Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r461-smll-171701122900118.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool gold2023
Input is UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r461-smll-171701122900118
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 748K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 13 05:10 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 110K Apr 13 05:10 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 13 05:06 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 81K Apr 13 05:06 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.1K Apr 23 08:04 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 36K Apr 23 08:04 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K Apr 23 08:04 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K Apr 23 08:04 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 13 05:16 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 111K Apr 13 05:16 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 38K Apr 13 05:14 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 184K Apr 13 05:14 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.5K Apr 23 08:04 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.1K Apr 23 08:04 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 47K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1717176493410

bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=gold2023
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLFireability PT
Running Version 202304061127
[2024-05-31 17:28:15] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-31 17:28:16] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-31 17:28:16] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 81 ms
[2024-05-31 17:28:16] [INFO ] Transformed 72 places.
[2024-05-31 17:28:16] [INFO ] Transformed 108 transitions.
[2024-05-31 17:28:16] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 72 places and 108 transitions and 340 arcs in 242 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 19 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 4 formulas.
[2024-05-31 17:28:16] [INFO ] Reduced 4 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-31 17:28:16] [INFO ] Reduced 4 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-31 17:28:16] [INFO ] Reduced 4 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-31 17:28:16] [INFO ] Reduced 4 identical enabling conditions.
Ensure Unique test removed 16 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 16 transitions.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 49 out of 72 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 66 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 66 transition count 86
Applied a total of 12 rules in 27 ms. Remains 66 /72 variables (removed 6) and now considering 86/92 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 66 cols
[2024-05-31 17:28:16] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 10 ms
[2024-05-31 17:28:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 270 ms returned [45]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 323 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 65/72 places, 86/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 65 /65 variables (removed 0) and now considering 86/86 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 359 ms. Remains : 65/72 places, 86/92 transitions.
Support contains 49 out of 65 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-31 17:28:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 107 ms
[2024-05-31 17:28:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 47 ms
[2024-05-31 17:28:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 86 transitions.
Finished random walk after 912 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 23 properties in 116 ms. (steps per millisecond=7 )
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((p0 U p1)||X(X(X(F(p2))))))'
Support contains 19 out of 65 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 86/86 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 63 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 63 transition count 84
Applied a total of 4 rules in 8 ms. Remains 63 /65 variables (removed 2) and now considering 84/86 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2024-05-31 17:28:18] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 8 ms
[2024-05-31 17:28:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 148 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 17:28:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 17:28:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 222 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 379 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 17:28:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 17:28:22] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 3254 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/65 places, 84/86 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3643 ms. Remains : 63/65 places, 84/86 transitions.
ANTLR Tool version 4.9.3 used for code generation does not match the current runtime version 4.7.2ANTLR Runtime version 4.9.3 used for parser compilation does not match the current runtime version 4.7.2ANTLR Tool version 4.9.3 used for code generation does not match the current runtime version 4.7.2ANTLR Runtime version 4.9.3 used for parser compilation does not match the current runtime version 4.7.2Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 552 ms :[(NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-00 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) p0 (NOT p2)), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 3}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=3 dest: 0}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 5}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 6}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=6 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={} source=6 dest: 1}]], initial=4, aps=[p2:(OR (GEQ s41 1) (GEQ s40 1) (GEQ s39 1) (GEQ s38 1)), p1:(OR (GEQ s44 1) (GEQ s43 1) (GEQ s46 1) (GEQ s45 1)), p0:(OR (AND (GEQ s0 1) (GEQ s7 1) (GEQ s...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 22700 reset in 655 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 22649 reset in 302 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))), true]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 259 ms. Reduced automaton from 7 states, 11 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 198 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
Finished random walk after 1 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))), true]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (F p2)]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 245 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 230 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 329 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
[2024-05-31 17:28:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 17:28:25] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2024-05-31 17:28:25] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2024-05-31 17:28:25] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 69 ms returned sat
[2024-05-31 17:28:25] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-05-31 17:28:25] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 12 ms returned sat
[2024-05-31 17:28:25] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2024-05-31 17:28:25] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 102 ms returned sat
[2024-05-31 17:28:25] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 80/124/80 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 58 ms.
[2024-05-31 17:28:25] [INFO ] Added : 20 causal constraints over 4 iterations in 193 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p2)
Support contains 4 out of 63 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Property had overlarge support with respect to TGBA, discarding it for now.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 63/63 places, 84/84 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 63 /63 variables (removed 0) and now considering 84/84 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-31 17:28:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 17:28:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 112 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 17:28:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 17:28:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 176 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 294 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 17:28:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 17:28:26] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 409 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 711 ms. Remains : 63/63 places, 84/84 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p2), true]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 123 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 175 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
Finished random walk after 1 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=1 )
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p2), true]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p2)]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 105 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 259 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 223 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
[2024-05-31 17:28:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 17:28:27] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2024-05-31 17:28:27] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2024-05-31 17:28:27] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 42 ms returned sat
[2024-05-31 17:28:27] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-05-31 17:28:27] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2024-05-31 17:28:27] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2024-05-31 17:28:27] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 84 ms returned sat
[2024-05-31 17:28:27] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 80/124/80 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 22 ms.
[2024-05-31 17:28:27] [INFO ] Added : 20 causal constraints over 4 iterations in 84 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p2)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 311 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 22637 reset in 382 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 22648 reset in 364 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, false, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 134 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (NOT p2)]
Support contains 4 out of 63 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 63/63 places, 84/84 transitions.
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 63 transition count 92
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 63 transition count 92
Performed 20 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 28 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 63 transition count 92
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 63 transition count 84
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 62 transition count 76
Deduced a syphon composed of 28 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 62 transition count 76
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 50 transition count 56
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 50 transition count 56
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 42 transition count 48
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 42 transition count 48
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 42 transition count 44
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 82 rules in 42 ms. Remains 42 /63 variables (removed 21) and now considering 44/84 (removed 40) transitions.
[2024-05-31 17:28:29] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 42 cols
[2024-05-31 17:28:29] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-31 17:28:29] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 73 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 42/63 places, 44/84 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 124 ms. Remains : 42/63 places, 44/84 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin599667293480737140
[2024-05-31 17:28:29] [INFO ] Built C files in 6ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin599667293480737140
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin599667293480737140;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 425 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin599667293480737140;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 60 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin599667293480737140;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased4215726711915065723.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 194 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-00 finished in 11823 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((X(G(p0))&&((X((!p1||X(!p2)))&&F(!p3))||X(G((!p1||X(!p2)))))))'
Support contains 35 out of 65 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 86/86 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 63 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 63 transition count 84
Applied a total of 4 rules in 4 ms. Remains 63 /65 variables (removed 2) and now considering 84/86 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2024-05-31 17:28:30] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-05-31 17:28:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 17:28:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 17:28:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 125 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 17:28:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 17:28:30] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 84 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/65 places, 84/86 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 217 ms. Remains : 63/65 places, 84/86 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 300 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (AND p1 p2)), (NOT p0), (AND p1 p2), (AND p3 p1 p2), true, p2, (AND p3 p2), p3]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-01 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 2}, { cond=p3, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 3}], [{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 4}], [{ cond=p1, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 5}], [{ cond=p3, acceptance={} source=3 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND p3 p1), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 6}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=4 dest: 4}], [{ cond=p2, acceptance={} source=5 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(AND p3 p2), acceptance={} source=6 dest: 7}], [{ cond=p3, acceptance={0} source=7 dest: 7}]], initial=0, aps=[p3:(OR (GEQ s16 1) (GEQ s17 1) (GEQ s18 1) (GEQ s19 1) (GEQ s20 1) (GEQ s21 1) (GEQ s14 1) (GEQ s15 1)), p0:(AND (LT s2 1) (LT s3 1) (LT s4 1) (LT s5 1)),...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 3 steps with 1 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-01 finished in 544 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(F((G(!p1)&&p0)))))'
Support contains 8 out of 65 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 86/86 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 63 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 63 transition count 84
Applied a total of 4 rules in 5 ms. Remains 63 /65 variables (removed 2) and now considering 84/86 (removed 2) transitions.
[2024-05-31 17:28:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 17:28:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 84 ms returned [42]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 85 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/65 places, 84/86 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 62 /62 variables (removed 0) and now considering 84/84 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 93 ms. Remains : 62/65 places, 84/86 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 155 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) p1), (OR (NOT p0) p1), (OR (NOT p0) p1), p1]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-03 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(OR (NOT p0) p1), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 3}], [{ cond=p1, acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 2}, { cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 3}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(AND (LT s43 1) (LT s42 1) (LT s45 1) (LT s44 1)), p1:(OR (GEQ s41 1) (GEQ s40 1) (GEQ s39 1) (GEQ s38 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 275 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 157 steps with 0 reset with depth 158 and stack size 158 in 4 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-03 finished in 563 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((G((F(!p1) U X(p2)))||p0)))'
Support contains 23 out of 65 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 86/86 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 65 transition count 82
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 61 transition count 80
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 55 transition count 74
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 55 transition count 68
Applied a total of 28 rules in 16 ms. Remains 55 /65 variables (removed 10) and now considering 68/86 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 55 cols
[2024-05-31 17:28:31] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-31 17:28:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 17:28:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 17:28:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 121 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 17:28:31] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 17:28:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 17:28:31] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 81 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 55/65 places, 68/86 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 230 ms. Remains : 55/65 places, 68/86 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 159 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)), false]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-04 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) p1), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p0) p1 p2), acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) p1 p2), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 3}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (AND (GEQ s27 1) (GEQ s41 1)) (AND (GEQ s26 1) (GEQ s41 1)) (AND (GEQ s22 1) (GEQ s39 1)) (AND (GEQ s23 1) (GEQ s39 1)) (AND (GEQ s25 1) (GEQ s40 1...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null][true, true, true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 23074 reset in 508 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 23075 reset in 614 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (AND (NOT p0) p1)), (X (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2))), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1 p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 p2)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 6 factoid took 353 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 9 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 4 states, 9 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 156 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1), false]
Finished random walk after 26 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 4 properties in 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=8 )
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (AND (NOT p0) p1)), (X (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2))), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p1 p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 p2)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (F (AND p1 (NOT p0) p2)), (F p0), (F (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 6 factoid took 489 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 9 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 4 states, 9 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 177 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1), false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 157 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1), false]
[2024-05-31 17:28:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 17:28:34] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2024-05-31 17:28:34] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2024-05-31 17:28:34] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 43 ms returned sat
[2024-05-31 17:28:34] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 64/100/64 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 11 ms.
[2024-05-31 17:28:34] [INFO ] Added : 4 causal constraints over 1 iterations in 32 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))
Support contains 23 out of 55 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 55/55 places, 68/68 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 55 /55 variables (removed 0) and now considering 68/68 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-31 17:28:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 17:28:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 17:28:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 17:28:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 115 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 17:28:34] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 17:28:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 17:28:34] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 76 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 206 ms. Remains : 55/55 places, 68/68 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (X (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0) p2))), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p0) p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0) p2))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 6 factoid took 505 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 9 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 4 states, 9 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 309 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1), false]
Finished random walk after 16 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 4 properties in 12 ms. (steps per millisecond=1 )
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (X (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0) p2))), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (AND p1 (NOT p0) p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0) p2)))), (F (AND p2 (NOT p0) p1)), (F p0), (F (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) p1)), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 6 factoid took 667 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 9 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 4 states, 9 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 159 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1), false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 172 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1), false]
[2024-05-31 17:28:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 17:28:36] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2024-05-31 17:28:36] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2024-05-31 17:28:36] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 31 ms returned sat
[2024-05-31 17:28:36] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 64/100/64 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 6 ms.
[2024-05-31 17:28:36] [INFO ] Added : 4 causal constraints over 1 iterations in 21 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 177 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1), false]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 22318 reset in 341 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 22033 reset in 361 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin16126518619200509977
[2024-05-31 17:28:37] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 68 transitions.
[2024-05-31 17:28:37] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-31 17:28:37] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 68 transitions.
[2024-05-31 17:28:37] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-31 17:28:37] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 68 transitions.
[2024-05-31 17:28:37] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-31 17:28:37] [INFO ] Built C files in 11ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin16126518619200509977
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin16126518619200509977;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 227 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin16126518619200509977;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 28 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin16126518619200509977;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased9340114317396884772.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 106 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-04 finished in 6684 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 12 out of 65 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 86/86 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 65 transition count 82
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 61 transition count 80
Performed 22 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 22
Deduced a syphon composed of 22 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 39 transition count 58
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 39 transition count 52
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 38 transition count 44
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 37 transition count 44
Applied a total of 63 rules in 15 ms. Remains 37 /65 variables (removed 28) and now considering 44/86 (removed 42) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 37 cols
[2024-05-31 17:28:38] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-31 17:28:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 17:28:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 17:28:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 51 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 83 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 17:28:38] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 17:28:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 17:28:38] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 44 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 37/65 places, 44/86 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 157 ms. Remains : 37/65 places, 44/86 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 96 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-05 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (AND (GEQ s24 1) (GEQ s34 1)) (AND (GEQ s22 1) (GEQ s33 1)) (AND (GEQ s27 1) (GEQ s36 1)) (AND (GEQ s23 1) (GEQ s34 1)) (AND (GEQ s28 1) (GEQ s36 1...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null][true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 9178 reset in 178 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 2108 steps with 190 reset with depth 11 and stack size 11 in 6 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-05 finished in 464 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G((p0&&F(p1)))))'
Support contains 3 out of 65 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 86/86 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 63 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 63 transition count 84
Applied a total of 4 rules in 5 ms. Remains 63 /65 variables (removed 2) and now considering 84/86 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2024-05-31 17:28:38] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-31 17:28:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 87 ms returned [42]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 89 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/65 places, 84/86 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 62 /62 variables (removed 0) and now considering 84/84 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 97 ms. Remains : 62/65 places, 84/86 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 120 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), true, (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-08 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 3}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 3}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(GEQ s38 1), p1:(AND (GEQ s35 1) (GEQ s48 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-08 finished in 235 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(p0) U (p1||(F(p1) U p2))))'
Support contains 5 out of 65 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 86/86 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 65 transition count 82
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 61 transition count 80
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 61 transition count 73
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 54 transition count 73
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 42 transition count 61
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 42 transition count 56
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 41 transition count 55
Applied a total of 55 rules in 19 ms. Remains 41 /65 variables (removed 24) and now considering 55/86 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 55 rows 41 cols
[2024-05-31 17:28:38] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-31 17:28:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 17:28:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 17:28:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 138 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 191 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 17:28:38] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 17:28:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 17:28:39] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 78 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 41/65 places, 55/86 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 311 ms. Remains : 41/65 places, 55/86 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 222 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p1), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-09 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 1}, { cond=(NOT p2), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p0), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p0), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 4}]], initial=0, aps=[p1:(AND (GEQ s0 1) (GEQ s5 1) (GEQ s24 1)), p2:(GEQ s17 1), p0:(LT s3 1)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null][true, true, true, true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2177 reset in 254 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 104 steps with 3 reset with depth 40 and stack size 40 in 1 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-09 finished in 805 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(X(G(p0)))))'
Support contains 1 out of 65 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 86/86 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 63 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 63 transition count 84
Applied a total of 4 rules in 5 ms. Remains 63 /65 variables (removed 2) and now considering 84/86 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2024-05-31 17:28:39] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-31 17:28:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 78 ms returned [42]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 80 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/65 places, 84/86 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 62 /62 variables (removed 0) and now considering 84/84 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 90 ms. Remains : 62/65 places, 84/86 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 145 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-10 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 0}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 1}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 1}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=3 dest: 4}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=4 dest: 2}]], initial=3, aps=[p0:(LT s41 1)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, terminal, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 3 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-10 finished in 250 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)&&F(G(p1)))))'
Support contains 2 out of 65 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 86/86 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 65 transition count 83
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 62 transition count 82
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 62 transition count 75
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 55 transition count 75
Performed 21 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 21
Deduced a syphon composed of 21 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 34 transition count 54
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 34 transition count 49
Drop transitions removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 34 transition count 48
Applied a total of 69 rules in 19 ms. Remains 34 /65 variables (removed 31) and now considering 48/86 (removed 38) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 48 rows 34 cols
[2024-05-31 17:28:39] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-31 17:28:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned [25]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 62 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 33/65 places, 48/86 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 33 /33 variables (removed 0) and now considering 48/48 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 86 ms. Remains : 33/65 places, 48/86 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 108 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-11 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}], [{ cond=p1, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}, { cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(LT s21 1), p1:(GEQ s22 1)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null, null, null][true, true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 218 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 41 steps with 0 reset with depth 42 and stack size 42 in 0 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-11 finished in 428 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((p0||X(p0)||(p1 U G(p0)))))'
Support contains 3 out of 65 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 86/86 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 64 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 64 transition count 85
Applied a total of 2 rules in 6 ms. Remains 64 /65 variables (removed 1) and now considering 85/86 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 64 cols
[2024-05-31 17:28:40] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-31 17:28:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned [43]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 75 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/65 places, 85/86 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 63 /63 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 84 ms. Remains : 63/65 places, 85/86 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 221 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-12 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) p1), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) p1), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 5}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=4 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND p0 p1), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 5}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) p1), acceptance={0} source=5 dest: 5}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 6}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=6 dest: 4}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=6 dest: 6}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(GEQ s25 1), p1:(AND (GEQ s34 1) (GEQ s52 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-12 finished in 325 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F(!p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 65 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 86/86 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 63 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 63 transition count 84
Applied a total of 4 rules in 5 ms. Remains 63 /65 variables (removed 2) and now considering 84/86 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2024-05-31 17:28:40] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-31 17:28:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 79 ms returned [42]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 80 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/65 places, 84/86 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 62 /62 variables (removed 0) and now considering 84/84 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 89 ms. Remains : 62/65 places, 84/86 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 73 ms :[p0, p0]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-14 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=p0, acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(GEQ s38 1)], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null][false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 34713 reset in 176 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 34628 reset in 194 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 161 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 2 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 72 ms :[p0, p0]
Finished random walk after 3 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=3 )
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 174 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 2 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 103 ms :[p0, p0]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 82 ms :[p0, p0]
Support contains 1 out of 62 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 62/62 places, 84/84 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 62 /62 variables (removed 0) and now considering 84/84 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 62 cols
[2024-05-31 17:28:41] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-31 17:28:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 103 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 17:28:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 17:28:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 154 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 261 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 17:28:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 17:28:42] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 97 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 362 ms. Remains : 62/62 places, 84/84 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 150 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 2 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 98 ms :[p0, p0]
Finished random walk after 9 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=9 )
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 352 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 2 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 64 ms :[p0, p0]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 91 ms :[p0, p0]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 130 ms :[p0, p0]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 34574 reset in 104 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 34583 reset in 115 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [false, true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 130 ms :[p0, p0]
Support contains 1 out of 62 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 62/62 places, 84/84 transitions.
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 62 transition count 92
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 62 transition count 92
Performed 23 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -3
Deduced a syphon composed of 31 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 62 transition count 95
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 62 transition count 87
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 61 transition count 79
Deduced a syphon composed of 31 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 61 transition count 79
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 49 transition count 59
Deduced a syphon composed of 23 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 49 transition count 59
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 41 transition count 51
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 41 transition count 51
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 41 transition count 44
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 1 ms
Applied a total of 88 rules in 34 ms. Remains 41 /62 variables (removed 21) and now considering 44/84 (removed 40) transitions.
[2024-05-31 17:28:43] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 41 cols
[2024-05-31 17:28:43] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-31 17:28:43] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 67 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 41/62 places, 44/84 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 135 ms. Remains : 41/62 places, 44/84 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin13201528155309344079
[2024-05-31 17:28:43] [INFO ] Built C files in 2ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin13201528155309344079
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin13201528155309344079;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 217 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin13201528155309344079;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 40 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin13201528155309344079;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased11216998646535042900.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 118 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-14 finished in 3411 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(((p0 U p1) U p2)))'
Support contains 6 out of 65 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 86/86 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 63 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 63 transition count 84
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 63 /65 variables (removed 2) and now considering 84/86 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2024-05-31 17:28:43] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-31 17:28:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 17:28:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 17:28:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 89 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 143 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 17:28:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 17:28:44] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 91 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/65 places, 84/86 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 239 ms. Remains : 63/65 places, 84/86 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 133 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2), true, (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-15 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(OR (AND (NOT p2) p1) (AND (NOT p2) p0)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 3}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 3}]], initial=0, aps=[p2:(AND (GEQ s0 1) (GEQ s6 1) (GEQ s42 1)), p1:(AND (GEQ s1 1) (GEQ s7 1) (GEQ s42 1)), p0:(GEQ s19 1)], nbAcceptance=0, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-LTLFireability-15 finished in 387 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 28382 ms.

BK_STOP 1717176525439

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202304061127.jar
+ VERSION=202304061127
+ echo 'Running Version 202304061127'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="gold2023"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool gold2023"
echo " Input is UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r461-smll-171701122900118"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04.tgz
mv UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;