About the Execution of LTSMin+red for ResAllocation-PT-R020C002
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
305.571 | 5244.00 | 13802.00 | 52.80 | [undef] | Cannot compute |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r520-tall-171662339500866.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool ltsminxred
Input is ResAllocation-PT-R020C002, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r520-tall-171662339500866
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 576K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.0K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 100K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 60K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 23 07:48 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K Apr 23 07:48 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K Apr 23 07:48 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 23 07:48 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.7K Apr 11 23:25 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 93K Apr 11 23:25 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Apr 11 23:24 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 96K Apr 11 23:24 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K Apr 23 07:48 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 23 07:48 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 85K May 18 16:43 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R020C002-CTLFireability-2023-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1717265243176
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=ltsminxred
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ResAllocation-PT-R020C002
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Applying reductions before tool ltsmin
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-06-01 18:07:24] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -timeout, 360, -rebuildPNML]
[2024-06-01 18:07:24] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-06-01 18:07:24] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 66 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:24] [INFO ] Transformed 80 places.
[2024-06-01 18:07:24] [INFO ] Transformed 42 transitions.
[2024-06-01 18:07:24] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-06-01 18:07:24] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 80 places and 42 transitions and 200 arcs in 157 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 14 ms.
Support contains 76 out of 80 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 80/80 places, 42/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 80 /80 variables (removed 0) and now considering 42/42 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 42 rows 80 cols
[2024-06-01 18:07:24] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 9 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 176 ms returned [67, 71]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 207 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 78/80 places, 42/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 42/42 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 233 ms. Remains : 78/80 places, 42/42 transitions.
Support contains 76 out of 78 places after structural reductions.
[2024-06-01 18:07:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 64 to 58
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (342 resets) in 2012 ms. (19 steps per ms) remains 12/58 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (64 resets) in 389 ms. (102 steps per ms) remains 12/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (39 resets) in 230 ms. (173 steps per ms) remains 7/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (30 resets) in 120 ms. (330 steps per ms) remains 4/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (64 resets) in 111 ms. (357 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (64 resets) in 119 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (76 resets) in 143 ms. (277 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 42 rows 78 cols
[2024-06-01 18:07:26] [INFO ] Computed 38 invariants in 8 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp16 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 20/32 variables, 14/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 20/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 3/35 variables, 3/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 3/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 26/61 variables, 35/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 34/95 variables, 24/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 24/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 12/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 21/116 variables, 15/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 15/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 7/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 4/120 variables, 4/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 4/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 2/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 120/120 variables, and 194 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved in 288 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 38/38 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 14/21 variables, 9/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 14/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 2/23 variables, 2/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 2/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 18/41 variables, 23/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 24/65 variables, 16/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 16/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 8/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 2/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 23/88 variables, 15/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 15/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 7/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 16/104 variables, 12/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 12/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 6/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 12/116 variables, 8/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 8/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 4/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (OVERLAPS) 4/120 variables, 4/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 4/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 2/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 120/120 variables, and 197 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved in 255 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 78/78 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 38/38 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 579ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
Fused 3 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 2 properties in 82 ms.
Support contains 5 out of 78 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 42/42 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 75 transition count 40
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 75 transition count 39
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 73 transition count 39
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 73 transition count 38
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 70 transition count 38
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 69 transition count 37
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 69 transition count 36
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 66 transition count 36
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 65 transition count 35
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 65 transition count 34
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 62 transition count 34
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 61 transition count 33
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 61 transition count 32
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 58 transition count 32
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 57 transition count 31
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 57 transition count 30
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 55 transition count 30
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 54 transition count 29
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 54 transition count 28
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 51 transition count 28
Applied a total of 41 rules in 50 ms. Remains 51 /78 variables (removed 27) and now considering 28/42 (removed 14) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 51 ms. Remains : 51/78 places, 28/42 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (751 resets) in 401 ms. (99 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (172 resets) in 76 ms. (519 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Probably explored full state space saw : 61440 states, properties seen :0
Probabilistic random walk after 311296 steps, saw 61440 distinct states, run finished after 319 ms. (steps per millisecond=975 ) properties seen :0
Explored full state space saw : 61440 states, properties seen :0
Exhaustive walk after 311296 steps, saw 61440 distinct states, run finished after 246 ms. (steps per millisecond=1265 ) properties seen :0
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
Support contains 74 out of 78 places (down from 76) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 42/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 42/42 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 78/78 places, 42/42 transitions.
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 42/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 42/42 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 78/78 places, 42/42 transitions.
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 42/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 42/42 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 78/78 places, 42/42 transitions.
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 42/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 42/42 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 78/78 places, 42/42 transitions.
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 42/42 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 75 transition count 40
Applied a total of 5 rules in 5 ms. Remains 75 /78 variables (removed 3) and now considering 40/42 (removed 2) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6 ms. Remains : 75/78 places, 40/42 transitions.
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 40 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 42/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 42/42 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1 ms. Remains : 78/78 places, 42/42 transitions.
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 42/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 42/42 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 78/78 places, 42/42 transitions.
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 42/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 42/42 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1 ms. Remains : 78/78 places, 42/42 transitions.
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 42/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 42/42 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1 ms. Remains : 78/78 places, 42/42 transitions.
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 42/42 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 75 transition count 40
Applied a total of 5 rules in 4 ms. Remains 75 /78 variables (removed 3) and now considering 40/42 (removed 2) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4 ms. Remains : 75/78 places, 40/42 transitions.
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 40 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 42/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 42/42 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1 ms. Remains : 78/78 places, 42/42 transitions.
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 42/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 42/42 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1 ms. Remains : 78/78 places, 42/42 transitions.
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 42/42 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 75 transition count 40
Applied a total of 5 rules in 4 ms. Remains 75 /78 variables (removed 3) and now considering 40/42 (removed 2) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5 ms. Remains : 75/78 places, 40/42 transitions.
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 40 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 42/42 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 78 /78 variables (removed 0) and now considering 42/42 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1 ms. Remains : 78/78 places, 42/42 transitions.
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 42/42 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 75 transition count 40
Applied a total of 5 rules in 4 ms. Remains 75 /78 variables (removed 3) and now considering 40/42 (removed 2) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4 ms. Remains : 75/78 places, 40/42 transitions.
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 40 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 42/42 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 75 transition count 40
Applied a total of 5 rules in 4 ms. Remains 75 /78 variables (removed 3) and now considering 40/42 (removed 2) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5 ms. Remains : 75/78 places, 40/42 transitions.
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 40 transitions.
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Export to MCC of 16 properties in file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.sr.xml took 5 ms.
[2024-06-01 18:07:27] [INFO ] Export to PNML in file /home/mcc/execution/model.sr.pnml of net with 78 places, 42 transitions and 196 arcs took 1 ms.
Total runtime 3662 ms.
There are residual formulas that ITS could not solve within timeout
Usage: pnml2lts-sym [-gvqh] [--order=
[--mu-opt] [--saturation=
[--sat-granularity=
[--guidance=
[--action=
[--trace=
[--mu=
[--ctl=
[--save-levels=STRING] [--pg-solve] [--attr=
[--saturating-attractor] [--write-strategy=
[--check-strategy] [--interactive-play] [--player]
[--pg-write=
[--edge-label=
[--mucalc=
[--allow-undefined-edges] [--allow-undefined-values]
[-p|--por=
[--weak=[valmari] (default: uses stronger left-commutativity)]
[--leap] [-r|--regroup=<(T,)+>] [--sloan-w1=
[--cw-max-cols=
[--mh-timeout=
[--graph-metrics] [--regroup-exit] [--regroup-time]
[-g|--pins-guards] [--vset=
[--ldd32-cache=
[--cache-ratio=
[--min-free-nodes=
[--fdd-reorder=
[--vset-cache-diff=
[--next-union] [--peak-nodes] [--maxsum=
[--block-size=
[--debug=
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ResAllocation-PT-R020C002"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="ltsminxred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool ltsminxred"
echo " Input is ResAllocation-PT-R020C002, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r520-tall-171662339500866"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ResAllocation-PT-R020C002.tgz
mv ResAllocation-PT-R020C002 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;