About the Execution of LTSMin+red for ShieldIIPs-PT-002B
| Execution Summary | |||||
| Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
| 337.491 | 54822.00 | 72430.00 | 250.30 | ?TF????????????? | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r528-tall-171683760200026.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...............................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool ltsminxred
Input is ShieldIIPs-PT-002B, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r528-tall-171683760200026
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 544K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 68K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 66K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K May 19 07:15 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 19 16:28 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K Apr 23 07:51 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K Apr 23 07:51 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Apr 11 14:25 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 183K Apr 11 14:25 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.1K Apr 11 14:25 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 59K Apr 11 14:25 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 23 07:51 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 23 07:51 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 33K May 18 16:43 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2023-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1717223236205
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=ltsminxred
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldIIPs-PT-002B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Applying reductions before tool ltsmin
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-06-01 06:27:17] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -timeout, 360, -rebuildPNML]
[2024-06-01 06:27:17] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-06-01 06:27:17] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 59 ms
[2024-06-01 06:27:17] [INFO ] Transformed 123 places.
[2024-06-01 06:27:17] [INFO ] Transformed 121 transitions.
[2024-06-01 06:27:17] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-06-01 06:27:17] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 123 places and 121 transitions and 362 arcs in 163 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 14 ms.
Support contains 94 out of 123 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 123/123 places, 121/121 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 122 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 122 transition count 120
Applied a total of 2 rules in 21 ms. Remains 122 /123 variables (removed 1) and now considering 120/121 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 120 rows 122 cols
[2024-06-01 06:27:17] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 14 ms
[2024-06-01 06:27:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 196 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 06:27:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 06:27:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 118 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 345 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 06:27:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/122 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-06-01 06:27:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 20/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-06-01 06:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 20/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-06-01 06:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 12/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-06-01 06:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 7/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-06-01 06:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 10/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-06-01 06:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 7/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-06-01 06:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 16/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-06-01 06:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 2/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 120/242 variables, 122/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-06-01 06:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 1/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-06-01 06:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/242 variables, 10/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-06-01 06:27:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 7/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-06-01 06:27:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 5/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-06-01 06:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/242 variables, 1/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-06-01 06:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/242 variables, 6/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-06-01 06:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 1/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-06-01 06:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 5/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-06-01 06:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 1/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-06-01 06:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 5/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-06-01 06:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 2/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 0/242 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 242/242 variables, and 279 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 20719 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 122/122 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 138/138 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/122 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 138/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-06-01 06:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 4/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-06-01 06:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 5/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-06-01 06:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 1/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 120/242 variables, 122/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 119/408 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-06-01 06:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 2/410 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-06-01 06:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 6/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-06-01 06:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 7/423 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-06-01 06:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 39 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 4/427 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-06-01 06:27:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 06:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 8/435 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-06-01 06:27:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 1/436 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-06-01 06:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 1/437 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/437 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
[2024-06-01 06:28:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/242 variables, 1/438 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 242/242 variables, and 438 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 30026 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 122/122 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 178/178 constraints]
After SMT, in 50831ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 50848ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 122/123 places, 120/121 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 51238 ms. Remains : 122/123 places, 120/121 transitions.
Support contains 94 out of 122 places after structural reductions.
[2024-06-01 06:28:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2024-06-01 06:28:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2024-06-01 06:28:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 120 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (116 resets) in 1304 ms. (30 steps per ms) remains 6/96 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (27 resets) in 216 ms. (184 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (30 resets) in 179 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (23 resets) in 106 ms. (373 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (17 resets) in 135 ms. (294 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (24 resets) in 69 ms. (571 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (18 resets) in 79 ms. (500 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
[2024-06-01 06:28:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp2 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp4 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp20 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp28 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp70 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 104/122 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 120/242 variables, 122/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/242 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 242/242 variables, and 141 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 5 solved, 1 unsolved in 77 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 122/122 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 5 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp81 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/242 variables, and 19 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 6 solved, 0 unsolved in 32 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 0/122 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/6 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 115ms problems are : Problem set: 6 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 6 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2024-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
FORMULA ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2024-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 120 transitions.
Support contains 89 out of 122 places (down from 90) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 32 stabilizing places and 32 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 122/122 places, 120/120 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 109 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 109 transition count 107
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 108 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 108 transition count 106
Applied a total of 28 rules in 12 ms. Remains 108 /122 variables (removed 14) and now considering 106/120 (removed 14) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12 ms. Remains : 108/122 places, 106/120 transitions.
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 106 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 122/122 places, 120/120 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 121 transition count 109
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 111 transition count 109
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 111 transition count 100
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 102 transition count 100
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 92 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 92 transition count 90
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 92 transition count 86
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 88 transition count 86
Performed 29 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 29
Deduced a syphon composed of 29 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 29 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 59 transition count 57
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 57 transition count 55
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 56 transition count 55
Applied a total of 127 rules in 32 ms. Remains 56 /122 variables (removed 66) and now considering 55/120 (removed 65) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 32 ms. Remains : 56/122 places, 55/120 transitions.
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 122/122 places, 120/120 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 116 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 116 transition count 114
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 115 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 115 transition count 113
Applied a total of 14 rules in 8 ms. Remains 115 /122 variables (removed 7) and now considering 113/120 (removed 7) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8 ms. Remains : 115/122 places, 113/120 transitions.
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 113 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 122/122 places, 120/120 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 110 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 110 transition count 108
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 109 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 109 transition count 107
Applied a total of 26 rules in 6 ms. Remains 109 /122 variables (removed 13) and now considering 107/120 (removed 13) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6 ms. Remains : 109/122 places, 107/120 transitions.
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 122/122 places, 120/120 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 115 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 115 transition count 113
Applied a total of 14 rules in 7 ms. Remains 115 /122 variables (removed 7) and now considering 113/120 (removed 7) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7 ms. Remains : 115/122 places, 113/120 transitions.
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 113 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 122/122 places, 120/120 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 109 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 109 transition count 107
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 108 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 108 transition count 106
Applied a total of 28 rules in 8 ms. Remains 108 /122 variables (removed 14) and now considering 106/120 (removed 14) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8 ms. Remains : 108/122 places, 106/120 transitions.
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 106 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 122/122 places, 120/120 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 121 transition count 109
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 111 transition count 109
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 111 transition count 98
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 100 transition count 98
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 88 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 88 transition count 86
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 88 transition count 81
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 83 transition count 81
Performed 26 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 26
Deduced a syphon composed of 26 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 57 transition count 55
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 55 transition count 53
Applied a total of 130 rules in 17 ms. Remains 55 /122 variables (removed 67) and now considering 53/120 (removed 67) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 17 ms. Remains : 55/122 places, 53/120 transitions.
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 53 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 122/122 places, 120/120 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 112 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 112 transition count 110
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 111 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 111 transition count 109
Applied a total of 22 rules in 4 ms. Remains 111 /122 variables (removed 11) and now considering 109/120 (removed 11) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4 ms. Remains : 111/122 places, 109/120 transitions.
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 109 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 122/122 places, 120/120 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 111 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 111 transition count 109
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 110 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 110 transition count 108
Applied a total of 24 rules in 4 ms. Remains 110 /122 variables (removed 12) and now considering 108/120 (removed 12) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4 ms. Remains : 110/122 places, 108/120 transitions.
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 108 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 122/122 places, 120/120 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 115 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 115 transition count 113
Applied a total of 14 rules in 2 ms. Remains 115 /122 variables (removed 7) and now considering 113/120 (removed 7) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 115/122 places, 113/120 transitions.
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 113 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 122/122 places, 120/120 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 111 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 111 transition count 109
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 110 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 110 transition count 108
Applied a total of 24 rules in 3 ms. Remains 110 /122 variables (removed 12) and now considering 108/120 (removed 12) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4 ms. Remains : 110/122 places, 108/120 transitions.
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 108 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 122/122 places, 120/120 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 109 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 109 transition count 107
Applied a total of 26 rules in 2 ms. Remains 109 /122 variables (removed 13) and now considering 107/120 (removed 13) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 109/122 places, 107/120 transitions.
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 122/122 places, 120/120 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 109 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 109 transition count 107
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 108 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 108 transition count 106
Applied a total of 28 rules in 3 ms. Remains 108 /122 variables (removed 14) and now considering 106/120 (removed 14) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4 ms. Remains : 108/122 places, 106/120 transitions.
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 106 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 122/122 places, 120/120 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 111 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 111 transition count 109
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 110 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 110 transition count 108
Applied a total of 24 rules in 3 ms. Remains 110 /122 variables (removed 12) and now considering 108/120 (removed 12) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 110/122 places, 108/120 transitions.
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 108 transitions.
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Export to MCC of 14 properties in file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.sr.xml took 3 ms.
[2024-06-01 06:28:10] [INFO ] Export to PNML in file /home/mcc/execution/model.sr.pnml of net with 122 places, 120 transitions and 360 arcs took 2 ms.
Total runtime 53232 ms.
There are residual formulas that ITS could not solve within timeout
Usage: pnml2lts-sym [-gvqh] [--order=
[--mu-opt] [--saturation=
[--sat-granularity=
[--guidance=
[--action=
[--trace=
[--mu=
[--ctl=
[--save-levels=STRING] [--pg-solve] [--attr=
[--saturating-attractor] [--write-strategy=
[--check-strategy] [--interactive-play] [--player]
[--pg-write=
[--edge-label=
[--mucalc=
[--allow-undefined-edges] [--allow-undefined-values]
[-p|--por=
[--weak=[valmari] (default: uses stronger left-commutativity)]
[--leap] [-r|--regroup=<(T,)+>] [--sloan-w1=
[--cw-max-cols=
[--mh-timeout=
[--graph-metrics] [--regroup-exit] [--regroup-time]
[-g|--pins-guards] [--vset=
[--ldd32-cache=
[--cache-ratio=
[--min-free-nodes=
[--fdd-reorder=
[--vset-cache-diff=
[--next-union] [--peak-nodes] [--maxsum=
[--block-size=
[--debug=
[--timeout=INT] [--version] [-h|--help] [--usage]
[OPTIONS]
Could not compute solution for formula : ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2024-00
Could not compute solution for formula : ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2024-03
Could not compute solution for formula : ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2024-04
Could not compute solution for formula : ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2024-05
Could not compute solution for formula : ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2024-06
Could not compute solution for formula : ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2024-07
Could not compute solution for formula : ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2024-08
Could not compute solution for formula : ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2024-09
Could not compute solution for formula : ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2024-10
Could not compute solution for formula : ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2024-11
Could not compute solution for formula : ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2023-12
Could not compute solution for formula : ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2023-13
Could not compute solution for formula : ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2023-14
Could not compute solution for formula : ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2023-15
BK_STOP 1717223291027
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -timeout 360 -rebuildPNML
mcc2024
ctl formula name ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2024-00
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/1055/ctl_0_
ctl formula name ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2024-03
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/1055/ctl_1_
ctl formula name ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2024-04
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/1055/ctl_2_
ctl formula name ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2024-05
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/1055/ctl_3_
ctl formula name ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2024-06
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/1055/ctl_4_
ctl formula name ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2024-07
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/1055/ctl_5_
ctl formula name ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2024-08
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/1055/ctl_6_
ctl formula name ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2024-09
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/1055/ctl_7_
ctl formula name ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2024-10
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/1055/ctl_8_
ctl formula name ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2024-11
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/1055/ctl_9_
ctl formula name ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2023-12
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/1055/ctl_10_
ctl formula name ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2023-13
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/1055/ctl_11_
ctl formula name ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2023-14
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/1055/ctl_12_
ctl formula name ShieldIIPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2023-15
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/1055/ctl_13_
pnml2lts-sym, ** error **: unknown vector set implementation lddmc
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldIIPs-PT-002B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="ltsminxred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool ltsminxred"
echo " Input is ShieldIIPs-PT-002B, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r528-tall-171683760200026"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldIIPs-PT-002B.tgz
mv ShieldIIPs-PT-002B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;