About the Execution of LTSMin+red for HealthRecord-PT-11
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
458.575 | 50344.00 | 75528.00 | 159.80 | ???????????????T | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r496-tall-171640604200778.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool ltsminxred
Input is HealthRecord-PT-11, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r496-tall-171640604200778
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 432K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.1K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 63K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.0K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 42K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K May 19 07:10 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K May 19 15:57 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Apr 22 14:48 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 22 14:48 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.9K Apr 12 20:28 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 91K Apr 12 20:28 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.7K Apr 12 20:25 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 43K Apr 12 20:25 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 22 14:48 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 22 14:48 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 70K May 18 16:42 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2023-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1717201379192
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=ltsminxred
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=HealthRecord-PT-11
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Applying reductions before tool ltsmin
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-06-01 00:23:00] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -timeout, 360, -rebuildPNML]
[2024-06-01 00:23:00] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-06-01 00:23:00] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 80 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:00] [INFO ] Transformed 159 places.
[2024-06-01 00:23:00] [INFO ] Transformed 334 transitions.
[2024-06-01 00:23:00] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-06-01 00:23:00] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 159 places and 334 transitions and 879 arcs in 176 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 27 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 27 transitions.
Support contains 75 out of 159 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 159/159 places, 307/307 transitions.
Discarding 45 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 45 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 114 transition count 224
Iterating global reduction 0 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 114 transition count 224
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 92 place count 112 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 112 transition count 220
Applied a total of 94 rules in 25 ms. Remains 112 /159 variables (removed 47) and now considering 220/307 (removed 87) transitions.
[2024-06-01 00:23:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 215 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 215 rows 112 cols
[2024-06-01 00:23:00] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 15 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 204 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 00:23:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 215 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2024-06-01 00:23:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 00:23:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-01 00:23:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 131 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 368 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 219 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 00:23:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 215 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2024-06-01 00:23:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 00:23:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/112 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
[2024-06-01 00:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 19/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 214/326 variables, 112/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/327 variables, 1/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
[2024-06-01 00:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/327 variables, 1/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
[2024-06-01 00:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 62 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/327 variables, 4/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/327 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
[2024-06-01 00:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/327 variables, 1/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/327 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/327 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 327/327 variables, and 149 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved in 12938 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 112/112 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 219/219 constraints, Known Traps: 25/25 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/112 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 25/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
[2024-06-01 00:23:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 18/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
[2024-06-01 00:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 6/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
[2024-06-01 00:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 3/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
[2024-06-01 00:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 214/326 variables, 112/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 219/395 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
[2024-06-01 00:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 2/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
[2024-06-01 00:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 1/398 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 0/398 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 1/327 variables, 1/399 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/327 variables, 0/399 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/327 variables, 0/399 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 327/327 variables, and 399 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved in 25002 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 112/112 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 219/219 constraints, Known Traps: 56/56 constraints]
After SMT, in 38110ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 219 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38134ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 112/159 places, 220/307 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 38548 ms. Remains : 112/159 places, 220/307 transitions.
Support contains 75 out of 112 places after structural reductions.
[2024-06-01 00:23:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 50 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 220 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2654 resets) in 1626 ms. (24 steps per ms) remains 30/65 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (40 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (60 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (40 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (40 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (38 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (23 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (38 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (39 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (37 resets) in 7 ms. (500 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (42 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (35 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (34 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (37 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 29/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (38 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (37 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (39 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (34 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (37 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (38 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (34 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 27/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (23 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (41 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (37 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (38 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (36 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (36 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (23 resets) in 51 ms. (77 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (39 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (39 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
[2024-06-01 00:23:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 215 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2024-06-01 00:23:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 00:23:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 35/79 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 33/112 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
[2024-06-01 00:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp34 is UNSAT
[2024-06-01 00:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 41 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 19/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 26 unsolved
[2024-06-01 00:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 40 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp60 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 12/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 25 unsolved
[2024-06-01 00:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 3/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 214/326 variables, 112/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 25 unsolved
[2024-06-01 00:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 1/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 0/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/327 variables, 1/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/327 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/327 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 25 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 327/327 variables, and 159 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 25 unsolved in 2619 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 112/112 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps: 35/35 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 37/78 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 25 unsolved
[2024-06-01 00:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 25 unsolved
[2024-06-01 00:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 34/112 variables, 8/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 29/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 25 unsolved
[2024-06-01 00:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 40 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 7/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 214/326 variables, 112/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 25/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 25 unsolved
[2024-06-01 00:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 1/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 25 unsolved
[2024-06-01 00:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 1/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 0/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 1/327 variables, 1/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/327 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 25 unsolved
[2024-06-01 00:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 00:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/327 variables, 3/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/327 variables, 0/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/327 variables, 0/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 25 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 327/327 variables, and 200 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 25 unsolved in 4039 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 112/112 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 25/27 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints]
After SMT, in 6678ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 25 unsolved
Fused 25 Parikh solutions to 23 different solutions.
Finished Parikh walk after 3511 steps, including 111 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 6 ms. (steps per millisecond=585 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Parikh walk visited 25 properties in 1293 ms.
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 220 transitions.
Computed a total of 9 stabilizing places and 14 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 220/220 transitions.
Discarding 43 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 43 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 69 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 0 with 43 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 69 transition count 136
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 92 place count 63 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 63 transition count 124
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 63 transition count 118
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 105 place count 62 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 62 transition count 115
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 107 place count 61 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 61 transition count 113
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 61 transition count 111
Applied a total of 110 rules in 10 ms. Remains 61 /112 variables (removed 51) and now considering 111/220 (removed 109) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 10 ms. Remains : 61/112 places, 111/220 transitions.
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 111 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 220/220 transitions.
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 64 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 64 transition count 126
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 102 place count 58 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 58 transition count 113
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 58 transition count 104
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 119 place count 56 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 56 transition count 99
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 56 transition count 97
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 124 place count 55 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 55 transition count 95
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 55 transition count 92
Applied a total of 128 rules in 6 ms. Remains 55 /112 variables (removed 57) and now considering 92/220 (removed 128) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6 ms. Remains : 55/112 places, 92/220 transitions.
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 220/220 transitions.
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 64 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 64 transition count 126
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 104 place count 56 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 56 transition count 109
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 56 transition count 100
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 124 place count 53 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 53 transition count 92
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 53 transition count 89
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 131 place count 52 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 52 transition count 87
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 52 transition count 85
Applied a total of 134 rules in 8 ms. Remains 52 /112 variables (removed 60) and now considering 85/220 (removed 135) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8 ms. Remains : 52/112 places, 85/220 transitions.
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 85 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 220/220 transitions.
Discarding 49 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 49 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 63 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 0 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 63 transition count 124
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 105 place count 56 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 56 transition count 109
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 56 transition count 103
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 121 place count 53 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 53 transition count 95
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 53 transition count 92
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 129 place count 51 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 51 transition count 88
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 51 transition count 82
Applied a total of 137 rules in 6 ms. Remains 51 /112 variables (removed 61) and now considering 82/220 (removed 138) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7 ms. Remains : 51/112 places, 82/220 transitions.
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 220/220 transitions.
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 64 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 64 transition count 126
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 104 place count 56 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 56 transition count 109
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 56 transition count 100
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 124 place count 53 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 53 transition count 92
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 53 transition count 90
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 131 place count 51 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 51 transition count 86
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 51 transition count 80
Applied a total of 139 rules in 6 ms. Remains 51 /112 variables (removed 61) and now considering 80/220 (removed 140) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6 ms. Remains : 51/112 places, 80/220 transitions.
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 220/220 transitions.
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 65 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 65 transition count 128
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 58 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 58 transition count 113
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 58 transition count 107
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 117 place count 55 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 55 transition count 99
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 55 transition count 96
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 125 place count 53 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 53 transition count 92
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 53 transition count 86
Applied a total of 133 rules in 6 ms. Remains 53 /112 variables (removed 59) and now considering 86/220 (removed 134) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6 ms. Remains : 53/112 places, 86/220 transitions.
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 86 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 220/220 transitions.
Discarding 45 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 45 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 67 transition count 131
Iterating global reduction 0 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 67 transition count 131
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 98 place count 59 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 59 transition count 114
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 59 transition count 105
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 118 place count 56 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 56 transition count 97
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 56 transition count 95
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 125 place count 54 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 54 transition count 91
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 54 transition count 86
Applied a total of 132 rules in 4 ms. Remains 54 /112 variables (removed 58) and now considering 86/220 (removed 134) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5 ms. Remains : 54/112 places, 86/220 transitions.
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 86 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 220/220 transitions.
Discarding 43 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 43 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 69 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 0 with 43 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 69 transition count 135
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 92 place count 63 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 63 transition count 123
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 63 transition count 118
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 104 place count 62 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 62 transition count 115
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 106 place count 61 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 61 transition count 113
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 61 transition count 110
Applied a total of 110 rules in 5 ms. Remains 61 /112 variables (removed 51) and now considering 110/220 (removed 110) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5 ms. Remains : 61/112 places, 110/220 transitions.
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 110 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 220/220 transitions.
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 64 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 64 transition count 126
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 102 place count 58 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 58 transition count 114
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 58 transition count 109
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 115 place count 56 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 56 transition count 103
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 119 place count 54 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 54 transition count 99
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 54 transition count 93
Applied a total of 127 rules in 4 ms. Remains 54 /112 variables (removed 58) and now considering 93/220 (removed 127) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4 ms. Remains : 54/112 places, 93/220 transitions.
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 220/220 transitions.
Discarding 40 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 40 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 72 transition count 142
Iterating global reduction 0 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 72 transition count 142
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 85 place count 67 transition count 132
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 67 transition count 132
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 67 transition count 124
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 99 place count 66 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 66 transition count 121
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 65 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 65 transition count 119
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 65 transition count 116
Applied a total of 105 rules in 3 ms. Remains 65 /112 variables (removed 47) and now considering 116/220 (removed 104) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 65/112 places, 116/220 transitions.
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 116 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 220/220 transitions.
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 65 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 65 transition count 128
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 58 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 58 transition count 114
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 58 transition count 106
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 118 place count 56 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 56 transition count 100
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 122 place count 54 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 54 transition count 96
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 54 transition count 90
Applied a total of 130 rules in 2 ms. Remains 54 /112 variables (removed 58) and now considering 90/220 (removed 130) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 54/112 places, 90/220 transitions.
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 90 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 220/220 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 156 edges and 112 vertex of which 10 / 112 are part of one of the 5 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 45 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 45 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 61 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 61 transition count 126
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 100 place count 52 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 52 transition count 107
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 52 transition count 97
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 122 place count 49 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 49 transition count 89
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 49 transition count 86
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 130 place count 47 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 47 transition count 82
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 47 transition count 76
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 4 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 47 transition count 72
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 45 transition count 70
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 43 transition count 68
Applied a total of 148 rules in 29 ms. Remains 43 /112 variables (removed 69) and now considering 68/220 (removed 152) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 29 ms. Remains : 43/112 places, 68/220 transitions.
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 68 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 220/220 transitions.
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 74 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 74 transition count 146
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 69 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 69 transition count 135
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 69 transition count 130
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 92 place count 68 transition count 127
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 68 transition count 127
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 94 place count 67 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 67 transition count 125
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 67 transition count 124
Applied a total of 96 rules in 3 ms. Remains 67 /112 variables (removed 45) and now considering 124/220 (removed 96) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 67/112 places, 124/220 transitions.
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 124 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 220/220 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 114 edges and 112 vertex of which 10 / 112 are part of one of the 5 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 45 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 45 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 61 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 61 transition count 126
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 100 place count 52 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 52 transition count 107
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 52 transition count 98
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 121 place count 49 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 49 transition count 90
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 49 transition count 87
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 129 place count 47 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 47 transition count 83
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 47 transition count 77
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 4 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 47 transition count 73
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 45 transition count 71
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 43 transition count 69
Applied a total of 147 rules in 15 ms. Remains 43 /112 variables (removed 69) and now considering 69/220 (removed 151) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 15 ms. Remains : 43/112 places, 69/220 transitions.
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 69 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 220/220 transitions.
Discarding 45 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 45 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 67 transition count 132
Iterating global reduction 0 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 67 transition count 132
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 96 place count 61 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 61 transition count 120
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 61 transition count 114
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 110 place count 59 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 59 transition count 108
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 114 place count 57 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 57 transition count 104
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 57 transition count 98
Applied a total of 122 rules in 2 ms. Remains 57 /112 variables (removed 55) and now considering 98/220 (removed 122) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 57/112 places, 98/220 transitions.
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 220/220 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 156 edges and 112 vertex of which 10 / 112 are part of one of the 5 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 45 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 45 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 61 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 61 transition count 126
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 100 place count 52 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 52 transition count 107
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 52 transition count 97
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 121 place count 50 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 50 transition count 92
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 50 transition count 89
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 127 place count 49 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 49 transition count 87
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 49 transition count 84
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 4 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 49 transition count 80
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 47 transition count 78
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 45 transition count 76
Applied a total of 141 rules in 15 ms. Remains 45 /112 variables (removed 67) and now considering 76/220 (removed 144) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 15 ms. Remains : 45/112 places, 76/220 transitions.
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 76 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (4047 resets) in 364 ms. (109 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (568 resets) in 27 ms. (1428 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 65540 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 107 ms. (steps per millisecond=612 )
Probabilistic random walk after 65540 steps, saw 10891 distinct states, run finished after 110 ms. (steps per millisecond=595 ) properties seen :1
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL PROBABILISTIC_WALK
[2024-06-01 00:23:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-06-01 00:23:49] [INFO ] Export to MCC of 15 properties in file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.sr.xml took 4 ms.
[2024-06-01 00:23:49] [INFO ] Export to PNML in file /home/mcc/execution/model.sr.pnml of net with 112 places, 220 transitions and 629 arcs took 4 ms.
Total runtime 48747 ms.
There are residual formulas that ITS could not solve within timeout
Usage: pnml2lts-sym [-gvqh] [--order=
[--mu-opt] [--saturation=
[--sat-granularity=
[--guidance=
[--action=
[--trace=
[--mu=
[--ctl=
[--save-levels=STRING] [--pg-solve] [--attr=
[--saturating-attractor] [--write-strategy=
[--check-strategy] [--interactive-play] [--player]
[--pg-write=
[--edge-label=
[--mucalc=
[--allow-undefined-edges] [--allow-undefined-values]
[-p|--por=
[--weak=[valmari] (default: uses stronger left-commutativity)]
[--leap] [-r|--regroup=<(T,)+>] [--sloan-w1=
[--cw-max-cols=
[--mh-timeout=
[--graph-metrics] [--regroup-exit] [--regroup-time]
[-g|--pins-guards] [--vset=
[--ldd32-cache=
[--cache-ratio=
[--min-free-nodes=
[--fdd-reorder=
[--vset-cache-diff=
[--next-union] [--peak-nodes] [--maxsum=
[--block-size=
[--debug=
[--timeout=INT] [--version] [-h|--help] [--usage]
[OPTIONS]
Could not compute solution for formula : HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2024-00
Could not compute solution for formula : HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2024-01
Could not compute solution for formula : HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2024-02
Could not compute solution for formula : HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2024-03
Could not compute solution for formula : HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2024-04
Could not compute solution for formula : HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2024-05
Could not compute solution for formula : HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2024-06
Could not compute solution for formula : HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2024-07
Could not compute solution for formula : HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2024-08
Could not compute solution for formula : HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2024-09
Could not compute solution for formula : HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2024-10
Could not compute solution for formula : HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2024-11
Could not compute solution for formula : HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2023-12
Could not compute solution for formula : HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2023-13
Could not compute solution for formula : HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2023-14
BK_STOP 1717201429536
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ sed s/.jar//
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -timeout 360 -rebuildPNML
mcc2024
ctl formula name HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2024-00
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/846/ctl_0_
ctl formula name HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2024-01
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/846/ctl_1_
ctl formula name HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2024-02
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/846/ctl_2_
ctl formula name HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2024-03
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/846/ctl_3_
ctl formula name HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2024-04
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/846/ctl_4_
ctl formula name HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2024-05
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/846/ctl_5_
ctl formula name HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2024-06
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/846/ctl_6_
ctl formula name HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2024-07
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/846/ctl_7_
ctl formula name HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2024-08
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/846/ctl_8_
ctl formula name HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2024-09
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/846/ctl_9_
ctl formula name HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2024-10
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/846/ctl_10_
ctl formula name HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2024-11
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/846/ctl_11_
ctl formula name HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2023-12
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/846/ctl_12_
ctl formula name HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2023-13
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/846/ctl_13_
ctl formula name HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2023-14
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/846/ctl_14_
pnml2lts-sym, ** error **: unknown vector set implementation lddmc
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="HealthRecord-PT-11"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="ltsminxred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool ltsminxred"
echo " Input is HealthRecord-PT-11, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r496-tall-171640604200778"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/HealthRecord-PT-11.tgz
mv HealthRecord-PT-11 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;