fond
Model Checking Contest 2024
14th edition, Geneva, Switzerland, June 25, 2024
Execution of r512-smll-171654407000164
Last Updated
July 7, 2024

About the Execution of LTSMin+red for PermAdmissibility-PT-02

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
1252.951 660190.00 1898373.00 1064.20 FFFTFFFFFFFFFTFF normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r512-smll-171654407000164.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool ltsminxred
Input is PermAdmissibility-PT-02, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r512-smll-171654407000164
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 1.8M
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Apr 12 09:11 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 102K Apr 12 09:11 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 52K Apr 12 09:09 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 268K Apr 12 09:09 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.7K Apr 23 07:42 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K Apr 23 07:42 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 23 07:42 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 72K Apr 23 07:42 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 12 09:18 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 154K Apr 12 09:18 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 113K Apr 12 09:17 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 575K Apr 12 09:17 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.9K Apr 23 07:42 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.4K Apr 23 07:42 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 336K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1717254274205

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=ltsminxred
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=PermAdmissibility-PT-02
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Applying reductions before tool ltsmin
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-06-01 15:04:36] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -timeout, 360, -rebuildPNML]
[2024-06-01 15:04:36] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-06-01 15:04:37] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 238 ms
[2024-06-01 15:04:37] [INFO ] Transformed 168 places.
[2024-06-01 15:04:37] [INFO ] Transformed 592 transitions.
[2024-06-01 15:04:37] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 168 places and 592 transitions and 3456 arcs in 584 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 42 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 101 out of 168 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 168/168 places, 592/592 transitions.
Reduce places removed 64 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 104 transition count 592
Applied a total of 64 rules in 98 ms. Remains 104 /168 variables (removed 64) and now considering 592/592 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 592 rows 104 cols
[2024-06-01 15:04:38] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 62 ms
[2024-06-01 15:04:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 390 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 15:04:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 15:04:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 465 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 923 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 588 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 15:04:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 588 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 588 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/104 variables, 13/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 588 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 588 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 592/696 variables, 104/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 588 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/696 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 588 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/696 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 588 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 696/696 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 588 unsolved in 30044 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 16/16 constraints, State Equation: 104/104 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 588/588 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 588 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 588 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 588 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/104 variables, 13/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 588 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 588 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 592/696 variables, 104/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 588 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/696 variables, 588/708 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 588 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 696/696 variables, and 708 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 588 unsolved in 30027 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 16/16 constraints, State Equation: 104/104 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 588/588 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 62287ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 588 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 62334ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/168 places, 592/592 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 63405 ms. Remains : 104/168 places, 592/592 transitions.
Support contains 101 out of 104 places after structural reductions.
[2024-06-01 15:05:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 177 ms
[2024-06-01 15:05:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 156 ms
[2024-06-01 15:05:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 592 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 30 to 28
RANDOM walk for 40001 steps (852 resets) in 997 ms. (40 steps per ms) remains 2/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4342 steps (18 resets) in 67 ms. (63 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
Computed a total of 104 stabilizing places and 592 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 104 transition count 592
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G(p0)))'
Support contains 34 out of 104 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 592/592 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 91 transition count 468
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 91 transition count 468
Applied a total of 26 rules in 27 ms. Remains 91 /104 variables (removed 13) and now considering 468/592 (removed 124) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 468 rows 91 cols
[2024-06-01 15:05:43] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 14 ms
[2024-06-01 15:05:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 206 ms returned [18]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 210 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 90/104 places, 468/592 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 90 /90 variables (removed 0) and now considering 468/468 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 245 ms. Remains : 90/104 places, 468/592 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 355 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-00
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 2 ms.
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-00 finished in 811 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((!p0&&G(((F(p2)&&X(X(F(p0))))||p1)))))'
Support contains 26 out of 104 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 592/592 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 975 edges and 104 vertex of which 86 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 18 places using SCC suffix rule.8 ms
Discarding 18 places :
Also discarding 128 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 128 transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 73 ms. Remains 86 /104 variables (removed 18) and now considering 464/592 (removed 128) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 464 rows 86 cols
[2024-06-01 15:05:44] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 11 ms
[2024-06-01 15:05:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 207 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 15:05:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 15:05:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 939 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1152 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 15:05:45] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 44 ms returned []
Running 460 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 15:05:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/86 variables, 9/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 464/550 variables, 86/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/550 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/550 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 550/550 variables, and 100 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved in 17796 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 14/14 constraints, State Equation: 86/86 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 460/460 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/86 variables, 9/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 464/550 variables, 86/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/550 variables, 460/560 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 550/550 variables, and 560 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 14/14 constraints, State Equation: 86/86 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 460/460 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 49351ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 49361ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 86/104 places, 464/592 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 50649 ms. Remains : 86/104 places, 464/592 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 402 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) p0), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND p0 (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-01
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 86 steps with 3 reset in 16 ms.
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-01 finished in 51113 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F((p0&&(X(G(p2))||p1)))))'
Support contains 31 out of 104 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 592/592 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 78 transition count 344
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 78 transition count 344
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 64 transition count 218
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 64 transition count 218
Applied a total of 80 rules in 22 ms. Remains 64 /104 variables (removed 40) and now considering 218/592 (removed 374) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 218 rows 64 cols
[2024-06-01 15:06:35] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 6 ms
[2024-06-01 15:06:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 140 ms returned [0, 5, 19, 30]
[2024-06-01 15:06:35] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [0, 5, 19]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 149 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 61/104 places, 218/592 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 61 /61 variables (removed 0) and now considering 218/218 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 174 ms. Remains : 61/104 places, 218/592 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 200 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-02
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 39 steps with 1 reset in 4 ms.
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-02 finished in 404 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((G(p1)||p0)))'
Support contains 26 out of 104 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 592/592 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 91 transition count 468
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 91 transition count 468
Applied a total of 26 rules in 56 ms. Remains 91 /104 variables (removed 13) and now considering 468/592 (removed 124) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 468 rows 91 cols
[2024-06-01 15:06:35] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 9 ms
[2024-06-01 15:06:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 205 ms returned [18]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 207 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 90/104 places, 468/592 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 27 ms. Remains 90 /90 variables (removed 0) and now considering 468/468 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 292 ms. Remains : 90/104 places, 468/592 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 53 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-03
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4417 reset in 1412 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4421 reset in 968 ms.
Computed a total of 90 stabilizing places and 468 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 90 transition count 468
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 11 factoid took 283 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 2 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 51 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 160 steps (0 resets) in 9 ms. (16 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p1), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 11 factoid took 636 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 2 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 49 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 51 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
// Phase 1: matrix 468 rows 90 cols
[2024-06-01 15:06:39] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-06-01 15:06:41] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 15 generalized place invariants in 16 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 15:06:41] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 331 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 15:06:41] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-06-01 15:06:43] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 0 positive and 15 generalized place invariants in 34 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 15:06:43] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 247 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 15:06:43] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 28/176/28 causal constraints (skipped 436 transitions) in 138 ms.
[2024-06-01 15:06:43] [INFO ] Added : 5 causal constraints over 2 iterations in 303 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))
Support contains 26 out of 90 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 90/90 places, 468/468 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 26 ms. Remains 90 /90 variables (removed 0) and now considering 468/468 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 15:06:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 15:06:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 192 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 15:06:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 15:06:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 939 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1137 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 15:06:44] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 17 ms returned []
Running 464 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 15:06:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/90 variables, 7/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 468/558 variables, 90/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/558 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/558 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 558/558 variables, and 105 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved in 24571 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 90/90 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 464/464 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/90 variables, 7/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 468/558 variables, 90/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/558 variables, 464/569 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 558/558 variables, and 569 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 90/90 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 464/464 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 55813ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 55824ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 57014 ms. Remains : 90/90 places, 468/468 transitions.
Computed a total of 90 stabilizing places and 468 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 90 transition count 468
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 11 factoid took 191 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 2 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 34 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 153 steps (0 resets) in 6 ms. (21 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p1), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 11 factoid took 637 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 2 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 49 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 49 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
[2024-06-01 15:07:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 15:07:43] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 15 generalized place invariants in 17 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 15:07:43] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 321 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 15:07:43] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-06-01 15:07:45] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 0 positive and 15 generalized place invariants in 26 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 15:07:45] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 313 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 15:07:45] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 28/176/28 causal constraints (skipped 436 transitions) in 78 ms.
[2024-06-01 15:07:45] [INFO ] Added : 5 causal constraints over 1 iterations in 196 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 56 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4415 reset in 1702 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4421 reset in 1238 ms.
Support contains 26 out of 90 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 90/90 places, 468/468 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 26 ms. Remains 90 /90 variables (removed 0) and now considering 468/468 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 15:07:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 15:07:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 171 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 15:07:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 15:07:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 959 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1134 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 15:07:49] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 8 ms returned []
Running 464 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 15:07:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/90 variables, 7/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 468/558 variables, 90/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/558 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/558 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 558/558 variables, and 105 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved in 26350 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 90/90 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 464/464 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/90 variables, 7/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 468/558 variables, 90/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/558 variables, 464/569 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 558/558 variables, and 569 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 90/90 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 464/464 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 57545ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 57555ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 58733 ms. Remains : 90/90 places, 468/468 transitions.
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-03 finished in 132096 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G(p0)))'
Support contains 5 out of 104 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 592/592 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 78 transition count 344
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 78 transition count 344
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 76 place count 54 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 54 transition count 108
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 103 place count 51 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 51 transition count 84
Applied a total of 106 rules in 14 ms. Remains 51 /104 variables (removed 53) and now considering 84/592 (removed 508) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 51 cols
[2024-06-01 15:08:47] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 15:08:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned [0, 5, 18, 25]
[2024-06-01 15:08:47] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [0, 5, 18]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 80 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 48/104 places, 84/592 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 48 /48 variables (removed 0) and now considering 84/84 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 95 ms. Remains : 48/104 places, 84/592 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 83 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-04
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-04 finished in 196 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(!p0) U (!p1&&X(!p2)))))'
Support contains 31 out of 104 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 592/592 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 91 transition count 468
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 91 transition count 468
Applied a total of 26 rules in 6 ms. Remains 91 /104 variables (removed 13) and now considering 468/592 (removed 124) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 468 rows 91 cols
[2024-06-01 15:08:47] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-06-01 15:08:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 120 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 123 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 90/104 places, 468/592 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 90 /90 variables (removed 0) and now considering 468/468 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 131 ms. Remains : 90/104 places, 468/592 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 228 ms :[(OR p1 p2), p0, (OR p1 p2), p2, (AND p0 (NOT p1) p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-05
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5462 reset in 1002 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5467 reset in 852 ms.
Computed a total of 90 stabilizing places and 468 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 90 transition count 468
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 p0 (NOT p2)), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0 p2))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X (NOT (AND p1 p0 p2))), (X (NOT (AND p1 p2))), (X (AND p1 p0)), (X p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p2))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0 p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p0 p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p2)))), (X (X (AND p1 p0))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p2)))), (X (X p1)), (F (G p1)), (F (G p0)), (F (G (NOT p2)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 22 factoid took 173 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 15 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 6 states, 17 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 293 ms :[(OR p2 p1), p0, (OR p2 p1), p2, false, false]
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 9 to 8
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (851 resets) in 1044 ms. (38 steps per ms) remains 2/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (204 resets) in 1705 ms. (23 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (230 resets) in 1285 ms. (31 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 468 rows 90 cols
[2024-06-01 15:08:51] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 4 ms
Problem apf3 is UNSAT
Problem apf5 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 31/558 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved in 36 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 0/15 constraints, State Equation: 0/90 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 332ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Found 2 invariant AP formulas.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 p0 (NOT p2)), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0 p2))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X (NOT (AND p1 p0 p2))), (X (NOT (AND p1 p2))), (X (AND p1 p0)), (X p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p2))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0 p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p0 p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p2)))), (X (X (AND p1 p0))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p2)))), (X (X p1)), (F (G p1)), (F (G p0)), (F (G (NOT p2))), (G (OR (NOT p0) p2 p1)), (G (OR p0 p2 p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT p0)), (F p2), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (OR (AND p0 p2) (AND p0 p1)))), (F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p2) p1)))]
Property proved to be false thanks to negative knowledge :(F (NOT (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))
Knowledge based reduction with 24 factoid took 268 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 17 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-05 finished in 4743 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((X(F(p0))&&G((p1&&F(p2))))))'
Support contains 43 out of 104 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 592/592 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 91 transition count 468
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 91 transition count 468
Applied a total of 26 rules in 6 ms. Remains 91 /104 variables (removed 13) and now considering 468/592 (removed 124) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 468 rows 91 cols
[2024-06-01 15:08:52] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 7 ms
[2024-06-01 15:08:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 183 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 192 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 90/104 places, 468/592 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 90 /90 variables (removed 0) and now considering 468/468 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 202 ms. Remains : 90/104 places, 468/592 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 238 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0), (NOT p2), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-07
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 32 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-07 finished in 468 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 3 out of 104 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 592/592 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 80 transition count 352
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 80 transition count 352
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 60 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 60 transition count 136
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 89 place count 59 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 59 transition count 128
Applied a total of 90 rules in 26 ms. Remains 59 /104 variables (removed 45) and now considering 128/592 (removed 464) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 128 rows 59 cols
[2024-06-01 15:08:53] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-01 15:08:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 141 ms returned [7]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 143 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 58/104 places, 128/592 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 58 /58 variables (removed 0) and now considering 128/128 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 177 ms. Remains : 58/104 places, 128/592 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 102 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-08
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 32 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-08 finished in 297 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F((X(p1)&&p0))))'
Support contains 6 out of 104 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 592/592 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 78 transition count 344
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 78 transition count 344
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 56 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 56 transition count 114
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 97 place count 55 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 55 transition count 106
Applied a total of 98 rules in 9 ms. Remains 55 /104 variables (removed 49) and now considering 106/592 (removed 486) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 106 rows 55 cols
[2024-06-01 15:08:53] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-01 15:08:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 124 ms returned [0, 5]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 130 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 53/104 places, 106/592 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 53 /53 variables (removed 0) and now considering 106/106 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 140 ms. Remains : 53/104 places, 106/592 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 162 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-09
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 32 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-09 finished in 323 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((F(p0) U p1)||G(!p0)))'
Support contains 6 out of 104 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 592/592 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 975 edges and 104 vertex of which 50 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 54 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 54 places :
Also discarding 384 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 384 transitions
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 38 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 38 transition count 88
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 34 transition count 58
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 34 transition count 58
Applied a total of 33 rules in 12 ms. Remains 34 /104 variables (removed 70) and now considering 58/592 (removed 534) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 58 rows 34 cols
[2024-06-01 15:08:53] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 15:08:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 15:08:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 15:08:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 125 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 199 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 15:08:53] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 54 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 15:08:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/34 variables, 9/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 58/92 variables, 34/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/92 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 92/92 variables, and 44 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 1144 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 34/34 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/34 variables, 9/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 58/92 variables, 34/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 54/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/92 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 92/92 variables, and 98 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 2041 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/10 constraints, State Equation: 34/34 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3220ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3222ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 34/104 places, 58/592 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3440 ms. Remains : 34/104 places, 58/592 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 213 ms :[(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-10
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 1068 steps with 75 reset in 6 ms.
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-10 finished in 3678 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((p0||(!p1&&G(!p2))) U X(X(p2))))'
Support contains 6 out of 104 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 592/592 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 78 transition count 344
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 78 transition count 344
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 76 place count 54 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 54 transition count 108
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 102 place count 52 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 52 transition count 92
Applied a total of 104 rules in 7 ms. Remains 52 /104 variables (removed 52) and now considering 92/592 (removed 500) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 52 cols
[2024-06-01 15:08:57] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 15:08:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 130 ms returned [0, 5, 18, 25]
[2024-06-01 15:08:57] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [0, 5, 18]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 132 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/104 places, 92/592 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 49 /49 variables (removed 0) and now considering 92/92 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 140 ms. Remains : 49/104 places, 92/592 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 303 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), true, (NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-11
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-11 finished in 469 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((X(p1)&&p0)))'
Support contains 3 out of 104 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 592/592 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 78 transition count 344
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 78 transition count 344
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 76 place count 54 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 54 transition count 108
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 102 place count 52 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 52 transition count 92
Applied a total of 104 rules in 7 ms. Remains 52 /104 variables (removed 52) and now considering 92/592 (removed 500) transitions.
[2024-06-01 15:08:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 15:08:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 117 ms returned [0, 5, 18, 25]
[2024-06-01 15:08:57] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [0, 5, 18]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 119 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/104 places, 92/592 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 49 /49 variables (removed 0) and now considering 92/92 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 128 ms. Remains : 49/104 places, 92/592 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 122 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-12
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 32 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-12 finished in 268 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 3 out of 104 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 592/592 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 80 transition count 352
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 80 transition count 352
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 60 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 60 transition count 136
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 90 place count 58 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 58 transition count 120
Applied a total of 92 rules in 25 ms. Remains 58 /104 variables (removed 46) and now considering 120/592 (removed 472) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 120 rows 58 cols
[2024-06-01 15:08:58] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 15:08:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 178 ms returned [7]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 179 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 57/104 places, 120/592 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 57 /57 variables (removed 0) and now considering 120/120 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 210 ms. Remains : 57/104 places, 120/592 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 66 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-13
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3030 reset in 350 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3030 reset in 352 ms.
Computed a total of 57 stabilizing places and 120 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 57 transition count 120
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0)), (F (G p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 21 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-13 finished in 1109 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((F(p0)&&G(p1))))'
Support contains 9 out of 104 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 592/592 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 78 transition count 344
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 78 transition count 344
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 55 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 55 transition count 114
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 100 place count 53 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 53 transition count 98
Applied a total of 102 rules in 4 ms. Remains 53 /104 variables (removed 51) and now considering 98/592 (removed 494) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 53 cols
[2024-06-01 15:08:59] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-01 15:08:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 153 ms returned [0, 5, 18, 25]
[2024-06-01 15:08:59] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [0, 5, 18]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 156 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 50/104 places, 98/592 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 50 /50 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 161 ms. Remains : 50/104 places, 98/592 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 147 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), true, (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-14
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-14 finished in 343 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((X((p0 U p1)) U (G(p2) U p3)))'
Support contains 12 out of 104 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 104/104 places, 592/592 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 80 transition count 352
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 80 transition count 352
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 62 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 62 transition count 146
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 85 place count 61 transition count 138
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 61 transition count 138
Applied a total of 86 rules in 4 ms. Remains 61 /104 variables (removed 43) and now considering 138/592 (removed 454) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 138 rows 61 cols
[2024-06-01 15:08:59] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-01 15:08:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 95 ms returned [7]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 96 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/104 places, 138/592 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 138/138 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 101 ms. Remains : 60/104 places, 138/592 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 359 ms :[(NOT p3), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), false, true, (NOT p2), (OR (AND p1 (NOT p3)) (AND p0 (NOT p3)))]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-15
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-15 finished in 494 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((G(p1)||p0)))'
[2024-06-01 15:09:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 110 ms
[2024-06-01 15:09:00] [INFO ] Export to MCC of 1 properties in file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.sr.xml took 5 ms.
[2024-06-01 15:09:00] [INFO ] Export to PNML in file /home/mcc/execution/model.sr.pnml of net with 104 places, 592 transitions and 2944 arcs took 11 ms.
Total runtime 263788 ms.
There are residual formulas that ITS could not solve within timeout
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT PARALLEL_PROCESSING USE_NUPN

BK_STOP 1717254934395

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -timeout 360 -rebuildPNML
mcc2024
ltl formula name PermAdmissibility-PT-02-LTLFireability-03
ltl formula formula --ltl=/tmp/1067/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading model from model.pnml
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Edge label is id
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Petri net has 104 places, 592 transitions and 2944 arcs
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Petri net Petri analyzed
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): There are no safe places
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading Petri net took 0.110 real 0.030 user 0.040 sys
pnml2lts-mc( 3/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/1067/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/1067/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/1067/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 2/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/1067/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): buchi has 2 states
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): There are 105 state labels and 1 edge labels
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): State length is 105, there are 706 groups
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Running ufscc using 4 cores
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Using a tree table with 2^25 elements
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Successor permutation: dynamic
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Global bits: 0, count bits: 0, local bits: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): ~28 levels ~10000 states ~51548 transitions
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): ~28 levels ~20000 states ~106232 transitions
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): ~28 levels ~40000 states ~374628 transitions
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4): ~28 levels ~80000 states ~867580 transitions
pnml2lts-mc( 2/ 4): ~28 levels ~160000 states ~1637296 transitions
pnml2lts-mc( 2/ 4): ~28 levels ~320000 states ~3319960 transitions
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4): ~28 levels ~640000 states ~6966952 transitions
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4): ~28 levels ~1280000 states ~13639588 transitions
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4): ~28 levels ~2560000 states ~27390100 transitions
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): ~28 levels ~5120000 states ~55159600 transitions
pnml2lts-mc( 2/ 4): ~28 levels ~10240000 states ~111716228 transitions
pnml2lts-mc( 2/ 4): ~28 levels ~20480000 states ~223542112 transitions
pnml2lts-mc( 3/ 4): Error: tree roots table full! Change -s/--ratio.
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): total scc count: 33554012
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): unique states count: 33554095
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): unique transitions count: 374830919
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - self-loop count: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim dead count: 341274578
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim found count: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim success count: 33554100
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - cum. max stack depth: 112
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Explored 33554100 states 374831073 transitions, fanout: 11.171
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Total exploration time 392.520 sec (392.350 sec minimum, 392.438 sec on average)
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): States per second: 85484, Transitions per second: 954935
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Queue width: 12B, total height: 0, memory: 0.00MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Tree memory: 284.6MB, 8.9 B/state, compr.: 2.1%
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Tree fill ratio (roots/leafs): 99.0%/44.0%
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Stored 604 string chucks using 0MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Total memory used for chunk indexing: 0MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Est. total memory use: 284.6MB (~256.0MB paged-in)

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="PermAdmissibility-PT-02"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="ltsminxred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool ltsminxred"
echo " Input is PermAdmissibility-PT-02, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r512-smll-171654407000164"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/PermAdmissibility-PT-02.tgz
mv PermAdmissibility-PT-02 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;