Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r520-tall-171662339500860.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool ltsminxred
Input is ResAllocation-PT-R015C002, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r520-tall-171662339500860
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 564K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.1K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 74K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 60K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K Apr 23 07:48 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K Apr 23 07:48 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K Apr 23 07:48 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 23 07:48 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K Apr 11 23:32 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 142K Apr 11 23:32 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.9K Apr 11 23:30 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 84K Apr 11 23:30 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K Apr 23 07:48 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 23 07:48 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 64K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1717265191069

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=ltsminxred
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ResAllocation-PT-R015C002
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Applying reductions before tool ltsmin
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-06-01 18:06:32] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -timeout, 360, -rebuildPNML]
[2024-06-01 18:06:32] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-06-01 18:06:32] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 64 ms
[2024-06-01 18:06:32] [INFO ] Transformed 60 places.
[2024-06-01 18:06:32] [INFO ] Transformed 32 transitions.
[2024-06-01 18:06:32] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-06-01 18:06:32] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 60 places and 32 transitions and 150 arcs in 184 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 10 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Support contains 45 out of 60 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 60/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 16 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 60 cols
[2024-06-01 18:06:32] [INFO ] Computed 30 invariants in 10 ms
[2024-06-01 18:06:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 269 ms returned [31, 33, 35, 45, 53]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 326 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 55/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 55 /55 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 372 ms. Remains : 55/60 places, 32/32 transitions.
Support contains 45 out of 55 places after structural reductions.
[2024-06-01 18:06:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2024-06-01 18:06:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-06-01 18:06:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 28 to 26
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (584 resets) in 1905 ms. (20 steps per ms) remains 3/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (131 resets) in 136 ms. (292 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (64 resets) in 134 ms. (296 steps per ms) remains 2/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (132 resets) in 107 ms. (370 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 55 cols
[2024-06-01 18:06:34] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 2 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/6 variables, 2/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 4/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/7 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 8/15 variables, 7/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 11/26 variables, 7/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 7/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 3/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 11/37 variables, 7/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 7/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 3/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 11/48 variables, 7/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 7/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 3/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 12/60 variables, 8/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 8/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 4/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 12/72 variables, 8/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 8/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 4/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (OVERLAPS) 12/84 variables, 8/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 8/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 4/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (OVERLAPS) 3/87 variables, 3/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 3/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 1/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 37 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 0/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 38 (OVERLAPS) 0/87 variables, 0/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 87/87 variables, and 135 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 220 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 55/55 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 55/55 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/6 variables, 2/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 4/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/7 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 8/15 variables, 7/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 11/26 variables, 7/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 7/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 3/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 2/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 11/37 variables, 7/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 7/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 3/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 11/48 variables, 7/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 7/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 3/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 12/60 variables, 8/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 8/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 4/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 12/72 variables, 8/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 8/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 4/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (OVERLAPS) 12/84 variables, 8/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 8/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 4/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (OVERLAPS) 3/87 variables, 3/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 3/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 37 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 1/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 38 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 39 (OVERLAPS) 0/87 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 87/87 variables, and 137 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 154 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 55/55 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 55/55 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 400ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Fused 2 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Finished Parikh walk after 1634 steps, including 100 resets, run visited all 2 properties in 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=148 )
Parikh walk visited 2 properties in 16 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_KNOWLEDGE
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((p0 U p1)||(X(X(!p2)) U ((X(X(!p2))&&G(!p3))||X(X(G(!p2)))))))'
Support contains 10 out of 55 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 55/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 55 /55 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 18:06:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 18:06:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned [34, 36, 38, 45, 47, 52, 54]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 53 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 48/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 48 /48 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 55 ms. Remains : 48/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 837 ms :[p2, (AND (NOT p1) p2), p2, (AND p2 p3), (AND p2 p3), p2, (AND (NOT p1) p2), (AND (NOT p1) p2 p3), (AND (NOT p1) p2 p3), (AND (NOT p1) p2), true, (AND p2 p3), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) p2 p3), (AND (NOT p2) p3), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p3)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-00
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 24277 steps with 6000 reset in 128 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-00 finished in 1108 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((p0&&X((G(p2)&&p1)))))'
Support contains 6 out of 55 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 55/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 55 /55 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 18:06:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 18:06:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned [34, 36, 38, 40, 43, 45, 50, 52]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 64 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 47/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 47 /47 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 67 ms. Remains : 47/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 186 ms :[true, (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (NOT p2), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-01
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-01 finished in 274 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 3 out of 55 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 55/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 53 transition count 30
Applied a total of 4 rules in 25 ms. Remains 53 /55 variables (removed 2) and now considering 30/32 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 30 rows 53 cols
[2024-06-01 18:06:36] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 18:06:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 90 ms returned [34, 36, 38, 41, 43, 45, 48, 50, 52]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 92 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/55 places, 30/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 30/30 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 126 ms. Remains : 44/55 places, 30/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 29 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-02
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 64 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-02 finished in 169 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)&&F(G((p0 U p1))))))'
Support contains 4 out of 55 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 55/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 54 transition count 31
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 54 /55 variables (removed 1) and now considering 31/32 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 31 rows 54 cols
[2024-06-01 18:06:36] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 18:06:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned [33, 35, 39, 42, 44, 46, 49, 51, 53]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 61 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/55 places, 31/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 31/31 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 67 ms. Remains : 45/55 places, 31/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 133 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-03
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 70 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-03 finished in 214 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G(p0)))'
Support contains 4 out of 55 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 55/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 55 /55 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 55 cols
[2024-06-01 18:06:36] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-06-01 18:06:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned [34, 36, 38, 40, 43, 45, 47, 50, 52, 54]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 68 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 72 ms. Remains : 45/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 77 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-05
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-05 finished in 158 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(X(X(G(p0))))))'
Support contains 1 out of 55 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 55/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 55 /55 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 18:06:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 18:06:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned [34, 36, 38, 40, 43, 45, 47, 50, 52, 54]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 65 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 68 ms. Remains : 45/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 194 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-06
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 4 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-06 finished in 281 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 55 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 55/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 55 /55 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 18:06:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 18:06:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned [34, 36, 38, 40, 43, 45, 47, 50, 52, 54]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 54 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 57 ms. Remains : 45/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 72 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-07
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 124 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 159 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 19 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-07 finished in 449 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((G(p0)||(X(G(p2))&&p1))))'
Support contains 6 out of 55 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 55/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 54 transition count 31
Applied a total of 2 rules in 5 ms. Remains 54 /55 variables (removed 1) and now considering 31/32 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 31 rows 54 cols
[2024-06-01 18:06:37] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 18:06:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned [33, 35, 37, 39, 42, 44, 46, 49, 51]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 50 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/55 places, 31/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 31/31 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 57 ms. Remains : 45/55 places, 31/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 65 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-08
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 261 steps with 3 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-08 finished in 139 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(G(p0)) U (X(G(p2))&&p1)))'
Support contains 7 out of 55 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 55/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 55 /55 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 55 cols
[2024-06-01 18:06:37] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 18:06:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned [34, 38, 40, 43, 45, 47, 50, 54]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 48 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 47/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 47 /47 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 52 ms. Remains : 47/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 92 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p0), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-09
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 66 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-09 finished in 159 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(F((p0&&X(X(p0)))))&&(!p1 U (p2||G(!p1)))))'
Support contains 7 out of 55 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 55/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 55 /55 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 18:06:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 18:06:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned [36, 38, 40, 43, 45, 47, 50, 52, 54]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 69 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 46/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 72 ms. Remains : 46/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 250 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (AND p1 (NOT p2))), true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p2) p1), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-10
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25012 reset in 132 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25134 reset in 142 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 (NOT p1) p0), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1))), (X p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 11 factoid took 133 ms. Reduced automaton from 8 states, 17 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 9 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 211 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (582 resets) in 219 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 546 steps (0 resets) in 7 ms. (68 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 (NOT p1) p0), (X p2), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1))), (X p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 11 factoid took 272 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 9 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 9 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 185 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 169 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 2 out of 46 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 46 cols
[2024-06-01 18:06:39] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 18:06:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 18:06:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 18:06:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 108 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 30 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 18:06:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 16/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
[2024-06-01 18:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:06:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:06:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:06:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:06:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:06:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:06:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:06:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:06:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 15/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 32/78 variables, 46/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/78 variables, 0/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 78/78 variables, and 123 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved in 779 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 46/46 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 16/16 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 16/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 15/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 32/78 variables, 46/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 30/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/78 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 78/78 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved in 439 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 46/46 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 16/16 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints]
After SMT, in 1232ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 30 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1234ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1344 ms. Remains : 46/46 places, 32/32 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 81 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 9 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 9 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 163 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (583 resets) in 120 ms. (330 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 479 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (95 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 91 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 9 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 9 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 177 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 177 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 158 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25047 reset in 81 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 24947 reset in 190 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 46 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 18:06:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 18:06:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned [34]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 47 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/46 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 50 ms. Remains : 45/46 places, 32/32 transitions.
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-10 finished in 4485 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(p0)||G(p1)))'
Support contains 9 out of 55 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 55/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 53 transition count 30
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 53 /55 variables (removed 2) and now considering 30/32 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 30 rows 53 cols
[2024-06-01 18:06:42] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-06-01 18:06:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned [32, 34, 36, 41, 43, 45, 48, 50, 52]
Discarding 9 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 68 ms to find 9 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/55 places, 30/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 30/30 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 72 ms. Remains : 44/55 places, 30/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 68 ms :[(NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-11
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 88 steps with 1 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-11 finished in 153 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(F(p0))))'
Support contains 2 out of 55 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 55/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 55 /55 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 55 cols
[2024-06-01 18:06:42] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 18:06:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned [34, 36, 38, 40, 43, 45, 47, 50, 52, 54]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 62 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 64 ms. Remains : 45/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 94 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-12
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 66 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-12 finished in 169 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((G(p0) U p1)||X(G(p2))))'
Support contains 8 out of 55 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 55/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 55 /55 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 18:06:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 18:06:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned [34, 36, 38, 40, 43, 47, 52]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 47 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 48/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 48 /48 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 49 ms. Remains : 48/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 211 ms :[true, (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-13
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-13 finished in 277 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)&&F(G(p1)))))'
Support contains 5 out of 55 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 55/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 54 transition count 31
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 54 /55 variables (removed 1) and now considering 31/32 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 31 rows 54 cols
[2024-06-01 18:06:42] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 18:06:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned [33, 35, 37, 39, 42, 44, 46, 49, 51, 53]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 48 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/55 places, 31/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 31/31 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 53 ms. Remains : 44/55 places, 31/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 92 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-14
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 64 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-14 finished in 169 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 55 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 55/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 55 /55 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 55 cols
[2024-06-01 18:06:43] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-06-01 18:06:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned [34, 36, 38, 40, 43, 45, 47, 50, 52, 54]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 61 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 63 ms. Remains : 45/55 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 98 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-15
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 86 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 137 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 21 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-15 finished in 431 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(F((p0&&X(X(p0)))))&&(!p1 U (p2||G(!p1)))))'
[2024-06-01 18:06:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 18:06:43] [INFO ] Export to MCC of 1 properties in file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.sr.xml took 2 ms.
[2024-06-01 18:06:43] [INFO ] Export to PNML in file /home/mcc/execution/model.sr.pnml of net with 55 places, 32 transitions and 140 arcs took 3 ms.
Total runtime 11498 ms.
There are residual formulas that ITS could not solve within timeout
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT PARALLEL_PROCESSING USE_NUPN

BK_STOP 1717265207532

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -timeout 360 -rebuildPNML
mcc2024
ltl formula name ResAllocation-PT-R015C002-LTLFireability-10
ltl formula formula --ltl=/tmp/1109/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading model from model.pnml
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Edge label is id
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Petri net has 55 places, 32 transitions and 140 arcs
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Petri net Petri analyzed
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): There are no safe places
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading Petri net took 0.010 real 0.000 user 0.000 sys
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/1109/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/1109/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 2/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/1109/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 3/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/1109/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): buchi has 8 states
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Weak Buchi automaton detected, adding non-accepting as progress label.
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): There are 57 state labels and 1 edge labels
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): State length is 56, there are 116 groups
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Running ufscc using 4 cores
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Using a tree table with 2^25 elements
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Successor permutation: dynamic
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Global bits: 0, count bits: 0, local bits: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4): ~71 levels ~10000 states ~40092 transitions
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): ~65 levels ~20000 states ~97800 transitions
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): ~65 levels ~40000 states ~212360 transitions
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4): ~83 levels ~80000 states ~448920 transitions
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4): ~302 levels ~160000 states ~906748 transitions
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4): ~1959 levels ~320000 states ~1773232 transitions
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4): ~12680 levels ~640000 states ~3639808 transitions
pnml2lts-mc( 2/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 2/ 4): Accepting cycle FOUND at depth ~34!
pnml2lts-mc( 2/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): total scc count: 719838
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): unique states count: 752521
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): unique transitions count: 4478193
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - self-loop count: 14
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim dead count: 3628995
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim found count: 86156
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim success count: 778652
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - cum. max stack depth: 23677
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Explored 778655 states 4750664 transitions, fanout: 6.101
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Total exploration time 2.920 sec (2.900 sec minimum, 2.912 sec on average)
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): States per second: 266663, Transitions per second: 1626940
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Queue width: 12B, total height: 0, memory: 0.00MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Tree memory: 6.5MB, 9.1 B/state, compr.: 4.0%
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Tree fill ratio (roots/leafs): 2.0%/1.0%
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Stored 32 string chucks using 0MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Total memory used for chunk indexing: 0MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Est. total memory use: 6.5MB (~256.0MB paged-in)

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ResAllocation-PT-R015C002"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="ltsminxred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool ltsminxred"
echo " Input is ResAllocation-PT-R015C002, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r520-tall-171662339500860"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ResAllocation-PT-R015C002.tgz
mv ResAllocation-PT-R015C002 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;