About the Execution of 2023-gold for UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
366.239 | 18622.00 | 34968.00 | 477.40 | FFFFFFFTFFTFFFTF | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r461-smll-171701123000152.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
........................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool gold2023
Input is UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02, examination is LTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r461-smll-171701123000152
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 1.3M
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 23K Apr 13 05:45 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 154K Apr 13 05:45 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K Apr 13 05:42 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 137K Apr 13 05:42 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.0K Apr 23 08:04 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 34K Apr 23 08:04 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Apr 23 08:04 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 50K Apr 23 08:04 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 46K Apr 13 05:52 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 278K Apr 13 05:52 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 74K Apr 13 05:50 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 312K Apr 13 05:50 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.5K Apr 23 08:04 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.2K Apr 23 08:04 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 65K May 18 16:43 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-00
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-01
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-02
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-03
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-04
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-05
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-06
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-07
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-08
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-09
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1717188945382
bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=gold2023
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202304061127
[2024-05-31 20:55:47] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-31 20:55:47] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-31 20:55:48] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 69 ms
[2024-05-31 20:55:48] [INFO ] Transformed 80 places.
[2024-05-31 20:55:48] [INFO ] Transformed 150 transitions.
[2024-05-31 20:55:48] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 80 places and 150 transitions and 482 arcs in 199 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLCardinality.xml in 14 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
Ensure Unique test removed 32 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 32 transitions.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 78 out of 80 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 80/80 places, 118/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 13 ms. Remains 80 /80 variables (removed 0) and now considering 118/118 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 118 rows 80 cols
[2024-05-31 20:55:48] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 17 ms
[2024-05-31 20:55:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 205 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 20:55:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 20:55:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 136 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 386 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 20:55:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 20:55:49] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 196 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 597 ms. Remains : 80/80 places, 118/118 transitions.
Support contains 78 out of 80 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-31 20:55:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 69 ms
[2024-05-31 20:55:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-05-31 20:55:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 118 transitions.
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 740 ms. (steps per millisecond=13 ) properties (out of 24) seen :19
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 88 ms. (steps per millisecond=113 ) properties (out of 5) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 74 ms. (steps per millisecond=135 ) properties (out of 5) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 67 ms. (steps per millisecond=149 ) properties (out of 5) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 74 ms. (steps per millisecond=135 ) properties (out of 5) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 60 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties (out of 5) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 5 properties.
[2024-05-31 20:55:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 20:55:50] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 7 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2024-05-31 20:55:50] [INFO ] After 96ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :5 sat :0
Fused 5 Parikh solutions to 0 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Successfully simplified 5 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 10 out of 80 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 80/80 places, 118/118 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 32 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 32 transitions
Performed 32 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 32
Iterating post reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 80 transition count 86
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 48 transition count 78
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 45 transition count 54
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 45 transition count 54
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 84 place count 39 transition count 48
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 39 transition count 48
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 34 transition count 44
Applied a total of 99 rules in 24 ms. Remains 34 /80 variables (removed 46) and now considering 44/118 (removed 74) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 34 cols
[2024-05-31 20:55:51] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-31 20:55:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned [26, 27]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 61 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 32/80 places, 44/118 transitions.
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 32 transition count 36
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 24 transition count 36
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 22 transition count 34
Applied a total of 20 rules in 11 ms. Remains 22 /32 variables (removed 10) and now considering 34/44 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 34 rows 22 cols
[2024-05-31 20:55:51] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-31 20:55:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 20:55:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 20:55:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 42 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 77 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 22/80 places, 34/118 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 173 ms. Remains : 22/80 places, 34/118 transitions.
ANTLR Tool version 4.9.3 used for code generation does not match the current runtime version 4.7.2ANTLR Runtime version 4.9.3 used for parser compilation does not match the current runtime version 4.7.2ANTLR Tool version 4.9.3 used for code generation does not match the current runtime version 4.7.2ANTLR Runtime version 4.9.3 used for parser compilation does not match the current runtime version 4.7.2Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 261 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-00 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(LEQ (ADD s20 s21) (ADD s10 s11 s12 s13 s14 s15 s16 s17))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null][true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 7427 reset in 445 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 164 steps with 14 reset with depth 16 and stack size 16 in 1 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-00 finished in 956 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((p0 U p1)))'
Support contains 11 out of 80 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 80/80 places, 118/118 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 56 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 56 transition count 94
Applied a total of 48 rules in 7 ms. Remains 56 /80 variables (removed 24) and now considering 94/118 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 56 cols
[2024-05-31 20:55:52] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-31 20:55:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 135 ms returned [40]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 136 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 55/80 places, 94/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 55 /55 variables (removed 0) and now considering 94/94 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 145 ms. Remains : 55/80 places, 94/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 114 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), true]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-03 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 2}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 0}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}]], initial=1, aps=[p1:(LEQ 2 s40), p0:(LEQ (ADD s41 s42) (ADD s30 s31 s32 s33 s34 s35 s36 s37))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null][false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 339 steps with 64 reset in 4 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-03 finished in 307 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G(p0)))'
Support contains 4 out of 80 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 80/80 places, 118/118 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 56 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 56 transition count 94
Applied a total of 48 rules in 6 ms. Remains 56 /80 variables (removed 24) and now considering 94/118 (removed 24) transitions.
[2024-05-31 20:55:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 20:55:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 99 ms returned [40, 41]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 101 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/80 places, 94/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 94/94 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 109 ms. Remains : 54/80 places, 94/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 90 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-04 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 0}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}]], initial=1, aps=[p0:(GT (ADD s42 s43) (ADD s38 s39))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, terminal, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null][false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-04 finished in 216 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)&&F(G(p1)))))'
Support contains 4 out of 80 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 80/80 places, 118/118 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 32 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 32 transitions
Performed 32 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 32
Iterating post reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 80 transition count 86
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 48 transition count 78
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 48 transition count 70
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 40 transition count 70
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 91 place count 37 transition count 46
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 37 transition count 46
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 100 place count 31 transition count 40
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 31 transition count 40
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 112 place count 25 transition count 28
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 25 transition count 28
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 124 place count 19 transition count 22
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 19 transition count 22
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 19 transition count 16
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 19 transition count 14
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 17 transition count 14
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 15 transition count 12
Applied a total of 144 rules in 15 ms. Remains 15 /80 variables (removed 65) and now considering 12/118 (removed 106) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 12 rows 15 cols
[2024-05-31 20:55:52] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-31 20:55:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned [0, 5, 6]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 34 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 12/80 places, 12/118 transitions.
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 12 transition count 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 10 transition count 10
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 10 /12 variables (removed 2) and now considering 10/12 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 10 rows 10 cols
[2024-05-31 20:55:52] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-31 20:55:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned [0, 1]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 33 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 8/80 places, 10/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 8 /8 variables (removed 0) and now considering 10/10 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 3 iterations and 85 ms. Remains : 8/80 places, 10/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 125 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-06 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}], [{ cond=p1, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}, { cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(LEQ 1 (ADD s4 s5)), p1:(GT (ADD s4 s5) (ADD s0 s1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null, null, null][true, true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 152 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 13 steps with 0 reset with depth 14 and stack size 14 in 1 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-06 finished in 378 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X((X((p0&&X(F(p1))))||(p2 U (p3||G(p2)))))))'
Support contains 69 out of 80 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 80/80 places, 118/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 80 /80 variables (removed 0) and now considering 118/118 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 118 rows 80 cols
[2024-05-31 20:55:52] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-31 20:55:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned [65]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 56 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 79/80 places, 118/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 79 /79 variables (removed 0) and now considering 118/118 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 58 ms. Remains : 79/80 places, 118/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 380 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3) (NOT p2)), true, (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-07 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2) p0), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p3) p2 p0), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND (NOT p3) p2 (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 8}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p3) p2 (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 3}], [{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=4 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 3}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=5 dest: 6}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=6 dest: 7}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p3) p2), acceptance={} source=7 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=7 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=8 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND (NOT p3) p2), acceptance={} source=8 dest: 8}]], initial=5, aps=[p1:(OR (GT 3 s64) (GT (ADD s6 s7 s8 s9 s10 s11 s12 s13) (ADD s71 s72 s73 s74 s75 s76 s77 s78))), p3:(AND (GT (ADD s14 s15 s16 s17 s18 s19 s20 s21) (ADD s2...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 13599 reset in 260 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 13635 reset in 334 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3) (NOT p2) p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p3) p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) p2)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2)))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 296 ms. Reduced automaton from 9 states, 16 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 9 states, 16 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 389 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), true, (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3))]
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 162 ms. (steps per millisecond=61 ) properties (out of 10) seen :8
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10001 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 63 ms. (steps per millisecond=158 ) properties (out of 2) seen :0
Incomplete Best-First random walk after 10000 steps, including 2 resets, run finished after 39 ms. (steps per millisecond=256 ) properties (out of 2) seen :0
Running SMT prover for 2 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 118 rows 79 cols
[2024-05-31 20:55:54] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-31 20:55:54] [INFO ] After 38ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :1 sat :0 real:1
[2024-05-31 20:55:55] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 6 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2024-05-31 20:55:55] [INFO ] After 67ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :2 sat :0
Fused 2 Parikh solutions to 0 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Found 2 invariant AP formulas.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3) (NOT p2) p0), (G (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p3)))), (G (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p3))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p3) p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) p2)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2))))), (F (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3)))), (F p1), (F (AND p0 p2 (NOT p3))), (F (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p3)))), (F (AND p2 (NOT p3))), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 434 ms. Reduced automaton from 9 states, 16 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 8 states, 12 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 322 ms :[(NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 373 ms :[(NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), true]
[2024-05-31 20:55:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 20:55:56] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 6 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2024-05-31 20:55:56] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2024-05-31 20:55:56] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 66 ms returned sat
[2024-05-31 20:55:56] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-05-31 20:55:56] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 6 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2024-05-31 20:55:56] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2024-05-31 20:55:56] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 55 ms returned sat
[2024-05-31 20:55:56] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 116/178/116 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 15 ms.
[2024-05-31 20:55:56] [INFO ] Added : 116 causal constraints over 24 iterations in 345 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))
Support contains 69 out of 79 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 118/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 79 /79 variables (removed 0) and now considering 118/118 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-31 20:55:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 20:55:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 20:55:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 20:55:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 95 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 142 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 20:55:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 20:55:57] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 102 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 248 ms. Remains : 79/79 places, 118/118 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3) p0 (NOT p2))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (AND p2 (NOT p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 (NOT p3)))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 197 ms. Reduced automaton from 8 states, 12 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 8 states, 12 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 341 ms :[(NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), true, (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)))]
Finished random walk after 21 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 8 properties in 4 ms. (steps per millisecond=5 )
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3) p0 (NOT p2))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (AND p2 (NOT p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p2 (NOT p3))))), (F (AND p2 (NOT p3))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)))), (F (AND p0 p2 (NOT p3))), (F (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p3)))), (F p1), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)))), (F (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 370 ms. Reduced automaton from 8 states, 12 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 8 states, 12 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 308 ms :[(NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), true, (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 315 ms :[(NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), true, (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)))]
[2024-05-31 20:55:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 20:55:58] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 6 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2024-05-31 20:55:58] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2024-05-31 20:55:59] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 57 ms returned sat
[2024-05-31 20:55:59] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-05-31 20:55:59] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 6 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2024-05-31 20:55:59] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2024-05-31 20:55:59] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 52 ms returned sat
[2024-05-31 20:55:59] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 116/178/116 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 12 ms.
[2024-05-31 20:55:59] [INFO ] Added : 116 causal constraints over 24 iterations in 284 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 316 ms :[(NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), true, (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 13679 reset in 238 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 13717 reset in 298 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, true, false, false, false, false, true, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 308 ms :[(NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), true, (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)))]
Support contains 69 out of 79 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 118/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 79 /79 variables (removed 0) and now considering 118/118 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-31 20:56:00] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 20:56:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 20:56:01] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 109 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 123 ms. Remains : 79/79 places, 118/118 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin2191506988581791286
[2024-05-31 20:56:01] [INFO ] Built C files in 7ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin2191506988581791286
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin2191506988581791286;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 470 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin2191506988581791286;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 45 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin2191506988581791286;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased454883927010515744.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 333 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-07 finished in 9049 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 80 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 80/80 places, 118/118 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 56 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 56 transition count 94
Applied a total of 48 rules in 4 ms. Remains 56 /80 variables (removed 24) and now considering 94/118 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 56 cols
[2024-05-31 20:56:01] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-31 20:56:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned [41]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 61 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 55/80 places, 94/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 55 /55 variables (removed 0) and now considering 94/94 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 67 ms. Remains : 55/80 places, 94/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 90 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-08 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 0}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}]], initial=1, aps=[p0:(GT s0 s40)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, terminal, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null][false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-08 finished in 171 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((p0&&F(p1)&&X(X(G(p0))))))'
Support contains 3 out of 80 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 80/80 places, 118/118 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 56 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 56 transition count 94
Applied a total of 48 rules in 6 ms. Remains 56 /80 variables (removed 24) and now considering 94/118 (removed 24) transitions.
[2024-05-31 20:56:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 20:56:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned [40, 41]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 78 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/80 places, 94/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 94/94 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 86 ms. Remains : 54/80 places, 94/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 232 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-11 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=p0, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 4}, { cond=p0, acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 5}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 4}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=3 dest: 5}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=5 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 4}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=5 dest: 5}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(GT 1 s34), p1:(GT s38 s31)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-sensitive], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 22501 reset in 283 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 311 steps with 61 reset with depth 9 and stack size 9 in 1 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-11 finished in 622 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((p0&&G(p1))))'
Support contains 3 out of 80 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 80/80 places, 118/118 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 56 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 56 transition count 94
Applied a total of 48 rules in 4 ms. Remains 56 /80 variables (removed 24) and now considering 94/118 (removed 24) transitions.
[2024-05-31 20:56:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 20:56:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 94 ms returned [40, 41]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 96 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/80 places, 94/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 94/94 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 103 ms. Remains : 54/80 places, 94/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 126 ms :[true, (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-15 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 0}, { cond=p1, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND p0 p1), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 2}]], initial=1, aps=[p1:(LEQ s49 s12), p0:(LEQ 1 s44)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, terminal, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-15 finished in 244 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 15000 ms.
BK_STOP 1717188964004
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202304061127.jar
+ VERSION=202304061127
+ echo 'Running Version 202304061127'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="gold2023"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool gold2023"
echo " Input is UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02, examination is LTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r461-smll-171701123000152"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02.tgz
mv UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;