Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r378-smll-171683811300338.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is SmartHome-PT-01, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r378-smll-171683811300338
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 532K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.1K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 65K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 63K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Apr 23 07:57 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K Apr 23 07:57 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K Apr 23 07:57 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K Apr 23 07:57 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K Apr 12 04:08 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 170K Apr 12 04:08 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.6K Apr 12 04:04 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 66K Apr 12 04:04 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K Apr 23 07:57 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K Apr 23 07:57 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-01-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-01-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-01-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME SmartHome-PT-01-CTLFireability-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1717028947335

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=SmartHome-PT-01
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-30 00:29:09] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-30 00:29:09] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-30 00:29:09] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 78 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:09] [INFO ] Transformed 38 places.
[2024-05-30 00:29:09] [INFO ] Transformed 113 transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:09] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-30 00:29:09] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 38 places and 113 transitions and 321 arcs in 230 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 25 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
Ensure Unique test removed 58 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 58 transitions.
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-01-CTLFireability-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-01-CTLFireability-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 33 out of 38 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 38/38 places, 55/55 transitions.
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 10 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 10 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 38 transition count 45
Applied a total of 10 rules in 29 ms. Remains 38 /38 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/55 (removed 10) transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 34 transitions (discarded 11 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 34 rows 38 cols
[2024-05-30 00:29:09] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 12 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 373 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 00:29:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 34 transitions (discarded 11 similar events)
[2024-05-30 00:29:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 00:29:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 21 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-30 00:29:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 98 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 516 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 44 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 34 transitions (discarded 11 similar events)
[2024-05-30 00:29:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 00:29:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 21 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 36/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/37 variables, 13/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 1/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/38 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 33/71 variables, 38/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 20/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 1/72 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/72 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 72/72 variables, and 112 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved in 1532 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 38/38 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 38/38 constraints, ReadFeed: 21/21 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 36/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/37 variables, 13/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 1/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/38 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 33/71 variables, 38/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 20/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 44/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 1/72 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/72 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 72/72 variables, and 156 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved in 1042 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 38/38 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 38/38 constraints, ReadFeed: 21/21 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2642ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2657ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 38/38 places, 45/55 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3241 ms. Remains : 38/38 places, 45/55 transitions.
Support contains 33 out of 38 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 45 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 67 to 60
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1828 ms. (21 steps per ms) remains 3/60 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 356 ms. (112 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 148 ms. (268 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 163 ms. (243 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
[2024-05-30 00:29:13] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 34 transitions (discarded 11 similar events)
[2024-05-30 00:29:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 00:29:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 21 read => feed constraints.
Problem AtomicPropp31 is UNSAT
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp58 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp64 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 13/72 variables, and 15 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 0 unsolved in 31 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 8/38 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 0/1 constraints, State Equation: 0/38 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/21 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 41ms problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
[2024-05-30 00:29:13] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 2 formulas.
[2024-05-30 00:29:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-01-CTLFireability-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-30 00:29:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 45 transitions.
Computed a total of 20 stabilizing places and 13 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 102 edges and 38 vertex of which 37 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 38/38 places, 45/45 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 35 transition count 42
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 35 transition count 42
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 35 transition count 40
Applied a total of 8 rules in 5 ms. Remains 35 /38 variables (removed 3) and now considering 40/45 (removed 5) transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 29 transitions (discarded 11 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 29 rows 35 cols
[2024-05-30 00:29:14] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 2 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 00:29:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 29 transitions (discarded 11 similar events)
[2024-05-30 00:29:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 00:29:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 18 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-30 00:29:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 55 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 99 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 39 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 29 transitions (discarded 11 similar events)
[2024-05-30 00:29:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 00:29:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 18 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/34 variables, 13/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/35 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 28/63 variables, 35/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 17/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 1/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/64 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 64/64 variables, and 68 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved in 813 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 35/35 constraints, ReadFeed: 18/18 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/34 variables, 13/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/35 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 28/63 variables, 35/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 17/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 39/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 1/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/64 variables, 0/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 64/64 variables, and 107 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved in 861 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 14/14 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 35/35 constraints, ReadFeed: 18/18 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1691ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1692ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 35/38 places, 40/45 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1798 ms. Remains : 35/38 places, 40/45 transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 40 transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3451874693727842812.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12653014452507744503.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3451874693727842812.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12653014452507744503.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,17665,0.022267,3444,2,135,5,539,6,0,157,472,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((E(((!(((p21==1)&&(p33==1))) + AX(((p10==1)&&(p24==1)))) + (EX((p4==1)) + AX(((p23==1)&&(p24==1))))) U AG(AX(((p13==1)&&(p24==1))))) ...347
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!((E(((!(((p21==1)&&(p33==1))) + !(EX(!(((p10==1)&&(p24==1)))))) + (EX((p4==1)) + !(EX(!(((p23==1)&&...718
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t24, t26, t30, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersec...174
(forward)formula 0,0,0.062534,4988,1,0,75,5414,129,54,1089,6175,141
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 38/38 places, 45/45 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 35 transition count 42
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 35 transition count 42
Applied a total of 6 rules in 2 ms. Remains 35 /38 variables (removed 3) and now considering 42/45 (removed 3) transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 33 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 33 rows 35 cols
[2024-05-30 00:29:15] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 00:29:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 33 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2024-05-30 00:29:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 00:29:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-30 00:29:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 120 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 41 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 33 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2024-05-30 00:29:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 00:29:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/34 variables, 11/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/35 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 32/67 variables, 35/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 19/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/68 variables, 1/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/68 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 68/68 variables, and 68 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved in 1186 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 35/35 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/34 variables, 11/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/35 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 32/67 variables, 35/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 19/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 41/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/68 variables, 1/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/68 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 68/68 variables, and 109 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved in 1088 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 35/35 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2300ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2302ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 35/38 places, 42/45 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2426 ms. Remains : 35/38 places, 42/45 transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9891696741929536156.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17872945409173170225.ctl : 6 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9891696741929536156.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17872945409173170225.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,39745,0.010896,3572,2,161,5,716,6,0,165,640,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EF(AG(((p1==1)&&(p10==1)))) + E(((p7==1)||((p21==1)&&(p27==1))) U ((p20==1) * EX(A((p10==1) U (p13==1)))))) + A(((((AG((p10==1)) + (p7=...330
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(((p1==1)&&(p10==1))))))] != FALSE + [((EY((FwdU(Init,((p7==1)||((p21==1)&&(p2...739
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t24, t26, t30, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersec...174
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 27/0/15
(forward)formula 0,0,0.071876,5736,1,0,81,9250,135,60,1077,10983,143
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 38/38 places, 45/45 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 33 transition count 40
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 33 transition count 40
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 33 transition count 38
Applied a total of 12 rules in 3 ms. Remains 33 /38 variables (removed 5) and now considering 38/45 (removed 7) transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:18] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 29 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 29 rows 33 cols
[2024-05-30 00:29:18] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 00:29:18] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 29 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2024-05-30 00:29:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 00:29:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 18 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-30 00:29:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 53 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 110 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 37 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:18] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 29 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2024-05-30 00:29:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 00:29:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 18 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/32 variables, 11/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/33 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 28/61 variables, 33/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 17/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/62 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 62/62 variables, and 64 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved in 792 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 33/33 constraints, ReadFeed: 18/18 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/32 variables, 11/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/33 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 28/61 variables, 33/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 17/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 37/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/62 variables, 1/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/62 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 62/62 variables, and 101 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved in 685 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 33/33 constraints, ReadFeed: 18/18 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1489ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1493ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 33/38 places, 38/45 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1607 ms. Remains : 33/38 places, 38/45 transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 38 transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16037957419624727492.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17467858264331178580.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16037957419624727492.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17467858264331178580.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,17665,0.00797,3556,2,125,5,511,6,0,153,438,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((AF(E((((p1==1)&&(p21==1))||((p4==1)&&(p24==1))) U ((p13==1)&&(p24==1)))) + AX(EX(E((p4==1) U ((p1==1)&&(p15==1)))))) U AX((((p7==1)&&(...198
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(!(EG(!(E((((p1==1)&&(p21==1))||((p4==1)&&(p24==1))) U ((p13==1)&&(p24==1)))))) + !(EX(!(EX(E((p4==1...280
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t22, t24, t28, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersec...174
(forward)formula 0,0,0.026522,4400,1,0,58,3049,90,36,933,3068,82
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 38/38 places, 45/45 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 37 transition count 45
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 35 transition count 43
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 35 transition count 43
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 35 transition count 42
Applied a total of 6 rules in 8 ms. Remains 35 /38 variables (removed 3) and now considering 42/45 (removed 3) transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 32 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 35 cols
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 8 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned [1]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 49 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 34/38 places, 42/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 34 /34 variables (removed 0) and now considering 42/42 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 58 ms. Remains : 34/38 places, 42/45 transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18254172486946191497.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14760907691039744631.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18254172486946191497.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14760907691039744631.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,28801,0.008586,3552,2,143,5,567,6,0,163,529,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AX((AX(A((p2==1) U ((p11==1)&&(p29==1)))) + EG((p17==1)))) * (p10==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p10==0)) * !(EX(!((!(EX(!(!((E(!(((p11==1)&&(p29==1))) U (!((p2==1)) * !(((p11==1)&&(p29==...226
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t25, t27, t31, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersec...174
(forward)formula 0,0,0.039239,4396,1,0,61,4942,105,41,932,5410,104
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 38/38 places, 45/45 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 33 transition count 40
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 33 transition count 40
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 33 transition count 38
Applied a total of 12 rules in 3 ms. Remains 33 /38 variables (removed 5) and now considering 38/45 (removed 7) transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 29 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 29 rows 33 cols
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 6 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned [1]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 59 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 32/38 places, 38/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 32 /32 variables (removed 0) and now considering 38/38 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 63 ms. Remains : 32/38 places, 38/45 transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 38 transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4786879140077478260.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5585909487267324021.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4786879140077478260.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5585909487267324021.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,17665,0.00775,3528,2,139,5,531,6,0,151,480,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX((p4==0)) + AG(EF(EX(((p21==1)&&(p24==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(!(EX(!((p4==0)))))),TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U EX(((p21==1)&&(p24==1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t22, t24, t28, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersec...174
(forward)formula 0,1,0.028425,4108,1,0,54,3356,87,34,889,3276,79
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 38/38 places, 45/45 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 37 transition count 45
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 33 transition count 41
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 33 transition count 41
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 33 transition count 39
Applied a total of 11 rules in 3 ms. Remains 33 /38 variables (removed 5) and now considering 39/45 (removed 6) transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 29 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 29 rows 33 cols
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 3 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned [1]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 55 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 32/38 places, 39/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 32 /32 variables (removed 0) and now considering 39/39 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 59 ms. Remains : 32/38 places, 39/45 transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 39 transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5181311524850370484.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11234604490643266183.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5181311524850370484.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11234604490643266183.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,17665,0.009015,3528,2,125,5,612,6,0,152,569,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EX(((p21==1)||(p4==1))) + (p5==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((p5==1))) * !(EX(((p21==1)||(p4==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t23, t25, t29, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersec...174
(forward)formula 0,1,0.027155,4108,1,0,52,3057,83,32,852,3133,74
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 38/38 places, 45/45 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 22 edges and 38 vertex of which 4 / 38 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 3 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 98 edges and 36 vertex of which 35 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 33 transition count 39
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 33 transition count 39
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 25 transition count 31
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 23 transition count 27
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 23 transition count 27
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 6 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 6 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 23 transition count 21
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 22 transition count 21
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 21 transition count 20
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 21 transition count 20
Applied a total of 35 rules in 31 ms. Remains 21 /38 variables (removed 17) and now considering 20/45 (removed 25) transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 13 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 13 rows 21 cols
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 13 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 12 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 49 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 80 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 19 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 13 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 00:29:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 12 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/21 variables, 8/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 12/33 variables, 21/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 11/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/34 variables, 1/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/34 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 34/34 variables, and 42 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved in 388 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 21/21 constraints, ReadFeed: 12/12 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/21 variables, 8/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 12/33 variables, 21/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 11/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 19/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/34 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/34 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 34/34 variables, and 61 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved in 346 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 21/21 constraints, ReadFeed: 12/12 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 739ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 740ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 21/38 places, 20/45 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 860 ms. Remains : 21/38 places, 20/45 transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 20 transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14743171675744633458.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5463826255898392473.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14743171675744633458.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5463826255898392473.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,70,0.004381,3424,2,69,5,219,6,0,82,191,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A((p2==1) U EF((p11!=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!(E(TRUE U (p11!=1))) U (!((p2==1)) * !(E(TRUE U (p11!=1))))) + EG(!(E(TRUE U (p11!=1)))))))] !=...161
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t12, t16, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersec...174
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,0.012282,4004,1,0,34,746,67,22,555,869,54
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 38/38 places, 45/45 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 37 transition count 45
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 32 transition count 40
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 32 transition count 40
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 32 transition count 38
Applied a total of 13 rules in 3 ms. Remains 32 /38 variables (removed 6) and now considering 38/45 (removed 7) transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 29 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 29 rows 32 cols
[2024-05-30 00:29:21] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 00:29:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 29 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2024-05-30 00:29:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 00:29:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 18 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-30 00:29:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 43 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 74 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 37 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 29 transitions (discarded 9 similar events)
[2024-05-30 00:29:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 00:29:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 18 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/32 variables, 11/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/60 variables, 32/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 17/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/61 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/61 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 61/61 variables, and 62 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved in 857 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 32/32 constraints, ReadFeed: 18/18 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/32 variables, 11/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/60 variables, 32/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 17/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 37/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/61 variables, 1/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/61 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 61/61 variables, and 99 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved in 614 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 32/32 constraints, ReadFeed: 18/18 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1480ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1481ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 32/38 places, 38/45 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1558 ms. Remains : 32/38 places, 38/45 transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 38 transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability353924715729752185.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8781376012529996073.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability353924715729752185.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8781376012529996073.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,17665,0.008644,3548,2,119,5,509,6,0,152,451,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(EF((((p13==1)||(((p1==0)||(p7==0))&&((p21==0)||(p36==0))))||(p11==0)))) + EG(((p10==0) * EX((p23==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(EG(((p10==0) * EX((p23==0)))))),TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (((p13==1)||(((p1==0)||(p7==0))&&((p21==0)||...189
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t22, t24, t28, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersec...174
(forward)formula 0,1,0.025549,4128,1,0,53,2640,87,32,918,2465,76
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 38/38 places, 45/45 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 37 transition count 45
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 35 transition count 43
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 35 transition count 43
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 35 transition count 42
Applied a total of 6 rules in 3 ms. Remains 35 /38 variables (removed 3) and now considering 42/45 (removed 3) transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 32 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 32 rows 35 cols
[2024-05-30 00:29:23] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned [1]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 37 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 34/38 places, 42/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 34 /34 variables (removed 0) and now considering 42/42 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 41 ms. Remains : 34/38 places, 42/45 transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13193805620896719559.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8783710765062658197.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13193805620896719559.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8783710765062658197.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,28801,0.00845,3548,2,152,5,617,6,0,163,579,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!(EX(EG((AG((p8==1)) + (p19==1))))) U (!((!(((EX((p15==1)) * AG(((p11==1)&&(p31==1)))) * AX((p18==1)))) + !(((p21==1)&&(p27==1))))) + (...306
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!((!(((EX((p15==1)) * !(E(TRUE U !(((p11==1)&&(p31==1)))))) * !(EX(!((p18==1)))))) + !(((p21==...1192
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t25, t27, t31, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersec...174
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,0.057343,5184,1,0,76,6804,127,66,1042,7665,141
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 38/38 places, 45/45 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 35 transition count 42
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 35 transition count 42
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 35 transition count 41
Applied a total of 7 rules in 2 ms. Remains 35 /38 variables (removed 3) and now considering 41/45 (removed 4) transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 31 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 31 rows 35 cols
[2024-05-30 00:29:23] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 00:29:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 31 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2024-05-30 00:29:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 00:29:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 19 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-30 00:29:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 107 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 40 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 31 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2024-05-30 00:29:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 00:29:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 19 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/34 variables, 12/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/35 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 30/65 variables, 35/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 18/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/66 variables, 1/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/66 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 66/66 variables, and 68 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 1140 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 35/35 constraints, ReadFeed: 19/19 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/34 variables, 12/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/35 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 30/65 variables, 35/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 18/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 40/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/66 variables, 1/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/66 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 66/66 variables, and 108 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 798 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 35/35 constraints, ReadFeed: 19/19 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1961ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1963ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 35/38 places, 41/45 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2074 ms. Remains : 35/38 places, 41/45 transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 41 transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1869754009134680498.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11653701776571544555.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1869754009134680498.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11653701776571544555.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,26497,0.008731,3568,2,148,5,632,6,0,161,569,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((E(((EX(((p11==1)||(p2==1))) + (AG(((p11==1)&&(p32==1))) * (p12==1))) + (((p1==1)&&(p4==1))&&(p10!=1))) U !(EF((p2!=1)))) * AG(!(AF((p...277
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,((E(((EX(((p11==1)||(p2==1))) + (!(E(TRUE U !(((p11==1)&&(p32==1))))) * (p12==1))) + (((p1==1)&&(p4=...401
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t24, t26, t30, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersec...174
(forward)formula 0,1,0.040088,4940,1,0,63,4608,117,40,1020,4810,125
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 38/38 places, 45/45 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 23 edges and 38 vertex of which 4 / 38 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 98 edges and 36 vertex of which 35 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 58 edges and 29 vertex of which 26 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 3 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 3 places :
Also discarding 3 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 3 transitions
Graph (trivial) has 22 edges and 26 vertex of which 14 / 26 are part of one of the 7 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 7 places
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 19 transition count 34
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 21 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 21 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 13 edges and 12 vertex of which 2 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 10 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 10 places :
Also discarding 9 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 9 transitions
Iterating post reduction 1 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 2 transition count 4
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 2 transition count 3
Applied a total of 42 rules in 3 ms. Remains 2 /38 variables (removed 36) and now considering 3/45 (removed 42) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 3 rows 2 cols
[2024-05-30 00:29:25] [INFO ] Computed 1 invariants in 0 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 18 ms returned []
[2024-05-30 00:29:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-30 00:29:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 23 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 43 ms to find 0 implicit places.
[2024-05-30 00:29:25] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 1 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/2 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 2/4 variables, 2/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/4 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 4/5 variables, and 5 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 35 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 2/2 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/2 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 2/4 variables, 2/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/4 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 4/5 variables, and 6 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 27 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 2/2 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, State Equation: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 65ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 65ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 2/38 places, 3/45 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 118 ms. Remains : 2/38 places, 3/45 transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 3 transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 0 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1500378937920273688.gal : 0 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8199114401386158045.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1500378937920273688.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8199114401386158045.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2,0.00272,3276,2,4,5,12,5,0,12,6,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((p6==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (p6==0))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.005243,3592,1,0,5,19,12,0,42,10,5
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-01-CTLFireability-2024-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 38/38 places, 45/45 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 102 edges and 38 vertex of which 37 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 33 transition count 41
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 33 transition count 41
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 28 transition count 36
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 27 transition count 34
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 27 transition count 34
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 5 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 5 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 27 transition count 29
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 26 transition count 28
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 26 transition count 28
Applied a total of 28 rules in 11 ms. Remains 26 /38 variables (removed 12) and now considering 28/45 (removed 17) transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:25] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 21 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 21 rows 26 cols
[2024-05-30 00:29:25] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned [1]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 42 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 25/38 places, 28/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 25 /25 variables (removed 0) and now considering 28/28 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 56 ms. Remains : 25/38 places, 28/45 transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 28 transitions.
[2024-05-30 00:29:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16696019369002340646.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1195089913267799404.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16696019369002340646.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1195089913267799404.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,829,0.010995,3476,2,98,5,402,6,0,112,378,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EF(!((EG((p18==1)) + ((p20==1)&&(p18==1))))) U AF(!((!((((p21==1)&&(p35==1))&&(p37==1))) * !(EG((p23==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,E(TRUE U !((EG((p18==1)) + ((p20==1)&&(p18==1)))))) * !(EG(!(!((!((((p21==1)&&(p35==1))&&(p37==1))) ...188
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t16, t18, t22, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersec...174
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,0.048592,4320,1,0,58,3734,90,38,772,4553,89
FORMULA SmartHome-PT-01-CTLFireability-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2024-05-30 00:29:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2024-05-30 00:29:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Total runtime 16518 ms.

BK_STOP 1717028965672

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="SmartHome-PT-01"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is SmartHome-PT-01, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r378-smll-171683811300338"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/SmartHome-PT-01.tgz
mv SmartHome-PT-01 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;