Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r461-smll-171701123000153.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool gold2023
Input is UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r461-smll-171701123000153
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 1.3M
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 23K Apr 13 05:45 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 154K Apr 13 05:45 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K Apr 13 05:42 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 137K Apr 13 05:42 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.0K Apr 23 08:04 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 34K Apr 23 08:04 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Apr 23 08:04 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 50K Apr 23 08:04 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 46K Apr 13 05:52 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 278K Apr 13 05:52 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 74K Apr 13 05:50 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 312K Apr 13 05:50 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.5K Apr 23 08:04 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.2K Apr 23 08:04 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 65K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1717188973461

bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=gold2023
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLFireability PT
Running Version 202304061127
[2024-05-31 20:56:16] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-31 20:56:16] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-31 20:56:16] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 69 ms
[2024-05-31 20:56:16] [INFO ] Transformed 80 places.
[2024-05-31 20:56:16] [INFO ] Transformed 150 transitions.
[2024-05-31 20:56:16] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 80 places and 150 transitions and 482 arcs in 196 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 16 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 4 formulas.
Ensure Unique test removed 32 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 32 transitions.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 68 out of 80 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 80/80 places, 118/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 17 ms. Remains 80 /80 variables (removed 0) and now considering 118/118 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 118 rows 80 cols
[2024-05-31 20:56:16] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 17 ms
[2024-05-31 20:56:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 243 ms returned [65]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 284 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 79/80 places, 118/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 79 /79 variables (removed 0) and now considering 118/118 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 308 ms. Remains : 79/80 places, 118/118 transitions.
Support contains 68 out of 79 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-31 20:56:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 45 ms
[2024-05-31 20:56:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2024-05-31 20:56:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 118 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 255 ms. (steps per millisecond=39 ) properties (out of 20) seen :19
Finished Best-First random walk after 680 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=170 )
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G((G((G(p1)||p0))||F(p2)))))'
Support contains 53 out of 79 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 118/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 79 /79 variables (removed 0) and now considering 118/118 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 118 rows 79 cols
[2024-05-31 20:56:18] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 7 ms
[2024-05-31 20:56:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 75 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 20:56:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 20:56:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 138 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 215 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 20:56:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 20:56:18] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 214 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 436 ms. Remains : 79/79 places, 118/118 transitions.
ANTLR Tool version 4.9.3 used for code generation does not match the current runtime version 4.7.2ANTLR Runtime version 4.9.3 used for parser compilation does not match the current runtime version 4.7.2ANTLR Tool version 4.9.3 used for code generation does not match the current runtime version 4.7.2ANTLR Runtime version 4.9.3 used for parser compilation does not match the current runtime version 4.7.2Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 326 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) p0 (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-00 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 3}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (AND (LT s22 1) (LT s23 1) (LT s24 1) (LT s25 1) (LT s26 1) (LT s27 1) (LT s28 1) (LT s29 1) (LT s30 1) (LT s31 1) (LT s32 1) (LT s33 1) (LT s34 1)...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 7031 reset in 731 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 7041 reset in 556 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), true, (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X p2)), (X (X (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)))))]
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 241 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 7 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 135 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) p0 (NOT p1))]
Finished random walk after 9 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 5 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=4 )
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), true, (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X p2)), (X (X (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2))))), (F (NOT (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)))), (F (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (F (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (F p2), (F (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 386 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 119 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) p0 (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 120 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) p0 (NOT p1))]
Support contains 53 out of 79 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 118/118 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 77 transition count 116
Applied a total of 4 rules in 30 ms. Remains 77 /79 variables (removed 2) and now considering 116/118 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 77 cols
[2024-05-31 20:56:21] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-31 20:56:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 20:56:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 20:56:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 99 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 165 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 20:56:21] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 20:56:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 20:56:21] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 130 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 77/79 places, 116/118 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 338 ms. Remains : 77/79 places, 116/118 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (NOT p2)), (X p2), (X (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2))), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X p2)), (X (X (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 349 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 118 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) p0 (NOT p1))]
Finished random walk after 6 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 5 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=6 )
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (NOT p2)), (X p2), (X (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2))), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X p2)), (X (X (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (F (NOT (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)))), (F (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (F (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (F p2), (F (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 548 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 120 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) p0 (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 117 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) p0 (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 118 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) p0 (NOT p1))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 7921 reset in 496 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 7896 reset in 487 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin1676347177055025981
[2024-05-31 20:56:23] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 116 transitions.
[2024-05-31 20:56:23] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 3 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-31 20:56:23] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 116 transitions.
[2024-05-31 20:56:23] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-31 20:56:23] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 116 transitions.
[2024-05-31 20:56:23] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-31 20:56:23] [INFO ] Built C files in 52ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin1676347177055025981
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin1676347177055025981;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 579 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin1676347177055025981;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 49 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin1676347177055025981;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased960149787483501612.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 3915 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-00 finished in 10549 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((p0||X(!p1))))'
Support contains 15 out of 79 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 118/118 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 55 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 55 transition count 94
Applied a total of 48 rules in 8 ms. Remains 55 /79 variables (removed 24) and now considering 94/118 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 55 cols
[2024-05-31 20:56:28] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-31 20:56:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 20:56:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 20:56:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 99 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 159 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 20:56:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 20:56:28] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 120 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 55/79 places, 94/118 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 292 ms. Remains : 55/79 places, 94/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 141 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p0) p1), p1]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-02 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}], [{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}], [{ cond=p1, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}]], initial=1, aps=[p0:(AND (LT s4 1) (LT s5 1)), p1:(OR (AND (GEQ s0 1) (GEQ s8 1) (GEQ s40 1)) (AND (GEQ s1 1) (GEQ s10 1) (GEQ s40 1)) (AND (GEQ s2 1) (GEQ s12 1) (GEQ s40...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, terminal, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null][false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-02 finished in 454 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(p0) U X(G((X(G(!p2))||p1)))))'
Support contains 33 out of 79 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 118/118 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 55 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 55 transition count 94
Applied a total of 48 rules in 4 ms. Remains 55 /79 variables (removed 24) and now considering 94/118 (removed 24) transitions.
[2024-05-31 20:56:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 20:56:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 20:56:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 20:56:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 110 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 20:56:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 20:56:29] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 97 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 55/79 places, 94/118 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 212 ms. Remains : 55/79 places, 94/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 313 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) p2), (AND p2 (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p1) p2), p2, true, (AND p2 (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) p2), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-04 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=p1, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p0) p1), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND p0 p1), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 5}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 0}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 1}, { cond=p0, acceptance={1} source=2 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={0, 1} source=2 dest: 6}], [{ cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 3}, { cond=p2, acceptance={} source=3 dest: 4}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0, 1} source=4 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) p2), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 5}, { cond=(AND p0 p2), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 7}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=6 dest: 0}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=6 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND p0 p2), acceptance={1} source=6 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=6 dest: 6}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), acceptance={0} source=6 dest: 6}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1) p2), acceptance={0, 1} source=6 dest: 6}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=7 dest: 4}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=7 dest: 7}]], initial=2, aps=[p1:(OR (GEQ s16 1) (GEQ s17 1) (GEQ s18 1) (GEQ s19 1) (GEQ s20 1) (GEQ s21 1) (GEQ s14 1) (GEQ s15 1) (AND (GEQ s0 1) (GEQ s8 1) (GEQ s40 1)) (AND (GEQ s...], nbAcceptance=2, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, no-univ-branch, stutter-sensitive], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-04 finished in 554 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(F(!p0))))'
Support contains 2 out of 79 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 118/118 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 55 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 55 transition count 94
Applied a total of 48 rules in 4 ms. Remains 55 /79 variables (removed 24) and now considering 94/118 (removed 24) transitions.
[2024-05-31 20:56:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 20:56:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 81 ms returned [40]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 92 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/79 places, 94/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 94/94 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 99 ms. Remains : 54/79 places, 94/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 109 ms :[p0, p0, p0]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-05 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=p0, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 0}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 1}]], initial=2, aps=[p0:(AND (LT s4 1) (LT s5 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null][false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 19344 reset in 134 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 19624 reset in 149 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 125 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 119 ms :[p0, p0, p0]
Finished random walk after 6 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=3 )
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 148 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 114 ms :[p0, p0, p0]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 118 ms :[p0, p0, p0]
Support contains 2 out of 54 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 94/94 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 94/94 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 54 cols
[2024-05-31 20:56:30] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-31 20:56:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 20:56:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 20:56:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 87 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 147 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 20:56:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 20:56:30] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 83 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 236 ms. Remains : 54/54 places, 94/94 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 120 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 112 ms :[p0, p0, p0]
Finished random walk after 6 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=6 )
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 143 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 115 ms :[p0, p0, p0]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 108 ms :[p0, p0, p0]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 110 ms :[p0, p0, p0]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 19330 reset in 125 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 19493 reset in 238 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 116 ms :[p0, p0, p0]
Support contains 2 out of 54 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 94/94 transitions.
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 54 transition count 102
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 54 transition count 102
Performed 18 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -6
Deduced a syphon composed of 26 places in 1 ms
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 54 transition count 108
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 54 transition count 100
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 51 transition count 76
Deduced a syphon composed of 26 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 51 transition count 76
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 33 transition count 46
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 33 transition count 46
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 88 place count 21 transition count 34
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 21 transition count 34
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 21 transition count 22
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 112 rules in 22 ms. Remains 21 /54 variables (removed 33) and now considering 22/94 (removed 72) transitions.
[2024-05-31 20:56:32] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 22 rows 21 cols
[2024-05-31 20:56:32] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-31 20:56:32] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 41 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 21/54 places, 22/94 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 78 ms. Remains : 21/54 places, 22/94 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin12930990538286423247
[2024-05-31 20:56:32] [INFO ] Built C files in 3ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin12930990538286423247
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin12930990538286423247;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 264 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin12930990538286423247;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 29 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin12930990538286423247;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased1446981750454463911.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 875 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-05 finished in 4158 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((X(!p1)||p0)))'
Support contains 4 out of 79 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 118/118 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 55 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 55 transition count 94
Applied a total of 48 rules in 5 ms. Remains 55 /79 variables (removed 24) and now considering 94/118 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 55 cols
[2024-05-31 20:56:33] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-31 20:56:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 91 ms returned [40]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 92 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/79 places, 94/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 94/94 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 99 ms. Remains : 54/79 places, 94/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 78 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-06 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p0) p1), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (GEQ s43 1) (GEQ s42 1)), p1:(AND (LT s4 1) (LT s5 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null][false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 194 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 220 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 17 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 2 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-06 finished in 633 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(!p0)))'
Support contains 13 out of 79 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 118/118 transitions.
Performed 32 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 32
Iterating post reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 79 transition count 86
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 47 transition count 78
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 47 transition count 70
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 39 transition count 70
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 37 transition count 68
Applied a total of 92 rules in 12 ms. Remains 37 /79 variables (removed 42) and now considering 68/118 (removed 50) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 37 cols
[2024-05-31 20:56:34] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-31 20:56:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 20:56:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 20:56:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 100 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 20:56:34] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 20:56:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 20:56:34] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 63 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 37/79 places, 68/118 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 186 ms. Remains : 37/79 places, 68/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 37 ms :[p0]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-07 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=p0, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (AND (GEQ s0 1) (GEQ s6 1) (GEQ s22 1)) (AND (GEQ s1 1) (GEQ s8 1) (GEQ s22 1)) (AND (GEQ s2 1) (GEQ s10 1) (GEQ s22 1)) (AND (GEQ s0 1) (GEQ s11 1...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 460 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 127 steps with 0 reset with depth 128 and stack size 128 in 1 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-07 finished in 700 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 5 out of 79 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 118/118 transitions.
Performed 32 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 32
Iterating post reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 79 transition count 86
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 47 transition count 78
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 47 transition count 71
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 40 transition count 71
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 88 place count 38 transition count 55
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 38 transition count 55
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 94 place count 34 transition count 51
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 34 transition count 51
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 31 transition count 45
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 31 transition count 45
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 107 place count 28 transition count 39
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 28 transition count 39
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 28 transition count 36
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 25 transition count 33
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 24 transition count 32
Applied a total of 121 rules in 18 ms. Remains 24 /79 variables (removed 55) and now considering 32/118 (removed 86) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 24 cols
[2024-05-31 20:56:35] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-31 20:56:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 20:56:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 20:56:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 85 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 20:56:35] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 20:56:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 20:56:35] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 41 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 24/79 places, 32/118 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 152 ms. Remains : 24/79 places, 32/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 36 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-09 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(AND (GEQ s0 1) (GEQ s6 1) (GEQ s15 1) (GEQ s13 1) (GEQ s18 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 122 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 18 steps with 0 reset with depth 19 and stack size 19 in 0 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-09 finished in 328 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 79 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 118/118 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 55 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 55 transition count 94
Applied a total of 48 rules in 4 ms. Remains 55 /79 variables (removed 24) and now considering 94/118 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 55 cols
[2024-05-31 20:56:35] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-31 20:56:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 87 ms returned [40]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 89 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/79 places, 94/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 94/94 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 96 ms. Remains : 54/79 places, 94/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 87 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-11 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 0}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}]], initial=1, aps=[p0:(GEQ s40 1)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, terminal, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null][false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-11 finished in 197 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(p0) U (X(G(p1)) U (p2||X(G(!p2))))))'
Support contains 4 out of 79 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 118/118 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 55 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 55 transition count 94
Applied a total of 48 rules in 3 ms. Remains 55 /79 variables (removed 24) and now considering 94/118 (removed 24) transitions.
[2024-05-31 20:56:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 20:56:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned [40]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 71 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/79 places, 94/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 94/94 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 77 ms. Remains : 54/79 places, 94/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 198 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2), (AND (NOT p0) p2), (NOT p0), false]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-12 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(AND (NOT p0) p1), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(AND p2 (NOT p0) p1), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) p1), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND p2 (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p0), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND p2 (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p0), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p0), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 4}]], initial=4, aps=[p0:(AND (GEQ s34 1) (GEQ s43 1) (GEQ s42 1)), p1:(AND (GEQ s37 1) (GEQ s43 1)), p2:(AND (GEQ s34 1) (GEQ s43 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 45 reset in 113 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 129 steps with 0 reset with depth 130 and stack size 130 in 1 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-12 finished in 412 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((p0 U X(G((p1||X((G(p2) U (p1&&G(p2))))))))))'
Support contains 5 out of 79 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 118/118 transitions.
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 56 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 56 transition count 95
Applied a total of 46 rules in 3 ms. Remains 56 /79 variables (removed 23) and now considering 95/118 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 95 rows 56 cols
[2024-05-31 20:56:36] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-31 20:56:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 79 ms returned [41]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 81 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 55/79 places, 95/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 55 /55 variables (removed 0) and now considering 95/95 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 85 ms. Remains : 55/79 places, 95/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 402 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), true, (NOT p2), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-13 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 2}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 1}, { cond=p0, acceptance={1} source=2 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={0, 1} source=2 dest: 7}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) p2), acceptance={0, 1} source=3 dest: 3}, { cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND p1 p2), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 5}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0, 1} source=4 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 4}, { cond=p2, acceptance={} source=5 dest: 5}], [{ cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={} source=6 dest: 1}, { cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=6 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND p1 p2), acceptance={} source=6 dest: 8}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=7 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p2)), acceptance={1} source=7 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2), acceptance={} source=7 dest: 6}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={0, 1} source=7 dest: 7}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) p1 p2), acceptance={} source=7 dest: 8}, { cond=(AND p0 p1 p2), acceptance={} source=7 dest: 9}], [{ cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={} source=8 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=8 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) p2), acceptance={} source=8 dest: 5}, { cond=(AND p1 p2), acceptance={} source=8 dest: 8}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=9 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p2)), acceptance={1} source=9 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), acceptance={0, 1} source=9 dest: 7}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) p2), acceptance={} source=9 dest: 8}, { cond=(AND p0 p1 p2), acceptance={} source=9 dest: 9}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1) p2), acceptance={0} source=9 dest: 9}]], initial=0, aps=[p1:(LT s30 1), p0:(AND (GEQ s37 1) (GEQ s44 1)), p2:(AND (GEQ s32 1) (GEQ s43 1))], nbAcceptance=2, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, no-univ-branch, stutter-sensitive], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 68 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-13 finished in 514 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)&&F((G(p1)&&X(X(G(p2))))))))'
Support contains 5 out of 79 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 118/118 transitions.
Performed 31 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 31
Iterating post reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 79 transition count 87
Reduce places removed 31 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 48 transition count 80
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 48 transition count 72
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 40 transition count 72
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 87 place count 38 transition count 56
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 38 transition count 56
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 93 place count 34 transition count 52
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 34 transition count 52
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 30 transition count 44
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 30 transition count 44
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 109 place count 26 transition count 36
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 26 transition count 36
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 26 transition count 32
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 23 transition count 29
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 23 transition count 29
Applied a total of 124 rules in 17 ms. Remains 23 /79 variables (removed 56) and now considering 29/118 (removed 89) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 29 rows 23 cols
[2024-05-31 20:56:36] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-31 20:56:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 20:56:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 20:56:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 43 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 79 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 20:56:36] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 20:56:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 20:56:36] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 34 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 23/79 places, 29/118 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 144 ms. Remains : 23/79 places, 29/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 343 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p0), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p1), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-14 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 2}, { cond=p1, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 3}, { cond=p1, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0, 1} source=1 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={0, 1} source=2 dest: 2}, { cond=p1, acceptance={1} source=2 dest: 3}, { cond=p1, acceptance={0, 1} source=2 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={0, 1} source=3 dest: 2}, { cond=p1, acceptance={1} source=3 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={0, 1} source=4 dest: 5}, { cond=p1, acceptance={1} source=4 dest: 6}, { cond=p1, acceptance={0, 1} source=4 dest: 7}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), acceptance={0, 1} source=5 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND p1 (NOT p2)), acceptance={1} source=5 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND p1 (NOT p2)), acceptance={0, 1} source=5 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) p2), acceptance={0} source=5 dest: 5}, { cond=(AND p1 p2), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 6}, { cond=(AND p1 p2), acceptance={0} source=5 dest: 7}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), acceptance={0, 1} source=6 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND p1 (NOT p2)), acceptance={1} source=6 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) p2), acceptance={0} source=7 dest: 5}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), acceptance={0, 1} source=7 dest: 5}, { cond=(AND p1 p2), acceptance={} source=7 dest: 6}, { cond=(AND p1 (NOT p2)), acceptance={1} source=7 dest: 6}, { cond=(AND p1 p2), acceptance={0} source=7 dest: 7}, { cond=(AND p1 (NOT p2)), acceptance={0, 1} source=7 dest: 7}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (LT s0 1) (LT s4 1) (LT s14 1)), p1:(LT s17 1), p2:(LT s12 1)], nbAcceptance=2, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null][true, true, true, true, true, true, true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 6360 reset in 186 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 81 steps with 5 reset with depth 36 and stack size 34 in 0 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-14 finished in 698 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 79 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 118/118 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 31 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 31 transitions
Performed 31 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 31
Iterating post reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 79 transition count 87
Reduce places removed 31 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 48 transition count 80
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 48 transition count 72
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 40 transition count 72
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 87 place count 38 transition count 56
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 38 transition count 56
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 93 place count 34 transition count 52
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 34 transition count 52
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 30 transition count 44
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 30 transition count 44
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 109 place count 26 transition count 36
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 26 transition count 36
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 26 transition count 32
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 18 transition count 24
Applied a total of 133 rules in 14 ms. Remains 18 /79 variables (removed 61) and now considering 24/118 (removed 94) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 24 rows 18 cols
[2024-05-31 20:56:37] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-31 20:56:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned [13]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 38 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 17/79 places, 24/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 17 /17 variables (removed 0) and now considering 24/24 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 54 ms. Remains : 17/79 places, 24/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 79 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-15 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(GEQ s12 1)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null][true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1894 reset in 169 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 54 steps with 1 reset with depth 26 and stack size 26 in 0 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-15 finished in 318 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 21519 ms.

BK_STOP 1717188998526

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202304061127.jar
+ VERSION=202304061127
+ echo 'Running Version 202304061127'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="gold2023"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool gold2023"
echo " Input is UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r461-smll-171701123000153"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02.tgz
mv UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;