Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r444-smll-171701110500010.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r444-smll-171701110500010
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 572K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.5K Apr 13 05:08 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 90K Apr 13 05:08 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K Apr 13 05:05 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 54K Apr 13 05:05 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K Apr 23 08:03 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K Apr 23 08:03 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.8K Apr 23 08:03 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K Apr 23 08:03 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K Apr 13 05:16 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 138K Apr 13 05:16 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Apr 13 05:13 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 123K Apr 13 05:13 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.9K Apr 23 08:03 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.0K Apr 23 08:03 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-CTLFireability-2024-12
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-CTLFireability-2024-13
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-CTLFireability-2024-14
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-CTLFireability-2024-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1717071234040

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is COL
CTLFireability COL
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-30 12:13:56] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-30 12:13:56] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-30 12:13:56] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2024-05-30 12:13:57] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2024-05-30 12:13:57] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 1185 ms
[2024-05-30 12:13:58] [INFO ] Imported 13 HL places and 12 HL transitions for a total of 72 PT places and 108.0 transition bindings in 31 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 32 ms.
[2024-05-30 12:13:58] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 13 places and 12 transitions 37 arcs in 7 ms.
[2024-05-30 12:13:58] [INFO ] Skeletonized 16 HLPN properties in 4 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Remains 9 properties that can be checked using skeleton over-approximation.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 1 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 18 to 17
RANDOM walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 986 ms. (40 steps per ms) remains 1/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 571 ms. (69 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 11 rows 13 cols
[2024-05-30 12:13:58] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 7 ms
Problem AtomicPropp5 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 7/24 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 156 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 219ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 9 simplifications.
[2024-05-30 12:13:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2024-05-30 12:13:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Transition timeout forces synchronizations/join behavior on parameter c of sort Cli
Domain [Cli(4), Z(2), Z(2)] of place MovetoZ breaks symmetries in sort Z
[2024-05-30 12:13:59] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 72 places and 108 transitions 340 arcs in 21 ms.
[2024-05-30 12:13:59] [INFO ] Unfolded 16 HLPN properties in 1 ms.
[2024-05-30 12:13:59] [INFO ] Reduced 4 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-30 12:13:59] [INFO ] Reduced 4 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-30 12:13:59] [INFO ] Reduced 4 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-30 12:13:59] [INFO ] Reduced 4 identical enabling conditions.
[2024-05-30 12:13:59] [INFO ] Reduced 4 identical enabling conditions.
Ensure Unique test removed 16 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 16 transitions.
Support contains 72 out of 72 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 72 /72 variables (removed 0) and now considering 92/92 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 72 cols
[2024-05-30 12:13:59] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 18 ms
[2024-05-30 12:13:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 104 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 12:13:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:13:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 131 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 249 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 88 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:13:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/72 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 92/164 variables, 72/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/164 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 164/164 variables, and 83 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 2645 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/72 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 92/164 variables, 72/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 88/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/164 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 164/164 variables, and 171 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 2481 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5234ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5241ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5524 ms. Remains : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Support contains 72 out of 72 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-30 12:14:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 34 to 30
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 370 ms. (107 steps per ms) remains 1/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 807 ms. (49 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2024-05-30 12:14:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Problem AtomicPropp18 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 32/164 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 29 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/11 constraints, State Equation: 0/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 68ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2024-05-30 12:14:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 64 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 64 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 13 ms. Remains 64 /72 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 64 cols
[2024-05-30 12:14:05] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned [43]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 86 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 63 /63 variables (removed 0) and now considering 84/84 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 101 ms. Remains : 63/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:14:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:14:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10549873481670665356.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8001948389065545572.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10549873481670665356.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8001948389065545572.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,143605,0.045342,4164,2,523,5,3618,6,0,339,2728,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG((((ControlRoomDispatch_3>=1)||(ControlRoomDispatch_2>=1))||((ControlRoomDispatch_1>=1)||(ControlRoomDispatch_0>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),(((ControlRoomDispatch_3>=1)||(ControlRoomDispatch_2>=1))||((ControlRoomDispatch_1>=1)||(ControlR...185
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 72/0/12
(forward)formula 0,1,0.190855,8904,1,0,7,30722,19,1,1690,18739,9
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-CTLFireability-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 72 /72 variables (removed 0) and now considering 92/92 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 72 cols
[2024-05-30 12:14:06] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned [51]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 64 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 71/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 71 /71 variables (removed 0) and now considering 92/92 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 66 ms. Remains : 71/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:14:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:14:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10726824948588483629.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability56493064389827338.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10726824948588483629.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability56493064389827338.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,208341,0.061124,5340,2,799,5,8932,6,0,379,6758,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((A((((((AG(AF((((((((IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(OpenRequests_1>=1))&&(Idles>=1))||(((IdleTechs_1>=1)&&(OpenRequests_3>=1))&&(Idles>=1)))||((((Id...6332
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,(!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !((((((EX(((((Assigned_2>=1)||(Assigned_3>=1))||((Assigned_4>=1)||(Assigned_5...13189
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 52/0/40
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,1.80594,50328,1,0,41,274867,61,25,2312,202677,44
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-CTLFireability-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 72 /72 variables (removed 0) and now considering 92/92 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:14:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:14:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 12:14:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:14:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 77 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 118 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-30 12:14:08] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 88 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:14:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/72 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 92/164 variables, 72/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/164 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 164/164 variables, and 83 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 2378 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/72 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 92/164 variables, 72/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 88/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/164 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 164/164 variables, and 171 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 3435 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5867ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5873ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6007 ms. Remains : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:14:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:14:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6319742337707466811.gal : 9 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10206854048667945616.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6319742337707466811.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10206854048667945616.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,208341,0.142914,6164,2,1319,5,14246,6,0,383,10139,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EG(AF(((((((((((IdleTechs_0<1)||(OpenRequests_1<1))||(Idles<1))&&(((IdleTechs_1<1)||(OpenRequests_3<1))||(Idles<1)))&&((((IdleTechs_1<1...5632
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(Init * !(EG(!(EG(!(((((((((((IdleTechs_0<1)||(OpenRequests_1<1))||(Idles<1))&&(((IdleTechs_1<1)||(OpenReques...5751
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,4.89333,108052,1,0,13,604478,46,3,2269,402330,15
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-CTLFireability-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 16 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 16 transitions
Performed 16 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 72 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 56 transition count 68
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 55 transition count 60
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 55 transition count 60
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 51 transition count 56
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 51 transition count 56
Applied a total of 50 rules in 47 ms. Remains 51 /72 variables (removed 21) and now considering 56/92 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 51 cols
[2024-05-30 12:14:19] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 97 ms returned [34]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 99 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 50/72 places, 56/92 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 46 transition count 52
Applied a total of 8 rules in 15 ms. Remains 46 /50 variables (removed 4) and now considering 52/56 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 52 rows 46 cols
[2024-05-30 12:14:19] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 12:14:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:14:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 111 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 179 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 46/72 places, 52/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 341 ms. Remains : 46/72 places, 52/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:14:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 52 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:14:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14225551057205419528.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12246178263121116866.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14225551057205419528.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12246178263121116866.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,44639,0.023148,3716,2,287,5,1360,6,0,239,960,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((((!(E(!(EG((((ControlRoomDispatch_3>=1)||(ControlRoomDispatch_2>=1))||((ControlRoomDispatch_1>=1)||(ControlRoomDispatch_0>=1))))) U ...1185
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((StartSecuring_7>=1)&&(ClientsWaiting_3>=1)))) * !(((((StartSecuring_1>=1)&&(Cli...1246
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.130039,6120,1,0,29,15783,31,18,1154,13180,23
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-CTLFireability-2024-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 64 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 64 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 3 ms. Remains 64 /72 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 64 cols
[2024-05-30 12:14:19] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 12:14:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:14:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 98 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 148 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 80 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:14:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/64 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 84/148 variables, 64/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 148/148 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 2157 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/64 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 84/148 variables, 64/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 80/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 148/148 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 2422 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4622ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4624ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4777 ms. Remains : 64/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:14:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:14:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11093792227297222282.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3077197783314705652.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11093792227297222282.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3077197783314705652.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,143605,0.110649,5584,2,1225,5,10673,6,0,343,7333,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AF((((((((IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(OpenRequests_1>=1))&&(Idles>=1))||(((IdleTechs_1>=1)&&(OpenRequests_3>=1))&&(Idles>=1)))||((((IdleTechs_1>=...2606
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG(Init,!((((((((IdleTechs_0>=1)&&(OpenRequests_1>=1))&&(Idles>=1))||(((IdleTechs_1>=1)&&(OpenRequests_3>=1...3508
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 52/101/32
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 40/44/44
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 40/32/44
(forward)formula 0,1,0.816367,19756,1,0,18,89839,52,8,2154,58971,20
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-CTLFireability-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 64 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 64 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 3 ms. Remains 64 /72 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:14:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:14:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 12:14:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:14:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 84 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 138 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 80 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:14:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/64 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 84/148 variables, 64/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 148/148 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 2180 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/64 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 84/148 variables, 64/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 80/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 148/148 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 2330 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4545ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4547ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4689 ms. Remains : 64/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:14:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:14:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10042083454655091539.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17641053097105056419.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10042083454655091539.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17641053097105056419.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,143605,0.101342,5584,2,1225,5,10673,6,0,343,7333,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EX(((((Assigned_2<1)&&(Assigned_3<1))&&((Assigned_4<1)&&(Assigned_5<1)))&&(((Assigned_6<1)&&(Assigned_7<1))&&((Assigned_0<1)&&(Assign...499
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * EX(((((Assigned_2<1)&&(Assigned_3<1))&&((Assigned_4<1)&&(Assigned_5<1)))&&(((Assigned_6...549
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 56/56/28
(forward)formula 0,0,0.891942,21796,1,0,9,93824,20,2,1822,65486,10
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-CTLFireability-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 72 /72 variables (removed 0) and now considering 92/92 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 72 cols
[2024-05-30 12:14:31] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 12:14:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:14:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 110 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 88 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:14:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/72 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 92/164 variables, 72/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/164 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 164/164 variables, and 83 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 2677 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/72 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 92/164 variables, 72/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 88/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/164 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 164/164 variables, and 171 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 3246 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5958ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5960ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6072 ms. Remains : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:14:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:14:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16787107397100156303.gal : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17753391877751046606.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16787107397100156303.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17753391877751046606.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,208341,0.139134,6168,2,1319,5,14246,6,0,383,10139,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((!(EX(!(EX((((((StartSecuring_5>=1)&&(ClientsWaiting_2>=1))||((StartSecuring_4>=1)&&(ClientsWaiting_2>=1)))||(((StartSecuring_0>=1)&&(C...4099
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,(!(EX(!(EX((((((StartSecuring_5>=1)&&(ClientsWaiting_2>=1))||((StartSecuring_4>=1)&&(ClientsWaiti...4988
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,1.26179,30896,1,0,6,167212,22,0,1860,86382,6
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-CTLFireability-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 72 /72 variables (removed 0) and now considering 92/92 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:14:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:14:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 12:14:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:14:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 118 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 167 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-30 12:14:38] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 88 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:14:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/72 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 92/164 variables, 72/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/164 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 164/164 variables, and 83 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 2863 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/72 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 92/164 variables, 72/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 88/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/164 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 164/164 variables, and 171 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 3157 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6069ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6071ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6252 ms. Remains : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:14:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:14:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16159878117208309729.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2942665707540884284.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16159878117208309729.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2942665707540884284.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,208341,0.144028,6160,2,1319,5,14246,6,0,383,10139,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((((A(AF((((((Finished_1>=1)||(Finished_0>=1))||((Finished_3>=1)||(Finished_2>=1)))||(((Assigned_2>=1)||(Assigned_3>=1))||((Assigned_...2016
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((((!((E(!(E(!(E(TRUE U !(!((((((NumClientsReq<1)||(DoSecuring_1<1))&&((NumClientsReq<1)||(DoSecur...4366
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,2.61979,62188,1,0,66,353085,42,41,2143,242103,53
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-CTLFireability-2024-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 64 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 64 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 6 ms. Remains 64 /72 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 64 cols
[2024-05-30 12:14:47] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned [43]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 53 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 63 /63 variables (removed 0) and now considering 84/84 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 64 ms. Remains : 63/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:14:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:14:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3103476653444331433.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5100154070465294915.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3103476653444331433.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5100154070465294915.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,143605,0.048215,4236,2,523,5,3618,6,0,339,2728,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EF((((Finished_1>=1)||(Finished_0>=1))||((Finished_3>=1)||(Finished_2>=1)))) * ((EG((((((StartSecuring_3>=1)&&(ClientsTimeout_1>=1))|...2061
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(E(TRUE U (((Finished_1>=1)||(Finished_0>=1))||((Finished_3>=1)||(Finished_2>=1)))) * ((EG((((((Start...2110
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.888412,22956,1,0,57,96866,29,48,1754,133106,59
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-CTLFireability-2024-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 72 /72 variables (removed 0) and now considering 92/92 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 72 cols
[2024-05-30 12:14:48] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 12:14:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:14:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 90 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 140 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-30 12:14:48] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 88 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:14:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/72 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 92/164 variables, 72/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/164 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 164/164 variables, and 83 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 2731 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/72 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 92/164 variables, 72/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 88/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/164 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 164/164 variables, and 171 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 3100 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5880ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5882ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6037 ms. Remains : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:14:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:14:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6465968502218761144.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16322622649860265338.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6465968502218761144.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16322622649860265338.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,208341,0.140332,6164,2,1319,5,14246,6,0,383,10139,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(AG((!(E(!((((((NumClientsReq<1)||(DoSecuring_1<1))&&((NumClientsReq<1)||(DoSecuring_2<1)))&&(((NumClientsReq<1)||(DoSecuring_3<1))&&(...3395
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !((!(E(!((((((NumClientsReq<1)||(DoSecuring_1<1))&&((NumClientsReq<1)||(DoSecuring_2<1)...3472
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 64/0/28
(forward)formula 0,0,2.58133,61080,1,0,25,344514,47,11,2408,239936,25
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-CTLFireability-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 16 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 16 transitions
Performed 16 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 72 transition count 76
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 56 transition count 68
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 55 transition count 60
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 55 transition count 60
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 51 transition count 56
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 51 transition count 56
Applied a total of 50 rules in 8 ms. Remains 51 /72 variables (removed 21) and now considering 56/92 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 51 cols
[2024-05-30 12:14:57] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned [34]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 64 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 50/72 places, 56/92 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 46 transition count 52
Applied a total of 8 rules in 4 ms. Remains 46 /50 variables (removed 4) and now considering 52/56 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 52 rows 46 cols
[2024-05-30 12:14:57] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 12:14:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:14:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 103 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 46/72 places, 52/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 180 ms. Remains : 46/72 places, 52/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:14:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 52 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:14:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11847750084201553973.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18423156949609513557.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11847750084201553973.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18423156949609513557.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,44639,0.014031,3712,2,287,5,1360,6,0,239,960,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(E((((Clients_0>=1)||(Clients_1>=1))||((Clients_2>=1)||(Clients_3>=1))) U EG((((((StartSecuring_3>=1)&&(ClientsTimeout_1>=1))||((StartS...488
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E((((Clients_0>=1)||(Clients_1>=1))||((Clients_2>=1)||(Clients_3>=1))) U EG((((((StartSecuring_3>=1...533
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 44/0/8
(forward)formula 0,1,0.075371,5876,1,0,9,13999,29,2,1190,6821,9
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-CTLFireability-2024-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 64 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 64 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 3 ms. Remains 64 /72 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 64 cols
[2024-05-30 12:14:57] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-30 12:14:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 12:14:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:14:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 129 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 210 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 80 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:14:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/64 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 84/148 variables, 64/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 148/148 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 2342 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/64 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 84/148 variables, 64/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 80/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 148/148 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 2779 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5166ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5168ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5382 ms. Remains : 64/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:15:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 12:15:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 12:15:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:15:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 12:15:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 12:15:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2444618823627816821.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 12:15:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11286414723984505196.ctl : 9 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2444618823627816821.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11286414723984505196.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,143605,0.113399,5584,2,1225,5,10673,6,0,343,7333,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EF(AX(((((ControlRoomDispatch_3>=1)||(ControlRoomDispatch_2>=1))||((ControlRoomDispatch_1>=1)||(ControlRoomDispatch_0>=1)))&&(((((NumC...490
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * !(EX(!(((((ControlRoomDispatch_3>=1)||(ControlRoomDispatch_2>=1))||((ControlRoomDispatch...548
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.621586,14276,1,0,9,56518,12,2,1786,27359,7
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-CTLFireability-2024-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 64 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 64 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 4 ms. Remains 64 /72 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:15:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:15:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned [43]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 54 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 63 /63 variables (removed 0) and now considering 84/84 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 59 ms. Remains : 63/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:15:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 12:15:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 12:15:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:15:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 12:15:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 12:15:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10025644708250404298.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 12:15:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1787024354830982208.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10025644708250404298.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1787024354830982208.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,143605,0.048393,4232,2,523,5,3618,6,0,339,2728,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((AG(AF(((((((StartSecuring_3>=1)&&(ClientsTimeout_1>=1))||((StartSecuring_1>=1)&&(ClientsTimeout_0>=1)))||(((StartSecuring_6>=1)&&(Cl...1735
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((!(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!(((((((StartSecuring_3>=1)&&(ClientsTimeout_1>=1))||((StartSecuring_1>=1)&&(Cl...1977
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,1.14867,29192,1,0,16,189212,50,7,1697,88141,17
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-CTLFireability-2024-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 64 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 64 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 3 ms. Remains 64 /72 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:15:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:15:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 12:15:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:15:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 88 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 127 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 80 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:15:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/64 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 84/148 variables, 64/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 148/148 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 2354 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/64 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 84/148 variables, 64/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 80/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 148/148 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 2813 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5195ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5197ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5327 ms. Remains : 64/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:15:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 12:15:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 12:15:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:15:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 12:15:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 12:15:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15784548977983910588.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 12:15:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11206827516197496137.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15784548977983910588.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11206827516197496137.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,143605,0.111283,5584,2,1225,5,10673,6,0,343,7333,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(((((EF((((ClientsWaiting_1<1)&&(ClientsWaiting_0<1))&&((ClientsWaiting_3<1)&&(ClientsWaiting_2<1)))) * !(E(AF(((((Assigned_2>=1)||(As...3235
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((Init * !(!(EX(!(((((E(TRUE U (((ClientsWaiting_1<1)&&(ClientsWaiting_0<1))&&((ClientsWaiting_3<1)&&(Clien...9278
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,1.57919,36328,1,0,14,201915,40,3,1980,106623,19
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-CTLFireability-2024-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 64 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 64 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 3 ms. Remains 64 /72 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:15:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:15:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 12:15:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:15:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 98 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 152 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 80 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:15:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/64 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 84/148 variables, 64/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 148/148 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 2083 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/64 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 84/148 variables, 64/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 80/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 148/148 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 1829 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3944ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3946ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4102 ms. Remains : 64/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:15:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 12:15:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 12:15:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:15:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 12:15:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 12:15:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8643734073392597955.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 12:15:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7695408740567288412.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8643734073392597955.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7695408740567288412.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,143605,0.110614,5584,2,1225,5,10673,6,0,343,7333,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AF(((AF((((Finished_1>=1)||(Finished_0>=1))||((Finished_3>=1)||(Finished_2>=1)))) + EF((((ClientsWaiting_1>=1)||(ClientsWaiting_0>=1)...3392
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(EG(!(((!(EG(!((((Finished_1>=1)||(Finished_0>=1))||((Finished_3>=1)||(Finished_2>=1)))))) + E(TR...3491
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 68/0/16
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,2.29071,63068,1,0,47,365400,71,29,2126,213427,44
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-CTLFireability-2024-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 92/92 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 64 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 64 transition count 84
Applied a total of 16 rules in 9 ms. Remains 64 /72 variables (removed 8) and now considering 84/92 (removed 8) transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:15:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 12:15:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned [43]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 56 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 63 /63 variables (removed 0) and now considering 84/84 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 71 ms. Remains : 63/72 places, 84/92 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:15:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 12:15:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 12:15:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2024-05-30 12:15:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 12:15:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 12:15:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17419875005399473063.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 12:15:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6915135039530853896.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17419875005399473063.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6915135039530853896.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,143605,0.02873,4240,2,523,5,3618,6,0,339,2728,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AF((((((((StartSecuring_5<1)||(ClientsWaiting_2<1))&&((StartSecuring_4<1)||(ClientsWaiting_2<1)))&&(((StartSecuring_0<1)||(ClientsWai...1108
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!(EG(!((((((((StartSecuring_5<1)||(ClientsWaiting_2<1))&&((StartSecuring_4<1)||(Clien...1175
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.165788,8728,1,0,9,32372,33,2,1749,14501,10
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04-CTLFireability-2024-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2024-05-30 12:15:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 12:15:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Total runtime 82203 ms.

BK_STOP 1717071318787

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r444-smll-171701110500010"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04.tgz
mv UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z2T3N04 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;