About the Execution of LTSMin+red for PermAdmissibility-COL-05
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
755.304 | 30042.00 | 46804.00 | 392.80 | TFFFFTFTTFFTFTTT | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r512-smll-171654407000124.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool ltsminxred
Input is PermAdmissibility-COL-05, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r512-smll-171654407000124
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 516K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.5K Apr 12 09:12 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 82K Apr 12 09:12 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K Apr 12 09:09 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 56K Apr 12 09:09 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 23 07:42 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K Apr 23 07:42 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K Apr 23 07:42 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Apr 23 07:42 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Apr 12 09:24 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 107K Apr 12 09:24 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 10K Apr 12 09:22 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 81K Apr 12 09:22 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Apr 23 07:42 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 23 07:42 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 54K May 18 16:43 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1717251586381
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=ltsminxred
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=PermAdmissibility-COL-05
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Applying reductions before tool ltsmin
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-06-01 14:19:48] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -timeout, 360, -rebuildPNML]
[2024-06-01 14:19:48] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-06-01 14:19:48] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2024-06-01 14:19:48] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2024-06-01 14:19:49] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 1032 ms
[2024-06-01 14:19:49] [INFO ] Imported 40 HL places and 16 HL transitions for a total of 208 PT places and 1024.0 transition bindings in 30 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 16 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
[2024-06-01 14:19:49] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 40 places and 16 transitions 83 arcs in 15 ms.
[2024-06-01 14:19:49] [INFO ] Skeletonized 16 HLPN properties in 3 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 5 formulas.
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Computed a total of 40 stabilizing places and 16 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 40 transition count 16
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Remains 11 properties that can be checked using skeleton over-approximation.
Computed a total of 40 stabilizing places and 16 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 40 transition count 16
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 15 to 13
RANDOM walk for 292 steps (0 resets) in 26 ms. (10 steps per ms) remains 0/13 properties
[2024-06-01 14:19:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2024-06-01 14:19:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial and guards and successors and join/free detected :input
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial detected :input
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial and guards detected :input
Applying symmetric unfolding of full symmetric sort :input domain size was 8
[2024-06-01 14:19:49] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 40 places and 16 transitions 83 arcs in 19 ms.
[2024-06-01 14:19:49] [INFO ] Unfolded 11 HLPN properties in 1 ms.
Support contains 27 out of 40 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 40/40 places, 16/16 transitions.
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 32 transition count 16
Applied a total of 8 rules in 22 ms. Remains 32 /40 variables (removed 8) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 16 rows 32 cols
[2024-06-01 14:19:49] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 11 ms
[2024-06-01 14:19:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 239 ms returned [24, 28]
[2024-06-01 14:19:50] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [24]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 289 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 31/40 places, 16/16 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 31 /31 variables (removed 0) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 350 ms. Remains : 31/40 places, 16/16 transitions.
Support contains 27 out of 31 places after structural reductions.
[2024-06-01 14:19:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-01 14:19:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-01 14:19:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 16 transitions.
Support contains 26 out of 31 places (down from 27) after GAL structural reductions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 14 to 12
RANDOM walk for 292 steps (0 resets) in 16 ms. (17 steps per ms) remains 0/12 properties
Computed a total of 31 stabilizing places and 16 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 31 transition count 16
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F((G(F(p1))||p0))))'
Support contains 9 out of 31 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 30 transition count 16
Applied a total of 1 rules in 5 ms. Remains 30 /31 variables (removed 1) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 16 rows 30 cols
[2024-06-01 14:19:50] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 14:19:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 95 ms returned [4, 6, 12, 15, 16, 17, 19, 26]
[2024-06-01 14:19:50] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [4, 12, 15, 17, 26]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 98 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 25/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 25 /25 variables (removed 0) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 105 ms. Remains : 25/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 279 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-00
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 13391 reset in 391 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 13440 reset in 265 ms.
Computed a total of 25 stabilizing places and 16 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 25 transition count 16
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 178 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 11 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 184 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), false, false]
RANDOM walk for 40009 steps (411 resets) in 321 ms. (124 steps per ms) remains 1/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 441 steps (0 resets) in 10 ms. (40 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p1), (F p0), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (F (NOT (OR p1 (NOT p0)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 415 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 11 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 5 states, 11 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 184 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 188 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), false, false]
// Phase 1: matrix 16 rows 25 cols
[2024-06-01 14:19:53] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-01 14:19:53] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:19:53] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 24 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:19:53] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 15/29/15 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 5 ms.
[2024-06-01 14:19:53] [INFO ] Added : 9 causal constraints over 2 iterations in 34 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))
Support contains 9 out of 25 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 25/25 places, 16/16 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 46 edges and 25 vertex of which 23 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 21 transition count 12
Applied a total of 2 rules in 12 ms. Remains 21 /25 variables (removed 4) and now considering 12/16 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 12 rows 21 cols
[2024-06-01 14:19:53] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 14:19:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned [5, 11, 13]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 46 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 18/25 places, 12/16 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 18 transition count 11
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 17 transition count 11
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 17 transition count 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 15 transition count 9
Applied a total of 6 rules in 6 ms. Remains 15 /18 variables (removed 3) and now considering 9/12 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 9 rows 15 cols
[2024-06-01 14:19:53] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 14:19:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 14:19:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:19:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 44 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 76 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 15/25 places, 9/16 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 140 ms. Remains : 15/25 places, 9/16 transitions.
Computed a total of 15 stabilizing places and 9 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 15 transition count 9
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT (AND p1 p0))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (F (G (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 11 factoid took 434 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 11 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 5 states, 11 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 181 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), false, false]
RANDOM walk for 32140 steps (583 resets) in 90 ms. (353 steps per ms) remains 0/5 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT (AND p1 p0))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (F (G (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F p1), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 11 factoid took 596 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 11 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 5 states, 11 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 186 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 194 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), false, false]
[2024-06-01 14:19:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:19:55] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:19:55] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 9 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:19:55] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 8/16/8 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 1 ms.
[2024-06-01 14:19:55] [INFO ] Added : 8 causal constraints over 2 iterations in 30 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 180 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), false, false]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 15747 reset in 127 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 15624 reset in 300 ms.
Support contains 9 out of 15 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 15/15 places, 9/9 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 15 /15 variables (removed 0) and now considering 9/9 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 14:19:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:19:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 14:19:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:19:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 40 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 80 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 14:19:55] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 8 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 14:19:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/15 variables, 2/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 9/24 variables, 15/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/24 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 24/24 variables, and 21 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved in 153 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 15/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/15 variables, 2/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 9/24 variables, 15/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 8/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/24 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 24/24 variables, and 29 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved in 144 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 15/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 325ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 332ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 421 ms. Remains : 15/15 places, 9/9 transitions.
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-00 finished in 5615 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(p0)||(F(G(p1))&&(p2 U p3))))'
Support contains 12 out of 31 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 77 edges and 31 vertex of which 28 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 3 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 3 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 2 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Applied a total of 1 rules in 2 ms. Remains 27 /31 variables (removed 4) and now considering 14/16 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 14 rows 27 cols
[2024-06-01 14:19:56] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 14:19:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned [4, 6, 12, 15, 16]
[2024-06-01 14:19:56] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [4, 12, 15]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 50 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 24/31 places, 14/16 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 23 transition count 13
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 23 /24 variables (removed 1) and now considering 13/14 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 13 rows 23 cols
[2024-06-01 14:19:56] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 14:19:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned [5, 12]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 41 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 21/31 places, 13/16 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 21 transition count 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 20 transition count 12
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 20 /21 variables (removed 1) and now considering 12/13 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 12 rows 20 cols
[2024-06-01 14:19:56] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 14:19:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 14:19:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:19:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 44 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 72 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 3 : 20/31 places, 12/16 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 170 ms. Remains : 20/31 places, 12/16 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 270 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), true, (NOT p0), (NOT p1), (NOT p3), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-02
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 22 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-02 finished in 462 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 3 out of 31 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 77 edges and 31 vertex of which 4 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 27 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 27 places :
Also discarding 14 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 14 transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 2 ms. Remains 4 /31 variables (removed 27) and now considering 2/16 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 2 rows 4 cols
[2024-06-01 14:19:56] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-06-01 14:19:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 20 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 14:19:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:19:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 24 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 46 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 14:19:56] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 1 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 14:19:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/4 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/6 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/6 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 6/6 variables, and 6 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 33 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/4 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/6 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/6 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 6/6 variables, and 7 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 29 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 67ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 68ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 4/31 places, 2/16 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 128 ms. Remains : 4/31 places, 2/16 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 71 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-04
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 42 steps with 11 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-04 finished in 211 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((!p0&&F((G(F(p1))||(F(p1)&&p2))))))'
Support contains 6 out of 31 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 77 edges and 31 vertex of which 12 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 19 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 19 places :
Also discarding 10 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 10 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Applied a total of 1 rules in 2 ms. Remains 11 /31 variables (removed 20) and now considering 6/16 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 6 rows 11 cols
[2024-06-01 14:19:56] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-01 14:19:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned [6]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 31 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 10/31 places, 6/16 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 10 transition count 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 9 transition count 5
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 9 /10 variables (removed 1) and now considering 5/6 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 5 rows 9 cols
[2024-06-01 14:19:56] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 14:19:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 25 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 14:19:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:19:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 29 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 56 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 9/31 places, 5/16 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 91 ms. Remains : 9/31 places, 5/16 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 119 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) p0), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-07
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 7588 reset in 170 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 7604 reset in 208 ms.
Computed a total of 9 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 9 transition count 5
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G p1)), (F (G (NOT p2)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))))]
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 12 factoid took 18 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-07 finished in 674 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G((X(F(p1))||p0))))'
Support contains 6 out of 31 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 77 edges and 31 vertex of which 20 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 11 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 11 places :
Also discarding 6 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 6 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Applied a total of 1 rules in 2 ms. Remains 18 /31 variables (removed 13) and now considering 10/16 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 10 rows 18 cols
[2024-06-01 14:19:57] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 14:19:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned [8, 9, 12, 14]
[2024-06-01 14:19:57] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [8, 9, 12]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 49 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 15/31 places, 10/16 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 14 transition count 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 13 transition count 8
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 13 /15 variables (removed 2) and now considering 8/10 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 8 rows 13 cols
[2024-06-01 14:19:57] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-06-01 14:19:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned [9]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 32 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 12/31 places, 8/16 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 12 /12 variables (removed 0) and now considering 8/8 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 87 ms. Remains : 12/31 places, 8/16 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 70 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-08
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3104 reset in 284 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3095 reset in 205 ms.
Computed a total of 12 stabilizing places and 8 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 12 transition count 8
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1)), (F (G p0)), (F (G p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 11 factoid took 16 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-08 finished in 714 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(!p0)&&F(p1)&&F(G(p2)))))'
Support contains 9 out of 31 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 77 edges and 31 vertex of which 28 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 3 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 3 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 2 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Applied a total of 1 rules in 2 ms. Remains 26 /31 variables (removed 5) and now considering 14/16 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 14 rows 26 cols
[2024-06-01 14:19:58] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 14:19:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned [4, 6, 12, 13, 16, 18]
[2024-06-01 14:19:58] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [4, 12, 13, 16]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 61 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 22/31 places, 14/16 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 21 transition count 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 20 transition count 12
Applied a total of 2 rules in 3 ms. Remains 20 /22 variables (removed 2) and now considering 12/14 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 12 rows 20 cols
[2024-06-01 14:19:58] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-06-01 14:19:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned [5, 12]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 39 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 18/31 places, 12/16 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 18 transition count 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 17 transition count 11
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 17 /18 variables (removed 1) and now considering 11/12 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 11 rows 17 cols
[2024-06-01 14:19:58] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 14:19:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 14:19:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:19:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 36 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 69 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 3 : 17/31 places, 11/16 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 176 ms. Remains : 17/31 places, 11/16 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 185 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p0), p0, (NOT p1), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-09
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 81 steps with 1 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-09 finished in 380 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F((G(p1)&&p0))))'
Support contains 6 out of 31 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 29 transition count 16
Applied a total of 2 rules in 1 ms. Remains 29 /31 variables (removed 2) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 16 rows 29 cols
[2024-06-01 14:19:58] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 14:19:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned [4, 5, 6, 7, 12, 13, 16, 18, 25]
[2024-06-01 14:19:58] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [4, 5, 12, 13, 16, 25]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 64 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 23/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 23 /23 variables (removed 0) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 67 ms. Remains : 23/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 116 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-10
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 80 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-10 finished in 198 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((X(p0)&&F((p0&&X(p0))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 31 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 29 transition count 16
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 29 /31 variables (removed 2) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 14:19:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:19:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned [4, 5, 6, 7, 12, 13, 14, 15, 22, 24, 25]
[2024-06-01 14:19:58] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [4, 5, 12, 13, 14, 22, 25]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 72 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 22/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 22 /22 variables (removed 0) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 75 ms. Remains : 22/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 182 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), true, (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-11
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 206 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 294 ms.
Computed a total of 22 stabilizing places and 16 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 22 transition count 16
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0)), (F (G p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 14 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 8 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-11 finished in 819 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F((X(F(p1))&&p0))))'
Support contains 6 out of 31 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 30 transition count 16
Applied a total of 1 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /31 variables (removed 1) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 16 rows 30 cols
[2024-06-01 14:19:59] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 14:19:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned [4, 6, 12, 15, 16, 17, 19, 23, 25, 26]
[2024-06-01 14:19:59] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [4, 12, 15, 17, 23, 26]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 76 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 24/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 24 /24 variables (removed 0) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 78 ms. Remains : 24/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 109 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-13
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25452 reset in 62 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25400 reset in 82 ms.
Computed a total of 24 stabilizing places and 16 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 24 transition count 16
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) p0), (X p0), (F (G (NOT p1))), (F (G p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X p1)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 204 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 103 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 28 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (5 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) p0), (X p0), (F (G (NOT p1))), (F (G p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X p1)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F p1)]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 230 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 107 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 104 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
// Phase 1: matrix 16 rows 24 cols
[2024-06-01 14:20:00] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 14:20:00] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 8 generalized place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:20:00] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 13 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:20:00] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-06-01 14:20:00] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 0 positive and 8 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:20:00] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 13 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:20:00] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 15/27/15 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 2 ms.
[2024-06-01 14:20:00] [INFO ] Added : 15 causal constraints over 3 iterations in 21 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p1)
Support contains 3 out of 24 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 24/24 places, 16/16 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 24 /24 variables (removed 0) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 14:20:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:20:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned [5, 13, 15, 20]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 52 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 20/24 places, 16/16 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 20 /20 variables (removed 0) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 54 ms. Remains : 20/24 places, 16/16 transitions.
Computed a total of 20 stabilizing places and 16 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 20 transition count 16
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p1), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X p1))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 123 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 102 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 28 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (5 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p1), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X p1)), (F p1)]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 141 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 100 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 101 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
// Phase 1: matrix 16 rows 20 cols
[2024-06-01 14:20:01] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-01 14:20:01] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:20:01] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 14 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:20:01] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-06-01 14:20:01] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:20:01] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 9 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:20:01] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 15/19/15 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 2 ms.
[2024-06-01 14:20:01] [INFO ] Added : 0 causal constraints over 0 iterations in 6 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p1)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 101 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25420 reset in 49 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25373 reset in 56 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 109 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Support contains 3 out of 20 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 20/20 places, 16/16 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 25 edges and 20 vertex of which 6 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 14 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 14 places :
Also discarding 12 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 12 transitions
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 6 transition count 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 6 transition count 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 2 rules in 5 ms. Remains 6 /20 variables (removed 14) and now considering 4/16 (removed 12) transitions.
[2024-06-01 14:20:02] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 3 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 4 rows 6 cols
[2024-06-01 14:20:02] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/6 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/10 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/10 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 10/10 variables, and 8 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved in 50 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 6/6 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/6 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/10 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 2/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/10 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 10/10 variables, and 10 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved in 38 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 6/6 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 93ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 1 dead transitions in 93ms
Found 1 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 1 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 6/20 places, 3/16 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 4 edges and 6 vertex of which 5 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 1 ms. Remains 5 /6 variables (removed 1) and now considering 3/3 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 5/20 places, 3/16 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 107 ms. Remains : 5/20 places, 3/16 transitions.
Support contains 3 out of 20 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 20/20 places, 16/16 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 20 /20 variables (removed 0) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 16 rows 20 cols
[2024-06-01 14:20:02] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 14:20:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned [4, 5]
[2024-06-01 14:20:02] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [4]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 30 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 19/20 places, 16/16 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 19 /19 variables (removed 0) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 32 ms. Remains : 19/20 places, 16/16 transitions.
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-13 finished in 2816 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(!p0))'
Support contains 3 out of 31 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 77 edges and 31 vertex of which 12 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 19 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 19 places :
Also discarding 10 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 10 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Applied a total of 1 rules in 1 ms. Remains 10 /31 variables (removed 21) and now considering 6/16 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 6 rows 10 cols
[2024-06-01 14:20:02] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-06-01 14:20:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned [4, 5]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 38 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 8/31 places, 6/16 transitions.
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 8 transition count 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 6 transition count 4
Applied a total of 4 rules in 1 ms. Remains 6 /8 variables (removed 2) and now considering 4/6 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 4 rows 6 cols
[2024-06-01 14:20:02] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-06-01 14:20:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 21 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 14:20:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:20:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 21 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 44 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 6/31 places, 4/16 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 84 ms. Remains : 6/31 places, 4/16 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 34 ms :[p0]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-14
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 15786 reset in 57 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 15737 reset in 69 ms.
Computed a total of 6 stabilizing places and 4 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 6 transition count 4
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0)), (F (G p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 81 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 34 ms :[p0]
RANDOM walk for 52 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (10 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0)), (F (G p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 120 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 33 ms :[p0]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 34 ms :[p0]
[2024-06-01 14:20:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:20:03] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 2 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:20:03] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 4 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:20:03] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 3/7/3 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 0 ms.
[2024-06-01 14:20:03] [INFO ] Added : 3 causal constraints over 1 iterations in 5 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG p0
Support contains 3 out of 6 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 6/6 places, 4/4 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 6 /6 variables (removed 0) and now considering 4/4 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 14:20:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:20:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 19 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 14:20:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:20:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 22 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 43 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 14:20:03] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 3 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 14:20:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/9 variables, 5/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/10 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/10 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 10/10 variables, and 8 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 65 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 6/6 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/9 variables, 5/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/10 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/10 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 10/10 variables, and 11 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 59 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 6/6 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 127ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 128ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 177 ms. Remains : 6/6 places, 4/4 transitions.
Computed a total of 6 stabilizing places and 4 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 6 transition count 4
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0)), (F (G p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 153 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 31 ms :[p0]
RANDOM walk for 52 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (10 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0)), (F (G p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 110 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 33 ms :[p0]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 33 ms :[p0]
[2024-06-01 14:20:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:20:03] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 2 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:20:03] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 3 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:20:03] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 3/7/3 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 0 ms.
[2024-06-01 14:20:03] [INFO ] Added : 3 causal constraints over 1 iterations in 4 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG p0
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 34 ms :[p0]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 15699 reset in 59 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 15775 reset in 72 ms.
Support contains 3 out of 6 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 6/6 places, 4/4 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 6 /6 variables (removed 0) and now considering 4/4 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 14:20:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:20:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 21 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 14:20:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:20:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 24 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 47 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 14:20:03] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 3 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 14:20:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/9 variables, 5/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/10 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/10 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 10/10 variables, and 8 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 47 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 6/6 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/9 variables, 5/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/10 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/10 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 10/10 variables, and 11 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 75 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 6/6 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 128ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 128ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 180 ms. Remains : 6/6 places, 4/4 transitions.
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-14 finished in 1631 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((X(F(p1))&&p0)))'
Support contains 6 out of 31 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 29 transition count 16
Applied a total of 2 rules in 1 ms. Remains 29 /31 variables (removed 2) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 16 rows 29 cols
[2024-06-01 14:20:04] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 14:20:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned [5, 7, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 25]
[2024-06-01 14:20:04] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [5, 12, 13, 14, 16, 25]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 60 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 23/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 23 /23 variables (removed 0) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 61 ms. Remains : 23/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 69 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-15
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2487 reset in 103 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2469 reset in 116 ms.
Computed a total of 23 stabilizing places and 16 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 23 transition count 16
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 110 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 71 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 292 steps (0 resets) in 7 ms. (36 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0), (F p1)]
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 170 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 70 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 70 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
// Phase 1: matrix 16 rows 23 cols
[2024-06-01 14:20:05] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-06-01 14:20:05] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 7 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:20:05] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 17 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:20:05] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 15/29/15 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 2 ms.
[2024-06-01 14:20:05] [INFO ] Added : 7 causal constraints over 2 iterations in 13 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
[2024-06-01 14:20:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:20:05] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 7 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:20:05] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 12 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:20:05] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 15/29/15 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 3 ms.
[2024-06-01 14:20:05] [INFO ] Added : 15 causal constraints over 3 iterations in 22 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p1)
Support contains 6 out of 23 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 23/23 places, 16/16 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 23 /23 variables (removed 0) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 14:20:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:20:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned [6, 11, 13]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 37 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 20/23 places, 16/16 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 20 /20 variables (removed 0) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 39 ms. Remains : 20/23 places, 16/16 transitions.
Computed a total of 20 stabilizing places and 16 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 20 transition count 16
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 113 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 71 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 272 steps (0 resets) in 7 ms. (34 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0), (F p1)]
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 185 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 77 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 74 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
// Phase 1: matrix 16 rows 20 cols
[2024-06-01 14:20:05] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-06-01 14:20:05] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:20:05] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 9 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:20:05] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 15/23/15 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 2 ms.
[2024-06-01 14:20:05] [INFO ] Added : 7 causal constraints over 2 iterations in 17 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
[2024-06-01 14:20:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:20:05] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:20:05] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 9 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:20:05] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 15/23/15 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 2 ms.
[2024-06-01 14:20:05] [INFO ] Added : 15 causal constraints over 3 iterations in 16 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p1)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 70 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2503 reset in 87 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2475 reset in 103 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [false, true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 73 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Support contains 6 out of 20 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 20/20 places, 16/16 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 29 edges and 20 vertex of which 18 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 2 transitions
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 18 transition count 14
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 1 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 18 transition count 14
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 18 transition count 14
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 15 transition count 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 15 transition count 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 14 rules in 7 ms. Remains 15 /20 variables (removed 5) and now considering 11/16 (removed 5) transitions.
[2024-06-01 14:20:06] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 10 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 11 rows 15 cols
[2024-06-01 14:20:06] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
Problem TDEAD2 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 11/25 variables, 14/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/26 variables, 1/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/26 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 26/26 variables, and 19 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved in 113 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 15/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 3/13 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 11/24 variables, 13/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 6/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 2/26 variables, 2/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/26 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 26/26 variables, and 25 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved in 138 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 15/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 6/10 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 260ms problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 6 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 4 dead transitions in 260ms
Found 4 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 4 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 4 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 15/20 places, 7/16 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 18 edges and 15 vertex of which 11 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 4 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 4 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 1 ms. Remains 11 /15 variables (removed 4) and now considering 7/7 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 11/20 places, 7/16 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 276 ms. Remains : 11/20 places, 7/16 transitions.
Support contains 6 out of 20 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 20/20 places, 16/16 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 20 /20 variables (removed 0) and now considering 16/16 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 16 rows 20 cols
[2024-06-01 14:20:06] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 14:20:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 14:20:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:20:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 33 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 60 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 15 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 14:20:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 16/35 variables, 19/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/36 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/36 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 36/36 variables, and 24 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved in 227 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 16/35 variables, 19/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 15/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/36 variables, 1/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/36 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 36/36 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved in 235 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 475ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 476ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 541 ms. Remains : 20/20 places, 16/16 transitions.
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-15 finished in 3086 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F((G(F(p1))||p0))))'
Found a Shortening insensitive property : PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-00
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 112 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Support contains 9 out of 31 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 77 edges and 31 vertex of which 28 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 3 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 3 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 2 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Applied a total of 1 rules in 3 ms. Remains 27 /31 variables (removed 4) and now considering 14/16 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 14 rows 27 cols
[2024-06-01 14:20:07] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 14:20:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned [4, 6, 12, 15, 16, 17, 19]
[2024-06-01 14:20:07] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [4, 12, 15, 17]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 53 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 23/31 places, 14/16 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 21 transition count 12
Applied a total of 1 rules in 4 ms. Remains 21 /23 variables (removed 2) and now considering 12/14 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 12 rows 21 cols
[2024-06-01 14:20:07] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-06-01 14:20:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned [5, 11, 13]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 35 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 18/31 places, 12/16 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 18 transition count 11
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 17 transition count 11
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 17 transition count 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 15 transition count 9
Applied a total of 6 rules in 5 ms. Remains 15 /18 variables (removed 3) and now considering 9/12 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 9 rows 15 cols
[2024-06-01 14:20:07] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-06-01 14:20:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 14:20:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:20:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 30 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 58 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 3 : 15/31 places, 9/16 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LI_LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 159 ms. Remains : 15/31 places, 9/16 transitions.
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-00
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 9238 reset in 113 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 9271 reset in 122 ms.
Computed a total of 15 stabilizing places and 9 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 15 transition count 9
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 256 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 11 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 175 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), false, false]
RANDOM walk for 26469 steps (479 resets) in 25 ms. (1018 steps per ms) remains 0/5 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F p1), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 417 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 11 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 5 states, 11 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 178 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 178 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), false, false]
[2024-06-01 14:20:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:20:09] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:20:09] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 9 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:20:09] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 8/16/8 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 1 ms.
[2024-06-01 14:20:09] [INFO ] Added : 8 causal constraints over 2 iterations in 11 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))
Support contains 9 out of 15 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 15/15 places, 9/9 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 15 /15 variables (removed 0) and now considering 9/9 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 14:20:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:20:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 24 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 14:20:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:20:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 27 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 54 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 14:20:09] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 8 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 14:20:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/15 variables, 2/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 9/24 variables, 15/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/24 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 24/24 variables, and 21 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved in 100 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 15/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/15 variables, 2/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 9/24 variables, 15/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 8/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/24 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 24/24 variables, and 29 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved in 98 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 15/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 203ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 203ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 263 ms. Remains : 15/15 places, 9/9 transitions.
Computed a total of 15 stabilizing places and 9 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 15 transition count 9
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 11 factoid took 344 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 11 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 5 states, 11 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 186 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), false, false]
RANDOM walk for 34111 steps (618 resets) in 31 ms. (1065 steps per ms) remains 0/5 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F p1), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 11 factoid took 589 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 11 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 5 states, 11 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 174 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 186 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), false, false]
[2024-06-01 14:20:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:20:11] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:20:11] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 7 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:20:11] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 8/16/8 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 1 ms.
[2024-06-01 14:20:11] [INFO ] Added : 8 causal constraints over 2 iterations in 12 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 176 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), false, false]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 15508 reset in 112 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 15753 reset in 124 ms.
Support contains 9 out of 15 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 15/15 places, 9/9 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 15 /15 variables (removed 0) and now considering 9/9 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 14:20:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:20:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 14:20:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:20:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 33 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 61 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-06-01 14:20:11] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 8 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 14:20:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/15 variables, 2/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 9/24 variables, 15/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/24 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 24/24 variables, and 21 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved in 109 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 15/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/15 variables, 2/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 9/24 variables, 15/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 8/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/24 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 24/24 variables, and 29 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved in 122 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 15/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 247ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 247ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 316 ms. Remains : 15/15 places, 9/9 transitions.
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-00 finished in 4705 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F((X(F(p1))&&p0))))'
Found a Shortening insensitive property : PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-13
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 106 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Support contains 6 out of 31 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 77 edges and 31 vertex of which 24 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 7 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 7 places :
Also discarding 4 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 4 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Applied a total of 1 rules in 1 ms. Remains 23 /31 variables (removed 8) and now considering 12/16 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 12 rows 23 cols
[2024-06-01 14:20:12] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-01 14:20:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned [4, 6, 12, 15, 16, 17, 19]
[2024-06-01 14:20:12] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [4, 12, 15, 17]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 54 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 19/31 places, 12/16 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 18 /19 variables (removed 1) and now considering 11/12 (removed 1) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 56 ms. Remains : 18/31 places, 11/16 transitions.
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-13
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 78 steps with 4 reset in 0 ms.
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-13 finished in 281 ms.
Length sensitive decision was in the wrong direction : Shortening insensitive + false
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(!p0))'
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((X(F(p1))&&p0)))'
Found a Shortening insensitive property : PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-15
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 71 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Support contains 6 out of 31 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 16/16 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 77 edges and 31 vertex of which 28 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 3 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 3 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 2 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Applied a total of 1 rules in 2 ms. Remains 26 /31 variables (removed 5) and now considering 14/16 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 14 rows 26 cols
[2024-06-01 14:20:12] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 14:20:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned [5, 7, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18]
[2024-06-01 14:20:12] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [5, 12, 13, 14, 16]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 53 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 21/31 places, 14/16 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 20 transition count 12
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 19 transition count 12
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 19 transition count 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 18 transition count 11
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 17 transition count 10
Applied a total of 5 rules in 8 ms. Remains 17 /21 variables (removed 4) and now considering 10/14 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 10 rows 17 cols
[2024-06-01 14:20:12] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-06-01 14:20:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned [6, 8, 9]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 36 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 14/31 places, 10/16 transitions.
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 14 transition count 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 11 transition count 7
Applied a total of 6 rules in 3 ms. Remains 11 /14 variables (removed 3) and now considering 7/10 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 7 rows 11 cols
[2024-06-01 14:20:12] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-06-01 14:20:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 23 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 14:20:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:20:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 26 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 52 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 3 : 11/31 places, 7/16 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LI_LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 154 ms. Remains : 11/31 places, 7/16 transitions.
Running random walk in product with property : PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-15
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 6580 reset in 88 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 6596 reset in 98 ms.
Computed a total of 11 stabilizing places and 7 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 11 transition count 7
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 111 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 70 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 124 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (24 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0), (F p1)]
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 175 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 70 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 182 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
[2024-06-01 14:20:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:20:13] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:20:13] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 6 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:20:13] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 6/14/6 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 1 ms.
[2024-06-01 14:20:13] [INFO ] Added : 1 causal constraints over 1 iterations in 6 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
[2024-06-01 14:20:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:20:13] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:20:13] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 6 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:20:13] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 6/14/6 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 1 ms.
[2024-06-01 14:20:13] [INFO ] Added : 4 causal constraints over 1 iterations in 7 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p1)
Support contains 6 out of 11 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 11/11 places, 7/7 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 11 /11 variables (removed 0) and now considering 7/7 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 14:20:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:20:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 25 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 14:20:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:20:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 27 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 54 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 6 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 14:20:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/17 variables, 10/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/18 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/18 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 18/18 variables, and 15 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved in 80 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 11/11 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/17 variables, 10/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 6/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/18 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/18 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 18/18 variables, and 21 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved in 87 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 11/11 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 170ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 171ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 225 ms. Remains : 11/11 places, 7/7 transitions.
Computed a total of 11 stabilizing places and 7 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 11 transition count 7
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge : F ( (Ga|G!a) & (Gb|G!b)...)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 114 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 73 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
RANDOM walk for 124 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (24 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (G (NOT p0))), (F (G (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0), (F p1)]
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 169 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 73 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 69 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
[2024-06-01 14:20:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:20:14] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:20:14] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 5 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:20:14] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 6/14/6 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 1 ms.
[2024-06-01 14:20:14] [INFO ] Added : 1 causal constraints over 1 iterations in 6 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
[2024-06-01 14:20:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:20:14] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 0 positive and 4 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:20:14] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 7 ms returned sat
[2024-06-01 14:20:14] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 6/14/6 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 1 ms.
[2024-06-01 14:20:14] [INFO ] Added : 4 causal constraints over 1 iterations in 6 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p1)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 79 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 6529 reset in 85 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 6567 reset in 98 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [false, true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 75 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Support contains 6 out of 11 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 11/11 places, 7/7 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 11 /11 variables (removed 0) and now considering 7/7 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 14:20:14] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 6 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 14:20:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/17 variables, 10/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/18 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/18 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 18/18 variables, and 15 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved in 101 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 11/11 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/17 variables, 10/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 6/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/18 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/18 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 18/18 variables, and 21 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved in 85 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 11/11 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 191ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 192ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 198 ms. Remains : 11/11 places, 7/7 transitions.
Support contains 6 out of 11 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 11/11 places, 7/7 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 11 /11 variables (removed 0) and now considering 7/7 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-06-01 14:20:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:20:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 22 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 14:20:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 14:20:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 25 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 48 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 6 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 14:20:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/17 variables, 10/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/18 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/18 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 18/18 variables, and 15 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved in 88 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 11/11 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/17 variables, 10/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 6/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/18 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/18 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 18/18 variables, and 21 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved in 119 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 11/11 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 212ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 212ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 262 ms. Remains : 11/11 places, 7/7 transitions.
Treatment of property PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-15 finished in 3117 ms.
[2024-06-01 14:20:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 14:20:15] [INFO ] Export to MCC of 4 properties in file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.sr.xml took 2 ms.
[2024-06-01 14:20:15] [INFO ] Export to PNML in file /home/mcc/execution/model.sr.pnml of net with 31 places, 16 transitions and 72 arcs took 2 ms.
Total runtime 27386 ms.
There are residual formulas that ITS could not solve within timeout
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT PARALLEL_PROCESSING USE_NUPN
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT PARALLEL_PROCESSING USE_NUPN
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT PARALLEL_PROCESSING USE_NUPN
FORMULA PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT PARALLEL_PROCESSING USE_NUPN
BK_STOP 1717251616423
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -timeout 360 -rebuildPNML
mcc2024
ltl formula name PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-00
ltl formula formula --ltl=/tmp/2019/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading model from model.pnml
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Edge label is id
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Petri net has 31 places, 16 transitions and 72 arcs
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Petri net Petri analyzed
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): There are no safe places
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading Petri net took 0.000 real 0.000 user 0.000 sys
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/2019/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/2019/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 2/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/2019/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 3/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/2019/ltl_0_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): buchi has 3 states
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Weak Buchi automaton detected, adding non-accepting as progress label.
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): There are 33 state labels and 1 edge labels
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): State length is 32, there are 80 groups
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Running ufscc using 4 cores
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Using a tree table with 2^25 elements
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Successor permutation: dynamic
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Global bits: 0, count bits: 0, local bits: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Empty product with LTL!
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): total scc count: 7429
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): unique states count: 7429
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): unique transitions count: 96282
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - self-loop count: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim dead count: 94194
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim found count: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim success count: 7960
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - cum. max stack depth: 196
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Explored 7960 states 111668 transitions, fanout: 14.029
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Total exploration time 0.100 sec (0.100 sec minimum, 0.100 sec on average)
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): States per second: 79600, Transitions per second: 1116680
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Queue width: 12B, total height: 0, memory: 0.00MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Tree memory: 0.2MB, 25.2 B/state, compr.: 19.4%
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Tree fill ratio (roots/leafs): 0.0%/0.0%
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Stored 16 string chucks using 0MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Total memory used for chunk indexing: 0MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Est. total memory use: 0.2MB (~256.0MB paged-in)
ltl formula name PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-13
ltl formula formula --ltl=/tmp/2019/ltl_1_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading model from model.pnml
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Edge label is id
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Petri net has 31 places, 16 transitions and 72 arcs
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Petri net Petri analyzed
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): There are no safe places
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading Petri net took 0.010 real 0.000 user 0.000 sys
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/2019/ltl_1_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/2019/ltl_1_
pnml2lts-mc( 2/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/2019/ltl_1_
pnml2lts-mc( 3/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/2019/ltl_1_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): buchi has 3 states
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Weak Buchi automaton detected, adding non-accepting as progress label.
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): There are 33 state labels and 1 edge labels
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): State length is 32, there are 31 groups
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Running ufscc using 4 cores
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Using a tree table with 2^25 elements
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Successor permutation: dynamic
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Global bits: 0, count bits: 0, local bits: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Empty product with LTL!
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): total scc count: 11
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): unique states count: 11
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): unique transitions count: 14
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - self-loop count: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim dead count: 9
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim found count: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim success count: 21
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - cum. max stack depth: 15
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Explored 21 states 34 transitions, fanout: 1.619
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Total exploration time 0.000 sec (0.000 sec minimum, 0.000 sec on average)
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): States per second: inf, Transitions per second: inf
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Queue width: 12B, total height: 0, memory: 0.00MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Tree memory: 0.0MB, 85.1 B/state, compr.: 65.5%
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Tree fill ratio (roots/leafs): 0.0%/0.0%
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Stored 16 string chucks using 0MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Total memory used for chunk indexing: 0MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Est. total memory use: 0.0MB (~256.0MB paged-in)
ltl formula name PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-14
ltl formula formula --ltl=/tmp/2019/ltl_2_
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading model from model.pnml
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Edge label is id
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Petri net has 31 places, 16 transitions and 72 arcs
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Petri net Petri analyzed
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): There are no safe places
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading Petri net took 0.000 real 0.000 user 0.000 sys
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/2019/ltl_2_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/2019/ltl_2_
pnml2lts-mc( 2/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/2019/ltl_2_
pnml2lts-mc( 3/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/2019/ltl_2_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): buchi has 1 states
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Weak Buchi automaton detected, adding non-accepting as progress label.
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): There are 33 state labels and 1 edge labels
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): State length is 32, there are 19 groups
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Running ufscc using 4 cores
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Using a tree table with 2^25 elements
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Successor permutation: dynamic
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Global bits: 0, count bits: 0, local bits: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Empty product with LTL!
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): total scc count: 196
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): unique states count: 196
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): unique transitions count: 396
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - self-loop count: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim dead count: 223
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim found count: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim success count: 254
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - cum. max stack depth: 81
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Explored 254 states 586 transitions, fanout: 2.307
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Total exploration time 0.000 sec (0.000 sec minimum, 0.000 sec on average)
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): States per second: inf, Transitions per second: inf
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Queue width: 12B, total height: 0, memory: 0.00MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Tree memory: 0.0MB, 52.3 B/state, compr.: 40.3%
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Tree fill ratio (roots/leafs): 0.0%/0.0%
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Stored 16 string chucks using 0MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Total memory used for chunk indexing: 0MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Est. total memory use: 0.0MB (~256.0MB paged-in)
ltl formula name PermAdmissibility-COL-05-LTLFireability-15
ltl formula formula --ltl=/tmp/2019/ltl_3_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading model from model.pnml
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Edge label is id
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Petri net has 31 places, 16 transitions and 72 arcs
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Petri net Petri analyzed
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
Warning: program compiled against libxml 210 using older 209
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): There are no safe places
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Loading Petri net took 0.000 real 0.000 user 0.000 sys
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/2019/ltl_3_
pnml2lts-mc( 2/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/2019/ltl_3_
pnml2lts-mc( 1/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/2019/ltl_3_
pnml2lts-mc( 3/ 4): LTL layer: formula: /tmp/2019/ltl_3_
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): buchi has 2 states
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Weak Buchi automaton detected, adding non-accepting as progress label.
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): There are 33 state labels and 1 edge labels
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): State length is 32, there are 23 groups
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Running ufscc using 4 cores
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Using a tree table with 2^25 elements
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Successor permutation: dynamic
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Global bits: 0, count bits: 0, local bits: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 3/ 4): ~62 levels ~10000 states ~33248 transitions
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Empty product with LTL!
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): total scc count: 8502
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): unique states count: 8502
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): unique transitions count: 34012
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - self-loop count: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim dead count: 26937
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim found count: 0
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - claim success count: 9778
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): - cum. max stack depth: 241
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Explored 9778 states 40020 transitions, fanout: 4.093
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Total exploration time 0.080 sec (0.080 sec minimum, 0.080 sec on average)
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): States per second: 122225, Transitions per second: 500250
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4):
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Queue width: 12B, total height: 0, memory: 0.00MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Tree memory: 0.2MB, 24.8 B/state, compr.: 19.1%
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Tree fill ratio (roots/leafs): 0.0%/0.0%
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Stored 16 string chucks using 0MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Total memory used for chunk indexing: 0MB
pnml2lts-mc( 0/ 4): Est. total memory use: 0.2MB (~256.0MB paged-in)
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="PermAdmissibility-COL-05"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="ltsminxred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool ltsminxred"
echo " Input is PermAdmissibility-COL-05, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r512-smll-171654407000124"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/PermAdmissibility-COL-05.tgz
mv PermAdmissibility-COL-05 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;