About the Execution of LTSMin+red for HealthRecord-PT-11
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
744.096 | 26475.00 | 79335.00 | 80.60 | F | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r498-tall-171640618000488.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool ltsminxred
Input is HealthRecord-PT-11, examination is StableMarking
Time confinement is 1800 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r498-tall-171640618000488
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 432K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.1K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 63K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.0K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 42K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K May 19 07:10 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K May 19 15:57 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Apr 22 14:48 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 22 14:48 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.9K Apr 12 20:28 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 91K Apr 12 20:28 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.7K Apr 12 20:25 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 43K Apr 12 20:25 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 22 14:48 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 22 14:48 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 70K May 18 16:42 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
FORMULA_NAME StableMarking
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1717194022152
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=ltsminxred
BK_EXAMINATION=StableMarking
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=1800
BK_INPUT=HealthRecord-PT-11
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Applying reductions before tool ltsmin
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-31 22:20:23] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, StableMarking, -timeout, 180, -rebuildPNML]
[2024-05-31 22:20:23] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-31 22:20:23] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 73 ms
[2024-05-31 22:20:23] [INFO ] Transformed 159 places.
[2024-05-31 22:20:23] [INFO ] Transformed 334 transitions.
[2024-05-31 22:20:23] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-31 22:20:23] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 159 places and 334 transitions and 879 arcs in 194 ms.
Graph (trivial) has 270 edges and 159 vertex of which 10 / 159 are part of one of the 5 SCC in 4 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Structural test allowed to assert that 30 places are NOT stable. Took 34 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 32 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 32 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (3367 resets) in 2704 ms. (14 steps per ms) remains 57/129 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (47 resets) in 25 ms. (154 steps per ms) remains 57/57 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (44 resets) in 42 ms. (93 steps per ms) remains 57/57 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (42 resets) in 27 ms. (143 steps per ms) remains 57/57 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (43 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 56/57 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (40 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 56/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (43 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 56/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (43 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 56/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (45 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 56/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (42 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 56/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (42 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 56/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (40 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 56/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (45 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 56/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (44 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 56/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (42 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 56/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (40 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 56/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (42 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 56/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (41 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 56/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (45 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 56/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (46 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 56/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (43 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 56/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (45 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 56/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (44 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 56/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (45 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 56/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (45 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 56/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (43 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 56/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (40 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 56/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (42 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 56/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (42 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 56/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (43 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 56/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (46 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 56/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (44 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 56/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (42 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 56/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (41 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 56/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (44 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 56/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (45 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 56/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (42 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 56/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (43 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 56/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (42 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 56/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (45 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 56/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (40 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 56/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (42 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 56/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (43 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 56/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (42 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 55/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (41 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 55/55 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (44 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 55/55 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (39 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 55/55 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (45 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 55/55 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (42 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 55/55 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (42 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 44/55 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (44 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 44/44 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (43 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 44/44 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (42 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 44/44 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (43 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 44/44 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (41 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 44/44 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (41 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 44/44 properties
[2024-05-31 22:20:25] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 285 transitions (discarded 17 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 285 rows 154 cols
[2024-05-31 22:20:25] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 13 ms
[2024-05-31 22:20:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 52/96 variables, 10/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 52/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 58/154 variables, 8/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 58/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 284/438 variables, 154/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/438 variables, 0/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/439 variables, 1/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/439 variables, 0/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/439 variables, 0/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 439/439 variables, and 327 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved in 1622 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 154/154 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 52/96 variables, 10/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 52/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
[2024-05-31 22:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 39 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 20/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
[2024-05-31 22:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 3/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
[2024-05-31 22:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 40 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 2/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 58/154 variables, 8/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 58/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
[2024-05-31 22:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 62 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 20/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
[2024-05-31 22:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 43 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 63 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 213 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 17/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
[2024-05-31 22:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 63 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 66 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 61 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 74 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 6813ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 44 out of 154 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 302/302 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 667 edges and 154 vertex of which 145 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 9 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 9 places :
Also discarding 9 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 9 transitions
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 145 transition count 281
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 142 transition count 277
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 141 transition count 277
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 141 transition count 275
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 138 transition count 275
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 90 transition count 179
Iterating global reduction 3 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 90 transition count 179
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 127 place count 85 transition count 169
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 85 transition count 169
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 85 transition count 162
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -34
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 153 place count 78 transition count 196
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 7 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 7 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 78 transition count 189
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 13 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 13 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 78 transition count 189
Applied a total of 173 rules in 75 ms. Remains 78 /154 variables (removed 76) and now considering 189/302 (removed 113) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 91 ms. Remains : 78/154 places, 189/302 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 4000000 steps (684877 resets) in 21093 ms. (189 steps per ms) remains 11/44 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000004 steps (91971 resets) in 2586 ms. (1546 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000004 steps (91908 resets) in 2593 ms. (1542 steps per ms) remains 9/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000003 steps (91792 resets) in 2439 ms. (1639 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000003 steps (91900 resets) in 2410 ms. (1659 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000004 steps (91807 resets) in 4715 ms. (848 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000004 steps (91859 resets) in 3713 ms. (1077 steps per ms) remains 3/9 properties
[2024-05-31 22:20:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 174 transitions (discarded 15 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 174 rows 78 cols
[2024-05-31 22:20:43] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-31 22:20:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 13 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 11/14 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 64/78 variables, 7/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 174/252 variables, 78/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/252 variables, 13/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/252 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/252 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 252/252 variables, and 99 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 99 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 11/14 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 64/78 variables, 7/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 174/252 variables, 78/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/252 variables, 13/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/252 variables, 3/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/252 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/252 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 252/252 variables, and 102 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 154 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, ReadFeed: 13/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 274ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Fused 3 Parikh solutions to 2 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 68 ms.
Support contains 3 out of 78 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 189/189 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 78 transition count 188
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 77 transition count 188
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 50 transition count 134
Iterating global reduction 2 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 50 transition count 134
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 46 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 46 transition count 126
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 44 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 44 transition count 120
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 42 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 42 transition count 114
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 42 transition count 102
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 41 transition count 101
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -16
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 37 transition count 117
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 37 transition count 116
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 13 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 13 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 37 transition count 116
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 3 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 37 transition count 116
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 112 place count 36 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 36 transition count 110
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 114 place count 35 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 35 transition count 107
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 35 transition count 101
Applied a total of 121 rules in 29 ms. Remains 35 /78 variables (removed 43) and now considering 101/189 (removed 88) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 30 ms. Remains : 35/78 places, 101/189 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 4000000 steps (688305 resets) in 8545 ms. (468 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000003 steps (95068 resets) in 2564 ms. (1559 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000003 steps (95151 resets) in 1813 ms. (2205 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000003 steps (95241 resets) in 1999 ms. (2000 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 2865 steps, run visited all 3 properties in 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=124 )
Probabilistic random walk after 2865 steps, saw 1029 distinct states, run finished after 27 ms. (steps per millisecond=106 ) properties seen :3
Able to resolve query StableMarking after proving 131 properties.
FORMULA StableMarking FALSE TECHNIQUES RANDOM_WALK PROBABILISTIC_WALK MARKED_SUFFIX_TEST TRIVIAL_UNMARKED_SCC_TEST BESTFIRST_WALK TOPOLOGICAL
Total runtime 25223 ms.
ITS solved all properties within timeout
BK_STOP 1717194048627
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination StableMarking -timeout 180 -rebuildPNML
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="HealthRecord-PT-11"
export BK_EXAMINATION="StableMarking"
export BK_TOOL="ltsminxred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="1800"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool ltsminxred"
echo " Input is HealthRecord-PT-11, examination is StableMarking"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r498-tall-171640618000488"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/HealthRecord-PT-11.tgz
mv HealthRecord-PT-11 execution
cd execution
if [ "StableMarking" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "Liveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "StableMarking" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "StableMarking" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "StableMarking.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property StableMarking.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "StableMarking.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "StableMarking" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "Liveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME StableMarking"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;