Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r540-smll-171690573400012.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool ltsminxred
Input is TCPcondis-PT-10, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r540-smll-171690573400012
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 416K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.1K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 61K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 61K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 23 08:02 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K Apr 23 08:02 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K Apr 23 08:02 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Apr 23 08:02 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.6K Apr 12 03:06 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 82K Apr 12 03:06 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.4K Apr 12 03:05 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 60K Apr 12 03:05 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 23 08:02 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 23 08:02 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rwxr-xr-x 1 mcc users 24K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1717229088044

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=ltsminxred
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=TCPcondis-PT-10
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Applying reductions before tool ltsmin
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-06-01 08:04:50] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -timeout, 360, -rebuildPNML]
[2024-06-01 08:04:50] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-06-01 08:04:50] [WARNING] Skipping unknown tool specific annotation : Tina
[2024-06-01 08:04:50] [WARNING] Unknown XML tag in source file: size
[2024-06-01 08:04:50] [WARNING] Unknown XML tag in source file: color
[2024-06-01 08:04:50] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 102 ms
[2024-06-01 08:04:50] [INFO ] Transformed 30 places.
[2024-06-01 08:04:50] [INFO ] Transformed 32 transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:04:50] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 30 places and 32 transitions and 108 arcs in 336 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 26 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 3 formulas.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 24 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 21 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2024-06-01 08:04:51] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 21 ms
[2024-06-01 08:04:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 306 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:04:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:04:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 132 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 507 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:04:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 1127 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 862 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2071ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2091ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2660 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Support contains 24 out of 30 places after structural reductions.
[2024-06-01 08:04:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2024-06-01 08:04:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2024-06-01 08:04:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
Support contains 23 out of 30 places (down from 24) after GAL structural reductions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 19 to 18
RANDOM walk for 13847 steps (2 resets) in 471 ms. (29 steps per ms) remains 0/18 properties
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X((F(p0)&&F(G(p1))))))'
Support contains 5 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:04:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:04:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 83 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:04:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:04:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 101 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 191 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:04:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 745 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 762 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1540ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1543ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1738 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 625 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-00
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 747 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 45441 steps with 0 reset with depth 45442 and stack size 21649 in 196 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-00 finished in 3434 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(F(p0))))'
Support contains 1 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:04:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:04:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:04:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:04:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 134 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:04:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 688 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 673 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1382ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1383ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1519 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 144 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-03
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 454 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 232 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 16 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-03 finished in 2399 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((p0||X(X(p1)))))'
Support contains 4 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:05:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:05:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:05:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:05:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 53 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 94 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:05:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 507 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 701 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1222ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1223ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1318 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 167 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-04
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 114 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 129 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 18 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-04 finished in 1763 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(p0)||X(F(p1))))'
Support contains 3 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:05:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:05:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:05:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:05:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 93 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 156 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:05:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 778 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 739 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1536ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1538ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1695 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 152 ms :[(NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-06
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 106 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 120 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 22 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-06 finished in 2116 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)&&F(G(p1)))))'
Support contains 4 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 26 transition count 28
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 24 transition count 26
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 24 transition count 26
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 24 transition count 24
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 24 transition count 22
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 22 transition count 22
Applied a total of 18 rules in 43 ms. Remains 22 /30 variables (removed 8) and now considering 22/32 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 22 rows 22 cols
[2024-06-01 08:05:04] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-01 08:05:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:05:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:05:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 63 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 130 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 08:05:04] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 20 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:05:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 22/44 variables, 22/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/44 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 44/44 variables, and 31 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved in 314 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 22/44 variables, 22/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 20/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/44 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 44/44 variables, and 51 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved in 385 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 712ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 713ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 22/30 places, 22/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 894 ms. Remains : 22/30 places, 22/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 154 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-07
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 225 reset in 356 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 86 steps with 8 reset with depth 34 and stack size 34 in 0 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-07 finished in 1427 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((p0 U G(p1))||F(!p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 26 transition count 28
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 24 transition count 26
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 24 transition count 26
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 24 transition count 25
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 24 transition count 24
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 23 transition count 24
Applied a total of 15 rules in 9 ms. Remains 23 /30 variables (removed 7) and now considering 24/32 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 24 rows 23 cols
[2024-06-01 08:05:05] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-01 08:05:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:05:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:05:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 69 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 138 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 08:05:06] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 21 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:05:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 5/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/23 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 24/47 variables, 23/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/47 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 47/47 variables, and 32 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 409 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 5/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/23 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 24/47 variables, 23/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 21/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/47 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 47/47 variables, and 53 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 507 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 931ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 932ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 23/30 places, 24/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1086 ms. Remains : 23/30 places, 24/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 53 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-08
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 7354 reset in 234 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 7487 reset in 262 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) p0), (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (AND (NOT p1) p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X (AND p1 p0)), (X (NOT (AND p1 p0))), (X p1), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X (AND p1 p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p0)))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 507 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 2 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 49 ms :[(AND p0 (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 697 steps (0 resets) in 9 ms. (69 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) p0), (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (AND (NOT p1) p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X (AND p1 p0)), (X (NOT (AND p1 p0))), (X p1), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X (AND p1 p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p0)))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F p1), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 646 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 2 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 50 ms :[(AND p0 (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 59 ms :[(AND p0 (NOT p1))]
[2024-06-01 08:05:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:05:09] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 08:05:09] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 08:05:09] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 15 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 08:05:09] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 21/81/21 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 7 ms.
[2024-06-01 08:05:09] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-06-01 08:05:09] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 08:05:09] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 08:05:09] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 19 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 08:05:09] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 21/81/21 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 5 ms.
[2024-06-01 08:05:09] [INFO ] Added : 19 causal constraints over 5 iterations in 47 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND p0 (NOT p1))
Support contains 2 out of 23 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 23/23 places, 24/24 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 23 /23 variables (removed 0) and now considering 24/24 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:05:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:05:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:05:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:05:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 144 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 08:05:09] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 21 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:05:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 5/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/23 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 24/47 variables, 23/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/47 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 47/47 variables, and 32 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 415 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 5/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/23 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 24/47 variables, 23/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 21/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/47 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 47/47 variables, and 53 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 464 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 893ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 894ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1049 ms. Remains : 23/23 places, 24/24 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (AND p0 p1)), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1))), (X (AND p0 (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X p1), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (AND p0 p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1)))), (X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 516 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 2 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 51 ms :[(AND p0 (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 409 steps (0 resets) in 7 ms. (51 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (AND p0 p1)), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1))), (X (AND p0 (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X p1), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (AND p0 p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1)))), (X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F p1), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 638 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 2 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 51 ms :[(AND p0 (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 51 ms :[(AND p0 (NOT p1))]
[2024-06-01 08:05:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:05:11] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 08:05:11] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 08:05:11] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 19 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 08:05:11] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 21/81/21 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 9 ms.
[2024-06-01 08:05:11] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-06-01 08:05:11] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 08:05:11] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 08:05:11] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 15 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 08:05:11] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 21/81/21 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 3 ms.
[2024-06-01 08:05:11] [INFO ] Added : 19 causal constraints over 5 iterations in 48 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND p0 (NOT p1))
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 64 ms :[(AND p0 (NOT p1))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 7366 reset in 249 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 7357 reset in 271 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 23 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 23/23 places, 24/24 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 23 /23 variables (removed 0) and now considering 24/24 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:05:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:05:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:05:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:05:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 48 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 98 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 08:05:12] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 21 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:05:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 5/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/23 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 24/47 variables, 23/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/47 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 47/47 variables, and 32 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 317 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 5/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/23 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 24/47 variables, 23/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 21/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/47 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 47/47 variables, and 53 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 418 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 748ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 749ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 855 ms. Remains : 23/23 places, 24/24 transitions.
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-08 finished in 7428 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 27 transition count 29
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 25 transition count 27
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 25 transition count 27
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 25 transition count 25
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 25 transition count 23
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 23 transition count 23
Applied a total of 16 rules in 9 ms. Remains 23 /30 variables (removed 7) and now considering 23/32 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 23 rows 23 cols
[2024-06-01 08:05:13] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-06-01 08:05:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:05:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:05:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 68 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 124 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 08:05:13] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 21 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:05:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 23/46 variables, 23/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/46 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 46/46 variables, and 32 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 342 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 23/46 variables, 23/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 21/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/46 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 46/46 variables, and 53 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 379 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 732ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 734ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 23/30 places, 23/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 874 ms. Remains : 23/30 places, 23/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 109 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-10
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2707 reset in 272 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 1680 steps with 42 reset with depth 15 and stack size 15 in 5 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-10 finished in 1281 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(F(!p0))))'
Support contains 1 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2024-06-01 08:05:14] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 08:05:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:05:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:05:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 91 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 160 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:05:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 746 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 743 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1509ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1510ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1672 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 147 ms :[p0, p0, p0]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-13
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 110 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 122 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 24 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-13 finished in 2100 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(p0)||X(X(G((F(p2)||p1))))))'
Support contains 5 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:05:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:05:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:05:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:05:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 132 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:05:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 698 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 788 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1500ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1501ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1634 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 219 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-14
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4489 reset in 163 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4389 reset in 195 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1 p2), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 6 factoid took 131 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 5 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 5 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 220 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 5 to 3
RANDOM walk for 1388 steps (0 resets) in 6 ms. (198 steps per ms) remains 0/3 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1 p2), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p1)), (F p0), (F (NOT p2)), (F (NOT (OR p0 p2 p1))), (F (NOT (OR p0 p2)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 6 factoid took 369 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 5 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 5 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 471 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 197 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Support contains 5 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:05:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:05:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:05:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:05:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 134 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:05:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 521 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 516 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1054ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1055ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1190 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p2 p1), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 107 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 5 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 5 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 175 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 5 to 3
RANDOM walk for 2930 steps (0 resets) in 9 ms. (293 steps per ms) remains 0/3 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p2 p1), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p1)), (F p0), (F (NOT p2)), (F (NOT (OR p2 p0))), (F (NOT (OR p2 p0 p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 319 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 5 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 5 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 213 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 185 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 195 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4447 reset in 275 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4391 reset in 301 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [false, false, true, true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 228 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Support contains 5 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 30 transition count 32
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 28 transition count 30
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 28 transition count 30
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 28 transition count 28
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 28 transition count 30
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 28 transition count 30
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 11 rules in 10 ms. Remains 28 /30 variables (removed 2) and now considering 30/32 (removed 2) transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:05:24] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 30 rows 28 cols
[2024-06-01 08:05:24] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 3 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Problem TDEAD2 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD8 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD12 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD13 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD14 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD18 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 30/58 variables, 28/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/58 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 58/58 variables, and 37 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 21 unsolved in 401 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 7 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/26 variables, 3/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 2/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 2/28 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 30/58 variables, 28/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 21/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 58/58 variables, and 58 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 21 unsolved in 538 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 957ms problems are : Problem set: 7 solved, 21 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 7 dead transitions in 958ms
Found 7 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 7 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 7 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 28/30 places, 23/32 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 62 edges and 28 vertex of which 23 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 5 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 5 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 6 ms. Remains 23 /28 variables (removed 5) and now considering 23/23 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 23/30 places, 23/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 982 ms. Remains : 23/30 places, 23/32 transitions.
Support contains 5 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2024-06-01 08:05:25] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-06-01 08:05:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:05:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:05:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 68 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 120 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:05:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 781 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 767 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1559ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1560ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1681 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-14 finished in 9964 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G((p0&&((!p0 U G(p1)) U p2)))))'
Support contains 3 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 28 transition count 30
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 27 transition count 29
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 27 transition count 29
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 27 transition count 27
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 27 transition count 25
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 25 transition count 25
Applied a total of 12 rules in 8 ms. Remains 25 /30 variables (removed 5) and now considering 25/32 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 25 rows 25 cols
[2024-06-01 08:05:26] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 08:05:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 84 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:05:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:05:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 170 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 08:05:26] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 23 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:05:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 25/50 variables, 25/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/50 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 50/50 variables, and 34 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 367 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 25/50 variables, 25/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 23/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/50 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 50/50 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 461 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 852ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 853ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 25/30 places, 25/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1038 ms. Remains : 25/30 places, 25/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 252 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (NOT p2), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-15
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 44 reset in 401 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 7728 steps with 4 reset with depth 2164 and stack size 2164 in 34 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-15 finished in 1751 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((p0 U G(p1))||F(!p0)))'
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(p0)||X(X(G((F(p2)||p1))))))'
Found a Lengthening insensitive property : TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-14
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 226 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Support contains 5 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 27 transition count 29
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 25 transition count 27
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 25 transition count 27
Applied a total of 10 rules in 8 ms. Remains 25 /30 variables (removed 5) and now considering 27/32 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 27 rows 25 cols
[2024-06-01 08:05:29] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 08:05:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 08:05:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 08:05:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 136 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 23 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 08:05:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/25 variables, 5/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 3/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 27/52 variables, 25/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/52 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 52/52 variables, and 34 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 527 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/25 variables, 5/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 3/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 27/52 variables, 25/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 23/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/52 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 52/52 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 499 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1033ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1034ms
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 25/30 places, 27/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1178 ms. Remains : 25/30 places, 27/32 transitions.
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-14
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4281 reset in 270 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 1691 steps with 80 reset with depth 23 and stack size 23 in 3 ms.
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-14 finished in 1866 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES LENGTHENING_INSENSITIVE
[2024-06-01 08:05:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-01 08:05:30] [INFO ] Export to MCC of 2 properties in file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.sr.xml took 3 ms.
[2024-06-01 08:05:30] [INFO ] Export to PNML in file /home/mcc/execution/model.sr.pnml of net with 30 places, 32 transitions and 108 arcs took 2 ms.
Total runtime 40196 ms.
There are residual formulas that ITS could not solve within timeout
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT PARALLEL_PROCESSING USE_NUPN
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT PARALLEL_PROCESSING USE_NUPN

BK_STOP 1717229133827

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -timeout 360 -rebuildPNML
mcc2024
ltl formula name TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-08
ltl formula formula --ltl=/tmp/1314/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading model from model.pnml
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Edge label is id
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Petri net has 30 places, 32 transitions and 108 arcs
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Petri net Petri analyzed
pnml2lts-mc( 3/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/1314/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/1314/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 2/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/1314/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): There are no safe places
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading Petri net took 0.010 real 0.000 user 0.000 sys
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/1314/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): buchi has 2 states
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): There are 31 state labels and 1 edge labels
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): State length is 31, there are 36 groups
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Running ufscc using 4 cores
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Using a tree table with 2^25 elements
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Successor permutation: dynamic
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Global bits: 0, count bits: 0, local bits: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 3/ 4): ~79 levels ~10000 states ~30216 transitions
pnml2lts-mc( 3/ 4): ~79 levels ~20000 states ~66612 transitions
pnml2lts-mc( 3/ 4): ~79 levels ~40000 states ~149572 transitions
pnml2lts-mc( 3/ 4): ~79 levels ~80000 states ~361224 transitions
pnml2lts-mc( 3/ 4): ~79 levels ~160000 states ~751832 transitions
pnml2lts-mc( 3/ 4): ~79 levels ~320000 states ~1676708 transitions
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Empty product with LTL!
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): total scc count: 564200
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): unique states count: 564200
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): unique transitions count: 3493826
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - self-loop count: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim dead count: 2931764
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim found count: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim success count: 565093
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - cum. max stack depth: 254
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Explored 565093 states 3502346 transitions, fanout: 6.198
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Total exploration time 2.490 sec (2.490 sec minimum, 2.490 sec on average)
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): States per second: 226945, Transitions per second: 1406565
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Queue width: 12B, total height: 0, memory: 0.00MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Tree memory: 5.8MB, 10.8 B/state, compr.: 8.6%
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Tree fill ratio (roots/leafs): 1.0%/2.0%
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Stored 32 string chucks using 0MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Total memory used for chunk indexing: 0MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Est. total memory use: 5.8MB (~256.0MB paged-in)
ltl formula name TCPcondis-PT-10-LTLFireability-14
ltl formula formula --ltl=/tmp/1314/ltl_1_
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading model from model.pnml
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Edge label is id
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Petri net has 30 places, 32 transitions and 108 arcs
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Petri net Petri analyzed
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): There are no safe places
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading Petri net took 0.010 real 0.000 user 0.000 sys
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/1314/ltl_1_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/1314/ltl_1_
pnml2lts-mc( 2/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/1314/ltl_1_
pnml2lts-mc( 3/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/1314/ltl_1_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): buchi has 2 states
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Weak Buchi automaton detected, adding non-accepting as progress label.
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): There are 32 state labels and 1 edge labels
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): State length is 31, there are 38 groups
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Running ufscc using 4 cores
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Using a tree table with 2^25 elements
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Successor permutation: dynamic
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Global bits: 0, count bits: 0, local bits: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4): Accepting cycle FOUND at depth ~75!
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): total scc count: 81
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): unique states count: 352
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): unique transitions count: 2899
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - self-loop count: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim dead count: 81
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim found count: 24
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim success count: 375
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - cum. max stack depth: 294
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Explored 375 states 3099 transitions, fanout: 8.264
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Total exploration time 0.020 sec (0.020 sec minimum, 0.020 sec on average)
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): States per second: 18750, Transitions per second: 154950
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Queue width: 12B, total height: 0, memory: 0.00MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Tree memory: 0.0MB, 29.0 B/state, compr.: 23.0%
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Tree fill ratio (roots/leafs): 0.0%/0.0%
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Stored 32 string chucks using 0MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Total memory used for chunk indexing: 0MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Est. total memory use: 0.0MB (~256.0MB paged-in)

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="TCPcondis-PT-10"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="ltsminxred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool ltsminxred"
echo " Input is TCPcondis-PT-10, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r540-smll-171690573400012"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/TCPcondis-PT-10.tgz
mv TCPcondis-PT-10 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;