Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r400-tall-171690532000297.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is StigmergyElection-PT-05a, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r400-tall-171690532000297
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 700K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 71K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.5K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 73K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K Apr 23 07:59 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K Apr 23 07:59 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Apr 23 07:59 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K Apr 23 07:59 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K Apr 11 19:10 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 142K Apr 11 19:10 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K Apr 11 19:08 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 99K Apr 11 19:08 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Apr 23 07:59 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 23 07:59 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 193K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1717007505136

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=StigmergyElection-PT-05a
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-29 18:31:46] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-29 18:31:46] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-29 18:31:46] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 95 ms
[2024-05-29 18:31:46] [INFO ] Transformed 72 places.
[2024-05-29 18:31:46] [INFO ] Transformed 450 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:31:46] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-29 18:31:46] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 72 places and 450 transitions and 3637 arcs in 194 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 18 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
Ensure Unique test removed 291 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 291 transitions.
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2024-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 46 out of 72 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 72/72 places, 159/159 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 69 transition count 155
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 69 transition count 155
Applied a total of 6 rules in 18 ms. Remains 69 /72 variables (removed 3) and now considering 155/159 (removed 4) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:31:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 143 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 143 rows 69 cols
[2024-05-29 18:31:46] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 12 ms
[2024-05-29 18:31:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 206 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:31:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 143 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:31:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:31:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 86 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:31:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 125 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 360 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 154 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:31:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 143 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:31:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:31:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 86 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/69 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 20/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 20/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 7/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 3/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 6/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 142/211 variables, 69/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 85/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 0/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/212 variables, 1/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 0/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/212 variables, 0/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 212/212 variables, and 215 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved in 7903 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 69/69 constraints, ReadFeed: 86/86 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 154/154 constraints, Known Traps: 56/56 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/69 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 56/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:31:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 142/211 variables, 69/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 85/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 154/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 0/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/212 variables, 1/370 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 0/370 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/212 variables, 0/370 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 212/212 variables, and 370 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved in 8229 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 69/69 constraints, ReadFeed: 86/86 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 154/154 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints]
After SMT, in 16397ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 16414ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 69/72 places, 155/159 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 16815 ms. Remains : 69/72 places, 155/159 transitions.
Support contains 46 out of 69 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-29 18:32:03] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2024-05-29 18:32:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:03] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2024-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-29 18:32:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 155 transitions.
Support contains 43 out of 69 places (down from 46) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (163 resets) in 1703 ms. (23 steps per ms) remains 3/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (221 resets) in 225 ms. (177 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (12 resets) in 202 ms. (197 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (14 resets) in 89 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
[2024-05-29 18:32:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 143 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:32:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:32:04] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 86 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 58/69 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 142/211 variables, 69/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 85/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 0/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/212 variables, 1/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/212 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 212/212 variables, and 159 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 114 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 69/69 constraints, ReadFeed: 86/86 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 58/69 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp0 is UNSAT
[2024-05-29 18:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp34 is UNSAT
[2024-05-29 18:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp35 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 69/212 variables, and 15 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 0 unsolved in 460 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 0/69 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/86 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/3 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints]
After SMT, in 585ms problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 11 simplifications.
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2024-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 155 transitions.
Computed a total of 12 stabilizing places and 11 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 69/69 places, 155/155 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 62 transition count 143
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 62 transition count 143
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 58 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 58 transition count 135
Applied a total of 22 rules in 6 ms. Remains 58 /69 variables (removed 11) and now considering 135/155 (removed 20) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 129 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 129 rows 58 cols
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 10 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 129 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 86 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 102 ms returned [57]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 155 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 57/69 places, 135/155 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 47 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 47 transition count 125
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 43 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 43 transition count 121
Applied a total of 28 rules in 4 ms. Remains 43 /57 variables (removed 14) and now considering 121/135 (removed 14) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 115 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 115 rows 43 cols
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 115 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 55 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 84 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 43/69 places, 121/155 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 250 ms. Remains : 43/69 places, 121/155 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 121 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16034438205888169231.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16108827113686275132.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16034438205888169231.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16108827113686275132.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3379,0.03784,4504,2,450,5,2926,6,0,287,1877,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX(AX(AG((p52==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(!(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !((p52==0)))))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t11, t13, t14, t16, t18, t19, t21, t23, t24, t35, t36, t37, t38, t40,...285
(forward)formula 0,1,0.141526,8812,1,0,197,24412,257,69,2796,18803,270
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2024-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 69/69 places, 155/155 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 64 transition count 147
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 64 transition count 147
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 63 transition count 145
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 63 transition count 145
Applied a total of 12 rules in 4 ms. Remains 63 /69 variables (removed 6) and now considering 145/155 (removed 10) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 137 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 137 rows 63 cols
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 137 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 86 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 107 ms returned [62]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 151 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/69 places, 145/155 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 58 transition count 141
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 58 transition count 141
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 57 transition count 140
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 57 transition count 140
Applied a total of 10 rules in 4 ms. Remains 57 /62 variables (removed 5) and now considering 140/145 (removed 5) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 132 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 132 rows 57 cols
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 132 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 111 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 57/69 places, 140/155 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 270 ms. Remains : 57/69 places, 140/155 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 140 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9313650675805074991.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10803273623382088246.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9313650675805074991.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10803273623382088246.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4377,0.038592,4772,2,754,5,4629,6,0,360,3110,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EF(AX(((p61==0)&&(p32==1)))) * EF((AF(AX(((p13==0)&&(p69==1)))) * (E((p34==0) U (p34==0)) + AG(((p16==0)&&(p0==1))))))) * A((EG(((p19==...236
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((Init * (E(TRUE U !(EX(!(((p61==0)&&(p32==1)))))) * E(TRUE U (!(EG(!(!(EX(!(((p13==0)&&(p69==1)))))))) * (E((...462
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t7, t9, t11, t12, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t21, t23, t24, t26, t27, t29,...331
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,0.316096,15120,1,0,293,52593,330,124,3308,44308,393
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2024-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 69/69 places, 155/155 transitions.
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 69 transition count 148
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 62 transition count 148
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 56 transition count 138
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 56 transition count 138
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 52 transition count 131
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 52 transition count 131
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 52 transition count 130
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 50 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 50 transition count 128
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 50 transition count 122
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 46 transition count 118
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 43 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 43 transition count 115
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 5 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 5 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 43 transition count 110
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 38 transition count 105
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 38 transition count 105
Applied a total of 75 rules in 57 ms. Remains 38 /69 variables (removed 31) and now considering 105/155 (removed 50) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 98 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 38 cols
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 98 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 74 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned [37]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 115 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 37/69 places, 105/155 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 37 transition count 104
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 36 transition count 104
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 28 transition count 96
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 52 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 52 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 28 transition count 44
Applied a total of 70 rules in 13 ms. Remains 28 /37 variables (removed 9) and now considering 44/105 (removed 61) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 38 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 38 rows 28 cols
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 21 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 38 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 37 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 59 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 28/69 places, 44/155 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 246 ms. Remains : 28/69 places, 44/155 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 44 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8286095505102386089.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17140916942508554662.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8286095505102386089.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17140916942508554662.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,178,0.011222,3628,2,188,5,870,6,0,149,675,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((p35==1) * AF(!(((p41==0)||(p31==1))))) U (!((!(AG(A(((p14==0)||(p35==1)) U (p57==1)))) * EF(EG((p0==1))))) * (p51==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!((!(!(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!((p57==1)) U (!(((p14==0)||(p35==1))) * !((p57==1)))) + EG(!((p57==1))...567
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t13, t15, t26, t32, t33, t34, t35, t36, t37, t42...255
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,0.035416,5000,1,0,112,5354,125,54,1040,5021,131
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 69/69 places, 155/155 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 62 transition count 143
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 62 transition count 143
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 58 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 58 transition count 135
Applied a total of 22 rules in 9 ms. Remains 58 /69 variables (removed 11) and now considering 135/155 (removed 20) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 129 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 129 rows 58 cols
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 129 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 86 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 97 ms returned [57]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 139 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 57/69 places, 135/155 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 47 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 47 transition count 125
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 42 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 42 transition count 120
Applied a total of 30 rules in 4 ms. Remains 42 /57 variables (removed 15) and now considering 120/135 (removed 15) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 114 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 42 cols
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 114 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 60 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 92 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 42/69 places, 120/155 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 244 ms. Remains : 42/69 places, 120/155 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 120 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8503066441334919438.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7010205263333264555.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8503066441334919438.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7010205263333264555.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3378,0.044233,4972,2,544,5,3904,6,0,282,3098,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(EX((p54!=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX((p54!=1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t11, t13, t14, t16, t18, t19, t21, t23, t24, t36, t37, t38, t40, t41,...285
(forward)formula 0,1,0.160502,9460,1,0,190,23204,254,63,2810,16990,251
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2024-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 69/69 places, 155/155 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 62 transition count 143
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 62 transition count 143
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 59 transition count 137
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 59 transition count 137
Applied a total of 20 rules in 8 ms. Remains 59 /69 variables (removed 10) and now considering 137/155 (removed 18) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 131 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 131 rows 59 cols
[2024-05-29 18:32:06] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 131 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 86 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 106 ms returned [58]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 148 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 58/69 places, 137/155 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 50 transition count 129
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 50 transition count 129
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 48 transition count 127
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 48 transition count 127
Applied a total of 20 rules in 5 ms. Remains 48 /58 variables (removed 10) and now considering 127/137 (removed 10) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 121 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 121 rows 48 cols
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 121 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 60 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 89 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 48/69 places, 127/155 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 250 ms. Remains : 48/69 places, 127/155 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 127 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12700047697254156622.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2641689752035797252.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12700047697254156622.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2641689752035797252.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3894,0.045295,5008,2,607,5,3995,6,0,313,2943,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AX((AG(EX((p66==0))) * ((!(A((p59==1) U ((p11==0)||(p38==1)))) + (p58==0)) + (p13==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EX(!((!(E(TRUE U !(EX((p66==0))))) * ((!(!((E(!(((p11==0)||(p38==1))) U (!((p59==1)) * !(((p11==0...242
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t5, t6, t8, t10, t11, t13, t15, t16, t18, t20, t21, t23, t25, t26, t30, t31, t32,...315
(forward)formula 0,1,0.188653,10288,1,0,218,25512,280,73,2958,22027,284
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2024-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 69/69 places, 155/155 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 63 transition count 145
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 63 transition count 145
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 60 transition count 139
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 60 transition count 139
Applied a total of 18 rules in 4 ms. Remains 60 /69 variables (removed 9) and now considering 139/155 (removed 16) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 132 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 132 rows 60 cols
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 132 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 86 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 93 ms returned [59]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 127 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 59/69 places, 139/155 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 52 transition count 132
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 52 transition count 132
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 48 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 48 transition count 128
Applied a total of 22 rules in 8 ms. Remains 48 /59 variables (removed 11) and now considering 128/139 (removed 11) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 121 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 121 rows 48 cols
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 121 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 63 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 98 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 48/69 places, 128/155 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 237 ms. Remains : 48/69 places, 128/155 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 128 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1363645734263396278.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6057515366384468774.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1363645734263396278.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6057515366384468774.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4259,0.036175,4692,2,702,5,4369,6,0,313,2893,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX((p39==0)) + EG((!(E((p29==1) U ((p24==0)||(p67==1)))) + E(EF((p67==1)) U (E((p28==0) U ((p59==0)||(p17==1))) * !(((p67==0)||(p4==1)))...160
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * (p39==0))] != FALSE + [FwdG(Init,(!(E((p29==1) U ((p24==0)||(p67==1)))) + E(E(TRUE U (p67==1)) U (...229
(forward)formula 0,1,0.038367,5008,1,0,7,4369,8,1,499,2893,2
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2024-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 69/69 places, 155/155 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 13 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 13 transitions
Performed 13 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 13
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 67 transition count 141
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 54 transition count 138
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 51 transition count 138
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 51 transition count 130
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 43 transition count 130
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 38 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 38 transition count 122
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 36 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 36 transition count 118
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 36 transition count 117
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 52 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 52 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 36 transition count 65
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 36 transition count 64
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 35 transition count 64
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 31 transition count 60
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 31 transition count 60
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 31 transition count 59
Reduce places removed 5 places and 5 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 26 transition count 54
Applied a total of 133 rules in 29 ms. Remains 26 /69 variables (removed 43) and now considering 54/155 (removed 101) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 48 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 48 rows 26 cols
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 21 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 48 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 32 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 55 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 32 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 48 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/26 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 20/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 3/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 47/73 variables, 26/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 4/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/74 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/74 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 74/74 variables, and 56 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved in 1446 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 26/26 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/26 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 28/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 47/73 variables, 26/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 32/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/74 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/74 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 74/74 variables, and 88 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved in 500 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 26/26 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints]
After SMT, in 1952ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1953ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 26/69 places, 54/155 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2042 ms. Remains : 26/69 places, 54/155 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:32:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 54 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:32:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10839223479646814649.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18356779159511164890.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10839223479646814649.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18356779159511164890.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,332,0.017831,3856,2,207,5,1391,6,0,152,894,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E(A((p65!=0) U (E((p2==1) U ((p32==0)||(p33==1))) + (p46==1))) U !(((p16==1)||(p39!=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(!((E(!((E((p2==1) U ((p32==0)||(p33==1))) + (p46==1))) U (!((p65!=0)) * !((E((p2==1) U (...286
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t15, t17, t18, t24, t31, t36, Interse...245
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,0.069057,6020,1,0,171,14112,137,101,1293,12858,200
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 69/69 places, 155/155 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 64 transition count 147
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 64 transition count 147
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 62 transition count 143
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 62 transition count 143
Applied a total of 14 rules in 4 ms. Remains 62 /69 variables (removed 7) and now considering 143/155 (removed 12) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:32:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 135 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 135 rows 62 cols
[2024-05-29 18:32:09] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:32:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 135 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:32:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:32:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 86 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:32:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 91 ms returned [61]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 133 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 61/69 places, 143/155 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 55 transition count 137
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 55 transition count 137
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 53 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 53 transition count 135
Applied a total of 16 rules in 4 ms. Remains 53 /61 variables (removed 8) and now considering 135/143 (removed 8) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:32:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 127 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 127 rows 53 cols
[2024-05-29 18:32:10] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:32:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 127 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:32:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:32:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:32:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 55 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 88 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 53/69 places, 135/155 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 229 ms. Remains : 53/69 places, 135/155 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:32:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 135 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:32:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17986709123373001107.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5385115214968508592.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17986709123373001107.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5385115214968508592.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4343,0.034992,4744,2,643,5,3881,6,0,339,2565,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AX((EF(!(A(((p65==0)||(p69==1)) U ((p15==0)||(p37==1))))) + ((EX((p38==0)) * (p47==0)) * ((p66==0)||(p10==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(((EX((p38==0)) * (p47==0)) * ((p66==0)||(p10==1))))) * !(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(((p15==0)|...266
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t11, t12, t14, t16, t17, t19, t21, t22, t24, t25, t27, t29, t30, t32,...321
(forward)formula 0,1,0.2946,14828,1,0,247,49564,296,95,3044,40256,333
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2024-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 69/69 places, 155/155 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 63 transition count 144
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 63 transition count 144
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 59 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 59 transition count 136
Applied a total of 20 rules in 2 ms. Remains 59 /69 variables (removed 10) and now considering 136/155 (removed 19) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:32:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 129 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 129 rows 59 cols
[2024-05-29 18:32:10] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:32:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 129 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:32:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:32:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 86 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:32:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 103 ms returned [58]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 148 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 58/69 places, 136/155 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 49 transition count 127
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 49 transition count 127
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 45 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 45 transition count 123
Applied a total of 26 rules in 2 ms. Remains 45 /58 variables (removed 13) and now considering 123/136 (removed 13) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:32:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 116 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 45 cols
[2024-05-29 18:32:10] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:32:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 116 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:32:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:32:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:32:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 49 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 79 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 45/69 places, 123/155 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 231 ms. Remains : 45/69 places, 123/155 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:32:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 123 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:32:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12000481538856969662.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14090649917752022082.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12000481538856969662.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14090649917752022082.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3380,0.02883,4672,2,462,5,3027,6,0,294,1875,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((EX(TRUE) * (p65==1)) U EF(!(EF((p50==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (p50==1)))))))) * !(E(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (p50==1))))) U (!((EX(TRUE) * (...215
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t8, t9, t11, t13, t14, t16, t18, t19, t21, t23, t24, t32, t39, t40, t42, t43, t11...281
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,0.183553,10532,1,0,235,31802,268,95,2879,26913,332
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-05a-CTLCardinality-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2024-05-29 18:32:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:32:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Total runtime 24642 ms.

BK_STOP 1717007530973

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="StigmergyElection-PT-05a"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is StigmergyElection-PT-05a, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r400-tall-171690532000297"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/StigmergyElection-PT-05a.tgz
mv StigmergyElection-PT-05a execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;