About the Execution of 2023-gold for UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
770.915 | 26064.00 | 50622.00 | 712.10 | FFFFFFFTFFFTFFTF | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r461-smll-171701122600008.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool gold2023
Input is UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r461-smll-171701122600008
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 572K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.5K Apr 13 05:08 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 90K Apr 13 05:08 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K Apr 13 05:05 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 54K Apr 13 05:05 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K Apr 23 08:03 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K Apr 23 08:03 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.8K Apr 23 08:03 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K Apr 23 08:03 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K Apr 13 05:16 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 138K Apr 13 05:16 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Apr 13 05:13 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 123K Apr 13 05:13 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.9K Apr 23 08:03 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.0K Apr 23 08:03 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K May 18 16:43 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1717171439091
bash -c /home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n "BK_STOP " ; date -u +%s%3N
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=gold2023
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04
Not applying reductions.
Model is COL
LTLFireability COL
Running Version 202304061127
[2024-05-31 16:04:02] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-31 16:04:02] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-31 16:04:02] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2024-05-31 16:04:03] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2024-05-31 16:04:03] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 1028 ms
[2024-05-31 16:04:03] [INFO ] Imported 13 HL places and 12 HL transitions for a total of 72 PT places and 108.0 transition bindings in 32 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 24 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
[2024-05-31 16:04:04] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 13 places and 12 transitions 37 arcs in 8 ms.
[2024-05-31 16:04:04] [INFO ] Skeletonized 16 HLPN properties in 3 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Remains 11 properties that can be checked using skeleton over-approximation.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 1 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Finished random walk after 82 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 9 properties in 19 ms. (steps per millisecond=4 )
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
[2024-05-31 16:04:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2024-05-31 16:04:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Transition timeout forces synchronizations/join behavior on parameter c of sort Cli
Domain [Cli(4), Z(2), Z(2)] of place MovetoZ breaks symmetries in sort Z
[2024-05-31 16:04:04] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 72 places and 108 transitions 340 arcs in 24 ms.
[2024-05-31 16:04:04] [INFO ] Unfolded 14 HLPN properties in 0 ms.
[2024-05-31 16:04:04] [INFO ] Reduced 4 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-31 16:04:04] [INFO ] Reduced 4 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-31 16:04:04] [INFO ] Reduced 4 identical enabling conditions.
Ensure Unique test removed 16 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 16 transitions.
Support contains 55 out of 72 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 16 ms. Remains 72 /72 variables (removed 0) and now considering 92/92 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 72 cols
[2024-05-31 16:04:04] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 14 ms
[2024-05-31 16:04:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 286 ms returned [51]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 295 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 71/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 71 /71 variables (removed 0) and now considering 92/92 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 316 ms. Remains : 71/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Support contains 55 out of 71 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-31 16:04:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 69 ms
[2024-05-31 16:04:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2024-05-31 16:04:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
Finished random walk after 23 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 18 properties in 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=3 )
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((G(!p0) U X(p1))))'
Support contains 16 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 63 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 63 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 7 ms. Remains 63 /71 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2024-05-31 16:04:05] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 7 ms
[2024-05-31 16:04:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 16:04:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 16:04:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 112 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 197 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 16:04:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 16:04:05] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 117 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/71 places, 84/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 323 ms. Remains : 63/71 places, 84/92 transitions.
ANTLR Tool version 4.9.3 used for code generation does not match the current runtime version 4.7.2ANTLR Runtime version 4.9.3 used for parser compilation does not match the current runtime version 4.7.2ANTLR Tool version 4.9.3 used for code generation does not match the current runtime version 4.7.2ANTLR Runtime version 4.9.3 used for parser compilation does not match the current runtime version 4.7.2Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 381 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), true, p0]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-00 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 4}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 3}], [{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=4 dest: 3}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 4}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (AND (GEQ s33 1) (GEQ s52 1)) (AND (GEQ s31 1) (GEQ s51 1)) (AND (GEQ s36 1) (GEQ s54 1)) (AND (GEQ s32 1) (GEQ s52 1)) (AND (GEQ s37 1) (GEQ s54 1...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 116 steps with 40 reset in 8 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-00 finished in 787 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)&&F(G(p1)))))'
Support contains 15 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 92/92 transitions.
Performed 16 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 71 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 55 transition count 68
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 55 transition count 60
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 47 transition count 60
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 43 transition count 56
Applied a total of 64 rules in 28 ms. Remains 43 /71 variables (removed 28) and now considering 56/92 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 43 cols
[2024-05-31 16:04:06] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-31 16:04:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 16:04:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 16:04:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 124 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 189 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 16:04:06] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 16:04:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 16:04:06] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 97 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 43/71 places, 56/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 327 ms. Remains : 43/71 places, 56/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 170 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-01 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}], [{ cond=p1, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}, { cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={0} source=2 dest: 2}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (GEQ s24 1) (GEQ s23 1) (GEQ s26 1) (GEQ s25 1)), p1:(AND (OR (AND (GEQ s0 1) (GEQ s3 1) (GEQ s22 1)) (AND (GEQ s1 1) (GEQ s5 1) (GEQ s22 1)) (AND ...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null, null, null][true, true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1 reset in 738 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 222 steps with 1 reset with depth 209 and stack size 209 in 3 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-01 finished in 1262 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G(p0)))'
Support contains 11 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 63 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 63 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 6 ms. Remains 63 /71 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2024-05-31 16:04:07] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-31 16:04:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 81 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 16:04:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 16:04:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 124 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 208 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 16:04:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 16:04:07] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 174 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/71 places, 84/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 389 ms. Remains : 63/71 places, 84/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 119 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-02 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 0}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}]], initial=1, aps=[p0:(AND (OR (AND (GEQ s1 1) (GEQ s9 1) (GEQ s42 1)) (AND (GEQ s0 1) (GEQ s6 1) (GEQ s42 1)) (AND (GEQ s1 1) (GEQ s13 1) (GEQ s42 1)) (AND (GEQ s1 1) (GEQ ...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, terminal, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null][false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-02 finished in 532 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((((p1 U p2)||X(G(p3))||p0) U (p3&&((p1 U p2)||X(G(p3))||p4)))))'
Support contains 27 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 63 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 63 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 4 ms. Remains 63 /71 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
[2024-05-31 16:04:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 16:04:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 16:04:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 16:04:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 96 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 144 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 16:04:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 16:04:08] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 119 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/71 places, 84/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 274 ms. Remains : 63/71 places, 84/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 605 ms :[(NOT p3), (NOT p3), (NOT p3), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (NOT p3), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), true, (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3))]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-03 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p3), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(OR (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)) (AND (NOT p4) (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0))), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}, { cond=(OR (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p0)) (AND (NOT p4) (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p0))), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND p3 (NOT p4) (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND p3 (NOT p4) (NOT p2) p1 p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 5}], [{ cond=p3, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}, { cond=(NOT p3), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 6}], [{ cond=(AND p3 (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND p3 (NOT p2) p1), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 6}, { cond=(AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2) p1), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 7}], [{ cond=(NOT p3), acceptance={0} source=4 dest: 1}, { cond=(OR (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)) (AND (NOT p4) (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0))), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 2}, { cond=(OR (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p0)) (AND (NOT p4) (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p0))), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND p3 (NOT p4) (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND p3 (NOT p4) (NOT p2) p1 p0), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 5}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=5 dest: 1}, { cond=(OR (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)) (AND (NOT p4) (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0))), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 2}, { cond=(OR (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p0)) (AND (NOT p4) (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p0))), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND p3 (NOT p4) (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND p3 (NOT p4) (NOT p2) p1 p0), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 5}, { cond=(AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2) p1), acceptance={0} source=5 dest: 8}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=6 dest: 6}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=7 dest: 6}, { cond=(AND (NOT p2) p1), acceptance={0} source=7 dest: 7}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), acceptance={0} source=8 dest: 1}, { cond=(OR (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)) (AND (NOT p4) (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0))), acceptance={} source=8 dest: 2}, { cond=(OR (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p0)) (AND (NOT p4) (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p0))), acceptance={} source=8 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND p3 (NOT p4) (NOT p2) (NOT p1) p0), acceptance={0} source=8 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND p3 (NOT p4) (NOT p2) p1 p0), acceptance={0} source=8 dest: 5}, { cond=(AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2) p1), acceptance={0} source=8 dest: 8}]], initial=0, aps=[p3:(OR (GEQ s44 1) (GEQ s43 1) (GEQ s46 1) (GEQ s45 1)), p2:(OR (GEQ s48 1) (GEQ s47 1) (GEQ s50 1) (GEQ s49 1)), p1:(OR (AND (GEQ s35 1) (GEQ s49 1)) (AN...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-sensitive], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 23 steps with 1 reset in 2 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-03 finished in 928 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G((p0||X(X(G(p1)))))))'
Support contains 11 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 63 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 63 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 6 ms. Remains 63 /71 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
[2024-05-31 16:04:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 16:04:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 16:04:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 16:04:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 111 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 172 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 16:04:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 16:04:09] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 155 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/71 places, 84/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 336 ms. Remains : 63/71 places, 84/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 228 ms :[true, (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-04 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 4}], [{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=2 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 1}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=3 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=4 dest: 0}, { cond=p1, acceptance={} source=4 dest: 4}]], initial=2, aps=[p0:(AND (OR (LT s0 1) (LT s7 1) (LT s42 1)) (OR (LT s1 1) (LT s9 1) (LT s42 1)) (OR (LT s1 1) (LT s11 1) (LT s42 1)) (OR (LT s1 1) (LT s6 1) (LT s42 1)) (...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, terminal, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null][false, false, false, false, false]]
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 7 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-04 finished in 588 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(F(p0)) U G((X(F((p2&&F(p3))))||p1))))'
Support contains 20 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 92/92 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 16 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 16 transitions
Performed 16 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 71 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 55 transition count 68
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 54 transition count 60
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 54 transition count 60
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 50 transition count 56
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 50 transition count 56
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 42 transition count 48
Applied a total of 66 rules in 18 ms. Remains 42 /71 variables (removed 29) and now considering 48/92 (removed 44) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 48 rows 42 cols
[2024-05-31 16:04:09] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-31 16:04:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 16:04:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 16:04:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 124 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 16:04:09] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 16:04:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 16:04:09] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 75 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 42/71 places, 48/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 227 ms. Remains : 42/71 places, 48/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 418 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3) p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-05 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}, { cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 2}, { cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 3}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p3)), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND p1 (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND p1 (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p3)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND p1 p2 (NOT p3)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 5}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 1}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 2}, { cond=(AND p1 (NOT p2)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), acceptance={0} source=3 dest: 3}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p3)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p3)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 5}, { cond=(AND p2 (NOT p3)), acceptance={} source=3 dest: 6}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)), acceptance={0} source=4 dest: 4}], [{ cond=(AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p3)), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND p1 (NOT p3)), acceptance={} source=5 dest: 5}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p3)), acceptance={} source=6 dest: 4}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), acceptance={} source=6 dest: 5}, { cond=(AND p1 (NOT p3)), acceptance={} source=6 dest: 6}, { cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), acceptance={0} source=6 dest: 6}]], initial=0, aps=[p1:(OR (GEQ s35 1) (GEQ s34 1) (GEQ s37 1) (GEQ s36 1)), p0:(OR (AND (GEQ s24 1) (GEQ s39 1)) (AND (GEQ s22 1) (GEQ s38 1)) (AND (GEQ s27 1) (GEQ s41 1)) ...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null, null, null, null, null, null, null][true, true, true, true, true, true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 7733 reset in 462 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 10282 steps with 809 reset with depth 11 and stack size 11 in 56 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-05 finished in 1209 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(G(p0))||G(!p0)))'
Support contains 12 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 92/92 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 16 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 16 transitions
Performed 16 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 71 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 55 transition count 68
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 54 transition count 60
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 54 transition count 60
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 50 transition count 56
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 50 transition count 56
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 37 transition count 44
Applied a total of 75 rules in 19 ms. Remains 37 /71 variables (removed 34) and now considering 44/92 (removed 48) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 37 cols
[2024-05-31 16:04:10] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-31 16:04:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 16:04:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 16:04:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 138 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 16:04:11] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 16:04:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 16:04:11] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 72 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 37/71 places, 44/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 241 ms. Remains : 37/71 places, 44/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 91 ms :[false, (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-06 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=p0, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 1}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (AND (GEQ s26 1) (GEQ s31 1)) (AND (GEQ s25 1) (GEQ s31 1)) (AND (GEQ s21 1) (GEQ s29 1)) (AND (GEQ s22 1) (GEQ s29 1)) (AND (GEQ s27 1) (GEQ s32 1...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null, null][true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 204 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 41 steps with 0 reset with depth 42 and stack size 42 in 1 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-06 finished in 558 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(p0))'
Support contains 4 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 92/92 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 16 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 16 transitions
Performed 16 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 71 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 55 transition count 68
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 55 transition count 60
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 47 transition count 60
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 46 transition count 52
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 46 transition count 52
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 42 transition count 48
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 42 transition count 48
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 38 transition count 40
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 38 transition count 40
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 34 transition count 36
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 34 transition count 36
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 34 transition count 32
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 34 transition count 28
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 30 transition count 28
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 21 transition count 20
Applied a total of 111 rules in 18 ms. Remains 21 /71 variables (removed 50) and now considering 20/92 (removed 72) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 20 rows 21 cols
[2024-05-31 16:04:11] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-31 16:04:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 16:04:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 16:04:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 41 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 76 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 16:04:11] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 16:04:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 16:04:11] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 40 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 21/71 places, 20/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 142 ms. Remains : 21/71 places, 20/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 36 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-07 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (GEQ s14 1) (GEQ s13 1) (GEQ s16 1) (GEQ s15 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, colored, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 101 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 124 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p0))]
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 15 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-07 finished in 435 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((!p0&&X(p0))))'
Support contains 11 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 92/92 transitions.
Performed 16 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 71 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 55 transition count 68
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 55 transition count 60
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 47 transition count 60
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 43 transition count 56
Applied a total of 64 rules in 11 ms. Remains 43 /71 variables (removed 28) and now considering 56/92 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 43 cols
[2024-05-31 16:04:11] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-31 16:04:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 16:04:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 16:04:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 63 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 109 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 16:04:11] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 16:04:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 16:04:12] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 64 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 43/71 places, 56/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 192 ms. Remains : 43/71 places, 56/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 80 ms :[true, (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-08 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=p0, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(AND (OR (LT s0 1) (LT s3 1) (LT s22 1)) (OR (LT s1 1) (LT s5 1) (LT s22 1)) (OR (LT s1 1) (LT s7 1) (LT s22 1)) (OR (LT s1 1) (LT s2 1) (LT s22 1)) (O...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, colored, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null][true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 12520 reset in 478 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 11431 steps with 1433 reset with depth 13 and stack size 13 in 54 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-08 finished in 824 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(p0)||X(F(p1))))'
Support contains 15 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 63 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 63 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 4 ms. Remains 63 /71 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 63 cols
[2024-05-31 16:04:12] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-31 16:04:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 16:04:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 16:04:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 89 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 142 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 16:04:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 16:04:12] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 102 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/71 places, 84/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 251 ms. Remains : 63/71 places, 84/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 129 ms :[(NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-11 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p1), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}], [{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=1 dest: 0}, { cond=p0, acceptance={} source=1 dest: 2}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=2 dest: 2}]], initial=1, aps=[p1:(AND (OR (LT s0 1) (LT s7 1) (LT s42 1)) (OR (LT s1 1) (LT s9 1) (LT s42 1)) (OR (LT s1 1) (LT s11 1) (LT s42 1)) (OR (LT s1 1) (LT s6 1) (LT s42 1)) (...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null, null][false, false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 276 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 314 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X p1))]
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 21 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 5 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-11 finished in 1016 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(F((X(p1)&&!(X(p2) U !p1)&&p0)))||F(p2)))'
Support contains 20 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 92/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 71 /71 variables (removed 0) and now considering 92/92 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 71 cols
[2024-05-31 16:04:13] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-31 16:04:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 16:04:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 16:04:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 118 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 184 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 16:04:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 16:04:13] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 95 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 285 ms. Remains : 71/71 places, 92/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 107 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-12 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND p1 (NOT p2) p0), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p1:(AND (LT s2 1) (LT s3 1) (LT s4 1) (LT s5 1)), p2:(OR (GEQ s32 1) (GEQ s33 1) (GEQ s34 1) (GEQ s35 1) (GEQ s36 1) (GEQ s37 1) (GEQ s22 1) (GEQ s23 1) (...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, colored, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-sensitive, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null][false, false]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 12503 reset in 238 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 26957 steps with 3342 reset with depth 8 and stack size 8 in 56 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-12 finished in 711 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(!p0)))'
Support contains 4 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 92/92 transitions.
Drop transitions removed 16 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 16 transitions
Performed 16 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 71 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 55 transition count 68
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 55 transition count 60
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 47 transition count 60
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 46 transition count 52
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 46 transition count 52
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 42 transition count 48
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 42 transition count 48
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 38 transition count 40
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 38 transition count 40
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 34 transition count 36
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 34 transition count 36
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 34 transition count 32
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 34 transition count 28
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 30 transition count 28
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 26 transition count 24
Applied a total of 102 rules in 13 ms. Remains 26 /71 variables (removed 45) and now considering 24/92 (removed 68) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 24 rows 26 cols
[2024-05-31 16:04:14] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-31 16:04:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 16:04:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 16:04:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 40 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 78 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 16:04:14] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 16:04:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 16:04:14] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 32 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 26/71 places, 24/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 129 ms. Remains : 26/71 places, 24/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 36 ms :[p0]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-13 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(NOT p0), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=p0, acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(OR (GEQ s11 1) (GEQ s10 1) (GEQ s13 1) (GEQ s12 1))], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 137 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 35 steps with 0 reset with depth 36 and stack size 36 in 0 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-13 finished in 318 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(!p0)||G((p1||X(F(!p0)))))))'
Support contains 15 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 92/92 transitions.
Performed 16 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 71 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 55 transition count 68
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 55 transition count 60
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 47 transition count 60
Applied a total of 56 rules in 12 ms. Remains 47 /71 variables (removed 24) and now considering 60/92 (removed 32) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 47 cols
[2024-05-31 16:04:14] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-31 16:04:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 16:04:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 16:04:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 92 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 143 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 16:04:14] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 16:04:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 16:04:14] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 75 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 47/71 places, 60/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 241 ms. Remains : 47/71 places, 60/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 103 ms :[(AND p0 (NOT p1)), p0]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-14 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=true, acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 1}], [{ cond=p0, acceptance={0} source=1 dest: 1}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(AND (OR (LT s0 1) (LT s7 1) (LT s26 1)) (OR (LT s1 1) (LT s9 1) (LT s26 1)) (OR (LT s1 1) (LT s11 1) (LT s26 1)) (OR (LT s1 1) (LT s6 1) (LT s26 1)) (...], nbAcceptance=1, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, no-univ-branch, stutter-invariant, very-weak, weak, inherently-weak], stateDesc=[null, null][true, true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 17985 reset in 421 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 18087 reset in 326 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 117 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 67 ms :[(AND p0 (NOT p1)), p0]
Finished random walk after 4 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 2 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=2 )
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 165 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 102 ms :[(AND p0 (NOT p1)), p0]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 99 ms :[(AND p0 (NOT p1)), p0]
[2024-05-31 16:04:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 16:04:16] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2024-05-31 16:04:16] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2024-05-31 16:04:16] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 50 ms returned sat
[2024-05-31 16:04:16] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 56/100/56 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 10 ms.
[2024-05-31 16:04:16] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-05-31 16:04:16] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2024-05-31 16:04:16] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2024-05-31 16:04:16] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 52 ms returned sat
[2024-05-31 16:04:16] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 56/100/56 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 9 ms.
[2024-05-31 16:04:17] [INFO ] Added : 56 causal constraints over 12 iterations in 191 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND p0 (NOT p1))
Support contains 15 out of 47 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 47/47 places, 60/60 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 47 /47 variables (removed 0) and now considering 60/60 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-31 16:04:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 16:04:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 16:04:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 16:04:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 56 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 98 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 16:04:17] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 16:04:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 16:04:17] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 67 ms found 0 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 176 ms. Remains : 47/47 places, 60/60 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 114 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 66 ms :[(AND p0 (NOT p1)), p0]
Finished random walk after 3 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 2 properties in 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=1 )
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (X p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 277 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 101 ms :[(AND p0 (NOT p1)), p0]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 100 ms :[(AND p0 (NOT p1)), p0]
[2024-05-31 16:04:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 16:04:18] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2024-05-31 16:04:18] [INFO ] [Real]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2024-05-31 16:04:18] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 49 ms returned sat
[2024-05-31 16:04:18] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 56/100/56 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 9 ms.
[2024-05-31 16:04:18] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-05-31 16:04:18] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2024-05-31 16:04:18] [INFO ] [Nat]Adding state equation constraints to refine reachable states.
[2024-05-31 16:04:18] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 44 ms returned sat
[2024-05-31 16:04:18] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 56/100/56 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 9 ms.
[2024-05-31 16:04:18] [INFO ] Added : 56 causal constraints over 12 iterations in 146 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND p0 (NOT p1))
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 80 ms :[(AND p0 (NOT p1)), p0]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 17771 reset in 297 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 17787 reset in 255 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin4253345407553283525
[2024-05-31 16:04:19] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 60 transitions.
[2024-05-31 16:04:19] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-31 16:04:19] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 60 transitions.
[2024-05-31 16:04:19] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-31 16:04:19] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 60 transitions.
[2024-05-31 16:04:19] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-31 16:04:19] [INFO ] Built C files in 21ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin4253345407553283525
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin4253345407553283525;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 374 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin4253345407553283525;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 43 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin4253345407553283525;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased15463856228238884881.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 2833 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-14 finished in 7863 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202304061127/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((G(p0)||G(p1))))'
Support contains 15 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 92/92 transitions.
Performed 16 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 71 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 55 transition count 68
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 55 transition count 60
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 47 transition count 60
Applied a total of 56 rules in 7 ms. Remains 47 /71 variables (removed 24) and now considering 60/92 (removed 32) transitions.
[2024-05-31 16:04:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 16:04:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 16:04:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 16:04:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 63 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 99 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 16:04:22] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 16:04:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 16:04:22] [INFO ] Dead Transitions using invariants and state equation in 95 ms found 0 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 47/71 places, 60/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 211 ms. Remains : 47/71 places, 60/92 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 49 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-15 automaton TGBA Formula[mat=[[{ cond=(AND p0 p1), acceptance={} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) p1), acceptance={0} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND p0 (NOT p1)), acceptance={1} source=0 dest: 0}, { cond=(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), acceptance={0, 1} source=0 dest: 0}]], initial=0, aps=[p0:(AND (OR (LT s0 1) (LT s7 1) (LT s26 1)) (OR (LT s1 1) (LT s9 1) (LT s26 1)) (OR (LT s1 1) (LT s11 1) (LT s26 1)) (OR (LT s1 1) (LT s6 1) (LT s26 1)) (...], nbAcceptance=2, properties=[trans-labels, explicit-labels, trans-acc, complete, deterministic, no-univ-branch, unambiguous, semi-deterministic, stutter-invariant], stateDesc=[null][true]]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 794 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 175 steps with 0 reset with depth 176 and stack size 176 in 2 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-LTLFireability-15 finished in 1072 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 21113 ms.
BK_STOP 1717171465155
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202304061127.jar
+ VERSION=202304061127
+ echo 'Running Version 202304061127'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="gold2023"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool gold2023"
echo " Input is UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r461-smll-171701122600008"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04.tgz
mv UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;