About the Execution of LTSMin+red for AutoFlight-PT-01b
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
376.615 | 31395.00 | 59285.00 | 168.50 | ??????T?F??F?T?? | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r468-smll-171620166900066.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool ltsminxred
Input is AutoFlight-PT-01b, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r468-smll-171620166900066
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 504K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.4K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 81K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.4K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 49K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 18 16:42 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K Apr 22 14:27 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K Apr 22 14:27 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K Apr 22 14:28 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 22 14:28 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 10K Apr 12 22:11 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 108K Apr 12 22:11 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Apr 12 22:10 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 103K Apr 12 22:10 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 22 14:28 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Apr 22 14:28 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 18 16:42 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:42 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 18 16:42 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2023-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1717182650930
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=ltsminxred
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=AutoFlight-PT-01b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Applying reductions before tool ltsmin
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-31 19:10:53] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -timeout, 360, -rebuildPNML]
[2024-05-31 19:10:53] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-31 19:10:53] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 130 ms
[2024-05-31 19:10:53] [INFO ] Transformed 114 places.
[2024-05-31 19:10:53] [INFO ] Transformed 112 transitions.
[2024-05-31 19:10:53] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-31 19:10:53] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 114 places and 112 transitions and 264 arcs in 384 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 25 ms.
Support contains 75 out of 114 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 114/114 places, 112/112 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 112 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 112 transition count 110
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 112 transition count 109
Applied a total of 5 rules in 61 ms. Remains 112 /114 variables (removed 2) and now considering 109/112 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 109 rows 112 cols
[2024-05-31 19:10:54] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 25 ms
[2024-05-31 19:10:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 363 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 19:10:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 19:10:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 206 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 655 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 108 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-31 19:10:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/112 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
[2024-05-31 19:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 77 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 74 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 105 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 99 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 88 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 87 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 89 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 103 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 83 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 93 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 75 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 68 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 80 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 113 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 75 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 67 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 69 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
[2024-05-31 19:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 96 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 8/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
[2024-05-31 19:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 72 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 96 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 70 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 75 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 6/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
[2024-05-31 19:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 88 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 2/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 109/221 variables, 112/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
[2024-05-31 19:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 71 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 3/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
[2024-05-31 19:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 79 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/221 variables, 1/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/221 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 221/221 variables, and 162 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved in 13476 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 112/112 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 108/108 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/112 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 40/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 109/221 variables, 112/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 108/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 0/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
[2024-05-31 19:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 64 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/221 variables, 3/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
[2024-05-31 19:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 1/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 0/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/221 variables, 0/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 221/221 variables, and 274 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved in 9174 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 112/112 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 108/108 constraints, Known Traps: 44/44 constraints]
After SMT, in 22739ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 22762ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 112/114 places, 109/112 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 23529 ms. Remains : 112/114 places, 109/112 transitions.
Support contains 75 out of 112 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-31 19:11:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 67 ms
[2024-05-31 19:11:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2024-05-31 19:11:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 109 transitions.
Support contains 74 out of 112 places (down from 75) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (593 resets) in 3144 ms. (12 steps per ms) remains 11/73 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (109 resets) in 350 ms. (113 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (156 resets) in 246 ms. (161 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (113 resets) in 149 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (114 resets) in 89 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (131 resets) in 130 ms. (305 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (114 resets) in 92 ms. (430 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (144 resets) in 100 ms. (396 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (121 resets) in 103 ms. (384 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (107 resets) in 78 ms. (506 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (114 resets) in 75 ms. (526 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (110 resets) in 88 ms. (449 steps per ms) remains 9/11 properties
[2024-05-31 19:11:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp38 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp45 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp52 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp72 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 84/103 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/107 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 5 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp11 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 5/112 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 109/221 variables, 112/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/221 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 221/221 variables, and 122 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 5 solved, 4 unsolved in 230 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 112/112 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 5 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 4 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp33 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 91/99 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 3 unsolved
[2024-05-31 19:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp55 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 4/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 6/105 variables, 2/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 2 unsolved
[2024-05-31 19:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 7/112 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 2 unsolved
[2024-05-31 19:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 86 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp27 is UNSAT
[2024-05-31 19:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 104 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 82 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-31 19:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 95 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp41 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 112/221 variables, and 20 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 9 solved, 0 unsolved in 936 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/112 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/9 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints]
After SMT, in 1191ms problems are : Problem set: 9 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 9 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-31 19:11:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-31 19:11:20] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2024-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 109 transitions.
Support contains 58 out of 112 places (down from 66) after GAL structural reductions.
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2024-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Computed a total of 35 stabilizing places and 35 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 109/109 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 101 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 101 transition count 98
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 101 transition count 97
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 98 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 98 transition count 94
Applied a total of 29 rules in 28 ms. Remains 98 /112 variables (removed 14) and now considering 94/109 (removed 15) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 29 ms. Remains : 98/112 places, 94/109 transitions.
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 94 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 109/109 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 99 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 99 transition count 96
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 99 transition count 95
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 95 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 95 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 94 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 94 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 93 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 93 transition count 89
Applied a total of 39 rules in 45 ms. Remains 93 /112 variables (removed 19) and now considering 89/109 (removed 20) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 45 ms. Remains : 93/112 places, 89/109 transitions.
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 89 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 109/109 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 37 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 37 transitions
Performed 37 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 37
Iterating post reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 111 transition count 71
Reduce places removed 37 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 74 transition count 66
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 72 transition count 66
Performed 18 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 18 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 72 transition count 48
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 54 transition count 48
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 129 place count 42 transition count 36
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 42 transition count 36
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 42 transition count 35
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 42 transition count 32
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 39 transition count 32
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 30 transition count 23
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 167 place count 29 transition count 22
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 28 transition count 22
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 28 transition count 21
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 170 place count 27 transition count 21
Applied a total of 170 rules in 49 ms. Remains 27 /112 variables (removed 85) and now considering 21/109 (removed 88) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 49 ms. Remains : 27/112 places, 21/109 transitions.
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 21 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 109/109 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 100 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 100 transition count 97
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 100 transition count 96
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 96 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 96 transition count 92
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 95 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 95 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 94 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 94 transition count 90
Applied a total of 37 rules in 14 ms. Remains 94 /112 variables (removed 18) and now considering 90/109 (removed 19) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 14 ms. Remains : 94/112 places, 90/109 transitions.
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 90 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 109/109 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 100 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 100 transition count 97
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 100 transition count 96
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 96 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 96 transition count 92
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 95 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 95 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 94 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 94 transition count 90
Applied a total of 37 rules in 14 ms. Remains 94 /112 variables (removed 18) and now considering 90/109 (removed 19) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 14 ms. Remains : 94/112 places, 90/109 transitions.
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 90 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 109/109 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 98 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 98 transition count 95
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 98 transition count 94
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 93 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 93 transition count 89
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 92 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 92 transition count 88
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 91 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 91 transition count 87
Applied a total of 43 rules in 12 ms. Remains 91 /112 variables (removed 21) and now considering 87/109 (removed 22) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12 ms. Remains : 91/112 places, 87/109 transitions.
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 87 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 109/109 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 102 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 102 transition count 99
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 102 transition count 98
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 100 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 100 transition count 96
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 99 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 99 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 98 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 98 transition count 94
Applied a total of 29 rules in 12 ms. Remains 98 /112 variables (removed 14) and now considering 94/109 (removed 15) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12 ms. Remains : 98/112 places, 94/109 transitions.
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 94 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 109/109 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 37 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 37 transitions
Performed 37 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 37
Iterating post reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 111 transition count 71
Reduce places removed 37 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 43 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 74 transition count 65
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 72 transition count 64
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 71 transition count 64
Performed 17 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 17 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 71 transition count 47
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 54 transition count 47
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 128 place count 44 transition count 37
Iterating global reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 44 transition count 37
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 44 transition count 35
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 42 transition count 35
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 32 transition count 25
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 31 transition count 24
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 164 place count 30 transition count 24
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 164 place count 30 transition count 23
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 29 transition count 23
Applied a total of 166 rules in 24 ms. Remains 29 /112 variables (removed 83) and now considering 23/109 (removed 86) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 24 ms. Remains : 29/112 places, 23/109 transitions.
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 23 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 109/109 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 36 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 36 transitions
Performed 36 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 36
Iterating post reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 111 transition count 72
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 75 transition count 69
Performed 17 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 17 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 75 transition count 52
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 58 transition count 52
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 120 place count 47 transition count 41
Iterating global reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 47 transition count 41
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 47 transition count 37
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 43 transition count 37
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 159 place count 33 transition count 27
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 32 transition count 26
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 31 transition count 26
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 31 transition count 25
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 30 transition count 25
Applied a total of 163 rules in 21 ms. Remains 30 /112 variables (removed 82) and now considering 25/109 (removed 84) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 21 ms. Remains : 30/112 places, 25/109 transitions.
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 25 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 109/109 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 101 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 101 transition count 98
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 101 transition count 97
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 97 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 97 transition count 93
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 96 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 96 transition count 92
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 95 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 95 transition count 91
Applied a total of 35 rules in 12 ms. Remains 95 /112 variables (removed 17) and now considering 91/109 (removed 18) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12 ms. Remains : 95/112 places, 91/109 transitions.
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 91 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 109/109 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 39 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 39 transitions
Performed 39 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 39
Iterating post reduction 0 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 111 transition count 69
Reduce places removed 39 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 72 transition count 63
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 70 transition count 63
Performed 17 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 17 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 70 transition count 46
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 53 transition count 46
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 130 place count 43 transition count 36
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 43 transition count 36
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 43 transition count 33
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 40 transition count 33
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 30 transition count 23
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 167 place count 29 transition count 22
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 28 transition count 22
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 28 transition count 21
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 170 place count 27 transition count 21
Applied a total of 170 rules in 21 ms. Remains 27 /112 variables (removed 85) and now considering 21/109 (removed 88) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 21 ms. Remains : 27/112 places, 21/109 transitions.
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 21 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 335 steps (40 resets) in 10 ms. (30 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 109/109 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 32 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 32 transitions
Performed 32 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 32
Iterating post reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 111 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 1 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 79 transition count 70
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 74 transition count 66
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 73 transition count 66
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 73 transition count 50
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 57 transition count 50
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 122 place count 47 transition count 40
Iterating global reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 47 transition count 40
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 47 transition count 38
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 45 transition count 38
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 35 transition count 28
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 34 transition count 27
Applied a total of 157 rules in 20 ms. Remains 34 /112 variables (removed 78) and now considering 27/109 (removed 82) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 21 ms. Remains : 34/112 places, 27/109 transitions.
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 27 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 112/112 places, 109/109 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 100 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 100 transition count 97
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 100 transition count 96
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 97 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 97 transition count 93
Applied a total of 31 rules in 6 ms. Remains 97 /112 variables (removed 15) and now considering 93/109 (removed 16) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7 ms. Remains : 97/112 places, 93/109 transitions.
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Export to MCC of 12 properties in file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.sr.xml took 6 ms.
[2024-05-31 19:11:21] [INFO ] Export to PNML in file /home/mcc/execution/model.sr.pnml of net with 112 places, 109 transitions and 258 arcs took 4 ms.
Total runtime 28485 ms.
There are residual formulas that ITS could not solve within timeout
Usage: pnml2lts-sym [-gvqh] [--order=
[--mu-opt] [--saturation=
[--sat-granularity=
[--guidance=
[--action=
[--trace=
[--mu=
[--ctl=
[--save-levels=STRING] [--pg-solve] [--attr=
[--saturating-attractor] [--write-strategy=
[--check-strategy] [--interactive-play] [--player]
[--pg-write=
[--edge-label=
[--mucalc=
[--allow-undefined-edges] [--allow-undefined-values]
[-p|--por=
[--weak=[valmari] (default: uses stronger left-commutativity)]
[--leap] [-r|--regroup=<(T,)+>] [--sloan-w1=
[--cw-max-cols=
[--mh-timeout=
[--graph-metrics] [--regroup-exit] [--regroup-time]
[-g|--pins-guards] [--vset=
[--ldd32-cache=
[--cache-ratio=
[--min-free-nodes=
[--fdd-reorder=
[--vset-cache-diff=
[--next-union] [--peak-nodes] [--maxsum=
[--block-size=
[--debug=
[--timeout=INT] [--version] [-h|--help] [--usage]
[OPTIONS]
Could not compute solution for formula : AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2024-00
Could not compute solution for formula : AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2024-01
Could not compute solution for formula : AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2024-02
Could not compute solution for formula : AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2024-03
Could not compute solution for formula : AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2024-04
Could not compute solution for formula : AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2024-05
Could not compute solution for formula : AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2024-07
Could not compute solution for formula : AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2024-09
Could not compute solution for formula : AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2024-10
Could not compute solution for formula : AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2023-12
Could not compute solution for formula : AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2023-14
Could not compute solution for formula : AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2023-15
BK_STOP 1717182682325
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -timeout 360 -rebuildPNML
mcc2024
ctl formula name AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2024-00
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/688/ctl_0_
ctl formula name AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2024-01
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/688/ctl_1_
ctl formula name AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2024-02
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/688/ctl_2_
ctl formula name AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2024-03
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/688/ctl_3_
ctl formula name AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2024-04
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/688/ctl_4_
ctl formula name AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2024-05
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/688/ctl_5_
ctl formula name AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2024-07
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/688/ctl_6_
ctl formula name AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2024-09
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/688/ctl_7_
ctl formula name AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2024-10
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/688/ctl_8_
ctl formula name AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2023-12
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/688/ctl_9_
ctl formula name AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2023-14
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/688/ctl_10_
ctl formula name AutoFlight-PT-01b-CTLFireability-2023-15
ctl formula formula --ctl=/tmp/688/ctl_11_
pnml2lts-sym, ** error **: unknown vector set implementation lddmc
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="AutoFlight-PT-01b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="ltsminxred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool ltsminxred"
echo " Input is AutoFlight-PT-01b, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r468-smll-171620166900066"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/AutoFlight-PT-01b.tgz
mv AutoFlight-PT-01b execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;