Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r400-tall-171690531600105.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is StigmergyCommit-PT-03a, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r400-tall-171690531600105
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 540K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.7K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 86K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.3K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 76K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Apr 23 07:58 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K Apr 23 07:58 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K Apr 23 07:58 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K Apr 23 07:58 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.2K Apr 11 17:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 98K Apr 11 17:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.7K Apr 11 17:46 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 65K Apr 11 17:46 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K Apr 23 07:58 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K Apr 23 07:58 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 98K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716984542132

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=StigmergyCommit-PT-03a
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-29 12:09:03] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-29 12:09:03] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-29 12:09:03] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 78 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:03] [INFO ] Transformed 148 places.
[2024-05-29 12:09:03] [INFO ] Transformed 332 transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:03] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-29 12:09:03] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 148 places and 332 transitions and 1538 arcs in 174 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 15 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 110 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 110 transitions.
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 90 out of 148 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 148/148 places, 222/222 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 138 transition count 211
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 138 transition count 211
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 138 transition count 210
Applied a total of 21 rules in 26 ms. Remains 138 /148 variables (removed 10) and now considering 210/222 (removed 12) transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 199 transitions (discarded 11 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 199 rows 138 cols
[2024-05-29 12:09:03] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 14 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 218 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 12:09:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 199 transitions (discarded 11 similar events)
[2024-05-29 12:09:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 12:09:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 85 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 12:09:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 180 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 425 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 209 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 199 transitions (discarded 11 similar events)
[2024-05-29 12:09:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 12:09:04] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 85 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/138 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
[2024-05-29 12:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 95 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 20/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
[2024-05-29 12:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 5/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 198/336 variables, 138/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 84/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
[2024-05-29 12:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/337 variables, 1/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/337 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 337/337 variables, and 254 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved in 13466 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 138/138 constraints, ReadFeed: 85/85 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 209/209 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/138 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 26/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
[2024-05-29 12:09:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 198/336 variables, 138/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 84/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 209/463 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 0/463 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/337 variables, 1/464 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 0/464 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/337 variables, 0/464 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 337/337 variables, and 464 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved in 8717 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 138/138 constraints, ReadFeed: 85/85 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 209/209 constraints, Known Traps: 27/27 constraints]
After SMT, in 22336ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 22349ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 138/148 places, 210/222 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 22823 ms. Remains : 138/148 places, 210/222 transitions.
Support contains 90 out of 138 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:26] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2024-05-29 12:09:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 38 ms
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-29 12:09:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 210 transitions.
Support contains 81 out of 138 places (down from 90) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (86 resets) in 1447 ms. (27 steps per ms) remains 4/62 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 220 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (12 resets) in 39 ms. (1000 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (14 resets) in 112 ms. (354 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (13 resets) in 89 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
[2024-05-29 12:09:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 199 transitions (discarded 11 similar events)
[2024-05-29 12:09:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 12:09:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 85 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 122/137 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/138 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 198/336 variables, 138/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 84/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 0/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/337 variables, 1/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/337 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 337/337 variables, and 228 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 292 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 138/138 constraints, ReadFeed: 85/85 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp59 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 122/137 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
[2024-05-29 12:09:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp28 is UNSAT
[2024-05-29 12:09:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp47 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp58 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 137/337 variables, and 9 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 0 unsolved in 314 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/138 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/85 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/4 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 616ms problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 4 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
[2024-05-29 12:09:28] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2024-05-29 12:09:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-29 12:09:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 210 transitions.
Computed a total of 28 stabilizing places and 27 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 210/210 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 114 transition count 182
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 114 transition count 182
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 114 transition count 181
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 104 transition count 170
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 104 transition count 170
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 104 transition count 166
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 100 transition count 162
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 100 transition count 162
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 85 place count 96 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 96 transition count 158
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 93 place count 92 transition count 154
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 92 transition count 154
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 92 transition count 153
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 89 transition count 150
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 89 transition count 150
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 89 transition count 147
Applied a total of 107 rules in 24 ms. Remains 89 /138 variables (removed 49) and now considering 147/210 (removed 63) transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:28] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 142 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 142 rows 89 cols
[2024-05-29 12:09:28] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 12:09:28] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 142 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2024-05-29 12:09:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 12:09:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 65 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 12:09:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 85 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 139 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 146 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:28] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 142 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2024-05-29 12:09:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 12:09:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 65 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/89 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
[2024-05-29 12:09:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 20/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
[2024-05-29 12:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 11/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 141/230 variables, 89/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 64/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
[2024-05-29 12:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/231 variables, 1/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/231 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 231/231 variables, and 188 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved in 7486 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 89/89 constraints, ReadFeed: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 146/146 constraints, Known Traps: 32/32 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/89 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 32/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 141/230 variables, 89/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 64/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 146/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/231 variables, 1/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 0/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/231 variables, 0/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 231/231 variables, and 334 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved in 5581 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 89/89 constraints, ReadFeed: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 146/146 constraints, Known Traps: 32/32 constraints]
After SMT, in 13115ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 13118ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 89/138 places, 147/210 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 13281 ms. Remains : 89/138 places, 147/210 transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 147 transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4483867136441015272.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality534633584316922477.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4483867136441015272.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality534633584316922477.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3970,0.135758,4860,2,792,5,4831,6,0,496,3678,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((EF((p143==1)) + !(A(A((p147==1) U ((p138==0)||(p36==1))) U EF(((p93==0)||(p136==1)))))) + AX(((AG((p120==1)) + (p11==1)) + ((p74==0)...171
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(((EY((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((E(TRUE U (p143==1)) + !(!((E(!(E(TRUE U ((p93==0)||(p136==1)))) U (!(!((E(!(((...415
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t15, t17, t18, t19, t20, t22, t23, t24, t...336
(forward)formula 0,0,0.407442,16992,1,0,257,48470,330,115,3391,45708,344
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 210/210 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 114 transition count 182
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 114 transition count 182
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 114 transition count 179
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 104 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 104 transition count 166
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 104 transition count 163
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 103 transition count 162
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 103 transition count 162
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 102 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 102 transition count 161
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 79 place count 101 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 101 transition count 160
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 101 transition count 159
Applied a total of 81 rules in 17 ms. Remains 101 /138 variables (removed 37) and now considering 159/210 (removed 51) transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 154 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 154 rows 101 cols
[2024-05-29 12:09:41] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 12:09:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 154 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2024-05-29 12:09:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 12:09:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 12:09:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 139 ms returned [100]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 185 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 100/138 places, 159/210 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 93 transition count 152
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 93 transition count 152
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 93 transition count 149
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 91 transition count 147
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 91 transition count 147
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 90 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 90 transition count 146
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 89 transition count 145
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 89 transition count 145
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 88 transition count 144
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 88 transition count 144
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 87 transition count 143
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 87 transition count 143
Applied a total of 29 rules in 12 ms. Remains 87 /100 variables (removed 13) and now considering 143/159 (removed 16) transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 138 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 138 rows 87 cols
[2024-05-29 12:09:42] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 12:09:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 138 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2024-05-29 12:09:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 12:09:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 12:09:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 99 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 87/138 places, 143/210 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 314 ms. Remains : 87/138 places, 143/210 transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 143 transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13380653922487998318.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16201717053994659939.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13380653922487998318.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16201717053994659939.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3818,0.026968,4296,2,509,5,2654,6,0,486,1964,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((AG(((p107==0)||(p48==1))) * A(((p31==0)&&(p88==1)) U AG(((p13==0)||(p104==1))))) * ((EX(((p43==0)||(p98==1))) + AG((((p142==0)||(p35...249
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((!(E(TRUE U !(((p107==0)||(p48==1))))) * !((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p13==0)||(p104==1)))))) U (!(((p31=...433
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t11, t13, t14, t16, t18, t19, t21, t23, t24, t25, t28, t31, t37, t44,...321
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,0.413255,20164,1,0,357,78504,329,215,3287,80922,478
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 210/210 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 112 transition count 180
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 112 transition count 180
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 112 transition count 177
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 100 transition count 162
Iterating global reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 100 transition count 162
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 100 transition count 158
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 86 place count 97 transition count 155
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 97 transition count 155
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 92 place count 94 transition count 152
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 94 transition count 152
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 98 place count 91 transition count 149
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 91 transition count 149
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 104 place count 88 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 88 transition count 146
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 88 transition count 143
Applied a total of 110 rules in 10 ms. Remains 88 /138 variables (removed 50) and now considering 143/210 (removed 67) transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 138 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 138 rows 88 cols
[2024-05-29 12:09:42] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 12:09:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 138 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2024-05-29 12:09:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 12:09:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 68 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 12:09:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 119 ms returned [87]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 175 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 87/138 places, 143/210 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 76 transition count 132
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 76 transition count 132
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 76 transition count 128
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 72 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 72 transition count 124
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 68 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 68 transition count 120
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 64 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 64 transition count 116
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 61 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 61 transition count 113
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 59 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 59 transition count 111
Applied a total of 60 rules in 6 ms. Remains 59 /87 variables (removed 28) and now considering 111/143 (removed 32) transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 106 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 106 rows 59 cols
[2024-05-29 12:09:42] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 23 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 12:09:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 106 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2024-05-29 12:09:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 12:09:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 12:09:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 71 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 59/138 places, 111/210 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 263 ms. Remains : 59/138 places, 111/210 transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 111 transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6595294247326999720.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17865993609868688679.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6595294247326999720.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17865993609868688679.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3727,0.019574,4124,2,343,5,1807,6,0,342,1347,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EX(EF((EG((p23==1)) * (EF((p4==1)) + (p19==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,EX(E(TRUE U (EG((p23==1)) * (E(TRUE U (p4==1)) + (p19==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t11, t13, t14, t16, t18, t19, t37, t42, t45, t46, t48, t51, t52, t54,...304
(forward)formula 0,0,0.144284,9456,1,0,202,26090,249,82,2352,23180,281
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 210/210 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 114 transition count 182
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 114 transition count 182
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 114 transition count 180
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 103 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 103 transition count 166
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 103 transition count 162
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 101 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 101 transition count 160
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 100 transition count 159
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 100 transition count 159
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 83 place count 99 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 99 transition count 158
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 85 place count 98 transition count 157
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 98 transition count 157
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 98 transition count 156
Applied a total of 87 rules in 11 ms. Remains 98 /138 variables (removed 40) and now considering 156/210 (removed 54) transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 151 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 151 rows 98 cols
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 151 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 71 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 133 ms returned [97]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 177 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 97/138 places, 156/210 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 87 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 87 transition count 146
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 87 transition count 142
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 84 transition count 139
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 84 transition count 139
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 81 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 81 transition count 136
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 78 transition count 133
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 78 transition count 133
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 75 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 75 transition count 130
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 72 transition count 127
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 72 transition count 127
Applied a total of 54 rules in 7 ms. Remains 72 /97 variables (removed 25) and now considering 127/156 (removed 29) transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 122 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 122 rows 72 cols
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 122 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 52 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 81 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 72/138 places, 127/210 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 276 ms. Remains : 72/138 places, 127/210 transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 127 transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12655223346462442363.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12437214793959412710.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12655223346462442363.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12437214793959412710.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3803,0.022668,4204,2,462,5,2368,6,0,410,1739,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((p93!=1)&&((p139==0)||(p26==1))) U !(EF(AX((E((p51==1) U ((p56==0)||(p89==1))) * ((p137==0)||(p115==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,((p93!=1)&&((p139==0)||(p26==1)))) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(!((E((p51==1) U ((p56==0)||(p89==1))) * ((p137=...187
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t11, t13, t14, t16, t18, t19, t22, t23, t24, t25, t52, t57, t61, t64,...331
(forward)formula 0,0,0.126704,9008,1,0,196,22832,274,94,2660,18375,270
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 210/210 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 85 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 85 transitions
Performed 85 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 85
Iterating post reduction 0 with 86 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 136 transition count 124
Reduce places removed 85 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 18 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 18 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 106 rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 51 transition count 103
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 201 place count 48 transition count 97
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 204 place count 45 transition count 97
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 204 place count 45 transition count 87
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 224 place count 35 transition count 87
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 230 place count 29 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 29 transition count 78
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 29 transition count 77
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 239 place count 27 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 27 transition count 73
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 27 transition count 67
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 249 place count 26 transition count 66
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 26 transition count 65
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 17 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 17 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 267 place count 26 transition count 48
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 275 place count 22 transition count 44
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 277 place count 22 transition count 44
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 278 place count 22 transition count 43
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 280 place count 20 transition count 41
Applied a total of 280 rules in 30 ms. Remains 20 /138 variables (removed 118) and now considering 41/210 (removed 169) transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 36 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 36 rows 20 cols
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 22 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 36 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 14 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 27 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 50 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 39 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 36 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 14 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/20 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 13 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 14 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 14 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 14/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
[2024-05-29 12:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 2/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 35/55 variables, 20/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 13/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/56 variables, 1/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/56 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 56/56 variables, and 51 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved in 787 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 20/20 constraints, ReadFeed: 14/14 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/20 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 6/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
[2024-05-29 12:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 35/55 variables, 20/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 13/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 39/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/56 variables, 1/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/56 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 56/56 variables, and 91 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved in 617 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 20/20 constraints, ReadFeed: 14/14 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints]
After SMT, in 1416ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1417ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 20/138 places, 41/210 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1501 ms. Remains : 20/138 places, 41/210 transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 41 transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1395544641766993009.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14368844489656537297.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1395544641766993009.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14368844489656537297.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,49,0.006785,3640,2,87,5,522,6,0,114,353,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((AG(((p140==1) + EF(((p73==0)&&(p20==1))))) + (p32==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(E(TRUE U !(((p140==1) + E(TRUE U ((p73==0)&&(p20==1))))))) + (p32==1)))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t12, t22, t23, t26, t28, Intersection with reachable...225
(forward)formula 0,0,0.021812,4220,1,0,100,3252,105,48,871,3312,133
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 210/210 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 116 transition count 185
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 116 transition count 185
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 116 transition count 183
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 107 transition count 172
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 107 transition count 172
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 107 transition count 168
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 106 transition count 167
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 106 transition count 167
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 105 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 105 transition count 166
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 104 transition count 165
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 104 transition count 165
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 104 transition count 164
Applied a total of 75 rules in 9 ms. Remains 104 /138 variables (removed 34) and now considering 164/210 (removed 46) transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 158 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 158 rows 104 cols
[2024-05-29 12:09:45] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 12:09:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 158 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2024-05-29 12:09:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 12:09:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 73 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 12:09:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 115 ms returned [103]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 163 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 103/138 places, 164/210 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 95 transition count 156
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 95 transition count 156
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 95 transition count 153
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 93 transition count 151
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 93 transition count 151
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 91 transition count 149
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 91 transition count 149
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 90 transition count 148
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 90 transition count 148
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 89 transition count 147
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 89 transition count 147
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 88 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 88 transition count 146
Applied a total of 33 rules in 8 ms. Remains 88 /103 variables (removed 15) and now considering 146/164 (removed 18) transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 140 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 140 rows 88 cols
[2024-05-29 12:09:45] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 12:09:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 140 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2024-05-29 12:09:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 12:09:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 12:09:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 93 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 88/138 places, 146/210 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 273 ms. Remains : 88/138 places, 146/210 transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 146 transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15062967797040398320.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2621935687692988940.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15062967797040398320.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2621935687692988940.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3960,0.028753,4312,2,575,5,2936,6,0,492,2127,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((E(((EG(((p89==0)||(p140==1))) + (p70==0)) + (p113==1)) U AG(((p3==0)||(p53==1)))) + ((p142==0)&&(p51==1))) + (AX(((p123==0)||(p124==...233
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((E(((EG(((p89==0)||(p140==1))) + (p70==0)) + (p113==1)) U !(E(TRUE U !(((p3==0)||(p53==1)))))) + ((p...345
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t7, t9, t11, t12, t14, t16, t17, t19, t21, t22, t23, t26, t28, t29, t30, t44,...344
(forward)formula 0,1,0.645503,29828,1,0,444,153126,338,243,3326,127509,639
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 210/210 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 90 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 90 transitions
Performed 90 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 90
Iterating post reduction 0 with 91 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 136 transition count 119
Reduce places removed 90 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 18 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 18 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 111 rules applied. Total rules applied 202 place count 46 transition count 98
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 209 place count 43 transition count 94
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 210 place count 42 transition count 94
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 210 place count 42 transition count 86
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 226 place count 34 transition count 86
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 234 place count 26 transition count 74
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 26 transition count 74
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 26 transition count 73
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 246 place count 23 transition count 67
Iterating global reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 249 place count 23 transition count 67
Ensure Unique test removed 14 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 263 place count 23 transition count 53
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 265 place count 22 transition count 52
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 266 place count 22 transition count 51
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 16 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 16 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 282 place count 22 transition count 35
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 290 place count 18 transition count 31
Reduce places removed 3 places and 3 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 293 place count 15 transition count 28
Applied a total of 293 rules in 16 ms. Remains 15 /138 variables (removed 123) and now considering 28/210 (removed 182) transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 24 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 24 rows 15 cols
[2024-05-29 12:09:46] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 20 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 12:09:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 24 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-29 12:09:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 12:09:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 12:09:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 27 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 49 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-29 12:09:46] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 20 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 24 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2024-05-29 12:09:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 12:09:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 4/15 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
[2024-05-29 12:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2024-05-29 12:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 16/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 23/38 variables, 15/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/39 variables, 1/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/39 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 39/39 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved in 550 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 15/15 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 4/15 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 16/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 23/38 variables, 15/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 20/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/39 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/39 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 39/39 variables, and 53 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved in 178 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 15/15 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints]
After SMT, in 733ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 733ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 15/138 places, 28/210 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 805 ms. Remains : 15/138 places, 28/210 transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 28 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 431 steps (32 resets) in 6 ms. (61 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2024-05-29 12:09:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3703585694407240464.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3563667045211910499.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3703585694407240464.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3563667045211910499.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 210/210 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 113 transition count 181
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 113 transition count 181
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 113 transition count 178
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 102 transition count 164
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 102 transition count 164
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 102 transition count 161
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 99 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 99 transition count 158
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 86 place count 97 transition count 156
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 97 transition count 156
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 90 place count 95 transition count 154
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 95 transition count 154
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 94 place count 93 transition count 152
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 93 transition count 152
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 93 transition count 150
Applied a total of 98 rules in 5 ms. Remains 93 /138 variables (removed 45) and now considering 150/210 (removed 60) transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 145 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 145 rows 93 cols
[2024-05-29 12:09:46] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 145 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 71 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 130 ms returned [92]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 178 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 92/138 places, 150/210 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 82 transition count 140
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 82 transition count 140
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 82 transition count 136
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 78 transition count 132
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 78 transition count 132
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 75 transition count 129
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 75 transition count 129
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 72 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 72 transition count 126
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 69 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 69 transition count 123
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 67 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 67 transition count 121
Applied a total of 54 rules in 6 ms. Remains 67 /92 variables (removed 25) and now considering 121/150 (removed 29) transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 116 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 67 cols
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 116 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 52 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 83 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 67/138 places, 121/210 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 273 ms. Remains : 67/138 places, 121/210 transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 121 transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16558003366348589524.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17397623559421111286.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16558003366348589524.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17397623559421111286.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3798,0.028524,4172,2,418,5,2267,6,0,384,1713,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EF(((EF((p0==0)) + EX(((p133==0)||(p105==1)))) + EG(((p43==0)||(p121==1))))) + (p23==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((p23==1))) * !(E(TRUE U ((E(TRUE U (p0==0)) + EX(((p133==0)||(p105==1)))) + EG(((p43==0)|...180
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t11, t13, t14, t16, t18, t19, t21, t23, t24, t25, t31, t41, t47, t49,...335
(forward)formula 0,1,0.156745,10032,1,0,217,26972,265,89,2573,26390,287
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 210/210 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 138 transition count 200
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 128 transition count 197
Performed 28 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 28 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 128 transition count 169
Deduced a syphon composed of 28 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 28 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 100 transition count 169
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 98 place count 81 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 2 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 81 transition count 146
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 81 transition count 144
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 129 place count 71 transition count 133
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 71 transition count 133
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 71 transition count 130
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 147 place count 66 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 66 transition count 125
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 66 transition count 123
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 157 place count 63 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 63 transition count 120
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 63 transition count 117
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 60 transition count 114
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 171 place count 60 transition count 112
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 173 place count 58 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 58 transition count 110
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 177 place count 56 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 56 transition count 108
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 181 place count 54 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 183 place count 54 transition count 106
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 6 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 6 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 54 transition count 100
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 197 place count 50 transition count 96
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 7 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 7 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 204 place count 50 transition count 96
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 205 place count 50 transition count 95
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 206 place count 50 transition count 94
Applied a total of 206 rules in 43 ms. Remains 50 /138 variables (removed 88) and now considering 94/210 (removed 116) transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 88 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 88 rows 50 cols
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Computed 4 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 88 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 62 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned [49]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 103 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/138 places, 94/210 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 49 transition count 88
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 43 transition count 86
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 42 transition count 84
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 41 transition count 84
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 41 transition count 82
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 39 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 38 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 38 transition count 81
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 10
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 28 transition count 71
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 28 transition count 66
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 22 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 22 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 28 transition count 44
Applied a total of 71 rules in 13 ms. Remains 28 /49 variables (removed 21) and now considering 44/94 (removed 50) transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 38 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 38 rows 28 cols
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Computed 3 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 20 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 38 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 12 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 34 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 55 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 28/138 places, 44/210 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 215 ms. Remains : 28/138 places, 44/210 transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 44 transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality327776918633262200.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14002697298745997121.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality327776918633262200.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14002697298745997121.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,107,0.007509,3644,2,147,5,718,6,0,145,552,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((p44==1)) * (A((p30!=1) U E((p36==1) U AG(AF(((p4==0)||(p43==1)))))) + !(A(EF((p110!=1)) U ((AF((p142==1)) + EG((p2==0))) * ((p116==0...173
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!((p44==1)))] = FALSE * ([((FwdU((Init * !(!(!((E(!(((!(EG(!((p142==1)))) + EG((p2==0))) * ((p116==0...836
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t17, t22, t26, t28, t37, t43, Intersection with reachab...227
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,0.048643,5544,1,0,202,9899,136,115,1098,11547,251
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 210/210 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 112 transition count 180
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 112 transition count 180
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 112 transition count 177
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 100 transition count 162
Iterating global reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 100 transition count 162
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 100 transition count 159
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 86 place count 96 transition count 155
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 96 transition count 155
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 93 place count 93 transition count 152
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 93 transition count 152
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 99 place count 90 transition count 149
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 90 transition count 149
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 105 place count 87 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 87 transition count 146
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 87 transition count 143
Applied a total of 111 rules in 4 ms. Remains 87 /138 variables (removed 51) and now considering 143/210 (removed 67) transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 138 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 138 rows 87 cols
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 138 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 67 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 111 ms returned [86]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 153 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 86/138 places, 143/210 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 75 transition count 132
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 75 transition count 132
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 75 transition count 128
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 71 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 71 transition count 124
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 67 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 67 transition count 120
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 63 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 63 transition count 116
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 59 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 59 transition count 112
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 56 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 56 transition count 109
Applied a total of 64 rules in 3 ms. Remains 56 /86 variables (removed 30) and now considering 109/143 (removed 34) transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 104 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 56 cols
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 104 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 53 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 83 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 56/138 places, 109/210 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 243 ms. Remains : 56/138 places, 109/210 transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 109 transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11505321360113360002.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17429211697762621097.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11505321360113360002.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17429211697762621097.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3724,0.023838,4108,2,333,5,1801,6,0,328,1291,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(EX(((p9==0)&&(p26==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U EX(((p9==0)&&(p26==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t11, t13, t14, t16, t18, t19, t39, t42, t43, t45, t48, t49, t53, t54,...310
(forward)formula 0,1,0.218036,12608,1,0,282,39962,239,154,2309,43121,350
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2024-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 210/210 transitions.
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 115 transition count 184
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 115 transition count 184
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 115 transition count 181
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 106 transition count 169
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 106 transition count 169
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 106 transition count 166
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 71 place count 105 transition count 165
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 105 transition count 165
Applied a total of 72 rules in 6 ms. Remains 105 /138 variables (removed 33) and now considering 165/210 (removed 45) transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 160 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 160 rows 105 cols
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 5 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 160 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 78 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 131 ms returned [104]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 187 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/138 places, 165/210 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 94 transition count 155
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 94 transition count 155
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 94 transition count 152
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 91 transition count 149
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 91 transition count 149
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 88 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 88 transition count 146
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 85 transition count 143
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 85 transition count 143
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 82 transition count 140
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 82 transition count 140
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 80 transition count 138
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 80 transition count 138
Applied a total of 51 rules in 4 ms. Remains 80 /104 variables (removed 24) and now considering 138/165 (removed 27) transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 133 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 133 rows 80 cols
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 133 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 57 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 87 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 80/138 places, 138/210 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 284 ms. Remains : 80/138 places, 138/210 transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 138 transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3489355146401632145.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13878520458468674415.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3489355146401632145.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13878520458468674415.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3874,0.029918,4276,2,467,5,2496,6,0,453,1797,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(!(A(((((p63==1)&&(p131==0))||(p94==0))||((p68==1)||(p23==1))) U AF((p54==1))))) * AG((EX((p69==0)) + AF((((p10==0)&&(p38==1))||((p14=...175
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(!(EG(!((p54==1))))) U (!(((((p63==1)&&(p131==0))||(p94==0))||((p68==1)||(p23==1)))...329
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t11, t12, t13, t15, t16, t18, t20, t21, t23, t26, t27, t33, t35, t42,...346
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 129/6/9
(forward)formula 0,0,0.202364,11720,1,0,235,32302,297,101,3017,31437,309
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 210/210 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 112 transition count 180
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 112 transition count 180
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 112 transition count 177
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 67 place count 100 transition count 162
Iterating global reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 100 transition count 162
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 100 transition count 159
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 86 place count 96 transition count 155
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 96 transition count 155
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 94 place count 92 transition count 151
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 92 transition count 151
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 102 place count 88 transition count 147
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 88 transition count 147
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 88 transition count 146
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 110 place count 85 transition count 143
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 85 transition count 143
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 85 transition count 140
Applied a total of 116 rules in 10 ms. Remains 85 /138 variables (removed 53) and now considering 140/210 (removed 70) transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 135 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 135 rows 85 cols
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 135 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 66 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 94 ms returned [84]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 137 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 84/138 places, 140/210 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 73 transition count 129
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 73 transition count 129
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 73 transition count 125
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 69 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 69 transition count 121
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 65 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 65 transition count 117
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 62 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 62 transition count 114
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 59 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 59 transition count 111
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 56 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 56 transition count 108
Applied a total of 60 rules in 2 ms. Remains 56 /84 variables (removed 28) and now considering 108/140 (removed 32) transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 103 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 103 rows 56 cols
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 103 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 45 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 74 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 56/138 places, 108/210 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 223 ms. Remains : 56/138 places, 108/210 transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 108 transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3979948767865739793.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17188651451057833717.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3979948767865739793.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17188651451057833717.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3724,0.019359,4104,2,341,5,1815,6,0,327,1287,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EX(TRUE) U !(((p81==0)||(p143==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(((p81==0)||(p143==1))))))) * !(E(!(!(((p81==0)||(p143==1)))) U (!(EX(TRUE)) * !(!(((p81==0)||...181
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t9, t11, t13, t14, t16, t18, t19, t39, t40, t43, t46, t49, t50, t52, t55,...304
(forward)formula 0,0,0.110406,8380,1,0,194,20005,232,76,2169,19733,257
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 210/210 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 114 transition count 183
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 114 transition count 183
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 114 transition count 180
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 103 transition count 167
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 103 transition count 167
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 103 transition count 163
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 102 transition count 162
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 102 transition count 162
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 80 place count 101 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 101 transition count 161
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 82 place count 100 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 100 transition count 160
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 84 place count 99 transition count 159
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 99 transition count 159
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 99 transition count 158
Applied a total of 86 rules in 4 ms. Remains 99 /138 variables (removed 39) and now considering 158/210 (removed 52) transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 152 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 152 rows 99 cols
[2024-05-29 12:09:49] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 12:09:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 152 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2024-05-29 12:09:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 12:09:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 73 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 12:09:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 134 ms returned [98]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 177 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/138 places, 158/210 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 88 transition count 148
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 88 transition count 148
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 88 transition count 144
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 85 transition count 141
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 85 transition count 141
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 82 transition count 138
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 82 transition count 138
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 79 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 79 transition count 135
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 76 transition count 132
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 76 transition count 132
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 74 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 74 transition count 130
Applied a total of 52 rules in 4 ms. Remains 74 /98 variables (removed 24) and now considering 130/158 (removed 28) transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 124 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 124 rows 74 cols
[2024-05-29 12:09:49] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 12:09:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 124 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2024-05-29 12:09:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 12:09:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 12:09:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 49 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 79 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 2 : 74/138 places, 130/210 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 264 ms. Remains : 74/138 places, 130/210 transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 130 transitions.
[2024-05-29 12:09:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1698016401013138929.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12401184356011454885.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1698016401013138929.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12401184356011454885.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3931,0.031208,4248,2,452,5,2425,6,0,420,1653,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(EF(((EX((p90==0)) * (AX(((p59==0)||(p71==1))) + !(E((p89==1) U (p115==0))))) * ((p68==0)&&(p23==1))))) * AX((p113==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((EX((p90==0)) * (!(EX(!(((p59==0)||(p71==1))))) + !(E((p89==1) U (p115==0))))) ...229
(forward)formula 0,0,0.033741,4564,1,0,9,2425,9,2,557,1653,2
FORMULA StigmergyCommit-PT-03a-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2024-05-29 12:09:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-29 12:09:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Total runtime 46200 ms.

BK_STOP 1716984589504

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="StigmergyCommit-PT-03a"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is StigmergyCommit-PT-03a, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r400-tall-171690531600105"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/StigmergyCommit-PT-03a.tgz
mv StigmergyCommit-PT-03a execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLCardinality.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;