fond
Model Checking Contest 2024
14th edition, Geneva, Switzerland, June 25, 2024
Execution of r472-tajo-171620399800571
Last Updated
July 7, 2024

About the Execution of LTSMin+red for BusinessProcesses-PT-16

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
556.712 85888.00 133326.00 88.00 FTTFTFFFFFTTFTFT normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r472-tajo-171620399800571.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file='/mnt/tpsp/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2' backing_fmt='qcow2' encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool ltsminxred
Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-16, examination is LTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r472-tajo-171620399800571
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 700K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.6K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 95K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.3K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 48K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.3K May 19 07:06 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K May 19 15:30 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K Apr 22 14:31 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K Apr 22 14:31 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Apr 11 16:32 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 171K Apr 11 16:32 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 10K Apr 11 16:31 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 90K Apr 11 16:31 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Apr 22 14:31 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 22 14:31 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 159K May 18 16:42 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-00
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-01
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-02
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-03
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-04
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-05
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-06
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-07
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-08
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-09
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1717225973317

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=ltsminxred
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=BusinessProcesses-PT-16
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Applying reductions before tool ltsmin
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-06-01 07:12:54] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLCardinality, -timeout, 360, -rebuildPNML]
[2024-06-01 07:12:54] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-06-01 07:12:55] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 93 ms
[2024-06-01 07:12:55] [INFO ] Transformed 638 places.
[2024-06-01 07:12:55] [INFO ] Transformed 578 transitions.
[2024-06-01 07:12:55] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-06-01 07:12:55] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 638 places and 578 transitions and 1694 arcs in 212 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLCardinality.xml in 12 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 9 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 8 transitions.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 29 out of 630 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 630/630 places, 570/570 transitions.
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 625 transition count 570
Discarding 93 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 93 rule applications. Total rules 98 place count 532 transition count 477
Iterating global reduction 1 with 93 rules applied. Total rules applied 191 place count 532 transition count 477
Discarding 46 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 46 rule applications. Total rules 237 place count 486 transition count 431
Iterating global reduction 1 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 283 place count 486 transition count 431
Applied a total of 283 rules in 173 ms. Remains 486 /630 variables (removed 144) and now considering 431/570 (removed 139) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 431 rows 486 cols
[2024-06-01 07:12:55] [INFO ] Computed 95 invariants in 49 ms
[2024-06-01 07:12:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 451 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 07:12:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 07:12:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 526 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1011 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 430 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-06-01 07:12:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/485 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 430 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/485 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 430 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/486 variables, 56/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 430 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/486 variables, 2/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 430 unsolved
[2024-06-01 07:13:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 160 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 131 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 97 places in 139 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 121 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 120 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 108 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 105 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 103 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 107 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 106 places in 101 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 98 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 103 places in 100 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 99 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 101 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 106 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 89 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 121 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 107 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 97 places in 97 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 101 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/486 variables, 20/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 430 unsolved
[2024-06-01 07:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 150 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 140 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 102 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 103 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 111 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 97 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 105 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 106 places in 112 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 123 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 97 places in 110 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 104 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 97 places in 102 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 130 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 97 places in 141 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 115 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 116 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 120 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 120 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 130 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 131 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/486 variables, 20/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 430 unsolved
[2024-06-01 07:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 114 places in 117 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 124 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 111 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 113 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 104 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 104 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 105 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 102 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 102 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 104 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 101 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 132 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 112 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 128 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 115 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 124 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 116 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 143 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 132 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 114 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD326 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD328 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD337 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD338 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD350 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD352 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD355 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD356 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/486 variables, 20/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 422 unsolved
[2024-06-01 07:13:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 103 places in 147 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 125 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 115 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 111 places in 140 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 133 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 127 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 138 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 120 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 121 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 106 places in 115 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 126 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 115 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 110 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 99 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 105 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 131 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 117 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 125 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 116 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/486 variables, 20/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 422 unsolved
[2024-06-01 07:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 109 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 97 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 107 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 113 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 104 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 120 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 107 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 107 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 108 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 109 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 131 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 113 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 103 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 118 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 109 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 117 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 113 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 105 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 97 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 92 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD340 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD342 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD344 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD346 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD347 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD358 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD361 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/486 variables, 20/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 415 unsolved
[2024-06-01 07:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 103 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 114 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 128 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 118 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 117 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 116 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 114 places in 108 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 121 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 199 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 104 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 154 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 124 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 98 places in 140 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 145 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 103 places in 134 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 211 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 125 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 121 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 114 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 117 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD331 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD332 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD359 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD362 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD363 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD365 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD376 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD377 is UNSAT
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 1.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 1.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 1.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 1.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 1.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 1.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 1.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 1.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 1.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 1.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 1.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 1.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 1.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 0.0)
(s103 0.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 1.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 1.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 0.0)
(s120 1.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 0.0)
(s123 0.0)
(s124 0.0)
(s125 0.0)
(s126 1.0)
(s127 0.0)
(s128 0.0)
(s129 0.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 1.0)
(s133 0.0)
(s134 0.0)
(s135 0.0)
(s136 0.0)
(s137 0.0)
(s138 1.0)
(s139 0.0)
(s140 0.0)
(s141 0.0)
(s142 0.0)
(s143 0.0)
(s144 0.0)
(s145 0.0)
(s146 0.0)
(s147 0.0)
(s148 0.0)
(s149 0.0)
(s150 0.0)
(s151 0.0)
(s152 0.0)
(s153 1.0)
(s154 0.0)
(s155 0.0)
(s156 0.0)
(s157 0.0)
(s158 0.0)
(s159 0.0)
(s160 0.0)
(s161 0.0)
(s162 0.0)
(s163 0.0)
(s164 0.0)
(s165 0.0)timeout

(s166 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/486 variables, 20/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 23 solved, 407 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 486/917 variables, and 215 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 23 solved, 407 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 39/39 constraints, State Equation: 0/486 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 430/430 constraints, Known Traps: 120/120 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 23 solved, 407 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/485 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 23 solved, 407 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/485 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 23 solved, 407 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/486 variables, 56/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 23 solved, 407 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/486 variables, 2/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 23 solved, 407 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/486 variables, 120/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 23 solved, 407 unsolved
[2024-06-01 07:13:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 116 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 120 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 130 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 107 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 148 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 148 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 132 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 125 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 120 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 128 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 146 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 127 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 152 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 117 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 103 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 100 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 100 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 140 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 106 places in 102 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 138 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/486 variables, 20/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 23 solved, 407 unsolved
[2024-06-01 07:13:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 103 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 106 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 98 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 101 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 97 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 97 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 97 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 95 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 102 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 117 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 111 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 108 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 113 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 152 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 110 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 132 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 114 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 108 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 142 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD349 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD353 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD367 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD371 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/486 variables, 20/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 27 solved, 403 unsolved
[2024-06-01 07:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 152 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 120 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 151 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 40 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 110 places in 142 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 136 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 129 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 102 places in 112 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 145 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 121 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 123 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 170 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 125 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 156 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 123 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 122 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 125 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 125 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 126 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 139 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD368 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/486 variables, 20/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 28 solved, 402 unsolved
[2024-06-01 07:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 145 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 139 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 122 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 97 places in 118 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 120 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 125 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 140 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 123 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 118 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 122 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 113 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 115 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 123 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 127 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 148 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 119 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 123 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 126 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 118 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 121 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/486 variables, 20/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 28 solved, 402 unsolved
[2024-06-01 07:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 66 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 157 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 119 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 108 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 139 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 116 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 117 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 116 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 112 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 117 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 120 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 120 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 117 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 137 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 114 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 111 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 110 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 103 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 132 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 137 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/486 variables, 20/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 28 solved, 402 unsolved
[2024-06-01 07:13:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 180 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 127 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 124 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 151 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 103 places in 130 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 127 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 127 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 152 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 106 places in 114 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 203 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 103 places in 138 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 121 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 151 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 121 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 122 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 117 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 120 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 137 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 139 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 138 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD372 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD373 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/486 variables, 20/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 400 unsolved
[2024-06-01 07:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 140 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 139 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 153 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 145 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 136 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 134 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 128 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 129 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 130 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 137 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 126 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 159 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 128 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 128 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 129 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 168 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 132 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 130 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 120 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 107 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/486 variables, 20/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 400 unsolved
[2024-06-01 07:13:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 148 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 157 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 98 places in 133 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 130 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 138 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 127 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 96 places in 123 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 95 places in 123 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 152 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 98 places in 145 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 139 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60324ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 30 solved, 400 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 30 dead transitions in 60345ms
Found 30 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 30 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 30 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 486/630 places, 401/570 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 13 ms. Remains 486 /486 variables (removed 0) and now considering 401/401 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 61569 ms. Remains : 486/630 places, 401/570 transitions.
Support contains 29 out of 486 places after structural reductions.
[2024-06-01 07:13:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 74 ms
[2024-06-01 07:13:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2024-06-01 07:13:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 401 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (266 resets) in 1829 ms. (21 steps per ms) remains 12/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (49 resets) in 230 ms. (173 steps per ms) remains 10/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (45 resets) in 105 ms. (377 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (45 resets) in 162 ms. (245 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (46 resets) in 208 ms. (191 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (47 resets) in 146 ms. (272 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (42 resets) in 143 ms. (277 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (43 resets) in 208 ms. (191 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (44 resets) in 92 ms. (430 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (50 resets) in 117 ms. (338 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (47 resets) in 102 ms. (388 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 401 rows 486 cols
[2024-06-01 07:13:58] [INFO ] Computed 99 invariants in 7 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 214/232 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 130/362 variables, 35/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/362 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 113/475 variables, 42/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 2/477 variables, 1/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/477 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 395/872 variables, 477/576 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/872 variables, 0/576 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 13/885 variables, 7/583 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/885 variables, 0/583 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 2/887 variables, 2/585 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/887 variables, 0/585 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/887 variables, 0/585 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 887/887 variables, and 585 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved in 895 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 43/43 constraints, State Equation: 486/486 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 214/232 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
[2024-06-01 07:13:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 82 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 2/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 130/362 variables, 35/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
[2024-06-01 07:13:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:13:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 76 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/362 variables, 6/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/362 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 113/475 variables, 42/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
[2024-06-01 07:14:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 115 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 114 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 103 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 75 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 129 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 132 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 105 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 136 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 115 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 118 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 107 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 125 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 121 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 93 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 73 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 203 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 129 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
[2024-06-01 07:14:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 168 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 132 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 115 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 118 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 121 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 118 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 105 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 104 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 104 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 112 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 10/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 0/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 2/477 variables, 1/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/477 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 5924ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 18 out of 486 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 486/486 places, 401/401 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1046 edges and 486 vertex of which 485 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 45 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 45 transitions
Performed 45 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 45
Iterating post reduction 0 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 485 transition count 355
Reduce places removed 45 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 440 transition count 352
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 437 transition count 352
Performed 93 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 93 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 437 transition count 259
Deduced a syphon composed of 93 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 16 places
Reduce places removed 109 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 202 rules applied. Total rules applied 299 place count 328 transition count 259
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 302 place count 325 transition count 256
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 305 place count 325 transition count 256
Performed 128 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 128
Deduced a syphon composed of 128 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 6 places
Reduce places removed 134 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 262 rules applied. Total rules applied 567 place count 191 transition count 128
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 568 place count 191 transition count 127
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -4
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 570 place count 190 transition count 131
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 6 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 6 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 576 place count 190 transition count 131
Applied a total of 576 rules in 107 ms. Remains 190 /486 variables (removed 296) and now considering 131/401 (removed 270) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 107 ms. Remains : 190/486 places, 131/401 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (3294 resets) in 808 ms. (49 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (972 resets) in 367 ms. (108 steps per ms) remains 9/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (922 resets) in 199 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (923 resets) in 267 ms. (149 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (922 resets) in 188 ms. (211 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (1036 resets) in 121 ms. (327 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (835 resets) in 137 ms. (289 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (925 resets) in 137 ms. (289 steps per ms) remains 8/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (1047 resets) in 160 ms. (248 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (941 resets) in 179 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 131 rows 190 cols
[2024-06-01 07:14:05] [INFO ] Computed 77 invariants in 8 ms
[2024-06-01 07:14:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 6 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 82/96 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 52/148 variables, 35/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 39/187 variables, 22/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 131/318 variables, 187/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 6/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 0/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 3/321 variables, 3/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 0/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/321 variables, 0/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 321/321 variables, and 273 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved in 274 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 22/22 constraints, State Equation: 190/190 constraints, ReadFeed: 6/6 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 82/96 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
[2024-06-01 07:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 2/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 52/148 variables, 35/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 39/187 variables, 22/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
[2024-06-01 07:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 89 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 1/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 131/318 variables, 187/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 6/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 7/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
[2024-06-01 07:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 71 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 71 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 60 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 8/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
[2024-06-01 07:14:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 75 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 63 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 3/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
[2024-06-01 07:14:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 60 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 2/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
[2024-06-01 07:14:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 72 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 2/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 0/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 3/321 variables, 3/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 1/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
[2024-06-01 07:14:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 64 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 75 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-06-01 07:14:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 73 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 3/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/321 variables, 0/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/321 variables, 0/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 321/321 variables, and 302 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved in 2636 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 22/22 constraints, State Equation: 190/190 constraints, ReadFeed: 6/6 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints]
After SMT, in 2924ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Fused 8 Parikh solutions to 7 different solutions.
Finished Parikh walk after 56 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=56 )
Parikh walk visited 8 properties in 501 ms.
Computed a total of 127 stabilizing places and 120 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 1046 edges and 486 vertex of which 485 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.38 ms
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 486 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 486/486 places, 401/401 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 230 edges and 486 vertex of which 6 / 486 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 3 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1040 edges and 481 vertex of which 480 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 54 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 54 transitions
Performed 54 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 54
Iterating post reduction 0 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 479 transition count 339
Reduce places removed 54 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 425 transition count 339
Performed 100 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 100 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 425 transition count 239
Deduced a syphon composed of 100 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 17 places
Reduce places removed 117 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 217 rules applied. Total rules applied 327 place count 308 transition count 239
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 336 place count 299 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 345 place count 299 transition count 230
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 345 place count 299 transition count 229
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 347 place count 298 transition count 229
Performed 124 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 124
Deduced a syphon composed of 124 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 9 places
Reduce places removed 133 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 257 rules applied. Total rules applied 604 place count 165 transition count 105
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -4
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 606 place count 164 transition count 109
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 607 place count 163 transition count 108
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 608 place count 162 transition count 108
Applied a total of 608 rules in 138 ms. Remains 162 /486 variables (removed 324) and now considering 108/401 (removed 293) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 108 rows 162 cols
[2024-06-01 07:14:09] [INFO ] Computed 72 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-06-01 07:14:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 258 ms returned [20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 44, 45, 46, 47]
Discarding 10 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 264 ms to find 10 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 152/486 places, 108/401 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 152 /152 variables (removed 0) and now considering 108/108 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 412 ms. Remains : 152/486 places, 108/401 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 168 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-00
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 18 steps with 4 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-00 finished in 664 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G((X(F(p1))||p0))))'
Support contains 4 out of 486 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 486/486 places, 401/401 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 226 edges and 486 vertex of which 6 / 486 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1040 edges and 481 vertex of which 480 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 52 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 52 transitions
Performed 52 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 52
Iterating post reduction 0 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 479 transition count 341
Reduce places removed 52 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 427 transition count 341
Performed 99 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 99 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 427 transition count 242
Deduced a syphon composed of 99 places in 2 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 16 places
Reduce places removed 115 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 214 rules applied. Total rules applied 320 place count 312 transition count 242
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 328 place count 304 transition count 234
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 336 place count 304 transition count 234
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 336 place count 304 transition count 233
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 338 place count 303 transition count 233
Performed 124 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 124
Deduced a syphon composed of 124 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 9 places
Reduce places removed 133 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 257 rules applied. Total rules applied 595 place count 170 transition count 109
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -4
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 597 place count 169 transition count 113
Applied a total of 597 rules in 68 ms. Remains 169 /486 variables (removed 317) and now considering 113/401 (removed 288) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 113 rows 169 cols
[2024-06-01 07:14:10] [INFO ] Computed 74 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-01 07:14:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 228 ms returned [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 14, 15, 19, 20, 24, 25, 26, 27, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 134]
Discarding 21 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 232 ms to find 21 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 148/486 places, 113/401 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 148 /148 variables (removed 0) and now considering 113/113 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 306 ms. Remains : 148/486 places, 113/401 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 134 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-01
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 15061 reset in 313 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 15171 reset in 298 ms.
Computed a total of 14 stabilizing places and 12 stable transitions
Computed a total of 14 stabilizing places and 12 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 138 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 64 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (6625 resets) in 524 ms. (76 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (2501 resets) in 177 ms. (224 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (2356 resets) in 226 ms. (176 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (2494 resets) in 63 ms. (625 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (2347 resets) in 67 ms. (588 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
Probably explored full state space saw : 15771 states, properties seen :3
Probabilistic random walk after 56032 steps, saw 15771 distinct states, run finished after 146 ms. (steps per millisecond=383 ) properties seen :3
Explored full state space saw : 15771 states, properties seen :0
Exhaustive walk after 56032 steps, saw 15771 distinct states, run finished after 98 ms. (steps per millisecond=571 ) properties seen :0
Found 1 invariant AP formulas.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1)), (G (OR p0 p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1)))]
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 10 factoid took 12 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-01 finished in 1974 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 3 out of 486 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 486/486 places, 401/401 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 230 edges and 486 vertex of which 6 / 486 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1040 edges and 481 vertex of which 480 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 53 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 53 transitions
Performed 53 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 53
Iterating post reduction 0 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 479 transition count 340
Reduce places removed 53 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 426 transition count 339
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 425 transition count 339
Performed 99 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 99 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 425 transition count 240
Deduced a syphon composed of 99 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 16 places
Reduce places removed 115 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 214 rules applied. Total rules applied 324 place count 310 transition count 240
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 334 place count 300 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 344 place count 300 transition count 230
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 344 place count 300 transition count 229
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 346 place count 299 transition count 229
Performed 124 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 124
Deduced a syphon composed of 124 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 9 places
Reduce places removed 133 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 257 rules applied. Total rules applied 603 place count 166 transition count 105
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -4
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 605 place count 165 transition count 109
Applied a total of 605 rules in 45 ms. Remains 165 /486 variables (removed 321) and now considering 109/401 (removed 292) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 109 rows 165 cols
[2024-06-01 07:14:11] [INFO ] Computed 74 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-01 07:14:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 168 ms returned [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 134]
Discarding 21 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 170 ms to find 21 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 144/486 places, 109/401 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 144 /144 variables (removed 0) and now considering 109/109 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 223 ms. Remains : 144/486 places, 109/401 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 36 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-03
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 30 steps with 4 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-03 finished in 271 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(G(p0))))'
Support contains 1 out of 486 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 486/486 places, 401/401 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 475 transition count 390
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 475 transition count 390
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 471 transition count 386
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 471 transition count 386
Applied a total of 30 rules in 29 ms. Remains 471 /486 variables (removed 15) and now considering 386/401 (removed 15) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 386 rows 471 cols
[2024-06-01 07:14:12] [INFO ] Computed 99 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-06-01 07:14:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 326 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 07:14:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 07:14:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 512 ms returned [149, 151]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 863 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 469/486 places, 386/401 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 469 /469 variables (removed 0) and now considering 386/386 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 901 ms. Remains : 469/486 places, 386/401 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 129 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-05
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 97 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-05 finished in 1045 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 486 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 486/486 places, 401/401 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 229 edges and 486 vertex of which 6 / 486 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1040 edges and 481 vertex of which 480 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 53 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 53 transitions
Performed 53 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 53
Iterating post reduction 0 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 479 transition count 340
Reduce places removed 53 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 426 transition count 339
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 425 transition count 339
Performed 99 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 99 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 425 transition count 240
Deduced a syphon composed of 99 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 17 places
Reduce places removed 116 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 215 rules applied. Total rules applied 325 place count 309 transition count 240
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 334 place count 300 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 343 place count 300 transition count 231
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 343 place count 300 transition count 230
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 345 place count 299 transition count 230
Performed 126 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 126
Deduced a syphon composed of 126 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 9 places
Reduce places removed 135 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 261 rules applied. Total rules applied 606 place count 164 transition count 104
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -4
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 608 place count 163 transition count 108
Applied a total of 608 rules in 39 ms. Remains 163 /486 variables (removed 323) and now considering 108/401 (removed 293) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 108 rows 163 cols
[2024-06-01 07:14:13] [INFO ] Computed 73 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-01 07:14:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 132 ms returned [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 43, 44, 47, 48]
Discarding 19 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 133 ms to find 19 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 144/486 places, 108/401 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 144 /144 variables (removed 0) and now considering 108/108 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 177 ms. Remains : 144/486 places, 108/401 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 37 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-06
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 177 steps with 44 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-06 finished in 231 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 486 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 486/486 places, 401/401 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 476 transition count 391
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 476 transition count 391
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 472 transition count 387
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 472 transition count 387
Applied a total of 28 rules in 30 ms. Remains 472 /486 variables (removed 14) and now considering 387/401 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 387 rows 472 cols
[2024-06-01 07:14:13] [INFO ] Computed 99 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-06-01 07:14:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 191 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 07:14:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 07:14:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 451 ms returned [149, 151]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 645 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 470/486 places, 387/401 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 470 /470 variables (removed 0) and now considering 387/387 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 682 ms. Remains : 470/486 places, 387/401 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 79 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-07
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-07 finished in 775 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(G(p0))))'
Support contains 1 out of 486 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 486/486 places, 401/401 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 475 transition count 390
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 475 transition count 390
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 471 transition count 386
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 471 transition count 386
Applied a total of 30 rules in 29 ms. Remains 471 /486 variables (removed 15) and now considering 386/401 (removed 15) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 386 rows 471 cols
[2024-06-01 07:14:14] [INFO ] Computed 99 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-06-01 07:14:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 162 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 07:14:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 07:14:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 497 ms returned [149, 151]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 687 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 469/486 places, 386/401 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 469 /469 variables (removed 0) and now considering 386/386 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 723 ms. Remains : 469/486 places, 386/401 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 113 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-08
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-08 finished in 851 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(p0))'
Support contains 1 out of 486 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 486/486 places, 401/401 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 229 edges and 486 vertex of which 6 / 486 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1040 edges and 481 vertex of which 480 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 53 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 53 transitions
Performed 53 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 53
Iterating post reduction 0 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 479 transition count 340
Reduce places removed 53 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 426 transition count 340
Performed 100 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 100 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 426 transition count 240
Deduced a syphon composed of 100 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 17 places
Reduce places removed 117 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 217 rules applied. Total rules applied 325 place count 309 transition count 240
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 334 place count 300 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 343 place count 300 transition count 231
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 343 place count 300 transition count 230
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 345 place count 299 transition count 230
Performed 126 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 126
Deduced a syphon composed of 126 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 9 places
Reduce places removed 135 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 261 rules applied. Total rules applied 606 place count 164 transition count 104
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -4
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 608 place count 163 transition count 108
Applied a total of 608 rules in 32 ms. Remains 163 /486 variables (removed 323) and now considering 108/401 (removed 293) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 108 rows 163 cols
[2024-06-01 07:14:15] [INFO ] Computed 73 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-06-01 07:14:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 112 ms returned [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47]
Discarding 20 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 113 ms to find 20 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 143/486 places, 108/401 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 143 /143 variables (removed 0) and now considering 108/108 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 148 ms. Remains : 143/486 places, 108/401 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 33 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-09
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 0 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-09 finished in 191 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 486 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 486/486 places, 401/401 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 477 transition count 392
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 477 transition count 392
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 475 transition count 390
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 475 transition count 390
Applied a total of 22 rules in 18 ms. Remains 475 /486 variables (removed 11) and now considering 390/401 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 390 rows 475 cols
[2024-06-01 07:14:15] [INFO ] Computed 99 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-06-01 07:14:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 133 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 07:14:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 07:14:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 347 ms returned [151, 153]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 507 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 473/486 places, 390/401 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 473 /473 variables (removed 0) and now considering 390/390 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 532 ms. Remains : 473/486 places, 390/401 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 55 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-10
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 222 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 234 ms.
Computed a total of 125 stabilizing places and 118 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 1019 edges and 473 vertex of which 472 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.4 ms
Computed a total of 125 stabilizing places and 118 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 22 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-10 finished in 1086 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F((G(p1)&&p0))||X(p2))))'
Support contains 7 out of 486 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 486/486 places, 401/401 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 477 transition count 392
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 477 transition count 392
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 473 transition count 388
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 473 transition count 388
Applied a total of 26 rules in 29 ms. Remains 473 /486 variables (removed 13) and now considering 388/401 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 388 rows 473 cols
[2024-06-01 07:14:16] [INFO ] Computed 99 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-06-01 07:14:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 226 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 07:14:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 07:14:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 470 ms returned [150, 152]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 726 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 471/486 places, 388/401 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 471 /471 variables (removed 0) and now considering 388/388 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 763 ms. Remains : 471/486 places, 388/401 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 214 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-12
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 146 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-12 finished in 1008 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 486 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 486/486 places, 401/401 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 230 edges and 486 vertex of which 6 / 486 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 1040 edges and 481 vertex of which 480 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 54 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 54 transitions
Performed 54 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 54
Iterating post reduction 0 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 479 transition count 339
Reduce places removed 54 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 425 transition count 339
Performed 99 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 99 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 425 transition count 240
Deduced a syphon composed of 99 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 17 places
Reduce places removed 116 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 215 rules applied. Total rules applied 325 place count 309 transition count 240
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 334 place count 300 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 343 place count 300 transition count 231
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 343 place count 300 transition count 230
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 345 place count 299 transition count 230
Performed 127 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 127
Deduced a syphon composed of 127 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 9 places
Reduce places removed 136 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 263 rules applied. Total rules applied 608 place count 163 transition count 103
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -4
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 610 place count 162 transition count 107
Applied a total of 610 rules in 42 ms. Remains 162 /486 variables (removed 324) and now considering 107/401 (removed 294) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 162 cols
[2024-06-01 07:14:17] [INFO ] Computed 73 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-06-01 07:14:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 126 ms returned [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48]
Discarding 20 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 129 ms to find 20 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 142/486 places, 107/401 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 142 /142 variables (removed 0) and now considering 107/107 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 175 ms. Remains : 142/486 places, 107/401 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 44 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-14
Stuttering criterion allowed to conclude after 99878 steps with 21760 reset in 215 ms.
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-14 finished in 445 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((X(G(p1))||p0)))'
Support contains 4 out of 486 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 486/486 places, 401/401 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 475 transition count 390
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 475 transition count 390
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 471 transition count 386
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 471 transition count 386
Applied a total of 30 rules in 35 ms. Remains 471 /486 variables (removed 15) and now considering 386/401 (removed 15) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 386 rows 471 cols
[2024-06-01 07:14:17] [INFO ] Computed 99 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-06-01 07:14:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 199 ms returned []
[2024-06-01 07:14:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-06-01 07:14:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 522 ms returned [149, 151]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 751 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 469/486 places, 386/401 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 469 /469 variables (removed 0) and now considering 386/386 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 794 ms. Remains : 469/486 places, 386/401 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 104 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-15
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 188 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 214 ms.
Computed a total of 125 stabilizing places and 118 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 1011 edges and 469 vertex of which 468 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.4 ms
Computed a total of 125 stabilizing places and 118 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X p0), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 15 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property BusinessProcesses-PT-16-LTLCardinality-15 finished in 1350 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 84272 ms.
ITS solved all properties within timeout

BK_STOP 1717226059205

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLCardinality -timeout 360 -rebuildPNML

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="BusinessProcesses-PT-16"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="ltsminxred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool ltsminxred"
echo " Input is BusinessProcesses-PT-16, examination is LTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r472-tajo-171620399800571"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/BusinessProcesses-PT-16.tgz
mv BusinessProcesses-PT-16 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;