fond
Model Checking Contest 2024
14th edition, Geneva, Switzerland, June 25, 2024
Execution of r444-smll-171701111100250
Last Updated
July 7, 2024

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N04

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
2825.939 700037.00 762418.00 2583.90 TFFTTTTFFFTFTTFF normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r444-smll-171701111100250.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N04, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r444-smll-171701111100250
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 1.7M
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K Apr 13 05:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 153K Apr 13 05:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 52K Apr 13 05:19 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 220K Apr 13 05:19 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K Apr 23 08:04 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 55K Apr 23 08:04 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K Apr 23 08:04 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 46K Apr 23 08:04 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 59K Apr 13 05:32 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 321K Apr 13 05:32 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 103K Apr 13 05:29 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 406K Apr 13 05:29 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 23 08:04 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.3K Apr 23 08:04 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 128K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-12
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-13
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-14
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1717123413917

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N04
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-31 02:43:36] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-31 02:43:36] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-31 02:43:36] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 290 ms
[2024-05-31 02:43:37] [INFO ] Transformed 154 places.
[2024-05-31 02:43:37] [INFO ] Transformed 300 transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:43:37] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 154 places and 300 transitions and 964 arcs in 537 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 63 ms.
[2024-05-31 02:43:37] [INFO ] Reduced 12 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-31 02:43:37] [INFO ] Reduced 12 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-31 02:43:37] [INFO ] Reduced 12 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-31 02:43:37] [INFO ] Reduced 12 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-31 02:43:37] [INFO ] Reduced 12 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-31 02:43:37] [INFO ] Reduced 12 identical enabling conditions.
Ensure Unique test removed 64 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 64 transitions.
Support contains 154 out of 154 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 23 ms. Remains 154 /154 variables (removed 0) and now considering 236/236 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 236 rows 154 cols
[2024-05-31 02:43:37] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 90 ms
[2024-05-31 02:43:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 552 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 02:43:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 02:43:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 389 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1055 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 232 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:43:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/154 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 236/390 variables, 154/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/390 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 390/390 variables, and 165 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved in 12683 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 232/232 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/154 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 236/390 variables, 154/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 232/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 0/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/390 variables, 0/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 390/390 variables, and 397 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved in 13830 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 232/232 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 27098ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 27143ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 28281 ms. Remains : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Support contains 154 out of 154 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-31 02:44:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 75 ms
[2024-05-31 02:44:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 56 ms
[2024-05-31 02:44:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 236 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 80 to 79
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 3587 ms. (11 steps per ms) remains 2/79 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 1403 ms. (28 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 82 ms. (481 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
[2024-05-31 02:44:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Problem AtomicPropp21 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp79 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 145/390 variables, and 6 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved in 68 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/11 constraints, State Equation: 0/154 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 207ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-31 02:44:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2024-05-31 02:44:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2024-05-31 02:44:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 236 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 154 /154 variables (removed 0) and now considering 236/236 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:44:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 02:44:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 83 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 02:44:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 02:44:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 163 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 248 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 232 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:44:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/154 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 236/390 variables, 154/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/390 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 390/390 variables, and 165 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved in 11852 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 232/232 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/154 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 236/390 variables, 154/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 232/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 0/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/390 variables, 0/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 390/390 variables, and 397 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved in 15929 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 232/232 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 27953ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 27964ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 28218 ms. Remains : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:44:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-31 02:44:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-05-31 02:44:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 236 transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:44:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-05-31 02:44:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2024-05-31 02:44:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability889819127310233705.gal : 14 ms
[2024-05-31 02:44:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15679073253945594560.ctl : 9 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability889819127310233705.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15679073253945594560.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.55852e+07,4.21128,100164,2,12032,5,440339,6,0,855,338705,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(AX((A(((((Finished_2>=1)||(Finished_3>=1))||((Finished_0>=1)||(Finished_1>=1)))&&(((((((((IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(OpenRequests_1_1>=1))&&(I...17538
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY((Init * !(EG(!(EX(!((!((E(!(((((((((MovetoZ_1_2_0>=1)||(MovetoZ_1_2_2>=1))||((MovetoZ_1_3_0>=1)||(MovetoZ_...40840
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 120/156/116
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-31 02:45:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-31 02:45:06] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-31 02:45:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8619037644107602416.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8619037644107602416.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8619037644107602416.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8619037644107602416.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8619037644107602416.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-31 02:45:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-31 02:45:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-31 02:45:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 211 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:45:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 83 ms
[2024-05-31 02:45:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 102 labels/synchronizations in 15 ms.
[2024-05-31 02:45:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7142342065846937729.gal : 6 ms
[2024-05-31 02:45:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability57716888239556267.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7142342065846937729.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability57716888239556267.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...260
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.55852e+07,3.58145,106812,3843,1293,158460,7375,439,378739,114,475022,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(AX((A(((((u20.Finished_2>=1)||(u20.Finished_3>=1))||((u20.Finished_0>=1)||(u20.Finished_1>=1)))&&(((((((((u20.IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(i4.u4...22962
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY((Init * !(EG(!(EX(!((!((E(!(((((((((i7.u3.MovetoZ_1_2_0>=1)||(i11.u5.MovetoZ_1_2_2>=1))||((i7.u3.MovetoZ_1...53164
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 154 /154 variables (removed 0) and now considering 236/236 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:45:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 02:45:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 89 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 02:45:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 02:45:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 218 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 309 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 232 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:45:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/154 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 236/390 variables, 154/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/390 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 390/390 variables, and 165 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved in 11041 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 232/232 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/154 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 236/390 variables, 154/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 232/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 0/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/390 variables, 0/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 390/390 variables, and 397 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved in 15160 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 232/232 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 26492ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 26497ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 26810 ms. Remains : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-31 02:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-31 02:46:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 236 transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-31 02:46:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2024-05-31 02:46:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15620320573903209215.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-31 02:46:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1257304538290513015.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15620320573903209215.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1257304538290513015.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.55852e+07,4.31226,100032,2,12032,5,440339,6,0,855,338705,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(!((!(AF((((((((StartSecuring_0_2>=1)&&(ClientsWaiting_0>=1))||((StartSecuring_3_0>=1)&&(ClientsWaiting_3>=1)))||(((StartSecuring_1_3>=...11924
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(Init,!(EG(((((ControlRoomDispatch_2>=1)||(ControlRoomDispatch_3>=1))||((ControlRoomDispatch_0>=1)||(Co...23246
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 164/495/72
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-31 02:46:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-31 02:46:34] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-31 02:46:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph810276592729813643.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph810276592729813643.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph810276592729813643.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph810276592729813643.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph810276592729813643.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-31 02:46:34] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-31 02:46:34] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-31 02:46:34] [INFO ] Removed a total of 208 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:46:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2024-05-31 02:46:34] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 107 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2024-05-31 02:46:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3632808166124628669.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-31 02:46:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7057733071225020302.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3632808166124628669.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7057733071225020302.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.55852e+07,2.95905,87352,3790,1035,127984,6417,493,313946,119,404181,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(!((!(AF((((((((i4.i1.u29.StartSecuring_0_2>=1)&&(i4.i1.u24.ClientsWaiting_0>=1))||((i10.u33.StartSecuring_3_0>=1)&&(i10.u27.ClientsWai...15769
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(Init,!(EG(((((i7.i1.u6.ControlRoomDispatch_2>=1)||(i10.u10.ControlRoomDispatch_3>=1))||((i0.u1.Control...30527
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Performed 64 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 64
Iterating post reduction 0 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 154 transition count 172
Reduce places removed 64 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 16 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 16 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 80 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 90 transition count 156
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 90 transition count 140
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 176 place count 74 transition count 140
Applied a total of 176 rules in 46 ms. Remains 74 /154 variables (removed 80) and now considering 140/236 (removed 96) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 140 rows 74 cols
[2024-05-31 02:47:04] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-31 02:47:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 75 ms returned [45]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 78 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 73/154 places, 140/236 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 140/140 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 132 ms. Remains : 73/154 places, 140/236 transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:47:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-31 02:47:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-31 02:47:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 140 transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:47:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-31 02:47:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-31 02:47:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14444745764316432038.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-31 02:47:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12609251262631168133.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14444745764316432038.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12609251262631168133.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.98131e+06,0.088689,5636,2,841,5,11270,6,0,435,8845,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EG(AF(((((Finished_2>=1)||(Finished_3>=1))||((Finished_0>=1)||(Finished_1>=1)))&&(((ControlRoomDispatch_2>=1)||(ControlRoomDispatch_3>=...1171
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,EG(!(EG(!(((((Finished_2>=1)||(Finished_3>=1))||((Finished_0>=1)||(Finished_1>=1)))&&(((ControlR...1221
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 40/160/100
(forward)formula 0,0,0.571608,18380,1,0,10,91564,37,3,2502,50297,14
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 154 /154 variables (removed 0) and now considering 236/236 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 236 rows 154 cols
[2024-05-31 02:47:05] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 8 ms
[2024-05-31 02:47:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 02:47:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 02:47:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 141 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 200 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 232 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:47:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/154 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 236/390 variables, 154/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/390 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 390/390 variables, and 165 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved in 8231 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 232/232 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/154 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 236/390 variables, 154/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 232/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 0/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/390 variables, 0/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 390/390 variables, and 397 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved in 15313 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 232/232 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 23720ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 23723ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 23926 ms. Remains : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:47:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-31 02:47:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-31 02:47:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 236 transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:47:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-31 02:47:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2024-05-31 02:47:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17554591475747297586.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-31 02:47:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7830547856274710215.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17554591475747297586.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7830547856274710215.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.55852e+07,3.95776,100024,2,12032,5,440339,6,0,855,338705,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(EX((((((Clients_0>=1)||(Clients_1>=1))||((Clients_2>=1)||(Clients_3>=1))) * ((((((EG((((((((MovetoZ_1_2_0>=1)||(MovetoZ_1_2_2>=1))||((...16396
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(!((E(!(EG(!(((E(TRUE U (((((((StartSecuring_0_2>=1)&&(ClientsWaiting_0>=1))||((StartSecuring_3_...25031
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 164/555/72
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-31 02:47:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-31 02:47:59] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-31 02:47:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14572163032386553612.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14572163032386553612.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14572163032386553612.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14572163032386553612.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14572163032386553612.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-31 02:47:59] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-31 02:47:59] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-31 02:47:59] [INFO ] Removed a total of 208 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:47:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2024-05-31 02:47:59] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 112 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2024-05-31 02:47:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16923001896849504346.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-31 02:47:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6629358293470078274.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16923001896849504346.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6629358293470078274.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.55852e+07,3.69235,95864,4337,1296,157723,6512,501,266818,117,304901,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(EX((((((u22.Clients_0>=1)||(u22.Clients_1>=1))||((u22.Clients_2>=1)||(u22.Clients_3>=1))) * ((((((EG((((((((i6.i0.u3.MovetoZ_1_2_0>=1)...22023
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(!((E(!(EG(!(((E(TRUE U (((((((i7.i1.u27.StartSecuring_0_2>=1)&&(i7.i0.u23.ClientsWaiting_0>=1))...33582
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 154 /154 variables (removed 0) and now considering 236/236 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:48:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 02:48:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned [125]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 73 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 153/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 153 /153 variables (removed 0) and now considering 236/236 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 78 ms. Remains : 153/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:48:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-31 02:48:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-31 02:48:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 236 transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:48:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-31 02:48:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-31 02:48:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7336548845234514714.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-31 02:48:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5648572589773071647.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7336548845234514714.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5648572589773071647.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.55852e+07,3.25972,77940,2,8559,5,339954,6,0,851,261903,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(!(A(EF((((((((((IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(OpenRequests_1_1>=1))&&(Idles>=1))||(((IdleTechs_2>=1)&&(OpenRequests_2_0>=1))&&(Idles>=1)))||((((I...10687
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((Init * E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(!(!(EG(!((((Clients_0>=1)||(Clients_1>=1))||((Clients_2>=1)||(Clients_3>=1))))))...15058
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,20.3263,433988,1,0,10,2.83531e+06,26,2,4503,1.12814e+06,13
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 154 /154 variables (removed 0) and now considering 236/236 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:48:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 02:48:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 146 ms returned [124, 125]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 148 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 152/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 152 /152 variables (removed 0) and now considering 236/236 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 158 ms. Remains : 152/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:48:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-31 02:48:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-31 02:48:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 236 transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:48:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-31 02:48:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-31 02:48:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3682028374167957525.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-31 02:48:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15837376405229372307.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3682028374167957525.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15837376405229372307.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.55852e+07,1.08138,28680,2,3731,5,118068,6,0,847,102083,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EG((AF((((((Assigned_2_0<1)&&(Assigned_2_1<1))&&((Assigned_2_2<1)&&(Assigned_2_3<1)))&&(((Assigned_3_0<1)&&(Assigned_3_1<1))&&((Assig...2398
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(!(EG(!((((((Assigned_2_0<1)&&(Assigned_2_1<1))&&((Assigned_2_2<1)&&(Assigned_2_3<1)))&&(...2753
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,18.1268,450072,1,0,13,2.09151e+06,25,6,3842,2.80778e+06,12
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 154 /154 variables (removed 0) and now considering 236/236 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:49:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 02:49:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 97 ms returned [125]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 99 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 153/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 153 /153 variables (removed 0) and now considering 236/236 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 105 ms. Remains : 153/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:49:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-31 02:49:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-31 02:49:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 236 transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:49:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-31 02:49:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-31 02:49:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6574435217240792843.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-31 02:49:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4129112315647281443.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6574435217240792843.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4129112315647281443.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.55852e+07,3.10753,78504,2,8559,5,339954,6,0,851,261903,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E((AF(EG((((ControlRoomDispatch_2>=1)||(ControlRoomDispatch_3>=1))||((ControlRoomDispatch_0>=1)||(ControlRoomDispatch_1>=1))))) + !(AF(...7040
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,(!(EG(!(EG((((ControlRoomDispatch_2>=1)||(ControlRoomDispatch_3>=1))||((ControlRoomDispatch_0>=1...7104
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-31 02:49:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2024-05-31 02:49:39] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-31 02:49:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7417896357212402369.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7417896357212402369.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7417896357212402369.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7417896357212402369.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7417896357212402369.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-31 02:49:39] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-31 02:49:39] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-31 02:49:39] [INFO ] Removed a total of 207 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:49:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-31 02:49:39] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 121 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2024-05-31 02:49:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18118321051529168252.gal : 5 ms
[2024-05-31 02:49:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13875687744111854466.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18118321051529168252.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13875687744111854466.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.55852e+07,0.961066,30792,1975,170,64755,1046,492,65595,109,7876,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E((AF(EG((((i8.u8.ControlRoomDispatch_2>=1)||(i4.u11.ControlRoomDispatch_3>=1))||((i6.i0.u2.ControlRoomDispatch_0>=1)||(i7.u6.ControlRo...9384
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,(!(EG(!(EG((((i8.u8.ControlRoomDispatch_2>=1)||(i4.u11.ControlRoomDispatch_3>=1))||((i6.i0.u2.Co...9448
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,16.9323,400656,1,0,958948,3776,2858,650129,464,16203,1382095
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 107 transition count 189
Iterating global reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 107 transition count 189
Applied a total of 94 rules in 13 ms. Remains 107 /154 variables (removed 47) and now considering 189/236 (removed 47) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 189 rows 107 cols
[2024-05-31 02:49:56] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-31 02:49:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 93 ms returned [78]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 93 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 106/154 places, 189/236 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 106 /106 variables (removed 0) and now considering 189/189 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 110 ms. Remains : 106/154 places, 189/236 transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:49:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-31 02:49:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-31 02:49:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 189 transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:49:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-31 02:49:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-31 02:49:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7269757501519481572.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-31 02:49:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6897943097473548395.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7269757501519481572.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6897943097473548395.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.67804e+07,0.813389,21668,2,2465,5,80801,6,0,616,83145,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EF((!(E(EG((((IdleTechs_2>=1)&&(OpenRequests_3_2>=1))&&(Idles>=1))) U !((((IdleTechs_2>=1)&&(OpenRequests_1_1>=1))&&(Idles>=1))))) * (M...289
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((EX(((StartSecuring_1_3>=1)&&(ClientsTimeout_1>=1))) * (IdleTechs_3>=1)) * ((OpenRequests_3_3>...596
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,6.04749,147192,1,0,19,1.01969e+06,36,10,3351,376955,20
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Discarding 44 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 44 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 110 transition count 192
Iterating global reduction 0 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 110 transition count 192
Applied a total of 88 rules in 9 ms. Remains 110 /154 variables (removed 44) and now considering 192/236 (removed 44) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 192 rows 110 cols
[2024-05-31 02:50:02] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-31 02:50:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 98 ms returned [81]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 99 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 109/154 places, 192/236 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 109 /109 variables (removed 0) and now considering 192/192 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 114 ms. Remains : 109/154 places, 192/236 transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:50:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-31 02:50:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-31 02:50:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 192 transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:50:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-31 02:50:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-31 02:50:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2820438328432257138.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-31 02:50:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5147204827033618238.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2820438328432257138.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5147204827033618238.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.86012e+07,1.25868,32120,2,3001,5,115814,6,0,631,132515,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(((!(E((((IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(OpenRequests_1_3>=1))&&(Idles>=1)) U (MovetoZ_2_3_0>=1))) * ((EX(((StartSecuring_0_0<1)||(ClientsWaiting_0...586
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY((Init * E(TRUE U ((!(E((((IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(OpenRequests_1_3>=1))&&(Idles>=1)) U (MovetoZ_2_3_0>=1))) * (...976
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 103/153/89
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 190/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,3.57843,78392,1,0,19,429625,54,8,3550,189528,26
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 107 transition count 189
Iterating global reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 107 transition count 189
Applied a total of 94 rules in 5 ms. Remains 107 /154 variables (removed 47) and now considering 189/236 (removed 47) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 189 rows 107 cols
[2024-05-31 02:50:06] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-31 02:50:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 129 ms returned [78]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 130 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 106/154 places, 189/236 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 106 /106 variables (removed 0) and now considering 189/189 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 137 ms. Remains : 106/154 places, 189/236 transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:50:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-31 02:50:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-31 02:50:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 189 transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:50:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-31 02:50:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-31 02:50:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7947481786471830930.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-31 02:50:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14341015759463344634.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7947481786471830930.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14341015759463344634.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.67804e+07,1.00911,27168,2,2756,5,101320,6,0,616,112728,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AX(((EF((((IdleTechs_2>=1)&&(OpenRequests_3_1>=1))&&(Idles>=1))) + !(((MovetoZ_2_2_2<1)||(!(((IdleTechs_3>=1)&&(OpenRequests_3_3>=1))&&...349
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,!(EX(!(((E(TRUE U (((IdleTechs_2>=1)&&(OpenRequests_3_1>=1))&&(Idles>=1))) + !(((MovetoZ_2_2_2<1...405
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 100/153/89
(forward)formula 0,1,3.79563,86108,1,0,9,462544,28,2,3575,266046,15
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 107 transition count 189
Iterating global reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 107 transition count 189
Applied a total of 94 rules in 3 ms. Remains 107 /154 variables (removed 47) and now considering 189/236 (removed 47) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 189 rows 107 cols
[2024-05-31 02:50:10] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-31 02:50:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 02:50:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 02:50:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 200 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 267 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 185 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:50:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/107 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 189/296 variables, 107/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/296 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 296/296 variables, and 118 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved in 7522 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 107/107 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 185/185 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/107 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 189/296 variables, 107/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 185/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 0/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/296 variables, 0/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 296/296 variables, and 303 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved in 10462 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 107/107 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 185/185 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 18209ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 185 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 18211ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 107/154 places, 189/236 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 18482 ms. Remains : 107/154 places, 189/236 transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:50:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-31 02:50:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-31 02:50:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 189 transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:50:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-31 02:50:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-31 02:50:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16664510867372448195.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-31 02:50:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8741366880856203051.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16664510867372448195.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8741366880856203051.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.67804e+07,1.48481,37112,2,4889,5,142555,6,0,620,149395,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(((EF((((IdleTechs_3>=1)&&(OpenRequests_0_2>=1))&&(Idles>=1))) * (ControlRoomDispatch_1<1)) * ((Assigned_3_2<1)&&(((IdleTechs_0<1)||(O...638
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU((Init * !(E((E(TRUE U !((((((IdleTechs_3>=1)&&(OpenRequests_1_3>=1))&&((Idles>=1)&&(IdleTechs_3>=1)))&&...2096
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 182/0/7
(forward)formula 0,0,7.58223,163192,1,0,17,884687,43,8,3636,487804,21
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Discarding 44 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 44 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 110 transition count 192
Iterating global reduction 0 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 110 transition count 192
Applied a total of 88 rules in 3 ms. Remains 110 /154 variables (removed 44) and now considering 192/236 (removed 44) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 192 rows 110 cols
[2024-05-31 02:50:36] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-31 02:50:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 02:50:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 02:50:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 179 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 262 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 188 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:50:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/110 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 192/302 variables, 110/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/302 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 302/302 variables, and 121 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved in 7803 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 110/110 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 188/188 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/110 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 192/302 variables, 110/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 188/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 0/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/302 variables, 0/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 302/302 variables, and 309 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved in 9304 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 110/110 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 188/188 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 17325ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 188 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 17329ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 110/154 places, 192/236 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 17595 ms. Remains : 110/154 places, 192/236 transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:50:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-31 02:50:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-31 02:50:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 192 transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:50:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-31 02:50:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-31 02:50:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12553492682648920829.gal : 6 ms
[2024-05-31 02:50:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1818153591139287762.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12553492682648920829.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1818153591139287762.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.86221e+07,1.4779,38988,2,5161,5,151109,6,0,635,158430,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(EX((((StartSecuring_1_3>=1)&&(ClientsTimeout_1>=1)) + (EG((((IdleTechs_1<1)||(OpenRequests_3_1<1))||(Idles<1))) * !(E((((IdleTechs_0>...1094
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([((EY((Init * !(!(EG(!(EX((((StartSecuring_1_3>=1)&&(ClientsTimeout_1>=1)) + (EG((((IdleTechs_1<1)||(OpenRequ...3036
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 103/153/89
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 103/153/89
(forward)formula 0,1,8.96019,209004,1,0,45,1.3445e+06,75,18,3913,590838,41
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 106 transition count 188
Iterating global reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 106 transition count 188
Applied a total of 96 rules in 4 ms. Remains 106 /154 variables (removed 48) and now considering 188/236 (removed 48) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 188 rows 106 cols
[2024-05-31 02:51:02] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-31 02:51:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 88 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 02:51:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 02:51:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 145 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 247 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 184 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:51:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/106 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 188/294 variables, 106/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/294 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 294/294 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved in 7120 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 106/106 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 184/184 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/106 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 188/294 variables, 106/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 184/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 0/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/294 variables, 0/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 294/294 variables, and 301 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved in 7993 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 106/106 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 184/184 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 15274ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 15276ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 106/154 places, 188/236 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 15535 ms. Remains : 106/154 places, 188/236 transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:51:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-31 02:51:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-31 02:51:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 188 transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:51:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-31 02:51:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-31 02:51:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10038846500432952558.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-31 02:51:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability952129991818665744.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10038846500432952558.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability952129991818665744.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.61997e+07,1.42995,33916,2,4806,5,132497,6,0,615,134453,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AF(!(EF(((StartSecuring_0_1>=1)&&(ClientsTimeout_0>=1))))) U !(AX(AF((((((StartSecuring_1_1>=1)&&(ClientsTimeout_1>=1))||(((IdleTechs_0...244
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(!(EX(!(!(EG(!((((((StartSecuring_1_1>=1)&&(ClientsTimeout_1>=1))||(((IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(OpenRe...693
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,3.16977,61424,1,0,6,295249,25,1,3126,134453,7
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Performed 64 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 64
Iterating post reduction 0 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 154 transition count 172
Reduce places removed 64 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 16 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 16 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 80 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 90 transition count 156
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 90 transition count 140
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 176 place count 74 transition count 140
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 184 place count 70 transition count 136
Applied a total of 184 rules in 16 ms. Remains 70 /154 variables (removed 84) and now considering 136/236 (removed 100) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 136 rows 70 cols
[2024-05-31 02:51:21] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-31 02:51:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 85 ms returned [41]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 87 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 69/154 places, 136/236 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 69 /69 variables (removed 0) and now considering 136/136 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 107 ms. Remains : 69/154 places, 136/236 transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:51:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-31 02:51:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-31 02:51:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 136 transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:51:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-31 02:51:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-31 02:51:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6026168292981996800.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-31 02:51:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15027854867437418850.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6026168292981996800.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15027854867437418850.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.1605e+06,0.056948,4832,2,568,5,6368,6,0,415,5229,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(AG(E(EF((((IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(OpenRequests_1_0>=1))&&(Idles>=1))) U !(AG((((IdleTechs_3>=1)&&(OpenRequests_3_3>=1))&&(Idles>=1))))))) ...466
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(E(E(TRUE U (((IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(OpenRequests_1_0>=1))&&(Idles>=1))) U !(!(E(TRUE ...540
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 63/0/73
(forward)formula 0,0,0.910084,27452,1,0,13,157582,42,3,2243,86265,21
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 106 transition count 188
Iterating global reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 106 transition count 188
Applied a total of 96 rules in 5 ms. Remains 106 /154 variables (removed 48) and now considering 188/236 (removed 48) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 188 rows 106 cols
[2024-05-31 02:51:22] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-31 02:51:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 02:51:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 02:51:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 223 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 311 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 184 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:51:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/106 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 188/294 variables, 106/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/294 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 294/294 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved in 7569 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 106/106 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 184/184 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/106 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 188/294 variables, 106/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 184/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 0/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/294 variables, 0/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 294/294 variables, and 301 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved in 9132 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 106/106 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 184/184 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 16927ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 16930ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 106/154 places, 188/236 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 17247 ms. Remains : 106/154 places, 188/236 transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:51:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-31 02:51:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-31 02:51:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 188 transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:51:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-31 02:51:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-31 02:51:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13823475279266037021.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-31 02:51:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5007682901447652118.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13823475279266037021.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5007682901447652118.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.61997e+07,1.29371,33944,2,4806,5,132497,6,0,615,134453,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(((Clients_1>=1) * EF(((NumClientsReq<1)||(DoSecuring_1_1<1))))) * (AF((((IdleTechs_3>=1)&&(OpenRequests_0_3>=1))&&(Idles>=1))) + !(E(...384
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EX(((Clients_1>=1) * E(TRUE U ((NumClientsReq<1)||(DoSecuring_1_1<1)))))))] = FALSE * ([FwdG(FwdU((I...670
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 92/245/96
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 183/0/5
(forward)formula 0,0,3.74879,79472,1,0,8,348358,36,2,3426,235773,13
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2024-05-31 02:51:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-31 02:51:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-31 02:51:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-31 02:51:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5239533923147339063.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5239533923147339063.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5239533923147339063.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5239533923147339063.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5239533923147339063.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-31 02:51:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-31 02:51:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-31 02:51:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 208 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:51:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2024-05-31 02:51:44] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 109 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2024-05-31 02:51:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7936726198680781649.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-31 02:51:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15089318958072763076.ctl : 6 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7936726198680781649.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15089318958072763076.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 3 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.55852e+07,6.75003,152000,4654,1006,242191,6186,465,472035,115,450882,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(AX((A(((((u25.Finished_2>=1)||(u25.Finished_3>=1))||((u25.Finished_0>=1)||(u25.Finished_1>=1)))&&(((((((((i5.u16.IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(i5...22942
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY((Init * !(EG(!(EX(!((!((E(!(((((((((i5.u16.MovetoZ_1_2_0>=1)||(i0.u5.MovetoZ_1_2_2>=1))||((i5.u16.MovetoZ_...53304
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,59.565,1246820,1,0,2.63503e+06,16239,2776,2.81881e+06,522,621589,5203754
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (A(!((!(AF((((((((i7.u14.StartSecuring_0_2>=1)&&(i7.u26.ClientsWaiting_0>=1))||((i8.u22.StartSecuring_3_0>=1)&&(i8.u29.ClientsWaiting_3>=...15548
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(Init,!(EG(((((i1.u7.ControlRoomDispatch_2>=1)||(i8.u9.ControlRoomDispatch_3>=1))||((i7.u1.ControlRoomD...30152
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 1,0,171.998,2207924,1,0,4.38732e+06,19300,1065,5.2218e+06,293,688802,4076618
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: (A(EX((((((u25.Clients_0>=1)||(u25.Clients_1>=1))||((u25.Clients_2>=1)||(u25.Clients_3>=1))) * ((((((EG((((((((i5.u16.MovetoZ_1_2_0>=1)||...21422
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(!((E(!(EG(!(((E(TRUE U (((((((i7.u14.StartSecuring_0_2>=1)&&(i7.u26.ClientsWaiting_0>=1))||((i8...32585
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 2,1,209.274,2207924,1,0,4.38732e+06,19300,3159,5.2218e+06,428,708898,7423160
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Total runtime 697451 ms.

BK_STOP 1717124113954

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N04"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N04, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r444-smll-171701111100250"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N04.tgz
mv UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N04 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;