About the Execution of GreatSPN+red for UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02
| Execution Summary | |||||
| Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
| 448.852 | 59176.00 | 97777.00 | 538.70 | FFFFFFFTFFFFFFFF | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r443-smll-171701109800107.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool greatspnxred
Input is UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02, examination is LTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r443-smll-171701109800107
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 556K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Apr 13 05:44 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 109K Apr 13 05:44 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K Apr 13 05:40 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 49K Apr 13 05:40 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.3K Apr 23 08:04 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K Apr 23 08:04 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.9K Apr 23 08:04 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 23 08:04 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K Apr 13 05:51 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 135K Apr 13 05:51 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K Apr 13 05:48 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 92K Apr 13 05:48 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.0K Apr 23 08:04 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.0K Apr 23 08:04 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K May 18 16:43 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-00
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-01
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-02
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-03
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-04
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-05
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-06
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-07
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-08
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-09
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1717065306246
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=greatspnxred
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Applying reductions before tool greatspn
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-30 10:35:08] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLCardinality, -timeout, 360, -rebuildPNML]
[2024-05-30 10:35:08] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-30 10:35:08] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2024-05-30 10:35:09] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2024-05-30 10:35:09] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 1227 ms
[2024-05-30 10:35:09] [INFO ] Imported 13 HL places and 12 HL transitions for a total of 80 PT places and 150.0 transition bindings in 30 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLCardinality.xml in 45 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
[2024-05-30 10:35:09] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 13 places and 12 transitions 37 arcs in 7 ms.
[2024-05-30 10:35:09] [INFO ] Skeletonized 16 HLPN properties in 4 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Remains 15 properties that can be checked using skeleton over-approximation.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 1 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
RANDOM walk for 40001 steps (8 resets) in 2094 ms. (19 steps per ms) remains 6/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 582 ms. (68 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 406 ms. (98 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 226 ms. (176 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (8 resets) in 381 ms. (104 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 379 ms. (105 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 342 ms. (116 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 11 rows 13 cols
[2024-05-30 10:35:11] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 3 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp2 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp3 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp5 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp18 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp24 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp27 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 12/24 variables, and 4 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 6 solved, 0 unsolved in 309 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/13 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 356ms problems are : Problem set: 6 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 6 atomic propositions for a total of 15 simplifications.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-30 10:35:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2024-05-30 10:35:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Domain [Cli(2), Z(4), Z(4)] of place MovetoZ breaks symmetries in sort Z
Transition timeout forces synchronizations/join behavior on parameter c of sort Cli
[2024-05-30 10:35:11] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 80 places and 150 transitions 482 arcs in 33 ms.
[2024-05-30 10:35:11] [INFO ] Unfolded 10 HLPN properties in 1 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 32 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 32 transitions.
Support contains 78 out of 80 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 80/80 places, 118/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 14 ms. Remains 80 /80 variables (removed 0) and now considering 118/118 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 118 rows 80 cols
[2024-05-30 10:35:12] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 16 ms
[2024-05-30 10:35:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 118 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 10:35:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 10:35:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 176 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 314 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 116 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 10:35:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/80 variables, 5/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 118/198 variables, 80/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/198 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 198/198 variables, and 87 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved in 4041 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 80/80 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/80 variables, 5/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 118/198 variables, 80/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 116/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/198 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 198/198 variables, and 203 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved in 4052 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 80/80 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 8343ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8354ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8712 ms. Remains : 80/80 places, 118/118 transitions.
Support contains 78 out of 80 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-30 10:35:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2024-05-30 10:35:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2024-05-30 10:35:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 118 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 630 ms. (63 steps per ms) remains 1/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 96 ms. (412 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2024-05-30 10:35:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp10 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 71/198 variables, and 3 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 90 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/7 constraints, State Equation: 0/80 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 102ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 10 simplifications.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 10 out of 80 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 80/80 places, 118/118 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 32 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 32 transitions
Performed 32 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 32
Iterating post reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 80 transition count 86
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 48 transition count 78
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 45 transition count 54
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 45 transition count 54
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 84 place count 39 transition count 48
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 39 transition count 48
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 34 transition count 44
Applied a total of 99 rules in 58 ms. Remains 34 /80 variables (removed 46) and now considering 44/118 (removed 74) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 34 cols
[2024-05-30 10:35:21] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 10:35:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned [26, 27]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 62 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 32/80 places, 44/118 transitions.
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 32 transition count 36
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 24 transition count 36
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 22 transition count 34
Applied a total of 20 rules in 6 ms. Remains 22 /32 variables (removed 10) and now considering 34/44 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 34 rows 22 cols
[2024-05-30 10:35:21] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 10:35:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 22 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 10:35:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 10:35:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 40 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 64 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 22/80 places, 34/118 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 190 ms. Remains : 22/80 places, 34/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 232 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-00
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 7346 reset in 563 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 274 steps with 21 reset with depth 17 and stack size 17 in 3 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-00 finished in 1101 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((p0 U p1)))'
Support contains 11 out of 80 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 80/80 places, 118/118 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 56 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 56 transition count 94
Applied a total of 48 rules in 5 ms. Remains 56 /80 variables (removed 24) and now considering 94/118 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 56 cols
[2024-05-30 10:35:22] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-30 10:35:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 78 ms returned [40]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 79 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 55/80 places, 94/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 55 /55 variables (removed 0) and now considering 94/94 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 86 ms. Remains : 55/80 places, 94/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 137 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), true]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-03
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 50 steps with 9 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-03 finished in 240 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G(p0)))'
Support contains 4 out of 80 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 80/80 places, 118/118 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 56 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 56 transition count 94
Applied a total of 48 rules in 5 ms. Remains 56 /80 variables (removed 24) and now considering 94/118 (removed 24) transitions.
[2024-05-30 10:35:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 10:35:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 141 ms returned [40, 41]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 142 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/80 places, 94/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 94/94 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 149 ms. Remains : 54/80 places, 94/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 101 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-04
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-04 finished in 265 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)&&F(G(p1)))))'
Support contains 4 out of 80 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 80/80 places, 118/118 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 32 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 32 transitions
Performed 32 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 32
Iterating post reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 80 transition count 86
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 48 transition count 78
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 48 transition count 70
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 40 transition count 70
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 91 place count 37 transition count 46
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 37 transition count 46
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 100 place count 31 transition count 40
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 31 transition count 40
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 112 place count 25 transition count 28
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 25 transition count 28
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 124 place count 19 transition count 22
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 19 transition count 22
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 19 transition count 16
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 19 transition count 14
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 17 transition count 14
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 15 transition count 12
Applied a total of 144 rules in 21 ms. Remains 15 /80 variables (removed 65) and now considering 12/118 (removed 106) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 12 rows 15 cols
[2024-05-30 10:35:23] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-30 10:35:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned [0, 5, 6]
[2024-05-30 10:35:23] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [0, 6]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 64 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 13/80 places, 12/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 13 /13 variables (removed 0) and now considering 12/12 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 87 ms. Remains : 13/80 places, 12/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 154 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-06
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 271 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 14 steps with 0 reset with depth 15 and stack size 15 in 0 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-06 finished in 535 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X((X((p0&&X(F(p1))))||(p2 U (p3||G(p2)))))))'
Support contains 69 out of 80 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 80/80 places, 118/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 80 /80 variables (removed 0) and now considering 118/118 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 118 rows 80 cols
[2024-05-30 10:35:23] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-30 10:35:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 206 ms returned [65]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 224 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 79/80 places, 118/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 79 /79 variables (removed 0) and now considering 118/118 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 227 ms. Remains : 79/80 places, 118/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 502 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3) (NOT p2)), true, (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-07
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 13706 reset in 271 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 13664 reset in 469 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3) (NOT p2) p0), (X (X (NOT p3)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (AND (NOT p3) p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) p2)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2)))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 349 ms. Reduced automaton from 9 states, 16 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 9 states, 16 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 498 ms :[(NOT p1), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), true, (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)))]
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 12 to 10
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 323 ms. (123 steps per ms) remains 2/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 422 ms. (94 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 255 ms. (156 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 118 rows 79 cols
[2024-05-30 10:35:26] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 3 ms
Problem apf9 is UNSAT
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem apf2 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 79/197 variables, and 6 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved in 63 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 98ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Found 2 invariant AP formulas.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3) (NOT p2) p0), (X (X (NOT p3))), (G (OR p3 p1 (NOT p2))), (G (OR p0 p3 (NOT p2)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (AND (NOT p3) p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) p2)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2))))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p3) (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (OR p3 (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (OR p0 p3 p2))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2)))), (F p1), (F p2), (F p3), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p3 (NOT p2))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 651 ms. Reduced automaton from 9 states, 16 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 8 states, 12 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 459 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (NOT p1), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 454 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (NOT p1), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), true]
[2024-05-30 10:35:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 10:35:28] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 6 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2024-05-30 10:35:28] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 84 ms returned sat
[2024-05-30 10:35:28] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-05-30 10:35:28] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 6 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2024-05-30 10:35:28] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 91 ms returned sat
[2024-05-30 10:35:28] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 116/178/116 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 19 ms.
[2024-05-30 10:35:29] [INFO ] Added : 116 causal constraints over 24 iterations in 470 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))
[2024-05-30 10:35:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 10:35:29] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 6 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2024-05-30 10:35:29] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 93 ms returned sat
[2024-05-30 10:35:29] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-05-30 10:35:29] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 6 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2024-05-30 10:35:29] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 89 ms returned sat
[2024-05-30 10:35:29] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 116/178/116 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 16 ms.
[2024-05-30 10:35:30] [INFO ] Added : 116 causal constraints over 24 iterations in 456 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))
Support contains 69 out of 79 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 118/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 79 /79 variables (removed 0) and now considering 118/118 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 10:35:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 10:35:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 10:35:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 10:35:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 119 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 178 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 116 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 10:35:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/79 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 118/197 variables, 79/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/197 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 197/197 variables, and 85 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved in 4094 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/79 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 118/197 variables, 79/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 116/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/197 variables, 0/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 197/197 variables, and 201 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved in 4798 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 8987ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8996ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9177 ms. Remains : 79/79 places, 118/118 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2) p0 (NOT p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p2)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 177 ms. Reduced automaton from 8 states, 12 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 8 states, 12 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 435 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (NOT p1), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), true]
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 8 to 7
RANDOM walk for 173 steps (0 resets) in 10 ms. (15 steps per ms) remains 0/7 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p3) (NOT p2) p0 (NOT p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (F (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p3)))), (F p3), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)))), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p3))), (F (NOT (OR p0 p3))), (F p2), (F p1)]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 433 ms. Reduced automaton from 8 states, 12 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 8 states, 12 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 442 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (NOT p1), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 423 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (NOT p1), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), true]
[2024-05-30 10:35:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 10:35:41] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 6 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2024-05-30 10:35:41] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 74 ms returned sat
[2024-05-30 10:35:41] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-05-30 10:35:41] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 6 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2024-05-30 10:35:41] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 88 ms returned sat
[2024-05-30 10:35:41] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 116/178/116 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 17 ms.
[2024-05-30 10:35:42] [INFO ] Added : 116 causal constraints over 24 iterations in 445 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))
[2024-05-30 10:35:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 10:35:42] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 6 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2024-05-30 10:35:42] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 90 ms returned sat
[2024-05-30 10:35:42] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-05-30 10:35:42] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 6 positive place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2024-05-30 10:35:42] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 82 ms returned sat
[2024-05-30 10:35:43] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 116/178/116 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 15 ms.
[2024-05-30 10:35:43] [INFO ] Added : 116 causal constraints over 24 iterations in 433 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 425 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (NOT p1), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), true]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 13612 reset in 302 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 13703 reset in 471 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [false, true, true, false, false, false, false, true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 533 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (NOT p1), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), true]
Support contains 69 out of 79 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 118/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 79 /79 variables (removed 0) and now considering 118/118 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 10:35:45] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 5 ms returned []
Running 116 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 10:35:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/79 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 118/197 variables, 79/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/197 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 197/197 variables, and 85 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved in 3556 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/79 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 118/197 variables, 79/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 116/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/197 variables, 0/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 197/197 variables, and 201 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved in 4244 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 7882ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7885ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7912 ms. Remains : 79/79 places, 118/118 transitions.
Support contains 69 out of 79 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 118/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 79 /79 variables (removed 0) and now considering 118/118 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 10:35:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 10:35:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 10:35:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 10:35:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 97 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 146 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 116 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 10:35:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/79 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 118/197 variables, 79/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/197 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 197/197 variables, and 85 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved in 3784 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/79 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 118/197 variables, 79/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 116/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/197 variables, 0/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 197/197 variables, and 201 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved in 4703 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 8567ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8571ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8719 ms. Remains : 79/79 places, 118/118 transitions.
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-07 finished in 38556 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 80 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 80/80 places, 118/118 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 56 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 56 transition count 94
Applied a total of 48 rules in 4 ms. Remains 56 /80 variables (removed 24) and now considering 94/118 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 56 cols
[2024-05-30 10:36:02] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 10:36:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 81 ms returned [40, 41]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 83 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/80 places, 94/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 94/94 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 89 ms. Remains : 54/80 places, 94/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 79 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-09
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-09 finished in 196 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((p0 U (p1 U G(p0)))&&G(F(p1))))'
Support contains 43 out of 80 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 80/80 places, 118/118 transitions.
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 80 transition count 110
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 72 transition count 110
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 70 transition count 108
Applied a total of 20 rules in 15 ms. Remains 70 /80 variables (removed 10) and now considering 108/118 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 108 rows 70 cols
[2024-05-30 10:36:02] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 9 ms
[2024-05-30 10:36:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 96 ms returned [54]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 98 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 69/80 places, 108/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 69 /69 variables (removed 0) and now considering 108/108 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 120 ms. Remains : 69/80 places, 108/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 265 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), true, (NOT p0), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-10
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 12 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-10 finished in 404 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 80 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 80/80 places, 118/118 transitions.
Performed 32 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 32
Iterating post reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 80 transition count 86
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 48 transition count 78
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 48 transition count 70
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 40 transition count 70
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 91 place count 37 transition count 46
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 37 transition count 46
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 100 place count 31 transition count 40
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 31 transition count 40
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 112 place count 25 transition count 28
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 25 transition count 28
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 124 place count 19 transition count 22
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 19 transition count 22
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 19 transition count 16
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 19 transition count 14
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 17 transition count 14
Applied a total of 140 rules in 47 ms. Remains 17 /80 variables (removed 63) and now considering 14/118 (removed 104) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 14 rows 17 cols
[2024-05-30 10:36:02] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-30 10:36:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned [0]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 36 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 16/80 places, 14/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 16 /16 variables (removed 0) and now considering 14/14 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 85 ms. Remains : 16/80 places, 14/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 43 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-11
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 160 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 16 steps with 0 reset with depth 17 and stack size 17 in 0 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-11 finished in 308 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 12 out of 80 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 80/80 places, 118/118 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 32 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 32 transitions
Performed 32 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 32
Iterating post reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 80 transition count 86
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 48 transition count 78
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 48 transition count 70
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 40 transition count 70
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 91 place count 37 transition count 46
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 37 transition count 46
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 35 transition count 44
Applied a total of 98 rules in 9 ms. Remains 35 /80 variables (removed 45) and now considering 44/118 (removed 74) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 35 cols
[2024-05-30 10:36:03] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 10:36:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned [0, 19, 20]
[2024-05-30 10:36:03] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [0, 20]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 56 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 33/80 places, 44/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 33 /33 variables (removed 0) and now considering 44/44 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 68 ms. Remains : 33/80 places, 44/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 83 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-12
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 5863 reset in 280 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 911 steps with 54 reset with depth 15 and stack size 15 in 4 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-12 finished in 450 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G((p0&&X(p1)))))'
Support contains 14 out of 80 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 80/80 places, 118/118 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 56 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 56 transition count 94
Applied a total of 48 rules in 3 ms. Remains 56 /80 variables (removed 24) and now considering 94/118 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 56 cols
[2024-05-30 10:36:03] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 10:36:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 86 ms returned [40, 41]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 92 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/80 places, 94/118 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 54 /54 variables (removed 0) and now considering 94/94 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 97 ms. Remains : 54/80 places, 94/118 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 141 ms :[true, (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-14
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-14 finished in 255 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X((X((p0&&X(F(p1))))||(p2 U (p3||G(p2)))))))'
[2024-05-30 10:36:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-30 10:36:04] [INFO ] Export to MCC of 1 properties in file /home/mcc/execution/LTLCardinality.sr.xml took 2 ms.
[2024-05-30 10:36:04] [INFO ] Export to PNML in file /home/mcc/execution/model.sr.pnml of net with 80 places, 118 transitions and 354 arcs took 6 ms.
Total runtime 55995 ms.
There are residual formulas that ITS could not solve within timeout
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GreatSPN-meddly tool, MCC 2023
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Running UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02
IS_COLORED=
IS_NUPN=
LOADING PETRI NET FILE /home/mcc/execution/413/model.pnml (PNML) ...
PNML VERSION 2009, P/T NET.
COLOR CLASSES: 0
CONSTANTS: 0
PLACES: 80
TRANSITIONS: 118
COLOR VARS: 0
MEASURES: 0
LOADING TIME: [User 0.003s, Sys 0.001s]
SAVING FILE /home/mcc/execution/413/model (.net / .def) ...
EXPORT TIME: [User 0.001s, Sys 0.000s]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GreatSPN/Meddly.
Copyright (C) 1987-2022, University of Torino, Italy.
website: https://github.com/greatspn/SOURCES
Based on MEDDLY version 0.16.0
Copyright (C) 2009, Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc.
website: http://meddly.sourceforge.net
Process ID: 1178
MODEL NAME: /home/mcc/execution/413/model
80 places, 118 transitions.
Creating all event NSFs..
Creating all event NSFs..
Creating all event NSFs..
Creating all event NSFs..
Split: SplitSubtract
Start RS construction.
Split: SplitSubtract
Start RS construction.
Building monolithic NSF...
FORMULA UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02-LTLCardinality-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS PARALLEL_PROCESSING UNFOLDING_TO_PT USE_NUPN TOPOLOGICAL
Ok.
EXITCODE: 0
----------------------------------------------------------------------
BK_STOP 1717065365422
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLCardinality -timeout 360 -rebuildPNML
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="greatspnxred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool greatspnxred"
echo " Input is UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02, examination is LTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r443-smll-171701109800107"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02.tgz
mv UtilityControlRoom-COL-Z4T4N02 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;