About the Execution of LTSMin+red for StigmergyCommit-PT-02a
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
340.928 | 14163.00 | 26180.00 | 50.20 | ??F?TT?FFF???FF? | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r536-tall-171690531600090.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool ltsminxred
Input is StigmergyCommit-PT-02a, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r536-tall-171690531600090
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 456K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.4K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 80K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.7K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 39K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K Apr 23 07:58 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K Apr 23 07:58 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K Apr 23 07:58 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 23 07:58 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.8K Apr 11 17:53 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 106K Apr 11 17:53 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.3K Apr 11 17:53 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 61K Apr 11 17:53 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Apr 23 07:58 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 23 07:58 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 50K May 18 16:43 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2023-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1717227746205
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=ltsminxred
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=StigmergyCommit-PT-02a
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Applying reductions before tool ltsmin
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-06-01 07:42:27] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -timeout, 360, -rebuildPNML]
[2024-06-01 07:42:27] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-06-01 07:42:27] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 70 ms
[2024-06-01 07:42:27] [INFO ] Transformed 112 places.
[2024-06-01 07:42:27] [INFO ] Transformed 204 transitions.
[2024-06-01 07:42:27] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-06-01 07:42:27] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 112 places and 204 transitions and 693 arcs in 170 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 14 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 8 formulas.
Ensure Unique test removed 45 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 45 transitions.
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2024-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2024-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 33 out of 112 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 159/159 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 98 transition count 144
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 98 transition count 144
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 95 transition count 140
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 95 transition count 140
Applied a total of 34 rules in 31 ms. Remains 95 /112 variables (removed 17) and now considering 140/159 (removed 19) transitions.
[2024-06-01 07:42:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 133 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 133 rows 95 cols
[2024-06-01 07:42:27] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 10 ms
[2024-06-01 07:42:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 211 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 07:42:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 133 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2024-06-01 07:42:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 07:42:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 53 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-01 07:42:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 125 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 370 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 139 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 07:42:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 133 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2024-06-01 07:42:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 07:42:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 53 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/95 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
[2024-06-01 07:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 85 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 98 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 13/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
[2024-06-01 07:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 1/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
[2024-06-01 07:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 2/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
[2024-06-01 07:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 132/227 variables, 95/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 52/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/228 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/228 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 228/228 variables, and 168 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved in 7009 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 95/95 constraints, ReadFeed: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 139/139 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/95 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 17/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
[2024-06-01 07:42:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 132/227 variables, 95/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 52/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 139/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 0/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/228 variables, 1/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/228 variables, 0/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 228/228 variables, and 308 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved in 4235 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 95/95 constraints, ReadFeed: 53/53 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 139/139 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints]
After SMT, in 11325ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 139 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11343ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 95/112 places, 140/159 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11762 ms. Remains : 95/112 places, 140/159 transitions.
Support contains 33 out of 95 places after structural reductions.
[2024-06-01 07:42:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2024-06-01 07:42:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-06-01 07:42:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 140 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 10372 steps (36 resets) in 450 ms. (22 steps per ms) remains 0/30 properties
[2024-06-01 07:42:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-01 07:42:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-06-01 07:42:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 140 transitions.
Computed a total of 21 stabilizing places and 20 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 95/95 places, 140/140 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 52 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 52 transitions
Performed 52 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 52
Iterating post reduction 0 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 93 transition count 87
Reduce places removed 52 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 63 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 41 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 39 transition count 74
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 39 transition count 68
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 33 transition count 68
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 145 place count 20 transition count 53
Iterating global reduction 3 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 20 transition count 53
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 20 transition count 45
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 20 transition count 44
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 19 transition count 44
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 170 place count 17 transition count 40
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 172 place count 17 transition count 40
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 17 transition count 34
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 181 place count 17 transition count 31
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 187 place count 14 transition count 28
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 188 place count 13 transition count 27
Applied a total of 188 rules in 21 ms. Remains 13 /95 variables (removed 82) and now considering 27/140 (removed 113) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 21 ms. Remains : 13/95 places, 27/140 transitions.
[2024-06-01 07:42:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-06-01 07:42:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-06-01 07:42:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 27 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 95/95 places, 140/140 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 95 transition count 138
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 93 transition count 135
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 92 transition count 134
Performed 20 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 20 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 92 transition count 114
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 72 transition count 114
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 62 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 62 transition count 102
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 62 transition count 100
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 76 place count 57 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 57 transition count 93
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 57 transition count 91
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 86 place count 54 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 54 transition count 88
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 54 transition count 84
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 51 transition count 81
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 49 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 49 transition count 79
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 49 transition count 75
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 108 place count 48 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 48 transition count 74
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 48 transition count 73
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 8 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 48 transition count 70
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 45 transition count 67
Applied a total of 119 rules in 27 ms. Remains 45 /95 variables (removed 50) and now considering 67/140 (removed 73) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 27 ms. Remains : 45/95 places, 67/140 transitions.
[2024-06-01 07:42:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-01 07:42:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-01 07:42:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 67 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 95/95 places, 140/140 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 81 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 81 transition count 124
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 81 transition count 121
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 73 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 73 transition count 111
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 73 transition count 108
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 70 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 70 transition count 105
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 67 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 67 transition count 102
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 64 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 64 transition count 99
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 64 transition count 97
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 63 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 63 transition count 96
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 63 transition count 95
Applied a total of 73 rules in 14 ms. Remains 63 /95 variables (removed 32) and now considering 95/140 (removed 45) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 14 ms. Remains : 63/95 places, 95/140 transitions.
[2024-06-01 07:42:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 07:42:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 07:42:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 95 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 95/95 places, 140/140 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 81 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 81 transition count 124
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 81 transition count 121
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 73 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 73 transition count 111
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 73 transition count 108
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 70 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 70 transition count 105
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 67 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 67 transition count 102
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 64 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 64 transition count 99
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 64 transition count 97
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 63 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 63 transition count 96
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 63 transition count 95
Applied a total of 73 rules in 11 ms. Remains 63 /95 variables (removed 32) and now considering 95/140 (removed 45) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11 ms. Remains : 63/95 places, 95/140 transitions.
[2024-06-01 07:42:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 07:42:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 07:42:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 95 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 95/95 places, 140/140 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 83 transition count 127
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 83 transition count 127
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 83 transition count 124
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 77 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 77 transition count 117
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 77 transition count 114
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 75 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 75 transition count 112
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 73 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 73 transition count 110
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 71 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 71 transition count 108
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 71 transition count 107
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 70 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 70 transition count 106
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 70 transition count 105
Applied a total of 58 rules in 6 ms. Remains 70 /95 variables (removed 25) and now considering 105/140 (removed 35) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7 ms. Remains : 70/95 places, 105/140 transitions.
[2024-06-01 07:42:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 07:42:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 07:42:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 105 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 95/95 places, 140/140 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 82 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 82 transition count 126
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 82 transition count 123
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 75 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 75 transition count 115
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 75 transition count 112
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 72 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 72 transition count 109
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 69 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 69 transition count 106
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 66 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 66 transition count 103
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 66 transition count 101
Applied a total of 66 rules in 5 ms. Remains 66 /95 variables (removed 29) and now considering 101/140 (removed 39) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5 ms. Remains : 66/95 places, 101/140 transitions.
[2024-06-01 07:42:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 07:42:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 07:42:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 101 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 95/95 places, 140/140 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 89 transition count 134
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 89 transition count 134
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 89 transition count 133
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 84 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 84 transition count 128
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 84 transition count 127
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 82 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 82 transition count 125
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 80 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 80 transition count 123
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 78 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 78 transition count 121
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 78 transition count 120
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 77 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 77 transition count 119
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 77 transition count 118
Applied a total of 40 rules in 5 ms. Remains 77 /95 variables (removed 18) and now considering 118/140 (removed 22) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5 ms. Remains : 77/95 places, 118/140 transitions.
[2024-06-01 07:42:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 07:42:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 07:42:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 118 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 95/95 places, 140/140 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 84 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 84 transition count 128
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 84 transition count 125
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 79 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 79 transition count 119
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 79 transition count 117
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 77 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 77 transition count 115
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 75 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 75 transition count 113
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 73 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 73 transition count 111
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 73 transition count 110
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 72 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 72 transition count 109
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 72 transition count 108
Applied a total of 53 rules in 5 ms. Remains 72 /95 variables (removed 23) and now considering 108/140 (removed 32) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5 ms. Remains : 72/95 places, 108/140 transitions.
[2024-06-01 07:42:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 07:42:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 07:42:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 108 transitions.
[2024-06-01 07:42:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-01 07:42:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-01 07:42:40] [INFO ] Export to MCC of 8 properties in file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.sr.xml took 2 ms.
[2024-06-01 07:42:40] [INFO ] Export to PNML in file /home/mcc/execution/model.sr.pnml of net with 95 places, 140 transitions and 429 arcs took 3 ms.
Total runtime 12758 ms.
There are residual formulas that ITS could not solve within timeout
Usage: pnml2lts-sym [-gvqh] [--order=
[--mu-opt] [--saturation=
[--sat-granularity=
[--guidance=
[--action=
[--trace=
[--mu=
[--ctl=
[--save-levels=STRING] [--pg-solve] [--attr=
[--saturating-attractor] [--write-strategy=
[--check-strategy] [--interactive-play] [--player]
[--pg-write=
[--edge-label=
[--mucalc=
[--allow-undefined-edges] [--allow-undefined-values]
[-p|--por=
[--weak=[valmari] (default: uses stronger left-commutativity)]
[--leap] [-r|--regroup=<(T,)+>] [--sloan-w1=
[--cw-max-cols=
[--mh-timeout=
[--graph-metrics] [--regroup-exit] [--regroup-time]
[-g|--pins-guards] [--vset=
[--ldd32-cache=
[--cache-ratio=
[--min-free-nodes=
[--fdd-reorder=
[--vset-cache-diff=
[--next-union] [--peak-nodes] [--maxsum=
[--block-size=
[--debug=
[--timeout=INT] [--version] [-h|--help] [--usage]
[OPTIONS]
Could not compute solution for formula : StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2024-00
Could not compute solution for formula : StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2024-01
Could not compute solution for formula : StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2024-03
Could not compute solution for formula : StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2024-06
Could not compute solution for formula : StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2024-10
Could not compute solution for formula : StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2024-11
Could not compute solution for formula : StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2023-12
Could not compute solution for formula : StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2023-15
BK_STOP 1717227760368
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -timeout 360 -rebuildPNML
mcc2024
ctl formula name StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2024-00
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/565/ctl_0_
ctl formula name StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2024-01
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/565/ctl_1_
ctl formula name StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2024-03
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/565/ctl_2_
ctl formula name StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2024-06
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/565/ctl_3_
ctl formula name StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2024-10
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/565/ctl_4_
ctl formula name StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2024-11
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/565/ctl_5_
ctl formula name StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2023-12
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/565/ctl_6_
ctl formula name StigmergyCommit-PT-02a-CTLFireability-2023-15
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/565/ctl_7_
pnml2lts-sym, ** error **: unknown vector set implementation lddmc
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="StigmergyCommit-PT-02a"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="ltsminxred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool ltsminxred"
echo " Input is StigmergyCommit-PT-02a, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r536-tall-171690531600090"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/StigmergyCommit-PT-02a.tgz
mv StigmergyCommit-PT-02a execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;