3) p2))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p3) p2))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p3) p2))), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 (NOT p3) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (OR (AND p0 p1 p3) (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (NOT (OR (AND p0 (NOT p1) p3) (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p3) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p3) (NOT p2)))), (X (OR (AND (NOT p0) p1 p3) (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3) p2))), (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p3) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1), (X (X p2)), (X (X p3)), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 (NOT p3) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p3) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p3) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 (NOT p3) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND p0 p1 p3) (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)))))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND p0 (NOT p1) p3) (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p3) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p3) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (OR (AND (NOT p0) p1 p3) (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p3) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 33 factoid took 153 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 20 edges and 4 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 20 edges and 4 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 102 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3))]
RANDOM walk for 40135 steps (8 resets) in 53 ms. (743 steps per ms) remains 2/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 419 ms. (95 steps per ms) remains 1/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 3201 steps (0 resets) in 22 ms. (139 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1 p3 p2), (X p2), (X p3), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 (NOT p3) p2))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p3) p2))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p3) p2))), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 (NOT p3) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (OR (AND p0 p1 p3) (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (NOT (OR (AND p0 (NOT p1) p3) (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p3) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p3) (NOT p2)))), (X (OR (AND (NOT p0) p1 p3) (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3) p2))), (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p3) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1), (X (X p2)), (X (X p3)), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 (NOT p3) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p3) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p3) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 (NOT p3) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND p0 p1 p3) (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)))))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND p0 (NOT p1) p3) (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p3) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p3) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (OR (AND (NOT p0) p1 p3) (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p3) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR p0 p1 p3 p2))), (F (NOT (AND (OR (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p3)) (OR (NOT p0) p1 p2)))), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1) p3 p2))), (F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1 p3 (NOT p2)))), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1) p3 (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (AND (OR p0 p1 (NOT p3)) (OR p0 p1 p2)))), (F (NOT (AND (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2)))), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1 p3 (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p3 p2))), (F (NOT p2)), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p3 (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT p3)), (F (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p0) p1 p3) (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2))))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1 p3 p2)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 33 factoid took 856 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 20 edges and 4 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 20 edges and 4 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 102 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 115 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3))]
Support contains 7 out of 26 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 26/26 places, 27/27 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 26 /26 variables (removed 0) and now considering 27/27 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:21:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:21:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:21:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:21:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 49 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 91 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 08:21:49] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 24 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:21:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 5/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/26 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 27/53 variables, 26/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/53 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 53/53 variables, and 35 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 416 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 26/26 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 5/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/26 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 27/53 variables, 26/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 24/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/53 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 53/53 variables, and 59 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 476 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 26/26 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 908ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 909ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1009 ms. Remains : 26/26 places, 27/27 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1 p3 p2), (X p2), (X p3), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 (NOT p3) p2))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p3) p2))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p3) p2))), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 (NOT p3) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (OR (AND p0 p1 p3) (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (NOT (OR (AND p0 (NOT p1) p3) (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p3) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p3) (NOT p2)))), (X (OR (AND (NOT p0) p1 p3) (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3) p2))), (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p3) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1), (X (X p2)), (X (X p3)), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 (NOT p3) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p3) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p3) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 (NOT p3) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND p0 p1 p3) (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)))))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND p0 (NOT p1) p3) (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p3) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p3) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (OR (AND (NOT p0) p1 p3) (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p3) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 33 factoid took 190 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 20 edges and 4 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 20 edges and 4 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 123 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3))]
RANDOM walk for 40063 steps (8 resets) in 58 ms. (679 steps per ms) remains 3/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 10353 steps (0 resets) in 43 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 0/3 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1 p3 p2), (X p2), (X p3), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 (NOT p3) p2))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p3) p2))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p3) p2))), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 (NOT p3) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (OR (AND p0 p1 p3) (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (NOT (OR (AND p0 (NOT p1) p3) (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p3) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p3) (NOT p2)))), (X (OR (AND (NOT p0) p1 p3) (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3) p2))), (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p3) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1), (X (X p2)), (X (X p3)), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 (NOT p3) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p3) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p3) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 (NOT p3) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND p0 p1 p3) (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)))))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND p0 (NOT p1) p3) (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p3) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p3) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (OR (AND (NOT p0) p1 p3) (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p3) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR p0 p1 p3 p2))), (F (NOT (AND (OR (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p3)) (OR (NOT p0) p1 p2)))), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1) p3 p2))), (F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1 p3 (NOT p2)))), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1) p3 (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (AND (OR p0 p1 (NOT p3)) (OR p0 p1 p2)))), (F (NOT (AND (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2)))), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1 p3 (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p3 p2))), (F (NOT p2)), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p3 (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT p3)), (F (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p0) p1 p3) (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2))))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1 p3 p2)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 33 factoid took 1112 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 20 edges and 4 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 20 edges and 4 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 125 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 129 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 125 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 100 reset in 945 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 106 reset in 675 ms.
Support contains 7 out of 26 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 26/26 places, 27/27 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 26 /26 variables (removed 0) and now considering 27/27 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:21:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:21:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:21:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:21:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 53 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 113 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 08:21:54] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 24 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:21:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 5/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/26 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 27/53 variables, 26/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/53 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 53/53 variables, and 35 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 402 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 26/26 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 5/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/26 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 27/53 variables, 26/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 24/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/53 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 53/53 variables, and 59 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 436 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 26/26 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 864ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 865ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 988 ms. Remains : 26/26 places, 27/27 transitions.
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-14 finished in 9738 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 27 transition count 29
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 25 transition count 27
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 25 transition count 27
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 25 transition count 25
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 25 transition count 23
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 23 transition count 23
Applied a total of 16 rules in 12 ms. Remains 23 /30 variables (removed 7) and now considering 23/32 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 23 rows 23 cols
[2024-06-01 08:21:55] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-06-01 08:21:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 108 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:21:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:21:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 176 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 08:21:55] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 21 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:21:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 23/46 variables, 23/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/46 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 46/46 variables, and 32 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 346 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 23/46 variables, 23/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 21/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/46 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 46/46 variables, and 53 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 392 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 753ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 754ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 23/30 places, 23/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 953 ms. Remains : 23/30 places, 23/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 97 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-15
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1898 reset in 304 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 1153 steps with 16 reset with depth 122 and stack size 122 in 6 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-15 finished in 1376 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F((X(p1)||p0))))'
Found a Shortening insensitive property : TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-08
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 242 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Support contains 7 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 27 transition count 29
Applied a total of 6 rules in 2 ms. Remains 27 /30 variables (removed 3) and now considering 29/32 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 29 rows 27 cols
[2024-06-01 08:21:57] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 08:21:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:21:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:21:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 71 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 120 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 25 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:21:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/27 variables, 5/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 3/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 29/56 variables, 27/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/56 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 56/56 variables, and 36 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved in 455 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 27/27 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/27 variables, 5/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 3/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 29/56 variables, 27/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 25/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/56 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 56/56 variables, and 61 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved in 511 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 27/27 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 974ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 975ms
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 27/30 places, 29/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1097 ms. Remains : 27/30 places, 29/32 transitions.
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-08
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 14204 reset in 470 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 31710 steps with 4506 reset with depth 15 and stack size 15 in 83 ms.
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-08 finished in 2101 ms.
Length sensitive decision was in the wrong direction : Shortening insensitive + false
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((p0 U (F(G(p0))||G(!p0))))'
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((G(p0)||G(p1)||G((!p2 U p3)))))'
[2024-06-01 08:21:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-06-01 08:21:59] [INFO ] Export to MCC of 3 properties in file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.sr.xml took 5 ms.
[2024-06-01 08:21:59] [INFO ] Export to PNML in file /home/mcc/execution/model.sr.pnml of net with 30 places, 32 transitions and 108 arcs took 7 ms.
Total runtime 58005 ms.
There are residual formulas that ITS could not solve within timeout
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT PARALLEL_PROCESSING USE_NUPN
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT PARALLEL_PROCESSING USE_NUPN
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT PARALLEL_PROCESSING USE_NUPN

BK_STOP 1717230120024

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -timeout 360 -rebuildPNML
mcc2024
ltl formula name TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-08
ltl formula formula --ltl=/tmp/1923/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading model from model.pnml
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Edge label is id
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Petri net has 30 places, 32 transitions and 108 arcs
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Petri net Petri analyzed
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): There are no safe places
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading Petri net took 0.010 real 0.000 user 0.000 sys
pnml2lts-mc( 2/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/1923/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/1923/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 3/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/1923/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/1923/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): buchi has 3 states
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Weak Buchi automaton detected, adding non-accepting as progress label.
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): There are 32 state labels and 1 edge labels
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): State length is 31, there are 49 groups
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Running ufscc using 4 cores
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Using a tree table with 2^25 elements
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Successor permutation: dynamic
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Global bits: 0, count bits: 0, local bits: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4): ~197 levels ~10000 states ~33836 transitions
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Accepting cycle FOUND at depth ~457!
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): total scc count: 5822
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): unique states count: 7165
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): unique transitions count: 41911
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - self-loop count: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim dead count: 9800
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim found count: 1
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim success count: 7170
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - cum. max stack depth: 1414
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Explored 7170 states 42007 transitions, fanout: 5.859
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Total exploration time 0.160 sec (0.160 sec minimum, 0.160 sec on average)
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): States per second: 44812, Transitions per second: 262544
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Queue width: 12B, total height: 0, memory: 0.00MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Tree memory: 0.3MB, 24.8 B/state, compr.: 19.7%
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Tree fill ratio (roots/leafs): 0.0%/0.0%
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Stored 32 string chucks using 0MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Total memory used for chunk indexing: 0MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Est. total memory use: 0.3MB (~256.0MB paged-in)
ltl formula name TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-12
ltl formula formula --ltl=/tmp/1923/ltl_1_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading model from model.pnml
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Edge label is id
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Petri net has 30 places, 32 transitions and 108 arcs
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Petri net Petri analyzed
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): There are no safe places
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading Petri net took 0.010 real 0.000 user 0.000 sys
pnml2lts-mc( 3/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/1923/ltl_1_
pnml2lts-mc( 2/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/1923/ltl_1_
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/1923/ltl_1_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/1923/ltl_1_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): buchi has 4 states
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): There are 31 state labels and 1 edge labels
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): State length is 31, there are 40 groups
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Running ufscc using 4 cores
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Using a tree table with 2^25 elements
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Successor permutation: dynamic
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Global bits: 0, count bits: 0, local bits: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 3/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 3/ 4): Accepting cycle FOUND at depth ~126!
pnml2lts-mc( 3/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): total scc count: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): unique states count: 425
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): unique transitions count: 1907
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - self-loop count: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim dead count: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim found count: 1
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim success count: 428
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - cum. max stack depth: 428
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Explored 428 states 1923 transitions, fanout: 4.493
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Total exploration time 0.020 sec (0.020 sec minimum, 0.020 sec on average)
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): States per second: 21400, Transitions per second: 96150
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Queue width: 12B, total height: 0, memory: 0.00MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Tree memory: 0.0MB, 25.5 B/state, compr.: 20.2%
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Tree fill ratio (roots/leafs): 0.0%/0.0%
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Stored 32 string chucks using 0MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Total memory used for chunk indexing: 0MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Est. total memory use: 0.0MB (~256.0MB paged-in)
ltl formula name TCPcondis-PT-50-LTLFireability-14
ltl formula formula --ltl=/tmp/1923/ltl_2_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading model from model.pnml
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Edge label is id
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Petri net has 30 places, 32 transitions and 108 arcs
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Petri net Petri analyzed
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): There are no safe places
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading Petri net took 0.010 real 0.000 user 0.000 sys
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/1923/ltl_2_
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/1923/ltl_2_
pnml2lts-mc( 3/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/1923/ltl_2_
pnml2lts-mc( 2/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/1923/ltl_2_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): buchi has 7 states
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): There are 31 state labels and 1 edge labels
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): State length is 31, there are 93 groups
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Running ufscc using 4 cores
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Using a tree table with 2^25 elements
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Successor permutation: dynamic
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Global bits: 0, count bits: 0, local bits: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 3/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 3/ 4): Accepting cycle FOUND at depth ~363!
pnml2lts-mc( 3/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): total scc count: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): unique states count: 1364
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): unique transitions count: 9827
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - self-loop count: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim dead count: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim found count: 3
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim success count: 1417
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - cum. max stack depth: 1417
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Explored 1417 states 10097 transitions, fanout: 7.126
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Total exploration time 0.050 sec (0.050 sec minimum, 0.050 sec on average)
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): States per second: 28340, Transitions per second: 201940
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Queue width: 12B, total height: 0, memory: 0.00MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Tree memory: 0.2MB, 27.1 B/state, compr.: 21.5%
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Tree fill ratio (roots/leafs): 0.0%/0.0%
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Stored 32 string chucks using 0MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Total memory used for chunk indexing: 0MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Est. total memory use: 0.2MB (~256.0MB paged-in)

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="TCPcondis-PT-50"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="ltsminxred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool ltsminxred"
echo " Input is TCPcondis-PT-50, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r540-smll-171690573500068"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/TCPcondis-PT-50.tgz
mv TCPcondis-PT-50 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;