fond
Model Checking Contest 2024
14th edition, Geneva, Switzerland, June 25, 2024
Execution of r470-smll-171620175500093
Last Updated
July 7, 2024

About the Execution of LTSMin+red for AutoFlight-PT-06b

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
339.323 14322.00 32856.00 99.90 F normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r470-smll-171620175500093.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool ltsminxred
Input is AutoFlight-PT-06b, examination is StableMarking
Time confinement is 1800 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r470-smll-171620175500093
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 532K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.4K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.1K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 59K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.4K May 19 07:06 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 19 15:26 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.0K May 19 07:12 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 19 17:50 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Apr 12 22:07 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 112K Apr 12 22:07 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.9K Apr 12 22:07 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 45K Apr 12 22:07 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 22 14:28 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 22 14:28 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 134K May 18 16:42 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

FORMULA_NAME StableMarking

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1717191558088

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=ltsminxred
BK_EXAMINATION=StableMarking
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=1800
BK_INPUT=AutoFlight-PT-06b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Applying reductions before tool ltsmin
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-31 21:39:19] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, StableMarking, -timeout, 180, -rebuildPNML]
[2024-05-31 21:39:19] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-31 21:39:20] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 165 ms
[2024-05-31 21:39:20] [INFO ] Transformed 574 places.
[2024-05-31 21:39:20] [INFO ] Transformed 572 transitions.
[2024-05-31 21:39:20] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-31 21:39:20] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 574 places and 572 transitions and 1334 arcs in 367 ms.
Structural test allowed to assert that 341 places are NOT stable. Took 16 ms.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (138 resets) in 4252 ms. (9 steps per ms) remains 115/233 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (22 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (26 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (33 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (26 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 402 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (23 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (23 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (23 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (26 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (31 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (26 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (36 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (31 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 7 ms. (50 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (36 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (36 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (40 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 7 ms. (50 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 7 ms. (50 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (44 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (33 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 402 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (36 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 6 ms. (57 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (40 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (36 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (40 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (31 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 7 ms. (50 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 6 ms. (57 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (36 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (25 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (36 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (40 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 402 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (44 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (40 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 5 ms. (67 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 7 ms. (50 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 401 steps (8 resets) in 7 ms. (50 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 6 ms. (57 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 7 ms. (50 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 5 ms. (67 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 402 steps (8 resets) in 6 ms. (57 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 402 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (40 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 6 ms. (57 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (40 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 402 steps (8 resets) in 7 ms. (50 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 6 ms. (57 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 6 ms. (57 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 404 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (44 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 403 steps (8 resets) in 5 ms. (67 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 402 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (40 steps per ms) remains 115/115 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 572 rows 574 cols
[2024-05-31 21:39:21] [INFO ] Computed 40 invariants in 36 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 115/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 261/376 variables, 16/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 261/392 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 1/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 0/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 198/574 variables, 23/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/574 variables, 198/614 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 (/ 1.0 108.0))
(s34 0.0)
(s35 (/ 1.0 108.0))
(s36 (/ 26.0 27.0))
(s37 0.0)
(s38 (/ 1.0 108.0))
(s39 (/ 1.0 108.0))
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 1.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 (/ 1.0 108.0))
(s56 (/ 1.0 108.0))
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 (/ 1.0 108.0))
(s60 (/ 1.0 108.0))
(s61 (/ 101.0 108.0))
(s62 (/ 1.0 108.0))
(s63 0.0)
(s64 (/ 1.0 108.0))
(s65 (/ 1.0 108.0))
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 1.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 1.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 (/ 1.0 108.0))
(s95 (/ 1.0 108.0))
(s96 0.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 (/ 1.0 108.0))
(s99 (/ 1.0 108.0))
(s100 (/ 1.0 108.0))
(s101 (/ 1.0 108.0))
(s102 0.0)
(s103 (/ 1.0 108.0))
(s104 (/ 101.0 108.0))
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 (/ 1.0 108.0))
(s112 0.0)
(s113 (/ 1.0 108.0))
(s114 0.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 (/ 35.0 36.0))
(s117 (/ 1.0 108.0))
(s118 0.0)
(s119 0.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 0.0)
(s123 1.0)
(s124 0.0)
(s125 0.0)
(s126 0.0)
(s127 0.0)
(s128 0.0)
(s129 0.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 0.0)
(s133 (/ 101.0 108.0))
(s134 (/ 1.0 108.0))
(s135 0.0)
(s136 0.0)
(s137 (/ 1.0 108.0))
(s138 (/ 1.0 108.0))
(s139 (/ 1.0 108.0))
(s140 (/ 1.0 108.0))
(s141 0.0)
(s142 (/ 1.0 108.0))
(s143 (/ 1.0 108.0))
(s144 0.0)
(s145 0.0)
(s146 0.0)
(s147 0.0)
(s148 0.0)
(s149 0.0)
(s150 0.0)
(s151 0.0)
(s152 1.0)
(s153 0.0)
(s154 0.0)
(s155 0.0)
(s156 0.0)
(s157 0.0)
(s158 0.0)
(s159 0.0)
(s160 0.0)
(s161 0.0)
(s162 0.0)
(s163 0.0)
(s164 0.0)
(s165 1.0)
(s166 0.0)
(s167 0.0)
(s168 0.0)
(s169 0.0)
(s170 0.0)
(s171 0.0)
(s172 (/ 1.0 108.0))
(s173 (/ 1.0 108.0))
(s174 0.0)
(s175 0.0)
(s176 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 574/1146 variables, and 614 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved in 5093 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 574/574 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 39/39 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/574 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 115/115 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 115/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 261/376 variables, 16/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 261/392 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 1/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
[2024-05-31 21:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 295 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 21:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 220 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 21:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 186 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 21:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 173 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 21:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 119 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 21:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 129 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 21:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 110 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 21:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 107 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 21:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 97 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 21:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 111 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 21:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 119 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 21:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 94 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 21:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 94 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 21:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 112 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 21:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 90 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 21:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 89 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 21:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 128 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 21:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 102 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 21:39:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 130 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 21:39:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 143 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/376 variables, 20/413 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
[2024-05-31 21:39:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 84 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 21:39:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 101 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 21:39:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 75 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 21:39:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 72 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 21:39:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 114 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 21:39:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 110 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 10352ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 115 out of 574 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 574/574 places, 572/572 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 188 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 188 transitions
Performed 188 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 188
Iterating post reduction 0 with 188 rules applied. Total rules applied 188 place count 574 transition count 384
Reduce places removed 188 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 28 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 28 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 1 with 228 rules applied. Total rules applied 416 place count 386 transition count 344
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 428 place count 374 transition count 344
Performed 57 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 57 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 428 place count 374 transition count 287
Deduced a syphon composed of 57 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 57 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 114 rules applied. Total rules applied 542 place count 317 transition count 287
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 564 place count 295 transition count 265
Iterating global reduction 3 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 586 place count 295 transition count 265
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 586 place count 295 transition count 253
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 610 place count 283 transition count 253
Performed 60 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 60
Deduced a syphon composed of 60 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 60 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 120 rules applied. Total rules applied 730 place count 223 transition count 193
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 732 place count 223 transition count 191
Free-agglomeration rule applied 24 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 756 place count 223 transition count 167
Reduce places removed 24 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 780 place count 199 transition count 167
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 781 place count 198 transition count 166
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 4 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 798 place count 186 transition count 161
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 803 place count 181 transition count 161
Performed 13 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 13 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 803 place count 181 transition count 148
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 829 place count 168 transition count 148
Applied a total of 829 rules in 165 ms. Remains 168 /574 variables (removed 406) and now considering 148/572 (removed 424) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 184 ms. Remains : 168/574 places, 148/572 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 1175 steps (0 resets) in 60 ms. (19 steps per ms) remains 0/115 properties
Able to resolve query StableMarking after proving 234 properties.
FORMULA StableMarking FALSE TECHNIQUES RANDOM_WALK MARKED_SUFFIX_TEST TOPOLOGICAL
Total runtime 12606 ms.
ITS solved all properties within timeout

BK_STOP 1717191572410

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination StableMarking -timeout 180 -rebuildPNML

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutoFlight-PT-06b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="StableMarking"
export BK_TOOL="ltsminxred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="1800"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool ltsminxred"
echo " Input is AutoFlight-PT-06b, examination is StableMarking"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r470-smll-171620175500093"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutoFlight-PT-06b.tgz
mv AutoFlight-PT-06b execution
cd execution
if [ "StableMarking" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "Liveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "StableMarking" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "StableMarking" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "StableMarking.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property StableMarking.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "StableMarking.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' StableMarking.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "StableMarking" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "Liveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME StableMarking"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;