Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r400-tall-171690531900265.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is StigmergyElection-PT-03a, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r400-tall-171690531900265
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 512K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.1K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 93K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.6K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 52K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.4K Apr 23 07:59 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K Apr 23 07:59 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K Apr 23 07:59 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 23 07:59 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K Apr 11 18:38 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 130K Apr 11 18:38 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.3K Apr 11 18:37 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 84K Apr 11 18:37 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Apr 23 07:59 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 23 07:59 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 31K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1717006658256

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=StigmergyElection-PT-03a
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-29 18:17:39] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-29 18:17:39] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-29 18:17:39] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 56 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:39] [INFO ] Transformed 44 places.
[2024-05-29 18:17:39] [INFO ] Transformed 118 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:39] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-29 18:17:39] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 44 places and 118 transitions and 467 arcs in 155 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 18 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
Ensure Unique test removed 45 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 45 transitions.
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 44 out of 44 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 73/73 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 73/73 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 64 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 44 cols
[2024-05-29 18:17:39] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 11 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 176 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:17:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 64 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:17:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:17:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 90 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 294 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 72 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 64 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:17:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 43/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/44 variables, 4/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 10/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 1/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:17:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 63/107 variables, 44/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 27/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/108 variables, 1/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/108 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 108/108 variables, and 132 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved in 2187 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 44/44 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 44/44 constraints, ReadFeed: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 72/72 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 43/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/44 variables, 4/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 12/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 63/107 variables, 44/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 27/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 72/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/108 variables, 1/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/108 variables, 0/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 108/108 variables, and 204 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved in 1223 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 44/44 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 44/44 constraints, ReadFeed: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 72/72 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints]
After SMT, in 3481ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3499ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3827 ms. Remains : 44/44 places, 73/73 transitions.
Support contains 44 out of 44 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:43] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2024-05-29 18:17:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-29 18:17:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 73 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 67 to 60
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (555 resets) in 1594 ms. (25 steps per ms) remains 6/60 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (167 resets) in 241 ms. (165 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 194 ms. (205 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (162 resets) in 111 ms. (357 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 70 ms. (563 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (72 resets) in 78 ms. (506 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (71 resets) in 121 ms. (327 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
[2024-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 64 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
Problem AtomicPropp20 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 26/43 variables, 3/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 26/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 5 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp2 is UNSAT
[2024-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp18 is UNSAT
[2024-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp24 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp48 is UNSAT
[2024-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp54 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 43/108 variables, and 53 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 6 solved, 0 unsolved in 245 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 43/44 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/4 constraints, State Equation: 0/44 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 251ms problems are : Problem set: 6 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 6 atomic propositions for a total of 13 simplifications.
[2024-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 73 transitions.
Computed a total of 8 stabilizing places and 7 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 73/73 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 39 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 39 transition count 65
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 37 transition count 61
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 37 transition count 61
Applied a total of 14 rules in 7 ms. Remains 37 /44 variables (removed 7) and now considering 61/73 (removed 12) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 57 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 57 rows 37 cols
[2024-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 57 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned [36]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 97 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 36/44 places, 61/73 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 31 transition count 56
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 31 transition count 56
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 28 transition count 53
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 28 transition count 53
Applied a total of 16 rules in 2 ms. Remains 28 /36 variables (removed 8) and now considering 53/61 (removed 8) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 49 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 49 rows 28 cols
[2024-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 21 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 49 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 16 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 37 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 59 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 28/44 places, 53/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 165 ms. Remains : 28/44 places, 53/73 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 53 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14088775067447827749.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3552247493543294913.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14088775067447827749.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3552247493543294913.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,190,0.016584,3512,2,176,5,877,6,0,161,613,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EG(EX(AF((p39!=0)))) * ((p34==0)||(p4==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((EG(EX(!(EG(!((p39!=0)))))) * ((p34==0)||(p4==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t5, t6, t8, t10, t11, t13, t15, t16, t20, t21, t25, t26, t28, t47, t49, t51, Int...249
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,0.044275,4692,1,0,126,5896,135,62,1054,5811,145
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 73/73 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 39 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 39 transition count 65
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 37 transition count 61
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 37 transition count 61
Applied a total of 14 rules in 2 ms. Remains 37 /44 variables (removed 7) and now considering 61/73 (removed 12) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 57 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 57 rows 37 cols
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 57 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned [36]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 94 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 36/44 places, 61/73 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 32 transition count 57
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 32 transition count 57
Applied a total of 8 rules in 1 ms. Remains 32 /36 variables (removed 4) and now considering 57/61 (removed 4) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 53 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 53 rows 32 cols
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 53 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 16 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 32 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 60 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 32/44 places, 57/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 158 ms. Remains : 32/44 places, 57/73 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 57 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15991929226083668027.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4765963833072913384.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15991929226083668027.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4765963833072913384.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,194,0.008691,3696,2,194,5,856,6,0,181,593,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((E(((p30==0)||(p32==1)) U ((p14==0)||(p38==1))) + EG((p27==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(EG((p27==1)))) * !(E(((p30==0)||(p32==1)) U ((p14==0)||(p38==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t5, t6, t8, t10, t11, t13, t15, t16, t20, t21, t22, t23, t24, t51, t53, t55, Int...249
(forward)formula 0,1,0.028452,4804,1,0,112,6271,129,47,1093,5130,125
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 73/73 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 42 transition count 60
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 30 transition count 60
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 30 transition count 55
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 25 transition count 55
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 21 transition count 48
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 21 transition count 48
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 18 transition count 42
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 18 transition count 42
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 18 transition count 39
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 12 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 12 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 18 transition count 27
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 15 transition count 24
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 15 transition count 24
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 15 transition count 23
Reduce places removed 3 places and 3 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 12 transition count 20
Applied a total of 75 rules in 21 ms. Remains 12 /44 variables (removed 32) and now considering 20/73 (removed 53) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 16 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 16 rows 12 cols
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 20 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 16 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 24 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 48 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 14 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 16 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 3/12 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 14 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 15/27 variables, 12/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/28 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/28 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 28/28 variables, and 22 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved in 245 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 12/12 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 3/12 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 15/27 variables, 12/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 14/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/28 variables, 1/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/28 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/28 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 28/28 variables, and 36 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved in 107 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 12/12 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 356ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 356ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 12/44 places, 20/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 431 ms. Remains : 12/44 places, 20/73 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 20 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality378660968664983799.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7345254975520186929.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality378660968664983799.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7345254975520186929.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,18,0.003099,3416,2,42,5,208,6,0,62,149,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(((p7==0)&&(p22==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),((p7==0)&&(p22==1)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 16/4/4
(forward)formula 0,1,0.005213,3732,1,0,7,516,19,1,338,310,8
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 73/73 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 40 transition count 67
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 40 transition count 67
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 39 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 39 transition count 65
Applied a total of 10 rules in 2 ms. Remains 39 /44 variables (removed 5) and now considering 65/73 (removed 8) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 39 cols
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 53 ms returned [38]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 85 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 38/44 places, 65/73 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 36 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 36 transition count 63
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 35 transition count 62
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 35 transition count 62
Applied a total of 6 rules in 1 ms. Remains 35 /38 variables (removed 3) and now considering 62/65 (removed 3) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 57 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 57 rows 35 cols
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 21 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 57 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 16 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 45 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 70 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 35/44 places, 62/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 158 ms. Remains : 35/44 places, 62/73 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 62 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10435838381638397292.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14770156535507205078.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10435838381638397292.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14770156535507205078.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,219,0.011924,3724,2,261,5,1250,6,0,197,976,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((!(A(!(EX((p4==0))) U !(((AG((p28==0)) + (p34==0)) + (p5==1))))) * ((AX((p5==0)) + (p25==1)) + EG(E(((p21==0)||(p18==1)) U AX((p9==1))...160
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(!(((!(E(TRUE U !((p28==0)))) + (p34==0)) + (p5==1))))))) * !(E(!(!(((!(E(TRUE U !((p28==0)...387
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t10, t11, t12, t13, t15, t16, t18, t19, t25, t28, t30, t31, t55, ...263
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,0.079557,7208,1,0,190,20106,161,93,1283,18476,233
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 73/73 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 39 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 39 transition count 65
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 36 transition count 59
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 36 transition count 59
Applied a total of 16 rules in 5 ms. Remains 36 /44 variables (removed 8) and now considering 59/73 (removed 14) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 55 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 55 rows 36 cols
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 55 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:17:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 56 ms returned [35]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 84 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 35/44 places, 59/73 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 31 transition count 55
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 31 transition count 55
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 29 transition count 53
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 29 transition count 53
Applied a total of 12 rules in 1 ms. Remains 29 /35 variables (removed 6) and now considering 53/59 (removed 6) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 49 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 49 rows 29 cols
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 20 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 49 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 16 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 48 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 70 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 29/44 places, 53/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 160 ms. Remains : 29/44 places, 53/73 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 53 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3606108293873243495.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3907439760860788156.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3606108293873243495.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3907439760860788156.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,176,0.008148,3676,2,160,5,839,6,0,165,567,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(((p23==0)&&(p35==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(((p23==0)&&(p35==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t11, t13, t14, t17, t18, t19, t22, t24, t25, t47, t49, t51, Intersec...244
(forward)formula 0,0,0.021917,4256,1,0,100,4323,117,41,1009,3089,108
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 73/73 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 39 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 39 transition count 65
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 37 transition count 61
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 37 transition count 61
Applied a total of 14 rules in 2 ms. Remains 37 /44 variables (removed 7) and now considering 61/73 (removed 12) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 57 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 57 rows 37 cols
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 24 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 57 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 52 ms returned [36]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 77 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 36/44 places, 61/73 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 32 transition count 57
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 32 transition count 57
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 29 transition count 54
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 29 transition count 54
Applied a total of 14 rules in 2 ms. Remains 29 /36 variables (removed 7) and now considering 54/61 (removed 7) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 50 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 50 rows 29 cols
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 24 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 50 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 16 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 72 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 29/44 places, 54/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 153 ms. Remains : 29/44 places, 54/73 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 54 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3720298096409874269.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16470674900654948115.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3720298096409874269.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16470674900654948115.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,198,0.009692,3676,2,216,5,1030,6,0,166,805,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AF((AF((p20==0)) * (p7==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),!((!(EG(!((p20==0)))) * (p7==0))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t26, t27, t29, t48, t50, ...258
(forward)formula 0,1,0.032285,4784,1,0,126,6662,131,47,1047,5181,129
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 73/73 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 40 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 40 transition count 66
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 37 transition count 60
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 37 transition count 60
Applied a total of 14 rules in 4 ms. Remains 37 /44 variables (removed 7) and now considering 60/73 (removed 13) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 55 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 55 rows 37 cols
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 55 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 48 ms returned [36]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 81 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 36/44 places, 60/73 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 32 transition count 56
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 32 transition count 56
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 30 transition count 54
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 30 transition count 54
Applied a total of 12 rules in 1 ms. Remains 30 /36 variables (removed 6) and now considering 54/60 (removed 6) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 49 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 49 rows 30 cols
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 25 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 49 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 16 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 37 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 64 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 30/44 places, 54/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 150 ms. Remains : 30/44 places, 54/73 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 54 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality411210708253677643.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8829812483060484293.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality411210708253677643.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8829812483060484293.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,176,0.008552,3680,2,160,5,771,6,0,167,492,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AG(EX((p37==0))) * EG(EF(((p21==0)||(p22==1))))) * EX(TRUE))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX((p37==0))))] = FALSE * [(Init * !(EG(E(TRUE U ((p21==0)||(p22==1))))))] = FALSE) * [(...184
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t8, t9, t11, t13, t14, t16, t17, t18, t21, t26, t28, t48, t50, t52, Intersection...240
(forward)formula 0,0,0.028754,4788,1,0,109,5193,127,47,1082,4774,132
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 73/73 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 41 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 41 transition count 69
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 40 transition count 67
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 40 transition count 67
Applied a total of 8 rules in 4 ms. Remains 40 /44 variables (removed 4) and now considering 67/73 (removed 6) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 61 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 40 cols
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 61 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 56 ms returned [39]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 88 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 39/44 places, 67/73 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 37 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 37 transition count 65
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 36 transition count 64
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 36 transition count 64
Applied a total of 6 rules in 3 ms. Remains 36 /39 variables (removed 3) and now considering 64/67 (removed 3) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 58 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 58 rows 36 cols
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 25 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 58 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 16 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 41 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 69 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 36/44 places, 64/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 164 ms. Remains : 36/44 places, 64/73 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 64 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15671602709245249831.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1137486384191565302.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15671602709245249831.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1137486384191565302.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,222,0.009965,3732,2,241,5,1047,6,0,202,809,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG((AF((p19==1)) + EF((p23==1)))) * (!(E((p40==1) U !(EF(((p26==1)&&((p26==0)||(p13==1))))))) + AG(AX(AX((p5==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (p23==1)))),!((p19==1)))] = FALSE * [(EY(EY(FwdU((Init * !(!(E((p40==1) U !...235
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t11, t12, t14, t16, t17, t19, t20, t22, t28, t30, t32, t56, t58, t61,...254
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 61/0/3
(forward)formula 0,0,0.051312,5896,1,0,152,11734,160,76,1344,10909,195
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 73/73 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 42 transition count 60
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 30 transition count 60
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 30 transition count 54
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 24 transition count 54
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 20 transition count 47
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 20 transition count 47
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 17 transition count 41
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 17 transition count 41
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 17 transition count 34
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 10 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 10 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 17 transition count 24
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 14 transition count 21
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 14 transition count 21
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 14 transition count 20
Reduce places removed 3 places and 3 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 11 transition count 17
Applied a total of 79 rules in 9 ms. Remains 11 /44 variables (removed 33) and now considering 17/73 (removed 56) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 13 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 13 rows 11 cols
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 17 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 13 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 26 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 44 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 13 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 13 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 3/11 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 12/23 variables, 11/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/24 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/24 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 24/24 variables, and 21 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved in 274 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 11/11 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 3/11 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 12/23 variables, 11/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 13/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/24 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/24 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 24/24 variables, and 34 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved in 90 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 11/11 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 367ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 13 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 367ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 11/44 places, 17/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 429 ms. Remains : 11/44 places, 17/73 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 17 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 79 steps (5 resets) in 6 ms. (11 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality11047004157676937337.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality277354061575494533.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality11047004157676937337.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality277354061575494533.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 73/73 transitions.
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 44 transition count 70
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 41 transition count 70
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 38 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 38 transition count 66
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 37 transition count 64
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 37 transition count 64
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 35 transition count 62
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 34 transition count 61
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 34 transition count 61
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 34 transition count 58
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 34 transition count 57
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 33 transition count 57
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 31 transition count 55
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 3 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 31 transition count 55
Applied a total of 32 rules in 12 ms. Remains 31 /44 variables (removed 13) and now considering 55/73 (removed 18) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 49 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 49 rows 31 cols
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 49 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 30 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 53 ms returned [30]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 81 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 30/44 places, 55/73 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 27 transition count 52
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 9 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 9 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 27 transition count 43
Applied a total of 15 rules in 8 ms. Remains 27 /30 variables (removed 3) and now considering 43/55 (removed 12) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 38 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 38 rows 27 cols
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 20 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 38 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 9 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 30 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 51 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 27/44 places, 43/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 154 ms. Remains : 27/44 places, 43/73 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 43 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4213880338522523416.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10915934046364736777.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4213880338522523416.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10915934046364736777.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,90,0.007705,3568,2,161,5,667,6,0,145,481,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(AG(((p38==0)||(p35==1)))) * A(((p5==0)||(p17==1)) U !((((EF((p19==1)) * AG(((p31==0)||(p27==1)))) + (p28==0)) + (p23==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((Init * E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((p38==0)||(p35==1))))))) * !(EG(!(!((((E(TRUE U (p19==1)) * !(E(TRUE U !(((p31...435
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t13, t25, t30, t32, t33, t34, t36, t41, Intersection with reacha...228
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,0.048086,5732,1,0,171,11996,117,120,954,11580,250
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 73/73 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 41 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 41 transition count 69
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 40 transition count 67
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 40 transition count 67
Applied a total of 8 rules in 2 ms. Remains 40 /44 variables (removed 4) and now considering 67/73 (removed 6) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 61 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 40 cols
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 61 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 44 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 74 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 66 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 61 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/40 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 14/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 1/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 60/100 variables, 40/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 27/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/101 variables, 1/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/101 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 101/101 variables, and 86 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved in 1800 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 40/40 constraints, ReadFeed: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 66/66 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/40 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 16/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 1/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 60/100 variables, 40/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 27/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 66/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/101 variables, 1/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/101 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 101/101 variables, and 154 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved in 1308 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 40/40 constraints, ReadFeed: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 66/66 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints]
After SMT, in 3127ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3128ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 40/44 places, 67/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3204 ms. Remains : 40/44 places, 67/73 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 67 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality411682862751290450.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8508180833939080753.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality411682862751290450.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8508180833939080753.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,225,0.013714,3796,2,341,5,1392,6,0,219,1029,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((AG((EF((p41==1)) * ((p19==1)||(p32==0)))) + ((!(E((p15==1) U (((p18==0)||(p10==1))&&(p14==1)))) * ((p41==0) + ((EG((p21==0)) * (p25==0...322
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(!(E(TRUE U !((E(TRUE U (p41==1)) * ((p19==1)||(p32==0)))))) + ((!(E((p15==1) U (((p18==0)||(p10==1)...404
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t9, t11, t12, t14, t16, t17, t19, t20, t23, t29, t30, t32, t59, t61, ...258
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,0.075643,7016,1,0,156,15042,172,81,1470,13191,210
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 73/73 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 42 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 42 transition count 69
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 41 transition count 67
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 41 transition count 67
Applied a total of 6 rules in 2 ms. Remains 41 /44 variables (removed 3) and now considering 67/73 (removed 6) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 41 cols
[2024-05-29 18:17:50] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned [40]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 41 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 40/44 places, 67/73 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 38 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 38 transition count 65
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 37 transition count 64
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 37 transition count 64
Applied a total of 6 rules in 1 ms. Remains 37 /40 variables (removed 3) and now considering 64/67 (removed 3) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 57 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 57 rows 37 cols
[2024-05-29 18:17:50] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 20 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:17:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 57 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:17:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 16 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:17:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 35 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 57 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 37/44 places, 64/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 101 ms. Remains : 37/44 places, 64/73 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 64 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6181938301745616733.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13665764305437606006.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6181938301745616733.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13665764305437606006.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,219,0.009727,3732,2,238,5,1065,6,0,201,768,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((((p37==1) + A(EG((p36!=1)) U ((((p3==1)||(p7==0))||(p22==1)) * !(EX((p29==1)))))) + !(E(((!((p8==0)||(p28==1)))&&(((p35==0)||(p16==1)...199
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p37==1))] != FALSE + [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!(((((p3==1)||(p7==0))||(p22==1)) * !(EX((...445
(forward)formula 0,1,0.010201,4048,1,0,6,1065,8,1,204,768,1
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 44/44 places, 73/73 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 40 transition count 67
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 40 transition count 67
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 39 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 39 transition count 65
Applied a total of 10 rules in 2 ms. Remains 39 /44 variables (removed 5) and now considering 65/73 (removed 8) transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 39 cols
[2024-05-29 18:17:50] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 20 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 18:17:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:17:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 18:17:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 41 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 63 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 64 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2024-05-29 18:17:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 18:17:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 28 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/39 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 18:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 13/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 1/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 59/98 variables, 39/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 27/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/99 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/99 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 99/99 variables, and 84 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved in 1700 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 39/39 constraints, ReadFeed: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/39 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 15/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
[2024-05-29 18:17:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 59/98 variables, 39/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 27/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 64/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/99 variables, 1/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/99 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 99/99 variables, and 149 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved in 1230 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 39/39 constraints, ReadFeed: 28/28 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints]
After SMT, in 2953ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2954ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 39/44 places, 65/73 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3020 ms. Remains : 39/44 places, 65/73 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 65 transitions.
[2024-05-29 18:17:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6454976250630293800.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5065850498914282890.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6454976250630293800.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5065850498914282890.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,222,0.017896,3800,2,286,5,1433,6,0,214,1013,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(EG(A(!(((p29==0)||(p31==1))) U A((p42==1) U ((p21==0)||(p10==1)))))) * A(A((AF((p12==0)) + ((EF((p7==1)) + (p39!=1)) * AF(((p6==0)||(...277
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(EG(!((E(!(!((E(!(((p21==0)||(p10==1))) U (!((p42==1)) * !(((p21==0)||(p10==1))))) + EG(!(((p21==...966
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t7, t9, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t25, t28, t29, t31, t58,...264
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,0.10333,7548,1,0,178,19363,199,96,1448,17897,235
FORMULA StigmergyElection-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2024-05-29 18:17:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 18:17:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Total runtime 14713 ms.

BK_STOP 1717006674137

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="StigmergyElection-PT-03a"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is StigmergyElection-PT-03a, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r400-tall-171690531900265"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/StigmergyElection-PT-03a.tgz
mv StigmergyElection-PT-03a execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;