fond
Model Checking Contest 2024
14th edition, Geneva, Switzerland, June 25, 2024
Execution of r520-tall-171662339400828
Last Updated
July 7, 2024

About the Execution of LTSMin+red for ResAllocation-PT-R003C050

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
512.487 114484.00 161340.00 493.40 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFT normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r520-tall-171662339400828.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool ltsminxred
Input is ResAllocation-PT-R003C050, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r520-tall-171662339400828
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 796K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.6K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 78K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.9K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 42K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K Apr 23 07:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K Apr 23 07:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K Apr 23 07:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 23 07:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K Apr 11 23:24 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 112K Apr 11 23:24 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.2K Apr 11 23:23 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 65K Apr 11 23:23 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K Apr 23 07:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 23 07:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 360K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1717264832124

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=ltsminxred
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ResAllocation-PT-R003C050
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Applying reductions before tool ltsmin
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-06-01 18:00:33] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -timeout, 360, -rebuildPNML]
[2024-06-01 18:00:33] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-06-01 18:00:33] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 101 ms
[2024-06-01 18:00:33] [INFO ] Transformed 300 places.
[2024-06-01 18:00:33] [INFO ] Transformed 200 transitions.
[2024-06-01 18:00:33] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-06-01 18:00:33] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 300 places and 200 transitions and 894 arcs in 191 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 10 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 5 formulas.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 54 out of 300 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 300/300 places, 200/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 36 ms. Remains 300 /300 variables (removed 0) and now considering 200/200 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 200 rows 300 cols
[2024-06-01 18:00:33] [INFO ] Computed 150 invariants in 9 ms
[2024-06-01 18:00:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 543 ms returned [295, 297]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 586 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 298/300 places, 200/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 30 ms. Remains 298 /298 variables (removed 0) and now considering 200/200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 687 ms. Remains : 298/300 places, 200/200 transitions.
Support contains 54 out of 298 places after structural reductions.
[2024-06-01 18:00:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 54 ms
[2024-06-01 18:00:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2024-06-01 18:00:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 200 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 25 to 23
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (375 resets) in 1899 ms. (21 steps per ms) remains 1/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (9 resets) in 230 ms. (173 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 200 rows 298 cols
[2024-06-01 18:00:35] [INFO ] Computed 148 invariants in 7 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp5 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 12/498 variables, and 9 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 45 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 4/298 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/148 constraints, State Equation: 0/298 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 76ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 11 simplifications.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((F(p0)&&X(p1)&&F(p2))))'
Support contains 5 out of 298 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 298 /298 variables (removed 0) and now considering 200/200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 18:00:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 18:00:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 205 ms returned [297]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 211 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 297/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 297 /297 variables (removed 0) and now considering 200/200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 225 ms. Remains : 297/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 351 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1), (NOT p2), true]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-01
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 109 steps with 3 reset in 5 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-01 finished in 646 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 3 out of 298 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Performed 49 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 49
Deduced a syphon composed of 49 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 49 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 98 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 249 transition count 151
Applied a total of 98 rules in 60 ms. Remains 249 /298 variables (removed 49) and now considering 151/200 (removed 49) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 151 rows 249 cols
[2024-06-01 18:00:36] [INFO ] Computed 148 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 18:00:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 161 ms returned [248]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 175 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 248/298 places, 151/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 248 /248 variables (removed 0) and now considering 151/151 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 246 ms. Remains : 248/298 places, 151/200 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 45 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-02
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 92 steps with 0 reset in 4 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-02 finished in 317 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 4 out of 298 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Performed 46 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 46
Deduced a syphon composed of 46 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 46 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 92 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 252 transition count 154
Applied a total of 92 rules in 34 ms. Remains 252 /298 variables (removed 46) and now considering 154/200 (removed 46) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 154 rows 252 cols
[2024-06-01 18:00:36] [INFO ] Computed 148 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 18:00:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 209 ms returned [251]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 212 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 251/298 places, 154/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 251 /251 variables (removed 0) and now considering 154/154 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 255 ms. Remains : 251/298 places, 154/200 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 89 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-03
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1489 reset in 761 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 14411 steps with 212 reset with depth 49 and stack size 49 in 98 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-03 finished in 1221 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X((p0&&(F(p1) U G(p2))))))'
Support contains 8 out of 298 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 13 ms. Remains 298 /298 variables (removed 0) and now considering 200/200 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 200 rows 298 cols
[2024-06-01 18:00:37] [INFO ] Computed 148 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 18:00:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 174 ms returned [297]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 175 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 297/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 297 /297 variables (removed 0) and now considering 200/200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 191 ms. Remains : 297/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 194 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), true, (NOT p1), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-05
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-05 finished in 431 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(F(p0))||(F(p1)&&X(p2))))'
Support contains 5 out of 298 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 298 /298 variables (removed 0) and now considering 200/200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 18:00:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 18:00:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 175 ms returned [297]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 177 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 297/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 297 /297 variables (removed 0) and now considering 200/200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 185 ms. Remains : 297/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 262 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-07
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1024 reset in 544 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1012 reset in 614 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X p2), (X (NOT p2)), (X p1), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 380 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 11 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 152 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 4832 steps (44 resets) in 43 ms. (109 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X p2), (X (NOT p2)), (X p1), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (NOT p0)), (F p2)]
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 337 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 171 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 141 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 5 out of 297 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 297/297 places, 200/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 297 /297 variables (removed 0) and now considering 200/200 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 200 rows 297 cols
[2024-06-01 18:00:41] [INFO ] Computed 147 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-06-01 18:00:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 160 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 18:00:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 18:00:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 277 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 439 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 150 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 18:00:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 297/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 147/444 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
[2024-06-01 18:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 67 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 90 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 43 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 20/464 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
[2024-06-01 18:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 43 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 20/484 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
[2024-06-01 18:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 20/504 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
[2024-06-01 18:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 14/518 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 0/518 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 200/497 variables, 297/815 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/497 variables, 0/815 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/497 variables, 0/815 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 497/497 variables, and 815 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved in 11526 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 297/297 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 147/147 constraints, State Equation: 297/297 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 150/150 constraints, Known Traps: 74/74 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 297/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 147/444 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 74/518 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 0/518 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 200/497 variables, 297/815 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/497 variables, 150/965 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
[2024-06-01 18:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/497 variables, 1/966 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
[2024-06-01 18:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/497 variables, 1/967 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/497 variables, 0/967 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/497 variables, 0/967 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 497/497 variables, and 967 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved in 17375 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 297/297 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 147/147 constraints, State Equation: 297/297 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 150/150 constraints, Known Traps: 76/76 constraints]
After SMT, in 28945ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 28949ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 29399 ms. Remains : 297/297 places, 200/200 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (NOT p2)), (X p2), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 166 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 146 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 1539 steps (13 resets) in 24 ms. (61 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (NOT p2)), (X p2), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0)), (F (NOT p0)), (F p2)]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 285 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 170 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 145 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 153 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1032 reset in 534 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1040 reset in 583 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [false, true, true, true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 150 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 5 out of 297 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 297/297 places, 200/200 transitions.
Performed 47 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 47 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 297 transition count 200
Deduced a syphon composed of 47 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 47 rules in 40 ms. Remains 297 /297 variables (removed 0) and now considering 200/200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 18:01:13] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 6 ms returned []
Running 150 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 200 rows 297 cols
[2024-06-01 18:01:13] [INFO ] Computed 147 invariants in 2 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 297/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 147/444 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
[2024-06-01 18:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD20 is UNSAT
[2024-06-01 18:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD21 is UNSAT
[2024-06-01 18:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD28 is UNSAT
[2024-06-01 18:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD33 is UNSAT
[2024-06-01 18:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD34 is UNSAT
[2024-06-01 18:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD39 is UNSAT
[2024-06-01 18:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD40 is UNSAT
[2024-06-01 18:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD45 is UNSAT
[2024-06-01 18:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD46 is UNSAT
[2024-06-01 18:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD51 is UNSAT
[2024-06-01 18:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD52 is UNSAT
[2024-06-01 18:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD57 is UNSAT
[2024-06-01 18:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD58 is UNSAT
[2024-06-01 18:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD63 is UNSAT
[2024-06-01 18:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD64 is UNSAT
[2024-06-01 18:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD69 is UNSAT
[2024-06-01 18:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD70 is UNSAT
[2024-06-01 18:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD8 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD20 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD21 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD28 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD33 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD34 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD39 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD40 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD45 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD46 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD51 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD52 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD57 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD58 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD63 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD64 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD69 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD70 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD75 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 20/464 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 131 unsolved
[2024-06-01 18:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 313 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD76 is UNSAT
[2024-06-01 18:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD81 is UNSAT
[2024-06-01 18:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 72 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD82 is UNSAT
[2024-06-01 18:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 46 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD87 is UNSAT
[2024-06-01 18:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 57 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD88 is UNSAT
[2024-06-01 18:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD93 is UNSAT
[2024-06-01 18:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 14 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD94 is UNSAT
[2024-06-01 18:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD99 is UNSAT
[2024-06-01 18:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD100 is UNSAT
[2024-06-01 18:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD105 is UNSAT
[2024-06-01 18:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 71 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD106 is UNSAT
[2024-06-01 18:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD111 is UNSAT
[2024-06-01 18:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD112 is UNSAT
[2024-06-01 18:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 12 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD117 is UNSAT
[2024-06-01 18:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD118 is UNSAT
[2024-06-01 18:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 13 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD123 is UNSAT
[2024-06-01 18:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD124 is UNSAT
[2024-06-01 18:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 13 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD129 is UNSAT
[2024-06-01 18:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD130 is UNSAT
[2024-06-01 18:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD76 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD81 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD82 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD87 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD88 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD93 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD94 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD99 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD100 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD105 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD106 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD111 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD112 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD117 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD118 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD123 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD124 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD129 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD130 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD135 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 20/484 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 39 solved, 111 unsolved
[2024-06-01 18:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD142 is UNSAT
[2024-06-01 18:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD149 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 3/487 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 41 solved, 109 unsolved
[2024-06-01 18:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD150 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 1/488 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 42 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 0/488 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 42 solved, 108 unsolved
Problem TDEAD2 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD9 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD14 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 200/497 variables, 297/785 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 47 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/497 variables, 0/785 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 47 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/497 variables, 0/785 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 47 solved, 103 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 497/497 variables, and 785 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 47 solved, 103 unsolved in 10235 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 297/297 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 147/147 constraints, State Equation: 297/297 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 150/150 constraints, Known Traps: 44/44 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 47 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 250/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 47 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 55/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 47 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 44/349 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 47 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/349 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 47 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 47/297 variables, 92/441 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 47 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 47/488 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 47 solved, 103 unsolved
[2024-06-01 18:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 1/489 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 47 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 0/489 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 47 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 200/497 variables, 297/786 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 47 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/497 variables, 103/889 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 47 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/497 variables, 0/889 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 47 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/497 variables, 0/889 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 47 solved, 103 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 497/497 variables, and 889 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 47 solved, 103 unsolved in 8078 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 297/297 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 147/147 constraints, State Equation: 297/297 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 103/150 constraints, Known Traps: 45/45 constraints]
After SMT, in 18357ms problems are : Problem set: 47 solved, 103 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 47 dead transitions in 18362ms
Found 47 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 47 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 47 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 297/297 places, 153/200 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1119 edges and 297 vertex of which 250 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 47 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 47 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 10 ms. Remains 250 /297 variables (removed 47) and now considering 153/153 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 250/297 places, 153/200 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 18431 ms. Remains : 250/297 places, 153/200 transitions.
Support contains 5 out of 297 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 297/297 places, 200/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 297 /297 variables (removed 0) and now considering 200/200 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 200 rows 297 cols
[2024-06-01 18:01:31] [INFO ] Computed 147 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 18:01:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 225 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 18:01:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 18:01:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 274 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 518 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 150 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 18:01:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 297/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 147/444 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
[2024-06-01 18:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 20/464 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
[2024-06-01 18:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 20/484 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
[2024-06-01 18:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 14 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 20/504 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
[2024-06-01 18:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 14 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 14/518 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 0/518 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 200/497 variables, 297/815 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/497 variables, 0/815 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/497 variables, 0/815 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 497/497 variables, and 815 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved in 11114 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 297/297 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 147/147 constraints, State Equation: 297/297 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 150/150 constraints, Known Traps: 74/74 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 297/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 147/444 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 74/518 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 0/518 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 200/497 variables, 297/815 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/497 variables, 150/965 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
[2024-06-01 18:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/497 variables, 1/966 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
[2024-06-01 18:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/497 variables, 1/967 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/497 variables, 0/967 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/497 variables, 0/967 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 497/497 variables, and 967 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved in 17726 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 297/297 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 147/147 constraints, State Equation: 297/297 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 150/150 constraints, Known Traps: 76/76 constraints]
After SMT, in 28881ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 28883ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 29405 ms. Remains : 297/297 places, 200/200 transitions.
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-07 finished in 82733 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((p0 U X(p1))||G(p2)))'
Support contains 8 out of 298 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 298 /298 variables (removed 0) and now considering 200/200 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 200 rows 298 cols
[2024-06-01 18:02:01] [INFO ] Computed 148 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 18:02:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 168 ms returned [297]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 170 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 297/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 297 /297 variables (removed 0) and now considering 200/200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 175 ms. Remains : 297/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 234 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-08
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 92 steps with 0 reset in 2 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-08 finished in 430 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((X(G(p0))&&F(p1)))'
Support contains 6 out of 298 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 298 /298 variables (removed 0) and now considering 200/200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 18:02:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 18:02:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 169 ms returned [297]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 171 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 297/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 297 /297 variables (removed 0) and now considering 200/200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 177 ms. Remains : 297/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 130 ms :[(NOT p0), true, (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-10
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 12 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-10 finished in 323 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(!p0)&&F(G(p1)))))'
Support contains 4 out of 298 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Performed 46 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 46
Deduced a syphon composed of 46 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 46 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 92 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 252 transition count 154
Applied a total of 92 rules in 12 ms. Remains 252 /298 variables (removed 46) and now considering 154/200 (removed 46) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 154 rows 252 cols
[2024-06-01 18:02:01] [INFO ] Computed 148 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 18:02:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 163 ms returned [251]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 164 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 251/298 places, 154/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 251 /251 variables (removed 0) and now considering 154/154 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 182 ms. Remains : 251/298 places, 154/200 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 112 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) p0), p0, (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-11
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 210 steps with 3 reset in 4 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-11 finished in 312 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((G(F(p0))||(F(G(p1))&&F(p2)))))'
Support contains 7 out of 298 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 298 /298 variables (removed 0) and now considering 200/200 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 200 rows 298 cols
[2024-06-01 18:02:02] [INFO ] Computed 148 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-01 18:02:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 185 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 18:02:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 18:02:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 254 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 441 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 150 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 18:02:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 297/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 147/444 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
[2024-06-01 18:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 20/464 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
[2024-06-01 18:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 20/484 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
[2024-06-01 18:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 14 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 20/504 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
[2024-06-01 18:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 18:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 14/518 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 0/518 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/298 variables, 1/519 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 1/520 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 0/520 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 200/498 variables, 298/818 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/498 variables, 0/818 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/498 variables, 0/818 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 498/498 variables, and 818 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved in 12017 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 298/298 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 148/148 constraints, State Equation: 298/298 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 150/150 constraints, Known Traps: 74/74 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 297/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 147/444 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 74/518 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 0/518 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/298 variables, 1/519 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 1/520 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 0/520 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 200/498 variables, 298/818 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/498 variables, 150/968 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/498 variables, 0/968 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/498 variables, 0/968 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 498/498 variables, and 968 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved in 10602 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 298/298 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 148/148 constraints, State Equation: 298/298 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 150/150 constraints, Known Traps: 74/74 constraints]
After SMT, in 22640ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 150 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 22642ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 23088 ms. Remains : 298/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 263 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-13
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 1138 steps with 14 reset in 14 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-13 finished in 23394 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((X((X(G(p1)) U G(p1)))&&p0)))'
Support contains 3 out of 298 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 298/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 298 /298 variables (removed 0) and now considering 200/200 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 18:02:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 18:02:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 173 ms returned [297]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 187 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 297/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 297 /297 variables (removed 0) and now considering 200/200 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 192 ms. Remains : 297/298 places, 200/200 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 236 ms :[true, (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-14
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 3 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-14 finished in 441 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(F(p0))||(F(p1)&&X(p2))))'
[2024-06-01 18:02:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-06-01 18:02:26] [INFO ] Export to MCC of 1 properties in file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.sr.xml took 2 ms.
[2024-06-01 18:02:26] [INFO ] Export to PNML in file /home/mcc/execution/model.sr.pnml of net with 298 places, 200 transitions and 890 arcs took 5 ms.
Total runtime 112901 ms.
There are residual formulas that ITS could not solve within timeout
FORMULA ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT PARALLEL_PROCESSING USE_NUPN

BK_STOP 1717264946608

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -timeout 360 -rebuildPNML
mcc2024
ltl formula name ResAllocation-PT-R003C050-LTLFireability-07
ltl formula formula --ltl=/tmp/1842/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading model from model.pnml
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Edge label is id
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Petri net has 298 places, 200 transitions and 890 arcs
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Petri net Petri analyzed
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): There are no safe places
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading Petri net took 0.040 real 0.010 user 0.000 sys
pnml2lts-mc( 3/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/1842/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/1842/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 2/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/1842/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/1842/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): buchi has 6 states
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Weak Buchi automaton detected, adding non-accepting as progress label.
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): There are 300 state labels and 1 edge labels
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): State length is 299, there are 232 groups
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Running ufscc using 4 cores
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Using a tree table with 2^25 elements
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Successor permutation: dynamic
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Global bits: 0, count bits: 0, local bits: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 3/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 3/ 4): Accepting cycle FOUND at depth ~109!
pnml2lts-mc( 3/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): total scc count: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): unique states count: 409
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): unique transitions count: 18145
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - self-loop count: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim dead count: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim found count: 173
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim success count: 412
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - cum. max stack depth: 412
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Explored 412 states 18299 transitions, fanout: 44.415
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Total exploration time 0.140 sec (0.120 sec minimum, 0.127 sec on average)
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): States per second: 2943, Transitions per second: 130707
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Queue width: 12B, total height: 0, memory: 0.00MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Tree memory: 0.2MB, 14.0 B/state, compr.: 1.2%
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Tree fill ratio (roots/leafs): 0.0%/0.0%
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Stored 200 string chucks using 0MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Total memory used for chunk indexing: 0MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Est. total memory use: 0.2MB (~256.0MB paged-in)

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ResAllocation-PT-R003C050"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="ltsminxred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool ltsminxred"
echo " Input is ResAllocation-PT-R003C050, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r520-tall-171662339400828"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ResAllocation-PT-R003C050.tgz
mv ResAllocation-PT-R003C050 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;