fond
Model Checking Contest 2024
14th edition, Geneva, Switzerland, June 25, 2024
Execution of r444-smll-171701111100244
Last Updated
July 7, 2024

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
896.424 75120.00 149072.00 507.30 TTFTFTTFTFFFFFFF normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r444-smll-171701111100244.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.....................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r444-smll-171701111100244
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 1.3M
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 23K Apr 13 05:45 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 154K Apr 13 05:45 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K Apr 13 05:42 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 137K Apr 13 05:42 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.0K Apr 23 08:04 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 34K Apr 23 08:04 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Apr 23 08:04 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 50K Apr 23 08:04 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 46K Apr 13 05:52 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 278K Apr 13 05:52 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 74K Apr 13 05:50 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 312K Apr 13 05:50 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.5K Apr 23 08:04 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.2K Apr 23 08:04 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 65K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1717123299138

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-31 02:41:41] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-31 02:41:41] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-31 02:41:42] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 133 ms
[2024-05-31 02:41:42] [INFO ] Transformed 80 places.
[2024-05-31 02:41:42] [INFO ] Transformed 150 transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:41:42] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 80 places and 150 transitions and 482 arcs in 460 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 34 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 4 formulas.
Ensure Unique test removed 32 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 32 transitions.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 68 out of 80 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 80/80 places, 118/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 22 ms. Remains 80 /80 variables (removed 0) and now considering 118/118 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 118 rows 80 cols
[2024-05-31 02:41:42] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 30 ms
[2024-05-31 02:41:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 371 ms returned [65]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 440 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 79/80 places, 118/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 79 /79 variables (removed 0) and now considering 118/118 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 508 ms. Remains : 79/80 places, 118/118 transitions.
Support contains 68 out of 79 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-31 02:41:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 108 ms
[2024-05-31 02:41:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
[2024-05-31 02:41:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 118 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 20 to 19
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1218 ms. (32 steps per ms) remains 1/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 658 steps (0 resets) in 10 ms. (59 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G((G((G(p1)||p0))||F(p2)))))'
Support contains 53 out of 79 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 118/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 79 /79 variables (removed 0) and now considering 118/118 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 118 rows 79 cols
[2024-05-31 02:41:44] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-05-31 02:41:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 114 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 02:41:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 02:41:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 198 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 318 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 116 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:41:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/79 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 118/197 variables, 79/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/197 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 197/197 variables, and 85 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved in 4279 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/79 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 118/197 variables, 79/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 116/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/197 variables, 0/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 197/197 variables, and 201 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved in 4894 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 9433ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9468ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9794 ms. Remains : 79/79 places, 118/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 477 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) p0 (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-00
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 7230 reset in 932 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 7058 reset in 602 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)))))]
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 11 factoid took 349 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 7 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 225 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) p0 (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 116 steps (0 resets) in 20 ms. (5 steps per ms) remains 0/7 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2))))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2))))), (F (NOT (OR p2 p0 p1))), (F (NOT (OR p2 p0 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT p0)), (F p2), (F (NOT (OR p2 (NOT p0) p1))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p0 p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 11 factoid took 728 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 162 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) p0 (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 168 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) p0 (NOT p1))]
Support contains 53 out of 79 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 118/118 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 77 transition count 116
Applied a total of 4 rules in 53 ms. Remains 77 /79 variables (removed 2) and now considering 116/118 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 77 cols
[2024-05-31 02:41:58] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-31 02:41:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 76 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 02:41:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 02:41:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 193 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 284 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 02:41:58] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 6 ms returned []
Running 106 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:41:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/77 variables, 2/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 116/193 variables, 77/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/193 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 193/193 variables, and 83 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved in 3940 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 77/77 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/77 variables, 2/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 116/193 variables, 77/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 106/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/193 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 193/193 variables, and 189 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved in 4249 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 77/77 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 8303ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8307ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 77/79 places, 116/118 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8659 ms. Remains : 77/79 places, 116/118 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) p0 p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p0 (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X p1)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (AND (NOT p2) p0 p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p0 p1))), (X (NOT p2)), (X p2), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) p0 p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p0 p1)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X p2)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 515 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 132 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) p0 (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 61 steps (0 resets) in 5 ms. (10 steps per ms) remains 0/7 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) p0 p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p0 (NOT p1)))), (X p0), (X p1)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (AND (NOT p2) p0 p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p0 p1))), (X (NOT p2)), (X p2), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) p0 p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p0 p1)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X p2)), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (F (NOT (OR p2 p0 p1))), (F (NOT (OR p2 p0 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT p0)), (F p2), (F (NOT (OR p2 (NOT p0) p1))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p0 p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 932 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 3 states, 6 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 139 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) p0 (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 135 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) p0 (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 136 ms :[(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) p0 (NOT p1))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 7857 reset in 882 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 7874 reset in 614 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin1578865123174711698
[2024-05-31 02:42:10] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 116 transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:42:10] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 2 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-31 02:42:10] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 116 transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:42:10] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-31 02:42:10] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 116 transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:42:10] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 2 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-31 02:42:10] [INFO ] Built C files in 48ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin1578865123174711698
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin1578865123174711698;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 745 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin1578865123174711698;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 64 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin1578865123174711698;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased10436401474357731161.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 5115 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-00 finished in 31851 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((p0||X(!p1))))'
Support contains 15 out of 79 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 118/118 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 55 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 55 transition count 94
Applied a total of 48 rules in 4 ms. Remains 55 /79 variables (removed 24) and now considering 94/118 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 55 cols
[2024-05-31 02:42:16] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-31 02:42:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 02:42:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 02:42:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 71 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 118 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 92 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:42:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/55 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 94/149 variables, 55/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/149 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 149/149 variables, and 61 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved in 2325 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 55/55 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/55 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 94/149 variables, 55/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 92/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/149 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 149/149 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved in 3201 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 55/55 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5581ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5584ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 55/79 places, 94/118 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5707 ms. Remains : 55/79 places, 94/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 171 ms :[true, (AND (NOT p0) p1), p1]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-02
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 19 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-02 finished in 5895 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(p0) U X(G((X(G(!p2))||p1)))))'
Support contains 33 out of 79 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 118/118 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 55 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 55 transition count 94
Applied a total of 48 rules in 5 ms. Remains 55 /79 variables (removed 24) and now considering 94/118 (removed 24) transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:42:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 02:42:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 02:42:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 02:42:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 86 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 147 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 92 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:42:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/55 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 94/149 variables, 55/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/149 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 149/149 variables, and 61 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved in 2325 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 55/55 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/55 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 94/149 variables, 55/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 92/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/149 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 149/149 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved in 2242 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 55/55 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4656ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4659ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 55/79 places, 94/118 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4812 ms. Remains : 55/79 places, 94/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 418 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) p2), (AND p2 (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p1) p2), p2, true, (AND p2 (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) p2), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-04
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-04 finished in 5266 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(F(!p0))))'
Support contains 2 out of 79 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 118/118 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 55 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 55 transition count 94
Applied a total of 48 rules in 6 ms. Remains 55 /79 variables (removed 24) and now considering 94/118 (removed 24) transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:42:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 02:42:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 133 ms returned [40]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 135 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/79 places, 94/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 94/94 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 144 ms. Remains : 54/79 places, 94/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 149 ms :[p0, p0, p0]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-05
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 19326 reset in 186 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 19345 reset in 130 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 122 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 118 ms :[p0, p0, p0]
RANDOM walk for 13 steps (0 resets) in 5 ms. (2 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 175 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 146 ms :[p0, p0, p0]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 140 ms :[p0, p0, p0]
Support contains 2 out of 54 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 94/94 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 94/94 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 54 cols
[2024-05-31 02:42:29] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-31 02:42:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 86 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 02:42:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 02:42:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 126 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 225 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 92 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:42:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/54 variables, 4/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 94/148 variables, 54/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 148/148 variables, and 59 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved in 2539 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/54 variables, 4/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 94/148 variables, 54/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 92/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 0/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 148/148 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved in 2595 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5168ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5171ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5398 ms. Remains : 54/54 places, 94/94 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 160 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 145 ms :[p0, p0, p0]
RANDOM walk for 16 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (3 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 197 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 3 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 141 ms :[p0, p0, p0]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 145 ms :[p0, p0, p0]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 144 ms :[p0, p0, p0]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 19271 reset in 191 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 19354 reset in 279 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [true, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 155 ms :[p0, p0, p0]
Support contains 2 out of 54 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 54/54 places, 94/94 transitions.
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 54 transition count 102
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 54 transition count 102
Performed 18 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -6
Deduced a syphon composed of 26 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 54 transition count 108
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 54 transition count 100
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 51 transition count 76
Deduced a syphon composed of 26 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 51 transition count 76
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 33 transition count 46
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 1 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 33 transition count 46
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 88 place count 21 transition count 34
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 21 transition count 34
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 21 transition count 22
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 112 rules in 30 ms. Remains 21 /54 variables (removed 33) and now considering 22/94 (removed 72) transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:42:36] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 20 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 22 rows 21 cols
[2024-05-31 02:42:36] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
[2024-05-31 02:42:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/21 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
[2024-05-31 02:42:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD18 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD19 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 15 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 15 unsolved
Problem TDEAD0 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD2 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD14 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 22/43 variables, 21/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/43 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 10 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 43/43 variables, and 28 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 10 solved, 10 unsolved in 480 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 21/21 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 10 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 10/21 variables, 5/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 22/43 variables, 21/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 10/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/43 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 10 solved, 10 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 43/43 variables, and 38 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 10 solved, 10 unsolved in 227 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 21/21 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 10/20 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 714ms problems are : Problem set: 10 solved, 10 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 10 dead transitions in 715ms
Found 10 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 10 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 10 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 21/54 places, 12/94 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 24 edges and 21 vertex of which 13 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 8 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 8 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 9 ms. Remains 13 /21 variables (removed 8) and now considering 12/12 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 13/54 places, 12/94 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 763 ms. Remains : 13/54 places, 12/94 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin1814679720089398482
[2024-05-31 02:42:37] [INFO ] Built C files in 6ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin1814679720089398482
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin1814679720089398482;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 489 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin1814679720089398482;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 50 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin1814679720089398482;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased4752663373299763213.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 7526 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-05 finished in 17605 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((X(!p1)||p0)))'
Support contains 4 out of 79 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 118/118 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 55 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 55 transition count 94
Applied a total of 48 rules in 4 ms. Remains 55 /79 variables (removed 24) and now considering 94/118 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 55 cols
[2024-05-31 02:42:45] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-31 02:42:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 97 ms returned [40]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 98 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/79 places, 94/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 94/94 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 104 ms. Remains : 54/79 places, 94/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 73 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-06
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 142 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 300 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 5 factoid took 21 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 2 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-06 finished in 659 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(!p0)))'
Support contains 13 out of 79 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 118/118 transitions.
Performed 32 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 32
Iterating post reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 79 transition count 86
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 47 transition count 78
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 47 transition count 70
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 39 transition count 70
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 37 transition count 68
Applied a total of 92 rules in 17 ms. Remains 37 /79 variables (removed 42) and now considering 68/118 (removed 50) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 37 cols
[2024-05-31 02:42:45] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-31 02:42:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 02:42:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 02:42:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 108 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 178 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 02:42:46] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 58 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:42:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/37 variables, 2/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 68/105 variables, 37/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 105/105 variables, and 43 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved in 1085 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 58/58 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/37 variables, 2/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 68/105 variables, 37/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 58/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 105/105 variables, and 101 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved in 1194 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 58/58 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2327ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2329ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 37/79 places, 68/118 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2533 ms. Remains : 37/79 places, 68/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 35 ms :[p0]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-07
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 471 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 45 steps with 0 reset with depth 46 and stack size 46 in 0 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-07 finished in 3060 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 5 out of 79 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 118/118 transitions.
Performed 32 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 32
Iterating post reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 79 transition count 86
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 47 transition count 78
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 47 transition count 71
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 40 transition count 71
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 88 place count 38 transition count 55
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 38 transition count 55
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 94 place count 34 transition count 51
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 34 transition count 51
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 31 transition count 45
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 31 transition count 45
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 107 place count 28 transition count 39
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 28 transition count 39
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 28 transition count 36
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 25 transition count 33
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 24 transition count 32
Applied a total of 121 rules in 22 ms. Remains 24 /79 variables (removed 55) and now considering 32/118 (removed 86) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 24 cols
[2024-05-31 02:42:49] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-31 02:42:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 02:42:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 02:42:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 45 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 90 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 02:42:49] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 26 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:42:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/24 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 32/56 variables, 24/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/56 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 56/56 variables, and 30 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved in 331 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/24 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 32/56 variables, 24/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 26/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/56 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 56/56 variables, and 56 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved in 395 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 739ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 740ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 24/79 places, 32/118 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 859 ms. Remains : 24/79 places, 32/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 45 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-09
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 193 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 28 steps with 0 reset with depth 29 and stack size 29 in 1 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-09 finished in 1112 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 79 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 118/118 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 55 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 55 transition count 94
Applied a total of 48 rules in 4 ms. Remains 55 /79 variables (removed 24) and now considering 94/118 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 55 cols
[2024-05-31 02:42:50] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-31 02:42:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 113 ms returned [40]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 115 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/79 places, 94/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 94/94 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 122 ms. Remains : 54/79 places, 94/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 110 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-11
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-11 finished in 251 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(p0) U (X(G(p1)) U (p2||X(G(!p2))))))'
Support contains 4 out of 79 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 118/118 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 55 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 55 transition count 94
Applied a total of 48 rules in 4 ms. Remains 55 /79 variables (removed 24) and now considering 94/118 (removed 24) transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:42:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 02:42:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 109 ms returned [40]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 111 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/79 places, 94/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 94/94 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 117 ms. Remains : 54/79 places, 94/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 235 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2), (AND (NOT p0) p2), (NOT p0), false]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-12
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 59 reset in 214 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 3379 steps with 2 reset with depth 50 and stack size 50 in 15 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-12 finished in 620 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((p0 U X(G((p1||X((G(p2) U (p1&&G(p2))))))))))'
Support contains 5 out of 79 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 118/118 transitions.
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 56 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 56 transition count 95
Applied a total of 46 rules in 5 ms. Remains 56 /79 variables (removed 23) and now considering 95/118 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 95 rows 56 cols
[2024-05-31 02:42:51] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-31 02:42:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 136 ms returned [41]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 138 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 55/79 places, 95/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 55 /55 variables (removed 0) and now considering 95/95 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 146 ms. Remains : 55/79 places, 95/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 548 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), true, (NOT p2), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-13
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 425 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-13 finished in 751 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)&&F((G(p1)&&X(X(G(p2))))))))'
Support contains 5 out of 79 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 118/118 transitions.
Performed 31 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 31
Iterating post reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 79 transition count 87
Reduce places removed 31 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 48 transition count 80
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 48 transition count 72
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 40 transition count 72
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 87 place count 38 transition count 56
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 38 transition count 56
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 93 place count 34 transition count 52
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 34 transition count 52
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 30 transition count 44
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 30 transition count 44
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 109 place count 26 transition count 36
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 26 transition count 36
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 26 transition count 32
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 23 transition count 29
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 23 transition count 29
Applied a total of 124 rules in 24 ms. Remains 23 /79 variables (removed 56) and now considering 29/118 (removed 89) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 29 rows 23 cols
[2024-05-31 02:42:51] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-31 02:42:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2024-05-31 02:42:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-31 02:42:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 106 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-31 02:42:51] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 25 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-31 02:42:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/23 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 29/52 variables, 23/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/52 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 52/52 variables, and 29 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved in 462 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/23 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 29/52 variables, 23/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 25/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/52 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 52/52 variables, and 54 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved in 464 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 938ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 940ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 23/79 places, 29/118 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1084 ms. Remains : 23/79 places, 29/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 476 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p0), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p1), (NOT p2), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-14
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 6210 reset in 364 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 24 steps with 0 reset with depth 25 and stack size 25 in 1 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-14 finished in 1964 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 79 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 118/118 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 31 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 31 transitions
Performed 31 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 31
Iterating post reduction 0 with 31 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 79 transition count 87
Reduce places removed 31 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 48 transition count 80
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 48 transition count 72
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 40 transition count 72
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 87 place count 38 transition count 56
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 38 transition count 56
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 93 place count 34 transition count 52
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 34 transition count 52
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 30 transition count 44
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 30 transition count 44
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 109 place count 26 transition count 36
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 26 transition count 36
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 26 transition count 32
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 18 transition count 24
Applied a total of 133 rules in 22 ms. Remains 18 /79 variables (removed 61) and now considering 24/118 (removed 94) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 24 rows 18 cols
[2024-05-31 02:42:53] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-31 02:42:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned [13]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 64 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 17/79 places, 24/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 17 /17 variables (removed 0) and now considering 24/24 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 88 ms. Remains : 17/79 places, 24/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 99 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-15
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1884 reset in 268 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 23 steps with 0 reset with depth 24 and stack size 24 in 0 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02-LTLFireability-15 finished in 476 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 72401 ms.

BK_STOP 1717123374258

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r444-smll-171701111100244"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02.tgz
mv UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z4T4N02 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;