fond
Model Checking Contest 2024
14th edition, Geneva, Switzerland, June 25, 2024
Execution of r488-tall-171631132800484
Last Updated
July 7, 2024

About the Execution of LTSMin+red for DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
625.823 280040.00 339451.00 803.50 TFFFFFFFFFFTFTFT normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r488-tall-171631132800484.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool ltsminxred
Input is DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r488-tall-171631132800484
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 532K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.9K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 87K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.9K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 69K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K May 19 07:08 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K May 19 15:46 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K May 19 07:16 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 19 18:14 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Apr 12 02:04 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 112K Apr 12 02:04 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.0K Apr 12 02:03 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 35K Apr 12 02:03 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Apr 22 14:41 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 22 14:41 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 97K May 18 16:42 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1717193155171

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=ltsminxred
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Applying reductions before tool ltsmin
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-31 22:05:56] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -timeout, 360, -rebuildPNML]
[2024-05-31 22:05:56] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-31 22:05:56] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 86 ms
[2024-05-31 22:05:56] [INFO ] Transformed 380 places.
[2024-05-31 22:05:56] [INFO ] Transformed 404 transitions.
[2024-05-31 22:05:56] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-31 22:05:56] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 380 places and 404 transitions and 1056 arcs in 204 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 4 formulas.
FORMULA DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 29 out of 380 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 380/380 places, 404/404 transitions.
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 354 transition count 404
Discarding 63 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 63 rule applications. Total rules 89 place count 291 transition count 341
Iterating global reduction 1 with 63 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 291 transition count 341
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 164 place count 279 transition count 329
Iterating global reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 176 place count 279 transition count 329
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 187 place count 268 transition count 318
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 198 place count 268 transition count 318
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 209 place count 257 transition count 307
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 220 place count 257 transition count 307
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 229 place count 248 transition count 289
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 248 transition count 289
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 245 place count 241 transition count 282
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 241 transition count 282
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 258 place count 235 transition count 276
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 264 place count 235 transition count 276
Applied a total of 264 rules in 109 ms. Remains 235 /380 variables (removed 145) and now considering 276/404 (removed 128) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 276 rows 235 cols
[2024-05-31 22:05:56] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 23 ms
[2024-05-31 22:05:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 233 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 22:05:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 22:05:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 171 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 434 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 275 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-31 22:05:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 275 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/235 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 275 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 275 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 276/511 variables, 235/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 275 unsolved
[2024-05-31 22:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 107 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 81 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 85 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 81 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 74 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 73 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 67 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 67 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 64 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 67 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 66 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 65 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 66 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/511 variables, 20/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 275 unsolved
[2024-05-31 22:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 76 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/511 variables, 3/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 275 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/511 variables, 0/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 275 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/511 variables, 0/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 275 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 511/511 variables, and 260 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 275 unsolved in 14459 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 235/235 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 275/275 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 275 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 275 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/235 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 275 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 23/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 275 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 275 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 276/511 variables, 235/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 275 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/511 variables, 275/535 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 275 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/511 variables, 0/535 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 275 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/511 variables, 0/535 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 275 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 511/511 variables, and 535 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 275 unsolved in 15720 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 235/235 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 275/275 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints]
After SMT, in 30361ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 275 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30377ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 235/380 places, 276/404 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30940 ms. Remains : 235/380 places, 276/404 transitions.
Support contains 29 out of 235 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-31 22:06:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 45 ms
[2024-05-31 22:06:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2024-05-31 22:06:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 276 transitions.
Support contains 28 out of 235 places (down from 29) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 31031 steps (70 resets) in 1113 ms. (27 steps per ms) remains 0/24 properties
Computed a total of 43 stabilizing places and 43 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 467 edges and 235 vertex of which 233 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.6 ms
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((G(F(p0))||(F(p0)&&X(p1)))))'
Support contains 2 out of 235 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 235/235 places, 276/276 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 223 transition count 263
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 223 transition count 263
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 218 transition count 257
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 218 transition count 257
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 215 transition count 254
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 215 transition count 254
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 213 transition count 252
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 213 transition count 252
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 212 transition count 250
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 212 transition count 250
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 211 transition count 249
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 211 transition count 249
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 210 transition count 248
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 210 transition count 248
Applied a total of 50 rules in 28 ms. Remains 210 /235 variables (removed 25) and now considering 248/276 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 248 rows 210 cols
[2024-05-31 22:06:28] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-31 22:06:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 76 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 22:06:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 22:06:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 206 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 286 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 247 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-31 22:06:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/210 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 248/458 variables, 210/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
[2024-05-31 22:06:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 60 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 17/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 0/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/458 variables, 0/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 458/458 variables, and 229 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved in 10989 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 210/210 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 247/247 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/210 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 17/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 248/458 variables, 210/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 247/476 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 0/476 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/458 variables, 0/476 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 458/458 variables, and 476 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved in 11520 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 210/210 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 247/247 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints]
After SMT, in 22634ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 22638ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 210/235 places, 248/276 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 22954 ms. Remains : 210/235 places, 248/276 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 222 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-00
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 217 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 128 ms.
Computed a total of 41 stabilizing places and 41 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 427 edges and 210 vertex of which 209 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.5 ms
Computed a total of 41 stabilizing places and 41 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p1), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 17 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-00 finished in 23637 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(p0)||X(G(p1))))'
Support contains 2 out of 235 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 235/235 places, 276/276 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 225 transition count 265
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 225 transition count 265
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 220 transition count 259
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 220 transition count 259
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 217 transition count 256
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 217 transition count 256
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 215 transition count 254
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 215 transition count 254
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 214 transition count 252
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 214 transition count 252
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 213 transition count 251
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 213 transition count 251
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 212 transition count 250
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 212 transition count 250
Applied a total of 46 rules in 35 ms. Remains 212 /235 variables (removed 23) and now considering 250/276 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 250 rows 212 cols
[2024-05-31 22:06:52] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-31 22:06:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 128 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 22:06:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 22:06:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 131 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 261 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 249 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-31 22:06:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/212 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 250/462 variables, 212/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved
[2024-05-31 22:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 63 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 20/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved
[2024-05-31 22:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 64 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 2/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 0/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/462 variables, 0/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 462/462 variables, and 236 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved in 11594 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 212/212 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 249/249 constraints, Known Traps: 22/22 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/212 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 22/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 250/462 variables, 212/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 249/485 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 0/485 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/462 variables, 0/485 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 462/462 variables, and 485 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved in 11937 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 212/212 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 249/249 constraints, Known Traps: 22/22 constraints]
After SMT, in 23625ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 23629ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 212/235 places, 250/276 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 23927 ms. Remains : 212/235 places, 250/276 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 158 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-01
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-01 finished in 24104 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 235 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 235/235 places, 276/276 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 225 transition count 265
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 225 transition count 265
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 220 transition count 259
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 220 transition count 259
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 217 transition count 256
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 217 transition count 256
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 215 transition count 254
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 215 transition count 254
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 214 transition count 252
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 214 transition count 252
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 213 transition count 251
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 213 transition count 251
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 212 transition count 250
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 212 transition count 250
Applied a total of 46 rules in 16 ms. Remains 212 /235 variables (removed 23) and now considering 250/276 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 250 rows 212 cols
[2024-05-31 22:07:16] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-31 22:07:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 22:07:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 22:07:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 120 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 191 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 249 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-31 22:07:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/212 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 250/462 variables, 212/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved
[2024-05-31 22:07:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 20/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved
[2024-05-31 22:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 3/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 0/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/462 variables, 0/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 462/462 variables, and 237 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved in 11456 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 212/212 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 249/249 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/212 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 23/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 250/462 variables, 212/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 249/486 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 0/486 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/462 variables, 0/486 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 462/462 variables, and 486 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved in 13663 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 212/212 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 249/249 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints]
After SMT, in 25192ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 249 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 25197ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 212/235 places, 250/276 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 25405 ms. Remains : 212/235 places, 250/276 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 90 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-02
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 7096 steps with 16 reset in 20 ms.
FORMULA DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-02 finished in 25528 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((G(p0) U (p1&&F(p2)))))'
Support contains 3 out of 235 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 235/235 places, 276/276 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 226 transition count 266
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 226 transition count 266
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 222 transition count 262
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 222 transition count 262
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 220 transition count 260
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 220 transition count 260
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 219 transition count 259
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 219 transition count 259
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 218 transition count 257
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 218 transition count 257
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 217 transition count 256
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 217 transition count 256
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 216 transition count 255
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 216 transition count 255
Applied a total of 38 rules in 17 ms. Remains 216 /235 variables (removed 19) and now considering 255/276 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 255 rows 216 cols
[2024-05-31 22:07:41] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-31 22:07:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 22:07:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 22:07:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 126 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 207 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 254 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-31 22:07:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/216 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 255/471 variables, 216/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
[2024-05-31 22:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 61 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 64 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/471 variables, 20/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
[2024-05-31 22:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 63 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/471 variables, 4/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/471 variables, 0/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/471 variables, 0/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 471/471 variables, and 242 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved in 11798 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 216/216 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 254/254 constraints, Known Traps: 24/24 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/216 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 24/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 255/471 variables, 216/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/471 variables, 254/496 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/471 variables, 0/496 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/471 variables, 0/496 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 471/471 variables, and 496 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved in 13779 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 216/216 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 254/254 constraints, Known Traps: 24/24 constraints]
After SMT, in 25657ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 25660ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 216/235 places, 255/276 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 25885 ms. Remains : 216/235 places, 255/276 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 168 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), true, (NOT p0), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-05
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-05 finished in 26077 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 235 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 235/235 places, 276/276 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 223 transition count 263
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 223 transition count 263
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 218 transition count 257
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 218 transition count 257
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 215 transition count 254
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 215 transition count 254
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 213 transition count 252
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 213 transition count 252
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 212 transition count 250
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 212 transition count 250
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 211 transition count 249
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 211 transition count 249
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 210 transition count 248
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 210 transition count 248
Applied a total of 50 rules in 11 ms. Remains 210 /235 variables (removed 25) and now considering 248/276 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 248 rows 210 cols
[2024-05-31 22:08:07] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-31 22:08:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 22:08:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 22:08:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 130 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 202 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 247 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-31 22:08:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/210 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 248/458 variables, 210/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
[2024-05-31 22:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 65 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 59 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 66 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 17/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 0/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/458 variables, 0/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 458/458 variables, and 229 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved in 11114 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 210/210 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 247/247 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/210 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 17/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 248/458 variables, 210/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 247/476 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 0/476 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/458 variables, 0/476 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 458/458 variables, and 476 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved in 12085 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 210/210 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 247/247 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints]
After SMT, in 23280ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 23283ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 210/235 places, 248/276 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 23497 ms. Remains : 210/235 places, 248/276 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 75 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-06
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-06 finished in 23589 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G((F(p1)&&p0))))'
Support contains 4 out of 235 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 235/235 places, 276/276 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 223 transition count 263
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 223 transition count 263
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 218 transition count 257
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 218 transition count 257
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 215 transition count 254
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 215 transition count 254
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 213 transition count 252
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 213 transition count 252
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 212 transition count 250
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 212 transition count 250
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 211 transition count 249
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 211 transition count 249
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 210 transition count 248
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 210 transition count 248
Applied a total of 50 rules in 11 ms. Remains 210 /235 variables (removed 25) and now considering 248/276 (removed 28) transitions.
[2024-05-31 22:08:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 22:08:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 22:08:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 22:08:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 112 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 175 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 247 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-31 22:08:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/210 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 248/458 variables, 210/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
[2024-05-31 22:08:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:08:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:08:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:08:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:08:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:08:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:08:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 67 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:08:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:08:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:08:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:08:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:08:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:08:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:08:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:08:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:08:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:08:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 17/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 0/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/458 variables, 0/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 458/458 variables, and 229 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved in 11005 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 210/210 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 247/247 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/210 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 17/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 248/458 variables, 210/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 247/476 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 0/476 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/458 variables, 0/476 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 458/458 variables, and 476 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved in 11873 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 210/210 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 247/247 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints]
After SMT, in 22961ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 22964ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 210/235 places, 248/276 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 23152 ms. Remains : 210/235 places, 248/276 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 131 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), true, (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-07
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-07 finished in 23296 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 235 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 235/235 places, 276/276 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 467 edges and 235 vertex of which 233 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.7 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 38 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 38 transitions
Performed 38 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 38
Iterating post reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 232 transition count 235
Reduce places removed 38 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 194 transition count 235
Performed 37 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 37 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 194 transition count 198
Deduced a syphon composed of 37 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 37 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 74 rules applied. Total rules applied 151 place count 157 transition count 198
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 157 place count 151 transition count 191
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 151 transition count 191
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 165 place count 149 transition count 189
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 167 place count 149 transition count 189
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 168 place count 148 transition count 188
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 148 transition count 188
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 170 place count 147 transition count 186
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 171 place count 147 transition count 186
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 172 place count 146 transition count 185
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 146 transition count 185
Performed 59 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 59
Deduced a syphon composed of 59 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 59 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 118 rules applied. Total rules applied 291 place count 87 transition count 126
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 303 place count 75 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 315 place count 75 transition count 102
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 327 place count 63 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 339 place count 63 transition count 89
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 350 place count 52 transition count 68
Iterating global reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 361 place count 52 transition count 68
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 372 place count 41 transition count 56
Iterating global reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 383 place count 41 transition count 56
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 394 place count 30 transition count 35
Iterating global reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 405 place count 30 transition count 35
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 416 place count 19 transition count 23
Iterating global reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 427 place count 19 transition count 23
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 428 place count 18 transition count 22
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 429 place count 18 transition count 22
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 430 place count 18 transition count 21
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 432 place count 16 transition count 19
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 434 place count 15 transition count 18
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 435 place count 14 transition count 18
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 435 place count 14 transition count 16
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 439 place count 12 transition count 16
Applied a total of 439 rules in 67 ms. Remains 12 /235 variables (removed 223) and now considering 16/276 (removed 260) transitions.
[2024-05-31 22:08:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 14 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 14 rows 12 cols
[2024-05-31 22:08:54] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-31 22:08:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 22:08:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 14 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2024-05-31 22:08:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 22:08:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-31 22:08:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 21 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 54 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 22:08:54] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 15 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-31 22:08:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 14 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2024-05-31 22:08:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 22:08:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/12 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 14/26 variables, 12/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/26 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 26/26 variables, and 14 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved in 211 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 12/12 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/12 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 14/26 variables, 12/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 15/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/26 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 26/26 variables, and 29 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved in 103 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 12/12 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 319ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 15 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 319ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 12/235 places, 16/276 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 444 ms. Remains : 12/235 places, 16/276 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 29 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-08
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 664 reset in 202 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 481 steps with 3 reset with depth 21 and stack size 19 in 2 ms.
FORMULA DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-08 finished in 691 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(X(X((((X(p0) U p1)&&F(G(p1))) U p2)))))'
Support contains 4 out of 235 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 235/235 places, 276/276 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 226 transition count 267
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 226 transition count 267
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 224 transition count 264
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 224 transition count 264
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 222 transition count 262
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 222 transition count 262
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 220 transition count 260
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 220 transition count 260
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 219 transition count 258
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 219 transition count 258
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 218 transition count 257
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 218 transition count 257
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 217 transition count 256
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 217 transition count 256
Applied a total of 36 rules in 30 ms. Remains 217 /235 variables (removed 18) and now considering 256/276 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 256 rows 217 cols
[2024-05-31 22:08:55] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-31 22:08:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 249 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 22:08:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 22:08:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 115 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 366 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 255 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-31 22:08:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/217 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 256/473 variables, 217/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
[2024-05-31 22:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 60 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 61 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 20/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
[2024-05-31 22:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 62 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 3/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 0/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/473 variables, 0/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 473/473 variables, and 242 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved in 11894 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 217/217 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 255/255 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/216 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/217 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 23/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 256/473 variables, 217/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 255/497 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 0/497 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/473 variables, 0/497 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 473/473 variables, and 497 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved in 13591 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 217/217 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 255/255 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints]
After SMT, in 25573ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 25576ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 217/235 places, 256/276 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 25973 ms. Remains : 217/235 places, 256/276 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 260 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p2), true]
Running random walk in product with property : DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-09
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 418 steps with 0 reset in 2 ms.
FORMULA DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-09 finished in 26257 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(p0) U X(p1)))'
Support contains 3 out of 235 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 235/235 places, 276/276 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 223 transition count 263
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 223 transition count 263
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 218 transition count 257
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 218 transition count 257
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 215 transition count 254
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 215 transition count 254
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 213 transition count 252
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 213 transition count 252
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 212 transition count 250
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 212 transition count 250
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 211 transition count 249
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 211 transition count 249
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 210 transition count 248
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 210 transition count 248
Applied a total of 50 rules in 31 ms. Remains 210 /235 variables (removed 25) and now considering 248/276 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 248 rows 210 cols
[2024-05-31 22:09:21] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-31 22:09:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 22:09:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 22:09:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 114 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 195 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 247 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-31 22:09:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/210 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 248/458 variables, 210/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
[2024-05-31 22:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 17/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 0/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/458 variables, 0/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 458/458 variables, and 229 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved in 10853 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 210/210 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 247/247 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/210 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 17/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 248/458 variables, 210/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 247/476 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/458 variables, 0/476 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/458 variables, 0/476 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 458/458 variables, and 476 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved in 11596 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 210/210 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 247/247 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints]
After SMT, in 22535ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 22538ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 210/235 places, 248/276 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 22764 ms. Remains : 210/235 places, 248/276 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 149 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), true, (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-11
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 113 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 150 ms.
Computed a total of 41 stabilizing places and 41 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 427 edges and 210 vertex of which 209 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Computed a total of 41 stabilizing places and 41 stable transitions
Detected a total of 41/210 stabilizing places and 41/248 transitions leading to convergence knowledge of the form 'F(Gp|G!p)' for 1/2 atomic propositions.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1)), (F (OR (G p1) (G (NOT p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 10 factoid took 13 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 9 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-11 finished in 23214 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((p0&&F((p1&&X(X(p2)))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 235 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 235/235 places, 276/276 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 224 transition count 264
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 224 transition count 264
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 221 transition count 261
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 221 transition count 261
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 220 transition count 260
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 220 transition count 260
Applied a total of 30 rules in 16 ms. Remains 220 /235 variables (removed 15) and now considering 260/276 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 260 rows 220 cols
[2024-05-31 22:09:45] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-31 22:09:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 22:09:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 22:09:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 133 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 205 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 259 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-31 22:09:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/220 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 260/480 variables, 220/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
[2024-05-31 22:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 68 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 63 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 61 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 20/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
[2024-05-31 22:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 63 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 3/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/480 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 480/480 variables, and 245 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved in 12325 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 220/220 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 259/259 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/220 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 23/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 260/480 variables, 220/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 259/504 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/480 variables, 0/504 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/480 variables, 0/504 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 480/480 variables, and 504 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved in 12318 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 220/220 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 259/259 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints]
After SMT, in 24736ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 24743ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 220/235 places, 260/276 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 24965 ms. Remains : 220/235 places, 260/276 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 250 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), true]
Running random walk in product with property : DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-12
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-12 finished in 25260 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F((p0 U (p1||G(p0))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 235 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 235/235 places, 276/276 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 467 edges and 235 vertex of which 233 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 37 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 37 transitions
Performed 37 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 37
Iterating post reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 232 transition count 236
Reduce places removed 37 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 195 transition count 236
Performed 36 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 36 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 195 transition count 200
Deduced a syphon composed of 36 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 72 rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 159 transition count 200
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 153 place count 153 transition count 193
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 159 place count 153 transition count 193
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 161 place count 151 transition count 191
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 151 transition count 191
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 164 place count 150 transition count 190
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 150 transition count 190
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 166 place count 149 transition count 188
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 167 place count 149 transition count 188
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 168 place count 148 transition count 187
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 148 transition count 187
Performed 58 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 58
Deduced a syphon composed of 58 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 58 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 116 rules applied. Total rules applied 285 place count 90 transition count 129
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 297 place count 78 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 309 place count 78 transition count 105
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 321 place count 66 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 333 place count 66 transition count 92
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 344 place count 55 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 355 place count 55 transition count 71
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 366 place count 44 transition count 59
Iterating global reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 377 place count 44 transition count 59
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 387 place count 34 transition count 40
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 397 place count 34 transition count 40
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 407 place count 24 transition count 29
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 417 place count 24 transition count 29
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 418 place count 23 transition count 28
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 419 place count 23 transition count 28
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 420 place count 23 transition count 27
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 421 place count 23 transition count 27
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 423 place count 21 transition count 25
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 425 place count 20 transition count 24
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 426 place count 19 transition count 24
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 426 place count 19 transition count 21
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 432 place count 16 transition count 21
Applied a total of 432 rules in 42 ms. Remains 16 /235 variables (removed 219) and now considering 21/276 (removed 255) transitions.
[2024-05-31 22:10:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 19 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 19 rows 16 cols
[2024-05-31 22:10:10] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-31 22:10:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 23 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 22:10:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 19 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2024-05-31 22:10:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 22:10:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-31 22:10:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 24 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 48 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 22:10:10] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 20 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-31 22:10:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 19 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2024-05-31 22:10:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 22:10:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/16 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 19/35 variables, 16/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/35 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 35/35 variables, and 18 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved in 145 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 16/16 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/16 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 19/35 variables, 16/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 20/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/35 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 35/35 variables, and 38 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved in 160 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 16/16 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 316ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 317ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 16/235 places, 21/276 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 418 ms. Remains : 16/235 places, 21/276 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 65 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-14
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 894 reset in 195 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 2242 steps with 22 reset with depth 16 and stack size 16 in 5 ms.
FORMULA DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-14 finished in 698 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((!p0||X(F(p1))) U (G((!p0||X(F(p1))))||((!p0||X(F(p1)))&&X(p0)))))'
Support contains 3 out of 235 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 235/235 places, 276/276 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 224 transition count 264
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 224 transition count 264
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 219 transition count 258
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 219 transition count 258
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 216 transition count 255
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 216 transition count 255
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 214 transition count 253
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 214 transition count 253
Applied a total of 42 rules in 12 ms. Remains 214 /235 variables (removed 21) and now considering 253/276 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 253 rows 214 cols
[2024-05-31 22:10:10] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-31 22:10:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 22:10:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 22:10:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 159 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 248 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 252 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-31 22:10:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/214 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 253/467 variables, 214/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
[2024-05-31 22:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 64 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:10:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:10:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:10:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:10:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 67 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:10:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:10:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:10:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:10:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:10:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 22:10:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 17/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 0/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/467 variables, 0/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 467/467 variables, and 233 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved in 11461 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 214/214 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 252/252 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/214 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 17/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 253/467 variables, 214/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 252/485 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 0/485 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/467 variables, 0/485 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 467/467 variables, and 485 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved in 12275 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 214/214 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 252/252 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints]
After SMT, in 23825ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 23828ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 214/235 places, 253/276 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 24091 ms. Remains : 214/235 places, 253/276 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 78 ms :[(NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-15
Initial state of product has no viable successors after 0 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b-LTLFireability-15 finished in 24185 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 278841 ms.
ITS solved all properties within timeout

BK_STOP 1717193435211

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -timeout 360 -rebuildPNML

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="ltsminxred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool ltsminxred"
echo " Input is DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r488-tall-171631132800484"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b.tgz
mv DiscoveryGPU-PT-13b execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;