fond
Model Checking Contest 2024
14th edition, Geneva, Switzerland, June 25, 2024
Execution of r422-smll-171690573800210
Last Updated
July 7, 2024

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for TriangularGrid-PT-1200

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
389.495 33089.00 47065.00 245.50 FTTFTTFFTTTFTFTT normal

Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r422-smll-171690573800210.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is TriangularGrid-PT-1200, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r422-smll-171690573800210
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 456K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.7K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 50K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.4K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 44K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 23 08:02 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K Apr 23 08:02 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.6K Apr 23 08:02 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 23 08:02 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Apr 13 04:48 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 97K Apr 13 04:48 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K Apr 13 04:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 116K Apr 13 04:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K Apr 23 08:02 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 23 08:02 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rwxr-xr-x 1 mcc users 9.7K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME TriangularGrid-PT-1200-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME TriangularGrid-PT-1200-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME TriangularGrid-PT-1200-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME TriangularGrid-PT-1200-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME TriangularGrid-PT-1200-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME TriangularGrid-PT-1200-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME TriangularGrid-PT-1200-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME TriangularGrid-PT-1200-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME TriangularGrid-PT-1200-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME TriangularGrid-PT-1200-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME TriangularGrid-PT-1200-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME TriangularGrid-PT-1200-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME TriangularGrid-PT-1200-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME TriangularGrid-PT-1200-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME TriangularGrid-PT-1200-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME TriangularGrid-PT-1200-CTLFireability-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1717019637150

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=TriangularGrid-PT-1200
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-29 21:53:59] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-29 21:53:59] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-29 21:54:00] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 73 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:00] [INFO ] Transformed 16 places.
[2024-05-29 21:54:00] [INFO ] Transformed 12 transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:00] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 16 places and 12 transitions and 48 arcs in 311 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 36 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
FORMULA TriangularGrid-PT-1200-CTLFireability-2024-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA TriangularGrid-PT-1200-CTLFireability-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 16 out of 16 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 16/16 places, 12/12 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 19 ms. Remains 16 /16 variables (removed 0) and now considering 12/12 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 12 rows 16 cols
[2024-05-29 21:54:00] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 6 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 251 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 21:54:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 21:54:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 93 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 434 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 9 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/13 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/16 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 12/28 variables, 16/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/28 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 28/28 variables, and 24 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 375 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 16/16 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/13 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/16 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 12/28 variables, 16/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 9/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/28 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 28/28 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 272 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 16/16 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 721ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 739ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1234 ms. Remains : 16/16 places, 12/12 transitions.
Support contains 16 out of 16 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 12 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 22 to 19
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1185 ms. (33 steps per ms) remains 1/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 266 ms. (149 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2024-05-29 21:54:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Problem AtomicPropp3 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 4/28 variables, and 1 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 19 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 0/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/16 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 23ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
[2024-05-29 21:54:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 12 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 16/16 places, 12/12 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 16 /16 variables (removed 0) and now considering 12/12 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 21:54:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 21:54:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 21:54:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 44 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 92 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 21:54:02] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 9 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/13 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/16 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 12/28 variables, 16/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/28 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 28/28 variables, and 24 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 161 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 16/16 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/13 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/16 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 12/28 variables, 16/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 9/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/28 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 28/28 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 153 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 16/16 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 324ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 325ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 426 ms. Remains : 16/16 places, 12/12 transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 12 transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16749830388149407480.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7929077378392881545.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16749830388149407480.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7929077378392881545.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,109552,0.420814,11824,2,702,5,43875,6,0,79,52865,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(AG(((pbl_1_1<1)||(pi1_1_1<1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((pbl_1_1<1)||(pi1_1_1<1))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.536278,11824,1,0,6,43875,15,0,556,52865,5
FORMULA TriangularGrid-PT-1200-CTLFireability-2024-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 16/16 places, 12/12 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 16 /16 variables (removed 0) and now considering 12/12 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 21:54:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned [3]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 45 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 15/16 places, 12/12 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 15 /15 variables (removed 0) and now considering 12/12 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 45 ms. Remains : 15/16 places, 12/12 transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 12 transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8551443519850564190.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9694684004830715314.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8551443519850564190.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9694684004830715314.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,109552,0.198257,7924,2,338,5,24930,6,0,75,27360,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AG(EF(EX(((pil3_1_1>=1)&&(po3_1_1>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U EX(((pil3_1_1>=1)&&(po3_1_1>=1))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.240241,8188,1,0,8,24930,14,1,530,27360,7
FORMULA TriangularGrid-PT-1200-CTLFireability-2024-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 16/16 places, 12/12 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 16 /16 variables (removed 0) and now considering 12/12 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 21:54:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 21:54:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 21:54:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 57 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 94 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 9 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/13 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/16 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 12/28 variables, 16/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/28 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 28/28 variables, and 24 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 172 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 16/16 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/13 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/16 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 12/28 variables, 16/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 9/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/28 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 28/28 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 212 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 16/16 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 408ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 409ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 504 ms. Remains : 16/16 places, 12/12 transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 12 transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9660093978048291167.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14037234595333995220.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9660093978048291167.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14037234595333995220.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,109552,0.497254,11636,2,702,5,43875,6,0,79,52865,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((pil2_1_1>=1)&&(po2_1_1>=1)) U AX(!(EF(AG(!(((pbl_1_1<1)||(pi1_1_1<1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,((pil2_1_1>=1)&&(po2_1_1>=1))) * !(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(!(((pbl_1_1<1)||(pi1_1_1<1))))))))))...167
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 8/3/4
(forward)formula 0,1,0.586819,11900,1,0,7,43875,21,1,572,52865,8
FORMULA TriangularGrid-PT-1200-CTLFireability-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 16/16 places, 12/12 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 16 /16 variables (removed 0) and now considering 12/12 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 21:54:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 21:54:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 21:54:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 35 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 64 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 9 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/13 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/16 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 12/28 variables, 16/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/28 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 28/28 variables, and 24 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 181 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 16/16 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/13 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/16 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 12/28 variables, 16/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 9/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/28 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 28/28 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 233 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 16/16 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 423ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 424ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 488 ms. Remains : 16/16 places, 12/12 transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 12 transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17261168614401818941.gal : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2457413655594176366.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17261168614401818941.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2457413655594176366.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,109552,0.641007,11636,2,702,5,43875,6,0,79,52865,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((E(A(((pbl_1_1>=1)&&(pi2_1_1>=1)) U EF(!(((pbl_1_1<1)||(pi1_1_1<1))))) U EF(((AX(!(((pbl_1_1>=1)&&(pi2_1_1>=1)))) * EX(((pil1_1_1>=1)&&(...648
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(((Init * !(!((E(!(!((E(!(!(((pbl_1_1<1)||(pi1_1_1<1)))) U (!((((((pb1_1_1>=1)&&(pol1_1_1>=1))&&((pbl_1...1655
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 2/0/10
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,3.51889,67004,1,0,33,283476,51,18,669,383835,36
FORMULA TriangularGrid-PT-1200-CTLFireability-2024-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 16/16 places, 12/12 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 16 /16 variables (removed 0) and now considering 12/12 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 21:54:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 21:54:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 21:54:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 44 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 74 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 9 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/13 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/16 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 12/28 variables, 16/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/28 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 28/28 variables, and 24 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 207 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 16/16 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/13 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/16 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 12/28 variables, 16/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 9/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/28 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 28/28 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 202 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 16/16 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 417ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 417ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 493 ms. Remains : 16/16 places, 12/12 transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 12 transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9504593551427319988.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10710098094009935544.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9504593551427319988.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10710098094009935544.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,109552,0.584525,11636,2,702,5,43875,6,0,79,52865,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EX(AG((((!(A(((pbl_1_1>=1)&&(pi2_1_1>=1)) U ((pil1_1_1>=1)&&(po1_1_1>=1)))) + (pbl_1_1<1)) + ((pi1_1_1<1)||(pb1_1_1<1))) + (pol1_1_1<1...160
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,EX(!(E(TRUE U !((((!(!((E(!(((pil1_1_1>=1)&&(po1_1_1>=1))) U (!(((pbl_1_1>=1)&&(pi2_1_1>=1))) * !(((p...302
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 8/0/4
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/4
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/4
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/4
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/4
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/4
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/4
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/4
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 0/0/4
(forward)formula 0,1,1.01149,14804,1,0,11,55783,32,5,618,69828,15
FORMULA TriangularGrid-PT-1200-CTLFireability-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 16/16 places, 12/12 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 16 /16 variables (removed 0) and now considering 12/12 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 21:54:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 21:54:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 21:54:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 85 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 21:54:10] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 9 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/13 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/16 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 12/28 variables, 16/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/28 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 28/28 variables, and 24 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 188 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 16/16 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/13 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/16 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 12/28 variables, 16/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 9/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/28 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 28/28 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 203 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 16/16 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 401ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 402ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 496 ms. Remains : 16/16 places, 12/12 transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 12 transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5536972569324701138.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4718051324773378202.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5536972569324701138.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4718051324773378202.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,109552,0.596617,11636,2,702,5,43875,6,0,79,52865,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EF(((pbl_1_1>=1)&&(pi1_1_1>=1))) + ((AG(((pil1_1_1>=1)&&(po1_1_1>=1))) * (pb2_1_1>=1)) * (pol2_1_1>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((pbl_1_1>=1)&&(pi1_1_1>=1))))),TRUE) * !(((pil1_1_1>=1)&&(po1_1_1>=1))))...355
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.703898,11900,1,0,15,43875,20,3,559,52865,8
FORMULA TriangularGrid-PT-1200-CTLFireability-2024-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 16/16 places, 12/12 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 16 /16 variables (removed 0) and now considering 12/12 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 21:54:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 21:54:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 21:54:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 33 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 62 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 9 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/13 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/16 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 12/28 variables, 16/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/28 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 28/28 variables, and 24 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 128 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 16/16 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/13 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/16 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 12/28 variables, 16/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 9/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/28 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 28/28 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 151 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 16/16 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 285ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 285ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 348 ms. Remains : 16/16 places, 12/12 transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 12 transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6061152884691702584.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6650636372508820581.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6061152884691702584.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6650636372508820581.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,109552,0.629196,11636,2,702,5,43875,6,0,79,52865,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E((((AF(EG(((pbl_1_1>=1)&&(pi2_1_1>=1)))) + (!((((pb2_1_1>=1)&&(pol2_1_1>=1))&&((pbl_1_1>=1)&&(pi1_1_1>=1)))) * !(A(((pbl_1_1>=1)&&(pi3...508
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(((!(EG(!(EG(((pbl_1_1>=1)&&(pi2_1_1>=1)))))) + (!((((pb2_1_1>=1)&&(pol2_1_1>=1))&&((pbl_1_1>=1)&&(p...649
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 8/0/4
(forward)formula 0,0,7.43034,127380,1,0,270,577948,47,259,630,768493,392
FORMULA TriangularGrid-PT-1200-CTLFireability-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 16/16 places, 12/12 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 16 /16 variables (removed 0) and now considering 12/12 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 21:54:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 21:54:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 21:54:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 41 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 74 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 21:54:19] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 9 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/13 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/16 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 12/28 variables, 16/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/28 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 28/28 variables, and 24 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 125 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 16/16 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/13 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/16 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 12/28 variables, 16/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 9/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/28 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 28/28 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 154 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 16/16 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 291ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 291ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 371 ms. Remains : 16/16 places, 12/12 transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 12 transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2443256904614407709.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1693232997960013703.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2443256904614407709.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1693232997960013703.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,109552,0.577246,11636,2,702,5,43875,6,0,79,52865,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(AG(((pbl_1_1>=1)&&(pi3_1_1>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((pbl_1_1>=1)&&(pi3_1_1>=1))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.66141,11900,1,0,6,43875,15,0,556,52865,5
FORMULA TriangularGrid-PT-1200-CTLFireability-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 16/16 places, 12/12 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 16 /16 variables (removed 0) and now considering 12/12 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 21:54:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned [3]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 32 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 15/16 places, 12/12 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 15 transition count 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 13 transition count 11
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 13 transition count 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 11 transition count 10
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 11 transition count 9
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 9 transition count 8
Applied a total of 10 rules in 24 ms. Remains 9 /15 variables (removed 6) and now considering 8/12 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 8 rows 9 cols
[2024-05-29 21:54:20] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 22 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 21:54:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 21:54:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 26 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 50 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 9/16 places, 8/12 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 107 ms. Remains : 9/16 places, 8/12 transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 8 transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13631901668901948584.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16760626985573375261.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13631901668901948584.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16760626985573375261.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,14402,0.093333,5232,2,145,5,8572,6,0,47,9912,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((AG(EF(((pil1_1_1<1)||(po1_1_1<1)))) + (pb3_1_1<1)) + (pol3_1_1<1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U ((pil1_1_1<1)||(po1_1_1<1)))))) + (pb3_1_1<1)) + (pol3_1_1<1)))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.183161,5496,1,0,8,9658,20,3,403,10998,12
FORMULA TriangularGrid-PT-1200-CTLFireability-2024-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 16/16 places, 12/12 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 16 /16 variables (removed 0) and now considering 12/12 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 12 rows 16 cols
[2024-05-29 21:54:20] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 21:54:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 21:54:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 34 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 65 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 9 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/13 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/16 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 12/28 variables, 16/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/28 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 28/28 variables, and 24 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 180 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 16/16 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/13 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/16 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 12/28 variables, 16/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 9/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/28 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 28/28 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 200 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 16/16 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 394ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 395ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 460 ms. Remains : 16/16 places, 12/12 transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 12 transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15245338447002188252.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5794771627307512659.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15245338447002188252.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5794771627307512659.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,109552,0.485576,11636,2,702,5,43875,6,0,79,52865,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((EX(EX(((pbl_1_1>=1)&&(pi1_1_1>=1)))) * ((AG(((pb2_1_1>=1)&&(pol2_1_1>=1))) + AF(((pb3_1_1<1)||(pol3_1_1<1)))) + (((pbl_1_1>=1)&&(p...202
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (EX(EX(((pbl_1_1>=1)&&(pi1_1_1>=1)))) * ((!(E(TRUE U !(((pb2_1_1>=1)&&(pol2_1_1>=...280
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.694811,11900,1,0,15,43875,27,3,594,52865,15
FORMULA TriangularGrid-PT-1200-CTLFireability-2024-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 16/16 places, 12/12 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 16 /16 variables (removed 0) and now considering 12/12 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 21:54:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 21:54:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 21:54:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 32 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 62 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 9 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/13 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/16 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 12/28 variables, 16/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/28 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 28/28 variables, and 24 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 150 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 16/16 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/13 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/16 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 12/28 variables, 16/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 9/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/28 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 28/28 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 155 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 16/16 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 310ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 310ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 373 ms. Remains : 16/16 places, 12/12 transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 12 transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5381243926268316755.gal : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17409393407574267747.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5381243926268316755.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17409393407574267747.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,109552,0.587221,11640,2,702,5,43875,6,0,79,52865,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EX(((pbl_1_1>=1)&&(pi1_1_1>=1))) + EG(AG((AF(((pb3_1_1<1)||(pol3_1_1<1))) * EG(((pb2_1_1>=1)&&(pol2_1_1>=1))))))) + (!(A(AX((((EX(((pil...444
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(((Init * !((EX(((pbl_1_1>=1)&&(pi1_1_1>=1))) + EG(!(E(TRUE U !((!(EG(!(((pb3_1_1<1)||(pol3_1_1<1))))) * ...1131
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,2.76619,49124,1,0,29,212933,50,14,616,242101,27
FORMULA TriangularGrid-PT-1200-CTLFireability-2024-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 16/16 places, 12/12 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 16 /16 variables (removed 0) and now considering 12/12 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 21:54:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 21:54:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 21:54:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 32 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 62 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 21:54:25] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 9 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/13 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/16 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 12/28 variables, 16/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/28 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 28/28 variables, and 24 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 118 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 16/16 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/13 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/16 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 12/28 variables, 16/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 9/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/28 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 28/28 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 179 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 16/16 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 304ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 305ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 373 ms. Remains : 16/16 places, 12/12 transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 12 transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17350972122560581970.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7026937782928129950.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17350972122560581970.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7026937782928129950.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,109552,0.636373,11636,2,702,5,43875,6,0,79,52865,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EG(((pbl_1_1>=1)&&(pi3_1_1>=1))) + !(A(((pbl_1_1>=1)&&(pi2_1_1>=1)) U (!(E(((pb2_1_1>=1)&&(pol2_1_1>=1)) U !(((pbl_1_1<1)||(pi1_1_1<1))...410
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG(Init,((pbl_1_1>=1)&&(pi3_1_1>=1)))] != FALSE + ([(FwdU(((FwdU(Init,!((!(E(((pb2_1_1>=1)&&(pol2_1_1>=1)) ...919
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 8/3/4
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 8/3/4
(forward)formula 0,1,2.19885,39980,1,0,264,182935,39,252,635,270549,379
FORMULA TriangularGrid-PT-1200-CTLFireability-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 16/16 places, 12/12 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 16 /16 variables (removed 0) and now considering 12/12 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 21:54:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 25 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 21:54:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 21:54:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 39 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 66 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 9 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/13 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/16 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 12/28 variables, 16/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/28 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 28/28 variables, and 24 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 163 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 16/16 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/13 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/16 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 12/28 variables, 16/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 9/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/28 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 28/28 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 201 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 16/16 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 370ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 371ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 438 ms. Remains : 16/16 places, 12/12 transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 12 transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4677611368328293305.gal : 8 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8149180093533281458.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4677611368328293305.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8149180093533281458.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,109552,0.632311,11636,2,702,5,43875,6,0,79,52865,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((((pbl_1_1>=1)&&(pi1_1_1>=1)) + ((E(!(EG(((pbl_1_1>=1)&&(pi3_1_1>=1)))) U E(!(((pil1_1_1>=1)&&(po1_1_1>=1))) U AX(((pbl_1_1>=1)&&(pi2_...200
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * ((pbl_1_1>=1)&&(pi1_1_1>=1)))] != FALSE + [(FwdU(FwdU(((EY(Init) * (pi1_1_1>=1)) * (pbl_1_1>=1)),!...277
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.763098,11900,1,0,16,43875,34,3,581,52865,13
FORMULA TriangularGrid-PT-1200-CTLFireability-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 16/16 places, 12/12 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 16 /16 variables (removed 0) and now considering 12/12 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 21:54:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 21:54:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 21:54:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 31 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 66 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 9 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/13 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/16 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 12/28 variables, 16/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/28 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 28/28 variables, and 24 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 119 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 16/16 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/13 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/16 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 12/28 variables, 16/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 9/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/28 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 28/28 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 139 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 16/16 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 264ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 265ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 332 ms. Remains : 16/16 places, 12/12 transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 12 transitions.
[2024-05-29 21:54:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16402617255603400322.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7865632068171257804.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16402617255603400322.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7865632068171257804.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,109552,0.488609,11636,2,702,5,43875,6,0,79,52865,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EX(EX(EG(((pil1_1_1<1)||(po1_1_1<1))))) + A(A(AF(((pbl_1_1>=1)&&(pi2_1_1>=1))) U EF(((pil3_1_1>=1)&&(po3_1_1>=1)))) U ((pb1_1_1>=1)&&...172
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!((E(!(((pb1_1_1>=1)&&(pol1_1_1>=1))) U (!(!((E(!(E(TRUE U ((pil3_1_1>=1)&&(po3_1_1>=1)))...435
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.63446,11900,1,0,8,43875,18,0,572,52865,8
FORMULA TriangularGrid-PT-1200-CTLFireability-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2024-05-29 21:54:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 21:54:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
Total runtime 30510 ms.

BK_STOP 1717019670239

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="TriangularGrid-PT-1200"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is TriangularGrid-PT-1200, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r422-smll-171690573800210"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/TriangularGrid-PT-1200.tgz
mv TriangularGrid-PT-1200 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;