About the Execution of LTSMin+red for TCPcondis-PT-15
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
379.584 | 28622.00 | 50732.00 | 359.90 | FFFFFFTFFFTFFFFF | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r540-smll-171690573400020.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool ltsminxred
Input is TCPcondis-PT-15, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r540-smll-171690573400020
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 520K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 61K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.0K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 43K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 23 08:02 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K Apr 23 08:02 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Apr 23 08:02 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 23 08:02 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 12 03:07 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 173K Apr 12 03:07 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.3K Apr 12 03:06 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 71K Apr 12 03:06 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 23 08:02 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 23 08:02 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rwxr-xr-x 1 mcc users 24K May 18 16:43 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1717229205740
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=ltsminxred
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=TCPcondis-PT-15
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Applying reductions before tool ltsmin
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-06-01 08:06:48] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -timeout, 360, -rebuildPNML]
[2024-06-01 08:06:48] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-06-01 08:06:48] [WARNING] Skipping unknown tool specific annotation : Tina
[2024-06-01 08:06:48] [WARNING] Unknown XML tag in source file: size
[2024-06-01 08:06:48] [WARNING] Unknown XML tag in source file: color
[2024-06-01 08:06:48] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 101 ms
[2024-06-01 08:06:48] [INFO ] Transformed 30 places.
[2024-06-01 08:06:48] [INFO ] Transformed 32 transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:06:48] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 30 places and 32 transitions and 108 arcs in 324 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 28 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 4 formulas.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 20 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 137 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2024-06-01 08:06:49] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 12 ms
[2024-06-01 08:06:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 276 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:06:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:06:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 111 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 489 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:06:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 1114 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 800 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2002ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2026ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2701 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Support contains 20 out of 30 places after structural reductions.
[2024-06-01 08:06:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
[2024-06-01 08:06:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-06-01 08:06:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 16 to 15
RANDOM walk for 3659 steps (0 resets) in 104 ms. (34 steps per ms) remains 0/15 properties
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F((!(p0 U p1)||!p0))))'
Support contains 2 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 28 transition count 30
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 28 transition count 28
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 28 transition count 27
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 27 transition count 27
Applied a total of 8 rules in 39 ms. Remains 27 /30 variables (removed 3) and now considering 27/32 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 27 rows 27 cols
[2024-06-01 08:06:52] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-01 08:06:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:06:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:06:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 109 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 187 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 08:06:52] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 25 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:06:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/27 variables, 2/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 4/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 27/54 variables, 27/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/54 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 54/54 variables, and 36 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved in 558 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 27/27 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/27 variables, 2/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 4/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 27/54 variables, 27/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 25/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/54 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 54/54 variables, and 61 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved in 565 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 27/27 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1148ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1150ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 27/30 places, 27/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1385 ms. Remains : 27/30 places, 27/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 341 ms :[(AND p0 p1), (AND p0 p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-01
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 151 reset in 760 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 12298 steps with 17 reset with depth 263 and stack size 263 in 158 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-01 finished in 2744 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X((F(p0)&&G(p1)))))'
Support contains 3 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2024-06-01 08:06:55] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 8 ms
[2024-06-01 08:06:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:06:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:06:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 71 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 146 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:06:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 716 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 766 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1499ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1501ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1648 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 281 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), true, (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-02
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 16 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-02 finished in 1959 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((F(p0)&&G(F(p1)))))'
Support contains 3 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:06:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:06:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:06:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:06:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 98 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 177 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:06:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 779 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 775 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1576ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1578ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1758 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 279 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-03
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1765 reset in 359 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1718 reset in 604 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 95 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 8 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 73 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 1720 steps (0 resets) in 14 ms. (114 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p1))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 122 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 74 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 87 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Support contains 2 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 27 transition count 29
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 26 transition count 28
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 26 transition count 28
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 26 transition count 26
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 26 transition count 24
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 24 transition count 24
Applied a total of 14 rules in 16 ms. Remains 24 /30 variables (removed 6) and now considering 24/32 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 24 rows 24 cols
[2024-06-01 08:07:00] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-01 08:07:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:07:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:07:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 79 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 137 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 08:07:01] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 22 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:07:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 24/48 variables, 24/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/48 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 48/48 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved in 343 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 24/48 variables, 24/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 22/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/48 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 48/48 variables, and 55 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved in 465 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 823ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 824ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 24/30 places, 24/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 985 ms. Remains : 24/30 places, 24/32 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p1, (X p1), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 114 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 99 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 1317 steps (0 resets) in 7 ms. (164 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p1, (X p1), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p1))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 173 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 97 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 74 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 75 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2307 reset in 169 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 68963 steps with 1602 reset with depth 51 and stack size 51 in 305 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-03 finished in 5673 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((X(X(p0))&&F((p1||X(F((p1&&F(p2)))))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2024-06-01 08:07:03] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-01 08:07:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:07:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:07:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 77 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 150 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:07:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 556 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 496 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1068ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1069ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1221 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 271 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1), (NOT p0), true]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-07
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 64 steps with 3 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-07 finished in 1524 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G((F(G(p1))&&p0))))'
Support contains 3 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:07:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:07:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:07:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:07:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 133 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:07:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 734 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 696 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1442ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1444ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1579 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 189 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), true, (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-08
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-08 finished in 1789 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((G(p0)&&(F(p1)||G(F(!p0))||(F(!p0)&&F(!p2))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 27 transition count 29
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 26 transition count 28
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 26 transition count 28
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 26 transition count 27
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 26 transition count 26
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 25 transition count 26
Applied a total of 11 rules in 9 ms. Remains 25 /30 variables (removed 5) and now considering 26/32 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 26 rows 25 cols
[2024-06-01 08:07:06] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 08:07:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:07:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:07:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 144 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 08:07:06] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 23 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:07:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 4/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/25 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 26/51 variables, 25/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 51/51 variables, and 34 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 466 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 4/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/25 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 26/51 variables, 25/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 23/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 51/51 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 514 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 994ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 996ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 25/30 places, 26/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1157 ms. Remains : 25/30 places, 26/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 299 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (AND p0 (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p1) p2 p0), (AND p0 (NOT p1) p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-09
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1892 reset in 341 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 54530 steps with 1017 reset with depth 15 and stack size 15 in 207 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-09 finished in 2031 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(G((X(p1)&&p0)))))'
Support contains 5 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2024-06-01 08:07:08] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 08:07:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:07:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:07:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 64 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 101 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:07:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 490 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 616 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1115ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1115ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1218 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 221 ms :[true, (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-11
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-11 finished in 1460 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((G(p0)||G(F(p1)))))'
Support contains 2 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 27 transition count 29
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 26 transition count 28
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 26 transition count 28
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 26 transition count 27
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 26 transition count 26
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 25 transition count 26
Applied a total of 11 rules in 10 ms. Remains 25 /30 variables (removed 5) and now considering 26/32 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 26 rows 25 cols
[2024-06-01 08:07:09] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 08:07:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:07:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:07:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 119 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 08:07:09] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 23 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:07:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/25 variables, 2/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 4/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 26/51 variables, 25/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 51/51 variables, and 34 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 380 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/25 variables, 2/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 4/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 26/51 variables, 25/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 23/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 51/51 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 529 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 919ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 920ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 25/30 places, 26/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1057 ms. Remains : 25/30 places, 26/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 106 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-12
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 7809 reset in 270 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 26839 steps with 2352 reset with depth 15 and stack size 15 in 78 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-12 finished in 1528 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(p0))'
Support contains 2 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 27 transition count 29
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 25 transition count 27
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 25 transition count 27
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 25 transition count 25
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 25 transition count 23
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 23 transition count 23
Applied a total of 16 rules in 7 ms. Remains 23 /30 variables (removed 7) and now considering 23/32 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 23 rows 23 cols
[2024-06-01 08:07:11] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 08:07:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:07:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:07:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 51 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 86 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 08:07:11] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 21 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:07:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 23/46 variables, 23/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/46 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 46/46 variables, and 32 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 252 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 23/46 variables, 23/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 21/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/46 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 46/46 variables, and 53 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 294 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 553ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 554ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 23/30 places, 23/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 652 ms. Remains : 23/30 places, 23/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 35 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-13
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1853 reset in 314 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 35 steps with 0 reset with depth 36 and stack size 36 in 0 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-13 finished in 1016 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 3 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 28 transition count 30
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 26 transition count 28
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 26 transition count 28
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 26 transition count 26
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 26 transition count 24
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 24 transition count 24
Applied a total of 14 rules in 7 ms. Remains 24 /30 variables (removed 6) and now considering 24/32 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 24 rows 24 cols
[2024-06-01 08:07:12] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 08:07:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:07:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:07:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 47 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 102 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 08:07:12] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 22 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:07:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 24/48 variables, 24/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/48 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 48/48 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved in 260 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 24/48 variables, 24/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 22/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/48 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 48/48 variables, and 55 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved in 293 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 559ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 559ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 24/30 places, 24/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 681 ms. Remains : 24/30 places, 24/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 36 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-14
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 213 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 28212 steps with 0 reset with depth 28213 and stack size 28210 in 77 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-14 finished in 1022 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 27 transition count 29
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 25 transition count 27
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 25 transition count 27
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 25 transition count 25
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 25 transition count 23
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 23 transition count 23
Applied a total of 16 rules in 6 ms. Remains 23 /30 variables (removed 7) and now considering 23/32 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 23 rows 23 cols
[2024-06-01 08:07:13] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-06-01 08:07:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:07:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:07:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 45 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 90 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 08:07:13] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 21 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:07:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 23/46 variables, 23/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/46 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 46/46 variables, and 32 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 278 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 23/46 variables, 23/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 21/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/46 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 46/46 variables, and 53 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 251 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 536ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 537ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 23/30 places, 23/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 638 ms. Remains : 23/30 places, 23/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 68 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-15
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1896 reset in 173 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 2674 steps with 46 reset with depth 24 and stack size 24 in 6 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-15-LTLFireability-15 finished in 899 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 26033 ms.
ITS solved all properties within timeout
BK_STOP 1717229234362
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -timeout 360 -rebuildPNML
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="TCPcondis-PT-15"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="ltsminxred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool ltsminxred"
echo " Input is TCPcondis-PT-15, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r540-smll-171690573400020"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/TCPcondis-PT-15.tgz
mv TCPcondis-PT-15 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;