Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r422-smll-171690573400002.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.........................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is TCPcondis-PT-05, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r422-smll-171690573400002
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 500K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 116K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.3K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 47K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 23 08:02 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K Apr 23 08:02 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K Apr 23 08:02 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 23 08:02 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K Apr 12 03:04 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 120K Apr 12 03:04 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.1K Apr 12 03:03 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 58K Apr 12 03:03 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 23 08:02 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 23 08:02 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rwxr-xr-x 1 mcc users 24K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716932578321

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=TCPcondis-PT-05
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-28 21:43:01] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-28 21:43:01] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-28 21:43:01] [WARNING] Skipping unknown tool specific annotation : Tina
[2024-05-28 21:43:01] [WARNING] Unknown XML tag in source file: size
[2024-05-28 21:43:01] [WARNING] Unknown XML tag in source file: color
[2024-05-28 21:43:01] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 102 ms
[2024-05-28 21:43:01] [INFO ] Transformed 30 places.
[2024-05-28 21:43:01] [INFO ] Transformed 32 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:43:01] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 30 places and 32 transitions and 108 arcs in 347 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 40 ms.
Support contains 30 out of 30 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 21 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2024-05-28 21:43:01] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 19 ms
[2024-05-28 21:43:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 273 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 21:43:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:43:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 99 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 439 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:43:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 1125 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 946 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2146ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2162ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2676 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Support contains 30 out of 30 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-28 21:43:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2024-05-28 21:43:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2024-05-28 21:43:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
Support contains 29 out of 30 places (down from 30) after GAL structural reductions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 44 to 43
RANDOM walk for 26584 steps (6 resets) in 1062 ms. (25 steps per ms) remains 0/43 properties
[2024-05-28 21:43:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-28 21:43:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-28 21:43:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:43:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:43:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 75 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 21:43:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:43:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 86 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 168 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:43:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 551 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 602 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1183ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1185ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1357 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:43:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-28 21:43:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-28 21:43:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:43:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 21:43:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 21:43:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7736677944846800945.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 21:43:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17496692911421766358.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7736677944846800945.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17496692911421766358.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.98583e+06,0.880932,20696,2,7663,5,103918,6,0,155,96180,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((!(E(EF(AX((LISTEN>=1))) U ((AG((CLOSEWAIT>=1)) + (((CLOSEWAIT>=1)&&(SYN>=1))&&((SYNACK>=1)&&(xSYNSENT>=1)))) + ((LASTACK>=1)&&(xFINAC...218
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(E(E(TRUE U !(EX(!((LISTEN>=1))))) U ((!(E(TRUE U !((CLOSEWAIT>=1)))) + (((CLOSEWAIT>=1)&&(SYN>=1))...291
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t24, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...168
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,15.3382,317872,1,0,203,1.75334e+06,107,161,1198,1.93269e+06,228
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:43:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:43:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 21:43:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:43:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 59 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 109 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:43:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 717 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 692 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1425ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1427ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1539 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:43:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 21:43:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 21:43:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:43:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 21:43:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 21:43:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5802410506650960610.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 21:43:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9192300523222757843.ctl : 10 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5802410506650960610.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9192300523222757843.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.98583e+06,0.852711,20740,2,7663,5,103918,6,0,155,96180,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EG((AF(((SYN<1)||(xSYNSENT<1))) + EX(AF(((FINWAIT2>=1)&&(xFIN>=1)))))) * (AX((((LISTEN<1)||(TIMEWAIT<1))||((SYNACK<1)||(xSYNRCVD<1)))...203
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((EG((!(EG(!(((SYN<1)||(xSYNSENT<1))))) + EX(!(EG(!(((FINWAIT2>=1)&&(xFIN>=1)))))))) * (!(EX(!((((LI...278
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t24, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...168
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-28 21:43:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 21:43:54] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-28 21:43:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13386072153276774634.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13386072153276774634.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13386072153276774634.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13386072153276774634.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13386072153276774634.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-28 21:43:54] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-28 21:43:54] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-28 21:43:54] [INFO ] Removed a total of 24 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:43:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 156 ms
[2024-05-28 21:43:54] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2024-05-28 21:43:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11559540603690767024.gal : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 21:43:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17587187481260438768.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11559540603690767024.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17587187481260438768.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.98583e+06,1.35533,34416,2884,277,56569,2976,148,161130,39,50106,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EG((AF(((u0.SYN<1)||(u9.xSYNSENT<1))) + EX(AF(((i1.i1.u3.FINWAIT2>=1)&&(i2.i1.u5.xFIN>=1)))))) * (AX((((u0.LISTEN<1)||(u0.TIMEWAIT<1)...266
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((EG((!(EG(!(((u0.SYN<1)||(u9.xSYNSENT<1))))) + EX(!(EG(!(((i1.i1.u3.FINWAIT2>=1)&&(i2.i1.u5.xFIN>=1...341
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t24, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...168
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 29 transition count 31
Applied a total of 2 rules in 21 ms. Remains 29 /30 variables (removed 1) and now considering 31/32 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 31 rows 29 cols
[2024-05-28 21:44:24] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-28 21:44:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 21:44:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:44:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 104 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-28 21:44:24] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 27 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:44:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/28 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 31/60 variables, 29/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/60 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 60/60 variables, and 38 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved in 693 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 29/29 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/28 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 31/60 variables, 29/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 27/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/60 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 60/60 variables, and 65 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved in 681 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 29/29 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1389ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1390ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 29/30 places, 31/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1522 ms. Remains : 29/30 places, 31/32 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:44:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 21:44:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 21:44:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 31 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:44:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 21:44:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 21:44:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11256650704683555608.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 21:44:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2038794788149044369.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11256650704683555608.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2038794788149044369.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.25558e+06,0.708037,16812,2,5908,5,78379,6,0,150,74443,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((CLOSED>=1) * (EG(((((xTIMEWAIT<1)||(SYN<1))||((SYNACK<1)||(xSYNSENT<1)))||((FIN<1)||(xFINWAIT2<1)))) + ((SYN>=1)&&(xLISTEN>=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((CLOSED>=1) * (EG(((((xTIMEWAIT<1)||(SYN<1))||((SYNACK<1)||(xSYNSENT<1)))||((FIN<1)||(xFINWAIT2<1)))...196
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t23, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...168
(forward)formula 0,1,4.77315,102092,1,0,180,526698,90,147,1103,672100,189
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 28 transition count 30
Applied a total of 4 rules in 4 ms. Remains 28 /30 variables (removed 2) and now considering 30/32 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 30 rows 28 cols
[2024-05-28 21:44:31] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-28 21:44:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 21:44:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:44:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 115 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-28 21:44:31] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 26 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:44:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/27 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/28 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 30/58 variables, 28/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/58 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 58/58 variables, and 37 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved in 683 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/27 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/28 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 30/58 variables, 28/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 26/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/58 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 58/58 variables, and 63 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved in 488 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1182ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1184ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 28/30 places, 30/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1311 ms. Remains : 28/30 places, 30/32 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:44:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 21:44:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 21:44:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 30 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:44:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 21:44:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 21:44:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10992452306755236778.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 21:44:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14049129765033590629.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10992452306755236778.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14049129765033590629.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.52538e+06,0.71271,16868,2,6139,5,75715,6,0,145,72851,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(!(A(E(AG((xTIMEWAIT>=1)) U ((((LASTACK>=1)&&(xFINACK>=1))&&(xCLOSED>=1))||(((FIN>=1)&&(xFINWAIT2>=1))&&(CLOSEWAIT>=1)))) U ((LISTEN>=1...171
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!((E(!(((LISTEN>=1)&&(xSYN>=1))) U (!(E(!(E(TRUE U !((xTIMEWAIT>=1)))) U ((((LASTACK>=1)&&(xFINACK>...303
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t20, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...168
(forward)formula 0,1,8.54116,187376,1,0,210,988621,98,164,1106,1.29739e+06,234
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 28 transition count 30
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 27 transition count 29
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 27 transition count 29
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 27 transition count 27
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 27 transition count 25
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 25 transition count 25
Applied a total of 12 rules in 24 ms. Remains 25 /30 variables (removed 5) and now considering 25/32 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 25 rows 25 cols
[2024-05-28 21:44:41] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-28 21:44:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 21:44:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:44:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 50 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 102 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-28 21:44:41] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 23 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:44:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 25/50 variables, 25/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/50 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 50/50 variables, and 34 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 243 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 25/50 variables, 25/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 23/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/50 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 50/50 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 411 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 664ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 664ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 25/30 places, 25/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 796 ms. Remains : 25/30 places, 25/32 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:44:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-28 21:44:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 21:44:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 25 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:44:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 21:44:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 21:44:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9693996997546219505.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 21:44:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9009100851479772493.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9693996997546219505.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9009100851479772493.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,347557,0.505268,12836,2,5997,5,54970,6,0,128,50443,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((CLOSEWAIT>=1)||((FINACK>=1)&&(xLASTACK>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((CLOSEWAIT>=1)||((FINACK>=1)&&(xLASTACK>=1)))))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 17/7/8
(forward)formula 0,0,1.50118,36464,1,0,6,176477,20,1,793,152324,8
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-2024-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 26 transition count 28
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 25 transition count 27
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 25 transition count 27
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 25 transition count 25
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 25 transition count 23
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 23 transition count 23
Applied a total of 16 rules in 6 ms. Remains 23 /30 variables (removed 7) and now considering 23/32 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 23 rows 23 cols
[2024-05-28 21:44:43] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 21:44:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 21:44:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:44:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 41 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 82 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-28 21:44:43] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 21 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:44:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 23/46 variables, 23/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/46 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 46/46 variables, and 32 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 223 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 23/46 variables, 23/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 21/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/46 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 46/46 variables, and 53 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 291 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 523ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 523ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 23/30 places, 23/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 618 ms. Remains : 23/30 places, 23/32 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:44:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 21:44:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 21:44:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 23 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:44:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 21:44:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 21:44:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4356107452787735093.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 21:44:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15975711908371289593.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4356107452787735093.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15975711908371289593.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,150275,0.391189,10976,2,5146,5,42917,6,0,118,38410,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(((FINACK>=1)&&(xCLOSING>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),((FINACK>=1)&&(xCLOSING>=1)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 16/6/7
(forward)formula 0,1,1.09431,23436,1,0,6,102446,19,0,746,87187,8
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-2024-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 26 transition count 28
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 25 transition count 27
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 25 transition count 27
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 25 transition count 25
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 25 transition count 23
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 23 transition count 23
Applied a total of 16 rules in 5 ms. Remains 23 /30 variables (removed 7) and now considering 23/32 (removed 9) transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:44:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:44:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 21:44:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:44:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 44 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 87 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-28 21:44:45] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 21 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:44:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 23/46 variables, 23/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/46 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 46/46 variables, and 32 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 272 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 23/46 variables, 23/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 21/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/46 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 46/46 variables, and 53 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 276 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 556ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 557ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 23/30 places, 23/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 654 ms. Remains : 23/30 places, 23/32 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:44:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 21:44:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 21:44:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 23 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:44:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 21:44:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-28 21:44:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4251359177182032170.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 21:44:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4959103198641982457.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4251359177182032170.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4959103198641982457.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,150275,0.281959,10972,2,5146,5,42917,6,0,118,38410,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EF((((SYN>=1)&&(SYNACK>=1))&&(xSYNSENT>=1))) + AF(EG(((FINACK>=1)&&(xCLOSING>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(E(TRUE U (((SYN>=1)&&(SYNACK>=1))&&(xSYNSENT>=1))) + !(EG(!(EG(((FINACK>=1)&&(xCLOSING>=1))))))))] !...162
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,4.59347,102252,1,0,11,555235,30,4,782,530329,13
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-2024-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 30 transition count 31
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 30 transition count 30
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 29 transition count 30
Applied a total of 3 rules in 6 ms. Remains 29 /30 variables (removed 1) and now considering 30/32 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 30 rows 29 cols
[2024-05-28 21:44:50] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 21:44:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 21:44:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:44:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 48 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 98 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-28 21:44:50] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 27 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:44:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/59 variables, 29/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/59 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 59/59 variables, and 38 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved in 413 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 29/29 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/59 variables, 29/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 27/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/59 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 59/59 variables, and 65 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved in 446 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 29/29 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 873ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 27 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 874ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 29/30 places, 30/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 984 ms. Remains : 29/30 places, 30/32 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:44:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 21:44:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 21:44:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 30 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:44:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 21:44:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 21:44:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5561217060253735551.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 21:44:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11363831952906780077.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5561217060253735551.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11363831952906780077.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.03302e+06,0.757239,22452,2,8042,5,113516,6,0,149,104599,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((A((EF(((FINACK>=1)&&(xFINWAIT1>=1))) + (xTIMEWAIT>=1)) U ((xESTAB>=1) * A(((CLOSED>=1)||((FINWAIT1>=1)&&(xFIN>=1))) U ((FINWAIT2>=1)&...337
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!((E(!(((xESTAB>=1) * !((E(!(((FINWAIT2>=1)&&(xFIN>=1))) U (!(((CLOSED>=1)||((FINWAIT1>=1)&&(xFIN>=1...939
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t21, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...168
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2024-05-28 21:45:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 21:45:21] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-28 21:45:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8333720193768378949.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8333720193768378949.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8333720193768378949.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8333720193768378949.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8333720193768378949.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-28 21:45:21] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-28 21:45:21] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-28 21:45:21] [INFO ] Removed a total of 16 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:45:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-28 21:45:21] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 6 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2024-05-28 21:45:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12360180718748317076.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 21:45:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7885118828216052191.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12360180718748317076.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7885118828216052191.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.03302e+06,2.33971,52848,4231,1257,62812,8432,133,287877,59,208135,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((A((EF(((i1.u4.FINACK>=1)&&(i1.u4.xFINWAIT1>=1))) + (i1.u4.xTIMEWAIT>=1)) U ((i1.u3.xESTAB>=1) * A(((i3.u2.CLOSED>=1)||((u0.FINWAIT1>=...436
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!((E(!(((i1.u3.xESTAB>=1) * !((E(!(((u0.FINWAIT2>=1)&&(i1.u5.xFIN>=1))) U (!(((i3.u2.CLOSED>=1)||((u...1176
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, i1.t21, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/t...171
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 27 transition count 29
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 25 transition count 27
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 25 transition count 27
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 25 transition count 26
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 25 transition count 25
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 24 transition count 25
Applied a total of 13 rules in 8 ms. Remains 24 /30 variables (removed 6) and now considering 25/32 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 25 rows 24 cols
[2024-05-28 21:45:51] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 21:45:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 21:45:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:45:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 128 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-28 21:45:51] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 22 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:45:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 5/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/24 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 25/49 variables, 24/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/49 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 49/49 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved in 379 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 5/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/24 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 25/49 variables, 24/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 22/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/49 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 49/49 variables, and 55 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved in 301 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 686ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 687ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 24/30 places, 25/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 829 ms. Remains : 24/30 places, 25/32 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:45:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 21:45:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 21:45:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 25 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:45:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 21:45:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 21:45:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18010332894174757155.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 21:45:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11845459692979650382.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18010332894174757155.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11845459692979650382.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,182797,0.449808,11508,2,6158,5,47793,6,0,124,43252,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(E(EF(!(((LISTEN>=1)&&(xSYN>=1)))) U ((FIN>=1)&&(xFINWAIT1>=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(E(TRUE U !(((LISTEN>=1)&&(xSYN>=1)))) U ((FIN>=1)&&(xFINWAIT1>=1))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,1.54746,29752,1,0,7,133628,20,1,790,106792,13
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-2024-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2024-05-28 21:45:54] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 21:45:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 21:45:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:45:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 48 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 87 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:45:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 465 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 567 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1039ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1039ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1128 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:45:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 21:45:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 21:45:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:45:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 21:45:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 21:45:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9682566493772601483.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 21:45:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2554195315293468882.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9682566493772601483.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2554195315293468882.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.98583e+06,0.689665,20776,2,7663,5,103918,6,0,155,96180,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E(AX(EX(EG(((SYN>=1)&&(xSYNSENT>=1))))) U (AF((((xCLOSED>=1)&&(SYNACK>=1)) * ((xSYNRCVD>=1) * AF((xLISTEN>=1))))) + A(((FINWAIT1>=1)&&...205
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(!(EX(!(EX(EG(((SYN>=1)&&(xSYNSENT>=1))))))) U (!(EG(!((((xCLOSED>=1)&&(SYNACK>=1)) * ((x...402
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t24, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...168
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,23.5435,502884,1,0,214,2.9029e+06,113,157,1187,3.03478e+06,241
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 30 transition count 30
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 30/32 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 30 rows 30 cols
[2024-05-28 21:46:18] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 7 ms
[2024-05-28 21:46:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 21:46:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:46:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 56 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 119 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-28 21:46:18] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:46:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 30/60 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/60 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 60/60 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 447 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 30/60 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/60 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 60/60 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 454 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 908ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 908ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 30/30 places, 30/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1039 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 30/32 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:46:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 21:46:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 21:46:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 30 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:46:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 21:46:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 21:46:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1040022472030969025.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 21:46:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8990720955410888308.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1040022472030969025.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8990720955410888308.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.98583e+06,0.822246,22140,2,7262,5,109978,6,0,153,105903,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((AG(A((CLOSED>=1) U !(((xESTAB>=1)||(xCLOSED>=1))))) + EF(EG(((FIN>=1)&&(xFINWAIT2>=1))))) + (((ESTAB>=1)&&(xFIN>=1))||((FINACK>=1)&&...173
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((!(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(!(((xESTAB>=1)||(xCLOSED>=1)))) U (!((CLOSED>=1)) * !(!(((xESTAB>=1)||(xCLOSE...325
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t22, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...168
(forward)formula 0,1,4.4218,91796,1,0,98,487599,101,56,1140,508268,128
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-2024-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2024-05-28 21:46:24] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 21:46:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 21:46:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:46:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 48 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 95 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:46:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 618 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 522 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1152ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1153ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1248 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:46:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 21:46:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 21:46:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:46:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 21:46:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 21:46:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9418264579314662909.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 21:46:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7971945104891500877.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9418264579314662909.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7971945104891500877.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.98583e+06,0.783414,20776,2,7663,5,103918,6,0,155,96180,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((((CLOSEWAIT>=1)||((SYNSENT>=1)&&(xSYN>=1))) + ((AF((((FINWAIT1<1)||(xFINACK<1))&&(xLISTEN<1))) * EG(!(A(((FINACK>=1)&&(xCLOSING>=1)) ...216
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * ((CLOSEWAIT>=1)||((SYNSENT>=1)&&(xSYN>=1))))] != FALSE + [FwdG(((EY(Init) * ((ESTAB<1)||(xFIN<1)))...374
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t24, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...168
(forward)formula 0,1,13.6636,293760,1,0,501,1.65772e+06,101,276,1128,1.92651e+06,610
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-2024-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 28 transition count 30
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 27 transition count 29
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 27 transition count 29
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 27 transition count 28
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 27 transition count 27
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 26 transition count 27
Applied a total of 9 rules in 6 ms. Remains 26 /30 variables (removed 4) and now considering 27/32 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 27 rows 26 cols
[2024-05-28 21:46:39] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 21:46:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 21:46:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:46:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 55 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 99 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-28 21:46:39] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 24 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:46:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 6/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/26 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 27/53 variables, 26/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/53 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 53/53 variables, and 35 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 470 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 26/26 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 6/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/26 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 27/53 variables, 26/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 24/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/53 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 53/53 variables, and 59 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved in 381 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 26/26 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 859ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 24 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 860ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 26/30 places, 27/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 973 ms. Remains : 26/30 places, 27/32 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:46:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 21:46:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 21:46:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 27 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:46:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 21:46:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 21:46:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3171624536233029924.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 21:46:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8705876876755490646.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3171624536233029924.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8705876876755490646.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,499923,0.414532,14452,2,7116,5,67942,6,0,134,60138,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EF(((((FINWAIT1>=1)&&(xFIN>=1))&&((SYNSENT>=1)&&(xSYN>=1))) * (EF(((FINWAIT2>=1)&&(xFIN>=1))) * (AG(((LISTEN>=1)&&(xSYN>=1))) + (((TIME...284
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(!(((LISTEN>=1)&&(xSYN>=1))) U (!((((SYNSENT>=1)&&(xSYN>=1))&&(xSYNACK>=1))) * !(((LISTEN>=...758
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 20/0/7
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,5.53828,121816,1,0,13,671598,36,4,881,547178,19
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2024-05-28 21:46:45] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-28 21:46:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 21:46:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:46:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 102 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:46:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 532 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 719 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1262ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1265ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1368 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:46:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-28 21:46:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 21:46:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:46:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-28 21:46:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 21:46:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2435802420525551837.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 21:46:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8494469215482622217.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2435802420525551837.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8494469215482622217.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.98583e+06,0.678637,20772,2,7663,5,103918,6,0,155,96180,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((((EF(((LISTEN>=1)&&(xSYN>=1))) + AG((ESTAB>=1))) + (EX((((SYNSENT<1)||(xSYN<1))||(xSYNACK<1))) + (xTIMEWAIT>=1))) + (((FIN<1)||(xFINW...253
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(((E(TRUE U ((LISTEN>=1)&&(xSYN>=1))) + !(E(TRUE U !((ESTAB>=1))))) + (EX((((SYNSENT<1)||(xSYN<1))||(...326
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t24, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...168
(forward)formula 0,1,4.41568,93024,1,0,76,481917,97,44,1195,488071,100
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 29 transition count 31
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 28 transition count 30
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 28 transition count 30
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 28 /30 variables (removed 2) and now considering 30/32 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 30 rows 28 cols
[2024-05-28 21:46:51] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-28 21:46:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 21:46:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:46:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 58 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 109 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-28 21:46:51] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 26 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:46:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/27 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/28 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 30/58 variables, 28/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/58 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 58/58 variables, and 37 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved in 575 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/27 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/28 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 30/58 variables, 28/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 26/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/58 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 58/58 variables, and 63 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved in 647 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1233ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1238ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 28/30 places, 30/32 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1356 ms. Remains : 28/30 places, 30/32 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:46:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 21:46:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 21:46:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 30 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:46:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 21:46:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 21:46:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15003898422615738749.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 21:46:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2575936146079972051.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15003898422615738749.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2575936146079972051.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.13746e+06,0.593008,17444,2,8060,5,83768,6,0,145,77369,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((((FINACK<1)||(xFINWAIT1<1)) + (AF(((LISTEN<1) + !(E((((SYNSENT>=1)&&(xSYN>=1))&&(xSYNACK>=1)) U (CLOSEWAIT>=1))))) + ((((LISTEN>=1)&...334
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((((FINACK<1)||(xFINWAIT1<1)) + (!(EG(!(((LISTEN<1) + !(E((((SYNSENT>=1)&&(xSYN>=1))...672
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 19/18/11
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,5.22607,115284,1,0,27,642360,37,13,930,598418,16
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 32/32 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 30 cols
[2024-05-28 21:46:58] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-28 21:46:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2024-05-28 21:46:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-28 21:46:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 55 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 91 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-28 21:46:58] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 28 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:46:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 753 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/29 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 32/62 variables, 30/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 28/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved in 546 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1312ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1313ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1412 ms. Remains : 30/30 places, 32/32 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:46:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-28 21:46:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 21:46:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 32 transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:46:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 21:46:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 21:46:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13676545637912528521.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-28 21:46:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3035075319734222549.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13676545637912528521.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3035075319734222549.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.98583e+06,0.997134,20780,2,7663,5,103918,6,0,155,96180,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF((EG(((LISTEN>=1)&&(xSYN>=1))) * (((SYN>=1)&&(xLISTEN>=1)) + (((((FIN<1)||(xESTAB<1))&&((SYN<1)||(xSYNSENT<1)))||(xCLOSED>=1)) * (!(A(...455
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(FwdU((Init * E(TRUE U (EG(((LISTEN>=1)&&(xSYN>=1))) * (((SYN>=1)&&(xLISTEN>=1)) + (((((FIN<1)||(xESTAB<1))&...1695
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t24, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...168
(forward)formula 0,1,7.90951,161220,1,0,169,877931,109,101,1192,987770,217
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2024-05-28 21:47:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 21:47:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-28 21:47:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2024-05-28 21:47:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1200986624565173969.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1200986624565173969.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1200986624565173969.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1200986624565173969.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1200986624565173969.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2024-05-28 21:47:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2024-05-28 21:47:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2024-05-28 21:47:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 22 redundant transitions.
[2024-05-28 21:47:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-28 21:47:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2024-05-28 21:47:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2770444421587980098.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-28 21:47:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4188085551351169705.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2770444421587980098.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4188085551351169705.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 2 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.98583e+06,0.956593,25656,2412,577,48311,4157,135,77035,54,49970,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EG((AF(((u4.SYN<1)||(u7.xSYNSENT<1))) + EX(AF(((i1.u1.FINWAIT2>=1)&&(i3.u6.xFIN>=1)))))) * (AX((((u4.LISTEN<1)||(u4.TIMEWAIT<1))||((i...251
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((EG((!(EG(!(((u4.SYN<1)||(u7.xSYNSENT<1))))) + EX(!(EG(!(((i1.u1.FINWAIT2>=1)&&(i3.u6.xFIN>=1))))))...326
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t8, t24, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/tota...168
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,31.6428,422204,1,0,704047,43629,773,1.63515e+06,323,915274,672154
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-2024-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: EG((A((EF(((u5.FINACK>=1)&&(u5.xFINWAIT1>=1))) + (u5.xTIMEWAIT>=1)) U ((i3.u3.xESTAB>=1) * A(((u4.CLOSED>=1)||((i1.u1.FINWAIT1>=1)&&(i3.u...433
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!((E(!(((i3.u3.xESTAB>=1) * !((E(!(((i1.u1.FINWAIT2>=1)&&(i3.u6.xFIN>=1))) U (!(((u4.CLOSED>=1)||((i...1197
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 1,0,44.2002,557040,1,0,934006,47374,853,2.05003e+06,326,986284,904991
FORMULA TCPcondis-PT-05-CTLFireability-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Total runtime 291159 ms.

BK_STOP 1716932872325

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="TCPcondis-PT-05"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is TCPcondis-PT-05, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r422-smll-171690573400002"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/TCPcondis-PT-05.tgz
mv TCPcondis-PT-05 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;