Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r444-smll-171701110600050.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N04, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r444-smll-171701110600050
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 448K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.8K Apr 13 05:09 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 97K Apr 13 05:09 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.4K Apr 13 05:05 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 40K Apr 13 05:05 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K Apr 23 08:04 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 23K Apr 23 08:04 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.7K Apr 23 08:04 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Apr 23 08:04 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.2K Apr 13 05:15 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 76K Apr 13 05:15 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Apr 13 05:13 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 81K Apr 13 05:13 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.9K Apr 23 08:04 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.0K Apr 23 08:04 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-12
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-13
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-14
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1717073764456

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N04
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is COL
CTLFireability COL
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-30 12:56:06] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-30 12:56:06] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-30 12:56:06] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2024-05-30 12:56:07] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2024-05-30 12:56:07] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 1165 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:08] [INFO ] Imported 13 HL places and 12 HL transitions for a total of 72 PT places and 108.0 transition bindings in 34 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 52 ms.
[2024-05-30 12:56:08] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 13 places and 12 transitions 37 arcs in 8 ms.
[2024-05-30 12:56:08] [INFO ] Skeletonized 16 HLPN properties in 5 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Remains 8 properties that can be checked using skeleton over-approximation.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 1 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
RANDOM walk for 563 steps (0 resets) in 44 ms. (12 steps per ms) remains 0/11 properties
[2024-05-30 12:56:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Transition timeout forces synchronizations/join behavior on parameter c of sort Cli
Domain [Cli(4), Z(2), Z(2)] of place MovetoZ breaks symmetries in sort Z
[2024-05-30 12:56:08] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 72 places and 108 transitions 340 arcs in 40 ms.
[2024-05-30 12:56:08] [INFO ] Unfolded 16 HLPN properties in 1 ms.
[2024-05-30 12:56:08] [INFO ] Reduced 4 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-30 12:56:08] [INFO ] Reduced 4 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-30 12:56:08] [INFO ] Reduced 4 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-30 12:56:08] [INFO ] Reduced 4 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-30 12:56:08] [INFO ] Reduced 4 identical enabling conditions.
Ensure Unique test removed 16 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 16 transitions.
Support contains 72 out of 72 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 72 /72 variables (removed 0) and now considering 92/92 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 72 cols
[2024-05-30 12:56:08] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 31 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 339 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 12:56:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:56:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 182 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 582 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 88 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:56:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/72 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 92/164 variables, 72/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/164 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 164/164 variables, and 83 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 2693 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/72 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 92/164 variables, 72/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 88/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/164 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 164/164 variables, and 171 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 2477 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5343ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5369ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5998 ms. Remains : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Support contains 72 out of 72 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-30 12:56:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 49 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 34 to 27
RANDOM walk for 1995 steps (0 resets) in 199 ms. (9 steps per ms) remains 0/27 properties
[2024-05-30 12:56:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Performed 16 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 72 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 56 transition count 68
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 56 transition count 60
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 48 transition count 60
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 44 transition count 56
Applied a total of 64 rules in 40 ms. Remains 44 /72 variables (removed 28) and now considering 56/92 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 44 cols
[2024-05-30 12:56:15] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 159 ms returned [23]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 163 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 43/72 places, 56/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 43 /43 variables (removed 0) and now considering 56/56 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 206 ms. Remains : 43/72 places, 56/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:56:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:56:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17901126108888399827.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8739771389485974385.ctl : 7 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17901126108888399827.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8739771389485974385.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,34251,0.271154,3664,2,273,5,1499,6,0,231,1101,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((((((IdleTechs_1<1)||(OpenRequests_3<1))||(Idles<1))&&(((IdleTechs_0<1)||(OpenRequests_0<1))||(Idles<1)))&&((((IdleTechs_1<1)||(OpenR...450
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((((((IdleTechs_1<1)||(OpenRequests_3<1))||(Idles<1))&&(((IdleTechs_0<1)||(OpenRequests_0<1))||(Idles...493
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 20/32/36
(forward)formula 0,0,0.313112,5068,1,0,7,8724,19,1,1210,3826,8
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 72 /72 variables (removed 0) and now considering 92/92 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 72 cols
[2024-05-30 12:56:16] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 12:56:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:56:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 139 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 199 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 88 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:56:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/72 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 92/164 variables, 72/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/164 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 164/164 variables, and 83 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 2853 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/72 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 92/164 variables, 72/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 88/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/164 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 164/164 variables, and 171 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 3156 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6113ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6117ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6318 ms. Remains : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:56:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:56:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15877301183920319193.gal : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8101851378413565789.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15877301183920319193.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8101851378413565789.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,210432,0.147172,6432,2,1319,5,14634,6,0,383,10426,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((A(EG(EF((((ClientsWaiting_1>=1)||(ClientsWaiting_0>=1))||((ClientsWaiting_3>=1)||(ClientsWaiting_2>=1))))) U EG((EX((((((((IdleTechs_...3568
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!((E(!(EG((EX((((((((IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(OpenRequests_1>=1))&&(Idles>=1))||(((IdleTechs_1>=1)&&(OpenRe...6212
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 32/1240/60
(forward)formula 0,1,1.69701,41124,1,0,13,219545,50,3,2416,125554,20
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 72 transition count 84
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 64 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 8 ms. Remains 64 /72 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 64 cols
[2024-05-30 12:56:24] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned [43]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 53 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 63 /63 variables (removed 0) and now considering 84/84 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 65 ms. Remains : 63/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:56:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:56:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6932929749657749811.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1610440610253723571.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6932929749657749811.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1610440610253723571.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,144896,0.03314,4232,2,483,5,3770,6,0,339,2905,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((((((AG((((ControlRoomDispatch_3>=1)||(ControlRoomDispatch_2>=1))||((ControlRoomDispatch_1>=1)||(ControlRoomDispatch_0>=1)))) * (Move...2154
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((((((((IdleTechs_0<1)||(OpenRequests_6<1))||(Idles<1))&&(((IdleTechs_0<1)||(OpenReque...2218
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.14437,6344,1,0,6,16308,15,0,1585,3632,5
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 72 /72 variables (removed 0) and now considering 92/92 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 72 cols
[2024-05-30 12:56:24] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 12:56:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:56:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 86 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 134 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-30 12:56:24] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 88 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:56:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/72 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 92/164 variables, 72/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/164 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 164/164 variables, and 83 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 2774 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/72 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 92/164 variables, 72/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 88/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/164 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 164/164 variables, and 171 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 2164 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4998ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5002ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5151 ms. Remains : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:56:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:56:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1789776856059464493.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14700803117110987451.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1789776856059464493.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14700803117110987451.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,210432,0.149937,6428,2,1319,5,14634,6,0,383,10426,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(E(((((((!(((((StartSecuring_3>=1)&&(ClientsTimeout_1>=1))||((StartSecuring_1>=1)&&(ClientsTimeout_0>=1)))||(((StartSecuring_6>=1)&&(C...5211
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(E(((((((!(((((StartSecuring_3>=1)&&(ClientsTimeout_1>=1))||((StartSecuring_1>=1)&&(ClientsTimeout_...7108
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 48/44/44
(forward)formula 0,1,3.49505,93348,1,0,91,510848,48,58,2178,476600,87
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Performed 16 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 72 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 56 transition count 68
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 56 transition count 60
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 48 transition count 60
Applied a total of 56 rules in 9 ms. Remains 48 /72 variables (removed 24) and now considering 60/92 (removed 32) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 48 cols
[2024-05-30 12:56:33] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 12:56:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:56:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 110 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-30 12:56:33] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 56 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:56:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/48 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 60/108 variables, 48/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/108 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 108/108 variables, and 59 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved in 980 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 48/48 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/48 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 60/108 variables, 48/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 56/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/108 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 108/108 variables, and 115 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved in 1081 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 48/48 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2082ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2084ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 48/72 places, 60/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2209 ms. Remains : 48/72 places, 60/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:56:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 60 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:56:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2653540877180339337.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9782445543006962602.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2653540877180339337.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9782445543006962602.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,50688,0.033226,3836,2,461,5,2743,6,0,255,1984,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(((EF((((((NumClientsReq>=1)&&(DoSecuring_1>=1))||((NumClientsReq>=1)&&(DoSecuring_2>=1)))||(((NumClientsReq>=1)&&(DoSecuring_3>=1))...2617
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(((E(TRUE U (((((NumClientsReq>=1)&&(DoSecuring_1>=1))||((NumClientsReq>=1)&&(Do...2693
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.538505,14900,1,0,9,68994,26,3,1391,42765,10
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 64 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 64 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 9 ms. Remains 64 /72 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 64 cols
[2024-05-30 12:56:36] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 89 ms returned [42]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 91 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 63 /63 variables (removed 0) and now considering 84/84 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 102 ms. Remains : 63/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:56:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:56:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8739667985941914835.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15238903361702366527.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8739667985941914835.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15238903361702366527.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,144896,0.039631,4188,2,485,5,3177,6,0,339,2166,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A(((((Assigned_2>=1)||(Assigned_3>=1))||((Assigned_4>=1)||(Assigned_5>=1)))||(((Assigned_6>=1)||(Assigned_7>=1))||((Assigned_0>=1)||(A...605
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!(!(EX(!((!(EG(!((((Finished_1>=1)||(Finished_0>=1))||((Finished_3>=1)||(Finished_2>=1)))))) + !...1607
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.383759,12900,1,0,7,60299,34,1,1789,29090,11
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 64 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 64 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 4 ms. Remains 64 /72 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:56:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:56:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned [43]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 55 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 63 /63 variables (removed 0) and now considering 84/84 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 61 ms. Remains : 63/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:56:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:56:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13339553180375957921.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3931497489508003802.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13339553180375957921.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3931497489508003802.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,144896,0.049777,4236,2,523,5,3608,6,0,339,2725,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((EX(AX((((((StartSecuring_3<1)||(ClientsTimeout_1<1))&&((StartSecuring_1<1)||(ClientsTimeout_0<1)))&&(((StartSecuring_6<1)||(ClientsTi...1279
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(EX(!(EX(!((((((StartSecuring_3<1)||(ClientsTimeout_1<1))&&((StartSecuring_1<1)||(ClientsTimeout_...1364
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,0.44199,11612,1,0,14,55506,23,3,1850,26885,13
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 64 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 64 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 2 ms. Remains 64 /72 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:56:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:56:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 12:56:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:56:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 71 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 107 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 80 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:56:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/64 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 84/148 variables, 64/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 148/148 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 2233 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/64 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 84/148 variables, 64/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 80/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 148/148 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 2807 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5088ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5089ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5201 ms. Remains : 64/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:56:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:56:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9109774008131210330.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6855755439031980218.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9109774008131210330.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6855755439031980218.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,144896,0.116498,5588,2,1229,5,11097,6,0,343,7550,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AX(AF((((Finished_1>=1)||(Finished_0>=1))||((Finished_3>=1)||(Finished_2>=1))))) + (((((((IdleTechs_1<1)||(OpenRequests_3<1))||(Idles...1914
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(EX(!(!(EG(!((((Finished_1>=1)||(Finished_0>=1))||((Finished_3>=1)||(Finished_2>=1))))))))) + (((...2308
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 60/168/24
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,1.76445,49872,1,0,11,275622,47,1,2086,155719,13
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Performed 16 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 72 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 56 transition count 68
Applied a total of 40 rules in 8 ms. Remains 56 /72 variables (removed 16) and now considering 68/92 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 56 cols
[2024-05-30 12:56:44] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 12:56:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:56:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 57 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 92 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-30 12:56:44] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 64 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:56:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/56 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 68/124 variables, 56/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/124 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 124/124 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved in 1643 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 56/56 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/56 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 68/124 variables, 56/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 64/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/124 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 124/124 variables, and 131 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved in 1901 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 56/56 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3562ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3563ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 56/72 places, 68/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3671 ms. Remains : 56/72 places, 68/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:56:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 68 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:56:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12007346706179635820.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10728134307803062618.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12007346706179635820.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10728134307803062618.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,91648,0.043661,4212,2,586,5,3520,6,0,295,2491,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EF(!(A((((Finished_1>=1)||(Finished_0>=1))||((Finished_3>=1)||(Finished_2>=1))) U ((((((StartSecuring_3>=1)&&(ClientsTimeout_1>=1))||...1541
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((((ClientsWaiting_1<1)&&(ClientsWaiting_0<1))&&((ClientsWaiting_3<1)&&(ClientsWaiting_2<...3097
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 28/162/40
(forward)formula 0,1,0.606539,14512,1,0,7,67932,28,0,1709,34043,10
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 64 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 64 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 3 ms. Remains 64 /72 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 64 cols
[2024-05-30 12:56:48] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 12:56:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:56:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 91 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 142 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 80 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:56:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/64 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 84/148 variables, 64/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 148/148 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 2355 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/64 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 84/148 variables, 64/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 80/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 148/148 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 2822 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5225ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5227ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5373 ms. Remains : 64/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:56:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:56:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2149352728899857220.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 12:56:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15275822254347212149.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2149352728899857220.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15275822254347212149.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,144896,0.114118,5588,2,1229,5,11097,6,0,343,7550,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(AX((AX((((Finished_1<1)&&(Finished_0<1))&&((Finished_3<1)&&(Finished_2<1)))) * !(E((((((((IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(OpenRequests_1>=1))&&(Idl...2874
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * E(TRUE U !(EX(!((!(EX(!((((Finished_1<1)&&(Finished_0<1))&&((Finished_3<1)&&(Finished_2<1)))))) * ...2941
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 40/0/44
(forward)formula 0,1,1.54761,42524,1,0,22,234733,46,10,2016,136806,22
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 64 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 64 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 10 ms. Remains 64 /72 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:56:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:56:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 12:56:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:56:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 94 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 142 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-30 12:56:55] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 80 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:56:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/64 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 84/148 variables, 64/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 148/148 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 2345 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/64 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 84/148 variables, 64/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 80/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 148/148 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 2260 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4649ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4651ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4815 ms. Remains : 64/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:57:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-30 12:57:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 12:57:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:57:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 12:57:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 12:57:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13235246243454898724.gal : 9 ms
[2024-05-30 12:57:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14881480234676232011.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13235246243454898724.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14881480234676232011.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,144896,0.117374,5588,2,1229,5,11097,6,0,343,7550,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A(!(((((((((NumClientsReq>=1)&&(DoSecuring_1>=1))||((NumClientsReq>=1)&&(DoSecuring_2>=1)))||(((NumClientsReq>=1)&&(DoSecuring_3>=1))|...3331
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!((((((((IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(OpenRequests_1>=1))&&(Idles>=1))||(((IdleTechs_1>=1)&&(OpenRequests_3...5219
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 40/46/44
(forward)formula 0,1,2.42206,57240,1,0,75,294102,27,48,1911,242284,56
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 64 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 64 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 2 ms. Remains 64 /72 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:57:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:57:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 12:57:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:57:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 92 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 146 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 80 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:57:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/64 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 84/148 variables, 64/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 148/148 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 2123 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/64 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 84/148 variables, 64/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 80/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 148/148 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 2904 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5058ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5060ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5210 ms. Remains : 64/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:57:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 12:57:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 12:57:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:57:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 12:57:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 12:57:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5578048694802208752.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 12:57:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8141387539507125489.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5578048694802208752.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8141387539507125489.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,144896,0.113792,5580,2,1229,5,11097,6,0,343,7550,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(A((!((((((ClientsWaiting_1>=1)||(ClientsWaiting_0>=1))||((ClientsWaiting_3>=1)||(ClientsWaiting_2>=1)))||(((Clients_0>=1)||(Clients_1>=...2748
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EX(!(!((E(!(EX(!(EG(!((((((StartSecuring_5>=1)&&(ClientsWaiting_2>=1))||((StartSecuring_4>=1)...9111
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,4.37051,98892,1,0,41,575745,49,31,1957,428611,47
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 64 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 64 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 4 ms. Remains 64 /72 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:57:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:57:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 80 ms returned [42, 43]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 82 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 62 /62 variables (removed 0) and now considering 84/84 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 87 ms. Remains : 62/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:57:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 12:57:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 12:57:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:57:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 12:57:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 12:57:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4801294444822296265.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 12:57:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15832359223174848568.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4801294444822296265.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15832359223174848568.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,144896,0.022307,3836,2,292,5,2042,6,0,335,1484,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AG(((((((Clients_0>=1)||(Clients_1>=1))||((Clients_2>=1)||(Clients_3>=1)))||(((ControlRoomDispatch_3>=1)||(ControlRoomDispatch_2>=1))|...706
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * !(((((((Clients_0>=1)||(Clients_1>=1))||((Clients_2>=1)||(Clients_3>=1)))||(((ControlRoo...760
(forward)formula 0,0,0.042341,4152,1,0,8,3174,10,2,724,2598,4
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 72 /72 variables (removed 0) and now considering 92/92 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 72 cols
[2024-05-30 12:57:12] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-30 12:57:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 12:57:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:57:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 87 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 130 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 88 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:57:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/72 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 92/164 variables, 72/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/164 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 164/164 variables, and 83 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 2339 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/72 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 92/164 variables, 72/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 88/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/164 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 164/164 variables, and 171 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 2898 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5277ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5279ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5411 ms. Remains : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:57:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 12:57:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2024-05-30 12:57:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:57:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 12:57:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 12:57:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10999122320511104137.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 12:57:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability966926743733670225.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10999122320511104137.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability966926743733670225.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,210432,0.145709,6428,2,1319,5,14634,6,0,383,10426,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AG(((((ClientsWaiting_1>=1)||(ClientsWaiting_0>=1))||((ClientsWaiting_3>=1)||(ClientsWaiting_2>=1))) + (AF(E((((Clients_0>=1)||(Clients...2930
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EX(!(EG(!(((((((NumClientsReq>=1)&&(DoSecuring_1>=1))||((NumClientsReq>=1)&&(DoSecuring_2>=1)...4055
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 84/0/8
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,4.34889,107164,1,0,14,651688,47,5,2238,415494,14
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 64 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 64 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 3 ms. Remains 64 /72 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 64 cols
[2024-05-30 12:57:22] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-30 12:57:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned [43]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 48 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 63 /63 variables (removed 0) and now considering 84/84 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 52 ms. Remains : 63/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:57:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 12:57:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 12:57:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:57:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 12:57:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 12:57:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11628001218966892467.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 12:57:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12474764795859106874.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11628001218966892467.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12474764795859106874.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,144896,0.029626,4236,2,523,5,3608,6,0,339,2725,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(((((((Clients_0>=1)||(Clients_1>=1))||((Clients_2>=1)||(Clients_3>=1)))||(((((IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(OpenRequests_1>=1))&&(Idles>=1))||(...1006
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(((((((Clients_0>=1)||(Clients_1>=1))||((Clients_2>=1)||(Clients_3>=1)))||(((((IdleTechs...1060
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.12227,7140,1,0,8,24234,10,2,1513,8787,4
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 64 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 64 transition count 84
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 60 transition count 80
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 55 transition count 76
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 47 transition count 68
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 8 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 8 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 47 transition count 60
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 46 transition count 52
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 45 transition count 52
Applied a total of 60 rules in 19 ms. Remains 45 /72 variables (removed 27) and now considering 52/92 (removed 40) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 52 rows 45 cols
[2024-05-30 12:57:22] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-30 12:57:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 12:57:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:57:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 55 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 89 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-30 12:57:23] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 40 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:57:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/45 variables, 4/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 52/97 variables, 45/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/97 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 97/97 variables, and 54 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 844 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/45 variables, 4/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 52/97 variables, 45/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 40/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/97 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 97/97 variables, and 94 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 969 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1833ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1834ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/72 places, 52/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1948 ms. Remains : 45/72 places, 52/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:57:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 12:57:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 12:57:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 52 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:57:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 12:57:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 12:57:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1439033377484386883.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 12:57:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16072472382762921304.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1439033377484386883.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16072472382762921304.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,42768,0.020967,3688,2,181,5,1101,6,0,235,883,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(EG(AG((((((Assigned_2>=1)||(Assigned_3>=1))||((Assigned_4>=1)||(Assigned_5>=1)))||(((Assigned_6>=1)||(Assigned_7>=1))||((Assigned_0>=...732
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(E(TRUE U !((((((Assigned_2>=1)||(Assigned_3>=1))||((Assigned_4>=1)||(Assigned_5>=1)))||...812
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.080614,5060,1,0,8,7058,32,2,1149,2908,9
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N04-CTLFireability-2024-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2024-05-30 12:57:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 12:57:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Total runtime 78376 ms.

BK_STOP 1717073845060

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N04"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N04, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r444-smll-171701110600050"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N04.tgz
mv UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T4N04 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;