About the Execution of LTSMin+red for CSRepetitions-COL-05
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
355.848 | 9709.00 | 21782.00 | 57.90 | [undef] | Cannot compute |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r476-tall-171620505400202.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...............
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool ltsminxred
Input is CSRepetitions-COL-05, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r476-tall-171620505400202
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 456K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K Apr 12 09:27 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 54K Apr 12 09:27 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.7K Apr 12 09:23 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 42K Apr 12 09:23 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.4K Apr 22 14:32 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K Apr 22 14:32 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.7K Apr 22 14:32 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 22 14:32 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K Apr 12 09:49 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 104K Apr 12 09:49 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K Apr 12 09:45 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 96K Apr 12 09:45 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K Apr 22 14:32 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K Apr 22 14:32 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:42 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K May 18 16:42 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-COL-05-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-COL-05-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-COL-05-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-COL-05-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-COL-05-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-COL-05-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-COL-05-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-COL-05-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-COL-05-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-COL-05-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-COL-05-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-COL-05-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-COL-05-CTLFireability-2024-12
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-COL-05-CTLFireability-2024-13
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-COL-05-CTLFireability-2024-14
FORMULA_NAME CSRepetitions-COL-05-CTLFireability-2024-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1717201124188
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=ltsminxred
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=CSRepetitions-COL-05
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Applying reductions before tool ltsmin
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-06-01 00:18:45] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -timeout, 360, -rebuildPNML]
[2024-06-01 00:18:45] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-06-01 00:18:45] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2024-06-01 00:18:45] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2024-06-01 00:18:45] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 542 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:45] [INFO ] Imported 6 HL places and 5 HL transitions for a total of 206 PT places and 325.0 transition bindings in 17 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 14 ms.
[2024-06-01 00:18:46] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 6 places and 5 transitions 15 arcs in 3 ms.
[2024-06-01 00:18:46] [INFO ] Skeletonized 16 HLPN properties in 2 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Remains 4 properties that can be checked using skeleton over-approximation.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 7 to 6
RANDOM walk for 40065 steps (688 resets) in 231 ms. (172 steps per ms) remains 1/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (252 resets) in 170 ms. (233 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 5 rows 6 cols
[2024-06-01 00:18:46] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Problem AtomicPropp0 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 2/11 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 79 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/2 constraints, State Equation: 0/6 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 120ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 4 simplifications.
[2024-06-01 00:18:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
Transition Send_Answer forces synchronizations/join behavior on parameter c of sort Client
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial and guards and successors and join/free detected :Server
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial detected :Server
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial and guards detected :Server
Applying symmetric unfolding of full symmetric sort :Server domain size was 5
[2024-06-01 00:18:46] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 102 places and 125 transitions 375 arcs in 12 ms.
[2024-06-01 00:18:46] [INFO ] Unfolded 16 HLPN properties in 1 ms.
Support contains 102 out of 102 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 125/125 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 125/125 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 125 rows 102 cols
[2024-06-01 00:18:46] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 6 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 76 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 00:18:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 00:18:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2024-06-01 00:18:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 165 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 100 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 00:18:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 00:18:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 25/102 variables, 25/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 125/227 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 25/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/227 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 227/227 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved in 2464 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 25/102 variables, 25/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 125/227 variables, 102/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 25/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 100/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/227 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 227/227 variables, and 253 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved in 2154 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4716ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4720ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4904 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 125/125 transitions.
Support contains 102 out of 102 places after structural reductions.
[2024-06-01 00:18:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 125 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 21 to 15
RANDOM walk for 40005 steps (791 resets) in 1243 ms. (32 steps per ms) remains 1/15 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (42 resets) in 793 ms. (50 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2024-06-01 00:18:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 00:18:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
Problem AtomicPropp0 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 50/227 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 28 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/26 constraints, State Equation: 0/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 41ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2024-06-01 00:18:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 125 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 25 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 125/125 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 125/125 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 125/125 transitions.
[2024-06-01 00:18:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 125 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 125/125 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 125/125 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 125/125 transitions.
[2024-06-01 00:18:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 125 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 125/125 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 125/125 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 125/125 transitions.
[2024-06-01 00:18:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 125 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 125/125 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 125/125 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 125/125 transitions.
[2024-06-01 00:18:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 125 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 125/125 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 125/125 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 125/125 transitions.
[2024-06-01 00:18:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 125 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 125/125 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 125/125 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 125/125 transitions.
[2024-06-01 00:18:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 125 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 125/125 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 125/125 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 125/125 transitions.
[2024-06-01 00:18:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 125 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 125/125 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 125/125 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 125/125 transitions.
[2024-06-01 00:18:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 125 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 125/125 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 125/125 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 125/125 transitions.
[2024-06-01 00:18:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 125 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 125/125 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 125/125 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 125/125 transitions.
[2024-06-01 00:18:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 125 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 125/125 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 125/125 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 125/125 transitions.
[2024-06-01 00:18:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 125 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 125/125 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 125/125 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 125/125 transitions.
[2024-06-01 00:18:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 125 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 125/125 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 125/125 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 125/125 transitions.
[2024-06-01 00:18:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 125 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 125/125 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 125/125 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 125/125 transitions.
[2024-06-01 00:18:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 125 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 125/125 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 125/125 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 125/125 transitions.
[2024-06-01 00:18:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 125 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 125/125 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 125/125 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 125/125 transitions.
[2024-06-01 00:18:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 125 transitions.
[2024-06-01 00:18:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-06-01 00:18:53] [INFO ] Export to MCC of 16 properties in file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.sr.xml took 18 ms.
[2024-06-01 00:18:53] [INFO ] Export to PNML in file /home/mcc/execution/model.sr.pnml of net with 102 places, 125 transitions and 375 arcs took 4 ms.
Total runtime 8203 ms.
There are residual formulas that ITS could not solve within timeout
Usage: pnml2lts-sym [-gvqh] [--order=
[--mu-opt] [--saturation=
[--sat-granularity=
[--guidance=
[--action=
[--trace=
[--mu=
[--ctl=
[--save-levels=STRING] [--pg-solve] [--attr=
[--saturating-attractor] [--write-strategy=
[--check-strategy] [--interactive-play] [--player]
[--pg-write=
[--edge-label=
[--mucalc=
[--allow-undefined-edges] [--allow-undefined-values]
[-p|--por=
[--weak=[valmari] (default: uses stronger left-commutativity)]
[--leap] [-r|--regroup=<(T,)+>] [--sloan-w1=
[--cw-max-cols=
[--mh-timeout=
[--graph-metrics] [--regroup-exit] [--regroup-time]
[-g|--pins-guards] [--vset=
[--ldd32-cache=
[--cache-ratio=
[--min-free-nodes=
[--fdd-reorder=
[--vset-cache-diff=
[--next-union] [--peak-nodes] [--maxsum=
[--block-size=
[--debug=
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="CSRepetitions-COL-05"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="ltsminxred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool ltsminxred"
echo " Input is CSRepetitions-COL-05, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r476-tall-171620505400202"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/CSRepetitions-COL-05.tgz
mv CSRepetitions-COL-05 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;