Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r422-smll-171690573500044.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is TCPcondis-PT-30, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r422-smll-171690573500044
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 472K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.7K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 52K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.0K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 59K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 23 08:02 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K Apr 23 08:02 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Apr 23 08:02 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 23 08:02 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K Apr 12 02:59 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 115K Apr 12 02:59 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.7K Apr 12 02:59 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 86K Apr 12 02:59 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 23 08:02 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 23 08:02 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rwxr-xr-x 1 mcc users 24K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716962305866

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=TCPcondis-PT-30
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-29 05:58:28] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-29 05:58:28] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-29 05:58:28] [WARNING] Skipping unknown tool specific annotation : Tina
[2024-05-29 05:58:28] [WARNING] Unknown XML tag in source file: size
[2024-05-29 05:58:28] [WARNING] Unknown XML tag in source file: color
[2024-05-29 05:58:28] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 94 ms
[2024-05-29 05:58:28] [INFO ] Transformed 30 places.
[2024-05-29 05:58:28] [INFO ] Transformed 32 transitions.
[2024-05-29 05:58:28] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 30 places and 32 transitions and 108 arcs in 403 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 27 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 25 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 15 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2024-05-29 05:58:29] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 12 ms
[2024-05-29 05:58:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 313 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 05:58:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 05:58:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 91 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 449 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 05:58:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 884 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 755 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1695ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1713ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2204 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Support contains 25 out of 30 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-29 05:58:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2024-05-29 05:58:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-29 05:58:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 25 to 24
RANDOM walk for 40050 steps (8 resets) in 489 ms. (81 steps per ms) remains 0/24 properties
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)&&F(p1))))'
Support contains 3 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 27 transition count 29
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 26 transition count 28
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 26 transition count 28
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 26 transition count 27
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 26 transition count 26
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 25 transition count 26
Applied a total of 11 rules in 50 ms. Remains 25 /30 variables (removed 5) and now considering 26/32 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 26 rows 25 cols
[2024-05-29 05:58:32] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-29 05:58:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 05:58:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 05:58:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 137 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 05:58:32] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 23 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 05:58:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/25 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 26/51 variables, 25/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 51/51 variables, and 34 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 475 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/25 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 26/51 variables, 25/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 23/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 51/51 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 495 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 993ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 994ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 25/30 places, 26/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1191 ms. Remains : 25/30 places, 26/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 502 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-00
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 10650 reset in 451 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 20016 steps with 2151 reset with depth 16 and stack size 16 in 87 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-00 finished in 2337 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F(((p1&&X(G((p1||X(G(p2))))))||p0))))'
Support contains 7 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2024-05-29 05:58:34] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-29 05:58:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 05:58:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 05:58:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 115 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 05:58:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 553 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 514 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1089ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1090ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1209 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 246 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-02
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 72 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 84 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 (NOT p1) p2), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X p0), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 19 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 13 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-02 finished in 1664 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(p0)&&(G(p1)||X(G(p2)))))'
Support contains 5 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 05:58:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 05:58:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 05:58:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 05:58:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 58 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 98 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 05:58:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 643 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 509 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1167ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1168ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1267 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 224 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (NOT p0), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), true, (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-03
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 57 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-03 finished in 1510 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((p0||X(G((p0&&X(p0)))))))'
Support contains 1 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 05:58:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 05:58:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 05:58:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 05:58:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 50 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 98 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 05:58:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 592 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 610 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1213ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1214ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1313 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 149 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-04
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 55 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 71 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 20 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 5 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-04 finished in 1630 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(p0)||G(p1)))'
Support contains 3 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 28 transition count 30
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 27 transition count 29
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 27 transition count 29
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 27 transition count 27
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 27 transition count 25
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 25 transition count 25
Applied a total of 12 rules in 8 ms. Remains 25 /30 variables (removed 5) and now considering 25/32 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 25 rows 25 cols
[2024-05-29 05:58:39] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 05:58:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 05:58:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 05:58:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 119 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 05:58:39] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 23 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 05:58:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 25/50 variables, 25/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/50 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 50/50 variables, and 34 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 263 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 25/50 variables, 25/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 23/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/50 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 50/50 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 332 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 610ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 611ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 25/30 places, 25/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 748 ms. Remains : 25/30 places, 25/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 150 ms :[true, (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-05
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 31 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-05 finished in 918 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 26 transition count 28
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 24 transition count 26
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 24 transition count 26
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 24 transition count 24
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 24 transition count 22
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 22 transition count 22
Applied a total of 18 rules in 11 ms. Remains 22 /30 variables (removed 8) and now considering 22/32 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 22 rows 22 cols
[2024-05-29 05:58:40] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 05:58:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 05:58:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 05:58:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 60 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 124 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 05:58:40] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 20 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 05:58:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 22/44 variables, 22/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/44 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 44/44 variables, and 31 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved in 214 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 22/44 variables, 22/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 20/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/44 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 44/44 variables, and 51 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved in 257 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 22/22 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 481ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 483ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 22/30 places, 22/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 626 ms. Remains : 22/30 places, 22/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 82 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-06
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2457 reset in 172 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 824 steps with 26 reset with depth 47 and stack size 47 in 2 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-06 finished in 900 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((p0 U G(!p1)))'
Support contains 5 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 27 transition count 29
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 26 transition count 28
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 26 transition count 28
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 26 transition count 26
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 26 transition count 24
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 24 transition count 24
Applied a total of 14 rules in 11 ms. Remains 24 /30 variables (removed 6) and now considering 24/32 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 24 rows 24 cols
[2024-05-29 05:58:41] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-29 05:58:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 05:58:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 05:58:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 63 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 123 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 05:58:41] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 22 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 05:58:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 24/48 variables, 24/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/48 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 48/48 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved in 350 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 24/48 variables, 24/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 22/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/48 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 48/48 variables, and 55 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved in 377 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 738ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 739ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 24/30 places, 24/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 883 ms. Remains : 24/30 places, 24/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 93 ms :[p1, true, p1]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-07
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 9 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-07 finished in 991 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((p0||G(p1)) U X(p2)))'
Support contains 6 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2024-05-29 05:58:42] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 05:58:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 05:58:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 05:58:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 103 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 05:58:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 732 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 670 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1412ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1414ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1519 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 261 ms :[(NOT p2), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p2), true, (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-08
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-08 finished in 1800 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F((G(p1)||p0))))'
Support contains 4 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 27 transition count 29
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 25 transition count 27
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 25 transition count 27
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 25 transition count 25
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 25 transition count 23
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 23 transition count 23
Applied a total of 16 rules in 6 ms. Remains 23 /30 variables (removed 7) and now considering 23/32 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 23 rows 23 cols
[2024-05-29 05:58:44] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 05:58:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 05:58:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 05:58:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 40 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 85 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 05:58:44] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 21 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 05:58:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 23/46 variables, 23/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/46 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 46/46 variables, and 32 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 216 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 23/46 variables, 23/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 21/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/46 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 46/46 variables, and 53 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 303 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 526ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 527ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 23/30 places, 23/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 623 ms. Remains : 23/30 places, 23/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 176 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-09
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1228 reset in 242 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1239 reset in 299 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X p0), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0))))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 153 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 79 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 15453 steps (2 resets) in 33 ms. (454 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X p0), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0))))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1))), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 231 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 96 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 91 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Support contains 4 out of 23 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 23/23 places, 23/23 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 23 /23 variables (removed 0) and now considering 23/23 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 05:58:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 05:58:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 05:58:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 05:58:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 42 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 86 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 05:58:46] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 21 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 05:58:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 23/46 variables, 23/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/46 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 46/46 variables, and 32 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 275 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 23/46 variables, 23/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 21/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/46 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 46/46 variables, and 53 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 266 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 550ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 550ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 646 ms. Remains : 23/23 places, 23/23 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 127 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 81 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 25670 steps (5 resets) in 36 ms. (693 steps per ms) remains 0/4 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1))), (F (NOT p0)), (F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 302 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 98 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 76 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 88 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1272 reset in 278 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1236 reset in 216 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin9924190623864646848
[2024-05-29 05:58:48] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 23 transitions.
[2024-05-29 05:58:48] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 2 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-29 05:58:48] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 23 transitions.
[2024-05-29 05:58:48] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-29 05:58:48] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 23 transitions.
[2024-05-29 05:58:48] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2024-05-29 05:58:48] [INFO ] Built C files in 30ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin9924190623864646848
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin9924190623864646848;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 478 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin9924190623864646848;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 57 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin9924190623864646848;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased12232154217507189099.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 221 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES PARTIAL_ORDER EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-09 finished in 4864 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F(!p0)))'
Support contains 1 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2024-05-29 05:58:49] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-29 05:58:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 05:58:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 05:58:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 59 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 105 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 05:58:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 565 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 634 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1211ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1212ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1318 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 79 ms :[p0, p0]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-10
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1523 reset in 492 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1554 reset in 313 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 83 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 84 ms :[p0, p0]
RANDOM walk for 2639 steps (0 resets) in 5 ms. (439 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 102 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 74 ms :[p0, p0]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 72 ms :[p0, p0]
[2024-05-29 05:58:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 05:58:51] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-05-29 05:58:51] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2024-05-29 05:58:51] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 25 ms returned sat
[2024-05-29 05:58:51] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-05-29 05:58:51] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-05-29 05:58:51] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2024-05-29 05:58:51] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 15 ms returned sat
[2024-05-29 05:58:51] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 28/100/28 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 3 ms.
[2024-05-29 05:58:51] [INFO ] Added : 19 causal constraints over 5 iterations in 68 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG p0
Support contains 1 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 27 transition count 29
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 26 transition count 28
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 26 transition count 28
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 26 transition count 26
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 26 transition count 24
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 24 transition count 24
Applied a total of 14 rules in 13 ms. Remains 24 /30 variables (removed 6) and now considering 24/32 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 24 rows 24 cols
[2024-05-29 05:58:51] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 05:58:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 05:58:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 05:58:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 82 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 135 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 05:58:52] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 22 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 05:58:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 5/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 24/48 variables, 24/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/48 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 48/48 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved in 369 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 5/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 24/48 variables, 24/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 22/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/48 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 48/48 variables, and 55 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved in 397 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 784ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 786ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 24/30 places, 24/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 941 ms. Remains : 24/30 places, 24/32 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 112 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 92 ms :[p0, p0]
RANDOM walk for 1430 steps (0 resets) in 7 ms. (178 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [p0, (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 145 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 99 ms :[p0, p0]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 98 ms :[p0, p0]
[2024-05-29 05:58:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 05:58:53] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 4 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-05-29 05:58:53] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 4 positive and 5 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2024-05-29 05:58:53] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 34 ms returned sat
[2024-05-29 05:58:53] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-05-29 05:58:53] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 4 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-05-29 05:58:53] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 4 positive and 5 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2024-05-29 05:58:53] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 18 ms returned sat
[2024-05-29 05:58:53] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 22/79/22 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 3 ms.
[2024-05-29 05:58:53] [INFO ] Added : 20 causal constraints over 5 iterations in 44 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG p0
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 120 ms :[p0, p0]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2221 reset in 288 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 2060 steps with 47 reset with depth 14 and stack size 14 in 6 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-10 finished in 5105 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(G(p0))&&F(p1))))'
Support contains 4 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 28 transition count 30
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 27 transition count 29
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 27 transition count 29
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 27 transition count 27
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 27 transition count 25
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 25 transition count 25
Applied a total of 12 rules in 8 ms. Remains 25 /30 variables (removed 5) and now considering 25/32 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 25 rows 25 cols
[2024-05-29 05:58:54] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-29 05:58:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 05:58:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 05:58:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 69 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 171 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 05:58:54] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 23 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 05:58:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 25/50 variables, 25/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/50 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 50/50 variables, and 34 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 536 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 25/50 variables, 25/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 23/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/50 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 50/50 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 336 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 885ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 886ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 25/30 places, 25/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1073 ms. Remains : 25/30 places, 25/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 148 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-11
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3 reset in 359 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 6338 steps with 1 reset with depth 6263 and stack size 6263 in 29 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-11 finished in 1647 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X((p0||(X(G(p1))&&(p2||X(p2)))))))'
Support contains 5 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2024-05-29 05:58:55] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-29 05:58:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 05:58:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 05:58:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 143 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 209 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 05:58:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 683 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 769 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1469ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1472ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1683 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 327 ms :[true, (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2))), (NOT p1), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-12
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 6 steps with 1 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-12 finished in 2033 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F(((p1 U p2)&&p0))))'
Support contains 4 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 05:58:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 05:58:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 05:58:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 05:58:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 155 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 05:58:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 786 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 688 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1526ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1540ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1697 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 184 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p2), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-13
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2095 reset in 291 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2101 reset in 289 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1))), (X (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))))]
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 11 factoid took 300 ms. Reduced automaton from 3 states, 5 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 6 states, 14 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 320 ms :[(OR (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p2), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), false, (AND p1 (NOT p2) p0), false]
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 9 to 7
RANDOM walk for 40045 steps (8 resets) in 54 ms. (728 steps per ms) remains 1/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 399 ms. (100 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2024-05-29 05:59:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Problem apf6 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 4/62 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 45 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 0/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 65ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Found 1 invariant AP formulas.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1))), (X (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (G (OR p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) p2))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p0)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (F p2), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (NOT p0)))), (F p1), (F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 12 factoid took 617 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 14 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 5 states, 11 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 271 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p2), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND p1 (NOT p2) p0), false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 255 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)), (NOT p2), (OR (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (AND p1 (NOT p2) p0), false]
[2024-05-29 05:59:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 05:59:02] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-05-29 05:59:02] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2024-05-29 05:59:02] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 24 ms returned sat
[2024-05-29 05:59:02] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-05-29 05:59:02] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2024-05-29 05:59:02] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2024-05-29 05:59:02] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 21 ms returned sat
[2024-05-29 05:59:02] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 28/100/28 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 4 ms.
[2024-05-29 05:59:02] [INFO ] Added : 17 causal constraints over 4 iterations in 44 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p1)
[2024-05-29 05:59:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Proved EG (NOT p2)
[2024-05-29 05:59:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 05:59:02] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-05-29 05:59:02] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2024-05-29 05:59:02] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 23 ms returned sat
[2024-05-29 05:59:02] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
[2024-05-29 05:59:02] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2024-05-29 05:59:02] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2024-05-29 05:59:02] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 22 ms returned sat
[2024-05-29 05:59:02] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 28/100/28 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 4 ms.
[2024-05-29 05:59:02] [INFO ] Added : 17 causal constraints over 4 iterations in 50 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1))), (X (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p1)))), (X (X (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (G (OR p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1))))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) p2))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p0)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (F p2), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (NOT p0)))), (F p1), (F p0), (G (NOT p2))]
Property proved to be false thanks to negative knowledge :(G (NOT p2))
Knowledge based reduction with 12 factoid took 900 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 11 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-13 finished in 5859 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F((!p0 U (p1||G(!p0)))))'
Support contains 2 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 27 transition count 29
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 26 transition count 28
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 26 transition count 28
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 26 transition count 27
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 26 transition count 26
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 25 transition count 26
Applied a total of 11 rules in 5 ms. Remains 25 /30 variables (removed 5) and now considering 26/32 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 26 rows 25 cols
[2024-05-29 05:59:03] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 05:59:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 05:59:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 05:59:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 93 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 05:59:03] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 23 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 05:59:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/25 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 26/51 variables, 25/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 51/51 variables, and 34 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 425 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/25 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 26/51 variables, 25/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 23/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/51 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 51/51 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 472 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 905ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 905ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 25/30 places, 26/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1009 ms. Remains : 25/30 places, 26/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 176 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-14
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 219 reset in 378 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 10486 steps with 21 reset with depth 127 and stack size 127 in 44 ms.
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-14 finished in 1623 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X((F(X(p0)) U p1))))'
Support contains 4 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2024-05-29 05:59:05] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 05:59:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 05:59:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 05:59:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 121 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 05:59:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 745 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 453 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1219ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1220ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1342 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 244 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p0), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-15
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1599 reset in 180 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1646 reset in 192 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 100 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 220 ms :[(NOT p0), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
RANDOM walk for 40049 steps (8 resets) in 39 ms. (1001 steps per ms) remains 1/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 116 ms. (341 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2024-05-29 05:59:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Problem apf1 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 4/62 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 29 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 0/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 33ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Found 1 invariant AP formulas.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (G (OR p0 (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0), (F p1)]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 205 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 183 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 188 ms :[(NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
[2024-05-29 05:59:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Proved EG (NOT p1)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p1))), (G (OR p0 (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0), (F p1), (G (NOT p1))]
Property proved to be false thanks to negative knowledge :(G (NOT p1))
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 209 ms. Reduced automaton from 4 states, 4 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property TCPcondis-PT-30-LTLFireability-15 finished in 3271 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 40271 ms.

BK_STOP 1716962348610

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="TCPcondis-PT-30"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is TCPcondis-PT-30, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r422-smll-171690573500044"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/TCPcondis-PT-30.tgz
mv TCPcondis-PT-30 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property LTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;