About the Execution of GreatSPN+red for StigmergyCommit-PT-06a
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
386.264 | 10729.00 | 21343.00 | 81.20 | F | normal |
Execution Chart
We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r408-tall-171690546200098.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool greatspnxred
Input is StigmergyCommit-PT-06a, examination is StableMarking
Time confinement is 1800 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r408-tall-171690546200098
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 2.2M
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.8K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 57K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.1K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 58K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Apr 23 07:59 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K Apr 23 07:59 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K Apr 23 07:59 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 23 07:59 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.9K Apr 11 17:51 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 106K Apr 11 17:51 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.8K Apr 11 17:51 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 74K Apr 11 17:51 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Apr 23 07:59 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 23 07:59 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8M May 18 16:43 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
FORMULA_NAME StableMarking
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1717100308244
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=greatspnxred
BK_EXAMINATION=StableMarking
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=1800
BK_INPUT=StigmergyCommit-PT-06a
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Applying reductions before tool greatspn
Invoking reducer
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-30 20:18:29] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, StableMarking, -timeout, 180, -rebuildPNML]
[2024-05-30 20:18:29] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-30 20:18:29] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 228 ms
[2024-05-30 20:18:29] [INFO ] Transformed 256 places.
[2024-05-30 20:18:29] [INFO ] Transformed 2816 transitions.
[2024-05-30 20:18:29] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-30 20:18:29] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 256 places and 2816 transitions and 35321 arcs in 349 ms.
Structural test allowed to assert that 16 places are NOT stable. Took 11 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 2229 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 2229 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (15 resets) in 2613 ms. (15 steps per ms) remains 34/240 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 25 ms. (154 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 43 ms. (91 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 39 ms. (100 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 25 ms. (154 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
[2024-05-30 20:18:30] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 566 transitions (discarded 21 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 566 rows 256 cols
[2024-05-30 20:18:30] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 21 ms
[2024-05-30 20:18:30] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 351 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 34/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 34 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 34 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 221/255 variables, 7/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 34 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 221/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 34 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 0/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 34 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/256 variables, 1/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 34 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 1/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 34 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 0/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 34 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 565/821 variables, 256/520 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 34 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/821 variables, 350/870 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 34 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/821 variables, 0/870 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 34 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/822 variables, 1/871 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 34 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/822 variables, 0/871 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 34 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/822 variables, 0/871 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 34 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 822/822 variables, and 871 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 34 unsolved in 2693 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 256/256 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 256/256 constraints, ReadFeed: 351/351 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 34/34 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 34 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 34/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 34 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 34 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 221/255 variables, 7/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 34 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 221/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 34 unsolved
[2024-05-30 20:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 158 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 139 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 128 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 143 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 107 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 98 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 95 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 79 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 79 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 82 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 20/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 34 unsolved
[2024-05-30 20:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 20/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 34 unsolved
[2024-05-30 20:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 20/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 34 unsolved
[2024-05-30 20:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-30 20:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 7855ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 34 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 34 out of 256 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 256/256 places, 587/587 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 549 edges and 256 vertex of which 251 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 5 places using SCC suffix rule.6 ms
Discarding 5 places :
Also discarding 5 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 5 transitions
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 22 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 22 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 39 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 39 transitions
Performed 39 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 39
Iterating post reduction 0 with 61 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 251 transition count 521
Reduce places removed 39 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 25 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 25 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 7 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 7 transitions
Performed 7 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 7
Iterating post reduction 1 with 71 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 212 transition count 489
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 205 transition count 489
Performed 41 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 41 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 205 transition count 448
Deduced a syphon composed of 41 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 41 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 82 rules applied. Total rules applied 222 place count 164 transition count 448
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 252 place count 134 transition count 418
Iterating global reduction 3 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 282 place count 134 transition count 418
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 312 place count 104 transition count 388
Iterating global reduction 3 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 342 place count 104 transition count 388
Ensure Unique test removed 132 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 132 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 132 rules applied. Total rules applied 474 place count 104 transition count 256
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 478 place count 100 transition count 252
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 482 place count 100 transition count 252
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 486 place count 96 transition count 248
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 490 place count 96 transition count 248
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 493 place count 96 transition count 245
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 507 place count 89 transition count 238
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 513 place count 83 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 519 place count 83 transition count 232
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 525 place count 77 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 531 place count 77 transition count 226
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 537 place count 71 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 543 place count 71 transition count 220
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 9 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 9 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 552 place count 71 transition count 211
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 14 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 14 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 566 place count 71 transition count 211
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 7 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 7 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 573 place count 71 transition count 204
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 574 place count 70 transition count 203
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 575 place count 69 transition count 203
Performed 14 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 114 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 603 place count 55 transition count 75
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 6 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 614 place count 55 transition count 64
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 616 place count 55 transition count 62
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 5 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 5 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 621 place count 55 transition count 62
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 626 place count 55 transition count 57
Reduce places removed 7 places and 7 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 633 place count 48 transition count 50
Applied a total of 633 rules in 179 ms. Remains 48 /256 variables (removed 208) and now considering 50/587 (removed 537) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 191 ms. Remains : 48/256 places, 50/587 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 788 steps (18 resets) in 15 ms. (49 steps per ms) remains 0/34 properties
Able to resolve query StableMarking after proving 241 properties.
FORMULA StableMarking FALSE TECHNIQUES RANDOM_WALK MARKED_SUFFIX_TEST TOPOLOGICAL
Total runtime 9530 ms.
ITS solved all properties within timeout
BK_STOP 1717100318973
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../reducer/bin//../../itstools//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination StableMarking -timeout 180 -rebuildPNML
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="StigmergyCommit-PT-06a"
export BK_EXAMINATION="StableMarking"
export BK_TOOL="greatspnxred"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="1800"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool greatspnxred"
echo " Input is StigmergyCommit-PT-06a, examination is StableMarking"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r408-tall-171690546200098"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/StigmergyCommit-PT-06a.tgz
mv StigmergyCommit-PT-06a execution
cd execution
if [ "StableMarking" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "Liveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "StableMarking" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "StableMarking" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "StableMarking.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property StableMarking.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "StableMarking.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "StableMarking" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "Liveness" ] || [ "StableMarking" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME StableMarking"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;