About the Execution of LTSMin+red for PermAdmissibility-COL-20
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
541.460 | 15008.00 | 26810.00 | 278.70 | FT??FF?TFTT????? | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r512-smll-171654407000139.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool ltsminxred
Input is PermAdmissibility-COL-20, examination is LTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r512-smll-171654407000139
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 552K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.5K Apr 12 09:05 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 111K Apr 12 09:05 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.9K Apr 12 09:03 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 38K Apr 12 09:03 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 23 07:42 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K Apr 23 07:42 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.5K Apr 23 07:42 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 23 07:42 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K Apr 12 09:13 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 133K Apr 12 09:13 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.7K Apr 12 09:12 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 66K Apr 12 09:12 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Apr 23 07:42 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 23 07:42 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 54K May 18 16:43 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-00
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-01
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-02
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-03
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-04
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-05
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-06
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-07
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-08
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-09
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1717251947170
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=ltsminxred
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=PermAdmissibility-COL-20
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Applying reductions before tool ltsmin
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-06-01 14:25:48] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLCardinality, -timeout, 360, -rebuildPNML]
[2024-06-01 14:25:48] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-06-01 14:25:49] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2024-06-01 14:25:49] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2024-06-01 14:25:50] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 1021 ms
[2024-06-01 14:25:50] [INFO ] Imported 40 HL places and 16 HL transitions for a total of 208 PT places and 1024.0 transition bindings in 28 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLCardinality.xml in 22 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
[2024-06-01 14:25:50] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 40 places and 16 transitions 83 arcs in 6 ms.
[2024-06-01 14:25:50] [INFO ] Skeletonized 16 HLPN properties in 3 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 3 formulas.
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Computed a total of 40 stabilizing places and 16 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 40 transition count 16
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Remains 13 properties that can be checked using skeleton over-approximation.
Computed a total of 40 stabilizing places and 16 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 40 transition count 16
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
RANDOM walk for 40020 steps (116 resets) in 353 ms. (113 steps per ms) remains 1/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (28 resets) in 150 ms. (264 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 16 rows 40 cols
[2024-06-01 14:25:50] [INFO ] Computed 24 invariants in 6 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp18 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 26/56 variables, and 10 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 204 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 10/24 constraints, State Equation: 0/40 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 250ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 13 simplifications.
[2024-06-01 14:25:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2024-06-01 14:25:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial and guards and successors and join/free detected :input
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial detected :input
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial and guards detected :input
Applying symmetric unfolding of full symmetric sort :input domain size was 8
[2024-06-01 14:25:51] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 40 places and 16 transitions 83 arcs in 14 ms.
[2024-06-01 14:25:51] [INFO ] Unfolded 13 HLPN properties in 0 ms.
Support contains 30 out of 40 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 40/40 places, 16/16 transitions.
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 37 transition count 16
Applied a total of 3 rules in 18 ms. Remains 37 /40 variables (removed 3) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 16 rows 37 cols
[2024-06-01 14:25:51] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 9 ms
[2024-06-01 14:25:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 111 ms returned [7, 17, 20, 27]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 126 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 33/40 places, 16/16 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 33 /33 variables (removed 0) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 161 ms. Remains : 33/40 places, 16/16 transitions.
Support contains 30 out of 33 places after structural reductions.
[2024-06-01 14:25:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 14:25:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-01 14:25:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 16 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40026 steps (116 resets) in 49 ms. (800 steps per ms) remains 1/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (28 resets) in 137 ms. (289 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 16 rows 33 cols
[2024-06-01 14:25:51] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 4 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp18 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 22/49 variables, and 6 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 38 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/17 constraints, State Equation: 0/33 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 48ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 13 simplifications.
Computed a total of 33 stabilizing places and 16 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 33 transition count 16
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G((!p0 U (p1 U (p1&&G(p2)))))))'
Support contains 4 out of 33 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 33/33 places, 16/16 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 27 transition count 16
Applied a total of 6 rules in 6 ms. Remains 27 /33 variables (removed 6) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 16 rows 27 cols
[2024-06-01 14:25:51] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 14:25:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 78 ms returned [4, 5, 6, 11, 13, 14, 19, 20, 22]
[2024-06-01 14:25:51] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [4, 5, 11, 13, 14, 19, 20]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 80 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 20/33 places, 16/16 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 20 /20 variables (removed 0) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 88 ms. Remains : 20/33 places, 16/16 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 521 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), true, (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-00
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-00 finished in 704 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X((p0||G(F(p1))||G(p2)))))'
Support contains 5 out of 33 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 33/33 places, 16/16 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 27 transition count 16
Applied a total of 6 rules in 1 ms. Remains 27 /33 variables (removed 6) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 16 rows 27 cols
[2024-06-01 14:25:52] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 14:25:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 75 ms returned [4, 5, 6, 11, 12, 13, 14, 19, 22]
[2024-06-01 14:25:52] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [4, 5, 11, 12, 13, 14, 19]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 77 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 20/33 places, 16/16 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 20 /20 variables (removed 0) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 79 ms. Remains : 20/33 places, 16/16 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 223 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-01
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 262 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 158 ms.
Computed a total of 20 stabilizing places and 16 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 20 transition count 16
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0)))), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1)))), (F (OR (G p2) (G (NOT p2))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 23 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 11 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-01 finished in 828 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 33 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 33/33 places, 16/16 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 70 edges and 33 vertex of which 29 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 4 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 4 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Applied a total of 1 rules in 11 ms. Remains 27 /33 variables (removed 6) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 16 rows 27 cols
[2024-06-01 14:25:53] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 14:25:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned [4, 5, 6, 11, 12, 13, 14, 19, 20, 22]
[2024-06-01 14:25:53] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [4, 5, 11, 12, 13, 14, 19, 20]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 73 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 19/33 places, 16/16 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 18 transition count 7
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 10 transition count 7
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 10 transition count 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 8 transition count 5
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 7 transition count 4
Applied a total of 21 rules in 13 ms. Remains 7 /19 variables (removed 12) and now considering 4/16 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 4 rows 7 cols
[2024-06-01 14:25:53] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 14:25:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned [2, 4]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 30 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 5/33 places, 4/16 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 4 transition count 2
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 3 transition count 2
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 3 transition count 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 2 transition count 1
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 2 /5 variables (removed 3) and now considering 1/4 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 1 rows 2 cols
[2024-06-01 14:25:53] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 14:25:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 18 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 14:25:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:25:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 21 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 41 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 3 : 2/33 places, 1/16 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 170 ms. Remains : 2/33 places, 1/16 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 33 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-02
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4761 reset in 221 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4761 reset in 171 ms.
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 2 transition count 1
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X p0)), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 117 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 34 ms :[(NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 84 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (16 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X p0)), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 120 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 34 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 46 ms :[(NOT p0)]
[2024-06-01 14:25:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:25:54] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:25:54] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 3 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:25:54] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 0/0/0 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 1 ms.
[2024-06-01 14:25:54] [INFO ] Added : 0 causal constraints over 0 iterations in 4 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Support contains 1 out of 2 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 2/2 places, 1/1 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 2 /2 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1/1 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 14:25:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:25:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 20 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 14:25:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:25:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 21 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 43 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 14:25:54] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 0 sub problems to find dead transitions.
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 0ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 50 ms. Remains : 2/2 places, 1/1 transitions.
Computed a total of 2 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 2 transition count 1
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X p0)), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 162 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 34 ms :[(NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 84 steps (0 resets) in 5 ms. (14 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X p0)), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 127 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 39 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 38 ms :[(NOT p0)]
[2024-06-01 14:25:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:25:54] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 1 positive place invariants in 0 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:25:54] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:25:54] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 0/0/0 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 1 ms.
[2024-06-01 14:25:54] [INFO ] Added : 0 causal constraints over 0 iterations in 3 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 35 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4761 reset in 65 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 4761 reset in 147 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 2 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 2/2 places, 1/1 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 2 /2 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1/1 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 14:25:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:25:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 18 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 14:25:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:25:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 20 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 40 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 14:25:55] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 0 sub problems to find dead transitions.
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 0ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 47 ms. Remains : 2/2 places, 1/1 transitions.
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-02 finished in 1896 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 33 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 33/33 places, 16/16 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 70 edges and 33 vertex of which 18 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 15 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 15 places :
Also discarding 6 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 6 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Applied a total of 1 rules in 3 ms. Remains 16 /33 variables (removed 17) and now considering 10/16 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 10 rows 16 cols
[2024-06-01 14:25:55] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 14:25:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned [3, 8, 10, 11]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 44 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 12/33 places, 10/16 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 11 transition count 7
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 9 transition count 7
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 9 transition count 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 7 transition count 5
Applied a total of 8 rules in 4 ms. Remains 7 /12 variables (removed 5) and now considering 5/10 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 5 rows 7 cols
[2024-06-01 14:25:55] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-06-01 14:25:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 14:25:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:25:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 33 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 61 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 7/33 places, 5/16 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 112 ms. Remains : 7/33 places, 5/16 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 37 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-03
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 990 reset in 81 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 990 reset in 102 ms.
Computed a total of 7 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 7 transition count 5
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 90 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 33 ms :[(NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 168 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (33 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 115 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 34 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 33 ms :[(NOT p0)]
[2024-06-01 14:25:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:25:55] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 2 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:25:55] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 5 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:25:55] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-06-01 14:25:56] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 0 positive and 2 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:25:56] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 4 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:25:56] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 4/6/4 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 2 ms.
[2024-06-01 14:25:56] [INFO ] Added : 1 causal constraints over 1 iterations in 8 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Support contains 2 out of 7 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 7/7 places, 5/5 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 7 /7 variables (removed 0) and now considering 5/5 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 14:25:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:25:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 22 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 14:25:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:25:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 33 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 63 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 14:25:56] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 4 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 14:25:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/7 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 5/12 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/12 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 12/12 variables, and 9 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 70 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 7/7 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/7 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 5/12 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/12 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 12/12 variables, and 13 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 69 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 7/7 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 145ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 146ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 216 ms. Remains : 7/7 places, 5/5 transitions.
Computed a total of 7 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 7 transition count 5
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 87 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 40 ms :[(NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 168 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (33 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 117 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 34 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 34 ms :[(NOT p0)]
[2024-06-01 14:25:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:25:56] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 2 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:25:56] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 6 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:25:56] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-06-01 14:25:56] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 0 positive and 2 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:25:56] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 5 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:25:56] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 4/6/4 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 1 ms.
[2024-06-01 14:25:56] [INFO ] Added : 1 causal constraints over 1 iterations in 8 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 34 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 990 reset in 82 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 990 reset in 98 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 7 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 7/7 places, 5/5 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 7 /7 variables (removed 0) and now considering 5/5 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 14:25:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:25:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 14:25:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:25:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 32 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 64 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 14:25:56] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 4 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 14:25:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/7 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 5/12 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/12 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 12/12 variables, and 9 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 72 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 7/7 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/7 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 5/12 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/12 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 12/12 variables, and 13 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 72 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 7/7 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 149ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 149ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 219 ms. Remains : 7/7 places, 5/5 transitions.
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-03 finished in 1909 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(p0)||X(p1)))'
Support contains 3 out of 33 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 33/33 places, 16/16 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 27 transition count 16
Applied a total of 6 rules in 0 ms. Remains 27 /33 variables (removed 6) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 16 rows 27 cols
[2024-06-01 14:25:57] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 14:25:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned [4, 5, 6, 11, 12, 13, 14, 20, 22]
[2024-06-01 14:25:57] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [4, 5, 11, 12, 13, 14, 20, 22]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 63 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 19/33 places, 16/16 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 19 /19 variables (removed 0) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 63 ms. Remains : 19/33 places, 16/16 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 152 ms :[true, (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-04
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 72 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-04 finished in 230 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((p0||X(X(F((p1&&X(X(p2)))))))))'
Support contains 4 out of 33 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 33/33 places, 16/16 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 27 transition count 16
Applied a total of 6 rules in 1 ms. Remains 27 /33 variables (removed 6) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 16 rows 27 cols
[2024-06-01 14:25:57] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 14:25:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned [4, 5, 12, 13, 14, 19, 20, 22]
[2024-06-01 14:25:57] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [4, 5, 12, 13, 14, 19, 20]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 77 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 20/33 places, 16/16 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 20 /20 variables (removed 0) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 79 ms. Remains : 20/33 places, 16/16 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 258 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (NOT p2), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-05
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 320 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-05 finished in 354 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)&&F(G(p1)))))'
Support contains 3 out of 33 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 33/33 places, 16/16 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 70 edges and 33 vertex of which 25 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 8 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 8 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 2 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Applied a total of 1 rules in 3 ms. Remains 23 /33 variables (removed 10) and now considering 14/16 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 14 rows 23 cols
[2024-06-01 14:25:57] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 14:25:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned [4, 5, 6, 12, 13, 14, 19]
[2024-06-01 14:25:57] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [4, 5, 12, 13, 14, 19]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 58 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 17/33 places, 14/16 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 17 transition count 9
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 12 transition count 8
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 11 transition count 8
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 11 transition count 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 10 transition count 7
Applied a total of 14 rules in 2 ms. Remains 10 /17 variables (removed 7) and now considering 7/14 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 7 rows 10 cols
[2024-06-01 14:25:57] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 14:25:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 25 ms returned [2]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 26 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 9/33 places, 7/16 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 9 transition count 6
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 8 transition count 5
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 7 transition count 5
Applied a total of 4 rules in 1 ms. Remains 7 /9 variables (removed 2) and now considering 5/7 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 5 rows 7 cols
[2024-06-01 14:25:57] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-06-01 14:25:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 21 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 14:25:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:25:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 25 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 47 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 3 : 7/33 places, 5/16 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 138 ms. Remains : 7/33 places, 5/16 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 106 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-06
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 991 reset in 78 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 991 reset in 100 ms.
Computed a total of 7 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 7 transition count 5
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (G p0)), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 132 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 32 ms :[(NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 340 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (68 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (G p0)), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p1)]
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 168 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 33 ms :[(NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 53 ms :[(NOT p1)]
[2024-06-01 14:25:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:25:58] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:25:58] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 8 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:25:58] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-06-01 14:25:58] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:25:58] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 3 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:25:58] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 4/4/4 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 1 ms.
[2024-06-01 14:25:58] [INFO ] Added : 4 causal constraints over 1 iterations in 6 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p1)
Support contains 2 out of 7 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 7/7 places, 5/5 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 7 /7 variables (removed 0) and now considering 5/5 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 14:25:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:25:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 21 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 14:25:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:25:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 24 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 47 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 14:25:58] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 4 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 14:25:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/7 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/12 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/12 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 12/12 variables, and 9 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 56 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 7/7 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/7 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/12 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/12 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 12/12 variables, and 13 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 51 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 7/7 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 110ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 111ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 163 ms. Remains : 7/7 places, 5/5 transitions.
Computed a total of 7 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 7 transition count 5
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p1), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 86 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 47 ms :[(NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 340 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (68 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p1), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p1)]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 110 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 34 ms :[(NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 34 ms :[(NOT p1)]
[2024-06-01 14:25:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:25:59] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:25:59] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 5 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:25:59] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-06-01 14:25:59] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:25:59] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 4 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:25:59] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 4/4/4 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 1 ms.
[2024-06-01 14:25:59] [INFO ] Added : 4 causal constraints over 1 iterations in 7 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p1)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 34 ms :[(NOT p1)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 990 reset in 89 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 990 reset in 95 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 7 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 7/7 places, 5/5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 7 transition count 4
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 6 transition count 3
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 5 transition count 3
Applied a total of 4 rules in 1 ms. Remains 5 /7 variables (removed 2) and now considering 3/5 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 3 rows 5 cols
[2024-06-01 14:25:59] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 14:25:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 20 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 14:25:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:25:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 22 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 43 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 14:25:59] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 2 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 14:25:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/5 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/8 variables, 5/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/8 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 8/8 variables, and 7 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 41 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 5/5 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/5 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/8 variables, 5/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/8 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 8/8 variables, and 9 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 37 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 5/5 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 80ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 80ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 5/7 places, 3/5 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 131 ms. Remains : 5/7 places, 3/5 transitions.
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-06 finished in 1937 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G((p0||X(G((p1 U p2)))))))'
Support contains 4 out of 33 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 33/33 places, 16/16 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 27 transition count 16
Applied a total of 6 rules in 1 ms. Remains 27 /33 variables (removed 6) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 16 rows 27 cols
[2024-06-01 14:25:59] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-06-01 14:25:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned [4, 5, 6, 12, 13, 14, 19, 20, 22]
[2024-06-01 14:25:59] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [4, 5, 12, 13, 14, 19, 20]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 53 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 20/33 places, 16/16 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 20 /20 variables (removed 0) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 56 ms. Remains : 20/33 places, 16/16 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 160 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), true, (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-08
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 299 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-08 finished in 342 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(p0))'
Support contains 4 out of 33 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 33/33 places, 16/16 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 70 edges and 33 vertex of which 30 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 3 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 3 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Applied a total of 1 rules in 2 ms. Remains 28 /33 variables (removed 5) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 16 rows 28 cols
[2024-06-01 14:26:00] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-06-01 14:26:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned [4, 5, 11, 12, 13, 14, 19, 20, 22]
[2024-06-01 14:26:00] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [4, 5, 11, 12, 13, 14, 19, 20]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 64 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 20/33 places, 16/16 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 19 transition count 12
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 16 transition count 11
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 15 transition count 11
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 15 transition count 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 12 transition count 8
Applied a total of 14 rules in 3 ms. Remains 12 /20 variables (removed 8) and now considering 8/16 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 8 rows 12 cols
[2024-06-01 14:26:00] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-06-01 14:26:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 25 ms returned [7]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 26 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 11/33 places, 8/16 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 12 edges and 11 vertex of which 10 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 1 ms. Remains 10 /11 variables (removed 1) and now considering 7/8 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 7 rows 10 cols
[2024-06-01 14:26:00] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-06-01 14:26:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 21 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 14:26:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:26:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 25 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 47 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 3 : 10/33 places, 7/16 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 143 ms. Remains : 10/33 places, 7/16 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 32 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-11
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1898 reset in 171 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1917 reset in 212 ms.
Computed a total of 10 stabilizing places and 7 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 10 transition count 7
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 91 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 35 ms :[(NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 588 steps (0 resets) in 5 ms. (98 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (OR (G p0) (G (NOT p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 129 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 34 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 36 ms :[(NOT p0)]
[2024-06-01 14:26:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:26:01] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:26:01] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:26:01] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 5 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:26:01] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 6/8/6 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 1 ms.
[2024-06-01 14:26:01] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-06-01 14:26:01] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:26:01] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:26:01] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 5 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:26:01] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 6/8/6 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 0 ms.
[2024-06-01 14:26:01] [INFO ] Added : 6 causal constraints over 2 iterations in 7 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Support contains 4 out of 10 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 10/10 places, 7/7 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 11 edges and 10 vertex of which 9 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 9 transition count 6
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 8 transition count 6
Applied a total of 3 rules in 2 ms. Remains 8 /10 variables (removed 2) and now considering 6/7 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 6 rows 8 cols
[2024-06-01 14:26:01] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-06-01 14:26:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 22 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 14:26:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:26:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 24 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 47 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 14:26:01] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 5 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 14:26:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/8 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 6/14 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/14 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 14/14 variables, and 10 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 75 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/8 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 6/14 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 5/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/14 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 14/14 variables, and 15 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 66 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 144ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 144ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 8/10 places, 6/7 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 198 ms. Remains : 8/10 places, 6/7 transitions.
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-11 finished in 1259 ms.
Application raised an uncaught exception Index 8 out of bounds for length 8
java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 8 out of bounds for length 8
at java.base/jdk.internal.util.Preconditions.outOfBounds(Preconditions.java:64)
at java.base/jdk.internal.util.Preconditions.outOfBoundsCheckIndex(Preconditions.java:70)
at java.base/jdk.internal.util.Preconditions.checkIndex(Preconditions.java:266)
at java.base/java.util.Objects.checkIndex(Objects.java:361)
at java.base/java.util.ArrayList.get(ArrayList.java:427)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.SparsePetriNet.simplifyConstants(SparsePetriNet.java:181)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.SparsePetriNet.simplifyConstants(SparsePetriNet.java:155)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.SparsePetriNet.simplifyConstants(SparsePetriNet.java:166)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.SparsePetriNet.simplifyConstants(SparsePetriNet.java:154)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.SparsePetriNet.simplifyConstants(SparsePetriNet.java:166)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.SparsePetriNet.simplifyConstants(SparsePetriNet.java:154)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.SparsePetriNet.simplifyConstants(SparsePetriNet.java:166)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.SparsePetriNet.readFrom(SparsePetriNet.java:434)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.solver.ltl.LTLPropertySolver.reduceForProperty(LTLPropertySolver.java:496)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.solver.ltl.LTLPropertySolver.checkLTLProperty(LTLPropertySolver.java:258)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.solver.ltl.LTLPropertySolver.runStutteringLTLTest(LTLPropertySolver.java:225)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.solver.ltl.LTLPropertySolver.runStructuralLTLCheck(LTLPropertySolver.java:76)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.Application.startNoEx(Application.java:958)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.Application.start(Application.java:189)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.itscl.application.Application.start(Application.java:45)
at org.eclipse.equinox.internal.app.EclipseAppHandle.run(EclipseAppHandle.java:208)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.runApplication(EclipseAppLauncher.java:136)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.start(EclipseAppLauncher.java:104)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:402)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:255)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:77)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:568)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.invokeFramework(Main.java:651)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.basicRun(Main.java:588)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.run(Main.java:1459)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.main(Main.java:1432)
Total runtime 12341 ms.
Could not compute solution for formula : PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-00
Could not compute solution for formula : PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-01
Could not compute solution for formula : PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-02
Could not compute solution for formula : PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-03
Could not compute solution for formula : PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-04
Could not compute solution for formula : PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-05
Could not compute solution for formula : PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-06
Could not compute solution for formula : PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-07
Could not compute solution for formula : PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-08
Could not compute solution for formula : PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-09
Could not compute solution for formula : PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-10
Could not compute solution for formula : PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-11
Could not compute solution for formula : PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-12
Could not compute solution for formula : PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-13
Could not compute solution for formula : PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-14
Could not compute solution for formula : PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-15
BK_STOP 1717251962178
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLCardinality -timeout 360 -rebuildPNML
mcc2024
ltl formula name PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-00
ltl formula formula --ltl=/tmp/1154/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading model from model.pnml
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Edge label is id
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 3/ 4), ** error **: pnml type "http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet" is not supported
pnml2lts-mc( 2/ 4), ** error **: pnml type "http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet" is not supported
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4), ** error **: pnml type "http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet" is not supported
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4), ** error **: pnml type "http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet" is not supported
ltl formula name PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-01
ltl formula formula --ltl=/tmp/1154/ltl_1_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading model from model.pnml
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Edge label is id
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4), ** error **: pnml type "http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet" is not supported
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4), ** error **: pnml type "http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet" is not supported
ltl formula name PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-02
ltl formula formula --ltl=/tmp/1154/ltl_2_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading model from model.pnml
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Edge label is id
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4), ** error **: pnml type "http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet" is not supported
ltl formula name PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-03
ltl formula formula --ltl=/tmp/1154/ltl_3_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading model from model.pnml
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Edge label is id
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4), ** error **: pnml type "http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet" is not supported
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4), ** error **: pnml type "http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet" is not supported
ltl formula name PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-04
ltl formula formula --ltl=/tmp/1154/ltl_4_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading model from model.pnml
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Edge label is id
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4), ** error **: pnml type "http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet" is not supported
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4), ** error **: pnml type "http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet" is not supported
pnml2lts-mc( 2/ 4), ** error **: pnml type "http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet" is not supported
pnml2lts-mc( 3/ 4), ** error **: pnml type "http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet" is not supported
ltl formula name PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-05
ltl formula formula --ltl=/tmp/1154/ltl_5_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading model from model.pnml
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Edge label is id
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4), ** error **: pnml type "http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet" is not supported
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4), ** error **: pnml type "http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet" is not supported
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 2/ 4), ** error **: pnml type "http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet" is not supported
pnml2lts-mc( 3/ 4), ** error **: pnml type "http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet" is not supported
ltl formula name PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-06
ltl formula formula --ltl=/tmp/1154/ltl_6_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading model from model.pnml
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Edge label is id
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4), ** error **: pnml type "http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet" is not supported
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4), ** error **: pnml type "http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet" is not supported
ltl formula name PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-07
ltl formula formula --ltl=/tmp/1154/ltl_7_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading model from model.pnml
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Edge label is id
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4), ** error **: pnml type "http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet" is not supported
ltl formula name PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-08
ltl formula formula --ltl=/tmp/1154/ltl_8_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading model from model.pnml
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Edge label is id
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4), ** error **: pnml type "http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet" is not supported
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4), ** error **: pnml type "http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet" is not supported
ltl formula name PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-09
ltl formula formula --ltl=/tmp/1154/ltl_9_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading model from model.pnml
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Edge label is id
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4), ** error **: pnml type "http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet" is not supported
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4), ** error **: pnml type "http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet" is not supported
ltl formula name PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-10
ltl formula formula --ltl=/tmp/1154/ltl_10_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading model from model.pnml
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Edge label is id
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4), ** error **: pnml type "http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet" is not supported
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4), ** error **: pnml type "http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet" is not supported
ltl formula name PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-11
ltl formula formula --ltl=/tmp/1154/ltl_11_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading model from model.pnml
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Edge label is id
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4), ** error **: pnml type "http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet" is not supported
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4), ** error **: pnml type "http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet" is not supported
pnml2lts-mc( 2/ 4), ** error **: pnml type "http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet" is not supported
ltl formula name PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-12
ltl formula formula --ltl=/tmp/1154/ltl_12_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading model from model.pnml
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Edge label is id
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4), ** error **: pnml type "http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet" is not supported
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4), ** error **: pnml type "http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet" is not supported
ltl formula name PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-13
ltl formula formula --ltl=/tmp/1154/ltl_13_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading model from model.pnml
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Edge label is id
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4), ** error **: pnml type "http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet" is not supported
ltl formula name PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-14
ltl formula formula --ltl=/tmp/1154/ltl_14_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading model from model.pnml
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Edge label is id
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4), ** error **: pnml type "http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet" is not supported
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4), ** error **: pnml type "http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet" is not supported
pnml2lts-mc( 2/ 4), ** error **: pnml type "http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet" is not supported
ltl formula name PermAdmissibility-COL-20-LTLCardinality-15
ltl formula formula --ltl=/tmp/1154/ltl_15_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading model from model.pnml
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Edge label is id
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4), ** error **: pnml type "http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet" is not supported
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="PermAdmissibility-COL-20"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="ltsminxred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool ltsminxred"
echo " Input is PermAdmissibility-COL-20, examination is LTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r512-smll-171654407000139"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/PermAdmissibility-COL-20.tgz
mv PermAdmissibility-COL-20 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;