Execution Chart

We display below the execution chart for this examination (boot time has been removed).

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.r378-smll-171683810900146.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2024-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.....................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5568
Executing tool itstools
Input is SimpleLoadBal-PT-02, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r378-smll-171683810900146
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 552K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 97K May 14 13:22 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 45K May 14 13:22 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 18 16:43 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.0K Apr 23 07:56 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K Apr 23 07:56 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.9K Apr 23 07:56 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K Apr 23 07:56 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K Apr 13 12:03 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 158K Apr 13 12:03 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.6K Apr 13 12:03 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 49K Apr 13 12:03 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.9K Apr 23 07:56 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K Apr 23 07:56 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 18 16:43 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 18 16:43 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 38K May 18 16:43 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)
FORMULA_NAME SimpleLoadBal-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-00
FORMULA_NAME SimpleLoadBal-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-01
FORMULA_NAME SimpleLoadBal-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-02
FORMULA_NAME SimpleLoadBal-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-03
FORMULA_NAME SimpleLoadBal-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-04
FORMULA_NAME SimpleLoadBal-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-05
FORMULA_NAME SimpleLoadBal-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-06
FORMULA_NAME SimpleLoadBal-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-07
FORMULA_NAME SimpleLoadBal-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-08
FORMULA_NAME SimpleLoadBal-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-09
FORMULA_NAME SimpleLoadBal-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-10
FORMULA_NAME SimpleLoadBal-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-11
FORMULA_NAME SimpleLoadBal-PT-02-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME SimpleLoadBal-PT-02-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME SimpleLoadBal-PT-02-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME SimpleLoadBal-PT-02-CTLFireability-2023-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1716958087038

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=SimpleLoadBal-PT-02
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202405141337
[2024-05-29 04:48:09] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2024-05-29 04:48:09] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2024-05-29 04:48:09] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 79 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:09] [INFO ] Transformed 32 places.
[2024-05-29 04:48:09] [INFO ] Transformed 45 transitions.
[2024-05-29 04:48:09] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2024-05-29 04:48:09] [INFO ] Completing missing partition info from NUPN : creating a component with [P_client_idle_1, P_client_idle_2, P_client_waiting_1, P_client_waiting_2, P_client_request_1, P_client_request_2, P_client_ack_1, P_client_ack_2, P_server_idle_1, P_server_idle_2, P_server_waiting_1, P_server_waiting_2, P_server_processed_1, P_server_processed_2, P_server_notification_1, P_server_notification_2, P_server_notification_ack_1, P_server_notification_ack_2, P_server_request_1_1, P_server_request_1_2, P_server_request_2_1, P_server_request_2_2, P_lb_idle_1, P_lb_routing_1_1, P_lb_routing_1_2, P_lb_balancing_1, P_lb_load_1_0, P_lb_load_1_1, P_lb_load_1_2, P_lb_load_2_0, P_lb_load_2_1, P_lb_load_2_2]
[2024-05-29 04:48:09] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 32 places and 45 transitions and 252 arcs in 335 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 23 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 5 formulas.
FORMULA SimpleLoadBal-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SimpleLoadBal-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SimpleLoadBal-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SimpleLoadBal-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SimpleLoadBal-PT-02-CTLFireability-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 24 out of 32 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 32/32 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 24 ms. Remains 32 /32 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 04:48:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 35 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 35 rows 32 cols
[2024-05-29 04:48:10] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 20 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 313 ms returned [2, 10, 11]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 391 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 29/32 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 29 /29 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 448 ms. Remains : 29/32 places, 45/45 transitions.
Support contains 24 out of 29 places after structural reductions.
[2024-05-29 04:48:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 50 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 45 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 48 to 42
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 2337 ms. (17 steps per ms) remains 6/42 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 333 ms. (119 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 108 ms. (366 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 167 ms. (238 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 103 ms. (384 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 97 ms. (408 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 127 ms. (312 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
[2024-05-29 04:48:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 35 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 35 rows 29 cols
[2024-05-29 04:48:12] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 7 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 10 read => feed constraints.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 19/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp12 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp27 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp28 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp34 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 2/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp21 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp43 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 19/64 variables, and 23 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 6 solved, 0 unsolved in 133 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 19/29 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 2/4 constraints, State Equation: 0/29 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/10 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 202ms problems are : Problem set: 6 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 6 atomic propositions for a total of 11 simplifications.
[2024-05-29 04:48:12] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 2 formulas.
[2024-05-29 04:48:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
FORMULA SimpleLoadBal-PT-02-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA SimpleLoadBal-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2024-05-29 04:48:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 45 transitions.
Support contains 22 out of 29 places (down from 23) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 29/29 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 29 /29 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 04:48:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 35 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2024-05-29 04:48:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 04:48:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 97 ms returned [2]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 100 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 28/29 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 28 /28 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 106 ms. Remains : 28/29 places, 45/45 transitions.
[2024-05-29 04:48:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 45 transitions.
[2024-05-29 04:48:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2282617989582076593.gal : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4814427543344991843.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2282617989582076593.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4814427543344991843.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,832,0.070472,4312,2,493,5,3131,6,0,160,2975,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((A((((P_lb_routing_1_2==1)&&(P_lb_load_1_1==1))&&(P_lb_load_2_2==1)) U (((P_lb_balancing_1==1)&&(P_lb_load_1_0==1))&&(P_lb_load_2_1==1...232
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(EY(Init),!((((P_lb_balancing_1==1)&&(P_lb_load_1_0==1))&&(P_lb_load_2_1==1)))) * (!((((P_lb_routing_1_2...480
(forward)formula 0,0,0.073887,4564,1,0,10,3131,9,2,267,2975,3
FORMULA SimpleLoadBal-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 29/29 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 29 /29 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 04:48:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 35 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2024-05-29 04:48:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 04:48:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned [2]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 73 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 28/29 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 28 /28 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 77 ms. Remains : 28/29 places, 45/45 transitions.
[2024-05-29 04:48:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 45 transitions.
[2024-05-29 04:48:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11954353144493039436.gal : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16987057903339793434.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11954353144493039436.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16987057903339793434.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,832,0.053946,4388,2,493,5,3131,6,0,160,2975,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(((EX(!(EF((((P_lb_routing_1_2==1)&&(P_lb_load_1_2==1))&&(P_lb_load_2_1==1))))) * (P_lb_routing_1_1==1)) * ((P_lb_load_1_2==1)&&(P_lb_...538
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(((EX(!(E(TRUE U (((P_lb_routing_1_2==1)&&(P_lb_load_1_2==1))&&(P_lb_load_2_1==1))))) * (P_lb_routi...614
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t27, t29, t35, t37, t38, t42, t43, t44, Intersection with reachable at each ...216
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,0.396606,10988,1,0,174,33062,127,96,1482,28936,199
FORMULA SimpleLoadBal-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 29/29 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 29 /29 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 04:48:13] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 35 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2024-05-29 04:48:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 04:48:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned [2]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 61 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 28/29 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 28 /28 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 65 ms. Remains : 28/29 places, 45/45 transitions.
[2024-05-29 04:48:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 45 transitions.
[2024-05-29 04:48:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14171486801154054999.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14402236313230564225.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14171486801154054999.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14402236313230564225.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,832,0.050046,4384,2,493,5,3131,6,0,160,2975,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EX(!((AF(!(((P_server_idle_1==1)&&(P_server_request_2_1==1)))) + E((((P_lb_routing_1_1==1)&&(P_lb_load_1_1==1))&&(P_lb_load_2_1==1)) U ...296
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,EX(!((!(EG(!(!(((P_server_idle_1==1)&&(P_server_request_2_1==1)))))) + E((((P_lb_routing_1_1==1)&...366
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t27, t29, t35, t37, t38, t42, t43, t44, Intersection with reachable at each ...216
(forward)formula 0,0,0.190272,7024,1,0,108,15589,110,52,1357,12186,114
FORMULA SimpleLoadBal-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 29/29 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 29 /29 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 04:48:13] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 35 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2024-05-29 04:48:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 04:48:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned [2]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 65 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 28/29 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 28 /28 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 69 ms. Remains : 28/29 places, 45/45 transitions.
[2024-05-29 04:48:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 45 transitions.
[2024-05-29 04:48:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10715234991970666407.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13719075260678837130.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10715234991970666407.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13719075260678837130.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,832,0.051776,4380,2,493,5,3131,6,0,160,2975,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((((P_server_notification_2==1)&&(P_lb_idle_1==1))&&(P_lb_load_2_1==1)) U ((AX(((AG(((P_client_idle_1==1)||(((P_lb_routing_1_1==1)&&(P_l...615
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG((FwdU(Init,(((P_server_notification_2==1)&&(P_lb_idle_1==1))&&(P_lb_load_2_1==1))) * (!(EX(!(((!(E(TRUE ...1385
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t27, t29, t35, t37, t38, t42, t43, t44, Intersection with reachable at each ...216
(forward)formula 0,0,0.210105,7020,1,0,109,13379,132,50,1429,11327,113
FORMULA SimpleLoadBal-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 29/29 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 29 /29 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 04:48:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 35 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2024-05-29 04:48:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 04:48:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 80 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 04:48:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 35 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2024-05-29 04:48:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 04:48:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 10 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 04:48:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 118 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 201 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 43 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 04:48:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 35 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2024-05-29 04:48:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 04:48:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 10 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 3/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 4/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
[2024-05-29 04:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD36 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 2/29 variables, 3/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 2/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
[2024-05-29 04:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
[2024-05-29 04:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
[2024-05-29 04:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 35/64 variables, 29/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 10/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/64 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 64/64 variables, and 82 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved in 1836 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 29/29 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 29/29 constraints, ReadFeed: 10/10 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 3/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 4/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 2/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 2/29 variables, 3/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 2/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 2/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 35/64 variables, 29/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 10/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 42/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/64 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 64/64 variables, and 124 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved in 1395 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 29/29 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 29/29 constraints, ReadFeed: 10/10 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 42/43 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 3316ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 1 dead transitions in 3319ms
Found 1 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 1 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 29/29 places, 44/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 29 /29 variables (removed 0) and now considering 44/44 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 3526 ms. Remains : 29/29 places, 44/45 transitions.
[2024-05-29 04:48:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 44 transitions.
[2024-05-29 04:48:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12876418766209986492.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14378956525380561548.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12876418766209986492.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14378956525380561548.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,832,0.051118,4380,2,488,5,3063,6,0,163,2886,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AF(((P_client_waiting_2==1)&&(P_client_ack_2==1))) * EG(EX(AF((((P_lb_routing_1_1==0)||(P_lb_load_1_1==0))||(P_lb_load_2_0==0)))))) * A...209
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG(Init,!(((P_client_waiting_2==1)&&(P_client_ack_2==1))))] = FALSE * [(Init * !(EG(EX(!(EG(!((((P_lb_routi...302
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t27, t29, t35, t36, t37, t41, t42, t43, Intersection with reachable at each ...216
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 40/0/4
(forward)formula 0,0,0.195514,6756,1,0,123,13543,127,58,1432,12318,149
FORMULA SimpleLoadBal-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 29/29 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 29 /29 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 04:48:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 35 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2024-05-29 04:48:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 04:48:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned [2]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 72 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 28/29 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 28 /28 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 74 ms. Remains : 28/29 places, 45/45 transitions.
[2024-05-29 04:48:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 45 transitions.
[2024-05-29 04:48:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4906117791459642468.gal : 1 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8236351306096781741.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4906117791459642468.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8236351306096781741.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,832,0.052299,4384,2,493,5,3131,6,0,160,2975,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((A(EG(((!(AX(((P_server_idle_1==1)&&(P_server_request_1_1==1)))) * (P_server_notification_1==1)) * ((P_lb_balancing_1==1)&&(P_lb_load_1_...394
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * (!((E(!(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!((((P_server_notification_1==1)&&(P_lb_idle_1==1))&&(P_lb_load_1_1==1)))...685
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t27, t29, t35, t37, t38, t42, t43, t44, Intersection with reachable at each ...216
(forward)formula 0,1,0.259166,8344,1,0,125,19453,127,61,1426,16890,155
FORMULA SimpleLoadBal-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 29/29 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 29 /29 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 04:48:18] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 35 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2024-05-29 04:48:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 04:48:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 81 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 04:48:18] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 35 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2024-05-29 04:48:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 04:48:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 10 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 04:48:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 160 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 43 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 04:48:18] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 35 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2024-05-29 04:48:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 04:48:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 10 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 3/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 4/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
[2024-05-29 04:48:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD36 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 2/29 variables, 3/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 2/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
[2024-05-29 04:48:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
[2024-05-29 04:48:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
[2024-05-29 04:48:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 35/64 variables, 29/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 10/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/64 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 64/64 variables, and 82 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved in 1408 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 29/29 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 29/29 constraints, ReadFeed: 10/10 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 3/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 4/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 2/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 2/29 variables, 3/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 2/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 2/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 35/64 variables, 29/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 10/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 42/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/64 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 64/64 variables, and 124 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved in 1196 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 29/29 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 29/29 constraints, ReadFeed: 10/10 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 42/43 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 2639ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 1 dead transitions in 2640ms
Found 1 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 1 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 29/29 places, 44/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 29 /29 variables (removed 0) and now considering 44/44 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 2804 ms. Remains : 29/29 places, 44/45 transitions.
[2024-05-29 04:48:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 44 transitions.
[2024-05-29 04:48:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18341052621689706414.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7675227163282784167.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18341052621689706414.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7675227163282784167.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,832,0.051142,4380,2,488,5,3063,6,0,163,2886,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AX(EX(EG(((P_client_waiting_2==0)||(P_client_ack_2==0))))) + EX(EG((((P_server_notification_1==0)||(P_lb_balancing_1==0))||(P_lb_load_1...202
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(EY((Init * !((!(EX(!(EX(EG(((P_client_waiting_2==0)||(P_client_ack_2==0))))))) + EX(EG((((P_server_notifica...258
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t27, t29, t35, t36, t37, t41, t42, t43, Intersection with reachable at each ...216
(forward)formula 0,1,0.17681,6492,1,0,106,13169,117,51,1386,10960,107
FORMULA SimpleLoadBal-PT-02-CTLFireability-2024-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 29/29 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 29 /29 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 04:48:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 35 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2024-05-29 04:48:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 04:48:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 04:48:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 35 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2024-05-29 04:48:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 04:48:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 10 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 04:48:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 137 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 43 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 04:48:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 35 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2024-05-29 04:48:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 04:48:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 10 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 3/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 4/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
[2024-05-29 04:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD36 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 2/29 variables, 3/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 2/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
[2024-05-29 04:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
[2024-05-29 04:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
[2024-05-29 04:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 35/64 variables, 29/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 10/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/64 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 64/64 variables, and 82 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved in 1495 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 29/29 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 29/29 constraints, ReadFeed: 10/10 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 3/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 4/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 2/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 2/29 variables, 3/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 2/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 2/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 35/64 variables, 29/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 10/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 42/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/64 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 64/64 variables, and 124 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved in 1103 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 29/29 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 29/29 constraints, ReadFeed: 10/10 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 42/43 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 2644ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 1 dead transitions in 2647ms
Found 1 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 1 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 29/29 places, 44/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 29 /29 variables (removed 0) and now considering 44/44 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 2789 ms. Remains : 29/29 places, 44/45 transitions.
[2024-05-29 04:48:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 44 transitions.
[2024-05-29 04:48:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7380387973230297597.gal : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9563979364472129871.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7380387973230297597.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9563979364472129871.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,832,0.052717,4380,2,488,5,3063,6,0,163,2886,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AX(FALSE) U (((!(((P_client_waiting_2==1)&&(P_client_ack_2==1))) + EX((((P_lb_routing_1_1==1)&&(P_lb_load_1_1==1))&&(P_lb_load_2_0==1))...538
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((((!(((P_client_waiting_2==1)&&(P_client_ack_2==1))) + EX((((P_lb_routing_1_1==1)&&(P_lb_load_1...1685
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t27, t29, t35, t36, t37, t41, t42, t43, Intersection with reachable at each ...216
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,0.335404,9660,1,0,128,27813,124,73,1477,24083,142
FORMULA SimpleLoadBal-PT-02-CTLFireability-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 29/29 places, 45/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 29 /29 variables (removed 0) and now considering 45/45 (removed 0) transitions.
[2024-05-29 04:48:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 35 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2024-05-29 04:48:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 04:48:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2024-05-29 04:48:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 35 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2024-05-29 04:48:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 04:48:24] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 10 read => feed constraints.
[2024-05-29 04:48:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 147 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 43 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2024-05-29 04:48:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 35 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2024-05-29 04:48:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2024-05-29 04:48:24] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 10 read => feed constraints.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 3/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 4/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
[2024-05-29 04:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD36 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 2/29 variables, 3/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 2/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
[2024-05-29 04:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
[2024-05-29 04:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
[2024-05-29 04:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 35/64 variables, 29/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 10/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/64 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 64/64 variables, and 82 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved in 1700 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 29/29 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 29/29 constraints, ReadFeed: 10/10 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 3/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 4/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 2/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 2/29 variables, 3/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 2/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 2/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 35/64 variables, 29/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 10/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 42/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/64 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 64/64 variables, and 124 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved in 1335 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 29/29 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 29/29 constraints, ReadFeed: 10/10 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 42/43 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 3068ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 42 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 1 dead transitions in 3069ms
Found 1 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 1 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 29/29 places, 44/45 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 29 /29 variables (removed 0) and now considering 44/44 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 3219 ms. Remains : 29/29 places, 44/45 transitions.
[2024-05-29 04:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 44 transitions.
[2024-05-29 04:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3026944009842753429.gal : 2 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7362779155725574401.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3026944009842753429.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7362779155725574401.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202405141337/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,832,0.03488,4380,2,488,5,3063,6,0,163,2886,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(!(E((P_server_processed_1==1) U AF((((P_client_waiting_2==1)&&(P_client_ack_2==1))||(((P_server_notification_2==1)&&(P_lb_idle_1==1))...774
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EG(!(E((P_server_processed_1==1) U !(EG(!((((P_client_waiting_2==1)&&(P_client_ack_2==1))||(((P_serv...1176
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t27, t29, t35, t36, t37, t41, t42, t43, Intersection with reachable at each ...216
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,0.489767,16584,1,0,404,68772,142,250,1429,64207,464
FORMULA SimpleLoadBal-PT-02-CTLFireability-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2024-05-29 04:48:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2024-05-29 04:48:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Total runtime 18769 ms.

BK_STOP 1716958108322

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ export PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ PYTHONPATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs
+ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
+ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/pylibs:
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202405141337.jar
+ VERSION=202405141337
+ echo 'Running Version 202405141337'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="SimpleLoadBal-PT-02"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5568"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is SimpleLoadBal-PT-02, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r378-smll-171683810900146"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/SimpleLoadBal-PT-02.tgz
mv SimpleLoadBal-PT-02 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.txt" ] ; then
echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from text file)"
for x in $(grep Property CTLFireability.txt | cut -d ' ' -f 2 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;