Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r444-smll-171701110900186.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r444-smll-171701110900186
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 748K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 13 05:10 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 110K Apr 13 05:10 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 13 05:06 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 81K Apr 13 05:06 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.1K Apr 23 08:04 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 36K Apr 23 08:04 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K Apr 23 08:04 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K Apr 23 08:04 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 13 05:16 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 111K Apr 13 05:16 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 38K Apr 13 05:14 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 184K Apr 13 05:14 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.5K Apr 23 08:04 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.1K Apr 23 08:04 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 47K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-12
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-13
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-14
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1717106322876

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-30 21:58:44] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-30 21:58:44] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-30 21:58:44] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 83 ms
[2024-05-30 21:58:44] [INFO ] Transformed 72 places.
[2024-05-30 21:58:44] [INFO ] Transformed 108 transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:58:45] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 72 places and 108 transitions and 340 arcs in 363 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 28 ms.
[2024-05-30 21:58:45] [INFO ] Reduced 4 identical enabling conditions.
Ensure Unique test removed 16 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 16 transitions.
Support contains 72 out of 72 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 14 ms. Remains 72 /72 variables (removed 0) and now considering 92/92 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 72 cols
[2024-05-30 21:58:45] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 27 ms
[2024-05-30 21:58:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 331 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 21:58:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 21:58:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 122 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 503 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 88 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:58:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/72 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 92/164 variables, 72/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/164 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 164/164 variables, and 83 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 2743 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/72 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 92/164 variables, 72/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 88/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/164 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 164/164 variables, and 171 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 2112 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4991ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5019ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5570 ms. Remains : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Support contains 72 out of 72 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-30 21:58:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 49 ms
[2024-05-30 21:58:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2024-05-30 21:58:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 53 to 50
RANDOM walk for 10798 steps (1 resets) in 527 ms. (20 steps per ms) remains 0/50 properties
[2024-05-30 21:58:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-30 21:58:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-05-30 21:58:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Performed 16 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 72 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 56 transition count 68
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 56 transition count 60
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 48 transition count 60
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 44 transition count 56
Applied a total of 64 rules in 33 ms. Remains 44 /72 variables (removed 28) and now considering 56/92 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 44 cols
[2024-05-30 21:58:51] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-30 21:58:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned [23]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 66 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 43/72 places, 56/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 43 /43 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 102 ms. Remains : 43/72 places, 56/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:58:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 21:58:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 21:58:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:58:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 21:58:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 21:58:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4644603815143888103.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 21:58:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15010896880939971527.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4644603815143888103.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15010896880939971527.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,34251,0.030592,3668,2,265,5,1456,6,0,231,1061,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((((((IdleTechs_1<1)||(OpenRequests_1_1<1))||(Idles<1))&&(((IdleTechs_0<1)||(OpenRequests_0_0<1))||(Idles<1)))&&((((IdleTechs_1<1)||(O...466
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((((((IdleTechs_1<1)||(OpenRequests_1_1<1))||(Idles<1))&&(((IdleTechs_0<1)||(OpenRequests_0_0<1))||(I...509
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 20/40/36
(forward)formula 0,0,0.074227,5072,1,0,7,8706,19,1,1210,3783,8
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 72 /72 variables (removed 0) and now considering 92/92 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 72 cols
[2024-05-30 21:58:52] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-30 21:58:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 21:58:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 21:58:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 77 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 122 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 88 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:58:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/72 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 92/164 variables, 72/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/164 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 164/164 variables, and 83 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 1865 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/72 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 92/164 variables, 72/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 88/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/164 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 164/164 variables, and 171 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 1937 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3858ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3861ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3986 ms. Remains : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:58:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-30 21:58:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-30 21:58:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:58:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 21:58:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-30 21:58:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7430280549541914562.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 21:58:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9245738093748649497.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7430280549541914562.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9245738093748649497.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,210432,0.082569,5904,2,1373,5,12281,6,0,383,9587,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((A(EG(EF((((ClientsWaiting_1>=1)||(ClientsWaiting_0>=1))||((ClientsWaiting_3>=1)||(ClientsWaiting_2>=1))))) U EG((EX((((((((IdleTechs_...4628
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!((E(!(EG((EX((((((((IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(OpenRequests_0_1>=1))&&(Idles>=1))||(((IdleTechs_1>=1)&&(Open...8184
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 20/1742/72
(forward)formula 0,1,1.60858,47620,1,0,13,280120,50,3,2451,132704,20
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 72 transition count 84
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 64 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 6 ms. Remains 64 /72 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 64 cols
[2024-05-30 21:58:57] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 21:58:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned [43]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 54 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 63 /63 variables (removed 0) and now considering 84/84 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 64 ms. Remains : 63/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:58:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 21:58:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 21:58:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:58:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 21:58:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 21:58:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3844691551148774631.gal : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 21:58:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7660289916485005049.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3844691551148774631.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7660289916485005049.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,144896,0.03682,4500,2,601,5,4539,6,0,339,3328,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((((((AG((((ControlRoomDispatch_3>=1)||(ControlRoomDispatch_2>=1))||((ControlRoomDispatch_1>=1)||(ControlRoomDispatch_0>=1)))) * (Move...2276
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((((((((IdleTechs_0<1)||(OpenRequests_3_0<1))||(Idles<1))&&(((IdleTechs_0<1)||(OpenReq...2340
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.109832,6876,1,0,6,21847,15,0,1584,4433,5
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 72 /72 variables (removed 0) and now considering 92/92 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 72 cols
[2024-05-30 21:58:58] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 21:58:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 21:58:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 21:58:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 71 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 106 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-30 21:58:58] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 88 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:58:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/72 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 92/164 variables, 72/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/164 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 164/164 variables, and 83 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 1689 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/72 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 92/164 variables, 72/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 88/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/164 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 164/164 variables, and 171 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 2485 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4221ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4223ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4346 ms. Remains : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:59:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:59:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8481457806935804429.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18367802929807898476.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8481457806935804429.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18367802929807898476.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,210432,0.082225,5904,2,1373,5,12281,6,0,383,9587,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(E((((((((!(((((StartSecuring_1_1>=1)&&(ClientsTimeout_1>=1))||((StartSecuring_0_1>=1)&&(ClientsTimeout_0>=1)))||(((StartSecuring_3_0>...6261
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(E((((((((!(((((StartSecuring_1_1>=1)&&(ClientsTimeout_1>=1))||((StartSecuring_0_1>=1)&&(ClientsTim...8222
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 48/42/44
(forward)formula 0,1,4.01137,104484,1,0,93,624582,48,60,2185,525288,89
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Performed 16 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 72 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 56 transition count 68
Applied a total of 40 rules in 6 ms. Remains 56 /72 variables (removed 16) and now considering 68/92 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 56 cols
[2024-05-30 21:59:06] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 21:59:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 21:59:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 57 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 96 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-30 21:59:06] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 64 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:59:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/56 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 68/124 variables, 56/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/124 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 124/124 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved in 1019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 56/56 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/56 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 68/124 variables, 56/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 64/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/124 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 124/124 variables, and 131 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved in 1182 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 56/56 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2223ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2225ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 56/72 places, 68/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2333 ms. Remains : 56/72 places, 68/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:59:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 68 transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:59:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17287665359076126201.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4377144027583734375.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17287665359076126201.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4377144027583734375.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,91648,0.030045,4212,2,692,5,4282,6,0,295,2904,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(((EF(((((((StartSecuring_2_0>=1)&&(ClientsWaiting_2>=1))||((StartSecuring_0_1>=1)&&(ClientsWaiting_0>=1)))||(((StartSecuring_3_0>=1...3529
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(((E(TRUE U ((((((StartSecuring_2_0>=1)&&(ClientsWaiting_2>=1))||((StartSecuring...3605
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.62413,21836,1,0,9,122804,26,3,1584,58244,10
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 64 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 64 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 4 ms. Remains 64 /72 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 64 cols
[2024-05-30 21:59:09] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned [42]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 66 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 63 /63 variables (removed 0) and now considering 84/84 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 71 ms. Remains : 63/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:59:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:59:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16287333068410220578.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5840458743094316212.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16287333068410220578.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5840458743094316212.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,144896,0.060916,5240,2,1234,5,9275,6,0,339,6379,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A(((((Assigned_1_0>=1)||(Assigned_1_1>=1))||((Assigned_2_0>=1)||(Assigned_2_1>=1)))||(((Assigned_3_0>=1)||(Assigned_3_1>=1))||((Assign...1045
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!(!(EX(!((!(EG(!((((Finished_1>=1)||(Finished_0>=1))||((Finished_3>=1)||(Finished_2>=1)))))) + !...2895
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.871222,27432,1,0,7,154003,34,1,1805,70257,11
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 64 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 64 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 4 ms. Remains 64 /72 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:59:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 21:59:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned [43]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 47 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 63 /63 variables (removed 0) and now considering 84/84 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 53 ms. Remains : 63/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:59:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:59:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14488648875123953832.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8427532239809703142.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14488648875123953832.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8427532239809703142.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,144896,0.034835,4236,2,636,5,4357,6,0,339,3082,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((EX(AX((((((StartSecuring_1_1<1)||(ClientsTimeout_1<1))&&((StartSecuring_0_1<1)||(ClientsTimeout_0<1)))&&(((StartSecuring_3_0<1)||(Cli...1327
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(EX(!(EX(!((((((StartSecuring_1_1<1)||(ClientsTimeout_1<1))&&((StartSecuring_0_1<1)||(ClientsTime...1412
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,0.337659,13460,1,0,14,68510,23,3,1851,31307,13
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 64 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 64 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 3 ms. Remains 64 /72 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:59:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 21:59:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 21:59:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 21:59:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 68 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 102 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 80 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:59:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/64 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 84/148 variables, 64/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 148/148 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 1434 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/64 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 84/148 variables, 64/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 80/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 148/148 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 2284 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3753ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3754ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3860 ms. Remains : 64/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:59:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:59:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15737285266689816190.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13185350282113241280.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15737285266689816190.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13185350282113241280.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,144896,0.040287,4536,2,819,5,5528,6,0,343,3812,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AX(AF((((Finished_1>=1)||(Finished_0>=1))||((Finished_3>=1)||(Finished_2>=1))))) + (((((((IdleTechs_1<1)||(OpenRequests_1_1<1))||(Idl...2402
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(EX(!(!(EG(!((((Finished_1>=1)||(Finished_0>=1))||((Finished_3>=1)||(Finished_2>=1))))))))) + (((...2828
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 60/168/24
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,1.52363,38208,1,0,11,252250,47,1,2107,120923,13
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Performed 15 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 15
Iterating post reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 72 transition count 77
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 57 transition count 69
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 57 transition count 61
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 49 transition count 61
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 49 transition count 61
Applied a total of 55 rules in 18 ms. Remains 49 /72 variables (removed 23) and now considering 61/92 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 49 cols
[2024-05-30 21:59:16] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 21:59:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 21:59:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 123 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-30 21:59:16] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 56 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:59:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/49 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 61/110 variables, 49/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/110 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 110/110 variables, and 60 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved in 918 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/49 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 61/110 variables, 49/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 56/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/110 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 110/110 variables, and 116 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved in 1110 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2054ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2056ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/72 places, 61/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2203 ms. Remains : 49/72 places, 61/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:59:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 61 transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:59:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15260614103650623528.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1632773304946172277.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15260614103650623528.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1632773304946172277.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,55040,0.028009,4164,2,499,5,3261,6,0,260,2348,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(!(A((((ControlRoomDispatch_3>=1) * (EG((((IdleTechs_1>=1)&&(OpenRequests_0_1>=1))&&(Idles>=1))) + ((MovetoZ_0_0_1>=1)&&(Clients_3>=1))...392
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!((E(!((((IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(OpenRequests_2_1>=1))&&(Idles>=1))) U (!((((ControlRoomDispatch_3>=1) *...580
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 36/0/25
(forward)formula 0,1,0.351176,13932,1,0,59,58258,40,48,1405,56026,61
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Performed 13 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 13
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 72 transition count 79
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 59 transition count 73
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 59 transition count 68
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 54 transition count 68
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 54 transition count 68
Applied a total of 43 rules in 15 ms. Remains 54 /72 variables (removed 18) and now considering 68/92 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 54 cols
[2024-05-30 21:59:19] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 21:59:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 21:59:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 86 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 146 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-30 21:59:19] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 63 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:59:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/54 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 122/122 variables, and 65 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved in 1276 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/54 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 68/122 variables, 54/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 63/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/122 variables, and 128 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved in 1302 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2611ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2613ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/72 places, 68/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2786 ms. Remains : 54/72 places, 68/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:59:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 68 transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:59:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3905675408136278860.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6747616536339470809.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3905675408136278860.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6747616536339470809.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,79872,0.035609,4492,2,734,5,4807,6,0,287,3520,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(E(AF(((!((MovetoZ_0_0_1>=1)||((StartSecuring_2_1>=1)&&(ClientsWaiting_2>=1))))||(!(((IdleTechs_1>=1)&&(OpenRequests_1_0>=1))&&(Idles>=...689
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(!(EG(!(((!((MovetoZ_0_0_1>=1)||((StartSecuring_2_1>=1)&&(ClientsWaiting_2>=1))))||(!(((IdleTechs_1>...744
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.25969,11884,1,0,8,52073,27,1,1564,19158,14
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 65 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 65 transition count 85
Applied a total of 14 rules in 4 ms. Remains 65 /72 variables (removed 7) and now considering 85/92 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 65 cols
[2024-05-30 21:59:22] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned [44]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 67 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/72 places, 85/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 64 /64 variables (removed 0) and now considering 85/85 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 73 ms. Remains : 64/72 places, 85/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:59:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 85 transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:59:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10229951260382453658.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1725042802527585622.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10229951260382453658.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1725042802527585622.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,152320,0.034431,4244,2,640,5,4334,6,0,344,3063,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((EG((!(A((Assigned_3_1>=1) U (((IdleTechs_1>=1)&&(OpenRequests_2_1>=1))&&(Idles>=1)))) + EF((MovetoZ_3_1_0<1)))) * (ControlRoomDispatc...163
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((EY(Init) * (ControlRoomDispatch_0<1)),(!(!((E(!((((IdleTechs_1>=1)&&(OpenRequests_2_1>=1))&&(Idles>=1))) ...351
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 52/0/33
(forward)formula 0,1,0.279015,12164,1,0,12,55789,32,4,1874,26151,17
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Performed 14 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 14
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 72 transition count 78
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 58 transition count 72
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 58 transition count 64
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 50 transition count 64
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 46 transition count 60
Applied a total of 58 rules in 16 ms. Remains 46 /72 variables (removed 26) and now considering 60/92 (removed 32) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 46 cols
[2024-05-30 21:59:22] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned [25]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 69 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/72 places, 60/92 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 41 transition count 56
Applied a total of 8 rules in 8 ms. Remains 41 /45 variables (removed 4) and now considering 56/60 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 41 cols
[2024-05-30 21:59:22] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 21:59:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 21:59:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 99 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 41/72 places, 56/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 193 ms. Remains : 41/72 places, 56/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:59:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:59:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7240232428462205186.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10172230617685058597.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7240232428462205186.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10172230617685058597.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,33957,0.016579,3796,2,299,5,1576,6,0,223,1104,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((((IdleTechs_0<1)||(OpenRequests_3_0<1)) + ((Idles<1) + !(A(EF((MovetoZ_3_0_0>=1)) U AG((MovetoZ_3_1_1>=1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(((IdleTechs_0<1)||(OpenRequests_3_0<1)) + ((Idles<1) + !(!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !((MovetoZ_3_1_1>=1))))) ...291
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.05972,5168,1,0,9,9588,23,3,1171,4450,16
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 64 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 64 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 3 ms. Remains 64 /72 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 64 cols
[2024-05-30 21:59:22] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned [43]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 54 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 63 /63 variables (removed 0) and now considering 84/84 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 58 ms. Remains : 63/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:59:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:59:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7630001237134586510.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14089756844020802857.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7630001237134586510.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14089756844020802857.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,144896,0.056622,4504,2,636,5,4357,6,0,339,3082,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((IdleTechs_1>=1)&&(OpenRequests_0_0>=1)) * ((Idles>=1) * (((StartSecuring_3_0>=1)&&(ClientsTimeout_3>=1)) + (((IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(Ope...486
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((IdleTechs_1>=1)&&(OpenRequests_0_0>=1)) * ((Idles>=1) * (((StartSecuring_3_0>=1)&&(ClientsTimeou...549
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.965459,23440,1,0,80,113156,38,62,1700,107982,73
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 65 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 65 transition count 85
Applied a total of 14 rules in 3 ms. Remains 65 /72 variables (removed 7) and now considering 85/92 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 65 cols
[2024-05-30 21:59:23] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 21:59:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 21:59:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 139 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 81 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:59:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/65 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 85/150 variables, 65/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/150 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 150/150 variables, and 76 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 1559 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/65 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 85/150 variables, 65/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 81/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/150 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 150/150 variables, and 157 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 1888 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3471ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3473ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 65/72 places, 85/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3615 ms. Remains : 65/72 places, 85/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:59:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 85 transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:59:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5446485620114891425.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7687088896957194074.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5446485620114891425.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7687088896957194074.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,152320,0.067144,5336,2,1136,5,8875,6,0,348,6818,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG(((((Clients_0>=1) * EF((((IdleTechs_1>=1)&&(OpenRequests_2_0>=1))&&(Idles>=1)))) * ((MovetoZ_0_0_1<1)&&((StartSecuring_3_0<1)||(Cli...327
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),((((Clients_0>=1) * E(TRUE U (((IdleTechs_1>=1)&&(OpenRequests_2_0>=1))&&(Idles>=1)))) * ((Moveto...376
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.581147,20256,1,0,55,93492,23,41,1772,78866,51
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 64 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 64 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 4 ms. Remains 64 /72 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 64 cols
[2024-05-30 21:59:28] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned [43]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 50 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 63 /63 variables (removed 0) and now considering 84/84 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 56 ms. Remains : 63/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:59:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:59:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8066727532453377340.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9043059081643210493.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8066727532453377340.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9043059081643210493.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,144896,0.034323,4240,2,636,5,4357,6,0,339,3082,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(A((((IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(OpenRequests_3_0>=1))&&(Idles>=1)) U (((IdleTechs_1>=1)&&(OpenRequests_3_1>=1))&&(Idles>=1))) U EG(AF(!(EX((((Id...210
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,!((E(!((((IdleTechs_1>=1)&&(OpenRequests_3_1>=1))&&(Idles>=1))) U (!((((IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(OpenRe...399
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 51/0/33
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,0.799723,27348,1,0,72,138901,38,59,1809,133848,73
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 69 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 69 transition count 89
Applied a total of 6 rules in 3 ms. Remains 69 /72 variables (removed 3) and now considering 89/92 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 69 cols
[2024-05-30 21:59:28] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 21:59:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 21:59:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 85 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 129 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 85 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:59:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/69 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 89/158 variables, 69/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/158 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 158/158 variables, and 80 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved in 1815 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 69/69 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 85/85 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/69 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 89/158 variables, 69/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 85/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/158 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 158/158 variables, and 165 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved in 2291 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 69/69 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 85/85 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4135ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4136ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 69/72 places, 89/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4269 ms. Remains : 69/72 places, 89/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:59:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 89 transitions.
[2024-05-30 21:59:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16096626363242612929.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9642401507850603690.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16096626363242612929.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9642401507850603690.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,184064,0.07576,5884,2,1215,5,11221,6,0,368,8745,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(!(A((A((((IdleTechs_1>=1)&&(OpenRequests_2_1>=1))&&(Idles>=1)) U (((IdleTechs_1>=1)&&(OpenRequests_2_1>=1))&&(Idles>=1))) + ((MovetoZ...635
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU((Init * !(!(E(TRUE U !(!(!((E(!(EX(!(EX(!((((IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(OpenRequests_2_0>=1))&&(Idles>=1))))))) ...2939
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 56/0/33
Using saturation style SCC detection
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 84/0/5
(forward)formula 0,0,0.792897,26400,1,0,29,136676,49,17,2156,75499,27
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2024-05-30 21:59:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 21:59:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Total runtime 49421 ms.

BK_STOP 1717106374148

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r444-smll-171701110900186"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04.tgz
mv UtilityControlRoom-PT-Z2T4N04 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;