fond
Model Checking Contest 2024
14th edition, Geneva, Switzerland, June 25, 2024
Execution of r540-smll-171690573500059
Last Updated
July 7, 2024

About the Execution of LTSMin+red for TCPcondis-PT-40

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
434.104 84373.00 114089.00 781.80 FFFFFFFFFFFFTTTF normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r540-smll-171690573500059.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool ltsminxred
Input is TCPcondis-PT-40, examination is LTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r540-smll-171690573500059
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 528K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.0K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 68K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.9K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 57K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 23 08:02 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K Apr 23 08:02 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.0K May 19 07:37 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 19 19:28 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K Apr 12 03:02 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 131K Apr 12 03:02 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K Apr 12 03:02 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 111K Apr 12 03:02 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 23 08:02 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 23 08:02 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rwxr-xr-x 1 mcc users 24K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-00
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-01
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-02
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-03
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-04
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-05
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-06
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-07
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-08
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-09
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1717229859455

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=ltsminxred
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=TCPcondis-PT-40
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Applying reductions before tool ltsmin
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-06-01 08:17:42] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLCardinality, -timeout, 360, -rebuildPNML]
[2024-06-01 08:17:42] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-06-01 08:17:42] [WARNING] Skipping unknown tool specific annotation : Tina
[2024-06-01 08:17:42] [WARNING] Unknown XML tag in source file: size
[2024-06-01 08:17:42] [WARNING] Unknown XML tag in source file: color
[2024-06-01 08:17:42] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 102 ms
[2024-06-01 08:17:42] [INFO ] Transformed 30 places.
[2024-06-01 08:17:42] [INFO ] Transformed 32 transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:17:42] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 30 places and 32 transitions and 108 arcs in 333 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLCardinality.xml in 32 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 26 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 22 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2024-06-01 08:17:42] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 22 ms
[2024-06-01 08:17:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 324 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:17:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:17:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 137 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 526 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:17:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 1152 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 841 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2083ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2110ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2718 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Support contains 26 out of 30 places after structural reductions.
[2024-06-01 08:17:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2024-06-01 08:17:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2024-06-01 08:17:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 33114 steps (6 resets) in 469 ms. (70 steps per ms) remains 0/30 properties
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((p0||G(p1))))'
Support contains 3 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 26 transition count 28
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 25 transition count 27
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 25 transition count 27
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 25 transition count 25
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 25 transition count 23
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 23 transition count 23
Applied a total of 16 rules in 53 ms. Remains 23 /30 variables (removed 7) and now considering 23/32 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 23 rows 23 cols
[2024-06-01 08:17:46] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-06-01 08:17:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:17:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:17:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 159 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 08:17:47] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 21 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:17:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 23/46 variables, 23/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/46 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 46/46 variables, and 32 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 345 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 23/46 variables, 23/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 21/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/46 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 46/46 variables, and 53 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 473 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 858ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 860ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 23/30 places, 23/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1082 ms. Remains : 23/30 places, 23/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 298 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-00
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5448 reset in 645 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 1541 steps with 90 reset with depth 39 and stack size 39 in 6 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-00 finished in 2147 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(G(p0))))'
Support contains 3 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2024-06-01 08:17:48] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-01 08:17:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:17:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:17:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 138 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:17:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 748 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 858 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1636ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1647ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1787 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 180 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-01
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-01 finished in 1990 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G((p0||F((F(p0)&&(p1||G(p2))))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:17:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:17:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:17:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:17:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 85 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 157 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:17:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 688 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 769 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1476ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1478ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1640 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 379 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (NOT p0), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-03
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 689 reset in 641 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 664 reset in 502 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (OR (AND (NOT p0) p1) (AND (NOT p0) p2))), (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p0) p1) (AND (NOT p0) p2)))), (X p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (OR (AND (NOT p0) p1) (AND (NOT p0) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p0) p1) (AND (NOT p0) p2))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)))))]
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 12 factoid took 732 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 15 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 14 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 316 ms :[(NOT p0), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (NOT p0), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
RANDOM walk for 4149 steps (0 resets) in 16 ms. (244 steps per ms) remains 0/12 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (OR (AND (NOT p0) p1) (AND (NOT p0) p2))), (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p0) p1) (AND (NOT p0) p2)))), (X p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (OR (AND (NOT p0) p1) (AND (NOT p0) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p0) p1) (AND (NOT p0) p2))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2))))), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p2) p1))), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p0) p2) (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1))), (F (NOT (OR p2 p1))), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (OR p0 p2 p1))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p2) p1))), (F p2), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT p1))]
Knowledge based reduction with 12 factoid took 1576 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 14 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 5 states, 14 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 292 ms :[(NOT p0), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (NOT p0), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 306 ms :[(NOT p0), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (NOT p0), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
[2024-06-01 08:17:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:17:57] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 08:17:57] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned unsat
Proved EG (NOT p0)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (OR (AND (NOT p0) p1) (AND (NOT p0) p2))), (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p0) p1) (AND (NOT p0) p2)))), (X p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (OR (AND (NOT p0) p1) (AND (NOT p0) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p0) p1) (AND (NOT p0) p2))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2))))), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p2) p1))), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p0) p2) (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1))), (F (NOT (OR p2 p1))), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (OR p0 p2 p1))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p2) p1))), (F p2), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT p1)), (G (NOT p0))]
Property proved to be false thanks to negative knowledge :(G (NOT p0))
Knowledge based reduction with 12 factoid took 1644 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 14 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-03 finished in 8239 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G((p0&&(p1||X(p2))))))'
Support contains 5 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:17:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:17:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:17:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:17:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 128 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:17:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 817 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 766 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1602ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1604ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1734 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 110 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-04
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 505 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 640 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 p0 (NOT p2)), (X (AND p1 p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0 p2))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0 (NOT p2)))), (X p1), (X (X (AND p1 p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0 p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0 (NOT p2))))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X p2), (X (NOT p2)), (X (AND p1 p0 p2)), (X (NOT (AND p1 p0 p2))), (X (OR (AND p1 (NOT p2)) (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (OR (AND p1 (NOT p2)) (NOT p0)))), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (AND p1 p0 p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p0 p2)))), (X (X (OR (AND p1 (NOT p2)) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND p1 (NOT p2)) (NOT p0)))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 13 factoid took 783 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 7 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 2 states, 7 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 122 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))]
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 9 to 8
RANDOM walk for 22569 steps (4 resets) in 67 ms. (331 steps per ms) remains 0/8 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 p0 (NOT p2)), (X (AND p1 p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0 p2))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0 (NOT p2)))), (X p1), (X (X (AND p1 p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0 p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0 (NOT p2))))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X p2), (X (NOT p2)), (X (AND p1 p0 p2)), (X (NOT (AND p1 p0 p2))), (X (OR (AND p1 (NOT p2)) (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (OR (AND p1 (NOT p2)) (NOT p0)))), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (AND p1 p0 p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p0 p2)))), (X (X (OR (AND p1 (NOT p2)) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND p1 (NOT p2)) (NOT p0))))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (AND p1 (NOT p2))))), (F (NOT (AND p0 p1))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1 p2))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1))), (F p2), (F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 13 factoid took 1321 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 7 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 2 states, 7 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 139 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 120 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))]
Support contains 5 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:18:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:18:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:18:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:18:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 142 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:18:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 771 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 674 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1460ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1462ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1606 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) p2))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (AND p0 p1)), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (AND p0 p1))), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (AND p0 p1 p2)), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 p2))), (X p2), (X (NOT p2)), (X (OR (NOT p0) (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (AND p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (AND p0 p1 p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 p2)))), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (OR (NOT p0) (AND p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (AND p1 (NOT p2))))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 13 factoid took 749 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 7 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 2 states, 7 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 137 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))]
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 9 to 8
RANDOM walk for 40063 steps (8 resets) in 54 ms. (728 steps per ms) remains 1/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 272 steps (0 resets) in 6 ms. (38 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) p2))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (AND p0 p1)), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (AND p0 p1))), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (AND p0 p1 p2)), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 p2))), (X p2), (X (NOT p2)), (X (OR (NOT p0) (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (AND p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (AND p0 p1 p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 p2)))), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (OR (NOT p0) (AND p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (AND p1 (NOT p2)))))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (AND p1 (NOT p2))))), (F (NOT (AND p0 p1))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1 p2))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1))), (F p2), (F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 13 factoid took 1536 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 7 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 2 states, 7 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 120 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 123 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 123 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 509 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 575 ms.
Support contains 5 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:18:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:18:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:18:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:18:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 93 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 145 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:18:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 777 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 710 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1503ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1505ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1651 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-04 finished in 13222 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((X(F(p0))||G(p1))))'
Support contains 4 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:18:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:18:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:18:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:18:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 90 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 152 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:18:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 796 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 688 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1511ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1514ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1667 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 204 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-06
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1014 reset in 333 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 923 reset in 369 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1), (X p1), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 6 factoid took 134 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 210 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 9393 steps (1 resets) in 23 ms. (391 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1), (X p1), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p1)), (F p0), (F (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (F (NOT (OR p1 p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 6 factoid took 307 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 209 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 198 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Support contains 4 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:18:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:18:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:18:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:18:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 99 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 174 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:18:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 761 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 722 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1518ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1520ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1698 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 122 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 198 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 6934 steps (1 resets) in 10 ms. (630 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p1)), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 281 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 203 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 353 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 205 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1024 reset in 340 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 988 reset in 347 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, true, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 159 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Support contains 4 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 30 transition count 32
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 29 transition count 31
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 29 transition count 31
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 29 transition count 29
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 29 transition count 31
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 29 transition count 31
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 9 rules in 9 ms. Remains 29 /30 variables (removed 1) and now considering 31/32 (removed 1) transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:18:20] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 29 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 31 rows 29 cols
[2024-06-01 08:18:20] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Problem TDEAD2 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD9 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD13 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD14 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD19 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 31/60 variables, 29/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/60 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 22 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 60/60 variables, and 38 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 22 unsolved in 397 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 29/29 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 7 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/29 variables, 2/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 3/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 31/60 variables, 29/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 22/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/60 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 22 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 60/60 variables, and 60 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 22 unsolved in 524 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 29/29 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 22/29 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 933ms problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 22 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 7 dead transitions in 935ms
Found 7 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 7 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 7 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 29/30 places, 24/32 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 63 edges and 29 vertex of which 24 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 5 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 5 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 8 ms. Remains 24 /29 variables (removed 5) and now considering 24/24 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 24/30 places, 24/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 965 ms. Remains : 24/30 places, 24/32 transitions.
Support contains 4 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2024-06-01 08:18:21] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-01 08:18:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:18:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:18:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 89 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 169 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:18:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 758 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 657 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1427ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1428ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1599 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-06 finished in 10458 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((p0&&X(X((p1&&F(G(!p0))))))))'
Support contains 2 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:18:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:18:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:18:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:18:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 100 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 157 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:18:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 685 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 728 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1425ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1426ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1585 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 265 ms :[true, (OR (NOT p1) p0), (OR (NOT p1) p0), (OR (NOT p1) p0), p0]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-07
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 416 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 352 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 6 factoid took 114 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 12 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 12 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 234 ms :[true, (OR (NOT p1) p0), (OR (NOT p1) p0), (OR (NOT p1) p0), p0]
RANDOM walk for 1315 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (263 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p1), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR p1 (NOT p0)))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 6 factoid took 288 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 12 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 12 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 265 ms :[true, (OR (NOT p1) p0), (OR (NOT p1) p0), (OR (NOT p1) p0), p0]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 265 ms :[true, (OR (NOT p1) p0), (OR (NOT p1) p0), (OR (NOT p1) p0), p0]
[2024-06-01 08:18:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Proved EG true
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p1), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR p1 (NOT p0)))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), true]
Knowledge based reduction with 6 factoid took 321 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 12 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 12 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 263 ms :[true, (OR (NOT p1) p0), (OR (NOT p1) p0), (OR (NOT p1) p0), p0]
Support contains 2 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:18:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:18:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:18:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:18:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 138 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:18:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 754 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 707 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1482ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1483ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1622 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 6 factoid took 129 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 12 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 12 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 261 ms :[true, (OR (NOT p1) p0), (OR (NOT p1) p0), (OR (NOT p1) p0), p0]
RANDOM walk for 1399 steps (0 resets) in 7 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p1), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR p1 (NOT p0)))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 6 factoid took 286 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 12 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 12 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 259 ms :[true, (OR (NOT p1) p0), (OR (NOT p1) p0), (OR (NOT p1) p0), p0]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 257 ms :[true, (OR (NOT p1) p0), (OR (NOT p1) p0), (OR (NOT p1) p0), p0]
[2024-06-01 08:18:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Proved EG true
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p1), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR p1 (NOT p0)))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), true]
Knowledge based reduction with 6 factoid took 319 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 12 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 12 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 257 ms :[true, (OR (NOT p1) p0), (OR (NOT p1) p0), (OR (NOT p1) p0), p0]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 257 ms :[true, (OR (NOT p1) p0), (OR (NOT p1) p0), (OR (NOT p1) p0), p0]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 405 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 522 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [false, false, false, false, true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 267 ms :[true, (OR (NOT p1) p0), (OR (NOT p1) p0), (OR (NOT p1) p0), p0]
Support contains 2 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 30 transition count 32
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 29 transition count 31
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 29 transition count 31
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 29 transition count 29
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 29 transition count 30
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 29 transition count 30
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 8 rules in 12 ms. Remains 29 /30 variables (removed 1) and now considering 30/32 (removed 2) transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:18:32] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 30 rows 29 cols
[2024-06-01 08:18:32] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 5/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD16 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD17 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD21 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/59 variables, 29/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/59 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 59/59 variables, and 38 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 5 solved, 23 unsolved in 574 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 29/29 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 5 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/27 variables, 2/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 2/29 variables, 3/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 30/59 variables, 29/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 23/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/59 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 59/59 variables, and 61 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 5 solved, 23 unsolved in 619 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 29/29 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1207ms problems are : Problem set: 5 solved, 23 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 5 dead transitions in 1209ms
Found 5 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 5 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 5 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 29/30 places, 25/32 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 65 edges and 29 vertex of which 25 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 4 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 4 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 3 ms. Remains 25 /29 variables (removed 4) and now considering 25/25 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 25/30 places, 25/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 1233 ms. Remains : 25/30 places, 25/32 transitions.
Support contains 2 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2024-06-01 08:18:33] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 08:18:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:18:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:18:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 130 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:18:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 572 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 704 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1287ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1288ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1420 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-07 finished in 12407 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(G((X(G(p1))&&p0)))))'
Support contains 5 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:18:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:18:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:18:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:18:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 77 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 150 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:18:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 779 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 560 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1350ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1351ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1502 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 217 ms :[true, (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-08
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-08 finished in 1742 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(p0))'
Support contains 1 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 26 transition count 28
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 24 transition count 26
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 24 transition count 26
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 24 transition count 24
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 24 transition count 22
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 22 transition count 22
Applied a total of 18 rules in 10 ms. Remains 22 /30 variables (removed 8) and now considering 22/32 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 22 rows 22 cols
[2024-06-01 08:18:36] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-01 08:18:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:18:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:18:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 128 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 08:18:37] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 20 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:18:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 22/44 variables, 22/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/44 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 44/44 variables, and 31 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved in 329 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 22/44 variables, 22/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 20/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/44 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 44/44 variables, and 51 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved in 386 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 742ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 744ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 22/30 places, 22/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 890 ms. Remains : 22/30 places, 22/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 49 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-09
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2484 reset in 544 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 1653 steps with 41 reset with depth 25 and stack size 25 in 12 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-09 finished in 1514 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((p0 U X((X(p1)||(p1&&F(p2))))) U !p1))'
Support contains 3 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2024-06-01 08:18:38] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-01 08:18:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:18:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:18:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 85 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 141 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:18:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 791 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 753 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1556ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1557ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1700 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 540 ms :[p1, (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), true, (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-10
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 24968 reset in 168 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25050 reset in 189 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (X (AND p1 (NOT p2))), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (AND p1 p0)), (X (NOT (AND p1 p0))), (X (AND p1 p0 (NOT p2))), (X (NOT (AND p1 p0 (NOT p2)))), (X (AND p1 (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (AND p1 p0 (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p0 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (AND p1 p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p0)))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 14 factoid took 1243 ms. Reduced automaton from 11 states, 19 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 11 states, 19 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 538 ms :[p1, (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), true, (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2)]
RANDOM walk for 26250 steps (5 resets) in 36 ms. (709 steps per ms) remains 0/13 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (X (AND p1 (NOT p2))), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (AND p1 p0)), (X (NOT (AND p1 p0))), (X (AND p1 p0 (NOT p2))), (X (NOT (AND p1 p0 (NOT p2)))), (X (AND p1 (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (AND p1 p0 (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p0 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (AND p1 p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p0)))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (NOT (OR p1 p0))), (F (NOT (OR p1 p2 (NOT p0)))), (F (NOT (OR p1 (NOT p0)))), (F (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (OR p1 p2))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p0)))), (F p2), (F (NOT (OR p1 p2 p0))), (F (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (F p0), (F (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 14 factoid took 1881 ms. Reduced automaton from 11 states, 19 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 11 states, 19 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 540 ms :[p1, (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), true, (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 525 ms :[p1, (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), true, (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2)]
[2024-06-01 08:18:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:18:45] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 08:18:45] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned unsat
Proved EG p1
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (X (AND p1 (NOT p2))), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (AND p1 p0)), (X (NOT (AND p1 p0))), (X (AND p1 p0 (NOT p2))), (X (NOT (AND p1 p0 (NOT p2)))), (X (AND p1 (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (AND p1 p0 (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p0 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (AND p1 p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p0)))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (NOT (OR p1 p0))), (F (NOT (OR p1 p2 (NOT p0)))), (F (NOT (OR p1 (NOT p0)))), (F (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (OR p1 p2))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p0)))), (F p2), (F (NOT (OR p1 p2 p0))), (F (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (F p0), (F (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (G p1)]
Property proved to be false thanks to negative knowledge :(G p1)
Knowledge based reduction with 14 factoid took 1929 ms. Reduced automaton from 11 states, 19 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-10 finished in 9431 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(((p0&&(F(p1) U p2))||((F(p1) U p2)&&G(p3))))))'
Support contains 6 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 29 transition count 31
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 28 transition count 30
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 28 transition count 30
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 28 transition count 28
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 28 transition count 27
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 27 transition count 27
Applied a total of 8 rules in 16 ms. Remains 27 /30 variables (removed 3) and now considering 27/32 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 27 rows 27 cols
[2024-06-01 08:18:47] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 08:18:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 107 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:18:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:18:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 82 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 192 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 08:18:48] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 25 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:18:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/27 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 3/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 27/54 variables, 27/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/54 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 54/54 variables, and 36 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved in 551 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 27/27 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/27 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 3/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 27/54 variables, 27/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 25/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/54 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 54/54 variables, and 61 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved in 568 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 27/27 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1129ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1130ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 27/30 places, 27/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1346 ms. Remains : 27/30 places, 27/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 571 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), (OR (NOT p2) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (NOT p2), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3))]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-11
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 844 reset in 330 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 1036 steps with 11 reset with depth 19 and stack size 19 in 3 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-11 finished in 2285 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X((G(F(p0))||(F(p0) U p1)))))'
Support contains 4 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2024-06-01 08:18:50] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 08:18:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:18:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:18:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 137 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:18:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 787 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 730 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1529ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1529ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1668 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 206 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-12
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 103 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 114 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 p0), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 19 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-12 finished in 2142 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((X(p0)||(!p0 U (!p1||X(G(p0))))))'
Support contains 4 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:18:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:18:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:18:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:18:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 133 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:18:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 772 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 723 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1506ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1508ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1642 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 285 ms :[(NOT p0), true, (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-13
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 116 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 133 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X p0), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0))))), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X p1), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (AND p1 p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p0)))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 51 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 9 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-13 finished in 2256 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G((F(p0)&&(p1||G(F(p2)))))))'
Support contains 4 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:18:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:18:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:18:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:18:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 122 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:18:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 699 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 713 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1424ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1425ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1549 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 273 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (NOT p0), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-15
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 372 reset in 394 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 427 reset in 423 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)), (X (NOT p2)), (X p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 10 factoid took 171 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 9 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 8 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 184 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (NOT p0), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) p1)]
RANDOM walk for 8177 steps (1 resets) in 9 ms. (817 steps per ms) remains 0/5 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)), (X (NOT p2)), (X p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (OR p2 p1))), (F p2), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1))), (F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 10 factoid took 373 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 8 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 4 states, 8 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 210 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (NOT p0), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 211 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (NOT p0), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) p1)]
Support contains 4 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 26 transition count 28
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 24 transition count 26
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 24 transition count 26
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 24 transition count 24
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 24 transition count 22
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 22 transition count 22
Applied a total of 18 rules in 10 ms. Remains 22 /30 variables (removed 8) and now considering 22/32 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 22 rows 22 cols
[2024-06-01 08:18:58] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 08:18:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:18:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:18:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 64 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 118 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 08:18:58] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 20 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:18:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 22/44 variables, 22/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/44 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 44/44 variables, and 31 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved in 299 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 22/44 variables, 22/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 20/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/44 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 44/44 variables, and 51 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved in 404 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 712ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 713ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 22/30 places, 22/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 851 ms. Remains : 22/30 places, 22/32 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p2) p1), (X p0), (X (AND (NOT p2) p1)), (X (NOT p2)), (X p1), (X (X p0)), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) p1))), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 162 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 8 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 4 states, 8 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 262 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (NOT p0), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) p1)]
RANDOM walk for 4060 steps (0 resets) in 7 ms. (507 steps per ms) remains 0/5 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p2) p1), (X p0), (X (AND (NOT p2) p1)), (X (NOT p2)), (X p1), (X (X p0)), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) p1))), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (OR p1 p2))), (F p2), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 386 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 8 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 4 states, 8 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 207 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (NOT p0), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 176 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (NOT p0), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 194 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (NOT p0), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) p1)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 470 reset in 189 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 4599 steps with 26 reset with depth 82 and stack size 82 in 10 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-15 finished in 6347 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G((p0&&(p1||X(p2))))))'
Found a Lengthening insensitive property : TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-04
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 83 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))]
Support contains 5 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 26 transition count 28
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 24 transition count 26
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 24 transition count 26
Applied a total of 12 rules in 4 ms. Remains 24 /30 variables (removed 6) and now considering 26/32 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 26 rows 24 cols
[2024-06-01 08:19:01] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 08:19:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:19:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:19:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 58 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 94 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 22 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:19:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/24 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 3/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 26/50 variables, 24/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/50 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 50/50 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved in 450 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/24 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 3/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 26/50 variables, 24/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 22/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/50 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 50/50 variables, and 55 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved in 472 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 931ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 932ms
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 24/30 places, 26/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1030 ms. Remains : 24/30 places, 26/32 transitions.
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-04
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 436 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 12230 steps with 0 reset with depth 12231 and stack size 1313 in 73 ms.
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-04 finished in 1832 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES LENGTHENING_INSENSITIVE
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((X(F(p0))||G(p1))))'
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((p0&&X(X((p1&&F(G(!p0))))))))'
[2024-06-01 08:19:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-06-01 08:19:03] [INFO ] Export to MCC of 3 properties in file /home/mcc/execution/LTLCardinality.sr.xml took 4 ms.
[2024-06-01 08:19:03] [INFO ] Export to PNML in file /home/mcc/execution/model.sr.pnml of net with 30 places, 32 transitions and 108 arcs took 6 ms.
Total runtime 81119 ms.
There are residual formulas that ITS could not solve within timeout
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT PARALLEL_PROCESSING USE_NUPN
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT PARALLEL_PROCESSING USE_NUPN
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT PARALLEL_PROCESSING USE_NUPN

BK_STOP 1717229943828

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLCardinality -timeout 360 -rebuildPNML
mcc2024
ltl formula name TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-04
ltl formula formula --ltl=/tmp/2502/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading model from model.pnml
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Edge label is id
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Petri net has 30 places, 32 transitions and 108 arcs
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Petri net Petri analyzed
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): There are no safe places
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading Petri net took 0.000 real 0.000 user 0.000 sys
pnml2lts-mc( 2/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/2502/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/2502/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/2502/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 3/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/2502/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): buchi has 3 states
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): There are 31 state labels and 1 edge labels
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): State length is 31, there are 43 groups
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Running ufscc using 4 cores
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Using a tree table with 2^25 elements
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Successor permutation: dynamic
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Global bits: 0, count bits: 0, local bits: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4): Accepting cycle FOUND at depth ~93!
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): total scc count: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): unique states count: 311
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): unique transitions count: 1373
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - self-loop count: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim dead count: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim found count: 1
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim success count: 323
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - cum. max stack depth: 323
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Explored 323 states 1434 transitions, fanout: 4.440
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Total exploration time 0.010 sec (0.010 sec minimum, 0.010 sec on average)
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): States per second: 32300, Transitions per second: 143400
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Queue width: 12B, total height: 0, memory: 0.00MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Tree memory: 0.0MB, 28.3 B/state, compr.: 22.4%
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Tree fill ratio (roots/leafs): 0.0%/0.0%
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Stored 32 string chucks using 0MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Total memory used for chunk indexing: 0MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Est. total memory use: 0.0MB (~256.0MB paged-in)
ltl formula name TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-06
ltl formula formula --ltl=/tmp/2502/ltl_1_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading model from model.pnml
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Edge label is id
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Petri net has 30 places, 32 transitions and 108 arcs
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Petri net Petri analyzed
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): There are no safe places
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading Petri net took 0.010 real 0.000 user 0.000 sys
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/2502/ltl_1_
pnml2lts-mc( 2/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/2502/ltl_1_
pnml2lts-mc( 3/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/2502/ltl_1_
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/2502/ltl_1_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): buchi has 4 states
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Weak Buchi automaton detected, adding non-accepting as progress label.
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): There are 32 state labels and 1 edge labels
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): State length is 31, there are 38 groups
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Running ufscc using 4 cores
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Using a tree table with 2^25 elements
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Successor permutation: dynamic
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Global bits: 0, count bits: 0, local bits: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 3/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 3/ 4): Accepting cycle FOUND at depth ~370!
pnml2lts-mc( 3/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): total scc count: 14
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): unique states count: 1332
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): unique transitions count: 5734
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - self-loop count: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim dead count: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim found count: 11
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim success count: 1338
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - cum. max stack depth: 1324
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Explored 1338 states 5763 transitions, fanout: 4.307
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Total exploration time 0.060 sec (0.060 sec minimum, 0.060 sec on average)
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): States per second: 22300, Transitions per second: 96050
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Queue width: 12B, total height: 0, memory: 0.00MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Tree memory: 0.1MB, 31.0 B/state, compr.: 24.6%
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Tree fill ratio (roots/leafs): 0.0%/0.0%
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Stored 32 string chucks using 0MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Total memory used for chunk indexing: 0MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Est. total memory use: 0.1MB (~256.0MB paged-in)
ltl formula name TCPcondis-PT-40-LTLCardinality-07
ltl formula formula --ltl=/tmp/2502/ltl_2_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading model from model.pnml
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Edge label is id
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Petri net has 30 places, 32 transitions and 108 arcs
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Petri net Petri analyzed
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): There are no safe places
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading Petri net took 0.010 real 0.000 user 0.000 sys
pnml2lts-mc( 2/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/2502/ltl_2_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/2502/ltl_2_
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/2502/ltl_2_
pnml2lts-mc( 3/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/2502/ltl_2_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): buchi has 6 states
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): There are 31 state labels and 1 edge labels
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): State length is 31, there are 46 groups
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Running ufscc using 4 cores
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Using a tree table with 2^25 elements
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Successor permutation: dynamic
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Global bits: 0, count bits: 0, local bits: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 2/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 2/ 4): Accepting cycle FOUND at depth ~254!
pnml2lts-mc( 2/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): total scc count: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): unique states count: 1133
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): unique transitions count: 5620
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - self-loop count: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim dead count: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim found count: 1
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim success count: 1140
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - cum. max stack depth: 1140
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Explored 1140 states 5656 transitions, fanout: 4.961
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Total exploration time 0.050 sec (0.050 sec minimum, 0.050 sec on average)
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): States per second: 22800, Transitions per second: 113120
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Queue width: 12B, total height: 0, memory: 0.00MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Tree memory: 0.1MB, 27.2 B/state, compr.: 21.6%
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Tree fill ratio (roots/leafs): 0.0%/0.0%
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Stored 32 string chucks using 0MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Total memory used for chunk indexing: 0MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Est. total memory use: 0.1MB (~256.0MB paged-in)

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="TCPcondis-PT-40"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="ltsminxred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool ltsminxred"
echo " Input is TCPcondis-PT-40, examination is LTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r540-smll-171690573500059"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/TCPcondis-PT-40.tgz
mv TCPcondis-PT-40 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;