Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r400-tall-171690532000281.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is StigmergyElection-PT-04a, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r400-tall-171690532000281
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 416K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 72K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.6K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 50K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.4K Apr 23 07:59 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 23K Apr 23 07:59 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K Apr 23 07:59 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K Apr 23 07:59 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.0K Apr 11 18:42 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 67K Apr 11 18:42 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K Apr 11 18:42 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 51K Apr 11 18:42 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Apr 23 07:59 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K Apr 23 07:59 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 71K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1717006911176

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=StigmergyElection-PT-04a
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-29 18:21:52] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-29 18:21:52] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-29 18:21:52] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 76 ms
[2024-05-29 18:21:52] [INFO ] Transformed 58 places.
[2024-05-29 18:21:52] [INFO ] Transformed 218 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:21:52] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-29 18:21:52] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 58 places and 218 transitions and 1238 arcs in 173 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 15 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
Ensure Unique test removed 110 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 110 transitions.
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 50 out of 58 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 58/58 places, 108/108 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 57 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 57 transition count 107
Applied a total of 2 rules in 26 ms. Remains 57 /58 variables (removed 1) and now considering 107/108 (removed 1) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:21:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 96 transitions (discarded 11 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 96 rows 57 cols
[2024-05-29 18:21:52] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 9 ms
[2024-05-29 18:21:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 168 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:21:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 96 transitions (discarded 11 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:21:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:21:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:21:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 273 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 106 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:21:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 96 transitions (discarded 11 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:21:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:21:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/57 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 65 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 20/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 6/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:21:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 2/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 95/152 variables, 57/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 48/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/153 variables, 1/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/153 variables, 0/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 153/153 variables, and 138 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved in 3956 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 57/57 constraints, ReadFeed: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/57 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 28/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 1/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 95/152 variables, 57/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 48/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 106/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/153 variables, 1/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/153 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 153/153 variables, and 245 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved in 3050 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 57/57 constraints, ReadFeed: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints]
After SMT, in 7122ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 106 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7146ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 57/58 places, 107/108 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7473 ms. Remains : 57/58 places, 107/108 transitions.
Support contains 50 out of 57 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
Support contains 48 out of 57 places (down from 50) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (332 resets) in 1104 ms. (36 steps per ms) remains 3/58 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (370 resets) in 186 ms. (213 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 127 ms. (312 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (32 resets) in 161 ms. (246 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
[2024-05-29 18:22:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 96 transitions (discarded 11 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:22:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:22:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp4 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp17 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 46/56 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/57 variables, 1/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 95/152 variables, 57/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 48/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/153 variables, 1/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/153 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 153/153 variables, and 110 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved in 60 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 57/57 constraints, ReadFeed: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 25/28 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp36 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 28/153 variables, and 2 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 0 unsolved in 44 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/4 constraints, State Equation: 0/57 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/3 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 116ms problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 13 simplifications.
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2024-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2024-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 107 transitions.
Computed a total of 10 stabilizing places and 9 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 57/57 places, 107/107 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 52 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 52 transition count 98
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 49 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 49 transition count 92
Applied a total of 16 rules in 4 ms. Remains 49 /57 variables (removed 8) and now considering 92/107 (removed 15) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 49 cols
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 59 ms returned [48]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 97 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 48/57 places, 92/107 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 43 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 43 transition count 87
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 42 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 42 transition count 86
Applied a total of 12 rules in 4 ms. Remains 42 /48 variables (removed 6) and now considering 86/92 (removed 6) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 80 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 42 cols
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 80 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 41 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 69 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 42/57 places, 86/107 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 176 ms. Remains : 42/57 places, 86/107 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 86 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12714121431380958314.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8423224436859043637.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12714121431380958314.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8423224436859043637.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,847,0.025268,3840,2,321,5,1642,6,0,246,1076,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(E(EF((p11==0)) U AF((!((((p40==0)||(p32==1))||((p27==0)||(p52==1)))) * EG((p56==0)))))) * EF((((p51==0) + (AX(FALSE) * ((((p51==0)||(p...226
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,E(TRUE U (p11==0))) * !(EG(!((!((((p40==0)||(p32==1))||((p27==0)||(p52==1)))) * EG((p56==0)))))))] ...359
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t7, t8, t10, t11, t15, t16, t18, t20, t21, t23, t24, t25, t29, t31, t33, t40,...274
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,0.103671,7396,1,0,191,18978,214,85,1949,17009,252
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2024-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 57/57 places, 107/107 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 51 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 51 transition count 97
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 47 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 47 transition count 89
Applied a total of 20 rules in 6 ms. Remains 47 /57 variables (removed 10) and now considering 89/107 (removed 18) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 47 cols
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 63 ms returned [46]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 115 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 46/57 places, 89/107 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 41 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 41 transition count 84
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 40 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 40 transition count 83
Applied a total of 12 rules in 2 ms. Remains 40 /46 variables (removed 6) and now considering 83/89 (removed 6) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 78 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 40 cols
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 78 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 47 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 78 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 40/57 places, 83/107 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 201 ms. Remains : 40/57 places, 83/107 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 83 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17531081683245381027.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7648210926970653971.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17531081683245381027.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7648210926970653971.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,783,0.015869,3984,2,292,5,1631,6,0,238,1160,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AF(EX(EF((p21==0)))) U (!(AF(((p9==1)||(p38==1)))) * !(AX((p51==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(!(EG(!(((p9==1)||(p38==1)))))) * !(!(EX(!((p51==0)))))))))) * !(E(!((!(!(EG(!(((p9==1)||(p38...307
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t11, t13, t14, t16, t18, t19, t21, t23, t24, t25, t27, t30, t31, t34,...274
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,0.076346,6676,1,0,162,13523,200,68,1789,11917,210
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 57/57 places, 107/107 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 51 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 51 transition count 97
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 47 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 47 transition count 89
Applied a total of 20 rules in 6 ms. Remains 47 /57 variables (removed 10) and now considering 89/107 (removed 18) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 47 cols
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned [46]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 115 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 46/57 places, 89/107 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 38 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 38 transition count 81
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 34 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 34 transition count 77
Applied a total of 24 rules in 4 ms. Remains 34 /46 variables (removed 12) and now considering 77/89 (removed 12) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 72 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 34 cols
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 24 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 72 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 52 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 79 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 34/57 places, 77/107 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 205 ms. Remains : 34/57 places, 77/107 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 77 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13447181636786791984.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2738764049221542332.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13447181636786791984.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2738764049221542332.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,714,0.013867,3956,2,237,5,1280,6,0,208,871,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AX(FALSE))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EX(!(FALSE))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t11, t13, t14, t16, t18, t19, t29, t30, t32, t33, t69, t71, t73, t75,...254
(forward)formula 0,0,0.041645,5064,1,0,127,7430,163,46,1554,5993,154
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2024-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 57/57 places, 107/107 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 52 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 52 transition count 99
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 50 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 50 transition count 95
Applied a total of 14 rules in 2 ms. Remains 50 /57 variables (removed 7) and now considering 95/107 (removed 12) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 50 cols
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 60 ms returned [49]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 96 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/57 places, 95/107 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 45 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 45 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 44 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 44 transition count 90
Applied a total of 10 rules in 2 ms. Remains 44 /49 variables (removed 5) and now considering 90/95 (removed 5) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 44 cols
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 22 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 42 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 67 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 44/57 places, 90/107 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 169 ms. Remains : 44/57 places, 90/107 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 90 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12031976999791616922.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality388439401195690302.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12031976999791616922.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality388439401195690302.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,950,0.02402,4020,2,419,5,2065,6,0,260,1639,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(!(AX((p19==0))) U A(!(E(EX(TRUE) U (((p51==1)||(p54==0))||(p42==1)))) U (!(EF(((p28==0)||(p18==1)))) + ((EX(((p2==0)||(p26==1))) + !(...220
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(((FwdU((FwdU(Init,!(!((E(!((!(E(TRUE U ((p28==0)||(p18==1)))) + ((EX(((p2==0)||(p26==1))) + !(((p35==0)...2069
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t14, t16, t17, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t24, t26, t31,...294
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,0.153921,9088,1,0,206,26912,218,91,1974,23252,251
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2024-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 57/57 places, 107/107 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 54 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 54 transition count 103
Applied a total of 6 rules in 5 ms. Remains 54 /57 variables (removed 3) and now considering 103/107 (removed 4) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 95 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 95 rows 54 cols
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 95 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned [53]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 95 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 53/57 places, 103/107 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 51 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 51 transition count 101
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 50 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 50 transition count 100
Applied a total of 6 rules in 2 ms. Remains 50 /53 variables (removed 3) and now considering 100/103 (removed 3) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 92 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 50 cols
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 22 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 92 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 44 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 66 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 50/57 places, 100/107 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 168 ms. Remains : 50/57 places, 100/107 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 100 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4232509097669984806.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8055062131802811469.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4232509097669984806.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8055062131802811469.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,973,0.018593,4064,2,420,5,2176,6,0,292,1461,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((((((AF(((p6==0)||(p43==1))) * EG(AG(((p21==0)||(p34==1))))) * ((p19==0)&&(p23==0))) + EF((p18==0))) * EF((p30==0))) * ((((p2==0)&&(p...330
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!((((((!(EG(!(((p6==0)||(p43==1))))) * EG(!(E(TRUE U !(((p21==0)||(p34==1))))))) * ((p19==0)&&(p23==...439
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t7, t9, t11, t12, t14, t15, t17, t19, t20, t22, t23, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29,...300
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,0.221762,13620,1,0,282,49385,240,155,2176,44641,345
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 57/57 places, 107/107 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 51 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 51 transition count 97
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 47 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 47 transition count 89
Applied a total of 20 rules in 7 ms. Remains 47 /57 variables (removed 10) and now considering 89/107 (removed 18) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 47 cols
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned [46]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 111 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 46/57 places, 89/107 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 40 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 40 transition count 83
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 36 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 36 transition count 79
Applied a total of 20 rules in 2 ms. Remains 36 /46 variables (removed 10) and now considering 79/89 (removed 10) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 74 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 36 cols
[2024-05-29 18:22:02] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 23 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 74 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 77 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 36/57 places, 79/107 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 197 ms. Remains : 36/57 places, 79/107 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2820414215600439812.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6558022548687282658.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2820414215600439812.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6558022548687282658.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,826,0.016016,3960,2,334,5,1806,6,0,218,1339,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AG(AX(((p21==1)&&(p49==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!(((p21==1)&&(p49==1)))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t9, t11, t13, t14, t15, t16, t18, t19, t22, t24, t25, t26, t31, t32, ...283
(forward)formula 0,0,0.076517,6388,1,0,154,12436,180,51,1687,10679,175
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 57/57 places, 107/107 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 53 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 53 transition count 101
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 51 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 51 transition count 97
Applied a total of 12 rules in 4 ms. Remains 51 /57 variables (removed 6) and now considering 97/107 (removed 10) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 51 cols
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned [50]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 101 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 50/57 places, 97/107 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 47 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 47 transition count 94
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 46 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 46 transition count 93
Applied a total of 8 rules in 3 ms. Remains 46 /50 variables (removed 4) and now considering 93/97 (removed 4) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 46 cols
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 50 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 80 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 46/57 places, 93/107 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 188 ms. Remains : 46/57 places, 93/107 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality45942842213002934.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4454920748800366267.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality45942842213002934.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4454920748800366267.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...281
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,963,0.01965,4036,2,409,5,2106,6,0,270,1586,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((EX(((p10==0)&&(p31==1))) + AG(((p55==0)||(p1==1)))) + ((AX(((p2==0)||(p32==1))) * AG(((p37==0)||(p32==1)))) * ((p19==0)&&(p11==1))))...156
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((EX(((p10==0)&&(p31==1))) + !(E(TRUE U !(((p55==0)||(p1==1))))))))) * !(((p2==0)||(p...442
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t14, t16, t17, t19, t21, t22, t24, t25, t27, t32, t35,...289
(forward)formula 0,0,0.077591,6992,1,0,162,15601,203,70,1914,12090,194
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 57/57 places, 107/107 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 51 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 51 transition count 97
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 48 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 48 transition count 91
Applied a total of 18 rules in 2 ms. Remains 48 /57 variables (removed 9) and now considering 91/107 (removed 16) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 48 cols
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 60 ms returned [47]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 91 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 47/57 places, 91/107 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 40 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 40 transition count 84
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 36 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 36 transition count 80
Applied a total of 22 rules in 1 ms. Remains 36 /47 variables (removed 11) and now considering 80/91 (removed 11) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 75 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 75 rows 36 cols
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 25 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 75 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 44 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 70 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 36/57 places, 80/107 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 164 ms. Remains : 36/57 places, 80/107 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13102777446254104968.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5726236360632184412.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13102777446254104968.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5726236360632184412.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,842,0.015133,3968,2,288,5,1650,6,0,219,1198,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(AX(EX((p6==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(EX(!(EX((p6==1))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t11, t13, t14, t16, t17, t18, t20, t21, t23, t24, t27, t32, t33, t35,...279
(forward)formula 0,0,0.053931,5868,1,0,151,12433,170,57,1621,9677,169
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2024-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 57/57 places, 107/107 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 52 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 52 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 51 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 51 transition count 97
Applied a total of 12 rules in 5 ms. Remains 51 /57 variables (removed 6) and now considering 97/107 (removed 10) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 91 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 91 rows 51 cols
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 91 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned [50]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 98 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 50/57 places, 97/107 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 48 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 48 transition count 95
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 46 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 46 transition count 93
Applied a total of 8 rules in 2 ms. Remains 46 /50 variables (removed 4) and now considering 93/97 (removed 4) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 87 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 87 rows 46 cols
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 24 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 87 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 72 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 46/57 places, 93/107 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 177 ms. Remains : 46/57 places, 93/107 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14641620957601701907.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3355844532370335836.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14641620957601701907.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3355844532370335836.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,962,0.020516,4036,2,443,5,2062,6,0,271,1724,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((AG((AF(((p20==0)&&(p48==1))) + AX(((p27==0)&&(p17==1))))) * (p53==0)) * ((p1==1) + ((AF((p24==1)) * ((p3==0)||((p45==0)&&(p41==1))))...182
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (!(E(TRUE U !((!(EG(!(((p20==0)&&(p48==1))))) + !(EX(!(((p27==0)&&(p17==1))))))))) * (p53=...394
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t20, t22, t23, t25, ...303
(forward)formula 0,0,0.114108,9104,1,0,200,25081,219,78,1981,22490,232
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2024-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 57/57 places, 107/107 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 53 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 53 transition count 100
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 51 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 51 transition count 96
Applied a total of 12 rules in 5 ms. Remains 51 /57 variables (removed 6) and now considering 96/107 (removed 11) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 51 cols
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 89 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 49 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 77 ms returned [50]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 118 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 50/57 places, 96/107 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 44 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 44 transition count 90
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 42 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 42 transition count 88
Applied a total of 16 rules in 1 ms. Remains 42 /50 variables (removed 8) and now considering 88/96 (removed 8) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 81 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 42 cols
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 81 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 48 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 84 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 42/57 places, 88/107 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 209 ms. Remains : 42/57 places, 88/107 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 88 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5864367500712185661.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9264380587340815150.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5864367500712185661.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9264380587340815150.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,940,0.017218,4008,2,389,5,2017,6,0,247,1420,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(EX((p14==1))) * EG((AG((p33==0)) + ((((p20==1)||(p40==0))||(p38==1)) * EG((p22==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(EX((p14==1))))] = FALSE * [(Init * !(EG((!(E(TRUE U !((p33==0)))) + ((((p20==1)||(p40==0))||(p38...190
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t11, t12, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t21, t23, t24, t26, t29, t34, t35,...284
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,0.126782,9604,1,0,227,31583,204,103,1917,26151,276
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 57/57 places, 107/107 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 55 transition count 96
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 45 transition count 95
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 44 transition count 95
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 44 transition count 90
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 39 transition count 90
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 33 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 33 transition count 80
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 30 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 30 transition count 74
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 30 transition count 71
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 22 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 22 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 30 transition count 49
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 30 transition count 48
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 29 transition count 48
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 26 transition count 45
Reduce places removed 3 places and 3 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 23 transition count 42
Applied a total of 87 rules in 27 ms. Remains 23 /57 variables (removed 34) and now considering 42/107 (removed 65) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 38 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 38 rows 23 cols
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 21 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 38 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 29 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 51 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 41 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 38 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/23 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 20 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 14/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 37/60 variables, 23/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 7/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/61 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/61 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 61/61 variables, and 46 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved in 871 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/23 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 2/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 37/60 variables, 23/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 7/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 41/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/61 variables, 1/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/61 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 61/61 variables, and 87 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved in 592 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 23/23 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints]
After SMT, in 1474ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1475ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 23/57 places, 42/107 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1557 ms. Remains : 23/57 places, 42/107 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15764959340543699313.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1659527766763224502.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15764959340543699313.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1659527766763224502.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,77,0.012568,3632,2,93,5,509,6,0,129,312,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E((AG((p55!=0)) * ((!(EF((p9==1))) + (p48==0)) + (p32==1))) U EG(EF(((p45==0)||(p54==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E((!(E(TRUE U !((p55!=0)))) * ((!(E(TRUE U (p9==1))) + (p48==0)) + (p32==1))) U EG(E(TRUE ...191
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t12, t16, t19, t27, t31, t39, Intersection with reac...230
(forward)formula 0,1,0.031438,4476,1,0,103,4381,111,48,891,4180,137
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 57/57 places, 107/107 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 14 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 14 transitions
Performed 14 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 14
Iterating post reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 55 transition count 92
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 41 transition count 91
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 40 transition count 91
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 40 transition count 83
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 32 transition count 83
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 26 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 26 transition count 73
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 22 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 22 transition count 65
Ensure Unique test removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 22 transition count 50
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 16 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 16 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 22 transition count 34
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 18 transition count 30
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 18 transition count 30
Reduce places removed 4 places and 4 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 14 transition count 26
Applied a total of 111 rules in 29 ms. Remains 14 /57 variables (removed 43) and now considering 26/107 (removed 81) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 22 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 22 rows 14 cols
[2024-05-29 18:22:06] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 23 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:22:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 22 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:22:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:22:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:22:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 22 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 47 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 18:22:06] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 17 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 22 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:22:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:22:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 4/14 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 9/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 14 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 4/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 21/35 variables, 14/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/36 variables, 1/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/36 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 36/36 variables, and 30 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved in 455 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 14/14 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 4/14 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 14/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 21/35 variables, 14/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 17/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/36 variables, 1/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/36 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 36/36 variables, and 47 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved in 153 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 14/14 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints]
After SMT, in 613ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 17 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 613ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 14/57 places, 26/107 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 694 ms. Remains : 14/57 places, 26/107 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 26 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:22:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2258431779654157544.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16385587612215001791.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2258431779654157544.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16385587612215001791.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25,0.004841,3496,2,55,5,323,6,0,78,223,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG((p38==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !((p38==1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t10, t20, Intersection with reachable at each step enabl...206
(forward)formula 0,0,0.012006,3812,1,0,55,1204,73,24,581,1121,65
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-04a-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2024-05-29 18:22:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:22:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Total runtime 14363 ms.

BK_STOP 1717006926890

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="StigmergyElection-PT-04a"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is StigmergyElection-PT-04a, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r400-tall-171690532000281"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/StigmergyElection-PT-04a.tgz
mv StigmergyElection-PT-04a execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;