Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r444-smll-171701110600058.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N06, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r444-smll-171701110600058
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 552K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K Apr 13 05:27 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 113K Apr 13 05:27 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.8K Apr 13 05:24 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 46K Apr 13 05:24 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.0K Apr 23 08:04 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 23K Apr 23 08:04 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.7K Apr 23 08:04 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 23 08:04 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Apr 13 05:37 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 145K Apr 13 05:37 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K Apr 13 05:34 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 85K Apr 13 05:34 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.0K Apr 23 08:04 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.0K Apr 23 08:04 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N06-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N06-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N06-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N06-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N06-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N06-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N06-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N06-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N06-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N06-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N06-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N06-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N06-CTLFireability-2024-12
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N06-CTLFireability-2024-13
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N06-CTLFireability-2024-14
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N06-CTLFireability-2024-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1717073945277

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N06
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is COL
CTLFireability COL
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-30 12:59:07] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-30 12:59:07] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-30 12:59:08] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2024-05-30 12:59:08] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2024-05-30 12:59:09] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 1326 ms
[2024-05-30 12:59:09] [INFO ] Imported 13 HL places and 12 HL transitions for a total of 106 PT places and 162.0 transition bindings in 35 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 53 ms.
[2024-05-30 12:59:09] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 13 places and 12 transitions 37 arcs in 8 ms.
[2024-05-30 12:59:09] [INFO ] Skeletonized 16 HLPN properties in 5 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Remains 11 properties that can be checked using skeleton over-approximation.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 1 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 14 to 13
RANDOM walk for 638 steps (0 resets) in 67 ms. (9 steps per ms) remains 0/13 properties
[2024-05-30 12:59:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 38 ms
[2024-05-30 12:59:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Transition timeout forces synchronizations/join behavior on parameter c of sort Cli
Domain [Cli(6), Z(2), Z(2)] of place MovetoZ breaks symmetries in sort Z
[2024-05-30 12:59:10] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 106 places and 162 transitions 510 arcs in 47 ms.
[2024-05-30 12:59:10] [INFO ] Unfolded 16 HLPN properties in 1 ms.
[2024-05-30 12:59:10] [INFO ] Reduced 6 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-30 12:59:10] [INFO ] Reduced 6 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-30 12:59:10] [INFO ] Reduced 6 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-30 12:59:10] [INFO ] Reduced 6 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-30 12:59:10] [INFO ] Reduced 6 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-30 12:59:10] [INFO ] Reduced 6 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-30 12:59:10] [INFO ] Reduced 6 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-30 12:59:10] [INFO ] Reduced 6 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-30 12:59:10] [INFO ] Reduced 6 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-30 12:59:10] [INFO ] Reduced 6 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-30 12:59:10] [INFO ] Reduced 6 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-30 12:59:10] [INFO ] Reduced 6 identical enabling conditions.
Ensure Unique test removed 24 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 24 transitions.
Support contains 106 out of 106 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 138/138 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 15 ms. Remains 106 /106 variables (removed 0) and now considering 138/138 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 138 rows 106 cols
[2024-05-30 12:59:10] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 31 ms
[2024-05-30 12:59:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 321 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 12:59:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:59:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 203 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 601 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 132 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:59:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 6/106 variables, 13/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 138/244 variables, 106/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/244 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 244/244 variables, and 121 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved in 5452 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 106/106 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 132/132 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 6/106 variables, 13/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 138/244 variables, 106/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 132/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/244 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 244/244 variables, and 253 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved in 4878 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 106/106 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 132/132 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 10617ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10646ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11292 ms. Remains : 106/106 places, 138/138 transitions.
Support contains 106 out of 106 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-30 12:59:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2024-05-30 12:59:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 38 ms
[2024-05-30 12:59:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 138 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 23 to 20
RANDOM walk for 3647 steps (0 resets) in 234 ms. (15 steps per ms) remains 0/20 properties
[2024-05-30 12:59:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2024-05-30 12:59:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
[2024-05-30 12:59:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 138 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 138/138 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 94 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 94 transition count 126
Applied a total of 24 rules in 11 ms. Remains 94 /106 variables (removed 12) and now considering 126/138 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 126 rows 94 cols
[2024-05-30 12:59:22] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-05-30 12:59:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 81 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 12:59:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:59:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 108 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 191 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 120 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:59:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 6/94 variables, 13/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 126/220 variables, 94/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 220/220 variables, and 109 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 3506 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 94/94 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 6/94 variables, 13/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 126/220 variables, 94/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 120/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 220/220 variables, and 229 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 3432 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 94/94 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 7033ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7037ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 94/106 places, 126/138 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7240 ms. Remains : 94/106 places, 126/138 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:59:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-30 12:59:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-30 12:59:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 126 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:59:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-30 12:59:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-30 12:59:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6211757083462410484.gal : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 12:59:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8536753766244940417.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6211757083462410484.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8536753766244940417.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.82423e+07,0.270245,11140,2,3557,5,44398,6,0,505,28053,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(!(A(!(A((((((Assigned_0>=1)||(Assigned_1>=1))||((Assigned_2>=1)||(Assigned_3>=1)))||(((Assigned_4>=1)||(Assigned_5>=1))||((Assigned_6>...1600
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((((((NumClientsReq>=1)&&(DoSecuring_11>=1))||((NumClientsReq>=1)&&(DoSecuring...4406
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 54/0/72
(forward)formula 0,1,3.05655,85380,1,0,9,506744,30,2,2802,246582,14
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N06-CTLFireability-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 138/138 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 94 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 94 transition count 126
Applied a total of 24 rules in 4 ms. Remains 94 /106 variables (removed 12) and now considering 126/138 (removed 12) transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:59:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:59:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 12:59:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:59:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 137 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 208 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 120 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:59:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 6/94 variables, 13/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 126/220 variables, 94/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 220/220 variables, and 109 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 3671 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 94/94 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 6/94 variables, 13/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 126/220 variables, 94/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 120/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 220/220 variables, and 229 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 4767 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 94/94 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 8518ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8521ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 94/106 places, 126/138 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8735 ms. Remains : 94/106 places, 126/138 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:59:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2024-05-30 12:59:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-30 12:59:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 126 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:59:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-30 12:59:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-30 12:59:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15493956250479608297.gal : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 12:59:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13440094695552010843.ctl : 8 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15493956250479608297.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13440094695552010843.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.82423e+07,0.40278,11200,2,3557,5,44398,6,0,505,28053,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(EX(EF(AG(((((Finished_5>=1)||(Finished_4>=1))||((Finished_1>=1)||(Finished_0>=1)))||((Finished_3>=1)||(Finished_2>=1))))))) U !(((EF(...12277
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,!(EX(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((((Finished_5>=1)||(Finished_4>=1))||((Finished_1>=1)||(Finished_0>=1)...12539
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 84/0/42
(forward)formula 0,0,4.72242,114124,1,0,17,708927,50,5,2922,358743,19
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N06-CTLFireability-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 138/138 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 94 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 94 transition count 126
Applied a total of 24 rules in 5 ms. Remains 94 /106 variables (removed 12) and now considering 126/138 (removed 12) transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:59:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:59:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 90 ms returned [63]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 92 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 93/106 places, 126/138 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 93 /93 variables (removed 0) and now considering 126/126 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 100 ms. Remains : 93/106 places, 126/138 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:59:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 12:59:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 12:59:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 126 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:59:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 12:59:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 12:59:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9097843609689717418.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 12:59:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6613828137532205364.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9097843609689717418.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6613828137532205364.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.82423e+07,0.228052,7988,2,1970,5,24600,6,0,501,18549,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((AF(EG(!(E(((((ControlRoomDispatch_1>=1)||(ControlRoomDispatch_0>=1))||((ControlRoomDispatch_3>=1)||(ControlRoomDispatch_2>=1)))||((Co...1137
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(EY(Init),!(EG(!(E(((((ControlRoomDispatch_1>=1)||(ControlRoomDispatch_0>=1))||((ControlRoomDispatch_3>=1)...1221
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 108/0/18
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,5.7096,123840,1,0,14,829138,39,3,2957,449810,17
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N06-CTLFireability-2024-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 138/138 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 94 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 94 transition count 126
Applied a total of 24 rules in 7 ms. Remains 94 /106 variables (removed 12) and now considering 126/138 (removed 12) transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:59:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:59:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 115 ms returned [63]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 117 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 93/106 places, 126/138 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 93 /93 variables (removed 0) and now considering 126/126 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 128 ms. Remains : 93/106 places, 126/138 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:59:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 12:59:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 12:59:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 126 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:59:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 12:59:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 12:59:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6123867376539818641.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 12:59:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2793171065332965798.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6123867376539818641.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2793171065332965798.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.82423e+07,0.18723,8252,2,1970,5,24600,6,0,501,18549,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG(EX(EX(((((Clients_0>=1)||(Clients_1>=1))||((Clients_2>=1)||(Clients_3>=1)))||((Clients_4>=1)||(Clients_5>=1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),EX(EX(((((Clients_0>=1)||(Clients_1>=1))||((Clients_2>=1)||(Clients_3>=1)))||((Clients_4>=1)||(Cl...181
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,2.7954,74836,1,0,70,350483,16,61,2352,420093,72
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N06-CTLFireability-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 138/138 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 24 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 24 transitions
Performed 24 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 24
Iterating post reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 106 transition count 114
Reduce places removed 24 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 82 transition count 102
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 82 transition count 90
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 70 transition count 90
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 85 place count 69 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 69 transition count 78
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 62 transition count 72
Applied a total of 99 rules in 39 ms. Remains 62 /106 variables (removed 44) and now considering 72/138 (removed 66) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 62 cols
[2024-05-30 12:59:55] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-30 12:59:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 12:59:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:59:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 93 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 161 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-30 12:59:55] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 66 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:59:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 6/62 variables, 13/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 72/134 variables, 62/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 134/134 variables, and 76 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved in 1867 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 66/66 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 6/62 variables, 13/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 72/134 variables, 62/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 66/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 134/134 variables, and 142 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved in 1918 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 66/66 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3809ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3811ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/106 places, 72/138 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4019 ms. Remains : 62/106 places, 72/138 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:59:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 12:59:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 12:59:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 72 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:59:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 12:59:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 12:59:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11043724917245092881.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 12:59:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8914700765046929722.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11043724917245092881.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8914700765046929722.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.01924e+06,0.038518,4212,2,641,5,3548,6,0,323,2072,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF(((((((NumClientsReq<1)||(DoSecuring_11<1))&&((NumClientsReq<1)||(DoSecuring_10<1)))&&(((NumClientsReq<1)||(DoSecuring_9<1))&&((NumC...516
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(((((((NumClientsReq<1)||(DoSecuring_11<1))&&((NumClientsReq<1)||(DoSecuring_10<1)))&&(((...568
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 30/0/42
(forward)formula 0,0,0.19598,7908,1,0,6,25121,20,0,1632,10591,8
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N06-CTLFireability-2024-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 138/138 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 106 /106 variables (removed 0) and now considering 138/138 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 138 rows 106 cols
[2024-05-30 12:59:59] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-30 13:00:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 121 ms returned [75]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 122 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 105/106 places, 138/138 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 138/138 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 129 ms. Remains : 105/106 places, 138/138 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:00:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-30 13:00:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-30 13:00:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 138 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:00:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-30 13:00:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-30 13:00:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1551891391345087711.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 13:00:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16170824861728914267.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1551891391345087711.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16170824861728914267.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.7622e+07,0.288474,9384,2,2249,5,31874,6,0,561,23633,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((!(A((((((((((IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(OpenRequests_8>=1))&&(Idles>=1))||(((IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(OpenRequests_6>=1))&&(Idles>=1)))||((((IdleTechs_...10690
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((Init * !((!(!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((EX((((((((IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(OpenRequests_2>=1))&&(Idles>=1))||(((IdleTech...45263
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,7.38619,169028,1,0,18,1.15131e+06,36,6,3061,664985,15
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N06-CTLFireability-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 138/138 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 106 /106 variables (removed 0) and now considering 138/138 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:00:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 13:00:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 75 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 13:00:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 13:00:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 125 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 204 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-30 13:00:07] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 8 ms returned []
Running 132 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:00:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 6/106 variables, 13/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 138/244 variables, 106/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/244 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 244/244 variables, and 121 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved in 5201 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 106/106 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 132/132 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 6/106 variables, 13/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 138/244 variables, 106/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 132/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/244 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 244/244 variables, and 253 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved in 6348 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 106/106 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 132/132 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 11657ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11661ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11886 ms. Remains : 106/106 places, 138/138 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:00:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-30 13:00:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-30 13:00:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 138 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:00:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-30 13:00:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-30 13:00:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10707387236245872175.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 13:00:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4395192815633522128.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10707387236245872175.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4395192815633522128.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.7622e+07,0.560735,14440,2,4244,5,63681,6,0,565,38333,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A((!(E((((((Finished_5>=1)||(Finished_4>=1))||((Finished_1>=1)||(Finished_0>=1)))||(((Finished_3>=1)||(Finished_2>=1))||((ControlRoomD...2813
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!(EG(((((ClientsWaiting_1>=1)||(ClientsWaiting_0>=1))||((ClientsWaiting_3>=1)||(ClientsWaiting_2...4584
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 90/0/48
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 102/0/36
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 72/72/66
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 120/0/18
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-30 13:00:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 13:00:49] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-30 13:00:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7761567973071938882.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7761567973071938882.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7761567973071938882.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7761567973071938882.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7761567973071938882.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-30 13:00:49] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-30 13:00:49] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-30 13:00:49] [INFO ] Removed a total of 129 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:00:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 45 ms
[2024-05-30 13:00:49] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 84 labels/synchronizations in 17 ms.
[2024-05-30 13:00:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5433457495828724241.gal : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 13:00:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14819408446940559944.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5433457495828724241.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14819408446940559944.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.7622e+07,0.092314,7012,328,64,5555,354,392,18074,47,2689,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A((!(E((((((i2.i0.u4.Finished_5>=1)||(i1.i1.u3.Finished_4>=1))||((i3.i1.u1.Finished_1>=1)||(i5.u0.Finished_0>=1)))||(((i0.i1.u26.Finis...4046
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!(EG(((((i3.i1.u28.ClientsWaiting_1>=1)||(i5.u27.ClientsWaiting_0>=1))||((i0.i1.u32.ClientsWaiti...6607
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,22.7774,348472,1,0,387101,2680,1969,2.72514e+06,219,18488,317342
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N06-CTLFireability-2024-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 138/138 transitions.
Performed 24 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 24
Iterating post reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 106 transition count 114
Reduce places removed 24 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 82 transition count 102
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 82 transition count 90
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 70 transition count 90
Applied a total of 84 rules in 11 ms. Remains 70 /106 variables (removed 36) and now considering 90/138 (removed 48) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 70 cols
[2024-05-30 13:01:12] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 13:01:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 13:01:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 107 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 170 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-30 13:01:12] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 84 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:01:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 6/70 variables, 13/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 90/160 variables, 70/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/160 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 160/160 variables, and 85 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved in 2251 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 70/70 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 84/84 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 6/70 variables, 13/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 90/160 variables, 70/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 84/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/160 variables, 0/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 160/160 variables, and 169 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved in 2821 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 70/70 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 84/84 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5122ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5123ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 70/106 places, 90/138 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5314 ms. Remains : 70/106 places, 90/138 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:01:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 90 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:01:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14248150509773815311.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6046989349036948492.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14248150509773815311.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6046989349036948492.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.33919e+06,0.095107,5168,2,1312,5,9409,6,0,373,6320,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((((E(EF(((((((NumClientsReq>=1)&&(DoSecuring_11>=1))||((NumClientsReq>=1)&&(DoSecuring_10>=1)))||(((NumClientsReq>=1)&&(DoSecuring_9>=...2225
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(((E(E(TRUE U ((((((NumClientsReq>=1)&&(DoSecuring_11>=1))||((NumClientsReq>=1)&&(DoSecuring_10>=1)))...2292
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.619509,16984,1,0,16,80011,34,5,2011,46358,17
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N06-CTLFireability-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 138/138 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 106 /106 variables (removed 0) and now considering 138/138 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 138 rows 106 cols
[2024-05-30 13:01:18] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 13:01:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 13:01:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 127 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 184 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 132 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:01:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 6/106 variables, 13/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 138/244 variables, 106/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/244 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 244/244 variables, and 121 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved in 5394 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 106/106 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 132/132 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 6/106 variables, 13/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 138/244 variables, 106/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 132/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/244 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 244/244 variables, and 253 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved in 5616 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 106/106 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 132/132 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 11102ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11106ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11292 ms. Remains : 106/106 places, 138/138 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:01:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 138 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:01:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11320080595278803647.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9588076269791244399.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11320080595278803647.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9588076269791244399.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.7622e+07,0.592383,14468,2,4244,5,63681,6,0,565,38333,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF((EX(!(A((((((((IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(OpenRequests_2>=1))&&(Idles>=1))||(((IdleTechs_1>=1)&&(OpenRequests_9>=1))&&(Idles>=1)))||((((IdleTe...3604
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * EX(!(!((E(!(((((((StartSecuring_8>=1)&&(ClientsTimeout_4>=1))||((StartSecuring_4>=1)&&(Cli...7129
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 66/0/72
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 96/234/42
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/3
(forward)formula 0,1,7.56172,174244,1,0,15,1.05846e+06,34,5,3279,639019,15
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N06-CTLFireability-2024-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 138/138 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 94 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 94 transition count 126
Applied a total of 24 rules in 7 ms. Remains 94 /106 variables (removed 12) and now considering 126/138 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 126 rows 94 cols
[2024-05-30 13:01:37] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 7 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 125 ms returned [63]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 127 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 93/106 places, 126/138 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 93 /93 variables (removed 0) and now considering 126/126 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 139 ms. Remains : 93/106 places, 126/138 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:01:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 126 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:01:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2663790600552823180.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5317109295407364314.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2663790600552823180.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5317109295407364314.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.82423e+07,0.244199,8016,2,1970,5,24600,6,0,501,18549,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((((((((IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(OpenRequests_2>=1))&&(Idles>=1))||(((IdleTechs_1>=1)&&(OpenRequests_9>=1))&&(Idles>=1)))||((((IdleTechs_0>=1)&...948
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EG(EX(EG(!(EG(!((((((Assigned_0>=1)||(Assigned_1>=1))||((Assigned_2>=1)||(Assigned_3>=1)))||(((...1527
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,2.69163,61172,1,0,6,405293,30,1,2418,168622,6
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N06-CTLFireability-2024-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 138/138 transitions.
Performed 24 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 24
Iterating post reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 106 transition count 114
Reduce places removed 24 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 82 transition count 102
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 82 transition count 90
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 70 transition count 90
Applied a total of 84 rules in 25 ms. Remains 70 /106 variables (removed 36) and now considering 90/138 (removed 48) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 70 cols
[2024-05-30 13:01:40] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 13:01:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 13:01:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 148 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 210 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-30 13:01:40] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 84 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:01:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 6/70 variables, 13/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 90/160 variables, 70/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/160 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 160/160 variables, and 85 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved in 2414 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 70/70 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 84/84 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 6/70 variables, 13/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 90/160 variables, 70/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 84/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/160 variables, 0/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 160/160 variables, and 169 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved in 2831 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 70/70 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 84/84 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5283ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5285ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 70/106 places, 90/138 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5528 ms. Remains : 70/106 places, 90/138 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:01:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 90 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:01:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12058469959614689739.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2602856656495940401.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12058469959614689739.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2602856656495940401.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.33919e+06,0.094645,5172,2,1312,5,9409,6,0,373,6320,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AF(!(((((((((IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(OpenRequests_8>=1))&&(Idles>=1))||(((IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(OpenRequests_6>=1))&&(Idles>=1)))||((((IdleTechs_...2112
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,!(EG(!(!(((((((((IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(OpenRequests_8>=1))&&(Idles>=1))||(((IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(OpenRe...2168
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,1.89004,39600,1,0,46,232021,37,30,2064,134353,55
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N06-CTLFireability-2024-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 138/138 transitions.
Performed 24 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 24
Iterating post reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 106 transition count 114
Reduce places removed 24 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 82 transition count 102
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 82 transition count 90
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 70 transition count 90
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 64 transition count 84
Applied a total of 96 rules in 20 ms. Remains 64 /106 variables (removed 42) and now considering 84/138 (removed 54) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 64 cols
[2024-05-30 13:01:48] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned [33]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 86 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/106 places, 84/138 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 19 ms. Remains 63 /63 variables (removed 0) and now considering 84/84 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 125 ms. Remains : 63/106 places, 84/138 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:01:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:01:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11558485188146628233.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17086285422468419720.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11558485188146628233.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17086285422468419720.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.84375e+06,0.04729,4296,2,666,5,4343,6,0,339,2946,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(((((((((IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(OpenRequests_8>=1))&&(Idles>=1))||(((IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(OpenRequests_6>=1))&&(Idles>=1)))||((((IdleTechs_1...1394
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(((((((((IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(OpenRequests_8>=1))&&(Idles>=1))||(((IdleTechs_0>=1)&...1458
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.250249,7880,1,0,6,26930,15,0,1649,8381,5
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N06-CTLFireability-2024-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 138/138 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 94 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 94 transition count 126
Applied a total of 24 rules in 7 ms. Remains 94 /106 variables (removed 12) and now considering 126/138 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 126 rows 94 cols
[2024-05-30 13:01:48] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 92 ms returned [63]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 93 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 93/106 places, 126/138 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 93 /93 variables (removed 0) and now considering 126/126 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 102 ms. Remains : 93/106 places, 126/138 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:01:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 126 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:01:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18181031014360278121.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11582600338352559747.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18181031014360278121.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11582600338352559747.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.82423e+07,0.241772,8020,2,1970,5,24600,6,0,501,18549,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EX(AG(((((Clients_0>=1)||(Clients_1>=1))||((Clients_2>=1)||(Clients_3>=1)))||((Clients_4>=1)||(Clients_5>=1))))) + EX(!(E(((((((Start...842
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(E(TRUE U !(((((Clients_0>=1)||(Clients_1>=1))||((Clients_2>=1)||(Clients_3>=1)))||((C...937
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 84/0/42
(forward)formula 0,1,1.21597,29472,1,0,10,162304,22,2,2652,75870,10
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N06-CTLFireability-2024-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 138/138 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 94 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 94 transition count 126
Applied a total of 24 rules in 2 ms. Remains 94 /106 variables (removed 12) and now considering 126/138 (removed 12) transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:01:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 13:01:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 13:01:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 13:01:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 89 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 131 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 120 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:01:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 6/94 variables, 13/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 126/220 variables, 94/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 220/220 variables, and 109 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 4253 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 94/94 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 6/94 variables, 13/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 126/220 variables, 94/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 120/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 220/220 variables, and 229 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 4451 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 94/94 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 8756ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8758ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 94/106 places, 126/138 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8892 ms. Remains : 94/106 places, 126/138 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:01:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 126 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:01:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability725697797219647534.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 13:01:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8816785204758860303.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability725697797219647534.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8816785204758860303.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.82423e+07,0.415338,11232,2,3557,5,44398,6,0,505,28053,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(EF(AX(((((((((IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(OpenRequests_8>=1))&&(Idles>=1))||(((IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(OpenRequests_6>=1))&&(Idles>=1)))||((((IdleTec...4341
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(!(((((((((IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(OpenRequests_8>=1))&&(Idles>=1))||(((IdleTechs_...6147
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 78/0/48
(forward)formula 0,1,2.86431,60460,1,0,24,357144,33,9,2876,181338,21
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N06-CTLFireability-2024-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 138/138 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 106 /106 variables (removed 0) and now considering 138/138 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 138 rows 106 cols
[2024-05-30 13:02:01] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-30 13:02:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 105 ms returned [75]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 106 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 105/106 places, 138/138 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 105 /105 variables (removed 0) and now considering 138/138 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 110 ms. Remains : 105/106 places, 138/138 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:02:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 13:02:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 13:02:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 138 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:02:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-30 13:02:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 13:02:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7807015571660047545.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 13:02:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5803043537522957788.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7807015571660047545.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5803043537522957788.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.7622e+07,0.211596,9420,2,2249,5,31874,6,0,561,23633,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG((AX(AG(((((((StartSecuring_0<1)||(ClientsWaiting_0<1))&&((StartSecuring_10<1)||(ClientsWaiting_5<1)))&&(((StartSecuring_1<1)||(Clie...1594
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((!(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((((((StartSecuring_0<1)||(ClientsWaiting_0<1))&&((StartSe...1682
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,2.09772,51392,1,0,12,305182,25,3,2885,133385,13
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N06-CTLFireability-2024-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 106/106 places, 138/138 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 94 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 94 transition count 126
Applied a total of 24 rules in 4 ms. Remains 94 /106 variables (removed 12) and now considering 126/138 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 126 rows 94 cols
[2024-05-30 13:02:04] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-05-30 13:02:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 13:02:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 13:02:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 82 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 144 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 120 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:02:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 6/94 variables, 13/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 126/220 variables, 94/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 220/220 variables, and 109 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 4439 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 94/94 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 6/94 variables, 13/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 126/220 variables, 94/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 120/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/220 variables, 0/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 220/220 variables, and 229 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 5230 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 94/94 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 9730ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9737ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 94/106 places, 126/138 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9886 ms. Remains : 94/106 places, 126/138 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:02:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 13:02:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 13:02:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 126 transitions.
[2024-05-30 13:02:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 13:02:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 13:02:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2002024894996337781.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 13:02:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability93578266418772553.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2002024894996337781.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability93578266418772553.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...281
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.82423e+07,0.381116,11232,2,3557,5,44398,6,0,505,28053,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AG((((((EG(EF(((((((StartSecuring_8>=1)&&(ClientsTimeout_4>=1))||((StartSecuring_4>=1)&&(ClientsTimeout_2>=1)))||(((StartSecuring_3>=1...2125
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((((FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * !((((((NumClientsReq>=1)&&(DoSecuring_4>=1))||((NumClientsReq>=1)&&(DoSecuring_3>=1...2246
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,1.67623,39360,1,0,20,206659,27,10,2632,111894,13
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N06-CTLFireability-2024-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2024-05-30 13:02:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 13:02:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Total runtime 187916 ms.

BK_STOP 1717074135878

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N06"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N06, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r444-smll-171701110600058"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N06.tgz
mv UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N06 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;