Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r422-smll-171690574000274.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.....................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00004vD, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r422-smll-171690574000274
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 480K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.4K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 85K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.3K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 42K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.1K Apr 23 08:03 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K Apr 23 08:03 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.5K Apr 23 08:03 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 23 08:03 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K Apr 13 07:14 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 138K Apr 13 07:14 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.5K Apr 13 07:14 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 70K Apr 13 07:14 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K Apr 23 08:03 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K Apr 23 08:03 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 10 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.6K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00004vD-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00004vD-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00004vD-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00004vD-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00004vD-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00004vD-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00004vD-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00004vD-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00004vD-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00004vD-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00004vD-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00004vD-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00004vD-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00004vD-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00004vD-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00004vD-CTLFireability-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1717045947025

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00004vD
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-30 05:12:29] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-30 05:12:29] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-30 05:12:29] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 63 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:29] [INFO ] Transformed 8 places.
[2024-05-30 05:12:29] [INFO ] Transformed 6 transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:29] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 8 places and 6 transitions and 18 arcs in 291 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 41 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00004vD-CTLFireability-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 8 out of 8 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 8/8 places, 6/6 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 17 ms. Remains 8 /8 variables (removed 0) and now considering 6/6 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 6 rows 8 cols
[2024-05-30 05:12:30] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 6 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 221 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 05:12:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 05:12:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 587 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 5 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/8 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 6/14 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/14 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 14/14 variables, and 11 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 180 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/8 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 6/14 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/14 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 14/14 variables, and 16 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 121 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 338ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 356ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1002 ms. Remains : 8/8 places, 6/6 transitions.
Support contains 8 out of 8 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 6 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 24 to 19
RANDOM walk for 40001 steps (1288 resets) in 1027 ms. (38 steps per ms) remains 1/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 620 ms. (64 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2024-05-30 05:12:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp6 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 8/14 variables, and 3 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 34 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 0/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 43ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 15 simplifications.
[2024-05-30 05:12:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 6 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 8/8 places, 6/6 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 8 /8 variables (removed 0) and now considering 6/6 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 05:12:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 05:12:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 05:12:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 36 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 70 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 5 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/8 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 6/14 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/14 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 14/14 variables, and 11 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 110 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/8 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 6/14 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/14 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 14/14 variables, and 16 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 102 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 225ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 226ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 297 ms. Remains : 8/8 places, 6/6 transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 6 transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability651887086794189069.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2262740488824300870.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability651887086794189069.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2262740488824300870.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,32,0.02006,3204,2,73,5,307,6,0,41,244,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((A((((AX(((resA>=1)&&(Clients>=1))) * ((haveA2andB>=1)||((resA>=1)&&(Clients>=1)))) + AG((haveAandB>=1))) * AF((((resA>=1)&&(haveB>=1)...271
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY(Init) * !(EG(!((EG((haveA2andB>=1)) * (haveA2andB>=1)))))) * !(E(!((EG((haveA2andB>=1)) * (haveA2andB>=1)...480
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/total) :0...161
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,0.045621,4080,1,0,155,2168,61,108,253,2221,267
FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00004vD-CTLFireability-2024-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 8/8 places, 6/6 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 8 /8 variables (removed 0) and now considering 6/6 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 05:12:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned [5]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 51 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 7/8 places, 6/6 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 7 /7 variables (removed 0) and now considering 6/6 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 53 ms. Remains : 7/8 places, 6/6 transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 6 transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5645629899953805422.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13548933657756444524.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5645629899953805422.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13548933657756444524.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,32,0.004717,3316,2,37,5,236,6,0,37,209,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((haveA2>=1) * EX((haveA2<1))) + ((haveA2andB>=1) * EF((AG((haveA2<1)) * AX(((resB<1)||(haveA<1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((haveA2>=1) * EX((haveA2<1))) + ((haveA2andB>=1) * E(TRUE U (!(E(TRUE U !((haveA2<1)))) * !(EX(!(...194
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/total) :0...161
(forward)formula 0,0,0.016705,3896,1,0,53,993,41,43,208,1126,67
FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00004vD-CTLFireability-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 8/8 places, 6/6 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 8 /8 variables (removed 0) and now considering 6/6 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 05:12:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 05:12:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 05:12:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 47 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 78 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 5 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/8 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 6/14 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/14 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 14/14 variables, and 11 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 109 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/8 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 6/14 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/14 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 14/14 variables, and 16 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 114 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 230ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 231ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 310 ms. Remains : 8/8 places, 6/6 transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 6 transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2895687962724841431.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1311194351746650790.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2895687962724841431.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1311194351746650790.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,32,0.005319,3320,2,73,5,307,6,0,41,244,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(((resA>=1)&&(Clients>=1))) + EX((haveA2andB>=1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !(EX((haveA2andB>=1))))) * !(((resA>=1)&&(Clients>=1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/total) :0...161
(forward)formula 0,1,0.010658,3636,1,0,23,702,28,13,230,572,21
FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00004vD-CTLFireability-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 8/8 places, 6/6 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 8 /8 variables (removed 0) and now considering 6/6 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 05:12:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 05:12:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 05:12:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 29 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 61 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-30 05:12:33] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 5 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/8 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 6/14 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/14 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 14/14 variables, and 11 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 89 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/8 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 6/14 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/14 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 14/14 variables, and 16 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 98 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 198ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 198ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 270 ms. Remains : 8/8 places, 6/6 transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 6 transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7084321661533965193.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13529726313972225352.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7084321661533965193.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13529726313972225352.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,32,0.006324,3320,2,73,5,307,6,0,41,244,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EG((((resB>=1)&&(haveA>=1)) + AG(((haveA2andB>=1)||((resA>=1)&&(Clients>=1)))))) + E(!(((resB<1)||(haveA<1))) U (haveA2andB>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(!(((resB<1)||(haveA<1))) U (haveA2andB>=1)))) * !(EG((((resB>=1)&&(haveA>=1)) + !(E(TRU...221
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/total) :0...161
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,0.021349,3900,1,0,50,1101,46,34,253,1014,73
FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00004vD-CTLFireability-2024-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 8/8 places, 6/6 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 8 /8 variables (removed 0) and now considering 6/6 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 05:12:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 20 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 05:12:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 05:12:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 27 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 50 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-30 05:12:33] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 5 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/8 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 6/14 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/14 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 14/14 variables, and 11 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 105 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/8 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 6/14 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/14 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 14/14 variables, and 16 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 91 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 201ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 202ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 259 ms. Remains : 8/8 places, 6/6 transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 6 transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7399923139258279811.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6806760997123524440.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7399923139258279811.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6806760997123524440.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,32,0.006334,3316,2,73,5,307,6,0,41,244,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(EF(((((resA<1)||(Clients<1))||(((resA<1)||(Clients<1))&&(haveA2andB<1)))&&(((resA>=1)&&(haveB>=1))||(haveA2>=1))))) * EF((AG(((resB<1...186
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU((Init * EG(E(TRUE U ((((resA<1)||(Clients<1))||(((resA<1)||(Clients<1))&&(haveA2andB<1)))&&(((resA>=1)&&...256
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/total) :0...161
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,0.023049,3896,1,0,22,1200,43,16,264,1107,37
FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00004vD-CTLFireability-2024-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 8/8 places, 6/6 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 8 /8 variables (removed 0) and now considering 6/6 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 05:12:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 05:12:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 05:12:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 60 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 98 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 5 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/8 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 6/14 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/14 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 14/14 variables, and 11 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 105 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/8 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 6/14 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/14 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 14/14 variables, and 16 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 116 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 226ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 227ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 326 ms. Remains : 8/8 places, 6/6 transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 6 transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10091241176719708049.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4069794340055864473.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10091241176719708049.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4069794340055864473.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,32,0.005395,3320,2,73,5,307,6,0,41,244,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((EF(((A((((resA>=1)&&(Clients>=1))&&(haveA2andB>=1)) U ((resA>=1)&&(Clients>=1))) * EX((haveA2andB>=1))) * (haveA2<1))) * (haveA2andB>...160
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U ((!((E(!(((resA>=1)&&(Clients>=1))) U (!((((resA>=1)&&(Clients>=1))&&(haveA2andB>=1))) ...318
(forward)formula 0,0,0.006425,3636,1,0,9,307,9,2,60,244,2
FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00004vD-CTLFireability-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 8/8 places, 6/6 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 8 /8 variables (removed 0) and now considering 6/6 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 21 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 25 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 48 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 5 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/8 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 6/14 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/14 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 14/14 variables, and 11 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 108 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/8 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 6/14 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/14 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 14/14 variables, and 16 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 83 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 195ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 196ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 245 ms. Remains : 8/8 places, 6/6 transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 6 transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14298775172463645638.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5158115020430662963.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14298775172463645638.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5158115020430662963.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,32,0.003736,3320,2,73,5,307,6,0,41,244,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((AF(((((AX((haveAandB<1)) + (resA<1)) + (Clients<1)) * ((resA<1)||(haveB<1))) * ((haveAandB<1)&&((resA<1)||(haveB<1))))) + (resB<1)) ...168
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(((((!(EX(!((haveAandB<1)))) + (resA<1)) + (Clients<1)) * ((resA<1)||(haveB<1))) * ((haveAa...273
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/total) :0...161
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,0.010724,3900,1,0,47,931,41,29,244,880,44
FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00004vD-CTLFireability-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 8/8 places, 6/6 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 8 /8 variables (removed 0) and now considering 6/6 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 31 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 61 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 5 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/8 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 6/14 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/14 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 14/14 variables, and 11 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 114 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/8 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 6/14 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/14 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 14/14 variables, and 16 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 96 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 218ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 218ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 280 ms. Remains : 8/8 places, 6/6 transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 6 transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15947176798035899515.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8885603060986278570.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15947176798035899515.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8885603060986278570.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,32,0.003632,3316,2,73,5,307,6,0,41,244,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((((EF((haveA2andB>=1)) + AG(((resA>=1)&&(haveB>=1)))) + (!(A(AX(((resA>=1)&&(Clients>=1))) U ((((resA>=1)&&(Clients>=1))||((resB>=1)&&...290
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * (haveA2andB>=1))] != FALSE + [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !(((resA>=1)&&(haveB>=1))))))] !...658
(forward)formula 0,1,0.005464,3632,1,0,8,312,9,1,86,253,4
FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00004vD-CTLFireability-2024-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 8/8 places, 6/6 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 8 /8 variables (removed 0) and now considering 6/6 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 21 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 49 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 5 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/8 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 6/14 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/14 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 14/14 variables, and 11 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 98 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/8 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 6/14 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/14 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 14/14 variables, and 16 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 73 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 177ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 177ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 226 ms. Remains : 8/8 places, 6/6 transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 6 transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2841793054757708810.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14408684038625955397.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2841793054757708810.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14408684038625955397.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,32,0.005767,3320,2,73,5,307,6,0,41,244,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EG((AG(A(((resA>=1)&&(Clients>=1)) U (haveA2>=1))) + !(AX((((resA>=1)&&(Clients>=1))||(haveA2>=1)))))) U !(((resB<1)||(haveA<1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,EG((!(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!((haveA2>=1)) U (!(((resA>=1)&&(Clients>=1))) * !((haveA2>=1)))) + EG(!((have...265
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/total) :0...161
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,0.025554,3900,1,0,97,1475,55,76,254,1531,183
FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00004vD-CTLFireability-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 8/8 places, 6/6 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 8 /8 variables (removed 0) and now considering 6/6 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 78 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 5 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/8 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 6/14 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/14 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 14/14 variables, and 11 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 101 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/8 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 6/14 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/14 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 14/14 variables, and 16 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 79 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 185ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 186ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 265 ms. Remains : 8/8 places, 6/6 transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 6 transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13786806838549804954.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12323981583723639025.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13786806838549804954.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12323981583723639025.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,32,0.006469,3324,2,73,5,307,6,0,41,244,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX((AF(((EG(((resA>=1)&&(Clients>=1))) * (resA>=1)) * (Clients>=1))) + !(E((haveA2>=1) U (haveAandB>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(EG(!(((EG(((resA>=1)&&(Clients>=1))) * (resA>=1)) * (Clients>=1))))))] != FALSE + [(E...222
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/total) :0...161
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,0.018776,3640,1,0,55,1072,40,41,236,960,85
FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00004vD-CTLFireability-2024-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 8/8 places, 6/6 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 8 /8 variables (removed 0) and now considering 6/6 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 25 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 29 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 56 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 5 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/8 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 6/14 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/14 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 14/14 variables, and 11 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 93 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/8 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 6/14 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/14 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 14/14 variables, and 16 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 100 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 199ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 200ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 257 ms. Remains : 8/8 places, 6/6 transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 6 transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10575387235012962900.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18346846208572964668.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10575387235012962900.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18346846208572964668.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,32,0.004549,3324,2,73,5,307,6,0,41,244,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(!(((resB<1)||(haveA<1))) U AX((haveA2andB>=1))) * (AF(((AF(((haveA2andB>=1)||((resA>=1)&&(Clients>=1)))) * AX(((resA<1)||(Clients<1)))...336
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(!(((resB<1)||(haveA<1))) U !(EX(!((haveA2andB>=1)))))))] = FALSE * ((([((FwdU(EY((Init * !(!(EG(!(...1169
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/total) :0...161
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,0.025615,3904,1,0,93,1603,66,61,251,1464,138
FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00004vD-CTLFireability-2024-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 8/8 places, 6/6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 8 transition count 5
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 7 transition count 5
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 6 transition count 4
Applied a total of 4 rules in 32 ms. Remains 6 /8 variables (removed 2) and now considering 4/6 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 4 rows 6 cols
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned [4]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 42 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 5/8 places, 4/6 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 5 /5 variables (removed 0) and now considering 4/4 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 75 ms. Remains : 5/8 places, 4/6 transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 4 transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9621469994579603014.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14230769841718255658.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9621469994579603014.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14230769841718255658.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,14,0.002479,3300,2,17,5,77,6,0,27,53,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((haveAandB<1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(haveAandB<1))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 2/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,0.003794,3616,1,0,9,151,19,3,128,129,8
FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00004vD-CTLFireability-2024-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 8/8 places, 6/6 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 8 /8 variables (removed 0) and now considering 6/6 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 6 rows 8 cols
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned [5]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 34 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 7/8 places, 6/6 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 7 /7 variables (removed 0) and now considering 6/6 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 35 ms. Remains : 7/8 places, 6/6 transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 6 transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5480606914333328831.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9761356615094465553.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5480606914333328831.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9761356615094465553.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,32,0.005531,3320,2,37,5,236,6,0,37,209,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(((AG((haveA2andB<1)) * (haveAandB<1)) * ((resB>=1)&&(haveA>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(((!(E(TRUE U !((haveA2andB<1)))) * (haveAandB<1)) * ((resB>=1)&&(haveA>=1))))))] = FALS...156
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/total) :0...161
(forward)formula 0,0,0.012957,3900,1,0,21,566,34,12,199,534,27
FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00004vD-CTLFireability-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 8/8 places, 6/6 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 8 /8 variables (removed 0) and now considering 6/6 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 22 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 26 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 51 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 5 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/8 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 6/14 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/14 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 14/14 variables, and 11 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 101 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/8 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 6/14 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/14 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 14/14 variables, and 16 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 96 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 204ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 204ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 257 ms. Remains : 8/8 places, 6/6 transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 6 transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16364050706831484501.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12853102239840461535.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16364050706831484501.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12853102239840461535.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,32,0.005405,3320,2,73,5,307,6,0,41,244,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF(((EG((haveA2andB<1)) + (haveAandB<1)) + (((resB>=1)&&(haveA>=1))||(((resB<1)||(haveA<1))&&((resA<1)||(Clients<1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(((EG((haveA2andB<1)) + (haveAandB<1)) + (((resB>=1)&&(haveA>=1))||(((resB<1)||(haveA<1))&&((...193
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/total) :0...161
(forward)formula 0,1,0.01932,3900,1,0,109,1481,39,59,237,1446,148
FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00004vD-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 8/8 places, 6/6 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 8 /8 variables (removed 0) and now considering 6/6 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 05:12:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 05:12:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 05:12:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 34 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 66 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 5 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/8 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 6/14 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/14 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 14/14 variables, and 11 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 84 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/8 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 6/14 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/14 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 14/14 variables, and 16 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 118 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 207ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 207ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 274 ms. Remains : 8/8 places, 6/6 transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 6 transitions.
[2024-05-30 05:12:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18220956157992540246.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8031422319857710286.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18220956157992540246.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8031422319857710286.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,32,0.004812,3320,2,73,5,307,6,0,41,244,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(((!(E((haveA2>=1) U EG((haveAandB>=1)))) * EX(!(E(((resA>=1)&&(Clients>=1)) U (haveA2andB>=1))))) * (AG(!(A(((haveA2>=1)||(haveAandB>=...288
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG(FwdU(EY(Init),(haveA2>=1)),(haveAandB>=1))] = FALSE * [(EY(Init) * !(EX(!(E(((resA>=1)&&(Clients>=1)) U ...526
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/total) :0...161
(forward)formula 0,0,0.017594,3900,1,0,96,1571,51,57,253,1650,138
FORMULA TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00004vD-CTLFireability-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2024-05-30 05:12:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 05:12:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
Total runtime 6706 ms.

BK_STOP 1717045956371

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00004vD"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00004vD, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r422-smll-171690574000274"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00004vD.tgz
mv TwoPhaseLocking-PT-nC00004vD execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;