Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r520-tall-171662339400818.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool ltsminxred
Input is ResAllocation-PT-R003C020, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r520-tall-171662339400818
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 616K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 59K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.5K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 45K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 23 07:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K Apr 23 07:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K Apr 23 07:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 23 07:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K Apr 11 23:18 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 140K Apr 11 23:18 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Apr 11 23:17 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 86K Apr 11 23:17 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K Apr 23 07:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 23 07:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 143K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1717264772115

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=ltsminxred
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ResAllocation-PT-R003C020
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Applying reductions before tool ltsmin
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-06-01 17:59:33] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -timeout, 360, -rebuildPNML]
[2024-06-01 17:59:33] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-06-01 17:59:33] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 78 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:33] [INFO ] Transformed 120 places.
[2024-06-01 17:59:33] [INFO ] Transformed 80 transitions.
[2024-06-01 17:59:33] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-06-01 17:59:33] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 120 places and 80 transitions and 354 arcs in 171 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 11 ms.
Support contains 101 out of 120 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 120/120 places, 80/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 120 /120 variables (removed 0) and now considering 80/80 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 120 cols
[2024-06-01 17:59:33] [INFO ] Computed 60 invariants in 13 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 212 ms returned [117]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 243 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 119/120 places, 80/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 119 /119 variables (removed 0) and now considering 80/80 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 271 ms. Remains : 119/120 places, 80/80 transitions.
Support contains 101 out of 119 places after structural reductions.
[2024-06-01 17:59:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 62 to 57
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (909 resets) in 1728 ms. (23 steps per ms) remains 3/57 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (64 resets) in 279 ms. (142 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 223 ms. (178 steps per ms) remains 2/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (23 resets) in 95 ms. (416 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 119 cols
[2024-06-01 17:59:34] [INFO ] Computed 59 invariants in 1 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp20 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 19/27 variables, 11/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 19/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 16/43 variables, 9/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 16/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 12/55 variables, 6/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 12/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
[2024-06-01 17:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 1/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 11/66 variables, 6/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 11/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 10/76 variables, 5/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 10/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 9/85 variables, 5/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 9/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 8/93 variables, 4/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 8/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
[2024-06-01 17:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 1/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 8/101 variables, 4/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 8/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
[2024-06-01 17:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 1/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (OVERLAPS) 6/107 variables, 3/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 6/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (OVERLAPS) 4/111 variables, 2/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 4/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
[2024-06-01 17:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 1/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (OVERLAPS) 2/113 variables, 1/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 37 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 2/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 38 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 39 (OVERLAPS) 2/115 variables, 1/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 40 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 2/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 41 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 42 (OVERLAPS) 2/117 variables, 1/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 43 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 2/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 44 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 45 (OVERLAPS) 2/119 variables, 1/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 46 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 2/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 47 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 48 (OVERLAPS) 80/199 variables, 119/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 49 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 50 (OVERLAPS) 0/199 variables, 0/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 199/199 variables, and 301 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved in 655 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 119/119 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 59/59 constraints, State Equation: 119/119 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 8/10 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 8/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 7/17 variables, 4/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 7/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 4/21 variables, 2/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 4/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 3/24 variables, 2/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 3/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 2/26 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 2/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 2/28 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 2/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 2/30 variables, 1/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 2/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 2/32 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 2/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 2/34 variables, 1/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 2/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (OVERLAPS) 2/36 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 2/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (OVERLAPS) 2/38 variables, 1/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 2/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (OVERLAPS) 2/40 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 2/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 37 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 38 (OVERLAPS) 40/80 variables, 40/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 39 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 40 (OVERLAPS) 59/139 variables, 39/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 41 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 39/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 42 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 19/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 43 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 1/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 44 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 4/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 45 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 46 (OVERLAPS) 60/199 variables, 40/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 47 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 40/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 48 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 20/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 49 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 50 (OVERLAPS) 0/199 variables, 0/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 199/199 variables, and 302 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved in 209 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 119/119 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 59/59 constraints, State Equation: 119/119 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/2 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 892ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 17 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=17 )
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 5 ms.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2024-06-01 17:59:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 119 /119 variables (removed 0) and now considering 80/80 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5 ms. Remains : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
[2024-06-01 17:59:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 119 /119 variables (removed 0) and now considering 80/80 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5 ms. Remains : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
[2024-06-01 17:59:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 119 /119 variables (removed 0) and now considering 80/80 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
[2024-06-01 17:59:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 119 /119 variables (removed 0) and now considering 80/80 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 119 /119 variables (removed 0) and now considering 80/80 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 119 /119 variables (removed 0) and now considering 80/80 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6 ms. Remains : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 119 /119 variables (removed 0) and now considering 80/80 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 119 /119 variables (removed 0) and now considering 80/80 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 119 /119 variables (removed 0) and now considering 80/80 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 107 transition count 68
Applied a total of 24 rules in 17 ms. Remains 107 /119 variables (removed 12) and now considering 68/80 (removed 12) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 17 ms. Remains : 107/119 places, 68/80 transitions.
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 68 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 119 /119 variables (removed 0) and now considering 80/80 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1 ms. Remains : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Performed 18 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 18
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 100 transition count 62
Applied a total of 37 rules in 7 ms. Remains 100 /119 variables (removed 19) and now considering 62/80 (removed 18) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7 ms. Remains : 100/119 places, 62/80 transitions.
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 62 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 119 /119 variables (removed 0) and now considering 80/80 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1 ms. Remains : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 119 /119 variables (removed 0) and now considering 80/80 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Performed 19 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 19
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 99 transition count 61
Applied a total of 39 rules in 7 ms. Remains 99 /119 variables (removed 20) and now considering 61/80 (removed 19) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7 ms. Remains : 99/119 places, 61/80 transitions.
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 61 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 119 /119 variables (removed 0) and now considering 80/80 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1 ms. Remains : 119/119 places, 80/80 transitions.
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Export to MCC of 16 properties in file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.sr.xml took 15 ms.
[2024-06-01 17:59:36] [INFO ] Export to PNML in file /home/mcc/execution/model.sr.pnml of net with 119 places, 80 transitions and 352 arcs took 4 ms.
Total runtime 3307 ms.
There are residual formulas that ITS could not solve within timeout
Usage: pnml2lts-sym [-gvqh] [--order=]
[--mu-opt] [--saturation=]
[--sat-granularity=] [--save-sat-levels]
[--guidance=] [-d|--deadlock]
[--action=] [-i|--invariant=STRING] [-n|--no-exit]
[--trace=] [--type=]
[--mu=.mu] [--ctl-star=.ctl]
[--ctl=.ctl] [--ltl=.ltl] [--dot=STRING]
[--save-levels=STRING] [--pg-solve] [--attr=]
[--saturating-attractor] [--write-strategy=.spg]
[--check-strategy] [--interactive-play] [--player]
[--pg-write=.spg] [--no-matrix] [--noack=<1|2>]
[--edge-label=] [--labels] [-m|--matrix]
[--mucalc=.mcf|] [-c|--cache]
[--allow-undefined-edges] [--allow-undefined-values]
[-p|--por= (default: heur)]
[--weak=[valmari] (default: uses stronger left-commutativity)]
[--leap] [-r|--regroup=<(T,)+>] [--sloan-w1=] [--sloan-w2=]
[--cw-max-cols=] [--cw-max-rows=] [--col-ins=<(C.C',)+>]
[--mh-timeout=] [--row-perm=<(R,)+>] [--col-perm=<(C,)+>]
[--graph-metrics] [--regroup-exit] [--regroup-time]
[-g|--pins-guards] [--vset=] [--ldd32-step=]
[--ldd32-cache=] [--ldd-step=] [--ldd-cache=]
[--cache-ratio=] [--max-increase=]
[--min-free-nodes=] [--fdd-bits=]
[--fdd-reorder=]
[--vset-cache-diff=] [--no-soundness-check] [--precise]
[--next-union] [--peak-nodes] [--maxsum=]
[--block-size=] [--cluster-size=] [-v] [-q]
[--debug=] [--stats] [--where] [--when]
[--timeout=INT] [--version] [-h|--help] [--usage]
[OPTIONS] []
Could not compute solution for formula : ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2024-00
Could not compute solution for formula : ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2024-01
Could not compute solution for formula : ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2024-02
Could not compute solution for formula : ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2024-03
Could not compute solution for formula : ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2024-04
Could not compute solution for formula : ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2024-05
Could not compute solution for formula : ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2024-06
Could not compute solution for formula : ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2024-07
Could not compute solution for formula : ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2024-08
Could not compute solution for formula : ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2024-09
Could not compute solution for formula : ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2024-10
Could not compute solution for formula : ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2024-11
Could not compute solution for formula : ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2023-12
Could not compute solution for formula : ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2023-13
Could not compute solution for formula : ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2023-14
Could not compute solution for formula : ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2023-15

BK_STOP 1717264776843

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -timeout 360 -rebuildPNML
mcc2024
ctl formula name ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2024-00
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/505/ctl_0_
ctl formula name ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2024-01
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/505/ctl_1_
ctl formula name ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2024-02
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/505/ctl_2_
ctl formula name ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2024-03
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/505/ctl_3_
ctl formula name ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2024-04
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/505/ctl_4_
ctl formula name ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2024-05
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/505/ctl_5_
ctl formula name ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2024-06
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/505/ctl_6_
ctl formula name ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2024-07
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/505/ctl_7_
ctl formula name ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2024-08
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/505/ctl_8_
ctl formula name ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2024-09
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/505/ctl_9_
ctl formula name ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2024-10
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/505/ctl_10_
ctl formula name ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2024-11
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/505/ctl_11_
ctl formula name ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2023-12
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/505/ctl_12_
ctl formula name ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2023-13
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/505/ctl_13_
ctl formula name ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2023-14
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/505/ctl_14_
ctl formula name ResAllocation-PT-R003C020-CTLFireability-2023-15
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/505/ctl_15_
pnml2lts-sym, ** error **: unknown vector set implementation lddmc

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ResAllocation-PT-R003C020"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="ltsminxred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool ltsminxred"
echo " Input is ResAllocation-PT-R003C020, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r520-tall-171662339400818"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ResAllocation-PT-R003C020.tgz
mv ResAllocation-PT-R003C020 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;