Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r444-smll-171701110600025.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N08, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r444-smll-171701110600025
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 508K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.9K Apr 13 05:34 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 94K Apr 13 05:34 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K Apr 13 05:31 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K Apr 13 05:31 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.4K Apr 23 08:04 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K Apr 23 08:04 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.9K Apr 23 08:04 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K Apr 23 08:04 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K Apr 13 05:42 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 122K Apr 13 05:42 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.7K Apr 13 05:39 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 69K Apr 13 05:39 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.0K Apr 23 08:04 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.0K Apr 23 08:04 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N08-CTLCardinality-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N08-CTLCardinality-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N08-CTLCardinality-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N08-CTLCardinality-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N08-CTLCardinality-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N08-CTLCardinality-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N08-CTLCardinality-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N08-CTLCardinality-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N08-CTLCardinality-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N08-CTLCardinality-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N08-CTLCardinality-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N08-CTLCardinality-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N08-CTLCardinality-2024-12
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N08-CTLCardinality-2024-13
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N08-CTLCardinality-2024-14
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N08-CTLCardinality-2024-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1717071672884

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N08
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is COL
CTLCardinality COL
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-30 12:21:15] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-30 12:21:15] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-30 12:21:15] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2024-05-30 12:21:16] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2024-05-30 12:21:16] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 1307 ms
[2024-05-30 12:21:17] [INFO ] Imported 13 HL places and 12 HL transitions for a total of 140 PT places and 216.0 transition bindings in 35 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 70 ms.
[2024-05-30 12:21:17] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 13 places and 12 transitions 37 arcs in 7 ms.
[2024-05-30 12:21:17] [INFO ] Skeletonized 16 HLPN properties in 34 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Remains 16 properties that can be checked using skeleton over-approximation.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 1 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
RANDOM walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 4474 ms. (8 steps per ms) remains 63/103 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 59 ms. (66 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 76 ms. (52 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 43 ms. (91 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 67 ms. (58 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 60 ms. (65 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 40 ms. (97 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 32 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 37 ms. (105 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 45 ms. (87 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 31 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 42 ms. (93 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 47 ms. (83 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 36 ms. (108 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (8 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 35 ms. (111 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 36 ms. (108 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 33 ms. (117 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 34 ms. (114 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 33 ms. (117 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 43 ms. (91 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 44 ms. (88 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 44 ms. (88 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 49 ms. (80 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (8 resets) in 39 ms. (100 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 63/63 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 11 rows 13 cols
[2024-05-30 12:21:19] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 5 ms
Problem AtomicPropp0 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp2 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp3 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp4 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp6 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp7 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp10 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp11 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp12 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp13 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp14 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp16 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp17 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp20 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp21 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp22 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp25 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp26 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp27 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp28 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp29 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp30 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp31 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp33 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp34 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp36 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp37 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp39 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp41 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp42 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp43 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp45 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp46 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp47 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp49 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp51 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp52 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp54 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp59 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp60 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp62 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp63 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp67 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp68 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp70 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp71 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp72 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp73 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp74 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp76 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp77 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp79 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp81 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp83 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp89 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp90 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp91 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp93 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp95 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp97 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp98 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp99 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp101 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 13/24 variables, and 5 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 63 solved, 0 unsolved in 328 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 427ms problems are : Problem set: 63 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 63 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2024-05-30 12:21:19] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 3 formulas.
[2024-05-30 12:21:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N08-CTLCardinality-2024-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N08-CTLCardinality-2024-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N08-CTLCardinality-2024-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-30 12:21:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Transition timeout forces synchronizations/join behavior on parameter c of sort Cli
Domain [Cli(8), Z(2), Z(2)] of place MovetoZ breaks symmetries in sort Z
[2024-05-30 12:21:20] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 140 places and 216 transitions 680 arcs in 38 ms.
[2024-05-30 12:21:20] [INFO ] Unfolded 13 HLPN properties in 10 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 32 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 32 transitions.
Support contains 140 out of 140 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 140/140 places, 184/184 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 140 /140 variables (removed 0) and now considering 184/184 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 184 rows 140 cols
[2024-05-30 12:21:20] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 16 ms
[2024-05-30 12:21:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 132 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 12:21:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:21:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 179 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 326 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 176 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:21:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 8/140 variables, 17/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 184/324 variables, 140/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/324 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 324/324 variables, and 159 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved in 8486 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 140/140 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 176/176 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 8/140 variables, 17/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 184/324 variables, 140/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 176/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/324 variables, 0/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/324 variables, 0/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 324/324 variables, and 335 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved in 10369 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 140/140 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 176/176 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 19097ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 19104ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 19464 ms. Remains : 140/140 places, 184/184 transitions.
Support contains 140 out of 140 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-30 12:21:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 45 ms
[2024-05-30 12:21:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2024-05-30 12:21:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 184 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 4351 ms. (9 steps per ms) remains 51/85 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 36 ms. (108 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 36 ms. (108 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 27 ms. (142 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 25 ms. (154 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 27 ms. (142 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 54 ms. (72 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 34 ms. (114 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 27 ms. (143 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 27 ms. (143 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 45 ms. (87 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 32 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 32 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 34 ms. (114 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 51/51 properties
[2024-05-30 12:21:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Problem AtomicPropp0 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp2 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp3 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp4 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp6 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp7 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp10 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp11 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp12 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp13 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp14 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp16 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp17 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp20 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp21 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp22 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp25 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp26 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp27 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp28 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp29 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp30 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp31 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp33 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp34 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp36 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp37 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp39 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp41 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp42 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp43 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp45 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp46 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp47 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp49 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp55 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp56 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp58 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp59 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp63 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp64 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp66 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp67 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp68 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp69 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp71 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp72 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp74 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp76 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp78 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp84 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 140/324 variables, and 19 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 51 solved, 0 unsolved in 105 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 0/140 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 268ms problems are : Problem set: 51 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 51 atomic propositions for a total of 13 simplifications.
[2024-05-30 12:21:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2024-05-30 12:21:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2024-05-30 12:21:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 184 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 140/140 places, 184/184 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 124 transition count 168
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 124 transition count 168
Applied a total of 32 rules in 22 ms. Remains 124 /140 variables (removed 16) and now considering 168/184 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 168 rows 124 cols
[2024-05-30 12:21:42] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 6 ms
[2024-05-30 12:21:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 108 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 12:21:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:21:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 201 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 314 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 160 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:21:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 8/124 variables, 17/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 168/292 variables, 124/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/292 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 292/292 variables, and 143 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved in 7054 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 160/160 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 8/124 variables, 17/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 168/292 variables, 124/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 160/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 0/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/292 variables, 0/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 292/292 variables, and 303 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved in 8771 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 160/160 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 16007ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 16012ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 124/140 places, 168/184 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 16350 ms. Remains : 124/140 places, 168/184 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:21:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2024-05-30 12:21:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2024-05-30 12:21:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 168 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:21:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2024-05-30 12:21:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2024-05-30 12:21:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality69696015473380117.gal : 9 ms
[2024-05-30 12:21:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15816056770176425186.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality69696015473380117.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15816056770176425186.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.69685e+09,1.31331,25840,2,9761,5,126617,6,0,667,80931,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((EF((((((Clients_0+Clients_1)+(Clients_2+Clients_3))+((Clients_4+Clients_5)+(Clients_6+Clients_7)))<=1)||((((Finished_0+Finished_1)+(...1032
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (E(TRUE U (((((Clients_0+Clients_1)+(Clients_2+Clients_3))+((Clients_4+Clients_5)+(C...1643
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,4.39506,97408,1,0,8,524776,16,1,3795,147778,8
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N08-CTLCardinality-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 140/140 places, 184/184 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 124 transition count 168
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 124 transition count 168
Applied a total of 32 rules in 11 ms. Remains 124 /140 variables (removed 16) and now considering 168/184 (removed 16) transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:22:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:22:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 157 ms returned [83]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 163 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 123/140 places, 168/184 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 123 /123 variables (removed 0) and now considering 168/168 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 181 ms. Remains : 123/140 places, 168/184 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:22:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 168 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:22:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15115552481753340764.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17658963557274163404.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15115552481753340764.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17658963557274163404.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.69685e+09,0.614127,15744,2,5412,5,66909,6,0,663,45556,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AX(FALSE))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(EY(Init)) * !(FALSE))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,0.629951,15744,1,0,7,66909,7,1,948,45556,2
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N08-CTLCardinality-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 140/140 places, 184/184 transitions.
Performed 32 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 32
Iterating post reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 140 transition count 152
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 16 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 16 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 108 transition count 136
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 108 transition count 120
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 92 transition count 120
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 113 place count 91 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 91 transition count 104
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 122 place count 83 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 83 transition count 96
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 138 place count 75 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 75 transition count 80
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 66 transition count 72
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 57 transition count 64
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 49 transition count 56
Applied a total of 196 rules in 66 ms. Remains 49 /140 variables (removed 91) and now considering 56/184 (removed 128) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 49 cols
[2024-05-30 12:22:04] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 12:22:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:22:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 99 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 161 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-30 12:22:04] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 32 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:22:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 8/49 variables, 8/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 56/105 variables, 49/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 105/105 variables, and 66 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved in 779 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 8/49 variables, 8/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 56/105 variables, 49/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 32/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 105/105 variables, and 98 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved in 885 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1694ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1695ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/140 places, 56/184 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1938 ms. Remains : 49/140 places, 56/184 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:22:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:22:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8428189273354596994.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7061414734139351761.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8428189273354596994.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7061414734139351761.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.13841e+07,0.021376,3736,2,203,5,1021,6,0,255,663,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(((((ClientsTimeout_0+ClientsTimeout_1)+(ClientsTimeout_2+ClientsTimeout_3))+((ClientsTimeout_4+ClientsTimeout_5)+(ClientsTimeout_6+...453
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),((((ClientsTimeout_0+ClientsTimeout_1)+(ClientsTimeout_2+ClientsTimeout_3))+((ClientsTimeo...503
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 8/0/48
(forward)formula 0,1,0.344429,7748,1,0,7,13459,19,0,3918,14182,8
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N08-CTLCardinality-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 140/140 places, 184/184 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 124 transition count 168
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 124 transition count 168
Applied a total of 32 rules in 19 ms. Remains 124 /140 variables (removed 16) and now considering 168/184 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 168 rows 124 cols
[2024-05-30 12:22:06] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 150 ms returned [83]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 152 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 123/140 places, 168/184 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 123 /123 variables (removed 0) and now considering 168/168 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 180 ms. Remains : 123/140 places, 168/184 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:22:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 168 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:22:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8122016269047396953.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18039153219247823729.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8122016269047396953.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18039153219247823729.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.69685e+09,0.545644,15812,2,5412,5,66909,6,0,663,45556,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(FALSE)
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(FALSE))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,0.552358,15812,1,0,6,66909,7,1,908,45556,1
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N08-CTLCardinality-2024-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 140/140 places, 184/184 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 140 /140 variables (removed 0) and now considering 184/184 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 184 rows 140 cols
[2024-05-30 12:22:07] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 117 ms returned [99]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 128 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 139/140 places, 184/184 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 139 /139 variables (removed 0) and now considering 184/184 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 136 ms. Remains : 139/140 places, 184/184 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:22:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 184 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:22:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3218858318380302691.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality195991477886663938.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3218858318380302691.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality195991477886663938.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.60793e+09,0.552665,18220,2,5649,5,81599,6,0,743,53559,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF(EG(AX(EF((((((DoSecuring_0+DoSecuring_1)+(DoSecuring_2+DoSecuring_3))+((DoSecuring_4+DoSecuring_5)+(DoSecuring_6+DoSecuring_7)))+((...688
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(EG(!(EX(!(E(TRUE U (((((DoSecuring_0+DoSecuring_1)+(DoSecuring_2+DoSecuring_3))+((DoSecu...752
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,2.66689,72712,1,0,6,442308,21,0,4079,118875,8
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N08-CTLCardinality-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 140/140 places, 184/184 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 140 /140 variables (removed 0) and now considering 184/184 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:22:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:22:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 81 ms returned [99]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 82 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 139/140 places, 184/184 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 139 /139 variables (removed 0) and now considering 184/184 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 86 ms. Remains : 139/140 places, 184/184 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:22:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 184 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:22:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4873550714938066785.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12001592766793782276.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4873550714938066785.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12001592766793782276.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.60793e+09,0.792289,18248,2,5649,5,81599,6,0,743,53559,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG(AX(AF(((((((MovetoZ_0+MovetoZ_1)+(MovetoZ_2+MovetoZ_3))+((MovetoZ_4+MovetoZ_5)+(MovetoZ_6+MovetoZ_7)))+(((MovetoZ_8+MovetoZ_9)+(Mov...732
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!(!(EG(!(((((((MovetoZ_0+MovetoZ_1)+(MovetoZ_2+MovetoZ_3))+((MovetoZ_4+MovetoZ_5)...801
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,7.75243,196244,1,0,6,1.41919e+06,26,0,3882,470796,5
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N08-CTLCardinality-2024-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 140/140 places, 184/184 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 140 /140 variables (removed 0) and now considering 184/184 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:22:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:22:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 101 ms returned [99]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 102 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 139/140 places, 184/184 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 139 /139 variables (removed 0) and now considering 184/184 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 106 ms. Remains : 139/140 places, 184/184 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:22:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 184 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:22:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9140922988893287298.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5827935811207612043.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9140922988893287298.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5827935811207612043.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.60793e+09,0.469463,18252,2,5649,5,81599,6,0,743,53559,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((EF(((((ClientsTimeout_0+ClientsTimeout_1)+(ClientsTimeout_2+ClientsTimeout_3))+((ClientsTimeout_4+ClientsTimeout_5)+(ClientsTimeout_6...1909
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(EY((EY(Init) * E(TRUE U ((((ClientsTimeout_0+ClientsTimeout_1)+(ClientsTimeout_2+ClientsTimeout_3))+((Cli...2818
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,2.29358,68416,1,0,9,415415,14,2,4206,78939,8
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N08-CTLCardinality-2024-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 140/140 places, 184/184 transitions.
Performed 32 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 32
Iterating post reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 140 transition count 152
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 16 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 16 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 108 transition count 136
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 108 transition count 120
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 92 transition count 120
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 113 place count 91 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 91 transition count 104
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 122 place count 83 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 83 transition count 96
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 138 place count 75 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 75 transition count 80
Applied a total of 146 rules in 31 ms. Remains 75 /140 variables (removed 65) and now considering 80/184 (removed 104) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 75 cols
[2024-05-30 12:22:20] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned [42]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 69 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 74/140 places, 80/184 transitions.
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 66 transition count 72
Applied a total of 16 rules in 6 ms. Remains 66 /74 variables (removed 8) and now considering 72/80 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 66 cols
[2024-05-30 12:22:20] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 12:22:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:22:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 120 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 66/140 places, 72/184 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 226 ms. Remains : 66/140 places, 72/184 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:22:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 72 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 46 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (9 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N08-CTLCardinality-2024-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2024-05-30 12:22:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality11137078570046702829.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8436585397654142360.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality11137078570046702829.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8436585397654142360.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 140/140 places, 184/184 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 124 transition count 168
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 124 transition count 168
Applied a total of 32 rules in 4 ms. Remains 124 /140 variables (removed 16) and now considering 168/184 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 168 rows 124 cols
[2024-05-30 12:22:20] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 94 ms returned [83]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 96 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 123/140 places, 168/184 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 123 /123 variables (removed 0) and now considering 168/168 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 102 ms. Remains : 123/140 places, 168/184 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:22:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 168 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:22:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2741050661987876505.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6411557851184308977.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2741050661987876505.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6411557851184308977.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.69685e+09,0.44096,15796,2,5412,5,66909,6,0,663,45556,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(FALSE)
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(FALSE))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,0.448114,15796,1,0,6,66909,7,1,908,45556,1
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N08-CTLCardinality-2024-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 140/140 places, 184/184 transitions.
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 140 transition count 168
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 124 transition count 168
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 116 transition count 160
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 107 transition count 152
Performed 16 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 16
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 91 transition count 136
Applied a total of 97 rules in 20 ms. Remains 91 /140 variables (removed 49) and now considering 136/184 (removed 48) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 136 rows 91 cols
[2024-05-30 12:22:21] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 93 ms returned [74]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 94 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 90/140 places, 136/184 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 90 /90 variables (removed 0) and now considering 136/136 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 121 ms. Remains : 90/140 places, 136/184 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:22:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 136 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:22:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12473507752939021043.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7763952086277893605.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12473507752939021043.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7763952086277893605.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.46904e+08,0.073359,4560,2,452,5,5496,6,0,499,3233,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(((((((MovetoZ_0+MovetoZ_1)+(MovetoZ_2+MovetoZ_3))+((MovetoZ_4+MovetoZ_5)+(MovetoZ_6+MovetoZ_7)))+(((MovetoZ_8+MovetoZ_9)+(MovetoZ_1...708
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((((((MovetoZ_0+MovetoZ_1)+(MovetoZ_2+MovetoZ_3))+((MovetoZ_4+MovetoZ_5)+(MovetoZ...768
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.358584,8240,1,0,6,23726,14,0,4036,4115,5
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N08-CTLCardinality-2024-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 140/140 places, 184/184 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 32 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 32 transitions
Performed 32 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 32
Iterating post reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 140 transition count 152
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 16 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 16 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 108 transition count 136
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 107 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 107 transition count 120
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 90 place count 99 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 99 transition count 112
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 90 transition count 104
Applied a total of 115 rules in 33 ms. Remains 90 /140 variables (removed 50) and now considering 104/184 (removed 80) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 90 cols
[2024-05-30 12:22:22] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 90 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 12:22:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:22:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 157 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 250 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-30 12:22:22] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 96 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:22:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 8/90 variables, 17/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 104/194 variables, 90/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/194 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 194/194 variables, and 108 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 3027 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 90/90 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 8/90 variables, 17/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 104/194 variables, 90/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 96/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/194 variables, 0/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 194/194 variables, and 204 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 2900 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 90/90 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5960ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5962ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 90/140 places, 104/184 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6256 ms. Remains : 90/140 places, 104/184 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:22:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 104 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:22:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16384372903668715466.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12527996646045096302.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16384372903668715466.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12527996646045096302.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.31888e+08,0.078148,5132,2,1562,5,9008,6,0,467,4927,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF((NumClientsReq<=((((StartSecuring_0+StartSecuring_1)+(StartSecuring_2+StartSecuring_3))+((StartSecuring_4+StartSecuring_5)+(StartSe...334
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U (NumClientsReq<=((((StartSecuring_0+StartSecuring_1)+(StartSecuring_2+StartSecuring_3))+((St...383
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.644693,16908,1,0,6,79588,18,1,2669,19990,10
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N08-CTLCardinality-2024-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 140/140 places, 184/184 transitions.
Performed 32 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 32
Iterating post reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 140 transition count 152
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 16 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 16 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 108 transition count 136
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 108 transition count 120
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 92 transition count 120
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 84 transition count 112
Applied a total of 128 rules in 24 ms. Remains 84 /140 variables (removed 56) and now considering 112/184 (removed 72) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 112 rows 84 cols
[2024-05-30 12:22:28] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 113 ms returned [50]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 115 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 83/140 places, 112/184 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 83 /83 variables (removed 0) and now considering 112/112 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 143 ms. Remains : 83/140 places, 112/184 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:22:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 112 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:22:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10310886696466931750.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12571089472659407067.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10310886696466931750.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12571089472659407067.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.14945e+08,0.051535,4980,2,1249,5,9051,6,0,447,5070,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EF(!((((((ClientsTimeout_0+ClientsTimeout_1)+(ClientsTimeout_2+ClientsTimeout_3))+((ClientsTimeout_4+ClientsTimeout_5)+(ClientsTimeout_...254
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((NumClientsReq<=5)))))))) * !(E(!(!(E(TRUE U !((NumClientsReq<=5))))) U (!(E(TRUE ...417
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.30744,13948,1,0,7,57052,20,0,2286,15740,11
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N08-CTLCardinality-2024-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 140/140 places, 184/184 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 124 transition count 168
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 124 transition count 168
Applied a total of 32 rules in 2 ms. Remains 124 /140 variables (removed 16) and now considering 168/184 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 168 rows 124 cols
[2024-05-30 12:22:29] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 12:22:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:22:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 141 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 195 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 160 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:22:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 8/124 variables, 17/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 168/292 variables, 124/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/292 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 292/292 variables, and 143 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved in 5747 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 160/160 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 8/124 variables, 17/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 168/292 variables, 124/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 160/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 0/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/292 variables, 0/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 292/292 variables, and 303 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved in 7428 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 160/160 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 13268ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 160 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 13270ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 124/140 places, 168/184 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 13469 ms. Remains : 124/140 places, 168/184 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:22:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 168 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:22:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17912558688524064613.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10236088306294315019.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17912558688524064613.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10236088306294315019.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.69685e+09,0.712308,25984,2,9761,5,126617,6,0,667,80931,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EX(EG((((((StartSecuring_0+StartSecuring_1)+(StartSecuring_2+StartSecuring_3))+((StartSecuring_4+StartSecuring_5)+(StartSecuring_6+St...1684
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)),(((((StartSecuring_0+StartSecuring_1)+(StartSecuring_2+StartSecuring_3))+((StartSecur...1763
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 104/0/64
(forward)formula 0,1,5.39219,151456,1,0,7,771305,19,0,3883,471726,9
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N08-CTLCardinality-2024-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2024-05-30 12:22:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 12:22:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Total runtime 93083 ms.

BK_STOP 1717071768510

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N08"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N08, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r444-smll-171701110600025"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N08.tgz
mv UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N08 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;