Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r444-smll-171701110800114.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N04, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r444-smll-171701110800114
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 528K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.7K Apr 13 05:21 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 71K Apr 13 05:21 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K Apr 13 05:18 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 50K Apr 13 05:18 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.7K Apr 23 08:04 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K Apr 23 08:04 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.9K Apr 23 08:04 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 23 08:04 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 13 05:31 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 151K Apr 13 05:31 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K Apr 13 05:28 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 87K Apr 13 05:28 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.9K Apr 23 08:04 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.0K Apr 23 08:04 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-12
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-13
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-14
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1717091045394

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N04
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is COL
CTLFireability COL
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-30 17:44:07] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-30 17:44:07] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-30 17:44:07] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2024-05-30 17:44:08] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2024-05-30 17:44:08] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 1041 ms
[2024-05-30 17:44:08] [INFO ] Imported 13 HL places and 12 HL transitions for a total of 154 PT places and 300.0 transition bindings in 24 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 37 ms.
[2024-05-30 17:44:08] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 13 places and 12 transitions 37 arcs in 7 ms.
[2024-05-30 17:44:08] [INFO ] Skeletonized 16 HLPN properties in 6 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Remains 9 properties that can be checked using skeleton over-approximation.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 1 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 15 to 14
RANDOM walk for 40009 steps (8 resets) in 819 ms. (48 steps per ms) remains 1/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 392 ms. (101 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 11 rows 13 cols
[2024-05-30 17:44:09] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 6 ms
Problem AtomicPropp8 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 4/24 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 158 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 215ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 9 simplifications.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-30 17:44:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2024-05-30 17:44:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Transition timeout forces synchronizations/join behavior on parameter c of sort Cli
Domain [Cli(4), Z(4), Z(4)] of place MovetoZ breaks symmetries in sort Z
[2024-05-30 17:44:09] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 154 places and 300 transitions 964 arcs in 40 ms.
[2024-05-30 17:44:09] [INFO ] Unfolded 15 HLPN properties in 1 ms.
[2024-05-30 17:44:09] [INFO ] Reduced 12 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-30 17:44:09] [INFO ] Reduced 12 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-30 17:44:09] [INFO ] Reduced 12 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-30 17:44:09] [INFO ] Reduced 12 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-30 17:44:09] [INFO ] Reduced 12 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-30 17:44:09] [INFO ] Reduced 12 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-30 17:44:09] [INFO ] Reduced 12 identical enabling conditions.
Ensure Unique test removed 64 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 64 transitions.
Support contains 154 out of 154 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 154 /154 variables (removed 0) and now considering 236/236 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 236 rows 154 cols
[2024-05-30 17:44:09] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 21 ms
[2024-05-30 17:44:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 143 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 17:44:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 17:44:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 235 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 390 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 232 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:44:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/154 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 236/390 variables, 154/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/390 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 390/390 variables, and 165 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved in 12422 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 232/232 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/154 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 236/390 variables, 154/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 232/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 0/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/390 variables, 0/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 390/390 variables, and 397 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved in 15631 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 232/232 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 28458ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 28480ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 28904 ms. Remains : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Support contains 154 out of 154 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-30 17:44:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 55 ms
[2024-05-30 17:44:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 81 ms
[2024-05-30 17:44:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 236 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 1041 steps (0 resets) in 44 ms. (23 steps per ms) remains 0/28 properties
[2024-05-30 17:44:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2024-05-30 17:44:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 57 ms
[2024-05-30 17:44:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 236 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 154 /154 variables (removed 0) and now considering 236/236 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:44:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 17:44:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 17:44:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 17:44:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 142 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 210 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 232 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:44:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/154 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 236/390 variables, 154/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/390 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 390/390 variables, and 165 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved in 12600 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 232/232 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/154 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 236/390 variables, 154/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 232/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 0/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/390 variables, 0/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 390/390 variables, and 397 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved in 16032 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 232/232 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 28876ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 28881ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 29097 ms. Remains : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:45:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2024-05-30 17:45:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2024-05-30 17:45:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 236 transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:45:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2024-05-30 17:45:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2024-05-30 17:45:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11280862420011143949.gal : 10 ms
[2024-05-30 17:45:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5288541865684886162.ctl : 8 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11280862420011143949.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5288541865684886162.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.55852e+07,2.58895,67268,2,6024,5,332038,6,0,855,237547,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(AX((A(((((Finished_2>=1)||(Finished_3>=1))||((Finished_0>=1)||(Finished_1>=1)))&&(((((((((IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(OpenRequests_5>=1))&&(Idl...14498
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY((Init * !(EG(!(EX(!((!((E(!(((((((((MovetoZ_24>=1)||(MovetoZ_26>=1))||((MovetoZ_28>=1)||(MovetoZ_30>=1)))|...32032
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 120/176/116
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-30 17:45:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-05-30 17:45:39] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-30 17:45:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15724323617301325961.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15724323617301325961.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15724323617301325961.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15724323617301325961.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15724323617301325961.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-30 17:45:39] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-30 17:45:39] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-30 17:45:39] [INFO ] Removed a total of 202 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:45:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 67 ms
[2024-05-30 17:45:39] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 94 labels/synchronizations in 26 ms.
[2024-05-30 17:45:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13235122698687734879.gal : 11 ms
[2024-05-30 17:45:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11181716642299789483.ctl : 11 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13235122698687734879.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11181716642299789483.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.55852e+07,2.99388,71728,2434,1036,67851,6650,449,309761,114,488497,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(AX((A(((((u19.Finished_2>=1)||(u19.Finished_3>=1))||((u19.Finished_0>=1)||(u19.Finished_1>=1)))&&(((((((((i11.u17.IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(i...19134
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY((Init * !(EG(!(EX(!((!((E(!(((((((((i2.u11.MovetoZ_24>=1)||(i2.u4.MovetoZ_26>=1))||((i2.u11.MovetoZ_28>=1)...42120
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
(forward)formula 0,1,20.7126,393016,1,0,765676,23867,2719,898317,555,488497,1510336
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 154 /154 variables (removed 0) and now considering 236/236 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:46:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 17:46:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 17:46:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 17:46:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 246 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 323 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 232 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:46:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/154 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 236/390 variables, 154/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/390 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 390/390 variables, and 165 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved in 12655 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 232/232 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/154 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 236/390 variables, 154/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 232/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 0/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/390 variables, 0/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 390/390 variables, and 397 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved in 15439 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 232/232 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 28380ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 28385ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 28713 ms. Remains : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:46:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2024-05-30 17:46:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-05-30 17:46:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 236 transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:46:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-30 17:46:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2024-05-30 17:46:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3888092777628117604.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 17:46:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18421783683533505596.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3888092777628117604.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18421783683533505596.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.55852e+07,2.61043,67148,2,6024,5,332038,6,0,855,237547,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(!((!(AF((((((((StartSecuring_12>=1)&&(ClientsWaiting_3>=1))||((StartSecuring_2>=1)&&(ClientsWaiting_0>=1)))||(((StartSecuring_7>=1)&&(...9830
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(Init,!(EG(((((ControlRoomDispatch_2>=1)||(ControlRoomDispatch_3>=1))||((ControlRoomDispatch_0>=1)||(Co...17328
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 184/240/52
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 120/239/116
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 216/0/20
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-30 17:46:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-30 17:46:59] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-30 17:46:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13731570711595286786.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13731570711595286786.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13731570711595286786.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13731570711595286786.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13731570711595286786.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-30 17:46:59] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-30 17:46:59] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-30 17:46:59] [INFO ] Removed a total of 211 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:46:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2024-05-30 17:46:59] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 93 labels/synchronizations in 13 ms.
[2024-05-30 17:46:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18123077752653058426.gal : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 17:46:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13450303146765150878.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18123077752653058426.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13450303146765150878.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.55852e+07,1.36982,31608,1225,1325,37063,5724,472,95038,115,153962,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(!((!(AF((((((((i11.u34.StartSecuring_12>=1)&&(i7.u25.ClientsWaiting_3>=1))||((i0.u15.StartSecuring_2>=1)&&(i2.u22.ClientsWaiting_0>=1)...12778
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(Init,!(EG(((((i9.u18.ControlRoomDispatch_2>=1)||(i7.u11.ControlRoomDispatch_3>=1))||((i2.u0.ControlRoo...22402
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Performed 64 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 64
Iterating post reduction 0 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 154 transition count 172
Reduce places removed 64 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 16 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 16 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 80 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 90 transition count 156
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 90 transition count 140
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 176 place count 74 transition count 140
Applied a total of 176 rules in 45 ms. Remains 74 /154 variables (removed 80) and now considering 140/236 (removed 96) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 140 rows 74 cols
[2024-05-30 17:47:30] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-30 17:47:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned [45]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 73 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 73/154 places, 140/236 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 140/140 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 124 ms. Remains : 73/154 places, 140/236 transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:47:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 17:47:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 17:47:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 140 transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:47:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 17:47:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 17:47:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13942888079772270569.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 17:47:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17759042607406414303.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13942888079772270569.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17759042607406414303.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.98131e+06,0.062664,4836,2,655,5,7024,6,0,435,5742,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EG(AF(((((Finished_2>=1)||(Finished_3>=1))||((Finished_0>=1)||(Finished_1>=1)))&&(((ControlRoomDispatch_2>=1)||(ControlRoomDispatch_3>=...1145
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,EG(!(EG(!(((((Finished_2>=1)||(Finished_3>=1))||((Finished_0>=1)||(Finished_1>=1)))&&(((ControlR...1195
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 40/164/100
(forward)formula 0,0,0.488733,14232,1,0,10,65373,37,3,2495,33223,14
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 154 /154 variables (removed 0) and now considering 236/236 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 236 rows 154 cols
[2024-05-30 17:47:30] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 7 ms
[2024-05-30 17:47:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 17:47:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 17:47:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 208 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 289 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 232 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:47:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/154 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 236/390 variables, 154/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/390 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 390/390 variables, and 165 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved in 11333 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 232/232 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/154 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 236/390 variables, 154/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 232/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 0/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/390 variables, 0/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 390/390 variables, and 397 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved in 11359 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 232/232 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 22964ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 22970ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 23263 ms. Remains : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:47:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-30 17:47:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-30 17:47:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 236 transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:47:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-30 17:47:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-30 17:47:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4856406261718203615.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 17:47:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1529895543207187220.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4856406261718203615.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1529895543207187220.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.55852e+07,2.50052,67516,2,6024,5,332038,6,0,855,237547,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(EX((((((Clients_0>=1)||(Clients_1>=1))||((Clients_2>=1)||(Clients_3>=1))) * (((((EG((((((((MovetoZ_24>=1)||(MovetoZ_26>=1))||((MovetoZ...13350
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(!((E(!(EG(!(((E(TRUE U ((((((NumClientsReq>=1)&&(DoSecuring_9>=1))||((NumClientsReq>=1)&&(DoSec...18513
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 184/240/52
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-30 17:48:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-30 17:48:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-30 17:48:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15472292752303813014.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15472292752303813014.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15472292752303813014.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15472292752303813014.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15472292752303813014.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-30 17:48:24] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-30 17:48:24] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-30 17:48:24] [INFO ] Removed a total of 212 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:48:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2024-05-30 17:48:24] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 98 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2024-05-30 17:48:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6432473796239601606.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 17:48:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9715009514649541387.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6432473796239601606.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9715009514649541387.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.55852e+07,6.81878,161824,4475,1267,269574,6738,496,496783,114,509114,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(EX((((((u19.Clients_0>=1)||(u19.Clients_1>=1))||((u19.Clients_2>=1)||(u19.Clients_3>=1))) * (((((EG((((((((i9.i0.u14.MovetoZ_24>=1)||(...17771
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(!((E(!(EG(!(((E(TRUE U ((((((u19.NumClientsReq>=1)&&(i1.u32.DoSecuring_9>=1))||((u19.NumClients...24472
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 154 /154 variables (removed 0) and now considering 236/236 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:48:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 17:48:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 83 ms returned [125]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 85 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 153/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 153 /153 variables (removed 0) and now considering 236/236 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 92 ms. Remains : 153/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:48:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-30 17:48:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2024-05-30 17:48:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 236 transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:48:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2024-05-30 17:48:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2024-05-30 17:48:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14364659872259737851.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 17:48:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13524425919273482843.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14364659872259737851.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13524425919273482843.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.55852e+07,2.55177,64484,2,5060,5,315642,6,0,851,222174,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(!(A(EF((((((((((IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(OpenRequests_5>=1))&&(Idles>=1))||(((IdleTechs_2>=1)&&(OpenRequests_8>=1))&&(Idles>=1)))||((((IdleT...10225
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((Init * E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(!(!(EG(!((((Clients_0>=1)||(Clients_1>=1))||((Clients_2>=1)||(Clients_3>=1))))))...14492
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,10.1523,224892,1,0,10,1.36701e+06,26,2,4508,609710,13
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 154 /154 variables (removed 0) and now considering 236/236 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:49:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 17:49:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 165 ms returned [124, 125]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 166 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 152/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 152 /152 variables (removed 0) and now considering 236/236 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 173 ms. Remains : 152/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:49:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-30 17:49:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-30 17:49:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 236 transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:49:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-30 17:49:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-30 17:49:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3118832115274017418.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 17:49:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8576565679749776870.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3118832115274017418.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8576565679749776870.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.55852e+07,0.505431,14148,2,1231,5,49013,6,0,847,46141,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EG((AF((((((Assigned_8<1)&&(Assigned_9<1))&&((Assigned_10<1)&&(Assigned_11<1)))&&(((Assigned_12<1)&&(Assigned_13<1))&&((Assigned_15<1...2144
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(!(EG(!((((((Assigned_8<1)&&(Assigned_9<1))&&((Assigned_10<1)&&(Assigned_11<1)))&&(((Assi...2499
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,3.53435,93012,1,0,13,435158,25,6,3845,487972,12
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 154 /154 variables (removed 0) and now considering 236/236 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:49:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 17:49:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 90 ms returned [125]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 91 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 153/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 153 /153 variables (removed 0) and now considering 236/236 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 95 ms. Remains : 153/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:49:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 17:49:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 17:49:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 236 transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:49:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 17:49:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 17:49:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5167462621060981184.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 17:49:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10756125568276902611.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5167462621060981184.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10756125568276902611.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.55852e+07,2.33597,65200,2,5060,5,315642,6,0,851,222174,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E((AF(EG((((ControlRoomDispatch_2>=1)||(ControlRoomDispatch_3>=1))||((ControlRoomDispatch_0>=1)||(ControlRoomDispatch_1>=1))))) + !(AF(...6532
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,(!(EG(!(EG((((ControlRoomDispatch_2>=1)||(ControlRoomDispatch_3>=1))||((ControlRoomDispatch_0>=1...6596
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-30 17:49:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 17:49:38] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-30 17:49:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5948261575615839111.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5948261575615839111.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5948261575615839111.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5948261575615839111.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5948261575615839111.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-30 17:49:38] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-30 17:49:38] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-30 17:49:38] [INFO ] Removed a total of 217 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:49:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-05-30 17:49:38] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 91 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2024-05-30 17:49:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2123092648029626826.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 17:49:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5929748205528517924.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2123092648029626826.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5929748205528517924.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.55852e+07,0.957108,22804,1244,161,42244,1376,434,47298,87,12596,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E((AF(EG((((i0.u9.ControlRoomDispatch_2>=1)||(i7.u11.ControlRoomDispatch_3>=1))||((i6.u5.ControlRoomDispatch_0>=1)||(i1.u14.ControlRoom...8638
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,(!(EG(!(EG((((i0.u9.ControlRoomDispatch_2>=1)||(i7.u11.ControlRoomDispatch_3>=1))||((i6.u5.Contr...8702
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,10.1996,290924,1,0,700585,4155,2746,520086,436,25610,1465474
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Performed 64 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 64
Iterating post reduction 0 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 154 transition count 172
Reduce places removed 64 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 16 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 16 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 80 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 90 transition count 156
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 90 transition count 140
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 176 place count 74 transition count 140
Applied a total of 176 rules in 29 ms. Remains 74 /154 variables (removed 80) and now considering 140/236 (removed 96) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 140 rows 74 cols
[2024-05-30 17:49:49] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-30 17:49:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 17:49:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 17:49:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 90 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 156 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-30 17:49:49] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 4 ms returned []
Running 136 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:49:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/74 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 140/214 variables, 74/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/214 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 214/214 variables, and 85 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved in 3107 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 74/74 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 136/136 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/74 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 140/214 variables, 74/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 136/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/214 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 214/214 variables, and 221 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved in 3986 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 74/74 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 136/136 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 7199ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 136 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7201ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 74/154 places, 140/236 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7397 ms. Remains : 74/154 places, 140/236 transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:49:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 17:49:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 17:49:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 140 transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:49:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 17:49:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 17:49:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15169655427004344407.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 17:49:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6612538092543643458.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15169655427004344407.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6612538092543643458.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.98131e+06,0.100907,6220,2,1064,5,14783,6,0,439,11438,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A(((((((Finished_2>=1)||(Finished_3>=1))||((Finished_0>=1)||(Finished_1>=1)))||(((((IdleTechs_1>=1)&&(OpenRequests_9>=1))&&(Idles>=1))...2490
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!((!(!(E(TRUE U !((((Clients_0>=1)||(Clients_1>=1))||((Clients_2>=1)||(Clients_3>=1))))))) + (!(...5578
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.600402,14912,1,0,7,62176,28,1,2551,30715,13
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 64 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 64 transitions
Performed 64 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 64
Iterating post reduction 0 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 154 transition count 172
Reduce places removed 64 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 16 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 16 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 80 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 90 transition count 156
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 90 transition count 140
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 176 place count 74 transition count 140
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 179 place count 71 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 182 place count 71 transition count 92
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 191 place count 66 transition count 88
Applied a total of 191 rules in 32 ms. Remains 66 /154 variables (removed 88) and now considering 88/236 (removed 148) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 88 rows 66 cols
[2024-05-30 17:49:57] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 17:49:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 117 ms returned [40]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 118 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 65/154 places, 88/236 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 16 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 16 transitions
Performed 16 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 65 transition count 72
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 49 transition count 72
Applied a total of 32 rules in 6 ms. Remains 49 /65 variables (removed 16) and now considering 72/88 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 49 cols
[2024-05-30 17:49:57] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 17:49:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 17:49:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 17:49:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 99 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 151 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 49/154 places, 72/236 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 308 ms. Remains : 49/154 places, 72/236 transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:49:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 17:49:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 17:49:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 72 transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:49:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 17:49:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 17:49:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3245678468220653514.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 17:49:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1398514965755439568.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3245678468220653514.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1398514965755439568.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,50625,0.022482,3892,2,192,5,900,6,0,271,587,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF(((((((NumClientsReq<1)||(DoSecuring_9<1))&&((NumClientsReq<1)||(DoSecuring_10<1)))&&(((NumClientsReq<1)||(DoSecuring_11<1))&&((NumC...684
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(((((((NumClientsReq<1)||(DoSecuring_9<1))&&((NumClientsReq<1)||(DoSecuring_10<1)))&&(((NumClie...733
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.141656,6324,1,0,40,16875,23,27,1292,14229,34
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 106 transition count 188
Iterating global reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 106 transition count 188
Applied a total of 96 rules in 6 ms. Remains 106 /154 variables (removed 48) and now considering 188/236 (removed 48) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 188 rows 106 cols
[2024-05-30 17:49:57] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-30 17:49:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 17:49:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 17:49:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 139 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 194 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 184 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:49:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/106 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 188/294 variables, 106/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/294 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 294/294 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved in 7959 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 106/106 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 184/184 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/106 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 188/294 variables, 106/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 184/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 0/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/294 variables, 0/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 294/294 variables, and 301 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved in 9400 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 106/106 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 184/184 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 17608ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 17612ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 106/154 places, 188/236 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 17813 ms. Remains : 106/154 places, 188/236 transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:50:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 17:50:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 17:50:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 188 transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:50:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-30 17:50:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 17:50:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4862292830119494724.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 17:50:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6485821082651866955.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4862292830119494724.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6485821082651866955.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.61997e+07,0.926641,28260,2,3824,5,111898,6,0,615,111186,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!((((((Clients_0>=1)||(Clients_1>=1))||((Clients_2>=1)||(Clients_3>=1))) * (!(EG((((((Assigned_8>=1)||(Assigned_9>=1))||((Assigned_10>=...4634
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U EX(!(EX(!(((((((StartSecuring_5>=1)&&(ClientsTimeout_1>=1))||((StartSecuring_12>=1)&&(...15221
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,3.72489,88236,1,0,9,500225,24,2,3333,216489,9
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 154 /154 variables (removed 0) and now considering 236/236 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 236 rows 154 cols
[2024-05-30 17:50:19] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-30 17:50:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 78 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 17:50:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 17:50:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 241 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 323 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 232 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:50:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/154 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 236/390 variables, 154/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/390 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 390/390 variables, and 165 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved in 12049 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 232/232 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/154 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 236/390 variables, 154/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 232/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 0/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/390 variables, 0/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 390/390 variables, and 397 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved in 14992 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 232/232 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 27299ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 27304ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 27630 ms. Remains : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:50:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 17:50:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 17:50:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 236 transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:50:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-30 17:50:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 17:50:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11285787601786262170.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 17:50:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2689119209878014126.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11285787601786262170.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2689119209878014126.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.55852e+07,2.49106,67404,2,6024,5,332038,6,0,855,237547,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E((((((((MovetoZ_24>=1)||(MovetoZ_26>=1))||((MovetoZ_28>=1)||(MovetoZ_30>=1)))||(((MovetoZ_32>=1)||(MovetoZ_34>=1))||((MovetoZ_36>=1)||...2847
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,(((((((MovetoZ_24>=1)||(MovetoZ_26>=1))||((MovetoZ_28>=1)||(MovetoZ_30>=1)))||(((MovetoZ_32>=1)||(M...4307
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 108/0/128
(forward)formula 0,0,21.1961,493984,1,0,9,2.9313e+06,31,2,4557,1.42184e+06,12
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 106 transition count 188
Iterating global reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 106 transition count 188
Applied a total of 96 rules in 7 ms. Remains 106 /154 variables (removed 48) and now considering 188/236 (removed 48) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 188 rows 106 cols
[2024-05-30 17:51:08] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-30 17:51:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 17:51:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 17:51:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 139 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 194 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 184 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:51:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/106 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 188/294 variables, 106/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/294 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 294/294 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved in 7864 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 106/106 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 184/184 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/106 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 188/294 variables, 106/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 184/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 0/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/294 variables, 0/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 294/294 variables, and 301 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved in 10436 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 106/106 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 184/184 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 18513ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 18517ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 106/154 places, 188/236 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 18719 ms. Remains : 106/154 places, 188/236 transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:51:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 17:51:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 17:51:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 188 transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:51:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 17:51:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 17:51:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13010196605295223253.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 17:51:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2761518818391247632.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13010196605295223253.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2761518818391247632.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.61997e+07,1.02071,28036,2,3824,5,111898,6,0,615,111186,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(A((!(E((((ControlRoomDispatch_2>=1)||(ControlRoomDispatch_3>=1))||((ControlRoomDispatch_0>=1)||(ControlRoomDispatch_1>=1))) U EF((((((...5324
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU((FwdU(EY(Init),!(!(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!(((((((StartSecuring_5>=1)&&(ClientsTimeout_1>=1))||((StartSecur...7063
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,3.91072,87184,1,0,8,439268,25,1,3488,282816,12
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 64 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 64 transitions
Performed 64 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 64
Iterating post reduction 0 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 154 transition count 172
Reduce places removed 64 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 16 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 16 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 80 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 90 transition count 156
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 90 transition count 140
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 176 place count 74 transition count 140
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 179 place count 71 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 182 place count 71 transition count 92
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 194 place count 59 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 206 place count 59 transition count 80
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 218 place count 47 transition count 56
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 47 transition count 56
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 242 place count 35 transition count 44
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 35 transition count 44
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 266 place count 35 transition count 32
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 266 place count 35 transition count 28
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 274 place count 31 transition count 28
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 282 place count 27 transition count 24
Applied a total of 282 rules in 18 ms. Remains 27 /154 variables (removed 127) and now considering 24/236 (removed 212) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 24 rows 27 cols
[2024-05-30 17:51:31] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-30 17:51:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned [0, 9, 10]
[2024-05-30 17:51:31] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [0, 10]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 45 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 25/154 places, 24/236 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 25 /25 variables (removed 0) and now considering 24/24 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 64 ms. Remains : 25/154 places, 24/236 transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:51:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 17:51:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 17:51:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 24 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 38 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (7 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2024-05-30 17:51:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 17:51:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2024-05-30 17:51:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality18294628762832300877.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 17:51:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16107349478647211534.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality18294628762832300877.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16107349478647211534.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 106 transition count 188
Iterating global reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 106 transition count 188
Applied a total of 96 rules in 5 ms. Remains 106 /154 variables (removed 48) and now considering 188/236 (removed 48) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 188 rows 106 cols
[2024-05-30 17:51:31] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 17:51:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned [77]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 57 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 105/154 places, 188/236 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 188/188 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 64 ms. Remains : 105/154 places, 188/236 transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:51:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 17:51:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 17:51:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 188 transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:51:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 17:51:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 17:51:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13537331020204419866.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 17:51:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1552669904533295162.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13537331020204419866.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1552669904533295162.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.61997e+07,0.742661,19692,2,2033,5,72654,6,0,611,79379,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(EX(((((((StartSecuring_5<1)||(ClientsTimeout_1<1))&&((StartSecuring_12<1)||(ClientsTimeout_3<1)))&&(((StartSecuring_15<1)||(ClientsTi...10160
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(((((((StartSecuring_5<1)||(ClientsTimeout_1<1))&&((StartSecuring_12<1)||(ClientsT...10234
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,4.50346,105028,1,0,37,628162,22,22,3542,332779,31
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 154 /154 variables (removed 0) and now considering 236/236 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 236 rows 154 cols
[2024-05-30 17:51:35] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-30 17:51:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned [125]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 69 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 153/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 153 /153 variables (removed 0) and now considering 236/236 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 73 ms. Remains : 153/154 places, 236/236 transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:51:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 17:51:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 17:51:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 236 transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:51:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-30 17:51:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-30 17:51:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16162703500134598902.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 17:51:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5078288741116229895.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16162703500134598902.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5078288741116229895.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.55852e+07,2.74613,63796,2,5060,5,315642,6,0,851,222174,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG(((AX((((((((IdleTechs_1<1)||(OpenRequests_9<1))||(Idles<1))&&(((IdleTechs_0<1)||(OpenRequests_12<1))||(Idles<1)))&&((((IdleTechs_3<...3044
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(((!(EX(!((((((((IdleTechs_1<1)||(OpenRequests_9<1))||(Idles<1))&&(((IdleTechs_0<1)||(O...3334
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 212/72/24
(forward)formula 0,0,24.6766,551228,1,0,15,3.1566e+06,33,6,5139,1.96508e+06,18
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2024-05-30 17:52:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-30 17:52:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-30 17:52:00] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-30 17:52:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16729601956259590199.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16729601956259590199.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16729601956259590199.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16729601956259590199.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16729601956259590199.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-30 17:52:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-30 17:52:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-30 17:52:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 203 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-30 17:52:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2024-05-30 17:52:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 119 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2024-05-30 17:52:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9878390517052179553.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 17:52:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1108523224317313629.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9878390517052179553.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1108523224317313629.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 2 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.55852e+07,3.68439,72320,1807,1296,80184,6745,496,265457,117,451278,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(!((!(AF((((((((i6.u23.StartSecuring_12>=1)&&(i6.u23.ClientsWaiting_3>=1))||((i1.u24.StartSecuring_2>=1)&&(i0.i1.u22.ClientsWaiting_0>=...13103
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(Init,!(EG(((((i2.u6.ControlRoomDispatch_2>=1)||(i6.u16.ControlRoomDispatch_3>=1))||((i0.i0.u0.ControlR...22975
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
(forward)formula 0,0,71.144,1171108,1,0,2.18356e+06,38129,3115,2.64223e+06,596,686206,3155408
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: (A(EX((((((u19.Clients_0>=1)||(u19.Clients_1>=1))||((u19.Clients_2>=1)||(u19.Clients_3>=1))) * (((((EG((((((((i4.u12.MovetoZ_24>=1)||(i4....17828
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(!((E(!(EG(!(((E(TRUE U ((((((u19.NumClientsReq>=1)&&(i5.i1.u29.DoSecuring_9>=1))||((u19.NumClie...24553
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
(forward)formula 1,1,80.2606,1300700,1,0,2.43794e+06,46623,3330,2.88287e+06,597,713629,3539889
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Total runtime 553952 ms.

BK_STOP 1717091601481

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N04"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N04, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r444-smll-171701110800114"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N04.tgz
mv UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N04 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;